sustainability Article Does Circular Reuse of Chickpea Cooking Water to Produce Vegan Mayonnaise Reduce Environmental Impact Compared with Egg Mayonnaise? Sophie Saget 1,* , Marcela Costa 2, David Styles 2,3 and Mike Williams 1 1 Department of Botany, School of Natural Sciences, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, D02 PN40 Dublin, Ireland;
[email protected] 2 School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2DG, UK;
[email protected] (M.C.);
[email protected] (D.S.) 3 Bernal Institute, School of Engineering, University of Limerick, V94 T9PX Limerick, Ireland * Correspondence:
[email protected] Abstract: Consumers are increasingly asking for foods that are healthier, more humane, and envi- ronmentally sustainable. Recently, chickpea cooking water—aquafaba—has gained popularity as a potential egg substitute that complies with these criteria. However, research on the environmental impact of this ingredient is lacking. We performed a comparative attributional life cycle assessment (LCA) of mayonnaise made with aquafaba as the emulsifying agent, and traditional mayonnaise made with egg yolk. The vegan mayonnaise was found not to be as environmentally sustainable as the egg-based product. The vegan mayonnaise had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower impact across 4 categories, but a significantly higher impact across 8 categories out of 16, including climate change and resource-use-energy-carriers. The majority of categories under which vegan mayonnaise un- Citation: Saget, S.; Costa, M.; Styles, derperformed were related to the electricity needed for aquafaba processing. These impacts can be D.; Williams, M. Does Circular Reuse mitigated with a “cleaner” electricity grid, or onsite renewable electricity generation.