DOCSLIB.ORG

A13-15 Colestilan – Benefit Assessment According 1 to § 35A Social Code Book V

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A13-15 Colestilan – Benefit Assessment According 1 to § 35A Social Code Book V IQWiG Reports – Commission No. A13-15 Colestilan – Benefit assessment according 1 to § 35a Social Code Book V Extract 1 Translation of Sections 2.1 to 2.6 of the dossier assessment “Colestilan – Nutzenbewertung gemäß § 35a SGB V” (Version 1.0; Status: 27 June 2013). Please note: This translation is provided as a service by IQWiG to English-language readers. However, solely the German original text is absolutely authoritative and legally binding. Extract of dossier assessment A13-15 Version 1.0 Colestilan – Benefit assessment acc. to § 35a Social Code Book V 27 June 2013 Publishing details Publisher: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Topic: Colestilan – Benefit assessment according to § 35a Social Code Book V Contracting agency: Federal Joint Committee Commission awarded on: 2 April 2013 Internal Commission No.: A13-15 Address of publisher: Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care Im Mediapark 8 (KölnTurm) 50670 Cologne Germany Tel.: +49 (0)221 – 35685-0 Fax: +49 (0)221 – 35685-1 E-Mail: [email protected] Internet: www.iqwig.de Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - i - Extract of dossier assessment A13-15 Version 1.0 Colestilan – Benefit assessment acc. to § 35a Social Code Book V 27 June 2013 Medical and scientific advice: . Georg Schlieper, Rhine-Westphalian Technical University (RWTH), Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany IQWiG thanks the medical and scientific advisor for his contribution to the dossier assessment. However, the advisor was not involved in the actual preparation of the dossier assessment. Individual sections and conclusions in the dossier assessment therefore do not necessarily reflect his opinion. IQWiG employees involved in the dossier assessment:2 . Ulrike Seay . Katharina Biester . Wolfram Groß . Kirsten H. Herrmann . Thomas Kaiser . Florina Kerekes . Corinna Kiefer . Stefan Lhachimi . Anke Schulz . Siw Waffenschmidt Keywords: colestilan, kidney failure – chronic, benefit assessment 2 Due to legal data protection regulations, employees have the right not to be named. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - ii - Extract of dossier assessment A13-15 Version 1.0 Colestilan – Benefit assessment acc. to § 35a Social Code Book V 27 June 2013 Table of contents Page List of tables ............................................................................................................................. iv List of abbreviations ................................................................................................................. v 2 Benefit assessment ............................................................................................................. 1 2.1 Executive summary of the benefit assessment .......................................................... 1 2.2 Research question ....................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Information retrieval and study pool ........................................................................ 7 2.3.1 Studies included ..................................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 Study characteristics ............................................................................................. 10 2.4 Results on added benefit ........................................................................................... 14 2.5 Extent and probability of added benefit ................................................................. 22 2.5.1 Assessment of added benefit at outcome level ..................................................... 22 2.5.2 Overall conclusion on added benefit .................................................................... 24 2.5.3 Extent and probability of added benefit - summary ............................................. 25 2.6 List of included studies ............................................................................................. 26 References for English extract .............................................................................................. 26 Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - iii - Extract of dossier assessment A13-15 Version 1.0 Colestilan – Benefit assessment acc. to § 35a Social Code Book V 27 June 2013 List of tables3 Page Table 2: Therapeutic indication and ACT specified by the G-BA ............................................. 6 Table 3: Characteristics of the studies included by the company – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. calcium acetate (subindication AI) .................................................. 8 Table 4: Study pool – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) ................................................................................................................... 10 Table 5: Characteristics of the studies included – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) .......................................................................... 11 Table 6: Characteristics of the interventions – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) .......................................................................... 12 Table 7: Characteristics of the study population – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) .......................................................................... 13 Table 8: Risk of bias at study level – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) ............................................................................................ 13 Table 9: Matrix of outcomes – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) ............................................................................................ 15 Table 10: Risk of bias at study and outcome level – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII, target population) ........................................ 15 Table 11: Results (dichotomous outcomes) – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) .......................................................................... 17 Table 12: Additional reporting (continuous outcomes) – RCT, direct comparison: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII)..................................................... 21 Table 13: Extent of added benefit at outcome level: colestilan vs. sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII) ............................................................................................ 23 Table 14: Positive and negative effects from the assessment of colestilan compared with sevelamer hydrochloride (subindication AII, target population) ............................................. 24 Table 15: Colestilan: extent and probability of added benefit ................................................. 25 3 Table numbers start with “2” as numbering follows that of the full dossier assessment. Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - iv - Extract of dossier assessment A13-15 Version 1.0 Colestilan – Benefit assessment acc. to § 35a Social Code Book V 27 June 2013 List of abbreviations Abbreviation Meaning ACT appropriate comparator therapy AE adverse event CKD chronic kidney disease CKD 5D CKD stage 5 with haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis G-BA Gemeinsamer Bundesausschuss (Federal Joint Committee) IQWiG Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen (Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care) PT preferred term RCT randomized controlled trial SAE serious adverse event SGB Sozialgesetzbuch (Social Code Book) SPC Summary of Product Characteristics Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) - v - Extract of dossier assessment A13-15 Version 1.0 Colestilan – Benefit assessment acc. to § 35a Social Code Book V 27 June 2013 2 Benefit assessment 2.1 Executive summary of the benefit assessment Background In accordance with § 35a Social Code Book (SGB) V, the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) commissioned the Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG) to assess the benefit of the drug colestilan. The assessment was based on a dossier compiled by the pharmaceutical company (hereinafter abbreviated to “the company”). The dossier was sent to IQWiG on 2 April 2013. Research question The aim of this report is to assess the added benefit of colestilan for the treatment of hyperphosphataemia in adult patients with chronic kidney disease receiving haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis (hereinafter referred to as CKD 5D). According to the G-BA's specification, 2 subindications are differentiated and the following appropriate comparator therapies (ACTs) are used for them: . Patients without contraindications to calcium- or aluminium-based phosphate binders: calcium- or aluminium-based phosphate binders alone or in combination (subindication AI) . Patients in whom calcium- and aluminium-based phosphate binders (also in combination) are contraindicated according to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC) (e.g. in hypercalcaemia): sevelamer or lanthanum carbonate (subindication AII) In its dossier, the company concurred with the G-BA's specification with regards to the drugs (calcium acetate for subindication AI, sevelamer hydrochloride for subindication AII). When delimiting the subindications, the company deviated in so far as it
Load more

Recommended publications
  • How to Take Your Phosphate Binders
    How to take your phosphate binders Information for renal patients Oxford Kidney Unit Page 2 What are phosphate binders? To reduce the amount of phosphate you absorb from your food you may have been prescribed a medicine called a phosphate binder. Phosphate binders work by binding (attaching) to some of the phosphate in food. This will reduce the amount of phosphate being absorbed into your blood stream. A list of phosphate binders and how to take them is shown below. Phosphate binder How to take it Calcichew (calcium carbonate) Chew thoroughly 10-15 minutes before or immediately before food Renacet (calcium acetate) Phosex (calcium acetate) Osvaren (calcium acetate and magnesium carbonate) Swallow whole after the first Renagel 2-3 mouthfuls of food (sevelemer hydrochloride) Renvela tablets (sevelemer carbonate) Alucaps (aluminium hydroxide) Renvela powder Dissolve in 60ml of water and (sevelemer carbonate) take after the first 2-3 mouthfuls of food Fosrenol tablets Chew thoroughly towards the (lanthanum carbonate) end/immediately after each meal Fosrenol powder Mix with a small amount of (lanthanum carbonate) food and eat immediately Velphoro Chew thoroughly after the first (sucroferric oxyhydroxide) 2-3 mouthfuls The phosphate binder you have been prescribed is: ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. Page 3 How many phosphate binders should I take? You should follow the dose that has been prescribed for you. Your renal dietitian can advise how best to match your phosphate binders to your meal pattern, as well as which snacks require a phosphate binder. What happens if I forget to take my phosphate binder? For best results, phosphate binders should be taken as instructed.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Lanthanum Carbonate and Calcium Acetate in the Treatment of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients of Chronic Kidney Disease P
    Research Article Effect of lanthanum carbonate and calcium acetate in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients of chronic kidney disease P. Thomas Scaria, Reneega Gangadhar1, Ramdas Pisharody2 ABSTRACT OObjectives:bjectives: The tolerability and efficacy of lanthanum carbonate has not been studied in the Indian population. This study was, therefore, undertaken to compare the efficacy and tolerability of lanthanum carbonate with calcium acetate in patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease. Departments of Pharmacology and DDesign:esign: A randomized open label two group cross-over study. Therapeutics, Government Medical MMaterialsaterials aandnd MMethods:ethods: Following Institutional Ethics Committee approval and valid College, Thiruvananthapuram, consent, patients with stage 4 chronic kidney disease were randomized to receive either 1 Pharmacology, Government lanthanum carbonate 500 mg thrice daily or calcium acetate 667 mg thrice daily for Medical College, Kottayam, 4 weeks. After a 4-week washout period, the patients were crossed over for another 2Nephrology, Government Medical College, Thiruvananthapuram, 4 weeks. Serum phosphorous, serum calcium, serum alkaline phosphatase, and serum Kerala, India creatinine were estimated at fixed intervals. RResults:esults: Twenty-six patients were enrolled in the study. The mean serum phosphorous RReceived:eceived: 28.03.2008 concentrations showed a declining trend with lanthanum carbonate (from pre-drug levels of RRevised:evised: 12.07.2008 7.88 ± 1.52 mg/dL-7.14 ± 1.51 mg/dL) and calcium acetate (from pre-drug levels of 7.54 ± AAccepted:ccepted: 11.07.2009 1.39 mg/dL-6.51 ± 1.38 mg/dL). A statistically significant difference was seen when comparing the change in serum calcium produced by these drugs (P < 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Fosrenol-Pm-En.Pdf
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION FOSRENOL® lanthanum carbonate hydrate Chewable tablets, 250 mg, 500 mg, 750 mg, and 1000 mg, oral Phosphate binder ATC code: V03A E03 Takeda Canada Inc. Date of Initial Approval: 22 Adelaide Street West, December 14, 2012 Suite 3800 Toronto Ontario M5H 4E3 Date of Revision: January 5, 2021 Submission Control No: 242595 FOSRENOL® and the FOSRENOL Logo are registered trademarks of Shire International Licensing BV, a Takeda company. Takeda® and the Takeda Logo are trademarks of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, used under license. FOSRENOL® Product Monograph Page 1 of 31 RECENT MAJOR LABEL CHANGES Not applicable TABLE OF CONTENTS RECENT MAJOR LABEL CHANGES ............................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................. 2 PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .................................................... 4 1 INDICATIONS ...................................................................................................... 4 1.1 Pediatrics ..................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Geriatrics ..................................................................................................... 4 2 CONTRAINDICATIONS ....................................................................................... 4 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION ....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid Lowering Drugs and Inflammatory Changes: an Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes?
    Annals of Medicine ISSN: 0785-3890 (Print) 1365-2060 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/iann20 Lipid Lowering Drugs and Inflammatory Changes: an Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes? M. Ruscica, N. Ferri, C. Macchi, A. Corsini & C. R. Sirtori To cite this article: M. Ruscica, N. Ferri, C. Macchi, A. Corsini & C. R. Sirtori (2018): Lipid Lowering Drugs and Inflammatory Changes: an Impact on Cardiovascular Outcomes?, Annals of Medicine, DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2018.1498118 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/07853890.2018.1498118 Accepted author version posted online: 06 Jul 2018. Submit your article to this journal View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=iann20 LIPID LOWERING DRUGS AND INFLAMMATORY CHANGES: AN IMPACT ON CARDIOVASCULAR OUTCOMES? M. Ruscica1*, N. Ferri2*, C. Macchi1, A. Corsini1 and C. R. Sirtori3 1Dipartimento di Scienze Farmacologiche e Biomolecolari, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy; 2Dipartimento di Scienze del Farmaco, Università degli Studi di Padova, Padova, Italy; 3Centro Dislipidemie, A.S.S.T. Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy *Both authors contributed equally to this work Corresponding Author: Cesare R. Sirtori [email protected] Abstract Inflammatory changes are responsible for maintenance of the atherosclerotic process and may underlie some of the most feared vascular complications. Among the multiple mechanisms of inflammation, the arterial deposition of lipids and particularly of cholesterol crystals is the one responsible for activation of inflammasome NLRP3, followed by the rise of circulating markers, mainly C-reactive protein (CRP). Elevation of lipoproteins, LDL but also VLDL and remnants, associates with increased inflammatory changes and coronary risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Role of Bile Acids in the Regulation of Food Intake, and Their Dysregulation in Metabolic Disease
    nutrients Review Role of Bile Acids in the Regulation of Food Intake, and Their Dysregulation in Metabolic Disease Cong Xie 1,† , Weikun Huang 1,2,† , Richard L. Young 1,3 , Karen L. Jones 1,4 , Michael Horowitz 1,4, Christopher K. Rayner 1,5 and Tongzhi Wu 1,4,6,* 1 Adelaide Medical School, Center of Research Excellence (CRE) in Translating Nutritional Science to Good Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia; [email protected] (C.X.); [email protected] (W.H.); [email protected] (R.L.Y.); [email protected] (K.L.J.); [email protected] (M.H.); [email protected] (C.K.R.) 2 The ARC Center of Excellence for Nanoscale BioPhotonics, Institute for Photonics and Advanced Sensing, School of Physical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide 5005, Australia 3 Nutrition, Diabetes & Gut Health, Lifelong Health Theme South Australian Health & Medical Research Institute, Adelaide 5005, Australia 4 Endocrine and Metabolic Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5005, Australia 5 Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide 5005, Australia 6 Institute of Diabetes, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Bile acids are cholesterol-derived metabolites with a well-established role in the digestion and absorption of dietary fat. More recently, the discovery of bile acids as natural ligands for the nuclear farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and membrane Takeda G-protein-coupled receptor 5 (TGR5), and Citation: Xie, C.; Huang, W.; Young, the recognition of the effects of FXR and TGR5 signaling have led to a paradigm shift in knowledge R.L.; Jones, K.L.; Horowitz, M.; regarding bile acid physiology and metabolic health.
    [Show full text]
  • New Brunswick Drug Plans Formulary
    New Brunswick Drug Plans Formulary August 2019 Administered by Medavie Blue Cross on Behalf of the Government of New Brunswick TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction.............................................................................................................................................I New Brunswick Drug Plans....................................................................................................................II Exclusions............................................................................................................................................IV Legend..................................................................................................................................................V Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) Classification of Drugs A Alimentary Tract and Metabolism 1 B Blood and Blood Forming Organs 23 C Cardiovascular System 31 D Dermatologicals 81 G Genito Urinary System and Sex Hormones 89 H Systemic Hormonal Preparations excluding Sex Hormones 100 J Antiinfectives for Systemic Use 107 L Antineoplastic and Immunomodulating Agents 129 M Musculo-Skeletal System 147 N Nervous System 156 P Antiparasitic Products, Insecticides and Repellants 223 R Respiratory System 225 S Sensory Organs 234 V Various 240 Appendices I-A Abbreviations of Dosage forms.....................................................................A - 1 I-B Abbreviations of Routes................................................................................A - 4 I-C Abbreviations of Units...................................................................................A
    [Show full text]
  • In-Class Targeted Therapies That Advance Patient Care
    Passionately committed to improving the lives of patients by discovering, developing and commercializing first- in-class targeted therapies that advance patient care November 2020 Forward-Looking Statements To the extent that statements contained in this presentation are not descriptions of historical facts regarding Ardelyx, they are forward-looking statements reflecting the current beliefs and expectations of management made pursuant to the safe harbor of the Private Securities Reform Act of 1995, including statements regarding the potential for Ardelyx’s product candidates in treating the diseases and conditions for which they are being developed; Ardelyx’s expectation regarding the potential approval of its NDA for tenapanor for the control of serum phosphorus in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients on dialysis and the expected timing thereof; the commercial potential for tenapanor for the control of serum phosphorus in CKD patients on dialysis, including Ardelyx’s expectation regarding the rate of adoption and use of tenapanor, if approved; Ardelyx’s expectations regarding the size of the patient population and the size of the market for tenapanor in CKD patients on dialysis, and the potential growth thereof; and Ardelyx’s expectations regarding the exhaustion of its current capital resources. Such forward-looking statements involve substantial risks and uncertainties that could cause the development of Ardelyx’s product candidates or Ardelyx's future results, performance or achievements to differ significantly from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, among others, the uncertainties inherent in research and the clinical development process; the uncertainties associated with the regulatory approval process; and the uncertainties in the drug commercialization process.
    [Show full text]
  • )&F1y3x PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to THE
    )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE )&f1y3X PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 3 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names (INN) which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS) registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known. Product CAS No. Product CAS No. ABAMECTIN 65195-55-3 ACTODIGIN 36983-69-4 ABANOQUIL 90402-40-7 ADAFENOXATE 82168-26-1 ABCIXIMAB 143653-53-6 ADAMEXINE 54785-02-3 ABECARNIL 111841-85-1 ADAPALENE 106685-40-9 ABITESARTAN 137882-98-5 ADAPROLOL 101479-70-3 ABLUKAST 96566-25-5 ADATANSERIN 127266-56-2 ABUNIDAZOLE 91017-58-2 ADEFOVIR 106941-25-7 ACADESINE 2627-69-2 ADELMIDROL 1675-66-7 ACAMPROSATE 77337-76-9 ADEMETIONINE 17176-17-9 ACAPRAZINE 55485-20-6 ADENOSINE PHOSPHATE 61-19-8 ACARBOSE 56180-94-0 ADIBENDAN 100510-33-6 ACEBROCHOL 514-50-1 ADICILLIN 525-94-0 ACEBURIC ACID 26976-72-7 ADIMOLOL 78459-19-5 ACEBUTOLOL 37517-30-9 ADINAZOLAM 37115-32-5 ACECAINIDE 32795-44-1 ADIPHENINE 64-95-9 ACECARBROMAL 77-66-7 ADIPIODONE 606-17-7 ACECLIDINE 827-61-2 ADITEREN 56066-19-4 ACECLOFENAC 89796-99-6 ADITOPRIM 56066-63-8 ACEDAPSONE 77-46-3 ADOSOPINE 88124-26-9 ACEDIASULFONE SODIUM 127-60-6 ADOZELESIN 110314-48-2 ACEDOBEN 556-08-1 ADRAFINIL 63547-13-7 ACEFLURANOL 80595-73-9 ADRENALONE
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphate Binders
    Pharmacy Info Sheet Phosphate Binders calcium acetate, calcium carbonate (Tums, Calsan, Apocal, Ocal), calcium liquid, aluminum hydroxide (Basaljel, Amphojel), sevelamer (Renagel), lanthanum (Fosrenol) What it does: Phosphate binders are used to treat high Special considerations for lanthamum and blood phosphorus levels. sevelamer: Calcium acetate, calcium carbonate, calcium Lanthanum should be taken during or liquid, aluminum hydroxide, lanthanum and immediately after a meal. Taking a dose on an sevelamer bind dietary phosphate. When the empty stomach can cause nausea and kidneys fail, phosphorus builds up in the body vomiting. Chew the tablet completely before because the kidneys can no longer remove swallowing. DO NOT swallow tablets whole. much phosphorus. Phosphate binders are used to lower the amount of phosphorus Sevelamer should be taken just before eating. absorbed from food to limit development of Swallow the tablet whole – Renagel should not bone and blood vessel disease. be cut or chewed. The contents of sevelamer tablets expand in water and could cause Aluminum hydroxide and calcium carbonate choking if cut chewed or crushed. may also be prescribed as antacids. Calcium preparations may also be prescribed as Phosphate binders may interfere with the calcium supplements. Use them only as absorption of certain drugs such as iron prescribed. When these medications are supplements, antibiotics, digoxin, ranitidine, prescribed as calcium supplements or antiseizure, and antiarrhythmic medications. antacids, take between meals. If you are prescribed any of these drugs, take them at least 1 hour before or 3 hours after your How it works: phosphate binder. Kidney disease can cause phosphate to accumulate which results in bone and blood What to do if you miss a dose: vessel disease.
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • Bright Pleiotropic Properties in Renal Failure and Dialysis Patients
    Open Access http://www.jparathyroid.com Journal of Journal of Parathyroid Disease 2012,2(2),75–77 Hypothesis Beyond the phosphate binding effect of sevelamer; bright pleiotropic properties in renal failure and dialysis patients Mahmoud Rafieian-Kopaei1, Saeed Mardani2, Hamid Nasri3*, Seyed Seifollah Beladi Mousavi4 hree main mechanisms are responsible for Implication for health policy/practice/research/ hyperphosphatemia, firstly an impaired renal medical education phosphate excretion due to acute or chronic In addition to its labeled property of serum phosphate Trenal insufficiency, secondly a massive acute phosphate reduction in hemodialysis individuals, sevelamer may load, and finally a primary increase in renal phosphate have further effects on factors influencing vascular reabsorption (1-3). Hyperphosphatemia in chronic renal endothelium, like inhibition of progression of vascular failure is related with increased cardiovascular mortality calcification, reduction of fibroblast growth factor 23, and morbidity. Lowering the phosphate load and abolishing of circulating inflammatory and oxidative maintaining serum phosphorus levels within the normal molecules, reducing of total and LDL cholesterol, value are important therapeutic aims to improve clinical uric acid, and uremic toxins. Also sevelamer may outcomes in chronic renal failure patients (1-3). Treatment reduce blood absorption of advanced glycation end comprises of lessening intestinal phosphate absorption products and endotoxins from the intestine. Hence, it is affordable to
    [Show full text]
  • Efficacy and Safety of Sucroferric Oxyhydroxide Compared with Sevelamer
    Efficacy and safety of sucroferric oxyhydroxide compared with sevelamer hydrochloride in Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia: A randomised, open-label, multicentre, 12-week Phase III study Running title: Safety and efficacy of PA21 vs sevelamer Fumihiko Koiwa1, Keitaro Yokoyama2,, Masafumi Fukagawa3, Akira Terao4, Tadao Akizawa5 1Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan 2Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan 3Division of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan 4Biostatistics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Josai University, Sakado, Japan 5Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan Corresponding author: Fumihiko Koiwa Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, 1-30 Fujigaoka, Aoba-ku, Yokohama 227-8501, Japan Tel.: +81-45-971-1151 Fax: +81-45-973-3010 Email: [email protected] This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/nep.12891 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Abstract Aim: We aimed to investigate the non-inferiority of PA21 (sucroferric oxyhydroxide) to sevelamer hydrochloride (sevelamer) in terms of efficacy and safety in Japanese haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia. Methods: In this Phase III, open-label, multicentre study, 213 haemodialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia were randomised to PA21 or sevelamer treatment for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was adjusted serum phosphorus concentration at the end of treatment; the non-inferiority of PA21 was confirmed if the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) is ≤0.32 mmol/L.
    [Show full text]