JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE RESEARCH Journal homepage: www.jakraya.com/journal/jwr

ORIGINAL ARTICLE Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment,

Harish Prajapati and Arun Kumar Roy Mahato

Rai University, Dholka, , India. Gujarat Institute of Desert Ecology, Bhuj-Kachchh, Gujarat, India.

Abstract Wetlands are vital habitat for diverse kind of life forms, specifically

for birds. Among the various habitat of birds, wetlands are the most

preferred habitat for diverse species of birds. Thol Lake is one among the important destination of wetland birds of Gujarat which support large number and population of aquatic bird species. The present study was *Corresponding Author: conducted to assess the status and habitat preference of aquatic birds found in the lake environment. The study was carried out using flock count and Harish Prajapati point centred method on monthly basis on each type of microhabitats of the lake. A total of 60 species of aquatic birds recorded during the study Email: [email protected] periods which are belonging 17 families and 9 orders. Among the recorded

species, majority of them were resident birds (26 species) with 13 species

Received: 17/06/2018 were migratory. Out of the total bird species found within the lake Accepted: 24/08/2018 environment, four species were Vulnerable, six (6) species were Near Threatened while rest of bird species were categorised as Least Concern as per the IUCN. The assessing the abundance of birds species, it was found that more than 70 percent of species were common and fairly common to the lake environment. Among the various micro-habitat, open water, muddy shoreline and tree’s were the most preferred habitat or substratum for the bird species in the lake.

Keywords: Aquatic bird, Status, Habitat preference, Diversity, Thol Lake, Gujarat. 1. Introduction Birds are one of the best ecological indicators Wetlands are vital ecosystem provide wide and for the environmental health of an area. Monitoring varieties of ecosystem services to the countless of wetland birds provides valuable information on the biodiversity and mankind, ranging from freshwater ecological health and status of wetlands and can be a supply, food and biodiversity, to flood control, vital tool for developing awareness regarding the groundwater recharge and climate change mitigation, conservation value of the wetlands. The habitat type etc. (Weller, 1999). Wetlands are also important and structural complexity are known to influence avian conservation sites due to the extensive food chain and diversity and composition (MacArthur and MacArthur, rich biodiversity they support (Getzner, 2002). 1961). Wetlands are the most preferred habitat for diversity of It is important to highlight that the loss of birds for feeding, breeding, nesting or roosting which natural habitat and its fragmentation is a major cause of are broadly known as water birds (Kumar and Gupta, species loss and changes in community structure. 2013). This comprises bird groups are also commonly According to Rathore and Sharma (2000), birds present called waterfowl and waders. Birds are one of the in or near lake are affected by several factors such as integral components of wetland plays vital role in pollution, disturbance by human activities and lack of maintaining ecological services and maintaining maintenance of water bodies. Diamond (1976) ecological functions. They are also crucial component highlighted the urgent need of ecological studies to of wetlands as well as for recreation and ecotourism develop conservation programme for a habitat which (Desgranges et al ., 2006). Like other regions of world, are degrading in faster rate. Wetland birds are an wetlands are crucial ecosystem of arid and semi-arid important component of wildlife which acts as best landscape due to the richness of avi-faunal species. indicators for health of an ecosystem.

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

The Thol Bird Sanctuary is an important water surveys were conducted using flock count method body of the semi-arid landscape of Gujarat state which (Bibby et al. , 1992) in monthly basis. supports diverse flora and dependent fauna. The Abundance of each species of aquatic bird was Sanctuary is also an ecologically rich site for resident determined based using Kumar and Gupta (2009). The and migratory birds visiting across the globe which abundance of birds was measured as Common (C), attracts large number tourist from various parts of the recorded 17 - 20 times out of 20 visits. Fairly Common country (Modi et al., 2013). The avi-faunal diversity of (FC), recorded 12 - 16 times out of 20 visits, the Sanctuary was explored by notable authors viz. Uncommon (U), recorded 6 - 11 times out of 20 visits GEER (2002); Patel and Dharaiya (2008); Jathar and and Rare (R) recorded 0 - 4 times out of 20 visits. The Hathi (2010); Karia (2012). The ecology and habitat habitat preference of aquatic birds were assessed based utilization pattern of piscivorous birds were studies by on the presence of individuals of birds in different Pathak (2011); Shah (2016). Apart from these studies, micro-habitat/substratum within the lake environment the detailed studies on the status and habitat preference such as open water, muddy shoreline, shallow marshy of aquatic birds in the lake environment are lacking. area, on trees and bushes, reeds and grasslands near Thus, the present study was carried out to assess the water and electric wire over the lake, etc. status of water birds in this lake environment. 3. Result and Discussion 2. Materials and Method A total of 60 species of birds which are belonging to fifteen (15) families and nine (9) orders 2.1 Study Area were recorded from the lake environment (Table 1). The Thol Lake is geographically spread in 6.99 Among the nine orders, Pelicaniformes is the largest km 2 area in the district of Gujarat (Fig 1). The order based on the number of species recorded from the extent of wetland within Gujarat state is about 34,350 lake, followed by Anseriformes, Chardriformes and sq.km (17.6% of the state’s geographical area and two orders namely; Podicipediformes and Suliformes 22.9% of the national wetlands area). The Lake was having only one species recorded from each order. manmade, constructed in the year 1918 and now it is Similarly, Anatidae is the largest family of birds found designated as Thol Lake Bird Sanctuary in the year in the lake, followed by Ardeidae and four families 1988. The lake is fed by the runoff water from nearby with only one species each. Among the six different agricultural landscape through seasonal water channels types of feeding guilds of aquatic bird species recorded (Prajapati and Mahato, 2018). The sanctuary is an from the lake, carnivorous and omnivorous birds were important destination of large number of tourist from recorded highest with 19 species each of the guilds (Fig the state as well as of the country. 2). The earlier workers like Patel and Dharayia 2.2 Methodology (2008) reported 77 species of aquatic birds from the The study was conducted through the regular Thol Sanctuary; Jathar and Hatti (2010) reported 90 surveys in and around the lake environment during species of aquatic species from the Thol Bird January 2016 to April 2017. The surveys were Sanctuary; Pathak (2011) reported 23 species of systematically made in a fixed route and some time piscivorous birds from the lake while Karia (2012) randomly within the lake environment due to reported 76 species of aquatic bird from this sanctuary. fluctuation of water level between different seasons. Among the bird species of the lake, majority of the Most of the surveys were made early morning and species were resident, followed by resident migratory evening hours of the day using 8×40 binoculars and and only 19 species were migratory to the lake (Fig 3). recorded in systematically designed data sheet. The On analysis of the abundance of the recorded aquatic data recorded on the status of birds include species, bird species, 80 percent were common and fairly number of individuals, location, micro-habitat type, common while only four species were rare (Fig 4). It substratum, number of flocks, flock size, activity, etc. was also found that majority of the species of the lake Standard avi-faunal guides such as Grimmet et al . are categorised under Least Concern species (50 (1999); Ali (2002) were referred for identification of species) while 6 species are categorised as Near species, nomenclature and taxonomic position. Feeding Threatened and rest of four species are Vulnerable guilds were classified on the basis of direct category as per the IUCN (Table 1). observations and available literature (Ali and Ripley, The analysis on the habitat preference of the 1987). The conservation status of the bird species was aquatic birds in different micro-habitat/substratum assessed according to the Wildlife Protection Act, within the lake environment for various basic activities 1972, CITES (2002); IUCN (2010). The population like feeding, grooming, nesting, breeding, etc., it was found that out of total aquatic bird species, open water-

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 27 Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

Fig 1: Thol lake and its location in Mehsana district of Gujarat state.

Fig 2: Feeding guilds of avi -fauna in Thol lake environment.

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 28 Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

Fig 5: Habitat/substratum preference of avi-fauna recorded in Thol lake environment.

Table 1: Checklist of aquatic bird species recorded from Thol Bird Sanctuary

Sl. Order/Family/ Scientific Migratory Feeding Abunda IUCN, IWPA, No. Common name Name status guild nce 2018 1972 Coraciiformes Alcedinidae 1 Common Kingfisher Alcedo RM P FC LC Sch-IV atthis 2 Pied King fisher Ceryle rudis R P R LC Sch-IV 3 White-breasted Halcyon R P FC LC Sch-IV Kingfisher smyrnensis Anseriformes Anatidae 4 Knob-billed Duck Sarkidiornis R O C LC Sch-IV melanotos 5 Greater Scaup Aythya M P UC LC Sch-IV marila 6 Common Pochard Aythya M O FC VU Sch-IV ferina 7 Tufted Duck Aythya R O UC LC Sch-IV fuligula 8 Northern Pintail Anas acuta M O FC LC Sch-IV 9 Common Teal Anas crecca M G C LC Sch-IV 10 Anas M O UC LC Sch-IV platyrhynch os 11 Indian Spot-billed Anas RM H C LC Sch-IV Duck poecilorhyn cha 12 Graylag Goose Anser anser M H C LC Sch-IV 13 Bar-headed Goose Anser M H FC LC Sch-IV indicus 14 Eurasian Wigeon Mareca M H UC LC Sch-IV

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 29 Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

penelope 15 Lesser Whistling- Dendrocygn R O FC LC Sch-IV duck a javanica 16 Northern shoveler Spatula M I FC LC Sch-IV clypeata 17 Ruddy Shelduck Tadorna RM O UC LC Sch-IV ferruginea Suliformes Anhingidae 18 Oiented Darter Anhinga RM P C NT Sch-IV melanogaste r Pelecaniformes Ardeidae 19 Cattle Egret Bubulcus RM C FC LC Sch-IV ibis 20 Great White Egret Ardea alba R P FC LC Sch-IV 21 Grey Heron Ardea RM C FC LC Sch-IV cinerea 22 Intermediate Egret Ardea RM C C LC Sch-IV intermedia 23 Purple Heron Ardea RM C FC LC Sch-IV purpurea 24 Indian Pond Heron Ardeola R C FC LC Sch-IV grayii 25 Little Egret Egretta R C C LC Sch-IV garzetta 26 Black-crowned Nycticorax R C UC LC Sch-IV Night-heron nycticorax 27 Yellow Bittern Ixobrychus RM C R LC Sch-IV sinensis Pelecanidae 28 Pelecanus RM C FC VU Sch-IV crispus 29 Great White Pelican Pelecanus RM C C LC Sch-IV onocrotalus Phalacrocoracidae 30 Indian Cormorant Phalacrocor RM P FC LC Sch-IV ax fuscicollis 31 Little Cormorant Microcarbo RM P C LC Sch-IV niger Threskiornithidae 32 Black-headed Ibis Threskiornis R C C NT Sch-IV melanoceph alus 33 Eurasian Spoonbill Platalea RM C C LC Sch-IV leucorodia 34 Glossy Ibis Plegadis RM C FC LC Sch-IV falcinellus 35 Red-naped Ibis Pseudibis R O UC LC Sch-IV papillosa Charadriiformes Charadriidae 36 Red-wattled Vanellus R I FC LC Sch-IV

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 30 Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

Lapwing indicus 37 Yellow-wattled Vanellus R I FC LC Sch-IV Lapwing malabaricus Jacanidae 38 Pheasent-tailed Hydrophasi R I R LC Sch-IV Jacana anus chirurgus Laridae 39 River Tern Sterna R P FC LC Sch-IV aurantia 40 Commom Tern Sterna R P FC LC Sch-IV hirundo 41 Little Tern Sternula R P FC LC Sch-IV albifrons 42 Whiskered Tern Chlidonias RM P FC LC Sch-IV hybrida Recurvirostridae 43 Black-winged Stilt Himantopus R C C LC Sch-IV himantopus Scolopacidae 44 Bar-tailed Godwit Limosa M O UC NT Sch-IV lapponica 45 Black-tailed Godwit Limosa M C UC NT Sch-IV limosa 46 Green Sandpiper Tringa M C FC LC Sch-IV ochropus 47 Ruff Calidris R O FC LC Sch-IV pugnax Podicipediformes Podicipedidae 48 Little Grebe Tachybaptus R O UC LC Sch-IV ruficollis Ciconiiformes Ciconiidae 49 Asian openbill Anastomus R C C LC Sch-IV oscitans 50 Painted Stork Mycteria RM C C NT Sch-IV leucocephal a 51 Wooly-nacked Stork Ciconia R C R VU Sch-IV episcopus Gruiformes Gruidae 52 Common crane Grus grus M O C LC Sch-IV 53 Sarus Crane Antigone R O UC VU Sch-IV antigone Rallidae 54 Common coot Fulica atra RM O C LC Sch-IV 55 Common Moorhan Gallinula RM O FC LC Sch-IV chloropus 56 Purple Swamphen Porphyrio R O UC LC Sch-IV porphyrio 57 Watercock Gallicrex R O FC LC Sch-IV cinerea

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 31 Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

58 White-breasted Amaurornis R O FC LC Sch-IV Waterhen phoenicurus Phoenicopteriformes Phoenicopteridae 59 Phoenicopte RM O C LC Sch-IV rus roseus 60 Lesser Flamingo Phoeniconai RM H FC NT Sch-IV as minor R: Resident, RM: Resident Migratory, M: Migratory, C: Carnivore, H: Herbivore, I: Insectivore, O: Omnivore, P: Piscivore, C: Common, FC: Fairly Common, UC: Uncommon, R: Rare, VU: Vulnerable, NT: Near Threatened, LC: Least Concern, Sch: Schedule.

Table 2: Habitat preference of aquatic avi-fauna recorded from the Thol lake environment

Substratum No. of species Population % Population Frequency % Frequency Muddy Shoreline 23 1528 16.10 192 24.97 Canal 3 29 0.31 7 0.91 Cultivation 4 198 2.09 16 2.08 Reed and Grass bed 3 86 0.91 13 1.69 Shallow and Marsh 6 571 6.02 19 2.47 Open Water 37 4728 49.83 363 47.20 Pole 1 2 0.02 2 0.26 Scrubland 4 468 4.93 28 3.64 Tree’s and bushes 17 1878 19.79 129 16.78 Total 60 9488 769 is most preferred habitat (61.67%), followed by muddy Shah (2016) reported that shallow water micro- shoreline (38.33%), trees and bushes (28.33%) and habitat is the most preferred while trees and bushes are electric wire (1.67%) are the least preferred substratum the second most preferred microhabitat for the 12 for the aquatic birds within the lake environment (Fig 5 selected bird species of this sanctuary, while the and Table 2). present study showed that open water is the most preferred micro-habitat for the aquatic birds of this lake. This is might be due to the different survey period, variation in number of tourist visiting the lake in different diurnal hours and selection of bird species.

4. Conclusion Wetland birds play a significant cultural and social role in local communities as well as being an important component of wetland ecosystem (Kumar et Fig 3: Migratory status of avi-fauna recorded in Thol al., 2006). In recent time, majority of the natural or lake environment. manmade wetland are under threat due to natural as

well as anthropogenic activities. The Thol bird Sanctuary is an important destination for resident and migratory birds from last few decades. The variation in diversity of aquatic bird species and habitat preference of bird species in the lake environment highlighted that the lake required intensive conservation and management planning to enrich the diversity and population of aquatic bird species of this lake.

Fig 4: Abundance of avi-fauna recorded in Thol lake environment.

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 32 Prajapati and Mahato...Status and Habitat Preference of Aquatic Birds in the Thol Lake Environment, Gujarat

References Arya M, Rao RJ and Mishra AK (2014). Avifaunal Kumar P and Gupta SK (2013). Status of wetland birds of occurrence and distribution of wetland birds in Sakhya Chhilchhila Wildlife Sanctuary, Haryana, India. Sagar and Madhav Lakes in Madhav National Park, Journal of Threatened Taxa , 5(5): 3969-3976. Shivpuri, India. Journal of Environmental Biology , 35: Kumar P and Gupta SK (2009). Diversity and abundance of 703-708. wetland birds around Kurukshetra. Our Nature , 7: 212- Pathak CP (2011). A study of ecology of the “Piscivorous 217. Birds at Thol Bird Sanctuary” Ph.D Thesis submitted to MacArthur RH and MacArthur JW (1961). On bird species the Saurashtra University, Rajkot. diversity. Ecology , 42: 594-598. Desgranges J, Ingram J and Drolet B (2006). Modelling Modi NR, Mulia NR and Dudani SN (2013). Ecological wetland bird response to water level changes in the investigations of Shahwadi Wetland. International Lake Ontarioe St. Lawrence River hydrosystem. Journal of Pharmacy and Life Sciences, 4(12): 3193- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment , 113: 3199. 329e365. Nirmal Kumar JI, Verma Y and Kumar RN (2011). Spatial GEER (2002). Ecological study of Thol Lake Wildlife (Bird) analysis of composition and species interactions with Sanctuary, GEER Foundation, Indroda Park, temporal variation of Zooplankton Community of Gandhinagar. Shallow Tropical Lake: Thol Bird Sanctuary, India. Grimmett R, Inskipp C and Inskipp T (1999). Pocket guide to Universal Journal of Environmental Research and the birds of the Indian subcontinent. New Delhi: Technology , 1(2): 151-159. Oxford University Press. Patel S and Dharaiya N (2008). Marsh Bird Community Iyer MK (2005). Terrestrial birds of Thol Bird Sanctuary and Index of biotic integrity: a key to study an ecological its surroundings. Flamingo , 3(1): 3-6. condition of wetland. 558-561. In (Ed. Sengupta N and Jathar G and Hathi D (2010). Thol - a bird paradise of Dalwani R) Proceedings of Taal 2007: The 12 th World Gujarat. BUCEROS, 14(3): 7-10. Lake Conference. Karia JP (2012). Floral and Avifaunal Diversity of Thol Lake Shah CV (2016). Habitat Utilization by the Piscivorous Birds Wildlife (Bird) Sanctuary of Gujarat State, India. pp. 3- in Thol Bird Sanctuary. Research Hub - International 34. In Biodiversity Enrichment in a Diverse World , Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 3(9): 1-7. Edited by Gbolagade Akeem Lameed . pp. 508. Shivkar A and Vaze S (2014). Snapshot sightings: Greater Kattan GH and Franco P (2004). Bird diversity along Scaup from Thol Bird Sanctuary, Gujarat. Indian Birds , elevational gradients in the Andes of Colombia: area 9(4): 112A. and mass effects. Global Ecology and Biogeography , Weller MW (1999). Wetland birds habitat resources and 13: 451-458. conservation implications. Press Syndicate of the Khan MS and Pant A (2017). Conservation status, species University of Cambridge, United Kingdom . pp. 137. composition, and distribution of Avian Community in Kumar A, Tak PC and Sati JP (2006). Residential, population Bhimbandh Wildlife Sanctuary, India. Journal of Asia- and conservation status of Indian wetland birds. Water Pacific Biodiversity , 10: 20-26. birds around the world. Eds. GC Boere, CA Galbraith and DA Stroud . The Stationery Office, Edinburgh, UK . pp. 308.

Journal of Wildlife Research | July-September, 2018 | Volume 06 | Issue 03 | Pages 26-33 © 2018 Jakraya 33