Quebec Bodies of Water:Borders the Gulf of Saint Lawrence Is Southeast

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Quebec Bodies of Water:Borders the Gulf of Saint Lawrence Is Southeast Quebec Bodies of water:borders ● The gulf of saint Lawrence is southeast of it ● Hudson Bay west of it ● James bay to the west of it ● Surrounds the Ungava bay in the north ● Bounded to the north by the Hudson strait Bodies of water: lakes, reservoirs, and RIVERS ● Caniapiscau reservoir(largest lake in Quebec) ○ Outflow of the laforge river ● Lake missantani(largest natural lake in Quebec) ○ Rupert river is primary outflow ● Richmond gulf ○ Settlement of Umiujaq ○ Receives the Clearwater river as major inflow ● Clearwater lakes ○ Second largest natural lake in Quebec ○ They are impact craters ● Lake Saint Jean ○ Outflow is the Saguenay river ○ Inflow is the Peribonka ● Cities: ○ Quebec City ■ Capital City ■ Located at narrowing of St. Lawrence River ■ Cape Diamond ■ Only fortified walls in North America outside of Mexico ■ Founded by Samuel de Champlain ■ Museum of Civilization ■ Château Frontenac (Hotel) ○ Montreal ■ Largest City ■ Located at confluence of St. Lawrence and Ottawa Rivers ■ Lies on its namesake island ■ Other islands include Ile Bizard ■ 1976 Olympic Park ■ Biosphere ○ Gatineau ■ Across the Ottawa River from Ottawa ■ Forms National capital region with Ottawa ○ Sherbrooke ■ Located at confluence of St. Francis and Magog Rivers ■ Capital of Estrie region ○ Saguenay ■ ● Rivers ­ by the chief keith ○ 5 longest ■ St. Lawrence River ■ La Grande River ■ Saguenay River ■ Outouais River ■ Richelieu River ○ Flowing into Ungava Watershed ■ Leaf River ■ Koksoak River ■ Caniapiscau ■ False River ■ George River ■ Arnaud River ● Vachon River ○ Flowing into James Bay ■ Pontax River ■ Eastmain River ■ Harricana River ■ Mississicabi River ■ Broadback River ■ Rupert River ● Nemsicau ■ Nottaway River ● Waswanippi River ● Bell River ○ Flowing into the Hudson Bay ■ From the Richmond Gulf ● De Troyes ● Clearwater ● Riviere du Nord ■ Povungnituk River ■ Kovik River ■ Little Whale River ■ Great Whale River ● St. Denys Mountains!? ○ Torngat Mountains ■ Highest point in range and Quebec is Mount Caubvick ■ Located on Labrador Peninsula ■ Part of Arctic Cordillera ○ Laurentian Mountains ■ Southern part of Quebec ■ Highest point is Mount Raoul Blanchard ■ The Gatineau, L'Assomption, Lièvre, Montmorency, Nord and St. Maurice Rivers rise in this range ○ Otish Mountains ■ Central Quebec ■ North of Manicouagan Reservoir ● Islands ○ Mingan Archipelago ○ Anticosti Island.
Recommended publications
  • Exploring Whapmagoostui Cree Place Names
    The Land as an Aspect of Cree History: Exploring Whapmagoostui Cree Place Names DAVID DENTON Cree Regional Authority, Nemaska, Quebec The Whapmagoostui Crees form a small-scale society that has used the same land for many generations. In this paper1 I will examine the results of a project carried out in the 1990s to compile information concerning historical and cultural knowledge relating to places within the Whapma­ goostui Cree traditional territories. The project involved both a detailed place-names survey and the collection of additional information in the form of stories, myths and land-use data concerning particular named places. Toponymy was seen as a useful starting point for understanding Cree perceptions of the environment and of key points within that envi­ ronment, and for obtaining a broad coverage of places of potential cul­ tural and historic interest, based on the assumption that most such places would be named (cf. Hanks & Winters 1986:274). The place-names survey was carried out with 1:50,000 scale maps using a modified version of the "Nuna-Top method," developed by Ludger and Linna Muller-Wille in arctic Quebec and Nunavut (CPCGN 1992). The team consisted of an interviewer, a recorder and a filing clerk, all Crees from Whapmagoostui with considerable knowledge of local geography and traditions. Interviews were carried out with individuals recognized in the community as likely to be most knowledgeable for dif- 1. Editors' note: This paper was presented at the 37e Congres des Algonquinistes held at the Mus6e Canadien des Civilisations in Gatineau, Quebec in October of 2005 but unac­ countably lost between computers during the editorial process.
    [Show full text]
  • Characteristics and Trends of River Discharge Into Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays, 1964–2000
    2540 JOURNAL OF CLIMATE VOLUME 18 Characteristics and Trends of River Discharge into Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays, 1964–2000 STEPHEN J. DÉRY Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, New York, and Program in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey MARC STIEGLITZ School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia EDWARD C. MCKENNA Albertus Magnus High School, Bardonia, New York ERIC F. WOOD Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey (Manuscript received 24 March 2004, in final form 26 January 2005) ABSTRACT The characteristics and trends of observed river discharge into the Hudson, James, and Ungava Bays (HJUBs) for the period 1964–2000 are investigated. Forty-two rivers with outlets into these bays contribute on average 714 km3 yrϪ1 [ϭ 0.023 Sv (1 Sv ϵ 106 m3 sϪ1)] of freshwater to high-latitude oceans. For the system as a whole, discharge attains an annual peak of 4.2 km3 dayϪ1 on average in mid-June, whereas the minimum of 0.68 km3 dayϪ1 occurs on average during the last week of March. The Nelson River contributes as much as 34% of the daily discharge for the entire system during winter but diminishes in relative importance during spring and summer. Runoff rates per contributing area are highest (lowest) on the eastern (western) shores of the Hudson and James Bays. Linear trend analyses reveal decreasing discharge over the 37-yr period in 36 out of the 42 rivers. By 2000, the total annual freshwater discharge into HJUBs diminished by 96 km3 (Ϫ13%) from its value in 1964, equivalent to a reduction of 0.003 Sv.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrick, Donna, 2003 Language, Politics and Social Interaction in An
    Document generated on 09/29/2021 4:13 p.m. Études/Inuit/Studies PATRICK, Donna, 2003 Language, Politics and Social Interaction in an Inuit Community, Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter, Language, Power and Social Process, 8, 269 pages. Shelley Tulloch Préserver la langue et les savoirs Preserving language and knowledge Volume 29, Number 1-2, 2005 URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/013957ar DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/013957ar See table of contents Publisher(s) Association Inuksiutiit Katimajiit Inc. Centre interuniversitaire d'études et de recherches autochtones (CIÉRA) ISSN 0701-1008 (print) 1708-5268 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this review Tulloch, S. (2005). Review of [PATRICK, Donna, 2003 Language, Politics and Social Interaction in an Inuit Community, Berlin and New York, Mouton de Gruyter, Language, Power and Social Process, 8, 269 pages.] Études/Inuit/Studies, 29(1-2), 365–368. https://doi.org/10.7202/013957ar Tous droits réservés © La revue Études/Inuit/Studies, 2005 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit. Érudit is a non-profit inter-university consortium of the Université de Montréal, Université Laval, and the Université du Québec à Montréal. Its mission is to promote and disseminate research. https://www.erudit.org/en/ inédits, tirés pour la plupart des Archives nationales du Canada et de celles de l'Église anglicane du Canada (General Synod Archives); à cet ensemble s'ajoutent 65 dessins de commande illustrant la vie quotidienne.
    [Show full text]
  • GCC(EI)/CNG 2013-2014 Annual Report
    40th Anniversary of the Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) YEARS 40 of MODERN CREE NATION-BUILDING A Special Tribute to the Trappers Who Stood Up for Our Rights Annual Report 2013-2014 Table of Contents Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) Message from the Grand Chief/Chairman 2 Message from the Deputy Grand Chief/ Vice-Chairman 12 Message from the Executive Director 18 Cree-Canada Relations 20 Cree-Québec Relations & Taxation 28 Natural Resources 43 Operations & Maintenance and Capital Grants 46 International Affairs 47 40th Anniversary of the Grand Council of the Crees (Eeyou Istchee) 52 Roundtable Community Tours 54 Cree Nation Government Message from the Director General 57 Message from the Treasurer 58 Government Services 61 Human Resources 66 Cree Human Resources Development 70 Environment and Remedial Works 83 Culture and Language 91 Capital Works and Services 105 Economic and Sustainable Development 115 Child and Family Services 133 Justice and Correctional Services 141 Eeyou Eenou Police Force 150 Leisure, Sports and Recreation 157 Youth Development 164 Cree Nation Youth Council 173 Cree First Nations – Chiefs and Offices 174 Council/Board Members – Executive/ Executive Committee Members 175 This year’s Annual Report celebrates the 40th year that the GCC(EI) was established through a look back in time. Front Cover Archive Photo: One of GCC’s first meetings held in a classroom by I. La Rusic, courtesy Beesum Communications. Annual Report 2013-2014 1 YEARS 40 of MODERN CREE NATION-BUILDING ᒋᔐᐅᒋᒫᐦᑳᓐ ᐅᑕᔨᒧᐎᓐ ᐁ ᐐᐦᑕᐦᒃ
    [Show full text]
  • Du Sable, Caniapiscau, and Koksoak Rivers
    Du Sable, Caniapiscau, and Koksoak Rivers Du Sable We were lucky to obtain an excellent 1980 trip report from Ed The Du Sable (also known as Sand River) is an important tributary Gertler before we embarked on our trip (Ed lists also Tim of the Caniapiscau River. The Du Sable has been at the heart of a Zecha's brother Terry as a trip participant). Thus, it seems to us geographical and toponymic confusion, both about its source and that ours was the first documented descent of the whole Du about its name. Contrary to the map of Mrs. Mina Adelaine Sable from its source. Benson Hubbard (1908) describing her George River expedition, the ninth report of the Commission on Geography of Canada Caniapiscau (James White, 1911) as well as maps of the province of Quebec The Caniapiscau River is a tributary of the Koksoak River. published by the Ministry of Lands and Forests in 1914 and 1935, Through history, the river was known under different spellings: the Du Sable does not originate at Sand Lake, although both the Kaniapiskau (Albert Peter Low, 1898), Canniappuscaw (William Du Sable and Sand Lake outflows do belong to the Caniapiscau Hendry, 1828) and Caniapuscaw (James Clouston, 1820). The name watershed. The Commission de Géographie du Québec accepted in Cree language means "rocky point". The Inuit call the river the name 'Rivière du Sable' in 1944, replacing the name Sandy Adlait (or Allait) Kuunga (meaning: Indian River). It was also River, in the belief that the river originated from Sand Lake. The known as Wauguash River.
    [Show full text]
  • The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) Electronic Version Obtained from Table of Contents
    The James Bay and Northern Quebec Agreement (JBNQA) Electronic Version obtained from http://www.gcc.ca/ Table of Contents Section Page Map of Territory..........................................................................................................................1 Philosophy of the Agreement...................................................................................................2 Section 1 : Definitions................................................................................................................13 Section 2 : Principal Provisions................................................................................................16 Section 3 : Eligibility ..................................................................................................................22 Section 4 : Preliminary Territorial Description.....................................................................40 Section 5 : Land Regime.............................................................................................................55 Section 6 : Land Selection - Inuit of Quebec,.........................................................................69 Section 7 : Land Regime Applicable to the Inuit..................................................................73 Section 8 : Technical Aspects....................................................................................................86 Section 9 : Local Government over Category IA Lands.......................................................121 Section 10 : Cree
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report on the Pat's Property
    GM 62059 ASSESSMENT REPORT ON THE PAT'S PROPERTY P-ssources NatureIles 2 Noy. Burciu gofla Val-d'Or Assessment Report on the Pat's Property Nunavik, Quebec NTS 35 H/12 Prepared for: Canadian Royalties Inc. Prepared by: D Hr Jean Bernard, B.Sc. November 5, 2005 ilessources naturelles et Faune, Quebec 15 JAN. 2006 Service de la Géoinforrnation GM 6 2 0 5 9 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 1 3.0 ACCESSIBILITY, CLIMATE, LOCAL RESOURCES, INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSIOGRAPHY 6 4.0 REGIONAL GEOLOGY 7 5.0 PROPERTY GEOLOGY 9 6.0 2005 CANADIAN ROYALTIES EXPLORATION PROGRAM 9 7.0 ECONOMIC GEOLOGY 10 7.1 PROSPECTING 10 7.2 SAMPLING METHOD AND APPROACH 10 8.0 ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES, RESULTS AND DATA VERIFICATION 10 9.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Location Map 2 Figure 2 Mineral Deposits and Property Locations, Ungava Area 3 Figure 3 Regional Geology and Mineral Deposits, Ungava Area 4 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 List of Map Designated Units, Pat's Property 5 Table 2-Stratigraphic Formations, Cape Smith Belt 8 Table 3-Summary of Field Work Completed in 2005 9 Table 4 2005 Grab Sample Assay Results, Pat's Property 12 i MAPS IN BACK POCKET MAP 1 Map Designated Units, Geology, Grab Samples. ii 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Pat's Property is located on the Ungava Peninsula in the Nunavik region of northern Quebec on claim map 351412, approximately 100 kilometres west-southwest of the coastal village of Kangiqsujuaq (Wakeham Bay).
    [Show full text]
  • “People of the Sea”: Archaeology and History of the Eeyou Marine Region
    Tracing the “People of the Sea”: Archaeology and History of the Eeyou Marine Region David Denton, Cree Nation Government Eeyou Marine Region Symposium Montreal, March 25-27, 2014 Revised April 25, 2014 1 Outline 1 Archaeology and the Cree Nation Government 2 Archaeological Potential of the EMR 3 Recent Research Near Waskaganish 4 Conclusions 2 Archaeology and the Cree Nation Government (CNG) The Cree Nation Government (formerly Cree Regional Authority) has carried out archaeological projects in many parts of Eeyou Istchee Within the CNG, the Cree Culture and Language Department is responsible for archaeology Over the decades, collaborative projects have taken place with all of the Cree communities Archaeology and the Cree Nation Government 3 Traditional Knowledge and Archaeology Most of the projects have used Cree traditional knowledge as a starting point for research Cree Elders and land-users have pointed out many sites for investigation Their knowledge has been critical in understanding how and why these sites were used and in exploring broader patterns of history and land use Archaeology and the Cree Nation Government 4 Archaeology and Cultural Heritage Program (ACHP) ACHP established under Nadoshtin and Boumhounan Agreements (Paix des braves) Focused on areas affected by hydroelectric development on the Eastmain and the Rupert Rivers Cree communities engaged in the process of exploring and preserving their heritage Archaeology as part of a broad cultural heritage program Archaeology and the Cree Nation Government 5 Archaeology and
    [Show full text]
  • Broadback Watershed Conservation Plan Located 800 Km North of Montreal, the Broadback River Remains a Pristine Example of a Southern Boreal Watershed
    Broadback Watershed Conservation Plan Located 800 km north of Montreal, the Broadback River remains a pristine example of a southern boreal watershed. Flowing from its source at Lac Frotet, the Broadback surges 450 km west to empty into Rupert Bay at the south end of James Bay. Along its path and within its larger 20,800 km2 watershed, the river supports the traditional hunting territories of Mistissini, Oujé-Bou- goumou, Waswanipi, Nemaska and Waskaganish. Once destined to be- come part of Hydro-Québec’s mega Nottaway-Broadback-Rupert project, the river received a reprieve in 2002 when the Crees signed the Paix des Braves Agree- ment with Québec. Although this agreement has saved the Broadback River from hydro development, it has not en- sured the river, and its watershed, protection from other forms of natural resource development. Forestry roads and harvesting have permanently transformed large portions of the watershed, particularly in the south, and recently numerous mining claims have been filed within the more remote intact portions of the watershed. Nevertheless, the Broadback remains an important source of intact wilderness in the region, as evident by the diminishing number of endangered woodland caribou that reside there. A recent study on woodland caribou commissioned by Quebec’s Ministry of Natural Resources and the Cree Regional Authority, http://chaireafd.uqat.ca/communique/nouvellesE.asp?Date=2012-10-22%2009:42:10 found that the two herds found in this region, the Nottaway and Assinica, are no longer self-sustaining according to benchmarks set by the Federal Government under the terms of the Species at Risk Act.
    [Show full text]
  • 1D New Québec and Torngat Orogens, Southeast Churchill Province
    1D In the Lac Maugue area (project 8, Figure 1D-1), between New Québec and Torngat lakes Romanet and Dunphy, Manicouagan Minerals Inc. Orogens, Southeast Churchill obtained average grades of 132 g/t Ag and 0.46% Cu over 4.85 metres from channel samples. A one-metre section of the Province (Core Zone), channel sample yielded grades of 237 g/t Ag and 1.5% Cu. The company excavated a new trench located 97 metres to the and Ungava Orogen northwest of a former trench from the 1990s. Previous work on known copper-zinc and copper showings near Lac Maugue Serge Perreault, Abdelali Moukhsil (Lac-Maugue and Maugue-Sud) dates back to the 1990s. Introduction Torngat Orogen and Southeast Composed mainly of Paleoproterozoic rocks, the New Churchill Province (core zone) Québec (Labrador Trough), Torngat, and Ungava (Cape Smith Belt) orogens cover a signifi cant proportion of northern Québec GEOLOGICAL OVERVIEW (fi gures 1D-1 and 1D-2). The Southeastern Churchill Province The Paleoproterozoic Torngat Orogen is bounded to the includes the New Québec and Torngat orogens and their hin- east by Archean rocks of the Nain Province and to the west terland (core zone, composed largely of Archean rocks and by Archean and Paleoproterozoic rocks of the core zone sometimes referred to as the Rae Province [James et al., 1996; (Figure 1D-1). This orogen is divided into lithotectonic domains Wardle et al., 2002] [Figure 1D-1]). and complexes separated by ductile shear zones (e.g., the Abloviak deformation zone, Figure 1D-1). The main targeted commodities in the New Québec Orogen and the core zone in 2004 were copper, nickel, platinum group Located in the Southeastern Churchill Province, the Trough elements (PGE), zinc, and cobalt.
    [Show full text]
  • COMEX Environmental Assessment of Proposed Logging Roads in Eeyou
    Brief submitted to the members of COMEX In the context of the Environmental Assessment of Proposed Logging Roads in Eeyou Istchee, Including Proposed Extension of Road N-822 (Road H) By SNAP Québec February 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 3 CHAPTER 1 Gaps in the proponent impact study........................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 2 Project impacts on woodland caribou, boreal population .......................................................... 8 2.1 Federal Science Report ................................................................................................ 8 2.2 Québec forest-dwelling woodland caribou recovery plan............................................. 8 2.3 Regional Context......................................................................................................... 8 2.4 Impact of road construction on caribou habitat in the Area of Interest ....................... 9 2.4a Nature Québec caribou study / protected area proposal........................................ 10 2.4b MRNF caribou blocks ........................................................................................... 11 2.4c Fortin et al. (2008) winter habitat........................................................................... 12 2.4d St-Pierre et al. (2006) report on forest-dwelling caribou......................................... 13 2.4e Joint Grand Council of
    [Show full text]
  • The James Bay Hydroelectric Project - Issue of the Century
    Guest Editorial: The James Bay Hydroelectric Project - Issue of the Century When Robert Bourassa unveiled the first phase of the James Bay hydroelectric project in the early 1970s, he called it “the project of the century.” This seemed an appropriate term for a scheme that would alter 19 waterways, create 27 reservoirsand cost tens of billions ofdollars. Apart from the Cree inhabitants and a handful of environmental activists, the project had few opponents. As described in a Hydro-Quebec brochure, “the territory, now being molded to man’s needs” seemed too remote and too vast to warrant much concern. Twenty years later, circumstances have changed dramatically. The “project of the century” is becoming the issue of the century as a broad base of opposition forms against it. Biologists, economists, energy experts, anthropologists, plus a growing number of well-informed individuals and groups in Canada and the United States have joined with the Cree and certain Inuit to oppose further hydroelectric development in the region. No longer remote, the James Bay territory, its environment and its people have become subjects of national and international importance. The reason for this shift is not that the second phase of the James Bay project is to be any larger or have a greater environmental impact than thefirst. In fact, theproject already completed in the basin of La Grande River islarger than thatwhich Hydro-Quebec is now preparing to develop on the Great Whale River. The Great Whale project will generate 3168 megawatts of electricity, compared with almost 15 000 for La Grande, and will flood 4400 km2 of land, compared with 9675.
    [Show full text]