Development Panel Will Meet on Tuesday 8 January 2013 at 1.00 Pm in the Wave - Maryport
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
to 21 December 2012 Development Panel Will meet on Tuesday 8 January 2013 at 1.00 pm in The Wave - Maryport Membership: Councillor Peter Bales (Chairman) Councillor John (Binky) Armstrong Councillor Carole Armstrong Councillor Bill Bacon Councillor Nicky Cockburn Councillor John Crouch Councillor Len Davies Councillor Bill Finlay Councillor Chris Garrard Councillor Joe Holliday Councillor Margaret Jackson Councillor William Jefferson Councillor Peter Kendall Councillor Jim Lister Councillor Billy Miskelly Councillor Ron Munby Councillor Margaret Snaith Councillor Sam Standage Councillor Martin Wood Councillor Joan Wright Members of the public are welcome to attend the meeting. If you ha ve any questions or queries simply contact Paula McKenzie on 01900 702557. The following Site Visits will take place: 2/2012/0683 and 2/2012/0770 – Strand House, 5 Strand Street, Maryport . Members of the Development Panel will leave from The Wave Centre, Maryport following the mornings training session. Lunch will be provided at The Wave Centre, Maryport for Members of the Panel. Agenda 1. Minutes (Pages 1 - 20) To sign as a correct record the minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 11 December 2012. 2. Apologies for absence 3. Declaration of Interest Councillors/Staff to give notice of any disclosable pecuniary interest, other registrable interest or any other interest and the nature of that interest relating to any item on the agenda in accordance with the adopted Code of Conduct. 4. Questions To answer questions from members of the public – 2 days notice of which must have been given in writing or by electronic mail. 5. Development Panel - 2/2012/0683 - Householder alterations - Strand House, 5 Strand Street, Maryport (Pages 21 - 28) 6. Develop ment Panel - 2/2012/0770 - Listed building consent for alterations to domestic dwelling - Strand House, 5 Strand Street, Maryport (Pages 29 - 34) 7. Development Panel - 2/2012/0759 - Outline for erection of 3 dwellings - Land Adjacent to Hillside, Plumbland, Aspatria (Pages 35 - 46) 8. Development Panel - 2/2012/0810 - Change of use from laundrette to pizza/burger take-away - 79 Harrington Road, Workington (Pages 47 - 56) 9. Development Panel - 2/2012/0601 - Erecti on of 3 bed dwelling - Land to rear of Hollybank House, Gilcrux (Pages 57 - 66) 10. Development Panel - 2/2012/0740 - Outline for residential development - Land at Brough Hill, Bolton Low Houses (Pages 67 - 80) 11. Development Panel - 2/2012/0823 - Erection of raised patio, external staircase and boundary wall - 52 High Street, Maryport (Pages 81 - 88) 12. Development Panel - 2/2012/0876 - Outline for dwellings - Land at Newton Arlosh (Pages 89 - 98) 13. Development Panel - 2/2012/0789 - Change of use of land to provide community garden area - Site at Garth Road, Westfield, Workington (Pages 99 - 108) 14. Development Panel - 2/2012/0817 - Domestic Extension - South Maia, Anthorn (Pages 109 - 114) 15. Development Panel - 2/2012/0859 - Extension to porch - 1 St Kentigerns Way, Aspatria (Pages 115 - 118) Chief Executive Date of next meeting Tuesday 12 February 2013 at 1.00 pm The Wave - Maryport This page is intentionally left blank Agenda Item 1 At a meeting of the Development Panel held in The Wave - Maryport on Tuesday 11 December 2012 at 1.00 pm Members P Bales (Chairman) J Armstrong J Holliday N Cockburn J Lister J Crouch B Miskelly L Davies S Standage B Finlay M G Wood C Garrard Apologies for absence were received from Councillors C M Armstrong, B Bacon, C M Jackson, W H Jefferson, R Munby, M A Snaith and J Wright. Staff Present A Dennett, K Kerrigan, S Long and P McKenzie. 419 Minutes The minutes of the meeting held on Tuesday 13 November 2012 were signed as a correct record. 420 Declaration of Interest 5. Development Panel - 2-2012-0660 - Residential development for 24 affordable dwellings and 10 open market dwellings - Land at Ellerbeck Brow, Brigham. Councillor Nicky Cockburn; Other Registrable Interest; 2/2012/0660 - Due to being the Ward Councillor. 7. Development Panel - 2-2012-0738 - Extract Duct - 35 Station Street, Cockermouth. Councillors Len Davies and Sam Standage; Other Registrable Interests; 2/2012/0738 - Due to being members of Cockermouth Town Council. 8. Development Panel - 2-2012-0768 - Outline application for detached bungalow - Sundown, Crosby. Councillor Peter Kendall; Disclosable Pecuniary Interest; 2/2012/0768 - Due to being a friend of the applicant. 9. Development Panel - 2-2012-0753 - Wind Turbine - Firs Farm, Crookdake. Councillor Bill Finlay; Other Registrable Interest; 2/2012/0753 - Due to being the Ward Councillor. 10. Development Panel - 2-2012-0631 - Outline for residential development - Rear of 51A & 53 Stainburn Road, Workington. Page 1 Councillors Peter Bales and Billy Miskelly; Other Registrable Interests; 2/2012/0631 - Due to being members of Workington Town Council. 12. Development Panel - 2-2012-0683 - Replace roof & incorporate 3 dormer windows and replacement of all windows and door, and erection of garage - Strand House, 5 Strand Street, Maryport. Councillors Peter Kendall and Martin Wood; Other Registrable Interests; 2/2012/0683 - Due to being members of Maryport Town Council. 13. Development Panel - 2-2012-0770 - Listed Building Consent for removal of wall and garage and rebuild - Stand House, 5 Stand Street, Maryport. Councillors Peter Kendall and Martin Wood; Other Registrable Interests; 2/2012/0770 - Due to being members of Maryport Town Council. 14. Development Panel - 2-2012-0703 - Erection of garage - Whiteacre, Church Road, Flimby. Councillors Peter Kendall and Martin Wood; Other Registrable Interests; 2/2012/0703 - Due to being members of Maryport Town Council. 421 Questions The following question was received from Pamela Watson: 1. How can it be justified to consider the application for Ellerbeck Brow when:- • There are at least 5 official complaints about Allerdale’s process, which have not been responded to. • The housing supply document has been held back from October until December 12th to publish. • A freedom of information act was requested on the splay and has not been responded to by the Highways Authority. These are crucial material planning considerations and they are not ready for today. The Head of Development Services responded as follows: ‘All official complaints received have, or will be, responded to in line with the Council's complaints procedure. In relation to the issue of housing land supply the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) requires Local Planning Authorities to: “Identify and update annually a supply of specific deliverable sites sufficient to provide five years worth of housing against their housing requirements”. It has always been our intention to publish this information alongside our Annual Monitoring Report which is to be published by the end of the calendar year. If the impression has been given that it was intended to publish this information by 12 December then I apologise as this was simply a date officers were working to in relation to the preparation of a draft document. The process of monitoring housing land Page 2 availability is an ongoing one and planning officers have access to this information and are aware of the current position when considering planning applications. I am however aware of the high level of current interest in relation to the housing land supply so have taken the decision to publish details of this in advance of the publication of the Annual Monitoring Report. This was published yesterday. I cannot comment on any requests made to the Highway Authority. The Highway Authority has however provided a formal consultation response to the application and it is appropriate for the Local Planning Authority to having regard to this in determining the application. I am satisfied the Council has sufficient information to enable planning officers to fully assess the proposed development and for the Development Panel to make an informed decision on the application proposals’. 422 Site Visits The following Councillors were present at the site inspections, planning references 2/2012/0670, 18 Braeside, Seaton, 2/2012/0631, Land rear of 51a and 53 Stainburn Road, Workington and 2/2012/0660, Land to the west of Ellerbeck Brow, Brigham. J Armstrong, P Bales, N Cockburn, L Davies, C Garrard, J Holliday, P Kendall, B Miskelly and S Standage. 423 Public participation The following objectors/applicants addressed the Panel. W Patterson, M Greaves and N Cockton outlined their objections to application 2/2012/0660. The agent B Barden exercised his right of reply. R Wolfe, V Hewitson, D Williams, J. K. Rylands and Councillor P Roberts outlined their objections to application 2/2012/0315. The agent D Staniland exercised his right of reply. Councillor D Mossom and Councillor J Colhoun outlined their objections to application 2/2012/0768. The agent Peter Kendall exercised his right of reply. M Fitzgerald, J. A. Keighley, A Brown, Councillor P Roberts and Councillor L Douglas outlined their objections to application 2/2012/0753. The agent Richard Horton exercised his right of reply. V Graham outlined her objections to application 2/2012/0670. The agent T Hayton did not exercise his right of reply. 424 Development Panel - 2-2012-0660 - Residential development for 24 affordable dwellings and 10 open market dwellings - Land at Ellerbeck Brow, Brigham Councillor J Holliday left the meeting and did not vote. Page 3 The application: Residential development for 24 affordable dwellings and 10 open market dwellings including associated infrastructure, Land to East of Ellerbeck Brow, Brigham, Cockermouth. The Principal Planning Officer recommended Approval subject to conditions and a Section 106 Legal Agreement. Members were advised of the relevant planning history - SCR/2012/0022 - A screening opinion determined that the proposal for residential development was not EIA development 16th May 2012. 1987/0885 - Outline application for residential development of approximately 25 units. Refused. This refusal decision was subsequently appealed and the appeal was dismissed. The appeal decision was summarised as follows: • The first issue related to whether the District had an adequate 5 year land supply at the time.