Jpmorgan Chase (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Jpmorgan Chase (PDF) Introduction 1 Resolution Planning and Why JPMorgan Chase Is Resolvable 3 Our Resolution Plan Shows We Can Be Orderly Resolved 5 Our Single Point of Entry Resolution Strategy Enables Orderly Failure Without Government or Taxpayer Support or Harm to the U.S. Economy 14 Our Resolution Plan Is Designed to Meet Real World Challenges 25 FAQs 52 JPMorgan Chase Enhancements to Resolvability 68 Overview of JPMorgan Chase 73 Other Required Financial Information Disclosures in the Public Filing 121 Glossary 135 Introduction Defined terms are capitalized and may be found in the Glossary beginning on page 135. Our 2019 Resolution Plan Public Filing presents a high-level overview of our detailed, confidential resolution plan that we filed with the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, together referred to as the Agencies. Both the Public Filing and our confidential resolution plan provide a roadmap of how our core businesses and operations would continue to operate, or be wound down in an orderly manner, in a resolution event without jeopardizing the economy or global financial markets, or requiring any extraordinary government assistance or taxpayer support. We last submitted a resolution plan in July 2017. In December 2017, the Agencies provided our firm with joint feedback that our July 2017 resolution plan submission adequately remediated the shortcomings they had identified and no further shortcomings or deficiencies were identified. The Agencies also identified four areas common to all U.S. G-SIB filers where more work may be needed to improve the resolvability of firms: intragroup liquidity, internal loss absorbing capacity, derivatives, and payment, clearing and settlement activities. In December 2018, the Agencies jointly issued the Final Guidance, which described the Agencies’ expectations regarding key vulnerabilities in resolution plans and updated aspects of prior guidance. The Final Guidance is organized around a number of key vulnerabilities in resolution: capital; liquidity; governance mechanisms; operational (including payment, clearing and settlement activities); legal entity rationalization and separability; and derivatives and trading activities. We have made key enhancements to better respond to this Final Guidance, including the new requirements, in addition to our own continued efforts to improve our resolvability. We have had constructive dialogue with the Agencies about our efforts to make meaningful resolvability improvements across our firm to ensure that we meet the requirements set out by the Agencies, and we have undertaken specific enhancements in addition to those requirements that are tailored to our particular business model. In developing and delivering this plan, we believe that: our resolution plan responds fully to all feedback received to date from the Agencies and addresses the Final Guidance and the 165(d) Rule; our resolution plan meets the high standards established by our firm for addressing our resolvability; we are well positioned financially with loss absorbing resources and high quality liquid assets to withstand a variety of extreme loss scenarios; we have appropriate triggers, governance and reporting capabilities in place, coupled with the operational capabilities necessary to execute our Single Point of Entry strategy if ever needed; and our resolution-based assumptions and options are appropriately conservative and are meaningfully supported through robust governance, review and challenge. Taken together, we believe that our resolution plan is credible. 1 Introduction This Public Filing provides an expanded overview of: our resolution planning; how JPMorgan Chase is resolvable; frequently asked questions about resolution; key enhancements we have made to JPMorgan Chase’s resolvability; key facts and information about JPMorgan Chase; and other financial information disclosures required for resolution public filings. 2 Resolution Planning and Why JPMorgan Chase Is Resolvable Resolution Planning and Why JPMorgan Chase Is Resolvable TABLE OF CONTENTS Our Resolution Plan Shows We Can Be Orderly Resolved ...................................................................................... 5 Our firm and other systemically important financial institutions can be resolved in an orderly manner. .................. 5 Financial strength supports our resolvability. .......................................................................................................... 5 An orderly resolution requires proper planning. ...................................................................................................... 8 An effective resolution plan must provide a roadmap to key stakeholders for successful implementation in a crisis. .............................................................................................................................................................. 8 Our Single Point of Entry Resolution Strategy Enables Orderly Failure Without Government or Taxpayer Support or Harm to the U.S. Economy ............................................................................................. 14 Single Point of Entry is optimal for resolving large financial institutions in an orderly manner in bankruptcy. ....... 14 Our Single Point of Entry strategy would limit the destabilizing effects of a possible failure by avoiding bankruptcy for the firm’s subsidiaries. ............................................................................................................. 15 Our extensive financial forecasting helps us confirm that our firm has sufficient financial resources to execute Single Point of Entry successfully. ..................................................................................................... 20 Single Point of Entry would result in a simpler and smaller firm. ........................................................................... 22 Our Resolution Plan Is Designed to Meet Real-World Challenges ........................................................................ 25 We have sufficient capital to successfully implement the strategy. ....................................................................... 26 Our liquidity is sufficient to implement our strategy successfully. .......................................................................... 28 Key decision makers throughout the firm understand how to implement our Single Point of Entry strategy in a timely manner. .......................................................................................................................................... 31 Our strategy can withstand legal challenge. ......................................................................................................... 33 Our operations will continue uninterrupted in a crisis. ........................................................................................... 37 We have simplified our structure to support our strategy. ..................................................................................... 42 We have optionality in how our firm could execute divestitures in resolution. ....................................................... 44 We have mitigated challenges to resolution posed by our derivatives portfolio and prime brokerage activities. .......................................................................................................................................................... 47 We cooperate and coordinate with key stakeholders around the world so that they understand and support our Resolution Plan. ........................................................................................................................................ 50 4 Resolution Planning and Why JPMorgan Chase Is Resolvable Our Resolution Plan Shows We Can Be Orderly Resolved Defined terms are capitalized and may be found in the Glossary beginning on page 135. We recognize our responsibility to continually strengthen and health of the U.S. financial system and and safeguard our firm, given its vital role in the United economy; and States and global financial system. This sense of responsibility is embedded in the way we do business, without extraordinary government assistance or any and shapes our day-to-day operations, as well as our taxpayer support. strategic planning for the future. We have continued to make significant changes since our last Resolution Our resolution plan shows how these goals can be Plan—the Public Filing of which is linked here—to ensure achieved for JPMorgan Chase. our resiliency and resolvability. We want to take this opportunity to describe our progress so that our clients, employees and communities can be even more confident Financial strength supports our in us in times of stress. resolvability. Ensuring our resolvability begins with minimizing the risk In this section of this Public Filing, we: of failure. We have substantially strengthened our outline our resolution plan and why we believe it is financial resilience and further reduced the possibility of credible; failure in a financial crisis through many initiatives. Among these efforts has been the accumulation of describe how we have a robust resolution strategy extensive loss absorbing resources. that will shield the U.S. financial system and economy from harm and U.S. taxpayers from losses Successfully executing our Resolution Plans requires in the highly unlikely event of our failure; and maintaining sufficient funding and liquidity to respond to a crisis. We measure our funding and liquidity by
Recommended publications
  • Snapshot of Notable Global COO, CIO and CISO Moves and Appointments
    Snapshot of notable global COO, CIO and CISO moves and appointments September 2016 For the latest EMEA, Americas and Asia Pacific moves across: Analytics Data Corporate Services Cyber-Security Facilities Operations Procurement Technology Vendor Management Snapshot of notable global Operations and Technology moves and appointments Page 1 / 6 Next update due: January 2017 People Moves FS EMEA John Burns, the former CTO of Pioneer Investments, joins Cyril Reol, former Glencore CIO, has joined Man Group Deutsche Bank as Global CIO, COO Asset Management as Deputy CTO. Garry Beaton, former Global Head of Operations at Core Technology . Andrew Brown, former Barclays UK Private Bank Chief of Ashmore, joins the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority as its Tom Waite, joins Deutsche Bank as an MD within Staff, has joined US Expat and Fatca Specialist Maseco Global Head of Operations. electronic trading. Waite joined from Bank of America, Private Wealth as its COO. Lesley Cairney has joined Artemis Investment where he was also an MD. Before that, he was an MD at Ken Moore, former Head of Citi Innovation Labs, joins Management as COO. She was formerly at Henderson Goldman Sachs for six years until May 2014. MasterCard as EVP Labs, running global innovation. Global Investors as COO. Amish Popat joins Dromeus Capital Group as COO from David Grant has joined Nationwide as Head of IT and Lewis Love, the former Global Chief Procurement Officer New Amsterdam Capital, where he was the Finance and Security Risk from Lloyds Banking Group, where he was for Aon has been named as the COO for Bank of Ireland, Operations Manager.
    [Show full text]
  • Eli 022807Me
    ORANGE COUNTY TREASURER-TAX COLLECTOR APPROVED ISSUER LIST COMMERCIAL PAPER / MEDIUM TERM NOTES AS OF: 2/28/2007 CR S/T RATINGS L/T RATINGS PROG RATINGS IND. ISSUER (Shared Structure) # S&P MDY FI S&P MDY FI S&P MDY FI PARENT/ ADMINISTRATOR CODE ADP TAX SERVICES INC 1 A-1+ P-1 NR AAA Aaa NR A-1+ P-1 NR AUTO DATA PROCES 9.4 ALCON CAPITAL CORP 1 A-1+ P-1 NR NR NR NR A-1+ P-1 F1+ NESTLE SA 4.7 AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE 9 A-1 P-1 F1 A+ A1 *+ NR A-1 P-1 F1 AMER HONDA MOTOR 3.3 AMSTERDAM FUNDING CORP 7 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1 P-1 NR ABN AMRO Bank N.V 7.4 AB AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSNG 1 A-1+ P-1 NR AAA Aaa NR A-1+ P-1 NR AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING, INC. 9.4 AQUINAS FUNDING LLC 3 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1+ P-1 NR RABOBANK NEDERLAND 7.4 AB ASPEN FUND (w/ Newport Fund) 3 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1+ P-1 F1+ DEUTSCHE BANK AG 7.4 AB BANK OF AMERICA CORP 5 A-1+ P-1 F1+ AA Aa2 AA A-1+ P-1 F1+ DOMESTIC BANK/FDIC INSURED 7.1 BARCLAYS US FUNDING LLC 4 A-1+ P-1 F1+ AA Aa1 AA+ A-1+ P-1 NR BARCLAYS BK PLC 7.4 BARTON CAPITAL LLC 3 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1+ P-1 NR SOC GENERALE 7.4 AB BEETHOVEN FUNDING CORP 7 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1 P-1 NR DRESDNER BANK, AG 7.4 AB BETA FINANCE INC 1 A-1+ P-1 F1+ AAA Aaa AAA A-1+ P-1 F1+ 7.4 AB BMW US CAPITAL LLC 9 A-1 P-1 NR NR A1 NR A-1 P-1 NR BMW AG 3.3 BNP PARIBAS FINANCE INC 5 A-1+ P-1 F1+ AA Aa2 NR A-1+ P-1 NR BNP PARIBAS 7.4 BRYANT PARK FUNDING LLC 7 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1 P-1 NR HSBC 7.4 AB CALYON NORTH AMERICA INC 6 A-1+ P-1 F1+ AA- Aa2 AA A-1+ P-1 F1+ CALYON 7.1 CATERPILLAR FIN SERV CRP 10 A-1 P-1 F1 A A2 A+ A-1 P-1 F1 CATERPILLAR INC 8.8 CATERPILLAR INC 10 A-1 P-1 F1 A A2 A+ A A2 A+ #N/A N Ap 8.8 CC USA INC 1 A-1+ P-1 NR AAA Aaa NR AAA Aaa NR SECURITY TRUST 7.4 AB CHARIOT FUNDING LLC 7 NR NR NR NR NR NR A-1 P-1 NR JP MORGAN CHASE 7.4 AB CIT GROUP INC 10 A-1 P-1 F1 A A1 A A-1 P-1 F1 #N/A N Ap 7.4 CITIGROUP FUNDING INC 4 A-1+ P-1 F1+ AA Aa1 AA+ A-1+ P-1 F1+ FORMERLY TRAVELERS GROUP INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund
    Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income Fund As of 06/30/2021 Current % of Total Security Name Sector Market Value Market Value Wells Fargo & Company Flt Perp Banking $219,779,776.15 1.81 % Charles Schwab Corp Flt Perp Sr:I Banking $182,681,675.00 1.51 % Bp Capital Markets Plc Flt Perp Energy $158,976,029.00 1.31 % Bank of America 6.25% Banking $148,052,279.38 1.22 % Bank of Amrica 6.10% Banking $144,075,863.52 1.19 % Citigroup Inc Flt Perp Banking $139,736,756.25 1.15 % Emera 6.75% 6/15/76-26 Utilities $134,370,096.24 1.11 % Transcanada Trust 5.875 08/15/76 Pipeline $116,560,837.50 0.96 % JP Morgan 6.75% Banking $116,417,211.75 0.96 % JP Morgan 6.1% Banking $115,050,549.38 0.95 % Credit Suisse Group AG 7.5 Perp Banking $112,489,090.00 0.93 % Enbridge Inc Flt 07/15/80 Sr:20-A Pipeline $101,838,892.50 0.84 % Charles Schwab Corp Flt Perp Sr:G Banking $101,715,980.40 0.84 % Bank of America Corp 5.875% Perp Banking $99,269,540.97 0.82 % Sempra Energy Flt Perp Utilities $97,680,337.50 0.81 % BNP Paribas 7.375% Banking $96,328,288.48 0.79 % Jpmorgan Chase & Co Flt Perp Sr:Kk Banking $95,672,863.00 0.79 % Metlife Capital Trust IV 7.875% Insurance $94,971,600.00 0.78 % Citigroup 5.95% 2025 Call Banking $89,482,599.30 0.74 % Transcanada Trust Flt 09/15/79 Pipeline $88,170,468.75 0.73 % Ally Financial Inc Flt Perp Sr:C Banking $86,422,336.00 0.71 % Banco Santander SA 4.75% Flt Perp Banking $83,189,000.00 0.69 % American Intl Group 8.175% 5/15/58 Insurance $82,027,104.20 0.68 % Prudential Financial 5.625% 6/15/43 Insurance $80,745,314.60 0.67
    [Show full text]
  • JPMS CWM Trading Away Disclosure
    Important Information about Portfolio Managers Trading Away in J.P. Morgan Securities LLC ("JPMS") Wrap Fee Investment Advisory Programs JPMS offers certain wrap-fee investment advisory programs that provide discretionary portfolio management of client assets by affiliated or unaffiliated Portfolio Managers (collectively referred to as “Wrap Fee Programs”). In the Chase Investments division of JPMS, the following Wrap Fee Programs are offered: Chase Strategic Portfolio (“CSP”) Program, J.P. Morgan Core Advisory Portfolio (“JPMCAP”) Program, the Fixed Income Advisory Program, and the Advisory Program. In the J.P. Morgan Securities division of JPMS, the following Wrap Fee Programs are offered: the Strategic Investment Services (“STRATIS”) Program; Investment Counseling Service (“ICS”) Program; Unified Managed Account (“UMA”) Program; Customized Bond Solutions (“C-BoS”) Program; and JPMCAP Program This document provides information to clients, who are participating, or are considering participating, in a Wrap Fee Program, about Portfolio Managers’ placement of client trade orders for execution by broker- dealers other than JPMS. This practice is frequently referred to as “trading away.” The extent to which a Portfolio Manager chooses to trade away from JPMS can affect your total cost of investing in a Wrap Fee Program. When a Portfolio Manager places trades with JPMS for execution in a Wrap Fee Program, your account does not incur any additional costs because trade execution by JPMS is covered by the wrap fee you pay to JPMS. However, when a Portfolio Manager chooses to trade away from JPMS, execution by a broker-dealer other than JPMS is not covered by the wrap fee you pay to JPMS and your account therefore may incur a commission or other additional cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Bank of America Corporation Amicus Brief
    Nos. 19-675 & 19-688 IN THE BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, Respondent. WELLS FARGO & CO., et al., Petitioners, v. CITY OF MIAMI, FLORIDA, Respondent. On Petitions for Writs of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for t he Eleventh Circuit BRIEF OF THE AMERICAN BANKERS ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION, BANK POLICY INSTITUTE, CONSUMER BANKERS ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT COMMUNITY BANKERS OF AMERICA, MORTGAGE BANKERS ASSOCIATION, CREDIT UNION NATIONAL ASSOCIATION AND NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FEDERALLY-INSURED CREDIT UNIONS AS AMICI CURIAE S UPPORT ING PETITIONERS Robert A. Long, Jr. Counsel of Record Jordan V. Hill COVINGTON & BURLING LLP One CityCenter 850 Tenth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001-4956 [email protected] (202) 662-6000 Counsel for Amici Curiae TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ....................................... ii INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ............................... 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 4 ARGUMENT .............................................................. 7 I. This Case Presents an Issue of Exceptional Importance That Warrants This Court’s Review. ........................................ 7 II. The Court of Appeals Failed to Heed This Court’s Decision. ............................................ 10 III. Other Plaintiffs Are Well-Positioned to Enforce the FHA ............................................ 13 CONCLUSION ......................................................... 17 i ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) Cases Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983) ................................ 6 Bank of America v. City of Miami, Florida, 137 S. Ct. 1296 (2017) ..................................... passim City of Miami Gardens, v. Bank of America Corp., No. 1:14-cv-22202 (S.D. Fla., filed June 13, 2014) ............................................................ 7 City of Miami Gardens v. Citigroup, Inc., No. 1:14-cv-22204 (S.D.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Morgan and the Money Trust
    FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF ST. LOUIS ECONOMIC EDUCATION The Panic of 1907: J.P. Morgan and the Money Trust Lesson Author Mary Fuchs Standards and Benchmarks (see page 47) Lesson Description The Panic of 1907 was a financial crisis set off by a series of bad banking decisions and a frenzy of withdrawals caused by public distrust of the banking system. J.P. Morgan, along with other wealthy Wall Street bankers, loaned their own funds to save the coun- try from a severe financial crisis. But what happens when a single man, or small group of men, have the power to control the finances of a country? In this lesson, students will learn about the Panic of 1907 and the measures Morgan used to finance and save the major banks and trust companies. Students will also practice close reading to analyze texts from the Pujo hearings, newspapers, and reactionary articles to develop an evidence- based argument about whether or not a money trust—a Morgan-led cartel—existed. Grade Level 10-12 Concepts Bank run Bank panic Cartel Central bank Liquidity Money trust Monopoly Sherman Antitrust Act Trust ©2015, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Permission is granted to reprint or photocopy this lesson in its entirety for educational purposes, provided the user credits the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, www.stlouisfed.org/education. 1 Lesson Plan The Panic of 1907: J.P. Morgan and the Money Trust Time Required 100-120 minutes Compelling Question What did J.P. Morgan have to do with the founding of the Federal Reserve? Objectives Students will • define bank run, bank panic, monopoly, central bank, cartel, and liquidity; • explain the Panic of 1907 and the events leading up to the panic; • analyze the Sherman Antitrust Act; • explain how monopolies worked in the early 20th-century banking industry; • develop an evidence-based argument about whether or not a money trust—a Morgan-led cartel—existed • explain how J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Q21 Earnings Press Release
    JPMorgan Chase & Co. 383 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10179-0001 NYSE symbol: JPM www.jpmorganchase.com JPMORGAN CHASE REPORTS SECOND-QUARTER 2021 NET INCOME OF $11.9 BILLION ($3.78 PER SHARE) SECOND-QUARTER 2021 RESULTS1 ROE 18% CET1 Capital Ratios3 Net payout LTM4,5 ROTCE2 23% Std. 13.0% | Adv. 13.8% 45% n Reported revenue of $30.5 billion; managed revenue Jamie Dimon, Chairman and CEO, commented on the financial results: “JPMorgan of $31.4 billion2 Chase delivered solid performance across our businesses as we generated over $30 billion in revenue while continuing to make significant investments in technology, Credit costs net benefit of $2.3 billion included $3.0 people and market expansion. This quarter we once again benefited from a significant n reserve release as the environment continues to improve, but as we have said before, we Firmwide billion of net reserve releases and $734 million of net do not consider these core or recurring profits. Our earnings, not including the reserve Metrics charge-offs release, were $9.6 billion. Consumer and wholesale balance sheets remain 6 exceptionally strong as the economic outlook continues to improve. In particular, net n Average loans flat; average deposits up 23% charge-offs, down 53%, were better than expected, reflecting the increasingly healthy condition of our customers and clients.” $1.6 trillion of liquidity sources, including HQLA and n 7 unencumbered marketable securities Dimon continued: “In Consumer & Community Banking, combined debit and credit card spend was up 45%, or up 22% versus the more normal, pre-pandemic second n Average deposits up 25%; client investment assets up quarter of 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • JP Morgan Investment Management Inc. | Client Relationship Summary
    J.P. MORGAN INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INC. JULY 9, 2021 Client Relationship Summary The best relationships are built on trust and transparency. That’s why, at J.P. Morgan Investment Management Inc. (“JPMIM”, “our”, “we”, or “us”), we want you to fully understand the ways you can invest with us. This Form CRS gives you important information about our wrap fee programs, short-term fixed income and private equity separately managed accounts (“SMAs”). We are registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser. Brokerage and investment advisory services and fees differ, and it is important for retail investors (“you”) to understand the differences. Free and simple tools are available for you to research firms and financial professionals at Investor.gov/CRS, which also provides educational materials about broker-dealers, investment advisers, and investing. WHAT INVESTMENT SERVICES AND ADVICE CAN YOU PROVIDE ME? We have minimum account requirements, and for Private Equity SMAs, Wrap Fee and Other Similar Managed Account Programs clients must generally satisfy certain investor sophistication requirements. We offer investment advisory services to retail investors through SMAs More detailed information about our services is available at available within wrap fee and other similar managed account programs. www.jpmorgan.com/form-crs-adv. These programs are offered by certain financial institutions, including our affiliates ("Sponsors"). Depending on the SMA strategy, these accounts invest in individual securities (such as stocks and bonds), exchange-traded funds CONVERSATION STARTERS (“ETFs”) and/or mutual funds. Throughout this Client Relationship Summary we’ve included When we act as your discretionary investment manager, you give us “Conversation Starters.” These are questions that the SEC thinks you authority to make investment and trading decisions for your account without should consider asking your financial professional.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard Settlement Instructions
    STANDARD SETTLEMENT INSTRUCTIONS For Account of: Bank Leumi (UK) PLC SWIFT: LUMIGB22WES Further Credit to: Your beneficiary account name & number in full AUD - AUSTRALIAN DOLLAR Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX Cover Through: Australia and New Zealand Banking Group SWIFT: ANZBAU3MXXX CAD – CANADIAN DOLLAR Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX Cover Through: Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto SWIFT: ROYCCAT2XXX CHF – SWISS FRANC Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX Cover Through: UBS Switzerland AG, Zurich SWIFT: UBSWCHZH80A CNY - CHINESE YUAN RENMINBI Pay to Bank: Hongkong & Shanghai Banking, Hong Kong SWIFT: HSBCHKHHHKH CZK – CZECH KORUNA Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX Cover Through: Ceskoslovenska Obchodni Banka AS, Prague SWIFT: CEKOCZPPXXX DKK – DANISH KRONE Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX EUR – EURO Pay to Bank: J.P. Morgan AG. Frankfurt SWIFT: CHASDEFXXXX EUR – EURO Pay to Bank: J.P. Morgan AG. Frankfurt SWIFT: CHASDEFXXXX 1 STANDARD SETTLEMENT INSTRUCTIONS For Account of: Bank Leumi (UK) PLC SWIFT: LUMIGB22WES Further Credit to: Your beneficiary account name & number in full GBP – STERLING (CHAPS / UK SETTLEMENTS) Sort Code: 30-14-95 GBP – STERLING (INTERNATIONAL) Pay to Bank: HSBC, London SWIFT: MIDLGB22XXX HKD – HONG KONG DOLLAR Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX Cover Through: JPMorgan Chase Bank, Hong Kong Branch SWIFT: CHASHKHHXXX HUF – HUNGARIAN FORINT Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. London SWIFT: CHASGB2LXXX Cover Through: UniCredit Bank Hungary SWIFT: BACXHUHBXXX ILS – ISRAELI SHEKEL Pay to Bank: Bank Leumi Le-Israel BM, Tel Aviv SWIFT: LUMIILITXXX JPY – JAPANESE YEN Pay to Bank: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
    [Show full text]
  • XS2075811948 Final Terms
    S&S DRAFT: 29 OCTOBER 2019 FINAL TERMS PROHIBITION OF SALES TO EEA RETAIL INVESTORS – The Notes are not intended to be offered, sold or otherwise made available to and should not be offered, sold or otherwise made available to any retail investor in the European Economic Area (“EEA”). For these purposes, a retail investor means a person who is one (or more) of: (i) a retail client as defined in point (11) of Article 4(1) of Directive 2014/65/EU (as amended, “MiFID II”); or (ii) a customer within the meaning of Directive 2016/97/EU (as amended or superseded, the “Insurance Distribution Directive”), where that customer would not qualify as a professional client as defined in point (10) of Article 4(1) of MiFID II. Consequently no key information document required by Regulation (EU) No 1286/2014 (as amended, the “PRIIPs Regulation”) for offering or selling the Notes or otherwise making them available to retail investors in the EEA has been prepared and therefore offering or selling the Notes or otherwise making them available to any retail investor in the EEA may be unlawful under the PRIIPs Regulation. MIFID II PRODUCT GOVERNANCE / PROFESSIONAL INVESTORS AND ECPS ONLY TARGET MARKET: SOLELY FOR THE PURPOSES OF THE MANUFACTURER’S PRODUCT APPROVAL PROCESS, THE TARGET MARKET ASSESSMENT IN RESPECT OF THE NOTES HAS LED TO THE CONCLUSION THAT: (A) THE TARGET MARKET FOR THE NOTES IS ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTIES AND PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS ONLY, EACH AS DEFINED IN DIRECTIVE 2014/65/EU (AS AMENDED, “MIFID II”); AND (B) ALL CHANNELS FOR DISTRIBUTION OF THE NOTES TO ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTIES AND PROFESSIONAL CLIENTS ARE APPROPRIATE.
    [Show full text]
  • Settlement Banks for FX and MM Transactions, Options and Derivatives
    Settlement Banks for FX and MM Transactions, Options and Derivatives Cou ntry: Currency: Correspondent Bank: SWIFT: Australia AUD National Australia Bank Ltd., Me lbourne NATAAU33033 Acc. 1803012548500 Bulgaria BGN Unicredit Bulbank AD, Sofia UNCRBGSF IBAN BG42UNCR96601030696607 Canada CAD Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto ROYCCAT2 Acc. 095912454619 SYDBANK A/S China CNY Standard Chartered Bank Ltd., Hong Kong SCBLHKHH Acc. 44709448980 Czech R epublic CZK Unicredit Bank Czech Republic AS , Prague BACXCZPP IBAN: CZ242700000000008166802 8 Acc. 81668028 Denmark DKK Danmarks Nationa lbank, Copenhagen DKNBDKKK Acc. 1115 -4 IBAN DK0910050000011154 Euroland EUR Commerzbank A G, Frankfurt COBADEFF Acc. 4008724346 IBAN DE 83500400000872434600 Hong Kong HKD Stan dard Chartered, Hong Kong SCBLHKHH Acc. 44708122739 Hungary HUF OTP Bank PLC , Budapest OTPVHUHB IBAN: HU66117820078102030800000000 Iceland ISK NBI HF NBIIISRE IBAN: IS230100270912726805925439 India INR Standard Chartered Bank , New Delhi SCBLINBB Acc. 222 -0-523804 -8 Indonesia IDR Standard Chartered Bank, Jakarta SCBLIDJX Japan JPY Bank of Tokyo -Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd , Tokyo BOTKJPJT Acc. 653 -0440973 Kenya KES Kenya Commercial Bank, Nairobi KCBLKENX Mexico MXN BBVA Bancomer S.A., Mexico BCMRMXMMCOR Acc. 0095001475 Morocco MAD Banque Marocaine du Commerce Extérieur, Cass ablanca BMCEMAMC New Ze aland NZD ANZ National Bank Ltd , Wellin gton ANZBNZ22058 Acc. 266650 -00001 NZD NO.1 Nor way NOK DNB Nor Bank ASA , Oslo DNBANOKK IBAN: NO32 70010213124 Acc. 7001.02.13124 Valid from: 24.02.2021 Sydbank A/S, CVR No DK 12626509, Aabenraa www.sydbank.com Page: 1/2 Settlement Banks for FX and MM Transactions, Options and Derivatives Cou ntry: Currency: Correspondent Bank: SWIFT: Poland PLN Bank Millennium SA, Warsaw BIGBPLPW IBAN PL 02116022020000000039897935 Romania RO N UniCredit Tiriac Bank SA, Bucharest BACXROBU IBAN RO65B ACX0000000001413310 Saudi Arabia SAR Saudi British Bank, Riyadh SABBSARI Acc.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report (PDF)
    Our Commitment WELLS FARGO & COMPANY ANNUAL REPORT 2016 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Contents 2 | Letter from Chairman of the Board 4 | Letter from Chief Executive Officer and President 14 | Demonstrating Our Commitment 14 | Homeownership: More than a dream 16 | Journey through retirement 18 | A prescription for caring 20 | Bringing bankers to the kitchen table 22 | A home for hope 24 | Building with smart technology 26 | Helping create affordable housing 28 | A future of efficient freight 30 | A bank for life 32 | Operating Committee and Other Corporate Officers 33 | Board of Directors 34 | 2016 Corporate Social Responsibility Performance 35 | 2016 Financial Report - Financial review - Controls and procedures - Financial statements - Report of independent registered public accounting firm 273 | Stock Performance 2 2016 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Fellow Shareholders, Since 1852, Wells Fargo has worked to earn customers’ trust We have enforced senior management accountability by meeting their financial needs and helping them succeed for the damage to Wells Fargo’s reputation through very financially, while maintaining the highest standards of significant compensation actions. The Board accepted integrity. That is why my fellow Board members and I were John Stumpf’s recommendation to forfeit all of his unvested deeply troubled that Wells Fargo violated that trust by equity of approximately $41 million prior to his retirement opening accounts for certain retail banking customers that as Chairman and CEO. The Board required Carrie Tolstedt, they did not request or in some cases even know about. the departed head of Community Banking, to forfeit all This behavior is unacceptable, not only to the Board but of her approximately $19 million of unvested equity.
    [Show full text]