DOCSLIB.ORG

Genetically Appropriate Choices for Plant Materials to Maintain Biological Diversity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Genetically Appropriate Choices for Plant Materials to Maintain Biological Diversity Deborah L. Rogers Arlee M. Montalvo Genetic Resources Conservation Program Department of Botany and Plant Sciences University of California and Center for Conservation Biology 1 Davis, CA University of California Riverside, CA and Riverside–Corona Resource Conservation District 2 Riverside, CA 1 Genetic Resources Conservation Program, University of California, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616. email: [email protected] 2 Riverside-Corona Resource Conservation District, 4500 Glenwood Drive, Riverside, CA 92501. email: [email protected] Prepared for: USDA Forest Service Rocky Mountain Region Lakewood, CO December 31, 2004 Citation: Rogers, D.L. and A.M. Montalvo. 2004. Genetically appropriate choices for plant materials to maintain biological diversity. University of California. Report to the USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Region, Lakewood, CO. Online: http://www.fs.fed.us/r2/publications/botany/plantgenetics.pdf Copyright © 2004 The Regents of the University of California The University of California prohibits discrimination or harassment of any person on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, pregnancy (including childbirth, and medical conditions related to pregnancy or childbirth), physical or mental disability, medical condition (cancer-related or genetic characteristics), ancestry, marital status, age, sexual orientation, citizenship, or status as a covered veteran (covered veterans are special disabled veterans, recently separated veterans, Vietnam era veterans, or any other veterans who served on active duty during a war or in a campaign or expedition for which a campaign badge has been authorized) in any of its programs or activities. University policy is intended to be consistent with the provisions of applicable State and Federal laws. Inquiries regarding the University’s nondiscrimination policies may be directed to the Affirmative Action/Staff Personnel Services Director, University of California, Agriculture and Natural Resources, 300 Lakeside Drive, 6th Floor, Oakland, CA 94612-3550, (510) 987-0096. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio-tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326 W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. ii Table of Contents vi Foreword vii Preface viii Acknowledgements 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 18 Chapter 2 Context for making genetically appropriate plant material choices on USDA Forest Service lands 32 Chapter 3 Genetic impacts of natural versus artificial regeneration 56 Chapter 4 Description of genetic diversity 77 Chapter 5 Genetic diversity and its relationship with evolution, ecology, and life history characteristics 103 Chapter 6 What is genetically local? 130 Chapter 7 Fitness consequences of poor genetic matching 151 Chapter 8 Purchased plant materials for wildland revegetation projects 197 Chapter 9 Choosing appropriate genetic sources 217 Chapter 10 Information on Region 2 native plants 310 Chapter 11 Demonstration of using the guidelines to choose appropriate genetic materials 316 Chapter 12 Concluding remarks 320 Glossary List of Boxes Page Number Title 12 1 The significance of in situ genetic reserves 15 2 Genetic policies: A sample from US agencies and organizations 25 3 USDA Forest Service Directives related to genetically appropriate use of native plants 28 4 Federal acts, presidential directives, and executive orders related to the use of native plants 44 5 The recurring question: To seed or not to seed 48 6 Ecological genetic considerations in species selection 53 7 Some ecological resources available for guiding species selection 145 8 Making the best use of limited and valuable genetic collections 148 9 Genetic monitoring for signs of genetic erosion or genetic shifts 191 10 Wildland seed certification programs 195 11 Conventions for classification and naming of native plant materials 209 12 Native plant species in FS Region 2 that are listed under the Federal or a State Endangered Species Act 211 13 Genetic considerations in restoring clonal species 214 14 Polyploidy in native plant species: implications for revegetation projects iii List of Figures Page Number Title 8 1.1 Elements of a natural area revegetation project 9 1.2 A representation of the four levels of biodiversity as viewed by the Forest Service and others 23 2.1 Examples of how the spatial scale of genetic diversity within a species may relate to the spatial scale of the revegetation project 120 6.1 Comparison of historic and revised southwestern ponderosa pine seed transfer rules for Colorado in Region 2 121 6.2 Example of species-specific seed zones for ponderosa pine (var. scopulorum) in Regions 1 and 2 122 6.3 USDA plant hardiness zones for central US showing range in average annual minimum temperature 123 6.4 Ecoregion maps for United States and South Dakota 124 6.5 Four of the possible fitness outcomes of population hybridization following mixing of a resident and genetically non-local population 141 7.1 The three subspecies of Artemisia tridentata in relation to the habitats to which they are adapted 185 8.1 AOSCA seed certification guidelines and nomenclature for release types in the genetically manipulated versus natural development tracks 205 9.1 Forest Service Seed Collection Zones for the State of Colorado 206 9.2 Forest Service Seed Collection Zones for the State of South Dakota 206 9.3 Forest Service Seed Collection Zones for the State of Wyoming 207 9.4 Basic steps for informing choices on genetically appropriate source for each species involved in a revegetation project 311 11.1 Rocky Mountain sedge (Carex scopulorum) 313 11.2 Poverty oat grass (Danthonia spicata) 314 11.3 Scarlet globemallow (Sphaeralcea coccinea) List of Tables* Page Number Title 10 1.1 Some basic differences between plants and animals in some genetic characteristics 24 2.1 Spatial and temporal scales relevant to plant introductions in revegetation projects 40 3.1 A classification for plant growth following a disturbance 41 3.2 Risks and opportunities associated with natural (or unassisted) regeneration and assisted regeneration of native plant species on sites where fires or harvests have occurred iv List of Tables continued* Page Number Title 73 4.1 Summary of common statistical measures of genetic diversity within and among populations 74 4.2 Some values for allozyme diversity for western conifer species 93 5.1 Contrasts and comparisons among various DNA markers that can be useful in genetic monitoring 95 5.2 Groups of species in the Great Plains and Intermountain West floras with high frequencies of hybridization and no reported hybridization 95 5.3 Evidence of cytoplasmic (cpDNA) genomic capture in plant species. 96 5.4 Correlates between life-history traits and spatial genetic structure (differences among populations) in plant species. 96 5.5 Average levels of among-population genetic differentiation (spatial genetic structure) for several plant families 97 5.6 Effect of life-history characteristics of plant species on the ‘Sp statistic’ measuring spatial genetic structure (SGS) 147 B8.1 Spectrum of value to be applied to research projects that requests use of limited collection of plant genetic resources 167 8.1 Specifications for the different classes of native plant germplasm made available for release by USDA Plant Materials Centers 168 8.2 Information about releases of plants native to Region 2 182 8.3 Example of conservation plant releases from USDA NRCS Manhattan Plant Materials Center, KS 183 8.4 Example of procedures that could minimize genetic bottlenecks and unintended genetic shifts in native plant collections and releases 184 8.5 Questions relating to commercial plant materials 209 B12.1 Native plant species in FS Region 2 that are listed (or Candidates for Listing) under the Federal or a State Endangered Species Act 220 10.1 General species life-history information for a sample of species from Region 2 that have some genetic information available 245 10.2 Characteristics of some Region 2 native plant species that are known to reproduce vegetatively or re-sprout after disturbance 250 10.3 Information on local adaptation or genetic differentiation in a sample of plant species native to at least one of the five states in Forest Service Region 2 267 10.4 Region 2 native plant species that have variable ploidy levels (cytotypes) 274 10.5 Species from Region 2 studied for inbreeding or outbreeding effects 282 10.6 Ecological genetic details for Populus tremuloides 285 10.7 Ecological genetic details for Linum lewisii 287 10.8 Ecological genetic details for Bouteloua gracilis * ‘B’ in the table number indicates that this table is associated with the box of that number, rather than the chapter. v Foreword Native plant material use in revegetation or restoration efforts has increased nationally over the past couple of decades, replacing to some
Recommended publications

  • Government Open Systems Interconnection Profile Users' Guide, Version 2

    NIST Special Publication 500-192 [ Computer Systems Government Open Systems Technology Interconnection Profile Users' U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Institute of Guide, Version 2 Standards and Technology Tim Boland Nisr NATL INST. OF STAND & TECH R.I.C, A111D3 71D7S1 NIST PUBLICATIONS --QC- 100 .U57 500-192 1991 C.2 NIST Special Publication 500-192 . 0)0 Government Open Systems Interconnection Profile Users' Guide, Version 2 Tim Boland Computer Systems Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899 Supersedes NIST Special Publication 500-163 October 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Robert A. Mosbacher, Secretary NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY John W. Lyons, Director Reports on Computer Systems Technology The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has a unique responsibility for conriputer systems technology within the Federal government. NIST's Computer Systems Laboratory (CSL) devel- ops standards and guidelines, provides technical assistance, and conducts research for computers and related telecommunications systems to achieve more effective utilization of Federal information technol- ogy resources. CSL's responsibilities include development of technical, management, physical, and ad- ministrative standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information processed in Federal computers. CSL assists agencies in developing security plans and in improving computer security awareness training. This Special Publication 500 series reports CSL re- search and guidelines to Federal agencies as well as to organizations in industry, government, and academia. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 500-192 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 500-192, 166 pages (Oct. 1991) CODEN: NSPUE2 U.S.
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."

    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
  • Tomo Kahni State Historic Park Tour Notes – Flora

    Tomo Kahni State Historic Park Tour Notes – Flora

    Tomo Kahni State Historic Park Tour Notes – Flora Version 3.0 April 2019 Compiled by: Georgette Theotig Cynthia Waldman Tech Support: Jeanne Hamrick Plant List by Color - 1 Page Common Name Genus/Species Family Kawaisuu Name White Flowers 6 White Fiesta Flower Pholistoma membranaceum Borage (Boraginaceae) kaawanavi 6 Seaside Heliotrope Heliotropium curassavicum Borage (Boraginaceae) 6 California Manroot Marah fabacea Cucumber (Cucurbitaceae) parivibi 7 Stinging Nettles Urtica dioica Goosefoot (Urticaceae) kwichizi ataa (Bad Plate) 7 White Whorl Lupine Lupinus microcarpus var. densiflorus Legume/Pea (Fabaceae) 7 Mariposa Lily (white) Calochortus venustus Lily (Liliaceae) 7 Mariposa Lily (pinkish-white) Calochortus invenustus Lily (Liliaceae) 8 Wild Tobacco Nicotiana quadrivalvis Nightshade (Solanaceae) Soo n di 8 Wild Celery Apium graveolens Parsley (Umbelliferae) n/a Bigelow’s Linanthus Linanthus bigelovii Phlox (Polemoniaceae) 8 Linanthus Phlox Phlox (Polemoniaceae) 8 Evening Snow Linanthus dichotomus Phlox (Polemoniaceae) tutuvinivi 9 Miner’s Lettuce Claytonia perfoliata Miner’s Lettuce (Montiaceae) Uutuk a ribi 9 Thyme-leaf Spurge (aka Thyme-leaf Sandmat) Euphorbia serpyllifolia Spurge (Euphorbiaceae) tivi kagivi 9 Pale Yellow Layia Layia heterotricha Sunflower (Asteraceae) 9 Tidy Tips Layia glandulosa Sunflower (Asteraceae) April 8, 2019 Tomo Kahni Flora – Tour Notes Page 1 Plant List by Color – 2 Page Common Name Genus/Species Family Kawaisuu Name Yellow Flowers 10 Fiddleneck Amsinckia tessellata Borage (Boraginaceae) tiva nibi 10
  • Patellariaceae Revisited

    Patellariaceae Revisited

    Mycosphere 6 (3): 290–326(2015) ISSN 2077 7019 www.mycosphere.org Article Mycosphere Copyright © 2015 Online Edition Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/6/3/7 Patellariaceae revisited Yacharoen S1,2, Tian Q1,2, Chomnunti P1,2, Boonmee S1, Chukeatirote E2, Bhat JD3 and Hyde KD1,2,4,5* 1Institute of Excellence in Fungal Research, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 2School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, 57100, Thailand 3Formerly at Department of Botany, Goa University, Goa 403 206, India 4Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China 5World Agroforestry Centre, East and Central Asia, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China Yacharoen S, Tian Q, Chomnunti P, Boonmee S, Chukeatirote E, Bhat JD, Hyde KD 2015 – Patellariaceae revisited. Mycosphere 6(3), 290–326, Doi 10.5943/mycosphere/6/3/7 Abstract The Dothideomycetes include several genera whose ascomata can be considered as apothecia and thus would be grouped as discomycetes. Most genera are grouped in the family Patellariaceae, but also Agrynnaceae and other families. The Hysteriales include genera having hysterioid ascomata and can be confused with species in Patellariaceae with discoid apothecia if the opening is wide enough. In this study, genera of the family Patellariaceae were re-examined and characterized based on morphological examination. As a result of this study the genera Baggea, Endotryblidium, Holmiella, Hysteropatella, Lecanidiella, Lirellodisca, Murangium, Patellaria, Poetschia, Rhizodiscina, Schrakia, Stratisporella and Tryblidaria are retained in the family Patellariaceae. The genera Banhegyia, Pseudoparodia and Rhytidhysteron are excluded because of differing morphology and/or molecular data.
  • Propagation of Colorado Natives at Little Valley©

    Propagation of Colorado Natives at Little Valley©

    224 Combined Proceedings International Plant Propagators’ Society, Volume 58, 2008 Propagation of Colorado Natives at Little Valley © Brian Core Little Valley Wholesale Nursery, 13022 E. 136th Ave., Brighton, Colorado 80601 U.S.A. Email: [email protected] INTRODUCTION Little Valley Wholesale Nursery was established in 1979 with 15 acres of field and container stock and a staff of four people. Over the years, it has expanded to en- compass 141 acres and a peak-season staff of more than 150 people. The plant palette now includes more than 500 taxa of perennials, 275 taxa of shrubs, and over 130 taxa of trees. The area served by Little Valley’s distribution system includes Wyoming, Colorado, New Mexico, and Arizona. Little Valley’s motto “The Rocky Mountain Standard” expresses the commitment to be the best wholesale plant dis- tributor in the western region. Native plants have been an important part of Little Valley’s plant mix for many years. Native plants are ideal for low-input sustainable landscapes. The Denver Metro area receives 8–15 inches of rain per year; in contrast, many eastern cities receive 50 or even 60 inches of annual precipitation. Colorado has a rapidly expanding population that threatens to deplete the water supply within a few decades. Many native plants require no supplemental water when established in the landscape; water that is not wasted on bluegrass lawns is water that can be used for human consumption. Native plants also require less frequent fertilizer and pesticide appli- cations; overuse of fertilizer and pesticide can lead to contamination of groundwater supplies with carcinogens.
  • Evitalia NORMAS ISO En El Marco De La Complejidad

    Evitalia NORMAS ISO En El Marco De La Complejidad

    No. 7 Revitalia NORMAS ISO en el marco de la complejidad ESTEQUIOMETRIA de las relaciones humanas FRACTALIDAD en los sistemas biológicos Dirección postal Calle 82 # 102 - 79 Bogotá - Colombia Revista Revitalia Publicación trimestral Contacto [email protected] Web http://revitalia.biogestion.com.co Volumen 2 / Número 7 / Noviembre-Enero de 2021 ISSN: 2711-4635 Editor líder: Juan Pablo Ramírez Galvis. Consultor en Biogestión, NBIC y Gerencia Ambiental/de la Calidad. Globuss Biogestión [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-1947-5589 Par evaluador: Jhon Eyber Pazos Alonso Experto en nanotecnología, biosensores y caracterización por AFM. Universidad Central / Clúster NBIC [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-5608-1597 Contenido en este número Editorial p. 3 Estequiometría de las relaciones humanas pp. 5-13 Catálogo de las normas ISO en el marco de la complejidad pp. 15-28 Fractalidad en los sistemas biológicos pp. 30-37 Licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 2 Editorial: “En armonía con lo ancestral” Juan Pablo Ramírez Galvis. Consultor en Biogestión, NBIC y Gerencia Ambiental/de la Calidad. [email protected] ORCID: 0000-0002-1947-5589 La dicotomía entre ciencia y religión proviene de la edad media, en la cual, los aspectos espirituales no podían explicarse desde el método científico, y a su vez, la matematización mecánica del universo era el único argumento que convencía a los investigadores. Sin embargo, más atrás en la línea del tiempo, los egipcios, sumerios, chinos, etc., unificaban las teorías metafísicas con las ciencias básicas para dar cuenta de los fenómenos en todas las escalas desde lo micro hasta lo macro.
  • Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 159/Wednesday, August 17, 2011/Proposed Rules

    Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 159/Wednesday, August 17, 2011/Proposed Rules

    Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 159 / Wednesday, August 17, 2011 / Proposed Rules 50971 4. Verification of Consumer Eligibility Federal Communications Commission. ADDRESSES: You may submit for Lifeline—Sampling Methodology Trent Harkrader, information by one of the following Division Chief, Wireline Competition Bureau. methods: In the 2011 Lifeline and Link Up [FR Doc. 2011–20847 Filed 8–16–11; 8:45 am] (1) Electronically: Go to the Federal NPRM, the Commission proposed to eRulemaking Portal: http:// BILLING CODE 6712–01–P amend § 54.410 of its rules to establish www.regulations.gov. In the Keyword a uniform methodology for conducting box, enter Docket No. [FWS–R8–ES– verification sampling that would apply 2011–0055], which is the docket to all ETCs in all states. The NPRM also DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR number for this action. Then, in the asked commenters to consider two Search panel on the left side of the proposals for modifying the existing Fish and Wildlife Service screen, under the Document Type sampling methodology to more heading, click on the Proposed Rules effectively balance the need for an 50 CFR Part 17 link to locate this document. You may administratively feasible sampling submit a comment by clicking on ‘‘Send methodology with the Commission’s [Docket No. FWS–R8–ES–2011–0055; MO a Comment or Submission.’’ 92210–0–0008] (2) By hard copy: Submit by U.S. mail obligation to ensure that ineligible or hand-deliver to: Public Comments consumers do not receive Lifeline/Link Endangered and Threatened Wildlife Processing, Attn: FWS–R8–ES–2011– Up benefits. We invite additional and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a 0055; Division of Policy and Directives comment on this issue.
  • Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area

    Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area

    Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area • Giuseppe Venturella Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Edited by Giuseppe Venturella Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Diversity www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Editor Giuseppe Venturella MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade • Manchester • Tokyo • Cluj • Tianjin Editor Giuseppe Venturella University of Palermo Italy Editorial Office MDPI St. Alban-Anlage 66 4052 Basel, Switzerland This is a reprint of articles from the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Diversity (ISSN 1424-2818) (available at: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity/special issues/ fungal diversity). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: LastName, A.A.; LastName, B.B.; LastName, C.C. Article Title. Journal Name Year, Article Number, Page Range. ISBN 978-3-03936-978-2 (Hbk) ISBN 978-3-03936-979-9 (PDF) c 2020 by the authors. Articles in this book are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license, which allows users to download, copy and build upon published articles, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maximum dissemination and a wider impact of our publications. The book as a whole is distributed by MDPI under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND. Contents About the Editor .............................................. vii Giuseppe Venturella Fungal Diversity in the Mediterranean Area Reprinted from: Diversity 2020, 12, 253, doi:10.3390/d12060253 .................... 1 Elias Polemis, Vassiliki Fryssouli, Vassileios Daskalopoulos and Georgios I.
  • An Ethnobotany of Mount Rushmore National Memorial

    An Ethnobotany of Mount Rushmore National Memorial

    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Masters Projects Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Summer 2019 An Ethnobotany of Mount Rushmore National Memorial Meredith Savage University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_ms_projects Part of the Landscape Architecture Commons Savage, Meredith, "An Ethnobotany of Mount Rushmore National Memorial" (2019). Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Masters Projects. 92. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.umass.edu/larp_ms_projects/92 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Landscape Architecture & Regional Planning Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AN ETHNOBOTANY OF MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning University of Massachusetts Amherst Master of Regional Planning Project Meredith S. Savage July 2019 © Copyright by Meredith S. Savage 2019 All Rights Reserved AN ETHNOBOTANY OF MOUNT RUSHMORE NATIONAL MEMORIAL Department of Landscape Architecture and Regional Planning University of Massachusetts Amherst Master of Regional Planning Project Meredith S. Savage July 2019 Approved as to style and content by: __________________________________________ Dr. Elizabeth Brabec,
  • Pseudodiplodia Cenangiicola Sp. Nov., a Fungus on Cenangium Ferruginosum

    Pseudodiplodia Cenangiicola Sp. Nov., a Fungus on Cenangium Ferruginosum

    Karsienia i9: 30-Ji. 1979 Pseudodiplodia cenangiicola sp. nov., a fungus on Cenangium ferruginosum D.W. MINTER MINTER, D.W. 1979: Pseudodiplodia cenangiicola sp. nov., a fungus on Cenangium ferruginosum. - Karstenia 19: 30- 31. A new coelomycete, Pseudodiplodia cenangiicola Nevodovsky ex Minter, on ascocarps of Cenangium ferruginosum Fr. ex Fr. (a fungus inhabiting pine twigs) is described from Krasnoyarsk, Siberia. D. W. Minter, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Ferry Lane, Kew, Surrey, England Cenangium ferruginosum Fr. ex Fr. (Ascomycetes, Botanical Nomenclature relevant. This states that Helotiales) is a common saprophyte on twigs of 'the distribution on or after 1 Jan. 1953 of printed pines. Collections in the herbaria of the Royal matter accompanying exsiccata does not constitute Botanic Gardens, Kew (K) and the Commonwealth effective publication', with the proviso that 'if the Mycological Institute, Kew (IMI) were recently printed matter is also distributed independently of the examined and two specimens of an unusual collection exsiccata, this constitutes effective publication'. from Krasnoyarsk (Siberia, U.S.S.R.) in October Unless the terms of the proviso were met, therefore, 1950 were discovered. They were labelled as Microdiplodia cenangiicola was not effectively, and Cenangium abietis (Pers.) Rehm (a synonym of C. hence not validly published. Examination of corre­ ferruginosum), and formed no. 29 of the second spondence files at C.M.I. revealed that in 1956 an fascicle of the exsiccata 'Griby SSSR', published in enquiry was made concerning the validity of other Moscow in 1954. On the label was included a Latin names published in the first fascicle of this series of description of a new species, Microdiplodia exsiccata.
  • Official Report Will Confirm Tomorrow— Support

    Official Report Will Confirm Tomorrow— Support

    MEETING OF THE PARLIAMENT Thursday 30 June 2005 Session 2 £5.00 Parliamentary copyright. Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body 2005. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to the Licensing Division, Her Majesty‘s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ Fax 01603 723000, which is administering the copyright on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. Produced and published in Scotland on behalf of the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body by Astron. CONTENTS Thursday 30 June 2005 Debates Col. BUSINESS MOTION ........................................................................................................................................ 18571 Motion moved—[George Lyon]—and agreed to. George Lyon (Argyll and Bute) (LD) ........................................................................................................ 18571 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (CROSS-CUTTING EXPENDITURE REVIEW) ............................................................. 18572 Motion moved—[Des McNulty]. Des McNulty (Clydebank and Milngavie) (Lab) ....................................................................................... 18572 Jim Mather (Highlands and Islands) (SNP) ............................................................................................. 18576 Mr Ted Brocklebank (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) ................................................................................ 18578 Mr Andrew Arbuckle (Mid Scotland and Fife) (LD) .................................................................................
  • 3.8 Special Status Wildlife Species 3.8.1 Regulatory Background Special

    3.8 Special Status Wildlife Species 3.8.1 Regulatory Background Special

    TransWest Express EIS Section 3.8 – Special Status Wildlife Species 3.8-1 3.8 Special Status Wildlife Species 3.8.1 Regulatory Background Special status species are those species for which state or federal agencies afford an additional level of protection by law, regulation, or policy. Included in this category are federally listed species that are protected under the ESA and species designated as sensitive by the BLM and USFS. In addition, there are state-protected and sensitive wildlife lists for Colorado, Utah, and Nevada (Colorado Revised Statutes 33-2-105, Utah Rules R657-3, R657-19, R657-48, and NAC 503.0001-503.104) that include many of the BLM and USFS sensitive species as well as ESA-listed species. In accordance with the ESA, the lead agencies (BLM and Western), USFS, and NPS, in coordination with the USFWS, must ensure that any action that they authorize, fund, or carry out is not likely to jeopardize a federally listed species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat. In addition, as stated in the BLM’s Special Status Species Management Policy 6840 (6840 Policy) (Rel. 6-125), it is BLM policy “to conserve and/or recover ESA-listed species and the ecosystems on which they depend so that ESA provisions are no longer needed for these species, and to initiate proactive conservation measures that reduce or eliminate threats to BLM sensitive species to minimize the likelihood of and need for listing of these species under the ESA.” The FSM 2670 states “Sensitive species of native plant and animal species must receive special management emphasis to ensure their viability and to preclude trends toward endangerment that would result in the need for Federal listing.” The NPS is responsible for management of wildlife species on NPS-managed lands (NPS 2006).