Reconsidering Goliath: an Iron Age I Philistine Chariot Warrior Author(S): Jeffrey R

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reconsidering Goliath: an Iron Age I Philistine Chariot Warrior Author(S): Jeffrey R Reconsidering Goliath: An Iron Age I Philistine Chariot Warrior Author(s): Jeffrey R. Zorn Source: Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research , November 2010, No. 360 (November 2010), pp. 1-22 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The American Schools of Oriental Research Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/41104416 JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at https://about.jstor.org/terms The American Schools of Oriental Research and The University of Chicago Press are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research This content downloaded from 132.174.252.179 on Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:15:39 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms Reconsidering Goliath: An Iron Age I Philistine Chariot Warrior Jeffrey R. Zorn Department of Near Eastern Studies 409 White Hall Cornell University Ithaca, NY 14853 [email protected] The text of 1 Sam 17:4-7 gives a detailed account of the arms and armor of the Philistine champion who battled David in the Elah Valley, a description unmatched for detail in any other biblical text. The text seems to contain enough information to provide an approximate sense of Goliath* s appearance. However, this is where the heart of the debate lies. Previous approaches have viewed the description of Goliath as modeled on an infantry man, be it a Mycenaean warrior of the Iron Age I, a Greek hoplite of the sixth century, or something of a mix of the two. However, if he is understood as a chariot warrior, a member of the Philistine elite warrior class, there is nothing in the descrip- tion of his equipment that demands a late date for the text's origin. In fact, all his gear matches well with what might be expected of an Aegean-Levantine chariot warrior of the Iron I period. INTRODUCTION the question remains whether these late editors were aware of and relied upon earlier traditions, including recent years several scholars have those revisited of Philistine the weaponry and armor, or whether issues surrounding the description ofGoliath's the weapons kit is a priori a late fabrication, if anything and armor of the Philistine warrior who reflecting fought the equipment of Greek mercenaries of the famous duel with a youthful David in erathe ofElah the Val- editors. After all, Homer recalls authentic ley (1 Sam 17:4-7). Some, such as Finkelstein touches of (2002: a Myceanean military kit when he describes 142-48) and A. Yadin (2004: 375-76), boar'sfavor tuskin one helmets, tower shields, etc. (Lorimer 1950: way or another the approach laid out by 132-306), Galling (1966:showing that a writer working centuries 150-69), according to which the description after the of events this he describes can preserve at least some gear was fabricated by late Deuteronomistic memories editors of the distant past. Given the flurry of recent and has little, if anything, to do with thestudies material on this cul- topic, a legitimate question is whether tural realities of the Iron I period.1 Others, another such review as of the subject is warranted. While vari- Millard (2009: 337-43), Garsiel (2009: ous 404-9), scholars King have contributed many valuable insights (2007: 350-57), Stager (1998: 169; 2006a: on this 381), subject King over the years, the contention advanced and Stager (2001: 228), and Dothan (1982: here is20), that argue a fundamental misunderstanding has always that Y. Yadin's (1963: 265-67, 354-55) understanding been made in the approach to this passage. Because is essentially correct, and that the description the duel oftook the place on foot, scholars have assumed, Philistine's gear corresponds to that of without a late Myce-comment, that the Philistine described was an naean or Sea Peoples soldier from the infantryend of the man, Late or foot soldier. However, it is the very Bronze Age/Iron I period. While not doubting combination the late of weapons and armor with which he was editing of the biblical text, or that the equipped editor's knowl-- and which to some have seemed a cultural edge of earlier times might be imperfect hodge-podge, or limited, suggesting a completely non-historical character - that are actually the key to understanding the nature of this figure. If, instead, one sees Goliath 1 Ca. 1200-980 b.c. by the Modified Conventional Chronology (Mazar 2005: 16, table 2.1) or 1200-920 b.c. by asthe a Lowchariot Chronol- warrior, most, if not all, of the problems ogy (Mazar 2005: 23). associated with an early dating for the description 1 This content downloaded from 132.174.252.179 on Thu, 24 Jun 2021 22:15:39 UTC All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms 2 JEFFREY R. ZORN BASOR 360 of his gear disappear; repertoire (Finkelstein 2002: he 145-46; fitsMillard 2009: very well into an Iron Age I material 338-39). culture To be added to this list context. of incongruous ele- Indeed, it is just dur- ing the era of ments Saul is the giant's and probable bronze David sickle sword, a that Philistine chariots are attested in the Bible and in the material culture weapon of the second millennium. As will be clear record. For example, chariot fittings themselves fromare the following discussion, these three elements attested from the Philistine sites of Ashkelon (Stager are part of the heritage of the ancient Near East. If 2006b) and Ekron (Dothan 1993; Dothan and Drenka the description of the giant is supposed to faithfully 2009). According to the biblical text, in the Philistine depict a Greek warrior of the editor's era, this mix- invasion of the central hill country leading up to ing the of Greek and non-Greek elements is odd. On the battle in the Michmash Pass, the Philistines are said other to hand, the preponderance of bronze among the have mustered 30,000 chariots (1 Sam 13:5; or 3,000: Philistine's weapons and armor, save for the massive McCarter 1980: 224-25)! Similarly, Philistine chari- iron spearhead, is not a weighty argument against see- ots are found at Saul's final battle at Mt. Gilboa (2 ing Sam him as based on a type of Greek hoplite from the 1 :6). Even if the first set of numbers is exaggerated, editor's it era (contra Millard 2009: 341). Greek hoplite seems likely that Philistine armies routinely included gear from 700 b.c. and later was mostly bronze (Snod- chariots, and if so, their crews would be among grassthe 1957: 38, 42-43), except for the iron spearhead elite troops of the army. (Snodgrass 1957: 50-53, 57; Hanson 2000: 71-84). This study will not deal with the literary devel- However, the emphasis placed by the author on the opment of the story, or with the complexities of bronze its composition of certain pieces of equipment is literary transmission, or how it functions in the over-significant and may suggest an early date (see below). all narrative.2 Nor will the historical parallels for the Before going on to a case-by-case analysis of the contest of champions, often discussed in this context, military equipment listed in 1 Samuel 17, it is next be examined. The focus here is only on the narrower necessary to survey the obstacles facing scholars who topic involving military equipment and terminology would clarify this subject. This will eliminate certain and how it illuminates the nature of the Philistine theories and objections at the start. First and foremost, champion. it must be stated that there are no late 1 1 th-century Goliath is, of course, first a literary character b.c. por- sources that document the appearance of Philis- trayed in epic fashion. He is unknown from contem- tine warriors that would be contemporary with the porary sources outside of the Bible, itself a work biblical of Goliath. This is a crucial point. Those who literature. It is unknown how many stories about argue him against an Iron Age I context for this gear note may have been transmitted in Israelite and Philistine that the 1 Samuel 17 descriptions do not match the ap- circles, or even if he actually existed. For this article, pearance of the Sea Peoples warriors depicted in the this issue is not important. The aim is to ascertain mortuary how temple of Ramesses III at Medinet Habu ca. the storytellers and writers who transmitted this 1175 tale b.c. (A. Yadin 2004: 375-76; Finkelstein 2002: through the centuries, and the audiences who heard 142-43; Rofé 1987: 132). This, however, is something or read it, envisioned this Philistine champion, ofreal a red herring. It is well known that the material cul- or not. ture of the Philistines evolved in the period after their It is important, then, to note that efforts to see arrivalthe in south coastal Canaan (Stager 1995: 334-35; descriptions of Goliath's gear as reflecting some sortDothan 1982: 95-96). Ceramics offer the clearest ex- of mercenary Greek hoplite (Finkelstein 2002: ample143) of this. The initial form of Philistine pottery or retrojection of a Hellenized "Philistine" culture is now known as Philistine Monochrome (formerly of the sixth century and later into the past (A.
Recommended publications
  • Linguistics Development Team
    Development Team Principal Investigator: Prof. Pramod Pandey Centre for Linguistics / SLL&CS Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi Email: [email protected] Paper Coordinator: Prof. K. S. Nagaraja Department of Linguistics, Deccan College Post-Graduate Research Institute, Pune- 411006, [email protected] Content Writer: Prof. K. S. Nagaraja Prof H. S. Ananthanarayana Content Reviewer: Retd Prof, Department of Linguistics Osmania University, Hyderabad 500007 Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Indo-Aryan Language Family Description of Module Subject Name Linguistics Paper Name Historical and Comparative Linguistics Module Title Indo-Aryan Language Family Module ID Lings_P7_M1 Quadrant 1 E-Text Paper : Historical and Comparative Linguistics Linguistics Module : Indo-Aryan Language Family INDO-ARYAN LANGUAGE FAMILY The Indo-Aryan migration theory proposes that the Indo-Aryans migrated from the Central Asian steppes into South Asia during the early part of the 2nd millennium BCE, bringing with them the Indo-Aryan languages. Migration by an Indo-European people was first hypothesized in the late 18th century, following the discovery of the Indo-European language family, when similarities between Western and Indian languages had been noted. Given these similarities, a single source or origin was proposed, which was diffused by migrations from some original homeland. This linguistic argument is supported by archaeological and anthropological research. Genetic research reveals that those migrations form part of a complex genetical puzzle on the origin and spread of the various components of the Indian population. Literary research reveals similarities between various, geographically distinct, Indo-Aryan historical cultures. The Indo-Aryan migrations started in approximately 1800 BCE, after the invention of the war chariot, and also brought Indo-Aryan languages into the Levant and possibly Inner Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Marvel Universe 3.75" Action Figure Checklist
    Marvel Universe 3.75" Action Figure Checklist Series 1 - Fury Files Wave 1 • 001 - Iron Man (Modern Armor) • 002 - Spider-Man (red/blue costume) (Light Paint Variant) • 002 - Spider-Man (red/blue costume) (Dark Paint Variant) • 003 - Silver Surfer • 004 - Punisher • 005 - Black Panther • 006 - Wolverine (X-Force costume) • 007 - Human Torch (Flamed On) • 008 - Daredevil (Light Red Variant) • 008 - Daredevil (Dark Red Variant) • 009 - Iron Man (Stealth Ops) • 010 - Bullseye (Light Paint Variant) • 010 - Bullseye (Dark Paint Variant) • 011 - Human Torch (Light Blue Costume) • 011 - Human Torch (Dark Blue Costume) Wave 2 • 012 - Captain America (Ultimates) • 013 - Hulk (Green) • 014 - Hulk (Grey) • 015 - Green Goblin • 016 - Ronin • 017 - Iron Fist (Yellow Dragon) • 017 - Iron Fist (Black Dragon Variant) Wave 3 • 018 - Black Costume Spider-Man • 019 - The Thing (Light Pants) • 019 - The Thing (Dark Pants) • 020 - Punisher (Modern Costume & New Head Sculpt) • 021 - Iron Man (Classic Armor) • 022 - Ms. Marvel (Modern Costume) • 023 - Ms. Marvel (Classic Red, Carol Danvers) • 023 - Ms. Marvel (Classic Red, Karla Sofen) • 024 - Hand Ninja (Red) Wave 4 • 026 - Union Jack • 027 - Moon Knight • 028 - Red Hulk • 029 - Blade • 030 - Hobgoblin Wave 5 • 025 - Electro • 031 - Guardian • 032 - Spider-man (Red and Blue, right side up) • 032 - Spider-man (Black and Red, upside down Variant) • 033 - Iron man (Red/Silver Centurion) • 034 - Sub-Mariner (Modern) Series 2 - HAMMER Files Wave 6 • 001 - Spider-Man (House of M) • 002 - Wolverine (Xavier School)
    [Show full text]
  • Moses -- Exodus 2:1-10 David and Goliath (I Samuel 17:1-58)
    Moses -- Exodus 2:1-10 Exodus 2:1-10 New International Version (NIV) The Birth of Moses 2 Now a man of the tribe of Levi married a Levite woman, 2 and she became pregnant and gave birth to a son. When she saw that he was a fine child, she hid him for three months. 3 But when she could hide him no longer, she got a papyrus basket[a] for him and coated it with tar and pitch. Then she placed the child in it and put it among the reeds along the bank of the Nile. 4 His sister stood at a distance to see what would happen to him. 5 Then Pharaoh’s daughter went down to the Nile to bathe, and her attendants were walking along the riverbank. She saw the basket among the reeds and sent her female slave to get it. 6 She opened it and saw the baby. He was crying, and she felt sorry for him. “This is one of the Hebrew babies,” she said. 7 Then his sister asked Pharaoh’s daughter, “Shall I go and get one of the Hebrew women to nurse the baby for you?” 8 “Yes, go,” she answered. So the girl went and got the baby’s mother. 9 Pharaoh’s daughter said to her, “Take this baby and nurse him for me, and I will pay you.” So the woman took the baby and nursed him. 10 When the child grew older, she took him to Pharaoh’s daughter and he became her son.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East C. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(S): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol
    The Emergence of the Light, Horse-Drawn Chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C. Author(s): P. R. S. Moorey Source: World Archaeology, Vol. 18, No. 2, Weaponry and Warfare (Oct., 1986), pp. 196-215 Published by: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/124615 Accessed: 06-11-2015 06:35 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Taylor & Francis, Ltd. is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to World Archaeology. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 141.211.4.224 on Fri, 06 Nov 2015 06:35:53 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Tlhe emergence of the light, horse-drawn chariot in the Near-East c. 2000-1500 B.C.* The recent appearance of three richly documented monographs assembling the diverse and often complex evidence for riding and traction in the pre-classical societies of the Near East and Europe (Littauer and Crouwel 1979: Crouwel 1981: Piggott 1983) provides an opportunity for reassessing a number of critical issues in the earliest history of the light, horse-drawn chariot, whose arrival in many ancient communities has long been seen as a source of significant change in politics and society.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin FM Final.Indd
    PREVIEW: INTRODUCTION • The Task of Introductions • Types of Introductions: Organized around • Archaeological Calendar • The Canon of the Bible • Daily Life • Archaeological Sites • Travel • History of Archaeology • Popular Interest • Organization of This Introduction • Popular Archaeology • Cultural History • Annales Archaeology • Processual Archaeology • Post-Processual Archaeology Introduction THE TASK OF INTRODUCTIONS TO the world of the Bible—and about the Bible itself. ARCHAEOLOGY AND THE BIBLE Together archaeology and the Bible unlock the most profound responses to the challenges that Th e three Rs of archaeology are to recover, to confront humans who want not only to make a read, and to reconstruct the cultural property living but also to make a diff erence in the world of now-extinct cultures (Magness 2002, 4–13; that is their home. Darvill 2002). Archaeologists listen to the sto- ries that stones—like architecture, art, pottery, Archaeology is the recovery, jewelry, weapons, and tools—have to tell. Stones interpretation, and reconstruction of and Stories: An Introduction to Archaeology and the cultural property of now-extinct the Bible describes how archaeologists listen, what cultures. they are hearing, and what a diff erence it makes for understanding the Bible. Archaeology is not the plunder of the trea- Archaeology in the world of the Bible does sures of ancient cultures, nor proving that the not prove the Bible wrong, any more than biblical Bible’s descriptions of people and events are his- archaeology proves the Bible right. Archaeology torically accurate, nor a legal remedy for deter- off ers new ways of defi ning the Bible in relation mining which people today have a legal right to to its own world, and of using it more eff ectively the land.
    [Show full text]
  • M. Witzel (2003) Sintashta, BMAC and the Indo-Iranians. a Query. [Excerpt
    M. Witzel (2003) Sintashta, BMAC and the Indo-Iranians. A query. [excerpt from: Linguistic Evidence for Cultural Exchange in Prehistoric Western Central Asia] (to appear in : Sino-Platonic Papers 129) Transhumance, Trickling in, Immigration of Steppe Peoples There is no need to underline that the establishment of a BMAC substrate belt has grave implications for the theory of the immigration of speakers of Indo-Iranian languages into Greater Iran and then into the Panjab. By and large, the body of words taken over into the Indo-Iranian languages in the BMAC area, necessarily by bilingualism, closes the linguistic gap between the Urals and the languages of Greater Iran and India. Uralic and Yeneseian were situated, as many IIr. loan words indicate, to the north of the steppe/taiga boundary of the (Proto-)IIr. speaking territories (§2.1.1). The individual IIr. languages are firmly attested in Greater Iran (Avestan, O.Persian, Median) as well as in the northwestern Indian subcontinent (Rgvedic, Middle Vedic). These materials, mentioned above (§2.1.) and some more materials relating to religion (Witzel forthc. b) indicate an early habitat of Proto- IIr. in the steppes south of the Russian/Siberian taiga belt. The most obvious linguistic proofs of this location are the FU words corresponding to IIr. Arya "self-designation of the IIr. tribes": Pre-Saami *orja > oarji "southwest" (Koivulehto 2001: 248), ārjel "Southerner", and Finnish orja, Votyak var, Syry. ver "slave" (Rédei 1986: 54). In other words, the IIr. speaking area may have included the S. Ural "country of towns" (Petrovka, Sintashta, Arkhaim) dated at c.
    [Show full text]
  • Languages and Migrations in Prehistoric Europe Roots of Europe Summer Seminar
    Languages and migrations in prehistoric Europe Roots of Europe summer seminar 7–12 August 2018 National Museum of Denmark & the University of Copenhagen Languages and migrations in prehistoric Europe Roots of Europe summer seminar 7–10 August 2018 National Museum of Denmark Festsalen Ny Vestergade 10 Prinsens Palæ DK-1471 København K 11–12 August 2018 University of Copenhagen Faculty of Humanities (KUA) Multisalen (Room 21.0.54) Emil Holms Kanal 6 The Roots of Europe Summer Seminar Preface The Roots of Europe Research Center has its origins in a so-called Programme of Excellence funded by the University of Copenhagen and hosted by the De- partment of Nordic Studies and Linguistics. The founding members were a group of historical linguists specializing in Indo-European Studies, a disci- pline that goes back two centuries at the University of Copenhagen, to the days when the linguist and philologist Rasmus Rask (1787–1832) carried out 2 his ground-breaking research. The programme marked a new epoch in modern-day Indo-European stud- ies in that it began to incorporate the findings of archaeology and genetics in its quest to understand the prehistorical spread of the Indo-European lan- guages. This was not the first attempt to relate the many branches of the fam- Preface ily tree to material cultures and, indeed, genes. However, previous attempts were abandoned, after the field was, figuratively speaking, taken hostage by a nefarious alliance of pseudoscientific researchers and politicians around the turn and first half of the 20th century. After the Second World War, collaborations between archaeologists and linguists became rare and generally frowned upon.
    [Show full text]
  • Read It Here
    Case 5:13-cv-05570-JLS Document 64 Filed 03/11/14 Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No: 5:13-cv-05570 (JSL) VS. ENTERTAINMENT THEATRE GROUP d/b/a AMERICAN MUSIC THEATRE; JAMES D. MARTIN; FREDERICK W. STEUDLER, JR.; and DWIGHT H. BRUBAKER, Defendants, and STAN LEE MEDIA, INC., Defendant / Intervenor. ENTERTAINMENT THEATRE GROUP d/b/a AMERICAN MUSIC THEATRE, Counterclaim-Plaintiff, and Case No: 5:13-cv-05570 (JSL) STAN LEE MEDIA, INC. Counterclaim-Plaintiff/Intervenor, -against- DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC.; and MARVEL CHARACTERS, INC., Deadline.comCounterclaim-Defendants. DEFENDANTS' OPPOSITION IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO DISMISS AMENDED COUNTERCLAIMS AND INTERVENOR COMPLAINT AND TO STRIKE AMENDED AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES Case 5:13-cv-05570-JLS Document 64 Filed 03/11/14 Page 2 of 30 Table of Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 II. BACKGROUND 3 III. ARGUMENT 6 A. Legal Standard 6 B. Res Judicata Does Not Bar AMT's Counterclaims And Affirmative Defenses As The Causes Of Action At Issue In This Litigation Are Not The Same Causes Of Action At Issue In The Prior SLMI-Related Litigations. 7 1. The Present Litigation Does Not Involve The Same Cause Of Action As The Prior SLMI-Related Litigations. 8 2. AMT Is Not In Privity With SLMI Or The Abadin Plaintiffs And, Thus, AMT Cannot Be Bound By The Decisions Reached In The Prior SLMI-Related Litigations. 12 C. Collateral Estoppel Or Issue Preclusion Does Not Bar AMT's Counterclaims As Identical Issues Are Not Present And The Issue Of Ownership Has Never Been Actually Litigated 15 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on 666 in the Old Testament
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Sciences 6-1999 Observations on 666 in the Old Testament M. G. Michael University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Michael, M. G.: Observations on 666 in the Old Testament 1999. https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/672 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Observations on 666 in the Old Testament Disciplines Physical Sciences and Mathematics Publication Details This article was originally published as Michael, MG, Observations on 666 in the Old Testament, Bulletin of Biblical Studies, 18, January-June 1999, 33-39. This journal article is available at Research Online: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/672 RULLeTIN OF RIRLICkL STuDies Vol. 18, January - June 1999, Year 28 CONTENTS Prof. George Rigopoulos, ...~ Obituary for Oscar Cullmann 5 .., Prof. Savas Agourides, The Papables of Preparedness in Matthew's Gospel 18 Michael G. Michael, Observations on 666 in the Old Testament. 33 Prof. George Rigopoulos, Jesus and the Greeks (Exegetical Approach of In. 12,20-26) (Part B'). .. 40 Zoltan Hamar, Grace more immovable than the mountains 53 Raymond Goharghi, The land of Geshen in Egypt. The Ixos 99 Bookreviews: Prof. S. Agourides: Jose Saramagu, The Gospel according to Jesus - Karen Armstrong, In the Beginning, A new Interpretation ojthe Book ojGenesis ; 132 EDITIONS «ARTOS ZOES» ATHENS RULLeTIN OF RIRLIC~L STuDies Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Pdblications of the Marvel Comics Group Warrant Serious Consideration As .A Legitimate Narrative Enterprise
    DOCU§ENT RESUME ED 190 980 CS 005 088 AOTHOR Palumbo, Don'ald TITLE The use of, Comics as an Approach to Introducing the Techniques and Terms of Narrative to Novice Readers. PUB DATE Oct 79 NOTE 41p.: Paper' presented at the Annual Meeting of the Popular Culture Association in the South oth, Louisville, KY, October 18-20, 19791. EDFS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage." DESCRIPTORS Adolescent Literature:,*Comics (Publications) : *Critical Aeading: *English Instruction: Fiction: *Literary Criticism: *Literary Devices: *Narration: Secondary, Educition: Teaching Methods ABSTRACT The pdblications of the Marvel Comics Group warrant serious consIderation as .a legitimate narrative enterprise. While it is obvious. that these comic books can be used in the classroom as a source of reading material, it is tot so obvious that these comic books, with great economy, simplicity, and narrative density, can be used to further introduce novice readers to the techniques found in narrative and to the terms employed in the study and discussion of a narrative. The output of the Marvel Conics Group in particular is literate, is both narratively and pbSlosophically sophisticated, and is ethically and morally responsible. Some of the narrative tecbntques found in the stories, such as the Spider-Man episodes, include foreshadowing, a dramatic fiction narrator, flashback, irony, symbolism, metaphor, Biblical and historical allusions, and mythological allusions.4MKM1 4 4 *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** ) U SOEPANTMENTO, HEALD.. TOUCATiONaWELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE CIF 4 EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT was BEEN N ENO°. DOCEO EXACTLY AS .ReCeIVED FROM Donald Palumbo THE PE aSON OR ORGANIZATIONORIGuN- ATING T POINTS VIEW OR OPINIONS Department of English STATED 60 NOT NECESSARILY REPRf SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF O Northern Michigan University EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY CO Marquette, MI.
    [Show full text]
  • (“Spider-Man”) Cr
    PRIVILEGED ATTORNEY-CLIENT COMMUNICATION EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED LICENSE AGREEMENT (“SPIDER-MAN”) CREATIVE ISSUES This memo summarizes certain terms of the Second Amended and Restated License Agreement (“Spider-Man”) between SPE and Marvel, effective September 15, 2011 (the “Agreement”). 1. CHARACTERS AND OTHER CREATIVE ELEMENTS: a. Exclusive to SPE: . The “Spider-Man” character, “Peter Parker” and essentially all existing and future alternate versions, iterations, and alter egos of the “Spider- Man” character. All fictional characters, places structures, businesses, groups, or other entities or elements (collectively, “Creative Elements”) that are listed on the attached Schedule 6. All existing (as of 9/15/11) characters and other Creative Elements that are “Primarily Associated With” Spider-Man but were “Inadvertently Omitted” from Schedule 6. The Agreement contains detailed definitions of these terms, but they basically conform to common-sense meanings. If SPE and Marvel cannot agree as to whether a character or other creative element is Primarily Associated With Spider-Man and/or were Inadvertently Omitted, the matter will be determined by expedited arbitration. All newly created (after 9/15/11) characters and other Creative Elements that first appear in a work that is titled or branded with “Spider-Man” or in which “Spider-Man” is the main protagonist (but not including any team- up work featuring both Spider-Man and another major Marvel character that isn’t part of the Spider-Man Property). The origin story, secret identities, alter egos, powers, costumes, equipment, and other elements of, or associated with, Spider-Man and the other Creative Elements covered above. The story lines of individual Marvel comic books and other works in which Spider-Man or other characters granted to SPE appear, subject to Marvel confirming ownership.
    [Show full text]
  • 150506-Woudhuizen Bw.Ps, Page 1-168 @ Normalize ( Microsoft
    The Ethnicity of the Sea Peoples 1 2 THE ETHNICITY OF THE SEA PEOPLES DE ETNICITEIT VAN DE ZEEVOLKEN Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam op gezag van de rector magnificus Prof.dr. S.W.J. Lamberts en volgens besluit van het College voor Promoties. De openbare verdediging zal plaatsvinden op vrijdag 28 april 2006 om 13.30 uur door Frederik Christiaan Woudhuizen geboren te Zutphen 3 Promotiecommissie Promotor: Prof.dr. W.M.J. van Binsbergen Overige leden: Prof.dr. R.F. Docter Prof.dr. J. de Mul Prof.dr. J. de Roos 4 To my parents “Dieser Befund legt somit die Auffassung nahe, daß zumindest für den Kern der ‘Seevölker’-Bewegung des 14.-12. Jh. v. Chr. mit Krieger-Stammesgruppen von ausgeprägter ethnischer Identität – und nicht lediglich mit einem diffus fluktuierenden Piratentum – zu rechnen ist.” (Lehmann 1985: 58) 5 CONTENTS Preface ................................................................................................................................................................................9 Note on the Transcription, especially of Proper Names....................................................................................................11 List of Figures...................................................................................................................................................................12 List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]