DOCSLIB.ORG

Red Gap Ranch Cultural Resources Inventory, February 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Red Gap Ranch Cultural Resources Inventory, February 2014 A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY OF 567.89 ACRES FOR WATER INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT AT RED GAP RANCH IN COCONINO COUNTY, ARIZONA Prepared by: David E. Purcell, M.A., R.P.A. Reviewed and submitted by: Fred Huntington 4001 East Paradise Falls Drive Tucson, Arizona 85712 (520) 206-9585 Cultural Resources Report 2014-09 February 11, 2014 Project No. 1822.01 CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY OF 567.89 ACRES FOR WELLFIELD DEVELOPMENT AT RED GAP RANCH – i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................. vi INTRODUCTION AND PROJECT BACKGROUND ................................................................................ 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND..................................................................................................... 4 Previous Archaeological Projects in the Project Area .............................................................................. 4 Previously Identified Archaeological Sites in the Project Area ................................................................ 4 Arizona and National Registers of Historic Places ............................................................................... 7 Review of Historical Maps and Historical Documents ......................................................................... 7 Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 8 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .................................................................................................................. 9 CULTURE HISTORY FOR NORTH-CENTRAL ARIZONA .................................................................. 10 Paleoamerican Period .............................................................................................................................. 10 Paleoindian Period .................................................................................................................................. 11 Archaic Period ........................................................................................................................................ 13 Northern Colorado Plateau Archaic .................................................................................................... 14 Oshara ................................................................................................................................................. 14 Great Basin Archaic ............................................................................................................................ 15 Agricultural Period .................................................................................................................................. 16 Basketmaker II/Early Agricultural ...................................................................................................... 16 Ceramic ............................................................................................................................................... 17 Sinagua ............................................................................................................................................ 18 Pueblo Sequence ............................................................................................................................. 19 Transitional/Protohistoric ....................................................................................................................... 20 Historic Period ........................................................................................................................................ 21 SURVEY EXPECTATIONS AND RESEARCH DESIGN ....................................................................... 26 Pre-fieldwork Expectations ..................................................................................................................... 26 SURVEY METHODS ................................................................................................................................ 27 Task 1. Background Research ................................................................................................................. 27 Task 2. Field Survey ............................................................................................................................... 27 ASM Site Criteria ............................................................................................................................... 28 Site Types ........................................................................................................................................... 29 Artifact and Feature Documentation ................................................................................................... 29 Task 3. Final Report ................................................................................................................................ 30 SURVEY FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................. 31 Archaeological Site Descriptions ............................................................................................................ 40 AZ I:15:156(ASM) – Route 66 ........................................................................................................... 41 AZ I:16:61(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 44 AZ J:13:15(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 46 AZ J:13:16(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 50 AZ J:13:17(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 54 AZ J:13:20(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 58 AZ J:13:30(ASM) – Coconino-to-Winslow Line ............................................................................... 62 AZ J:13:33(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 64 AZ J:13:34(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 67 AZ J:13:35(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 70 Q:\jobs\1800's\1822.01\ARC\CRI\Initial Submittal_02-11-14\CRI_RGR__02-11-14.docx WestLand Resources, Inc. Engineering and Environmental Consultants ii – A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY OF 567.89 ACRES AZ J:13:36(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 72 AZ J:13:37(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 75 AZ J:13:38(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 76 AZ J:13:39(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 78 AZ J:13:40(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 80 AZ J:13:41(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 82 AZ J:13:42(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 84 AZ J:13:43(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 88 AZ J:13:44(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 92 AZ J:13:45(ASM) ............................................................................................................................... 97 AZ J:13:46(ASM) – Red Gap Ranch .................................................................................................. 98 AZ J:13:47(ASM) ............................................................................................................................. 106 AZ J:13:48(ASM) ............................................................................................................................. 112 AZ J:13:49(ASM) ............................................................................................................................. 116 AZ J:13:50(ASM) ............................................................................................................................. 120 AZ J:13:51(ASM) ............................................................................................................................. 124 AZ J:13:52(ASM) ............................................................................................................................. 128 AZ J:13:53(ASM) ............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ancient Pueblitos of the Sandia Foothills
    ANCIENT PUEBLITOS OF THE SANDIA FOOTHILLS By Hayward H. Franklin Maxwell Museum Technical Series No. 36 Maxwell Museum of Anthropology MSC01, 1050, 1 University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001 maxwellmuseum.unm.edu 2021 Copyright 2021, Maxwell Museum of Anthropology University of New Mexico TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Figures................................................................................................................................. iv Acknowledgments............................................................................................................................v INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................... 1 The Foothills Environment.................................................................................................. 2 Overview of Culture History............................................................................................... 4 Previous Studies................................................................................................................... 7 Methods................................................................................................................................9 RESULTS...................................................................................................................................... 11 Site Inventory..................................................................................................................... 11
    [Show full text]
  • The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2014 THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES Michael D. Ciani The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Ciani, Michael D., "THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES" (2014). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4218. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4218 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE BEAR IN THE FOOTPRINT: USING ETHNOGRAPHY TO INTERPRET ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVIDENCE OF BEAR HUNTING AND BEAR VENERATION IN THE NORTHERN ROCKIES By Michael David Ciani B.A. Anthropology, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2012 A.S. Historic Preservation, College of the Redwoods, Eureka, CA, 2006 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Anthropology, Cultural Heritage The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2014 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Douglas H. MacDonald, Chair Anthropology Dr. Anna M. Prentiss Anthropology Dr. Christopher Servheen Forestry and Conservation Ciani, Michael, M.A., May 2014 Major Anthropology The Bear in the Footprint: Using Ethnography to Interpret Archaeological Evidence of Bear Hunting and Bear Veneration in the Northern Rockies Chairperson: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES U.S. 84 SUNSHINE VALLEY: THE TESTING OF THREE SITES SOUTHEAST OF SANTA ROSA, NEW MEXICO by Peter Y. Bullock Submitted by Timothy D. Maxwell Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 176 SANTA FE 1997 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY Between October 30 and November 10, 1994, the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted limited archaeological testing atthree sites on U.S. 84 southeast of Santa Rosa, Guadalupe County, New Mexico. Limited testing at LA 105817, LA 57152, and LA 103315 was conducted at the request of the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD), to determine the extent and importance of cultural resources present as partof the proposed improvements alonga 12.8-km (8 miles) stretch of U.S. 84 southeast of Sank Rosa, New Mexico (Levine 1994). LA 103315 is on private and NMSHTD- aquired land. The other two sites (LA105817 and LA 57152) are on State Trust Land. All three sites are surface lithic artifact scatters, and probably represent temporary or seasonal camping locations.No intact features were foundon any of the sites associated with site occupation or use. In all three cases the data potentialof the portions of the sites within theproject area was determined to be minimal beyond that already documented, and no further investigations are recommended. MNM Project 41.589 NMSHTD Project No. NH-084-1(10)18 CPRC Archaeological Survey Permit No. SP-146 New Mexico State Land Office Survey Permit No.931027 CN 2355 J00040 ii CONTENTS Administrative Summary ............................................. ii Introduction ..................................................... 1 Environment ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Sean Doy Le 20
    Sean Doyle 2013 Conference Organized by: CONTENTS Acknowledgments ...........................................................................2 Summary Agenda ............................................................................3 Conference Map and Parking Information ................................5 Agenda ............................................................................................6 Business Meeting (Friday morning) .........................................6 Prehistoric Contexts Symposium (Friday afternoon) ...............8 Keynote Speaker (Friday Evening) ..........................................9 Conference and Workshops (Saturday all day) ...................... 10 Martin Room Schedule ...................................................... 13 Curation Methods Workshop (behind the scenes) ............. 13 Posters – Meet the Presenters (on the Mezzanine) ............ 13 Colorado Archaeology Society (CAS) Meeting ................ 13 Poster Presentations (Saturday all day) .................................. 14 Field Trip (Sunday morning) .................................................. 15 Abstracts ....................................................................................... 16 Ward F. Weakly Memorial Fund .................................................. 46 Native American Scholarship and Awardees ................................ 48 2012-2013 CCPA Executive Committees ..................................... 49 CCPA Fellows .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Plains Anthropologist Author Index
    Author Index AUTHOR INDEX Aaberg, Stephen A. (see Shelley, Phillip H. and George A. Agogino) 1983 Plant Gathering as a Settlement Determinant at the Pilgrim Stone Circle Site. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. (see Smith, Calvin, John Runyon, and George A. Agogino) 102, pp. 279-303. (see Smith, Shirley and George A. Agogino) Abbott, James T. Agogino, George A. and Al Parrish 1988 A Re-Evaluation of Boulderflow as a Relative Dating 1971 The Fowler-Parrish Site: A Folsom Campsite in Eastern Technique for Surficial Boulder Features. Vol. 33, No. Colorado. Vol. 16, No. 52, pp. 111-114. 119, pp. 113-118. Agogino, George A. and Eugene Galloway Abbott, Jane P. 1963 Osteology of the Four Bear Burials. Vol. 8, No. 19, pp. (see Martin, James E., Robert A. Alex, Lynn M. Alex, Jane P. 57-60. Abbott, Rachel C. Benton, and Louise F. Miller) 1965 The Sister’s Hill Site: A Hell Gap Site in North-Central Adams, Gary Wyoming. Vol. 10, No. 29, pp. 190-195. 1983 Tipi Rings at York Factory: An Archaeological- Ethnographic Interface. In: Memoir 19. Vol. 28, No. Agogino, George A. and Sally K. Sachs 102, pp. 7-15. 1960 Criticism of the Museum Orientation of Existing Antiquity Laws. Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 31-35. Adovasio, James M. (see Frison, George C., James M. Adovasio, and Ronald C. Agogino, George A. and William Sweetland Carlisle) 1985 The Stolle Mammoth: A Possible Clovis Kill-Site. Vol. 30, No. 107, pp. 73-76. Adovasio, James M., R. L. Andrews, and C. S. Fowler 1982 Some Observations on the Putative Fremont Agogino, George A., David K.
    [Show full text]
  • Arlington Springs Man”
    “Arlington Springs Man” Resource Summary: Study guide questions for viewing the video with answer key, vocabulary worksheet relating to Santa Rosa Island, additional articles about the island and Arlington Springs Man, maps of the current and prehistoric island. Subject Areas: science, human geography Grade Level Range: 5-10 Standards: CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.9-10.2 Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of historical events, scientific procedures/ experiments, or technical processes. CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.WHST.9-10.2.D Use precise language and domain-specific vocabulary to manage the complexity of the topic and convey a style appropriate to the discipline and context as well as to the expertise of likely readers. Resource Provided By: Lucy Carleton, English/ELD, Carpinteria High School, Carpinteria Unified School District Resource Details: “Arlington Springs Man” Running time 9 minutes. Cast: Dr. Jon Erlandson, archaeologist, University of Oregon Dr. John Johnson, curator of anthropology, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Don Morris, archaeologist Channel Islands national Park (retired) Phil Orr, (non speaking role) Curator of anthropology Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History Study Guide “Arlington Springs Man” The West of the West 1. Define strata: 2. In what ways is Santa Rosa Island just like a layer cake? 3. Why is Santa Rosa Island such a perfect place for archaeologists and geologists to study? 4. What caused the formation of the prehistoric mega-island Santarosae (Santa Rosae) and which of the current Channel Islands were part of it? 5. How far can a modern-day elephant swim? What can you conclude about how mammoths arrived to the islands? 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Bockman Grant Report
    Photographic and Metric Documentation of Early Diagnostic Artifacts from the Bockman Collection by Robert Dello-Russo, Ph.D. James Moore Gavin Bird Office of Archaeological Studies Santa Fe, NM INTRODUCTION This project was undertaken in response to a donation to the Museum of New Mexico by Mr. Neal Bockman in 2007. The donated assemblage of flaked stone artifacts includes drills, scrapers, bifaces and projectile points, the latter of which provide evidence of prehistoric occupations ranging from the Clovis and Folsom Paleoindian Periods (ca. 12,000-10,000 years ago), through the Formative and possibly Proto- Historic Periods (ca. 500 years ago). These artifacts were collected primarily by Mr. Bockman from the uplands of the Rio Chama Valley between Española and Ghost Ranch, NM. Mr. Bockman took pains to complete note cards for almost all of his donated collection and to place the location of each find on a 7.5 minute USGS topographic quadrangle map. Of the 336 actual objects in his donated collection, one (#176) consists of a cache of 7 obsidian bifaces and a second (unnumbered) is a sub-assemblage of 11 projectile points. The Bockman Collection contains a good sample (n = 23) of Paleoindian, Late Paleoindian and Early Archaic projectile points and point fragments. Knowing that a large database of similar age points, collected from portions of northern New Mexico and the San Luis Valley of southern Colorado, had been analyzed recently by M. Jodry (Smithsonian Institution) and B. Vierra (formerly of Los Alamos National Laboratory), we sought to perform a similar, but abbreviated, analysis on the early points from the Bockman Collection and compare our findings to the Smithsonian – Los Alamos database.
    [Show full text]
  • Contributions by Employer
    2/4/2019 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT HOME / CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORTS AND DATA / PRESIDENTIAL REPORTS / 2008 APRIL MONTHLY / REPORT FOR C00431569 / CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS BY EMPLOYER HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT PO Box 101436 Arlington, Virginia 22210 FEC Committee ID #: C00431569 This report contains activity for a Primary Election Report type: April Monthly This Report is an Amendment Filed 05/22/2008 EMPLOYER SUM NO EMPLOYER WAS SUPPLIED 6,724,037.59 (N,P) ENERGY, INC. 800.00 (SELF) 500.00 (SELF) DOUGLASS & ASSOCI 200.00 - 175.00 1)SAN FRANCISCO PARATRAN 10.50 1-800-FLOWERS.COM 10.00 101 CASINO 187.65 115 R&P BEER 50.00 1199 NATIONAL BENEFIT FU 120.00 1199 SEIU 210.00 1199SEIU BENEFIT FUNDS 45.00 11I NETWORKS INC 500.00 11TH HOUR PRODUCTIONS, L 250.00 1291/2 JAZZ GRILLE 400.00 15 WEST REALTY ASSOCIATES 250.00 1730 CORP. 140.00 1800FLOWERS.COM 100.00 1ST FRANKLIN FINANCIAL 210.00 20 CENTURY FOX TELEVISIO 150.00 20TH CENTURY FOX 250.00 20TH CENTURY FOX FILM CO 50.00 20TH TELEVISION (FOX) 349.15 21ST CENTURY 100.00 24 SEVEN INC 500.00 24SEVEN INC 100.00 3 KIDS TICKETS INC 121.00 3 VILLAGE CENTRAL SCHOOL 250.00 3000BC 205.00 312 WEST 58TH CORP 2,000.00 321 MANAGEMENT 150.00 321 THEATRICAL MGT 100.00 http://docquery.fec.gov/pres/2008/M4/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html 1/336 2/4/2019 CONTRIBUTIONS FOR HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT 333 WEST END TENANTS COR 100.00 360 PICTURES 150.00 3B MANUFACTURING 70.00 3D INVESTMENTS 50.00 3D LEADERSHIP, LLC 50.00 3H TECHNOLOGY 100.00 3M 629.18 3M COMPANY 550.00 4-C (SOCIAL SERVICE AGEN 100.00 402EIGHT AVE CORP 2,500.00 47 PICTURES, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION of the ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with Cont
    THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell K with contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I THE ARCHAIC OCCUPATION OF THE ROSEMONT AREA, NORTHERN SANTA RITA MOUNTAINS, SOUTHEASTERN ARIZONA by Bruce B. Huckell Contributions by Lisa W. Huckell Robert S. Thompson Submitted by Cultural Resource Management Division Arizona State Museum University of Arizona Prepared for ANAMAX Mining Company 1984 Archaeological Series No. 147, Vol. I CONTENTS FIGURES vii TABLES PREFACE xiii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xvi ABSTRACT xviii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION 1 The Archaic Period 2 Previous Research 5 2. THE ENVIRONMENT OF THE ROSEMONT AREA AND SURROUNDING REGIONS 11 General Geography 11 Geology 13 Climate 17 Vegetation 19 Fauna 28 The Paleoenvironment 29 Recent Changes in the Local Biotic Communities 30 Long-Term Changes in the Environment 32 3. A FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCH AT THE ROSEMONT ARCHAIC SITES 35 Hunter-Gatherer Organization 35 Research Domains 38 Problem Domain I: Subsistence-Settlement Systems 38 Problem Domain II: Cultural and Temporal Affinities 40 Site Selection 41 4. INVESTIGATIONS AT AND DESCRIPTIONS OF THE SITES 43 Field Methods 43 Results of Excavations: Site Descriptions 46 AZ EE:2:62--The Wasp Canyon Site 48 Investigation 50 Features 52 Structures 52 Rock Clusters 56 Artifacts 58 iii iv Contents AZ EE:2:65 59 Investigation 59
    [Show full text]
  • Saving Ice Patch Artifacts Saving Ice Patch Artifacts
    CHACO’S UPPER CLASS • DID THE CLOVIS HAVE NEIGHBORS? • A HIGHWAY TO PREHISTORY american archaeologyWINTER 2015-16 americana quarterly publication archaeology Vol. 19 No. 4 of The Archaeological Conservancy SavingSaving IceIce PatchPatch ArtifactsArtifacts $3.95 american archaeologyWINTER 2015-16 a quarterly publication of The Archaeological Conservancy Vol. 19 No. 4 COVER FEATURE 12 ARCHAEOLOGY IN THE ICE PATCHES BY TAMARA STEWART Archaeologists are racing to preserve fragile artifacts that are exposed when ice patches melt. 19 THE ROAD TO PREHISTORY BY ELIZABETH LUNDAY A highway-expansion project in Texas led to the discovery of several ancient Caddo sites and raised issues about preservation. 26 CHACO’S UPPER CLASS EE L BY CHARLES C. POLING New research suggests an elite class emerged at RAIG C / Chaco Canyon much earlier than previously thought. AAR NST 32 DID THE CLOVIS PEOPLE HAVE NEIGHBORS? I 12 BY MARCIA HILL GOSSARD Discoveries from the Cooper’s Ferry site indicate that two different cultures inhabited North America 44 new acquisition roughly 13,000 years ago. CONSERVANCY ACQUIRES A PORTION OF MANZANARES PUEBLO IN NEW MEXICO 38 LIFE ON THE NORTHERN FRONTIER Manzanares is one of the sites included in the Galisteo BY WAYNE CURTIS Basin Archaeological Sites Protection Act. Researchers are trying to understand what life was like at an English settlement in southern Maine around 46 new acquisition the turn of the 18th century. DONATION OF TOWN SQUARE BANK MOUND UNITES LOCAL COMMUNITY Various people played a role in the Conservancy’s 19 acquisition of a prehistoric mound. 47 point acquisition A LONG TIME COMING The Conservancy waited for 20 years to acquire T the Dingfelder Circle.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring and Discovery Plan
    A CULTURAL RESOURCES MONITORING AND DISCOVERY PLAN FOR MAINTENANCE AND MINOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AT EXISTING WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION–DESERT SOUTHWEST REGION TRANSMISSION LINES, FACILITIES, AND PROPERTIES IN ARIZONA Prepared for: Western Area Power Administration Desert Southwest Region 615 S. 43rd Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85005 Prepared by: Christopher E. Rayle, MA, RPA Cara Lonardo Environmental Planning Group, LLC 4141 N. 32nd Street, Suite 102 Phoenix, Arizona 85018 EPG Cultural Resource Service Technical Paper No. 2013-11 August 2014 This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Introduction ...................................................................................................................................1 Culture History of Arizona ...........................................................................................................5 Anticipated Resource Types .........................................................................................................6 Research Design............................................................................................................................7 Research Theme 1: Chronology...........................................................................................7 Research Theme 2: Social Organization and Interaction .....................................................8 Research Theme
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of New Mexico
    MUSEUM OF NEW MEXICO OFFICE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES A DATA RECOVERY PLAN FOR LA 9075, ALONG NM 53, CIBOLA COUNTY, NEW MEXICO Stephen C. Lentz Submitted by Yvonne R. Oakes Principal Investigator ARCHAEOLOGY NOTES 270 SANTA FE 2000 NEW MEXICO ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY The Archaeological Site Stabilization and Preservation Project (ASSAPP), Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico, conducted a site evaluation of LA 9075 (the La Vega site), a large multicomponent site along NM 53 in Cibola County, New Mexico, on private lands and highway right-of-way. The New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department (NMSHTD) proposes to stabilize areas within the boundaries of the site and within the NMSHTD right-of-way that have been or may be affected by erosion. The Office of Archaeological Studies has been working under contract with the NMSHTD to identify endangered archaeological sites within highway rights-of-way. Subsequent to shoulder construction and improvement by the NMSHTD, additional cultural resources were exposed within the Museum’s project area. The OAS/ASSAPP program identified five major areas within the highway right-of-way at LA 9075 where cultural resources are threatened by erosion. These areas have been targeted for stabilization. In conjunction with the NMSHTD, District 6, the OAS proposes to conduct a data recovery program on the affected areas prior to stabilization efforts. NMSHTD Project No. TPE-7700 (14), CN 9163 MNM Project No. 41.596 (Archaeological Site Stabilization and Protection Project) Submitted in fulfillment of Joint Powers Agreement J0089-95 between the New Mexico State Highway and Transportation Department and the Office of Archaeological Studies, Museum of New Mexico.
    [Show full text]