DOCSLIB.ORG

Representations and Manifestations of an Empire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Representations and Manifestations of an Empire BetweenThe Oxford Constantines Byzantine Society presents representations and manifestations of an empire Friday 4 March 2011 Provisional Schedule 10:00 Session 1 2:15 Session 3 Representing the Self: Understanding Late Roman The imperial cult of saints in the Macedonian Dynasty Mausolea in Pannonia and Dalmatia Miroslav Popovic Zsolt R. Magyar University of Belgrade Central European University, Budapest Labelling the Local: The Archangel Michael of Chonai The Architecture of The Episcopal Church in Doclea Alex Rodriguez Suarez (Montenegro) University of London – King’s College Tatjana Koprivica History Institute of Montenegro, Podgorica ‘The Land of the Beautiful Horses’: The archaeology of medieval stables in Cappadocia Byzantine Fortifications in the Iberian Peninsula Filiz Tütüncü Çağlar Danielle Donaldson University of Victoria, Canada Trinity College, Cambridge 4:30 Session 4 11:45 Session 2 Mantzikert reversed? The last campaign of Alexios I Journey to the East: Beyond Space and Time (The Life of Komnenos in the Alexiad of Anna Komnene St. Macarius the Roman) Roman Shlyakhtin Z. D. Ainalis Central European University, Budapest University of Paris I–Panthéon-Sorbonne A tale of two castles: Katsamon, Ras and the grand Singing Your Praises: Depictions of Emperors and strategy of John II Komnenos Imperial Rule in the Hymnic Collection of James of Maximilian C G Lau Edessa Oriel College, Oxford Simon Ford Exeter College, Oxford ‘In the world but not of it’: the contribution of the monastic economy to the functioning of trading Rural existences of early medieval Byzantium in networks in the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries Niketas’s Life of St Philaretos Gary Pitts Adam Izdebski University of London – Royal Holloway University of Warsaw BetweenThe Oxford Constantines Byzantine Society presents representations and manifestations of an empire Saturday 5 March 2011 – Morning Provisional Schedule Lecture Theatre Colin Matthew Room 9:30 Session 5 9:30 Session 6 The movements of manuscripts between Byzantium and From Roman to Byzantine Law: The Change in the Arabic world and the hypothesis of the role of the Testamentary Deeds from Late-Antique Egypt Graeco-Arabic translation movement in the revival of Maria Nowak literary production in Byzantium University of Warsaw Jakub Sypiański University of Paris I–Panthéon-Sorbonne The imitatio Constantinopolitanae urbis as a means of legitimacy and political propaganda in Late Antiquity Psaltika and Asmatika in the liturgical history of the Carmen Eguiluz Méndez Byzantine Empire University of Cantabria, Santander Olga Grinchenko Brasenose College, Oxford The effects of the Slav invasions in the Balkans in the sixth-century Eustathios of Thessaloniki: The Parekbolai on the Iliad. Agata Koziej The Christian modifications made by Eustathios to pagan Nicolas Copernicus University, Torun elements and polytheistic expressions in the Homeric text Georgia Kolovou University of Paris IV–Sorbonne 11:15 Session 8 The Politics of Memory and Visual Politics: Comparing 11:15 Session 7 the Self-representation of Constantine and Augustus Mariana Bodnaruk Byzance et l’Égypte: influence ou confrontation, Central European University, Budapest l’exemple des icônes médiévales de l’église Saint- Mercure du Vieux-Caire Cities of God: Space and Memory in Victor of Vita’s Julien Auber de Lapierre History of the Vandal Persecution École pratique des Hautes Études, Paris Luke Gardiner Corpus Christi College, Cambridge ‘You who once were far away have been brought near’: The ministry cycle in the Church of the Theotokos in Les inventions de reliques dans l’Empire byzantin Ohrid Estelle Cronnier Ivona Pandzak University of Paris I–Panthéon-Sorbonne European University – Republic of Macedonia, Skopje The Adoption and Propagation of Ancient Civilizations’ The painted decoration in the Church of Holy Anargyroi Cultural and Architectural Heritage in the Byzantine at Sangri, Naxos: Observations on the monumental art Empire: Influences from Egyptian Culture of Naxos during the middle and late Byzantine periods Vera Dubrovina Theodora Konstantellou Stroganov Moscow State University of Industrial and Applied University of Athens Arts, Moscow The Representation of Stefan Dušan as New Constantine in the Church of St. George at Pološko in Macedonia Ana Ristovska École pratique des Hautes Études, Paris BetweenThe Oxford Constantines Byzantine Society presents representations and manifestations of an empire Saturday 5 March 2011 – Afternoon Provisional Schedule Lecture Theatre Colin Matthew Room 2:00 Session 9 2:00 Session 10 Magical Remedies in Late Antique Medical Handbooks Jerusalem, Jerash, and Caesarea: late antique urban Petros Bouras-Vallianatos contexts in the Levant Kellogg College, Oxford Morgan Dirodi St. Cross College, Oxford The Dream of Caesar Bardas Jonas J.H. Christensen Across the Desert Sands: The Shifting Routes of University of Copenhagen Southern Palestine and Transjordan in Late Antiquity Marlena Whiting Between Aries and Orion: Stars, planets and signs in the Lincoln College, Oxford Alexander Romance Caterina Franchi Between Empires: Early Christian architecture in Exeter College, Oxford southern Mesopotamia and Persian Gulf region Agnieszka Lic The Prophecy of the Last Roman Emperor: Jagiellonian University, Kraków Transformation and Influence of an anti-Muslim topos Andras Kraft Halabiya Zenobia: boire, mangér, stockér au VIIème Central European University. Budapest siècle Nairusz Haidar-Vela University of Paris I–Panthéon-Sorbonne 4:15 Session 11 Roger de Flor’s Campaign of 1304 in Western Anatolia: A Reinterpretation 4:15 Session 12 Wiktor Ostasz Signs in the shape of Greek letters on frescos in Roman St. Peter’s College, Oxford catacombs: comments on interpretations of so-called ‘gammadia’ No Triumphs, Just Words: Competing Political Maciej Szymaszek Discourses in Early Fifteenth Century Byzantium Pontifical University of John Paul II, Krakow Florin Leonte Central European University, Budapest The wreathed cross or stephanostaurion on sixth-century marble chancel screens in the Mediterranean region The end is nearing – omens of the Fall of Constantinople Bernard Mulholland Annika Asp Queens University, Belfast Exeter College, Oxford The Problematic of Iconoclasm in Byzantine Art Historical Periodisation Adam Levine Corpus Christi College, Oxford.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Discovering Isaac Komnenos and the Letter of Aristeas
    READING BETWEEN THE LINES OF A BYZANTINE ‘PARAPHRASE’: (RE)DISCOVERING ISAAC KOMNENOS AND THE LETTER OF ARISTEAS Valeria Flavia Lovato Introduction: the illustrated Octateuchs and Isaac Komnenos In a recent study on the illuminated Octateuchs, Lowden has defined this group of luxurious manuscripts as a typically ‘Byzantine phenomenon’.1 The present paper focuses on one such manuscript, namely the Seraglio Octateuch, generally attributed to the patronage of the sebastokratōr Isaac Komnenos Porphyrogen- netos, son of emperor Alexios I and brother of John II.2 More specifically, in what follows I will focus on the so-called paraphrase of the Letter of Aristeas,3 a unique feature of the Seraglio manuscript. This short text, meant as a sort of introduction to the whole codex, was most likely penned by Isaac Komnenos himself.4 The This article is part of a project funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (PostDoc. Mobility Grant number P400PH_180700). I would like to thank Tommaso Braccini and Aglae Pizzone for their comments on previous drafts. Special thanks are owed to Nancy Patterson Ševčenko and Michiel Op de Coul for allowing me to read their unpublished work. 1 J. Lowden, Illustrated Octateuch Manuscripts: A Byzantine Phenomenon, in: P. Mag- dalino – R. S. Nelson (eds), The Old Testament in Byzantium. Washington D.C. 2010, 107-152. 2 On Isaac Komnenos as the most likely commissioner of the Seraglio Octateuch see, most recently, K. Linardou, Imperial Impersonations: Disguised Portraits of a Komnenian Prince and his Father, in: A. Bucossi – A. Rodriguez Suarez (eds), John II Komnenos, Emperor of Byzantium. In the Shadow of Father and Son.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Byzantine Aesthetics and the Incomparability of Islamic
    Bryn Mawr College Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College History of Art Faculty Research and Scholarship History of Art 2010 Middle Byzantine Aesthetics and the Incomparability of Islamic Art: The Architectural Ekphraseis of Nikolaos Mesarites Alicia Walker Bryn Mawr College, [email protected] Let us know how access to this document benefits ouy . Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs Custom Citation Alicia Walker, "Middle Byzantine Aesthetics and the Incomparability of Islamic Art: The Architectural Ekphraseis of Nikolaos Mesarites," Muqarnas 27 (2010): 79-101. This paper is posted at Scholarship, Research, and Creative Work at Bryn Mawr College. http://repository.brynmawr.edu/hart_pubs/57 For more information, please contact [email protected]. ALICIA WALKER MIDDLE BYZANTINE AESTHETICS OF POWER AND THE INCOMPARABILITY OF ISLAMIC ART: THE ARCHITECTURAL EKPHRASEIS OF NIKOLAOS MESARITES An early thirteenth-century historical treatise, The between churches and this building, or between sacred Palace Revolt of John Komnenos by Nikolaos Mesa­ and imperial icons and the images on the ceiling ofthe rites, an author of the middle Byzantine period (ca. Mouchroutas. Rather, these juxtapositions were con­ 843-1204), contains a passage that briefly describes an structed by Mesarites and indicate his reception of, not Islamic-style building, the Mouchroutas, which was part the original intentions behind, the Islamicizing work of of the imperial palace complex in Constantinople (see art. Appendix).l The author emphatically states that the Nikolaos Mesarites (d. ca. 1214) was a Byzantine structure was the work of "a Persian hand," that is to courtier from a prominent family.
    [Show full text]
  • 12 Coinage, Numismatic Circulation and Monetary Policy Under
    12 Coinage, numismatic circulation and monetary policy under John II Komnenos (1118–1143) Pagona Papadopoulou When the emperor of Nicaea, John III Vatatzes (1222–54), decided sometime in the late 1220s to resume the minting of gold coinage that had been suspended since 1204, he selected as his prototype the hyperpyron of his namesake, the twelfth- century emperor, John II Komnenos (1118–43) (Figure 12.1).1 Vatatzes closely imitated not only the iconography of the coin, but its epigraphy as well. Thus, the porphyrogennetos epithet, to which he had no right, figures prominently on his hyperpyra. The emperor’s choice to imitate coins dating back more than a century was most probably dictated by the prestige of the Komnenos name and the desire to connect himself with the celebrated family, something characteristic of every thirteenth-century Byzantine ruler.2 Through imitation, John Vatatzes aimed at creating a visual connection with the imperial past, and more particularly with John Komnenos, whose high-standing reputation as a ruler had earned him the nickname Kaloioannes ( John the Good).3 1 The great similarity between these thirteenth-century imitativehyperpyra and their twelfth-century prototypes led numismatists to lengthy discussions regarding the correct attribution of specific groups of coins. It is now generally agreed that hyperpyra of this type bearing mint marks (sigla) should be attrib- uted to the thirteenth century, but the matter is far from a definitive solution, especially since the Latin empire of Constantinople seems also to have minted gold hyperpyra of the same type, known as perperi latini. See E.
    [Show full text]
  • From Huns Into Persians: the Projected Identity of the Turks in the Byzantine Rhetoric of Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries
    From Huns into Persians: The Projected Identity of the Turks in the Byzantine Rhetoric of Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries By Roman Shliakhtin Supervisor: Daniel Ziemann, Niels Gaul Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department Central European University, Budapest In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies CEU eTD Collection Budapest 2016 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor professor Niels Gaul who fostered my talents and supported me. His care and trust helped me to overcome many obstacles I met on the way and stimulated me to challenge my own limits and systematize my results. I express gratitude to my supervisor Daniel Ziemann and to the pre-defense committee members Volker Menze and Tijana Krstic. I also thank my first teacher Rustam Shukurov who encouraged me to start the project in 2007 and keeps supporting me with his friendship and advice up to the present day. I thank my colleagues and friends Mariana Bodnaruk, Marijana Vukovic, Andras Kraft and Divna Manolova who read parts of this dissertation at the later stage. I express my gratitude to my mentor and the former head of the Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Studies Program, professor Michael Maas who commented on the methodology of the project. I also thank Head of the PhD Program Alice Choyke and PhD Coordinator Csilla Dobos for their patience and help. I express my appreciation to the following specialists for sharing their expertise and providing feedback on my project: Mary Cunningham, Leslie Brubaker, Michael Jeffreys, Elizabeth Jeffreys, Michael Angold, Mark Whittow, Ingella Nilsson, Ruth Macrides and Paul Magdalino.
    [Show full text]
  • Print This Article
    Byzantina Symmeikta Vol. 21, 2011 Andronikos I Komnenos: A Greek Tragedy MAGOULIAS Harry https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.1032 Copyright © 2014 Harry J. MAGOULIAS To cite this article: MAGOULIAS, H. (2011). Andronikos I Komnenos: A Greek Tragedy. Byzantina Symmeikta, 21(1), 101-136. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/byzsym.1032 http://epublishing.ekt.gr | e-Publisher: EKT | Downloaded at 01/10/2021 20:22:58 | HARRY J. MAGOULIAS ANDRONIKOS I KO M NENOS : A GREEK TRAGEDY The annals of Niketas Choniates1 chronicle the period of Byzantine history beginning with the death of Alexios I Komnenos on 15/16 August 1118, and ending with the events of the historian’s flight to Nikaia in the autumn of 1207 following the fall of Constantinople to the Fourth Crusade. While translating the text I became intrigued by the fate of Emperor Andronikos I Komnenos (1183-1185)2 who, in certain aspects of his life-style, is depicted as a mirror image of his first cousin, Emperor Manuel I Komnenos 1. O City of Byzantium, Annals of Niketas Choniates, English translation by H. J. MAGOULIAS , Detroit 1984. The pagination cited from the annals is placed between parenthesis together with NH. See Introduction xI-xvI. For Niketas Choniates (ca.1155/56-1215/16) see A. SI M PSON – S. EF th Y M IADIS (eds.), Niketas Choniates. A Historian and a Writer, Geneva 2009, especially A. SI M PSON , Niketas Choniates: the Historian (13-34), and S. EF th Y M IADES , Niketas Choniates: The Writer (35-58). On his theological treatise Treasury of Orthodoxy, also known as Δογματικὴ Πανοπλία, see H.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Empire Roman Empire
    NON- FICTION UNABRIDGED Edward Gibbon THE Decline and Fall ––––––––––––– of the ––––––––––––– Roman Empire Read by David Timson Volum e I V 1 Chapter 37 10:00 2 Athanasius introduced into Rome... 10:06 3 Such rare and illustrious penitents were celebrated... 8:47 4 Pleasure and guilt are synonymous terms... 9:52 5 The lives of the primitive monks were consumed... 9:42 6 Among these heroes of the monastic life... 11:09 7 Their fiercer brethren, the formidable Visigoths... 10:35 8 The temper and understanding of the new proselytes... 8:33 9 The passionate declarations of the Catholic... 9:40 10 VI. A new mode of conversion... 9:08 11 The example of fraud must excite suspicion... 9:14 12 His son and successor, Recared... 12:03 13 Chapter 38 10:07 14 The first exploit of Clovis was the defeat of Syagrius... 8:43 15 Till the thirtieth year of his age Clovis continued... 10:45 16 The kingdom of the Burgundians... 8:59 17 A full chorus of perpetual psalmody... 11:18 18 Such is the empire of Fortune... 10:08 19 The Franks, or French, are the only people of Europe... 9:56 20 In the calm moments of legislation... 10:31 2 21 The silence of ancient and authentic testimony... 11:39 22 The general state and revolutions of France... 11:27 23 We are now qualified to despise the opposite... 13:38 24 One of these legislative councils of Toledo... 11:59 25 A monk, who in the profound ignorance... 8:30 26 In a century of perpetual..
    [Show full text]
  • The Column of Constantine at Constantinople: a Cultural History (330-1453 C.E.)
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 9-2017 The Column of Constantine at Constantinople: A Cultural History (330-1453 C.E.) Carey Thompson Wells The Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/2213 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] THE COLUMN OF CONSTANTINE AT CONSTANTINOPLE: A CULTURAL HISTORY (330-1453 C.E.) BY CAREY THOMPSON WELLS A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2017 © 2017 CAREY THOMPSON WELLS All Rights Reserved ii The Column of Constantine at Constantinople: A Cultural History (330-1453 C.E.) By Carey Thompson Wells This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Liberal Studies in satisfaction of the thesis requirement for the degree in Master of Arts. _______________________ _____________________________ Date Dr. Eric Ivison Thesis Advisor _______________________ _____________________________ Date Dr. Elizabeth Macaulay-Lewis Executive Officer THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii Abstract The Column of Constantine at Constantinople A Cultural History (330-1453 C.E.) By Carey Thompson Wells Advisor: Dr. Eric Ivison This thesis discusses the cultural history of the Column of Constantine at Constantinople, exploring its changing function and meaning from Late Antiquity to the end of the Byzantine era.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronological Overview
    Chronological Overview 284-305 Diocletian and the tetrarchy 565-591 Wars with Persia 306-337 Constantine I (sole ruler from 324) 566 + Slavs begin to infiltrate across Danube frontier; pressure 311 Edict of toleration issued by Galerius on frontier fortresses from Avars 312 Constantine's victory at the Milvian bridge 568+ Lombards driven westward from Danube, invade Italy 313 Edict of toleration issued by Constantine and Licinius 572 Lombards besiege Ravenna 325 Council of Nicaea and condemnation of Arianism (first 577 Major invasion of Balkans led by Avars ecumenical council) 584, 586 Avaro-Slav attacks on Thessalonica 330 Consecration of Constantinople 591-602 Gradual success in pushing Avars back across Danube 337 Baptism and death of Constantine I 602 Maurice overthrown, Phokas proclaimed emperor 361-363 Julian the Apostate leads pagan reaction and attempts to 603 War with Persia; situation in Balkans deteriorates limit the influence of Christianity 610 Phokas overthrown by Heraclius, son of exarch of Africa 364 Jovian dies: empire divided between Valentinian 1 (West) at Carthage and Valens (East) 611-620s Central and northern Balkans lost 378 Defeat and death of Valens at hands of Visigoths at battle 614-619 Persians occupy Syria, Palestine and Egypt of Adrianople 622 Mohammed leaves Mecca for Medina (the 'Hijra') 381 First Council of Constantinople (second ecumenical 622-627 Heraclius campaigns in east against Persians council): reaffirms rejection of Arianism; asserts right of 626 Combined Avaro-Slav and Persian siege of Constantinople
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Empire Roman Empire
    NON- FICTION UNABRIDGED Edward Gibbon THE Decline and Fall ––––––––––––– of the ––––––––––––– Roman Empire Read by David Timson Volum e I 1 Chapter 1 9:25 2 But the superior merit of Agricola... 10:54 3 The terror of the Roman arms added weight... 9:24 4 Nine centuries of war had gradually introduced... 9:21 5 The camp of a Roman legion presented the appearance... 10:04 6 Ancient Gaul, as it contained the whole country... 10:36 7 Such was the state of Europe under the Roman emperors. 10:43 8 Chapter 2 8:46 9 Notwithstanding the fashionable irreligion which prevailed... 9:08 10 Till the privileges of Romans had been progressively extended... 7:33 11 So sensible were the Romans of the influence of language... 8:54 12 Hope, the best comfort of our imperfect condition... 7:47 13 It is natural to suppose that the greatest number... 11:11 14 We have computed the inhabitants, and contemplated... 9:38 15 Whatever evils either reason or declamation have imputed... 7:08 16 But it is no easy task to confine luxury... 11:44 17 Chapter 3 6:08 18 Amidst this confusion of sentiments... 9:08 19 Although Augustus considered a military force… 8:09 20 By declaring themselves the protectors of the people... 10:39 2 21 I: The death of Caesar was ever before his eyes. 9:49 22 Nerva had scarcely accepted the purple... 10:09 23 If a man were called to fix the period in the history... 12:44 24 Chapter 4 9:31 25 One evening (A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sebastokrator Isaac Komnenos: Manuel I’S Latinophile Uncle?
    Chapter 8 The Sebastokrator Isaac Komnenos: Manuel i’s Latinophile Uncle? Alex Rodriguez Suarez The 11th and 12th centuries witnessed significant interaction between the Byzantines and the Latins.1 The latter, namely Western Europeans who followed the Roman rite and used Latin as their religious and scholarly language, had increased their presence in Byzantine territory from the 11th century onwards. Among them were pilgrims, mercenaries, merchants, envoys, scholars, mem- bers of the nobility and clergymen that came from a wide range of locations, such as the Italian peninsula, Scandinavia, England, France, Flanders, Germa- ny and Hungary. The Komnenian dynasty certainly encouraged the contacts with the Latins. The difficult situation of the Byzantine Empire at the end of the 11th century forced the Emperor Alexios i (1081–1118) to request military support from Western Europe. Robert Guiscard’s invasion of the Balkans in 1081 led the emperor to grant significant commercial privileges to the Venetians in exchange for their naval support against the Norman fleet. This resulted in the establishment of their own commercial quarter in Constantinople.2 Years later, in order to regain Asia Minor from the Turks, Byzantine envoys asked help from Urban ii. The pope’s call set the First Crusade in motion.3 Despite his con- tacts with the Latin West, it is not Alexios but his grandson Manuel i (1143–80) who is considered as the Latinophile emperor par excellence. Among the rea- sons for such a label, Byzantinists argue that Manuel married two Western women, Bertha of Sulzbach and Maria of Antioch. He also introduced Western tournaments in the Byzantine army in which the emperor and members of 1 This contribution is based on sections of my PhD dissertation “The Western presence in the Byzantine Empire during the reigns of Alexios i and John ii Komnenos (1081–1143).” (King’s College London, 2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Imperial Image
    University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. List of Illustrations Figure Facing Page 1. Silver tetradrachm of Philip II (359-336 BC) 1 2. Orich sestertius of Trajan (AD 98-117) 1 3. Gold solidus of Justin II (565-78) 1 4. Gold solidus of Anastasios (491-518) 2 5. Bronze coin of Arcadios (383-408) 2 6. Silver ceremonial coin of Leo III (717-41) 2 7. Class 13 copper trachy of Andronikos III (1328-41) 3 8. Class 12 copper trachy of Andronikos III (1328-41) 3 9. Class 14 copper trachy of Andronikos III (1328-41) 3 10. Aspron trachy nomisma in electrum of John II (1118-43) 4 11. Class IV gold histamenon of Constantine IX (1042-55) 4 12. Silver miliaresion of Constantine IX (1042-55) 4 13. Portrait of Basil II (976-1025) 5 14. The Barberini Ivory, c. 6th century 6 15. Class I gold histamenon of Isaac I (1057-59) 7 16. Class II gold histamenon of Isaac I (1057-59) 7 17. Silver miliaresion of Michael VII (1071-78) 7 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Searching for the Pantokrator Hospital an Honors Thesis
    Healing on the Fourth Hill: Searching for the Pantokrator Hospital An Honors Thesis (HONRS 499) By Tyler Wolford Thesis Advisor Christine Shea ~~ Ball State University Muncie, Indiana May 2012 Expected Date Of Graduation May 2012 Abstract The Pantokrator Hospital is the best understood of all Byzantine Hospitals. Almost one third of the monastic charter of the Pantokrator Monastery is devoted to the hospital. The archaeological ruins around the remains of the Pantokrator Monastery (Zeyrek Mosque), however, have not received as much attention. The ruins around the Zeyrek Mosque consist of cisterns, water conduits, terraces, and other Byzantine structures. They paint a complicated and yet important picture of the monastery and its hospital. Despite the fact that a previous study by Alice Taylor had concluded that the hospital was most likely southwest of the Zeyrek Mosque, it is more likely that the Pantokrator Hospital was located north of the mosque on a set of terraces recorded by Ernst Mamboury. Based on the newest survey of the Byzantine water supply by James Crow, Jonathan Bardill, and Richard Bayliss, the latest understand of Byzantine medicine, and a critical hypothesis of the previous history of the hospital by Paul Magdalino, it is evident that this area provided not only the most likely location but also the best one for this important l2'h century institution due to its proximity to a key Byzantine water line and the main streets of Constantinople. Acknowledgements I would like to thank Dr. Christine Shea for her support not only on this project but also during my entire undergraduate career.
    [Show full text]