DOCSLIB.ORG

Ngati Tuwharetoa Deed of Settlement Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

"A" NGATI TUWHARETOA and TE KOTAHITANGA O NGATI TUWHARETOA and THE CROWN DEED OF SETTLEMENT OF HISTORICAL CLAIMS 8 July 2017 NGATI TUWHARETOA DEED OF SETTLEMENT PURPOSE OF THIS DEED This deed - • sets out an account of the acts and omissions of the Crown before 21 September 1992 that affected Ngati Tuwharetoa and breached Te Tiriti o Waitangi/the Treaty of Waitangi and its principles; and • provides an acknowledgement by the Crown of the Treaty breaches and an apology; and • settles the historical claims of Ngati Tuwharetoa; and • specifies the cultural redress, and the financial and commercial redress, to be provided in settlement to the governance entity that has been approved by Ngati Tuwharetoa to receive the redress; and • includes definitions of - - the historical claims; and - Ngati Tuwharetoa; and • provides for other relevant matters; and • is conditional upon settlement legislation coming into force. 1 NGATI TUWHARETOA DEED OF SETTLEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TE KAPUA WHAKAPIPI............................................................................................................ 5 NGA POU E TORU (THE THREE POU)................................................................................ 9 1 BACKGROUND............................................................................................................... 12 2 HISTORICAL ACCOUNT............................................................................................... 14 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND APOLOGY................................................................ 115 4 SETTLEMENT...............................................................................................................127 5 TE POU TUATAHI: TONGARIRO TE MAUNGA.....................................................132 6 TE POU TUARUA: TE MAt APUNA O TE WAI, TE AHI TAMOU........................ 134 7 TE POU TUATORU: T0WHARETOA TE IWI, T0WHARETOA TE HAPO 152 8 GENERAL CULTURAL REDRESS............................................................................161 9 FINANCIAL AND COMMERCIAL REDRESS...........................................................173 10 SETTLEMENT LEGISLATION, CONDITIONS AND TERMINATION..................178 11 GENERAL, DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION............................................. 180 2 NGATI TUWHARETOA DEED OF SETTLEMENT SCHEDULES GENERAL MATTERS 1. Implementation of settlement 2. Interest 3. Tax 4. Notice 5. Miscellaneous 6. Defined terms 7. Interpretation PROPERTY REDRESS 1. Disclosure information and warranty 2. Vesting of cultural redress properties 3. Commercial redress properties 4. Deferred selection property and deferred selection geothermal assets 5. Deferred purchase 6. Terms of transfer for commercial redress properties, purchased deferred selection property and purchased deferred selection geothermal assets 7. Notice in relation to redress properties, deferred selection property and deferred selection geothermal assets 8. Definitions DOCUMENTS 1. Deed of Trust (Tongariro National Trout Centre) 2. Ngati TGwharetoa values 3. Protection principles 4. Statements of association 5. Protocols 6. Relationship Agreement with the Ministry for the Environment 7. Te Piringa Agreement with Department of Conservation 8. Encumbrances 9. RFR deed over quota ATTACHMENTS 1. Area of interest 2. Deed plans 3. RFR area 4. Properties understood to remain as Collective RFR Properties as at the date of this deed 5. Draft settlement bill 3 NGATI TUWHARETOA DEED OF SETTLEMENT DEED OF SETTLEMENT THIS DEED is made between NGATI TUWHARETOA and TE KOTAHITANGA O NGATI TUWHARETOA and THE CROWN 4 NGATI TUWHARETOA DEED OF SETTLEMENT TE KAPUA WHAKAPIPI Ko Tongariro te maunga Ko Taupo te moana Ko Tuwharetoa te iwi Ko Te Heuheu te tangata Within these simple words are encapsulated the very essence of who and what Ngati Tuwharetoa are as a people. From a Tuwharetoa perspective, the past, present and future are seen as a cyclical continuum, each giving relevance and meaning to the other. Therefore, within this context we will begin the journey of our people with the haerenga that Te Ariki Ta Tumu Te Heuheu undertook between 2012 and 2014. On this haerenga, Te Ariki visited each and every hapu of Ngati Tuwharetoa to listen to the people and to learn what their aspirations were for their hapu and for their mokopuna. The resulting vision is a blueprint for the future of Ngati Tuwharetoa named Te Kapua Whakapipi. The text that follows is the speech that Te Ariki delivered to every hapu on his haerenga. "TGKINO (VIII) TE ARIKI TUMU TE HEUHEU Ka tTtiro whanui au I gaze into the distance Ki nga kokonga o toku rohe To the corners of my lands Kei reira nga mana o te motu To where the prestige of land lays Ko nga whanau, nga marae, nga hapu The whanau, marae, hapu Ki mai nga korero o o matua tupuna The old people our koroua and kuia cry out Whakaponotia! Manaakitia! Pumautia Believe in them! Care for them! Hold fast through the tikanga of Ngati Tuwharetoa Tihei mauri ora! "Ko Tuwharetoa te iwi, ko Tuwharetoa te hapu" This statement, once spoken by our kaumatua, is a timely reminder of the permanence and the resilience of our whakapapa and its centrality in defining our identity and our unity as Ngati Tuwharetoa. When our kaumatua spoke of hapu, they were intimately aware of the existence of whanau and hapu whakapapa that established unique, but overlapping lines of history, that are boundless through time, geography, and space. Each of us, and each of our hapu, are able to travel along a relatively unique journey through the pathways of our whakapapa. The above statement is important because it epitomises our strength and our capacity to unreservedly acknowledge the whakapapa bonds that bind and unite us as Ngati Tuwharetoa. 5 NGATI TUWHARETOA DEED OF SETTLEMENT TE KAPUA WHAKAPIPI Our whakapapa is the foundation of our identity; it is the foundation of who we are. It is the source of our whakakotahitanga because it combines the collective strength of all our hapG of Ngati TGwharetoa through bonds that are real, emphatic and established by our collective commitment to our TGwharetoatanga. Throughout Ngati TGwharetoa's history, this mindset has dominated. It has been clearly demonstrated in our continued survival and development, despite the erosive interference of colonial rule and its introduced laws. So I urge us all to maintain our respect for our TGwharetoatanga and to preserve this as our ultimate platform of strength in moving forward to implement a collective vision that will deliver us with a future that our mokopuna and their descendants will forever cherish. This is not to deny the rightful importance we place in our whanau and our hapG, but it does commit us to acknowledge those bonds that unite us all as Ngati TGwharetoa. We are indeed very fortunate that our vision for the future has been inspired by the outstanding deeds of our Ngati TGwharetoa tGpuna. Our whakapapa is here and it is that, of which we are all wanting to cherish. We have witnessed a rapacious colonial mindset and a hunger that has severed and weakened our people's relationship with our taonga tuku iho. In the process, we have been subjected to the systematic political and legislative erosion of our traditional beliefs and values, and all of this has imposed a heavy toll on the many facets of our wellbeing. We take heart in the fact that our history does illustrate our remarkable resilience for survival in a world of incredible challenge and uncertainty. Our survival is attributed to the legacy laid down for us by our ancestors, originating with our eponymous ancestor Ngatoroirangi. Our adherence to upholding the values and relationships between ourselves as a people and our environment has never wavered; Ngati TGwharetoa has never ceded our authority within our rohe, each generation upholding the legacy of Ngatoroirangi. Thus, seeing the past, present and future as a continuum, Ngati TGwharetoa is an ontological reflection of our environment and vice versa, one unable to exist without the other. We hold fast to this understanding that it may continue to be the foundation for our generations to come. Through my recent engagements with our hapG of Ngati TGwharetoa, I am learning that many of us share similar concerns and frustrations about the current state of our wellbeing, and the erosive impacts of external forces on our TGwharetoatanga. I am inspired to hear, however, that our aspirations and visions for ourselves, and our mokopuna, are remarkably similar, and that you share a passion to develop a clearer collective vision for our future. How this vision is shaped and realised will be something that each individual and hapG will no doubt have views on, and we must address this in a timely and constructive manner. At our hapG hui I have received many suggestions on what needs to be fixed and how things may be improved. I am recording these suggestions and they will be given very serious consideration, as will the range and nature of solutions that may be possible. I will not pre-empt this thinking before I have had the opportunity to hear from all our hapG. At this early stage of our korero, I want to emphasise the following thoughts: Tikanga: our tikanga is a central consideration in the blueprint that we develop for our future. I need not explain the tikanga, as you are well aware of the key concepts and components, and the importance of maintaining our reo rangatira. Many of our people have already raised grave concerns over the apparent decline in the number of kaumatua and pakeke who are able to
Recommended publications
  • The Native Land Court, Land Titles and Crown Land Purchasing in the Rohe Potae District, 1866 ‐ 1907

    The Native Land Court, Land Titles and Crown Land Purchasing in the Rohe Potae District, 1866 ‐ 1907

    Wai 898 #A79 The Native Land Court, land titles and Crown land purchasing in the Rohe Potae district, 1866 ‐ 1907 A report for the Te Rohe Potae district inquiry (Wai 898) Paul Husbands James Stuart Mitchell November 2011 ii Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Report summary .................................................................................................................................. 1 The Statements of Claim ..................................................................................................................... 3 The report and the Te Rohe Potae district inquiry .............................................................................. 5 The research questions ........................................................................................................................ 6 Relationship to other reports in the casebook ..................................................................................... 8 The Native Land Court and previous Tribunal inquiries .................................................................. 10 Sources .............................................................................................................................................. 10 The report’s chapters ......................................................................................................................... 20 Terminology .....................................................................................................................................
  • 12 GEO V 1921 No 64 Waikato and King-Country Counties

    12 GEO V 1921 No 64 Waikato and King-Country Counties

    604 1~21, No. 64.J Waikato and King-country Oounties. [12 GEO. V. New Zealand. Title. ANALYSIS. 1. Short Title and commencement. 10. Boundaries of Raglan County altered. 2. Act deemed to be a special Act. 11. Boundaries of Waikato County altered. 3. Otorohanga County constituted. 12. Boundaries of Piako County altered. 4. Taumarunui County constituted. 13. Boundaries of Waipa County altered. 5. Application of Counties Act, 1920. 14. Taupo East and Taupo West Counties united. 6. Awakino and Waitomo Counties abolished, and 15. Road districts abolished. Waitomo County constituted. 16. Taupo Road District constituted. 7. Antecedent liabilities of Awakino and Wal­ 17. Application of provisions of Counties Act, 1920, tomo County C,ouncils to be antecedent in respect of alterations of boundaries. liability of new Waitomo County. 18. Temporary provision for control of certain 8. System ,of rating in Waitomo County. districts. 9. Boundaries of Kawhia County altered. Schedules. 1921-22, No. 64 . Title .AN ACT to give Effect to the Report of the Commission appointed under Section Ninety-one of the Reserves and other Lands Disposal and Public Bodies Empowering Act, 1920. [11th February, 1922. BE IT ENACTED by the General Assembly of New Zealand in Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows :- Short Title and 1. This Act may be cited as the Waikato and King-country commencement. Counties Act, 1921-22, and shall come into operation on the :o/st day of April, nineteen hundred and twenty-two. Act deemed to be a 2. This Act shall be deemed to be a special Act within the special Act.
  • NZCA 680 BETWEEN NGĀTI TE ATA Appellant

    NZCA 680 BETWEEN NGĀTI TE ATA Appellant

    IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA547/2017 [2019] NZCA 680 BETWEEN NGĀTI TE ATA Appellant AND MINISTER FOR TREATY OF WAITANGI NEGOTIATIONS First Respondent HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Second Respondent NGĀTI TAMAOHO SETTLEMENT TRUST Third Respondent REGISTRAR-GENERAL OF LAND Fourth Respondent Hearing: 27 August 2019 (further submissions received 22 October 2019) Court: Clifford, Courtney and Wild JJ Counsel: J P Kahukiwa for Appellant S M Kinsler and T R Simpson for First and Second Respondents T T Kapea for Third Respondent No appearance for Fourth Respondent Judgment: 19 December 2019 at 4 pm JUDGMENT OF THE COURT A The appeal is dismissed. B The appellant is to pay one set of costs to the first and second respondents for a standard appeal on a band A basis and usual disbursements. ____________________________________________________________________ NGĀTI TE ATA v MINISTER FOR TREATY OF WAITANGI NEGOTIATIONS [2019] NZCA 680 [19 December 2019] REASONS OF THE COURT (Given by Clifford J) Introduction [1] For some years now, the Crown has been in the process of endeavouring to settle the historical Treaty claims of the iwi of Tāmaki Makaurau. That process has been controversial. In particular, a 2006 agreement in principle between the Crown and Ngāti Whātua Ōrākei was seen by other iwi as inimical to their interests and contrary to the Crown’s Treaty obligations to them. As part of resolving that controversy the Crown entered into a settlement deed with the group of iwi known as the Ngā Mana Whenua o Tāmaki Makaurau collective (the Collective).
  • Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment

    Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment

    Te Manaaki Taiao; Te Taiwhenua o Heretaunga Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki Catchment Final Report May 2012 Prepared for the Hawke’s Bay Regional Council 5/16/2012 Cultural Values and Uses of the Tukituki River Catchment by Heretaunga Marae/Hapu; Cultural Impact Assessment of the Ruataniwha Water Storage and Makaroro Dam Site Projects on Heretaunga Marae/Hapu Cultural Values and Uses. INDEX MIHI 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................... Page 3 2 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... Page 5 2.1 LOWER TUKITUKI RIVER: HERETAUNGA MARAE/ HAPŪ What, Why, Who, When 3 METHODOLOGY .................................................................... Page 6 3.1 CONSULTATION GUIDELINES Consultation Parameters Participants Report Constraints Report Scope Report Timeframe Results Format Context 4 RESULTS .................................................................................... Page 9 4.1 HERETAUNGA ARARAU ......................................................... Page 9 4.1.1 WHAKAPAPA 4.1.2 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK – WHAKAPAPA 4.2 HERETAUNGA HAUKUNUI ..................................................... Page16 4.2.1 WAI-AWA 4.2.2 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK - WAI-AWA 4.2.3 MAURI ............................................................................ Page 21 4.2.4 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK – MAURI 4.2.5 WĀHI TAPU ............................................................................ Page 25 4.2.6 MARAE/ HAPŪ FEEDBACK - WĀHI TAPU 4.3 TE HAARO O TE KAAHU ...................................................................
  • The Waikato-Tainui Settlement Act: a New High-Water Mark for Natural Resources Co-Management

    The Waikato-Tainui Settlement Act: a New High-Water Mark for Natural Resources Co-Management

    Notes & Comments The Waikato-Tainui Settlement Act: A New High-Water Mark for Natural Resources Co-management Jeremy Baker “[I]f we care for the River, the River will continue to sustain the people.” —The Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................. 165 II. THE EMERGENCE OF ADAPTIVE CO-MANAGEMENT ......................... 166 A. Co-management .................................................................... 166 B. Adaptive Management .......................................................... 168 C. Fusion: Adaptive Co-management ....................................... 169 D. Some Criticisms and Challenges Associated with Adaptive Co-management .................................................... 170 III. NEW ZEALAND’S WAIKATO-TAINUI SETTLEMENT ACT 2010—HISTORY AND BACKGROUND ...................................... 174 A. Maori Worldview and Environmental Ethics ....................... 175 B. British Colonization of Aotearoa New Zealand and Maori Interests in Natural Resources ............................ 176 C. The Waikato River and Its People ........................................ 182 D. The Waikato River Settlement Act 2010 .............................. 185 Jeremy Baker is a 2013 J.D. candidate at the University of Colorado Law School. 164 Colo. J. Int’l Envtl. L. & Pol’y [Vol. 24:1 IV. THE WAIKATO-TAINUI SETTLEMENT ACT AS ADAPTIVE CO-MANAGEMENT ..........................................................................
  • Historic Overview - Pokeno & District

    Historic Overview - Pokeno & District

    WDC District Plan Review – Built Heritage Assessment Historic Overview - Pokeno & District Pokeno The fertile valley floor in the vicinity of Pokeno has most likely been occupied by Maori since the earliest days of their settlement of Aotearoa. Pokeno is geographically close to the Tamaki isthmus, the lower Waikato River and the Hauraki Plains, all areas densely occupied by Maori in pre-European times. Traditionally, iwi of Waikato have claimed ownership of the area. Prior to and following 1840, that iwi was Ngati Tamaoho, including the hapu of Te Akitai and Te Uri-a-Tapa. The town’s name derives from the Maori village of Pokino located north of the present town centre, which ceased to exist on the eve of General Cameron’s invasion of the Waikato in July 1863. In the early 1820s the area was repeatedly swept by Nga Puhi war parties under Hongi Hika, the first of several forces to move through the area during the inter-tribal wars of the 1820s and 1830s. It is likely that the hapu of Pokeno joined Ngati Tamaoho war parties that travelled north to attack Nga Puhi and other tribes.1 In 1822 Hongi Hika and a force of around 3000 warriors, many armed with muskets, made an epic journey south from the Bay of Islands into the Waikato. The journey involved the portage of large war waka across the Tamaki isthmus and between the Waiuku River and the headwaters of the Awaroa and hence into the Waikato River west of Pokeno. It is likely warriors from the Pokeno area were among Waikato people who felled large trees across the Awaroa River to slow Hika’s progress.
  • Download Supplementary

    Download Supplementary

    1 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS FOR: 2 3 CASCADING IMPACTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE ON 4 INDIGENOUS CULTURE 5 6 Yletyinen, J., Tylianakis, J.M., Stone, C., Lyver, P.O.B. 7 8 9 10 SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS TABLE OF CONTENTS: 11 12 Table S1: Description of values 13 Table S2: Most frequent values and ecosystem elements in the interview coding 14 Table S3: Node degrees in the comprehensive social-ecological value system 15 Table S4: Sensitivity of values and biophysical elements to link weight thresholds 16 17 Figure S1: Ego networks for ecosystem elements with path length two 18 Figure S2: Mean path length distribution of 1000 randomized two-mode networks 19 20 1 21 Table S1. Value descriptions. Key primary and secondary values with descriptions applied to transcripts of interviews with Ngātiwai kaumātua 22 (elders), kaitiaki (environmental guardians) and representatives, Northland, New Zealand. This study examines the secondary values, which have 23 a finer resolution. Primary value set revised from 1 and 2. 24 1° values Abbreviations 2° Values Value descriptions for 2° Values 1. Connection PTA PEOPLE TO ANCESTORS • Whakapapa (genealogy) integral to relationship with ancestors and identity • Whakapapa connects individuals with their ancestors and defines their obligations and relationships to the wider family group and their localized species and environment • Waahi tapu (sacred) sites such as burial grounds known and protected by Ngātiwai • Occupation on the land and sea links the individual with ancestors PTP PEOPLE TO PEOPLE • Whakapapa and strengthening of relationships between whānau (family) and whānaunga (extended family) • Relationships and connections between whānau, hapū (sub- tribe) and Iwi (tribe) • Building community spirit and sense of togetherness • Islands facilitate the whānaungatanga (inter-relatedness) of whānau and community • Open and respectful communications • Ngātiwai networking with other Iwi • Ngātiwai networking with the Crown (NZ government) • Ngātiwai networking with non-government organisations (e.g.
  • Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison Expansion

    Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison Expansion

    Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison expansion Prepared by Te Onewa Consultants for Department of Corrections 6 March 2017 Prepared by Antoine Coffin, Consultant Te Onewa Consultants Limited Reference Coffin, Antoine. Cultural Impact Assessment of the Proposed Waikeria Prison expansion File name: Final Draft Waikeria Cultural Impact Assessment_v1.5_ 17032017 Address for service Boffa Miskell Ltd PO BOX 91 250 Level 3, IBM Centre 82 Wyndham Street Auckland Prepared for Boffa Miskell Ltd Ultimate client is the Department of Corrections Image front cover Waikeria Prison for WW1 objectors, c.1923 by Archives New Zealand Tokonui Blocks Copyright The right of Antoine Coffin to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright Act 1994. © Te Onewa Consultants Limited, 2016. Page 2 of 130 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 5 1.1 Proposal and Purpose .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Cultural Impact Assessments ........................................................................................................ 5 1.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................. 8 2.0 Statutory Context .......................................................................................................................
  • 2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15

    2031 Auckland/Waikato Fish & Game 15

    SPORTS FISH AND GAME MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH AND GAME REGION 2021 – 2031 AUCKLAND/WAIKATO FISH & GAME 156 BRYMER RD, RD 9, HAMILTON PH: 07 849 1666 [email protected] www.fishandgame.org.nz Contents: PART 1 BACKGROUND AND RESOURCE SUMMARY How To Use this Plan ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1. Operation of Plan .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2. Plan Review ............................................................................................................................. 5 1.3. Organisational management .................................................................................................. 5 2. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 6 2.1. Fish and Game New Zealand ................................................................................................... 6 2.2. The Auckland/Waikato Fish and Game ................................................................................... 6 3. Legal Context................................................................................................................................... 9 3.1. Conservation Act 1987 ............................................................................................................ 9 3.2. Wildlife Act 1953 ....................................................................................................................
  • 'Be(Com)Ing' Ngāti Kahungunu in the Diaspora: Iwi Identity and Social

    'Be(Com)Ing' Ngāti Kahungunu in the Diaspora: Iwi Identity and Social

    ‘Be(com)ing’ Ngāti Kahungunu in the Diaspora: Iwi Identity and Social Organisation in Wellington Christina M. González A thesis submitted in fulfilment of a Master of Arts (MA) in Māori Studies Victoria University of Wellington Te Whare Wānanga o te Upoko o te Ika a Māui 2010 Abstract Ngāti Kahungunu is an ideal example to investigate the processes of identity management and socio-political representation within and outside of their traditional tribal territory. It is the third most populous iwi in Aotearoa/New Zealand, with approximately 60,000 members, and boundaries that span from the Wairoa district down to the Wairarapa region. Kahungunu’s complexity and dynamism are not restricted to its territorial boundaries. A large portion of Kahungunu members form expatriate tribal communities located beyond their tribal district. The Wellington region hosts the largest number of Kahungunu members dwelling outside of their tribal territory, as well as the Ngāti Kahungunu Embassy. The Embassy is an organisation which, like many other expatriate Māori tribal bodies, faces the challenges of locating and reaching its tribal members to connect them to their Kahungunu home and heritage, while simultaneously representing their particular, Wellington-specific voices. This thesis explores the ways that Ngāti Kahungunu identities are articulated, maintained and transformed by individuals and institutions in Wellington today, by analysing qualitative interviews with ten Kahungunu men and women, and a case study on the Kahungunu Embassy. Three chapters on iwi identity, home and social organisation illustrate how Kahungunu voices in Wellington can more adequately be heard, and their experiences included, in the tribe, despite their apparent geographic and cultural distance.
  • Waikato Expressway, Tamahere–Cambridge Sections: Archaeological Monitoring and Investigations, 2013 and 2014 (HPA Authority 2013/855)

    Waikato Expressway, Tamahere–Cambridge Sections: Archaeological Monitoring and Investigations, 2013 and 2014 (HPA Authority 2013/855)

    Waikato Expressway, Tamahere–Cambridge Sections: archaeological monitoring and investigations, 2013 and 2014 (HPA authority 2013/855) report to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, The New Zealand Transport Agency and Opus International Consultants Matthew Campbell, Arden Cruickshank, Jaden Harris, Jacqueline Craig and Beatrice Hudson CFG Heritage Ltd. P.O. Box 10 015 Dominion Road Auckland 1024 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Waikato Expressway, Tamahere–Cambridge Sections: archaeological monitoring and investigations, 2013 and 2014 (HPA authority 2013/855) report to Heritage New Zealand Pouhere Taonga, The New Zealand Transport Agency and Opus International Consultants Prepared by: Matthew Campbell Reviewed by: Date: 16 July 2016 Danielle Trilford Reference: 13-0548 This report is made available by CFG Heritage Ltd under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/. CFG Heritage Ltd. P.O. Box 10 015 Dominion Road Auckland 1024 ph. (09) 309 2426 [email protected] Hard copy distribution New Zealand Historic Paces Trust, Tauranga Opus International Consultants New Zealand Transport Agency New Zealand Archaeological Association (file copy) CFG Heritage Ltd (file copy) University of Auckland General Library University of Otago Anthropology Department Ngati Koroki Kahukura Ngati Haua This report is provided electronically Please consider the environment before printing Waikato Expressway, Tamahere–Cambridge Sections: archaeological monitoring and investigations, 2013 and 2014 (HPA authority 2013/855) Matthew Campbell, Arden Cruickshank, Jaden Harris, Jacqueline Craig and Beatrice Hudson The New Zealand Transport Agency (NZTA) is constructing the Waikato Expressway, a four-lane highway from the top of the Bombay Hills to just south of Cambridge.
  • For Valour in the Waipa

    For Valour in the Waipa

    Captain Charles Heaphy, VC. Major John Carstairs McNeill, VC. included Heaphy, the Māori retreated Ōhaupo en route from Te Awamutu to FOR back to Waiari where they made a stand. Pukerimu. Just outside Ōhaupo, about where the Ōhaupo School is today, they In the ensuing engagement two British observed a Māori lying prone on the VALOUR IN soldiers were killed trying to rescue a track in front. THE WAIPA wounded corporal. Heaphy then went forward to dress the corporal’s wounds, Sensing a trap, McNeill sent Gibson when Māori fired a volley at him from Two men were awarded the Victoria back to Ōhaupo to bring up infantry. a distance of just a few feet. Five balls Cross for “conspicuous gallantry in the McNeill and Vosper then slowly went pierced his clothing and cap, wounding presence of the enemy” while serving in forward to observe the Māori from the him in three places. the Waipā during the Waikato War. top of the rise, but were immediately After dragging the corporal to safety fired on by about 50 Māori concealed in Captain Charles Heaphy of the Auckland with the help of another, Heaphy then bracken fern. Rifle Volunteers, a staff surveyor, was directed soldiers to where the Māori were awarded the Victoria Cross for bravery When they attempted to gallop from the and, despite his wounds, continued to during the engagement at Waiari, a scrub- scene, Vosper’s horse bolted, throwing attend to the injured for the remainder covered old pā site situated above the him to the ground. McNeill at once of the day.