DOCSLIB.ORG

Rukwa Regional Administrative Secretariat and the World Bank Tanzania Country Office

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rukwa Regional Administrative Secretariat and the World Bank Tanzania Country Office 42367 UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA Public Disclosure Authorized Rukwa Regional Administrative Secretariat and the World Bank Tanzania Country Office GROWTH PROSPECTS FOR RUKWA Public Disclosure Authorized REGION Constraints and Opportunities Public Disclosure Authorized June, 2007 Public Disclosure Authorized Table of Contents 1. FOREWORD ......................................................................................................................................... 1 2. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 2 2.1. BACKGROUND AND LOCATION ............................................................................................... 3 2.2. CLIMATE.......................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3. PEOPLE AND CULTURE............................................................................................................... 4 2.4. ECONOMY AND POPULATION .................................................................................................. 4 2.5. AGE DEPENDENCY RATIO ......................................................................................................... 4 2.6. ECOLOGICAL ZONES................................................................................................................... 5 3. PRODUCTIVE SECTORS ................................................................................................................... 5 3.1. CROPS............................................................................................................................................... 5 3.1.1. OUTPUTS PER HECTOR............................................................................................................... 6 3.1.2. MARKETS FOR CROPS................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2.1. FOOD CROPS.............................................................................................................................. 6 3.1.2.2. CASH CROPS .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.1.2.3. COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES.................................................................................................... 7 3.1.3. FARM INPUTS................................................................................................................................. 7 3.1.4. IRRIGATION SCHEMES ............................................................................................................... 8 3.1.5. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION............................................................................................. 8 3.1.6. CHALLENGES FOR INCREASED CROP PRODUCTION IN RUKWA REGION................ 8 3.1.7. WAY FORWARD............................................................................................................................. 9 3.1.8. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 10 3.2. LIVESTOCK................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2.1. MARKETS FOR LIVESTOCK PRODUCTS.............................................................................. 12 3.2.2. SUPPORT SERVICES ................................................................................................................... 12 3.2.3. LAND ISSUES................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2.4. WAY FORWARD........................................................................................................................... 13 3.2.5. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 13 3.3. FISHERIES ..................................................................................................................................... 13 3.3.1. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 14 3.4. FORESTRY..................................................................................................................................... 14 3.4.1. BEEKEEPING ................................................................................................................................ 15 3.4.2. WILDLIFE ...................................................................................................................................... 15 3.4.3. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 16 3.5. TOURISM........................................................................................................................................ 16 i 3.5.1. KATAVI NATIONAL PARK........................................................................................................ 16 3.5.2. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 17 3.6. MINING........................................................................................................................................... 18 3.6.1. MINERAL PROSPECTING AND MINING ............................................................................... 19 3.6.2. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 20 4. SOCIAL SECTORS............................................................................................................................. 20 4.1. EDUCATION .................................................................................................................................. 20 4.1.1. PRE PRIMARY EDUCATION ..................................................................................................... 20 4.1.2. PRIMARY EDUCATION .............................................................................................................. 20 4.1.3. POST PRIMARY VOCATIONAL TECHNICAL TRAINING ................................................. 21 4.1.4. SECONDARY EDUCATION ........................................................................................................ 21 4.1.5. HOSTELS FOR BOYS AND GIRLS............................................................................................ 22 4.1.6. LEVEL OF LITERACY: ............................................................................................................... 22 4.1.7. COLLEGES/UNIVERSITIES ....................................................................................................... 22 4.1.8. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 23 4.2. HEALTH ......................................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.1. COMMON DISEASES................................................................................................................... 23 4.2.2. HEALTH STAFF............................................................................................................................ 24 4.2.3. HIV/AIDS ........................................................................................................................................ 25 4.2.4. IDENTIFIED OPPORTUNITIES FOR INVESTMENTS.......................................................... 26 5. INFRASTRUCTURE .......................................................................................................................... 26 5.1. TRANSPORT.................................................................................................................................. 26 5.1.1. ROAD TRANSPORT ..................................................................................................................... 26 5.1.2. RAILWAY TRANSPORT ............................................................................................................. 29 5.1.3. LAKE TRANSPORT...................................................................................................................... 30 5.1.4. AIR TRANSPORT.......................................................................................................................... 30 5.2. TELEPHONE COMMUNICATION ............................................................................................ 31 5.3. RADIO AND TELEVISION STATIONS..................................................................................... 32 5.4. ENERGY ......................................................................................................................................... 32 5.5. WATER ........................................................................................................................................... 34 6. DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS AND NATIONAL STAKEHOLDERS ACTIVITIES................ 35 7. RESOURCES MOBILISATION........................................................................................................ 35 7.1. COUNCILS’ AND CENTRAL GOVERNMENT SOURCES .................................................... 35 7.2. OTHER SOURCES ........................................................................................................................ 36 8. PLANNING PROCESS......................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland
    The United Republic of Tanzania June, 2018 The United Republic of Tanzania National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 Tanzania Mainland The National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017) was compiled by the National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) in collaboration with National Technical Working Group on Environment Statistics. The compilation work of this report took place between December, 2016 to March, 2018. Funding for compilation and report writing was provided by the Government of Tanzania and the World Bank (WB) through the Tanzania Statistical Master Plan (TSMP) Basket Fund. Technical support was provided by the United Nations Statistics Division (UNSD) and the East African Community (EAC) Secretariat. Additional information about this report may be obtained from the National Bureau of Statistics through the following address: Director General, 18 Kivukoni Road, P.O.Box 796, 11992 Dar es Salaam, Tanzania (Telephone: 255-22-212-2724; email: [email protected]; website: www.nbs.go.tz). Recommended citation: National Bureau of Statistics (NBS) [Tanzania] 2017. National Environment Statistics Report, 2017 (NESR, 2017), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania Mainland. TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... ix List of Maps ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project
    THE UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRIME MINISTER’S OFFICE Public Disclosure Authorized Southern Agricultural Growth Corridor of Tanzania (SAGCOT) Public Disclosure Authorized Investment Project SRATEGIC REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL Public Disclosure Authorized AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (SRESA) This SRESA report was prepared for the Government of Tanzania by Environmental Resources Management Limited (ERM) under a contract as part of SAGCOT preparatory activities Public Disclosure Authorized DECEMBER 2013 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 BACKGROUND 1 1.2 PROGRAMMEOVERVIEW 1 1.3 STUDY OBJECTIVE 2 1.4 PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT 3 1.5 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 3 1.5.1 Overview 3 1.5.2 Screening 4 1.5.3 Scoping 4 1.5.4 Baseline Description 4 1.5.5 Scenario Development 4 1.5.6 Impact Assessment 5 1.5.7 Development of Mitigation Measures 5 1.5.8 Consultation 6 1.5.9 Constraints and Limitations 6 1.6 REPORT LAYOUT 6 2 THE SOUTHERN AGRICULTURAL GROWTH CORRIDOR OF TANZANIA 8 2.1 THE SAGCOT PROGRAMME 8 2.1.1 The SAGCOT Concept 8 2.1.2 SAGCOT Organisation 11 2.2 PROPOSED WORLD BANK SUPPORTED SAGCOT INVESTMENT PROJECT 14 2.2.1 General 14 2.2.2 Catalytic Fund 15 2.2.3 Support Institutions 16 3 THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR IN TANZANIA 20 3.1 INTRODUCTION 20 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND THE TANZANIAN ECONOMY 20 3.2.1 Overview 20 3.2.2 Land Use 25 3.3 PRIORITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGRICULTURE SECTOR 25 3.3.1 Current Initiatives for Agricultural Development 25 3.3.2 Rationale for SAGCOT Programme 29 3.3.3 District Level Agricultural Planning 30 3.4 FINANCING POLICIES
    [Show full text]
  • Resettlement Policy Framework (Rpf) for Proposed 340Km Mbeya –Tunduma–Sumbawanga 400Kv Transmission
    RESETTLEMENT POLICY FRAMEWORK (RPF) FOR PROPOSED 340KM MBEYA –TUNDUMA–SUMBAWANGA 400KV TRANSMISSION Public Disclosure Authorized LINE AND ~4KM TUNDUMA SUBSTATION TO TANZANIA-ZAMBIA BORDER 330KV TRANSMISSION LINE AND ASSOCIATED SUBSTATION AT TUNDUMA AND SUMBAWANGA Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized VOLUME I: MAIN RPF REPORT PROJECT PROPONENT: Tanzania Electric Supply Company Limited (TANESCO), Umeme Park, Ubungo Area, P.O. Box 9024, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, Tel: +255 22 2451133, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] Public Disclosure Authorized PREPARED BY: Ms. Elizabeth J. Aisu Individual Consultant, P.O. Box 20177 Kampala-Uganda Tel: +256 772 616 489, Fax: +255 22 2451149, E-mail: [email protected] 14th April, 2018 LIST OF EXPERTS The following experts were involved during preparation of this Resettlement Policy Framework (RPF) for Mbeya-Tunduma-Sumbawanga 400kV Power TL and ~4km of segment of 330kV TL from Tunduma Substation to TanZam border as part of study team: S/N NAME EXPERTISE 1. Ms. Elizabeth Aisu RAP and RPF specialist –Team Leader 2. Ms. Vaileth Kimaro Sociologist 3. Mr. Fikirini M. Mtandika Environmentalist 4. Mr. Izaria Luvanda Land Surveyor 5. District Valuers, District Land Officers and All District where proposed TL traversed District Community Development Officers i TABLE OF CONTENTS List of experts ............................................................................................................................. i Table of contents .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kigoma Airport
    The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment July 2008 In Association With : Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Ltd Belva Consult Limited Corinthian House, PO Box 7521, Mikocheni Area, 17 Lansdowne Road, Croydon, Rose Garden Road, Plot No 455, United Kingdom CR0 2BX, UK Dar es Salaam Tel: +44(02) 08604 8999 Tel: +255 22 2120447 Fax: +44 (02)0 8604 8877 Email: [email protected] Fax: +255 22 2120448 Web Site: www.fsnow.co.uk Email: [email protected] The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by Sir Frederick Snow and Partners Limited in association with Belva Consult Limited Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0 July 08 Belva KC Preliminary Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Airports Authority is undertaking a feasibility study and detailed engineering design for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Kigoma airport, located in Kigoma-Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma region. The project is part of a larger project being undertaken by the Tanzania Airport Authority involving rehabilitation and upgrading of high priority commercial airports across the country. The Tanzania Airport Authority has commissioned two companies M/S Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Limited of UK in association with Belva Consult Limited of Tanzania to undertake a Feasibility Study, Detail Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments of seven airports namely Arusha, Bukoba, Kigoma, Tabora, Mafia Island, Shinyanga and Sumbawanga.
    [Show full text]
  • Biofuels, Land Access and Rural Livelihoods in Tanzania
    Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania Emmanuel Sulle and Fred Nelson Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania Emmanuel Sulle and Fred Nelson Series editor: Lorenzo Cotula Biofuels, land access and rural livelihoods in Tanzania Emmanuel Sulle and Fred Nelson © IIED, 2009 For copies of this publication, contact IIED. Email: [email protected] IIED Order No: 12560IIED Citation: Sulle, E. and Nelson, F., 2009, BIOFUELS, LAND ACCESS AND RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN TANZANIA, IIED, London. ISBN: 978-1-84369-749-7 All photos by Emmanuel Sulle, 2008 and 2009. Cover photo: Boiling palm oil in the local processing mill in Kigoma Rural District, Tanzania. Design: Smith+Bell (www.smithplusbell.com) Printing: Russell Press (www.russellpress.com) Printed on: Greencoat Velvet 200 gsm and Greencoat Velvet 100 gsm The research findings presented in the report are updated to June 2009. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of IIED. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This research report was commissioned by Tanzania Natural Resource Forum’s Forestry Working Group (TFWG) and the International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED). Funding for the research and for this publication was provided by IIED’s Multidonor Framework Agreement, generously supported by Danida (Denmark), DFID (UK), DGIS (the Netherlands), Irish Aid (Ireland), Norad (Norway), SDC (Switzerland) and Sida (Sweden). Additional funding for the research was kindly provided by IUCN Tanzania as part of its support to the TFWG. We were warmly welcomed by the villagers we visited and many of them had insightful thoughts and observations to share. Thank you to community leaders who generously provided key information on biofuel developments in their villages.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Transport and Firm Productivity: Evidence from Tanzania
    WPS8173 Policy Research Working Paper 8173 Public Disclosure Authorized Rail Transport and Firm Productivity Evidence from Tanzania Public Disclosure Authorized Atsushi Iimi Richard Martin Humphreys Yonas Eliesikia Mchomvu Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized Transport and ICT Global Practice Group August 2017 Policy Research Working Paper 8173 Abstract Railway transport generally has the advantage for large-vol- Rail transport is a cost-effective option for firms. How- ume, long-haul freight operations. Africa possesses ever, the study finds that firms’ inventory is costly. This significant railway assets. However, many rail lines are cur- is a disadvantage of using rail transport. Rail operations rently not operational because of the lack of maintenance. are unreliable, adding more inventory costs to firms. The The paper recasts light on the impact of rail transportation implied elasticity of demand for transport services is esti- on firm productivity, using micro data collected in Tanza- mated at −1.01 to −0.52, relatively high in absolute terms. nia. To avoid the endogeneity problem, the instrumental This indicates the rail users’ sensitivity to prices as well as variable technique is used to estimate the impact of rail severity of modal competition against truck transportation. transport. The paper shows that the overall impact of rail The study also finds that firm location matters to the deci- use on firm costs is significant despite that the rail unit sion to use rail services. Proximity to rail infrastructure rates are set lower when the shipping distance is longer. is important for firms to take advantage of rail benefits. This paper is a product of the Transport and ICT Global Practice Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards a Regional Information Base for Lake Tanganyika Research
    RESEARCH FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE FISHERIES ON LAKE GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/Ol(En) TANGANYIKA GCP/RAF/271/FIN-TD/01 (En) January 1992 TOWARDS A REGIONAL INFORMATION BASE FOR LAKE TANGANYIKA RESEARCH by J. Eric Reynolds FINNISH INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Bujumbura, January 1992 The conclusions and recommendations given in this and other reports in the Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika Project series are those considered appropriate at the time of preparation. They may be modified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the Project. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of FAO or FINNIDA concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or concerning the determination of its frontiers or boundaries. PREFACE The Research for the Management of the Fisheries on Lake Tanganyika project (Tanganyika Research) became fully operational in January 1992. It is executed by the Food and Agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO) and funded by the Finnish International Development Agency (FINNIDA). This project aims at the determination of the biological basis for fish production on Lake Tanganyika, in order to permit the formulation of a coherent lake-wide fisheries management policy for the four riparian States (Burundi, Tanzania, Zaïre and Zambia). Particular attention will be also given to the reinforcement of the skills and physical facilities of the fisheries research units in all four beneficiary countries as well as to the buildup of effective coordination mechanisms to ensure full collaboration between the Governments concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania MFR Summary Report
    TANZANIA August 20, 2018 Market Fundamentals Summary KEY MESSAGES The objective of this report is to document the basic market context Figure 1. Map of Tanzania for staple food and livestock production and marketing in Tanzania. The information presented is based on desk research, a field assessment using rapid rural appraisal techniques, and a consultation workshop with stakehoders in Tanzania. Findings from this report will inform regular market monitoring and analysis in Tanzania. Maize, rice, sorghum, millet, pulses (beans and peas), cassava and bananas (plantains) are the main staple foods in Tanzania. Maize is the most widely consumed staple in Tanzania and the country imports significant quantities of wheat to meet local demand for wheat flour. Consumption of other staples varies across the country based on local supply and demand dynamics. Cattle, goat and sheep are the major sources of red meat consumed in Tanzania. Tanzania’s cropping calendar follows two distinct seasonal patterns. The Msimu season covers unimodal rainfall areas in the south, west and central parts of the country while the Masika and Vuli seasons Source: FEWS NET (2018). cover bi-modal rainfall areas in the north and eastern parts of the country (Figure 5). Figure 2. Tanzania’s average self sufficiency status for key staple foods (2014/15 – 2017/18) As a member of the East Africa Community (EAC) and the Southern African Development Community (SADC), Tanzania plays an important role in regional staple food trade across East and Southern Africa (Annex III). The country is generally a surplus producer of staple cereals and pulses, and exports significant quantities of these commodities to neighboring countries in East and Southern Africa inlcuding Kenya, Malawi, Zambia, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratice Republic of Congo (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • The Contribution of Forest Products to Rural Livelihoods in Nkasi District, Rukwa, Tanzania
    THE CONTRIBUTION OF FOREST PRODUCTS TO RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN NKASI DISTRICT, RUKWA, TANZANIA BY ANSBERT SEVERIN RWAMAHE A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES FOR SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE OF SOKOINE UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, MOROGORO, TANZANIA. 2008 i ABSTRACT This study was conducted in Nkasi District, Rukwa region, Tanzania, with the overall objective of assessing the contribution of forest resources in improving the livelihoods of rural communities. The focus was on various ways in which local communities in the study area earn income through forest resources. Similarly, the study focused on the types and quantities of the forest products and establishment of the contribution of the products to household income. Primary data were collected from household survey in the study area by using questionnaire, PRA techniques and check list for key informants. Data collected during PRA were analysed with the help of local community. Content and structural- functional analysis techniques were applied for qualitative data and information. The quantitative data were analyzed by using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) programme. The secondary data were obtained from the District Natural Resources Office. The results show that indigenous forests provide various types of forest products with substantial contribution to the livelihoods of the household. The forest products comprise about 21% of the total annual household cash income. Likewise, the study quantified the annually utilized forest products per household to be around TAS 186 815. The study also identified endangered plant species orchids which is widely traded and consumed by about 63% of the sampled households.
    [Show full text]
  • Invest in Tabora, Tanzania
    Investment Climate Markets for Goods and services The Tanzanian Market comprises 40 million consumers; Availability of Skilled and Semi-Skilled Labour the East African Community (EAC) increases that market to over 140 million. • The region boasts ten technical colleges and three universities, which together graduate 2,300 students a Overseas markets include the European Union, the United year in various fields such as accounting, agriculture, States, the Middle East and Emerging Asia, with special beekeeping, business administration, education, and access to the EU and US through the Everything But Arms information technology. (EBA) initiative and the African Growth and Opportunity • Due to the high unemployment rate, wages are very Act (AGOA). low compared to neighbouring cities in Tanzania. Over half the population is classified as young. Generous Incentives Enhanced capital deductions and allowances for lead and Improving Infrastructure priority sectors. • Transport links are being strengthened with Dar es Additional incentives for joint ventures with Tanzanians Salaam, as well as with Kigoma and Mwanza on the western and northern borders. and wholly owned foreign projects above USD 300,000. • Electricity supply is more stable than in other regions Double taxation agreements ratified with nine countries such as Kigoma, Rukwa and Katavi. and bilateral investment treaties signed with fifteen. • Studies are in progress to ensure availability of sufficient Ownership of properties, dispensation of assets, and drinking water. repatriation of income guaranteed. • Key institutional reforms in telecommunications have increased the number of providers, making Tabora’s For a complete list of incentives as well as investment guarantees, wireless sector one of the most competitive in the see www.investintabora.com.
    [Show full text]
  • Tanzania-Rwanda-Burundi Phase II Dar Es Salaam-Isaka-Kigali/Keza-Musongati Railway Project Study 2
    AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND PROJECT : PHASE II DAR ES SALAAM-ISAKA-KIGALI/KEZA- MUSONGATI RAILWAY PROJECT STUDY COUNTRY: TANZANIA - RWANDA and BURUNDI Date: September 2009 Team Leader: A. MOHAMED, Transport Economist, OINF.2 Members E. MASENGO, Transport Engineer, OINF.2 N. SENOU, Transport Economist , OINF.2 Project Team Division Manager: J. RWAMABUGA, OINF.2 Sector Director : G. MBESHERUBUSA, OINF Regional Director D. GAYE, OREA/OREB A. OUMAROU, Transport Engineer, OINF.2 B. TRAORE, Transport Engineer, OINF.1 P. RUGUMIRE., Transport Engineer, OINF.1 N. KULEMEKA, Socio-economist, OINF.2 Peer Review M. FARAOUN, Financial Analyst, OPSM A. BABALOLA, Transport Engineer, OPSM H. IMAN, Financial Analyst, OPSM M. SALAWOU, Financial Analyst, ONRI M. AJIJO, Transport Economist, ONRI AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT FUND TRA-TUNIS B.P. 323 TUNIS-BELVEDERE 1002 Tel.: (216) 71 333 511 Fax: (216) 71 352 933 PROJECT INFORMATION SHEET Date: 31 July 2009 The information given hereunder is intended to provide guidance to prospective suppliers, contractors, consultants and all persons interested in the procurement of goods and services for projects approved by the Boards of Directors of the Bank Group. More detailed information can be obtained from the executing agencies of the Borrower and the Donees. 1. COUNTRY AND PROJECT TITLE : Multinational: Tanzania-Rwanda-Burundi Phase II Dar es Salaam-Isaka-Kigali/Keza-Musongati Railway Project Study 2. PROJECT LOCATION : Tanzania, Rwanda and Burundi 3. - BORROWER : United Republic of Tanzania - DONEES : Republic of Rwanda and Republic of Burundi 4. EXECUTING AGENCY : Ministry of Infrastructure of Rwanda Boulevard de l’Umuganda B.P. 24 Kigali, Rwanda 5. STUDY DESCRIPTION : The study comprises: (A) Study Services; (B) Technical Assistance Services; (C) Financial Audit Services; and (D) Study Coordination and Management.
    [Show full text]