DOCSLIB.ORG

The Evolution and Breakdown of Self-Incompatibility in Leavenworthia: Insights from the S-Locus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Evolution and Breakdown of Self-Incompatibility in Leavenworthia: Insights from the S-Locus The evolution and breakdown of self-incompatibility in Leavenworthia: insights from the S-locus Adam C. Herman Department of Biology McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada July 2015 A thesis submitted to McGill University in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy © Adam Herman, 2015 DEDICATION To Otis and Louis Herman What you’ll find in here is some of what I did when you guys were little. Crazy, huh? I love you both so much. Call your mother and me. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION ................................................................................................................................ 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 6 PREFACE ....................................................................................................................................... 8 Thesis format ............................................................................................................................................ 8 Contributions of authors ........................................................................................................................... 9 Statement of originality .......................................................................................................................... 11 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................................................ 13 ABSTRACT .................................................................................................................................. 15 RÉSUMÉ ...................................................................................................................................... 17 General Introduction and Literature Review ................................................................................ 20 References .............................................................................................................................................. 28 Chapter 1: Phylogeny of Leavenworthia S-alleles suggests unidirectional mating system evolution and enhanced positive selection following an ancient population bottleneck. ............. 36 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 37 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 38 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................................... 41 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 48 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................... 52 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................ 59 Tables ..................................................................................................................................................... 61 Figures .................................................................................................................................................... 63 References .............................................................................................................................................. 69 Linking Statement................................................................................................................................... 77 Chapter 2: Secondary evolution of a self-incompatibility locus in the Brassicaceae genus Leavenworthia............................................................................................................................... 79 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 80 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 81 Materials and Methods ........................................................................................................................... 84 Results .................................................................................................................................................... 92 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................. 104 Figures .................................................................................................................................................. 112 References ............................................................................................................................................ 124 Linking Statement................................................................................................................................. 131 Chapter 3: Strong, recent selection for self-compatibility in a population of Leavenworthia alabamica .................................................................................................................................... 133 Abstract ................................................................................................................................................. 134 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 135 3 Materials and Methods ......................................................................................................................... 138 Results .................................................................................................................................................. 143 Discussion ............................................................................................................................................. 146 Conclusions .......................................................................................................................................... 151 Tables ................................................................................................................................................... 152 Figures .................................................................................................................................................. 155 References ............................................................................................................................................ 162 General Conclusions and Summary ............................................................................................ 170 References ............................................................................................................................................ 174 Appendix I .................................................................................................................................. 176 Supplemental results for Chapter 1....................................................................................................... 176 References ............................................................................................................................................ 185 Appendix II ................................................................................................................................. 186 Supplemental tables and figures for Chapter 2 ..................................................................................... 186 Appendix III ................................................................................................................................ 206 Supplemental Methods for Chapter 3 ................................................................................................... 206 References ............................................................................................................................................ 217 4 LIST OF TABLES CHAPTER 1: Table 1. Diversity statistics for the SRK alleles studied ............................................................... 61 Table 2. Number, identity and average for sites identified as evolving under positive selection in the taxa studied, according to Model M8 implemented in CODEML ............................. 62 CHAPTER 3: Table 1. Summary statistics for loci included in this study .. ..................................................... 152 5 LIST OF FIGURES CHAPTER 1: Figure 1. Sliding window analysis of nucleotide diversity (π) in the portion of the S-domain of SRK encompassing hypervariable regions 2 and 3............................................................... 63 Figure 2a. Majority-rule (50%) consensus phylogeny for Leavenworthia SRK alleles ............... 64 Figure 2b. cpDNA phylogeny of the genus Leavenworthia
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chilling Consequences: Herbarium Records Reveal Earlier Reproductive Phenology of Winter Annual Gladecress in a Wetter, Cooler Climate
    Received: 14 August 2019 | Revised: 6 November 2019 | Accepted: 28 November 2019 DOI: 10.1002/ppp3.10095 RESEARCH ARTICLE Chilling consequences: Herbarium records reveal earlier reproductive phenology of winter annual gladecress in a wetter, cooler climate Caitlin Banaszak1 | Joshua B. Grinath1,2 | Christopher R. Herlihy1 1Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, USA Societal Impact Statement 2Department of Biological Sciences, Idaho Networks of digitized herbarium records are rich resources for understanding plant State University, Pocatello, ID, USA responses to climate change. While the climate is warming globally, some localities Correspondence are experiencing climate cooling, the effects of which are poorly understood. Our Joshua B. Grinath, Department of Biological herbarium-based study of a geographically restricted species shows that the timing Sciences, Idaho State University, 921 S 8th Ave, Mail Stop 8007, Pocatello, ID 83209, of reproduction can shift earlier as the climate becomes cooler and wetter. Local USA. variation in climate change may be a key factor driving the high variability of changes Email: [email protected] observed in plant reproduction and climate cooling should be considered along with Christopher R. Herlihy, Department of Biology, Middle Tennessee State University, other global change drivers. This will help enable accurate predictions for the suc- P.O. Box 60, Murfreesboro, TN 37132, USA. cessful management of climate change effects. Email: [email protected] Summary Funding information • Plant phenological responses to global warming are well studied. However, while NSF, Grant/Award Number: 1119176 many locations are experiencing increased temperatures, some locations are ex- periencing climate cooling. Little work has been conducted to understand plant phenological responses to cooling trends, much less the combined effects of cooling and other factors, such as changing precipitation.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxa Named in Honor of Ihsan A. Al-Shehbaz
    TAXA NAMED IN HONOR OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1. Tribe Shehbazieae D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 22. 2014. 2. Shehbazia D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 3. Shehbazia tibetica (Maxim.) D. A. German, Turczaninowia 17(4): 20. 2014. 4. Astragalus shehbazii Zarre & Podlech, Feddes Repert. 116: 70. 2005. 5. Bornmuellerantha alshehbaziana Dönmez & Mutlu, Novon 20: 265. 2010. 6. Centaurea shahbazii Ranjbar & Negaresh, Edinb. J. Bot. 71: 1. 2014. 7. Draba alshehbazii Klimeš & D. A. German, Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 158: 750. 2008. 8. Ferula shehbaziana S. A. Ahmad, Harvard Pap. Bot. 18: 99. 2013. 9. Matthiola shehbazii Ranjbar & Karami, Nordic J. Bot. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-1051.2013.00326.x, 10. Plocama alshehbazii F. O. Khass., D. Khamr., U. Khuzh. & Achilova, Stapfia 101: 25. 2014. 11. Alshehbazia Salariato & Zuloaga, Kew Bulletin …….. 2015 12. Alshehbzia hauthalii (Gilg & Muschl.) Salariato & Zuloaga 13. Ihsanalshehbazia Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65: 93. 2016. 14. Ihsanalshehbazia granatensis (Boiss. & Reuter) Tahir Ali & Thines, Taxon 65. 93. 2016. 15. Aubrieta alshehbazii Dönmez, Uǧurlu & M.A.Koch, Phytotaxa 299. 104. 2017. 16. Silene shehbazii S.A.Ahmad, Novon 25: 131. 2017. PUBLICATIONS OF IHSAN A. AL-SHEHBAZ 1973 1. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1973. The biosystematics of the genus Thelypodium (Cruciferae). Contrib. Gray Herb. 204: 3-148. 1977 2. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1977. Protogyny, Cruciferae. Syst. Bot. 2: 327-333. 3. A. R. Al-Mayah & I. A. Al-Shehbaz. 1977. Chromosome numbers for some Leguminosae from Iraq. Bot. Notiser 130: 437-440. 1978 4. Al-Shehbaz, I. A. 1978. Chromosome number reports, certain Cruciferae from Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Polymorphism, Haplotype Structure and Balancing Selection in the Leavenworthia Pgic Locus
    Copyright 1999 by the Genetics Society of America DNA Polymorphism, Haplotype Structure and Balancing Selection in the Leavenworthia PgiC Locus Dmitry A. Filatov and Deborah Charlesworth Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, United Kingdom Manuscript received April 2, 1999 Accepted for publication July 6, 1999 ABSTRACT A study of DNA polymorphism and divergence was conducted for the cytosolic phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI:E.C.5.3.1.9) gene of ®ve species of the mustard genus Leavenworthia: Leavenworthia stylosa, L. alabam- ica, L. crassa, L. uni¯ora, and L. torulosa. Sequences of an internal 2.3-kb PgiC gene region spanning exons 6±16 were obtained from 14 L. stylosa plants from two natural populations and from one to several plants for each of the other species. The level of nucleotide polymorphism in L. stylosa PgiC gene was quite high (p50.051, u50.052). Although recombination is estimated to be high in this locus, extensive haplotype structure was observed for the entire 2.3-kb region. The L. stylosa sequences fall into at least two groups, distinguished by the presence of several indels and nucleotide substitutions, and one of the three charge change nucleotide replacements within the region sequenced correlates with the haplotypes. The differ- ences between the haplotypes are older than between the species, and the haplotypes are still segregating in at least two of ®ve species studied. There is no evidence of recent or ancient population subdivision that could maintain distinct haplotypes. The age of the haplotypes and the results of Kelly's ZnS and Wall's B and Q tests with recombination suggest that the haplotypes are maintained due to balancing selection at or near this locus.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Kentucky Glade Cress (Leavenworthia Exigua Var
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Kentucky Glade Cress (Leavenworthia exigua var. laciniata) Version 1.0 Christy Edwards, Missouri Botanical Garden August 2020 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Atlanta Regional Office ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This document was prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Kentucky glade cress Species Status Assessment Core Team: Stephanie DeMay (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Jessica Miller (USFWS), Lindsay Dombroskie (Texas A&M Natural Resources Institute), Jonathan Wardell (USFWS) and Drew Becker (USFWS). We would also like to recognize and thank the following individuals who served on the expert team for this SSA and provided substantive information and/or insights, valuable input into the analysis, and/or reviews of a draft of this document: Laura Darnell (Redwing Ecological Services, Inc.), Christy Edwards (Missouri Botanical Garden), Jennifer Koslow (Eastern Kentucky University), and Tara Littlefield (Office of Kentucky Nature Preserves). Further peer review was provided by James Beck (Wichita State University), Todd Crabtree (Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Natural Heritage Program), and Alfred Schotz (Auburn University Alabama Natural Heritage Program). We appreciate their input and comments, which resulted in a more robust status assessment and final report. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2020. Species status assessment report for the Kentucky Glade Cress (Leavenworthia exigua var. laciniata), Version 1.0. August 2020. Atlanta, GA. SSA Report – Kentucky Glade Cress ii August 2020 VERSION UPDATES SSA Report – Kentucky Glade Cress iii August 2020 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Leavenworthia exigua var. laciniata (Kentucky glade cress) is a winter annual herbaceous plant in the mustard family (Brassicaceae) known only from Bullitt and Jefferson Counties, Kentucky.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Genetics of Core Eudicot Inflorescence and Flower Development
    ® International Journal of Plant Developmental Biology ©2010 Global Science Books Evolutionary Genetics of Core Eudicot Inflorescence and Flower Development Jill C. Preston* Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Kansas, 1200 Sunnyside Avenue, Lawrence, KS 66045, USA Corresponding author : * [email protected] ABSTRACT The genetic basis of flowering is best understood in the model core eudicot species Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae), and involves the genetic reprogramming of shoot apical meristems, ending in the production of flowers. Although inflorescences and flowers of core eudicots share a common ground plan, variation in architecture, shape and ornamentation suggests repeated modifications to this ancestral plan. Comparative studies, primarily in Brassicaceae and Leguminoseae (rosids), and Asteraceae, Plantaginaceae and Solanaceae (asterids), have revealed a common developmental framework for flowering across core eudicots. This serves as a basis for understanding genetic changes that underlie the diversification of inflorescence and floral form. Recent work is starting to reveal the relative importance of regulatory versus protein coding changes in genes involved in diversification of inflorescence and flower development across core eudicots. Furthermore, these studies highlight the importance of phylogenetic history for understanding functional conservation of duplicated genes. _____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Keywords: Antirrhinum
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes
    The floristic and community ecology of seasonally wet limestone glade seeps of Tennessee and Kentucky Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes Austin Peay State University Department of Biology and Center of Excellence for Field Biology Clarksville, Tennessee 37044, U.S.A. [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT An open, seasonally wet seep community supporting herbaceous vegetation occurs within the limestone cedar glade complex of the southeastern United States. The purpose of this study is to describe the floristic composition of these limestone glade seeps. A floristic inventory of 9 season- ally wet sites in central Tennessee and south-central Kentucky was performed, documenting 114 species and infraspecific taxa in 91 genera and 43 families. Vegetation analysis identified the dominant taxa as Eleocharis bifida (% IV 20.3), Sporobolus vaginiflorus (% IV 11.94), Hypericum sphaerocarpum (% IV 5.97), Allium aff. stellatum (% IV 4.71), Clinopodium glabellum/arkansanum (% IV 4.15), Schoenolirion croceum (% IV 3.89), Juncus filipendulus (% IV 3.89), and Carex crawei (% IV 3.84). Gratiola quartermaniae and Isoëtes butleri are also important members of the community and may serve as indicator species. A wetland assessment of the seep community was performed according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate regional supplements. Wetland vegetation requirements are satisfied in 8 of the 9 seasonally wet sites sampled. The limestone glade seeps appear to represent a previously unclassified seasonal wetland type. RESUMEN Una comunidad abierta, húmeda estacionalmente por filtración, compuesta por vegetación herbácea se da en el complejo de pantanos cal- cáreos de cedro del sureste de los Estados Unidos.
    [Show full text]
  • A Chromosome-Scale Reference Genome of Lobularia Maritima, An
    Huang et al. Horticulture Research (2020) 7:197 Horticulture Research https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-020-00422-w www.nature.com/hortres ARTICLE Open Access A chromosome-scale reference genome of Lobularia maritima, an ornamental plant with high stress tolerance Li Huang1,YazhenMa1, Jiebei Jiang1,TingLi1, Wenjie Yang1,LeiZhang1,LeiWu1,LandiFeng1, Zhenxiang Xi1, Xiaoting Xu1, Jianquan Liu 1,2 and Quanjun Hu 1 Abstract Lobularia maritima (L.) Desv. is an ornamental plant cultivated across the world. It belongs to the family Brassicaceae and can tolerate dry, poor and contaminated habitats. Here, we present a chromosome-scale, high-quality genome assembly of L. maritima based on integrated approaches combining Illumina short reads and Hi–C chromosome conformation data. The genome was assembled into 12 pseudochromosomes with a 197.70 Mb length, and it includes 25,813 protein-coding genes. Approximately 41.94% of the genome consists of repetitive sequences, with abundant long terminal repeat transposable elements. Comparative genomic analysis confirmed that L. maritima underwent a species-specific whole-genome duplication (WGD) event ~22.99 million years ago. We identified ~1900 species-specific genes, 25 expanded gene families, and 50 positively selected genes in L. maritima. Functional annotations of these genes indicated that they are mainly related to stress tolerance. These results provide new insights into the stress tolerance of L. maritima, and this genomic resource will be valuable for further genetic improvement of this important ornamental plant. 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; Introduction ancestral species, WGDs can also promote reproductive Whole-genome duplication (WGD), or polyploidy, has isolation and thus facilitate speciation13.
    [Show full text]
  • Ovule Ratio, but No Changes in Flower Shape in Selfing Populations of The
    Erschienen in: Oecologia ; 183 (2017), 2. - S. 401-413 https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-016-3773-4 Small reductions in corolla size and pollen: ovule ratio, but no changes in flower shape in selfing populations of the North American Arabidopsis lyrata Samuel Carleial1 · Mark van Kleunen1 · Marc Stift1 Abstract The shift from outcrossing to selfing is often Introduction accompanied by striking changes in floral morphology towards a “selfing syndrome”, which is characterized by Self-incompatibility is reported over 100 plant families, flowers with reduction in size, pollen: ovule (P/O) ratio, and about half of all flowering plants possess a molecular and herkogamy. This study aims to test whether such self-incompatibility system (Raduski et al. 2012). At the changes have occurred in the North American Arabidopsis same time, the breakdown of self-incompatibility is very lyrata, which is of particular interest because of the rela- frequent (Igic et al. 2008). This has repeatedly given rise tively recent transitions to selfing in this system. Flower to the rapid evolution of self-fertilising (selfing) species, size, flower shape, herkogamy levels, P/O ratio, and flo- many of which exhibit the typical selfing syndrome, char- ral integration of six self-incompatible (outcrossing) and acterized by relatively small and inconspicuous flowers, six self-compatible (selfing) populations of A. lyrata were reduced herkogamy, and reduced pollen:ovule (P/O) ratios measured in a common environment using conventional (reviewed in Sicard and Lenhard 2011). For example, the and geometric morphometrics methods. Although selfers selfing Capsella rubella (Brassicaceae) evolved from its had on average 9.2% smaller corollas, 8.4% longer pistils, outcrossing ancestor C.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • USFWS Consultation on Transmission System Right-Of-Way Program
    United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Tennessee ES Office 446 Neal Street Cookeville, Tennessee 38501 December 18, 2018 Mr. John T. Baxter Manager, Biological Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 West Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN 37902 Re: FWS #2018-F-0958; Programmatic Consultation for Right-of-Way Vegetation Management that May Affect Endangered or Threatened Plants in the Tennessee Valley Authority Service Area Dear Mr. Baxter: This letter acknowledges the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (Service) November 21, 2018, receipt of your November 19, 2015, letter requesting initiation of formal section 7 consultation under the Endangered Species Act (Act). The consultation concerns the possible effects of your proposed Programmatic Strategy for Right-of-Way Vegetation Management that May Affect Endangered or Threatened Plants in the Tennessee Valley Authority Service Area (TVA) (the Proposed Action) on 18 federally listed plants, including: • Price's potato-bean (Apios priceana) • Braun's rock-cress (Arabis perstellata) • Pyne's ground plum (Astragalus bibullatus) • Morefield's leather-flower (Clematis morefieldii) • Alabama leather flower (Clematis socialis) • leafy prairie-clover (Dalea foliosa) • whorled sunflower (Helianthus verticillatus) • small whorled pogonia (Isotria medeoloides) • fleshy-fruit gladecress (Leavenworthia crassa) • lyre-leaf bladderpod (Lesquerella lyrata) • Spring Creek bladderpod (Lesquerella perforata) • Mohr's Barbara's buttons (Marshallia mohrii) • Cumberland sandwort (Minuartia cumberlandensis) • Short’s bladderpod (Physaria globosa) • white fringeless orchid (Platanthera integrilabia) • green pitcher plant (Sarracenia oreophila) • large-flowered skullcap (Scutellaria montana) • Tennessee yellow-eyed grass (Xyris tennesseensis) Listed species (LE=listed as endangered; LT=listed as threatened) and designated critical habitats (DCH) that TVA has determined the proposed Action is not likely to adversely affect (NLAA).
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant Community Classification for Stones River National Battlefield
    VASCULAR PLANT COMMUNITY CLASSIFICATION FOR STONES RIVER NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD Report for the Vertebrate and Vascular Plant Inventories: Appalachian Highlands and Cumberland/Piedmont Network Prepared by NatureServe for the National Park Service Southeast Regional Office October 2004 NatureServe is a non-profit organization providing the scientific knowledge that forms the basis for effective conservation action. A NatureServe Technical Report Prepared for the National Park Service under Cooperative Agreement H 5028 01 0435. Citation: Nordman, Carl. 2004. Vascular Plant Community Classification for Stones River National Battlefield. Durham, North Carolina: NatureServe. © 2004 NatureServe NatureServe 6114 Fayetteville Road, Suite 109 Durham, NC 27713 919-484-7857 International Headquarters 1101 Wilson Boulevard, 15th Floor Arlington, Virginia 22209 www.natureserve.org National Park Service Southeast Regional Office Atlanta Federal Center 1924 Building 100 Alabama Street, S.W. Atlanta, GA 30303 The view and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the U.S. Government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. This report consists of the main report along with a series of appendices with information about the plants and plant communities found at the site. Electronic files have been provided to the National Park Service in addition to hard copies. Current information on all communities described here can be found on NatureServe Explorer at www.natureserve.org/explorer. Cover photo: STRI plot 13, the Slaughter Pen. Photo by Carl Nordman. ii Acknowledgments I wish to thank all park employees, co-workers, volunteers, and academics who helped with aspects of the preparation, fieldwork, specimen identification, and report writing for this project.
    [Show full text]