Death Row Inmates Known to Ldf: 3,697

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Death Row Inmates Known to Ldf: 3,697 TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,697 Race of Defendant: White 1,665 (45.04%) Black 1,603 (43.36%) Latino/Latina 347 ( 9.39%) Native American 40 ( 1.08%) Asian 41 ( 1.11%) Unknown at this issue 1 ( .03%) Gender: Male 3,643 (98.54%) Female 54 ( 1.46%) Juveniles: Male 83 ( 2.25%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 40 (Underlined jurisdiction has statute but no sentences imposed) Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 13 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2002 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for October Term 2002 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Virginia v. Black, No. 01-1107 (Cross-burning prosecution) (decision below 553 S.E.2d 738 (Va. 2002)) Question Presented: Does Virginia statute that bans cross-burning with intent to intimidate violate First Amendment, even though statute reaches all such intimidation and is not limited to any racial, religious, or other content-focused category? Fifth Amendment Sattazahn v. Pennsylvania, No. 01-7574 (Double jeopardy / due process; Death sentence after imposition of life sentence) (decision below 763 A.2d 359 (2000)) Questions Presented: (1) Does the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment bar imposition of the death penalty upon reconviction after an initial conviction, set aside on appeal, in which the trial court imposed a statutorily mandated life sentence when the capital sentencing jury failed to reach a unanimous verdict? (2) Is a capital defendant’s life and liberty interest in the imposition of a life sentence by operation of state law, following a capital sentencing hearing in which the sentencing jury fails to reach a unanimous verdict, violated when his first conviction is later overturned and the state seeks and obtains a death sentence on retrial? Eighth Amendment Ewing v. California, No. 01-6978 (California “Three Strikes” law & cruel & unusual punishment clause) (decision below unreported) Question Presented: Does petitioner’s twenty-five-years-to-life prison sentence violate the federal constitutional provision against cruel and unusual punishments because his sentence is grossly disproportionate to the offense of stealing golf clubs? Lockyer v. Andrade, No. 01-1127 (California three-strikes law & cruel & unusual punishments clause) (decision below 270 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2001)) Question Presented: (1) Does California’s three-strikes law, which provides for prison term of 25 years to life for third strike conviction, violate Eighth Amendment’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment when applied to a defendant whose “third strike” conviction is for petty larceny with prior theft-related convictions? Fourteenth Amendment Miller-El v. Cockrell, Director, No. 01-7622 (Racial discrimination in jury selection) (decision below 261 F.3d 445 (5th Cir. 2001)) Question Presented: Did the Court of Appeals err in denying a certificate of appealability and in evaluating petitioner’s claim under Batson v. Kentucky? Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 2. CASES RAISING HABEAS CORPUS QUESTIONS Abdur'Rahman v. Bell, No. 01-9094 (Rule 60(b) motions, successive petitions; intervening legal developments) (decision below, 226 F.3d 696 (6th Cir. 2002)) Questions Presented: (1) Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in holding, in square conflict with decisions of this Court and of other circuits, that every Rule 60(b) Motion constitutes a prohibited "second or successive" habeas petition as a matter of law; (2) Whether a court of appeals abuses its discretion in refusing to permit consideration of a vital intervening legal development when the failure to do so precludes a habeas petitioner from ever receiving any adjudication of his claims on the merits. Clay v. United States, No. 01-1500 (Statute of Limitations/AEDPA) (decision below unreported (7th Cir. 2001)) Question Presented: Whether petitioner’s judgment of conviction became “final” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ¶ 6(1) one year after the court of appeals issued its mandate on direct appeal or one year after his time for filing a petition for a writ of certiorari expired? Lockyer v. Andrade, No. 01-1127 (California three-strikes law & cruel & unusual punishments clause) (decision below 270 F.3d 743 (9th Cir. 2001)) Questions Presented: (2) In light of this Court’s existing jurisprudence concerning Eighth Amendment and proportionality in noncapital cases, did judgment of California Court of Appeal upholding habeas corpus petitioner’s sentence involve unreasonable application of clearly established federal law as determined by this Court within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (d)(1)? (3) Is the Ninth Circuit correct concerning the necessity for a habeas court analyzing a claim under AEDPA to first decide if the state court’s determination was erroneous before deciding whether the determination was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established federal law as determined by this court, or is the Fourth Circuit’s contrary view, expressed in Bell v. Jarvis, 236 F.3d 149 (4th Cir. 2000), correct? Massaro v. United States, No. 01-1559 (Ineffective assistance of trial counsel and waiver) (decision below No. 00-2720 (2nd Cir. 2002) summary order, unreported) Question Presented: Is federal defendant, whose new appellate counsel failed to raise claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel on direct appeal, procedurally barred from asserting that constitutional claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2255? Woodford v. Garceau, No. 01-1862 (AEDPA & McFarland) (decision below 275 F.3d 769 (9th Cir. 2001) Question Presented: What is correct triggering event for application of AEDPA in capital cases? 3. Cases Raising Other Important Federal Questions Chavez v. Martinez, No. 01-1444 (Coerced in-custody statements & qualified immunity) (decision below 270 F.3d 852 (9th Cir. 2002)) Questions Presented: (1) Was Ninth Circuit correct in characterizing this court’s Fifth Amendment discussion in United States v. Verdugo-Urquidez, 494 U.S. 259 (1990), as non- binding dicta and ignoring holding favorable to civil rights defendant? (2) Does violation of Fifth Amendment, potentially resulting in award of civil damages, occur at time of purported coercive Death Row U.S.A. Page 3 interview or only when and if the state introduces constitutionally violative statement in criminal proceeding? (3) Was Ninth Circuit correct in holding that conduct of investigating officer in this case was so offensive as to deny him qualified immunity? United States v. Recio, No. 01-1184 (Drug conspiracy, conspiracy law & defendant’s involvement after government intervenes)(decision below 258 F.3d 1069 (9th Cir. 2001)) Question Presented: Does conspiracy end as a matter of law when the government frustrates its objective? Washington Legal Foundation v. Legal Foundation of Washington, No. 01-1325 (Fifth Amendment takings clause and IOLTA funds) (decision below 271 F.3d 835 (9th Cir. 2002)) Questions Presented: (1) Does regulatory scheme for funding state legal services by systematically seizing interest on clients’ trust funds held in IOLTA accounts violate takings clause of 5th Amendment so that property owners are entitled to relief? (2) Is injunctive relief available to enjoin state from committing such violation of takings clause, when legislative scheme in issue clearly contemplates that no compensation would be paid to owners of interest taken, and when small amount due in any individual case often renders recovery through litigation impractical? Death Row U.S.A. Page 4 As of October 1, 2002 Total number of executions since the 1976 reinstatement of capital punishment: 802 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 102012521181825111623143138315645746898 00 01 02 85 66 53 Gender of defendants executed Gender of victims total number 802 total number 1217 Female ..........................9 ( 1.12%) Female.................... 594 (48.81%) Male ..........................793 (98.88%) Male ..................... 623 (51.19%) Race of defendants executed Race of victims White ......................... 454 (56.61%) White..................... 982 (80.69%) Black.......................... 278 (34.66%) Black..................... 168 (13.80%) Latino/a......................... 52 ( 6.48%) Latino/a.................... 43 ( 3.53%) Native American.................. 13 ( 1.62%) Native American.............. 3 ( .25%) Asian............................ 5 ( .62%) Asian...................... 21 ( 1.73%) Defendant-victim racial combinations White Victim Black Victim Latino/a Victim Asian Victim Native American Victim White Defendant 426 (53.12%) 12 (1.50%) 5 (.62%) 3 (.37%) 0 (0%) Black Defendant 178 (22.19%) 81 (10.10%) 8 (1.00%) 6 (.75%) 0 (0%) Latino/a Defendant 28 (3.49%) 2 (.25%) 19 (2.37%) 1 (.12%) 0 (0%) Asian Defendant 1 (.12%) 0 ( 0%) 0 (0%) 4 (.50%) 0 (0%) Native American 12 (1.50%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (.12%) TOTAL: 645 (80.42%) 95 (11.85%) 32 (3.99%) 14 (1.75%) 1 (.12%) Note: In addition, there were 15 defendants executed for the murders of multiple victims of different races. Of those, 8 defendants were white, 5 black and 2 Latino. (1.87%) Death Row U.S.A. Page 5 Execution Breakdown by State State # % of Racial Combinations (see codes Total below) 1. TX 284 35.41 138 W/W (49%); 63 B/W (22%); 22 L/W, 23 B/B (8% 19* 14# 2^ each); 17 L/L (6%); 8 B/L (3%); 3 B/A, 3 W/L (1% each); 2 A/A, 2 N/W (.7% each); 1 L/B, 1 L/A, 1 W/A (.4% each) 2.
Recommended publications
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Summer 2017 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Consultant to the Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Summer 2017 (As of July 1, 2017) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 2,817 Race of Defendant: White 1,196 (42.46%) Black 1,168 (41.46%) Latino/Latina 373 (13.24%) Native American 26 (0.92%) Asian 53 (1.88%) Unknown at this issue 1 (0.04%) Gender: Male 2,764 (98.12%) Female 53 (1.88%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CURRENT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 33 Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT DEATH PENALTY STATUTES: 20 Alaska, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico [see note below], New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. [NOTE: New Mexico repealed the death penalty prospectively. The men already sentenced remain under sentence of death.] Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Spring 2017 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2016 or 2017 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS First Amendment Packingham v. North Carolina, No. 15-1194 (Use of websites by sex offender) (decision below 777 S.E.2d 738 (N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 25 No. 3 Oklahoma's First Senator Dies
    Vol. 25 No. 3 Oklahoma’s First Senator Dies ------------------------------------------------------------ 178 Save the Historical Records by Charles Evans ------------------------------------------- 180 History of Phillips University by I.N. McCash ----------------------------------------- 181 Israel G. Vore and Levering Manual Labor School by Carolyn Thomas Foreman - 198 The First Hospital and Training School for Nurses in the Indian Territory, Now Oklahoma by Fred S. Clinton -------------------------------------------------------------- 218 The Diary of Charles Hazelrigg by Angie Debo ---------------------------------------- 229 Oklahoma War Memorial – World War II by Muriel H. Wright ---------------------- 271 Registration and Drawing for Opening of Kiowa and Comanche Country, 1901 By E.H. Linzee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 289 Notes and Documents ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 295 Necrologies Junius Talcott Foote by Robert L. Williams ------------------------------------ 299 James Arthur Harris by Robert L. Williams ------------------------------------ 300 John B. Harrison by Robert L. Williams ---------------------------------------- 301 Bert E. Nussbaum Muskogee Bar Association. By Homer Baughman, Chairman, Howell Parks, and George W. Leopold ------------------------------------------ 303 Minutes --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 304 178 Chronicle, of Oklahoma OKLAHOMNS FIRST SENATOR DIES Early
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad Christopher Q
    Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 2003 Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad Christopher Q. Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons How does access to this work benefit oy u? Let us know! Recommended Citation Christopher Q. Culter, Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad, 50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 335 (2002-2003) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTHING LESS THAN THE DIGNITY OF MAN: EVOLVING STANDARDS, BOTCHED EXECUTIONS AND UTAH’S CONTROVERSIAL USE OF THE FIRING SQUAD CHRISTOPHER Q. CUTLER1 Human justice is sadly lacking in consolation; it can only shed blood for blood. But we mustn’t ask that it do more than it can.2 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 336 II. HISTORICAL USE OF UTAH’S FIRING SQUAD........................ 338 A. The Firing Squad from Wilderness to Statehood ................................................................. 339 B. From Statehood to Furman ......................................... 347 1. Gary Gilmore to the Present Death Row Crowd ................................................ 357 2. Modern Firing Squad Procedure .......................... 363 III. EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE ................................ 365 A. A History of Pain ......................................................... 366 B. Early Supreme Court Cases......................................... 368 C. Evolving Standards of Decency and the Dignity of Man...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tor in Oklahoma All the Experiences That Went Into the Making of the Nation Have Been Speeded Up
    Tor in Oklahoma all the experiences that went into the making of the nation have been speeded up. Here all the American traits have been intensified.The one who can interpret Oklahoma can grasp the meaning of America in the modern world." —Angie Debo, Oklahoma: Footloose and Fancy Free, 1949 Every one of these United States touts its unique place in the American Story, but few have as curious a history as Oklahoma. Its place on the continent would have predicted statehood much sooner than 1907, when Oklahoma became the 46th Star. But the federal Indian Removal Act of 1830 and the establishment of an Indian Territory would put the land on a different path, diverging from the logical progression of the white man's Manifest Destiny. csnl^afo /jeu-cr The relocated tribes were promised their new land "as long as the waters run" by U.S. treaty. The tribes would find the promise broken in the latter years of the nineteenth century when Indian Territory saw the breakup of reservations, and then in the early twentieth century when the collective tribes were denied a state of their own. Instead, the territory would join with Oklahoma Territory to form the new state. When areas of the territories were opened for settlement through land runs and lotteries, African Ameri­ cans came to fulfill the promise of equality, only to see the promise shattered with the establishment of Jim Crow laws. Even the "promised land" promoted during the runs and lotteries would ultimately lead to broken dreams for many Euro-Americans, who would see desperate hardship in the depression, drought, and farm crisis of the 1930s.
    [Show full text]
  • EXCAVATION of CATCLAW CAVE, LOWER COLORADO RIVER Barton
    Excavation of Catclaw Cave, lower Colorado River Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Wright, Barton Allen. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/09/2021 11:58:22 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/191410 EXCAVATION OF CATCLAW CAVE, LOWER COLORADO RIVER by Barton Allen Wright A Thesis submitted to the faculty of the Department of Anthropology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of NASTER OF ARTS in the Graduate College, University of Arizona 1 95L1. App roved: Director of Th E779t 76 This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of re- quirements for an advanced degree at the University of Ariz- ona and is deposited in the Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this t]aesis are allowable without special permission, pro- vided that accurate acimowlecigment of source is made. Re- quests for permission for extended quotation from or repro- duction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the dean of the Grad- uate College when in their judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship. In all other instances, however, permission must be obtained from the author. SIGNED: 11 TABLE OF CONTB1JTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS ...........
    [Show full text]
  • Looking for Usonia: Preserving Frank Lloyd Wright's Post-1935 Residential Designs As Generators of Cultural Landscapes
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1-1-2006 Looking for Usonia: preserving Frank Lloyd Wright's post-1935 residential designs as generators of cultural landscapes William Randall Brown Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Recommended Citation Brown, William Randall, "Looking for Usonia: preserving Frank Lloyd Wright's post-1935 residential designs as generators of cultural landscapes" (2006). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 19369. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/19369 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Looking for Usonia: Preserving Frank Lloyd Wright's post-1935 residential designs as generators of cultural landscapes by William Randall Brown A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major: Architectural Studies Program of Study Committee: Arvid Osterberg, Major Professor Daniel Naegele Karen Quance Jeske Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2006 Copyright ©William Randall Brown, 2006. All rights reserved. 11 Graduate C of I ege Iowa State University This i s to certify that the master' s thesis of V~illiam Randall Brown has met the thesis requirements of Iowa State University :atures have been redact` 111 LIST OF TABLES iv ABSTRACT v INTRODUCTION 1 LITERATURE REVIEW 5 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK The state of Usonia 8 A brief history of Usonia 9 The evolution of Usonian design 13 Preserving Usonia 19 Toward a cultural landscape 21 METHODOLOGY 26 CASE STUDIES: HOUSE MUSEUMS ON PRIVATE LAND No.
    [Show full text]
  • Districts by County (PDF)
    Post Listing - By District/County/Location District County Post Location Post No. Postname 1 CEDAR BENNETT LGN 0104 RIXE-LAUSEN 1 CEDAR CLARENCE LGN 0286 VICTORY 1 CEDAR DURANT LGN 0430 LT JULIUS L SHRYER 1 CEDAR LOWDEN LGN 0366 LILLIS-DEERBERG 1 CEDAR MECHANICSVILLE LGN 0309 BUSCH-DENNIS 1 CEDAR STANWOOD LGN 0348 HEGARTY-BUSCHING 1 CEDAR TIPTON LGN 0123 GAREY-WHALEN 1 CEDAR WEST BRANCH LGN 0514 CHAUNCEY BUTLER 1 DES MOINES BURLINGTON LGN 0052 BURLINGTON 1 DES MOINES MEDIAPOLIS LGN 0243 DANIEL MATSON 1 HENRY MT. PLEASANT LGN 0058 BOB TRIBBY 1 HENRY OLDS LGN 0626 OLDS 1 HENRY SALEM LGN 0094 SIMKIN-PIDGEON 1 HENRY TRENTON LGN 0478 ACKLES-ROBERTS 1 HENRY WAYLAND LGN 0401 BAIN-HULME 1 HENRY WINFIELD LGN 0643 WINFIELD 1 IOWA MARENGO LGN 0076 WANDLING-WENDEL 1 IOWA MILLERSBURG LGN 0521 MILLERSBURG 1 IOWA NORTH ENGLISH LGN 0488 ROSS T HADLEY 1 IOWA PARNELL LGN 0369 VINCENT CARNEY 1 IOWA VICTOR LGN 0054 HAROLD E SMITH 1 IOWA WILLIAMSBURG LGN 0228 KUCH-QUERL 1 JEFFERSON BATAVIA LGN 0667 WILLIAM C HARNESS 1 JEFFERSON FAIRFIELD LGN 0047 ALLEN JEWETT 1 JOHNSON CORALVILLE LGN 0721 WALTER JOHNSON 1 JOHNSON IOWA CITY LGN 0017 ROY L CHOPEK/WALTER "BUD" OTT 1 JOHNSON LONE TREE LGN 0457 JOHN L MUMM 1 JOHNSON NORTH LIBERTY LGN 1976 BICENTENNIAL 1 JOHNSON OXFORD LGN 0537 FRANK VERCHERKA 1 JOHNSON SOLON LGN 0460 STINOCHER 1 JOHNSON SWISHER LGN 0671 SWISHER 1 LEE DONNELLSON LGN 0474 GILLASPEY-MOODIE 1 LEE FORT MADISON LGN 0082 FORT MADISON 1 LEE KEOKUK LGN 0041 KEOKUK 1 LEE WEST POINT LGN 0668 HOLTZ-GEERS 1 LOUISA COLUMBUS JCT.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Works
    University of Oklahoma Libraries Western History Collections Works Progress Administration Historic Sites and Federal Writers’ Projects Collection Compiled 1969 - Revised 2002 Works Progress Administration (WPA) Historic Sites and Federal Writers’ Project Collection. Records, 1937–1941. 23 feet. Federal project. Book-length manuscripts, research and project reports (1937–1941) and administrative records (1937–1941) generated by the WPA Historic Sites and Federal Writers’ projects for Oklahoma during the 1930s. Arranged by county and by subject, these project files reflect the WPA research and findings regarding birthplaces and homes of prominent Oklahomans, cemeteries and burial sites, churches, missions and schools, cities, towns, and post offices, ghost towns, roads and trails, stagecoaches and stage lines, and Indians of North America in Oklahoma, including agencies and reservations, treaties, tribal government centers, councils and meetings, chiefs and leaders, judicial centers, jails and prisons, stomp grounds, ceremonial rites and dances, and settlements and villages. Also included are reports regarding geographical features and regions of Oklahoma, arranged by name, including caverns, mountains, rivers, springs and prairies, ranches, ruins and antiquities, bridges, crossings and ferries, battlefields, soil and mineral conservation, state parks, and land runs. In addition, there are reports regarding biographies of prominent Oklahomans, business enterprises and industries, judicial centers, Masonic (freemason) orders, banks and banking, trading posts and stores, military posts and camps, and transcripts of interviews conducted with oil field workers regarding the petroleum industry in Oklahoma. ____________________ Oklahoma Box 1 County sites – copy of historical sites in the counties Adair through Cherokee Folder 1. Adair 2. Alfalfa 3. Atoka 4. Beaver 5. Beckham 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad
    Cleveland State Law Review Volume 50 Issue 3 Article 3 2003 Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad Christopher Q. Cutler Follow this and additional works at: https://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Criminal Law Commons, and the Criminal Procedure Commons How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! Recommended Citation Christopher Q. Culter, Nothing Less than the Dignity of Man: Evolving Standards, Botched Executions and Utah's Controversial Use of the Firing Squad, 50 Clev. St. L. Rev. 335 (2002-2003) This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized editor of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTHING LESS THAN THE DIGNITY OF MAN: EVOLVING STANDARDS, BOTCHED EXECUTIONS AND UTAH’S CONTROVERSIAL USE OF THE FIRING SQUAD CHRISTOPHER Q. CUTLER1 Human justice is sadly lacking in consolation; it can only shed blood for blood. But we mustn’t ask that it do more than it can.2 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 336 II. HISTORICAL USE OF UTAH’S FIRING SQUAD........................ 338 A. The Firing Squad from Wilderness to Statehood ................................................................. 339 B. From Statehood to Furman ......................................... 347 1. Gary Gilmore to the Present Death Row Crowd ................................................ 357 2. Modern Firing Squad Procedure .......................... 363 III. EIGHTH AMENDMENT JURISPRUDENCE ................................ 365 A. A History of Pain ......................................................... 366 B. Early Supreme Court Cases......................................... 368 C. Evolving Standards of Decency and the Dignity of Man...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Death Row U.S.A
    DEATH ROW U.S.A. Winter 2005 A quarterly report by the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Deborah Fins, Esq. Director of Research and Student Services, Criminal Justice Project NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Death Row U.S.A. Winter 2005 (As of January 1, 2005) TOTAL NUMBER OF DEATH ROW INMATES KNOWN TO LDF: 3,455 Race of Defendant: White 1,576 (45.62%) Black 1,444 (41.79%) Latino/Latina 356 (10.30%) Native American 39 ( 1.13%) Asian 40 ( 1.16%) Unknown at this issue 1 ( .03%) Gender: Male 3,401 (98.44%) Female 54 ( 1.56%) Juveniles: Male 79 ( 2.29%) JURISDICTIONS WITH CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 40 (Underlined jurisdiction has statute but no sentences imposed) Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wyoming, U.S. Government, U.S. Military. JURISDICTIONS WITHOUT CAPITAL PUNISHMENT STATUTES: 13 Death Row U.S.A. Page 1 Alaska, District of Columbia, Hawaii, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, North Dakota, Rhode Island, Vermont, West Virginia, Wisconsin. Death Row U.S.A. Page 2 In the United States Supreme Court Update to Fall 2004 Issue of Significant Criminal, Habeas, & Other Pending Cases for Cases to Be Decided in October Term 2004 1. CASES RAISING CONSTITUTIONAL QUESTIONS Fourth Amendment Devenpeck v. Alford, No. 03-710 (Probable cause to arrest and qualified immunity) (decision below Alford v.
    [Show full text]
  • This Document Is Made Available Electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library As Part of an Ongoing Digital Archiving Project
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp BIBLIOGRAPHY OF SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND WRITINGS ON AMIIEIRIICAN IINIDIIANS RUSSELL THORNTON and MARY K. GRASMICK ~ ~" 'lPIH/:\RyrII~ F l\IHNN QlA A publication of the Center for Urban and Regional Affairs, 311 Walter Library, 117 Pleasant St. S.E., University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455 The content of this report is the responsibility of the authors and is not necessarily endorsed by CURA. Publication No. 79-1, 1979. Cover design by Janet Huibregtse. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 American and Ethnic Studies Journals . 3 Journals Surveyed 4 Bibliography 5 Economics Journals 13 Journals Surveyed 14 Bibliography 15 Geography Journals 17 Journals Surveyed 18 Bibliography 19 History Journals . 25 Journals Surveyed . 26 Bibliography 28 Interdisciplinary Social Science Journals .133 Journals Surveyed .134 Bibliography .135 Political Science Journals . .141 Journals Surveyed .142 Bibliography .143 Sociology Journals • .145 Journals Surveyed . .146 Bibliography .148 INTRODUCTION Social science disciplines vary widely in the extent to which they contain scholarly knowledge on American Indians. Anthropology and history contain the most knowledge pertaining to American Indians, derived from their long traditions of scholarship focusing on American Indians. The other social sciences are far behind. Consequently our social science knowledge about American Indian peoples and their concerns is not balanced but biased by the disciplinary perspectives of anthropology and history. The likelihood that American society contains little realistic knowledge about contemporary American Indians in comparison to knowledge about traditional and historical American Indians is perhaps a function of this disciplinary imbalance.
    [Show full text]
  • ETHJ Vol-21 No-1
    East Texas Historical Journal Volume 21 Issue 1 Article 1 3-1983 ETHJ Vol-21 No-1 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj Part of the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Recommended Citation (1983) "ETHJ Vol-21 No-1," East Texas Historical Journal: Vol. 21 : Iss. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ethj/vol21/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the History at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in East Texas Historical Journal by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VOLUME XXI 1983 NUMBER 1 EAST TEXAS HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION OFFICERS Irvin May __ , .......... .. __ _._._ ___ __ _._ President Bob Bowman ....._. First Vice Prc ideol William J. Brophy Second Vice President Ms. Tommie Jan Lowery ....... "'__ "" "'_ ._ ._ Treasurer DIRECTORS J. Millon ance. .__ College Station •__ __ 1983 John C. Britl __ .__ Baylown _._. __ _.. __ 1983 Donald R. Whisenhunt '... __ ., Tyler . 1984 Ms. Jewel Cates.. .. __ Dallas 1984 Ms. Margaret Swett Hen~on Houston 1984 James Conrad ommerce 1985 Joe L. White Kilgore _ 1985 Ms. Alice Gilbert Tyler . 1985 Ms. Marion Holt Beaumont .. ex·Presideni Max. S. Laic . •..•.................. Marshall .. ex·President F. Lee Lawrenc~ Tyler . .. DirtCfOr Emeritus William R. Johnson acogdoches u·o//icio James V. Reese acogdoches ex-officio EDITORIAL BOARD Allen Ashcraft .. College Station Roben Glover . _ Tyler Ralph Goodwin _ Commerce Bobby H.
    [Show full text]