DOCSLIB.ORG

EASO Asylum Report 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EASO Asylum Report 2021 EASO Asylum Report 2021 Annual Report on the Situation of Asylum in the European Union Cover image: Steve Evans © European Asylum Support Office, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. For any use of reproduction of photos or other material that is not under the EASO copyright, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder. PDF ISBN 978-92-9465-049-8 ISSN 2314-9701 DOI 10.2847/6007 BZ-AB-21-001-EN-N HTML ISBN 978-92-9465-048-1 ISSN 2314-9701 DOI 10.2847/692856 BZ-AB-21-001-EN-Q EPUB ISBN 978-92-9465-047-4 ISSN 2314-9701 DOI 10.2847/165462 BZ-AB-21-001-EN-E EASO Asylum Report 2021 Annual Report on the Situation of Asylum in the European Union SUPPORT IS OUR MISSION EASO Asylum Report 2021 Foreword This year marks the 10th edition of the agency’s flagship publication, the EASO Asylum Report. The report has been continuously improved over the years to capture and report on the latest trends and policy discussions centred around building a harmonised Common European Asylum System (CEAS). We are proud that the EASO Asylum Report has evolved into the go-to source of information on asylum in Europe and reflects the growth of the agency as a centre of expertise on asylum since its founding on 19 June 2010. Indeed, EASO’s growing role is highlighted in the European Commission’s new Pact on Migration and Asylum, which was published in September 2020. The pact offers a fresh start to the discussion on an effective and humane management of migration and asylum in Europe. EASO stands ready to undertake an enhanced mandate as the EU Agency for Asylum (EUAA) and to serve as an integral part of the European framework to manage a complex migratory reality, in full respect of fundamental rights. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on every aspect of life throughout the world. With the aim of mitigating the spread of the virus and keeping people safe – both those seeking refuge in Europe and the staff who work directly with asylum seekers – emergency measures and longer-term changes to procedures were implemented across all EU+ countries. This year was the first time since CEAS was established that Member States, national asylum and reception authorities, and organisations working in the field of international protection were faced with a double-barrelled challenge: respecting the basic human right of living in safety and managing a global health crisis which could expose both migrants and receiving countries to further risk. While national administrations were tested to their limits, EASO’s activities were directly aimed at supporting Member States to ensure a continuity of services and to provide emergency assistance. Throughout 2020, the agency developed tools to enhance and align procedures, published analytical reports and trained asylum professionals. A dedicated information collection initiative provided up- to-date, comprehensive and reliable information on the impact of COVID-19 on the asylum procedure. The results showed the resilience of the EU’s national asylum and reception systems, which quickly adapted modalities and turned to digital solutions to provide refuge to those in need. These innovations may be the key to increase efficiency and address similar challenges in the future while maintaining a sustainable European system. Nina Gregori Executive Director European Asylum Support Office 5 Annual Report on the Situation of Asylum in the European Union Acknowledgements We would like to thank a number of organisations and institutions which actively contributed to this year’s edition of the EASO Asylum Report through direct contributions, consultations or feedback during the drafting process. In particular, we express our gratitude to asylum and reception authorities in EU+ countries for the continuous information-exchange throughout the year. From January to February 2021, EASO conducted a series of bilateral calls with experts from national authorities who form part of the EASO IDS Advisory Group to confirm primary facts and information on legislative, policy, practical and jurisprudential developments in asylum and reception which occurred during 2020. The contributions of national experts involved in EASO’s thematic networks are invaluable in helping EASO maintain an accurate and up-to-date overview of asylum-related developments in Europe and beyond. Information was also obtained from EU+ countries with the coordination of the European Migration Network (EMN). We are grateful to the European Commission for its continued support and feedback during the drafting process. Experts from the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) also provided valuable input. Through various channels, civil society organisations, academia and research institutions provided EASO with research findings and information from the ground. To present the full picture of asylum in 2020 and take account of all perspectives, contributions from these institutions and organisations were included in this report. To this end, EASO would like to acknowledge the following organisations which contributed to EASO Asylum Report 2021 by sharing their publications or through direct submissions and consultations: Abogacía Española – CGAE (Spain) Dutch Advisory Committee on Migration Affairs Accem (Spain) (Netherlands) Aditus Foundation (Malta) Dutch Council for Refugees (Netherlands) Andalucia Acoge (Spain) Equal Rights Beyond Borders (Greece-Germany) Are You Syrious (Croatia) European Council on Refugees and Exiles (ECRE) Associazione My Lawyer (Italy) (Belgium) Asylex (Switzerland) European Network on Statelessness (International) Asylum Protection Center (Serbia) European Trade Union Committee for Education Asylum Research Centre-ARC Foundation (United (ETUCE) Kingdom) Forum réfugiés-Cosi (France) Border Violence Monitoring Network (BVMN) Friedrich Ebert Stiftung -Brussels Office (Belgium) (International - Balkans) Fundación Cepaim (Spain) Caritas Cyprus (Cyprus) Greek Council for Refugees (Greece) Centro Astalli per l'assistenza agli immigrati ODV Háttér Society (Hungary) (Italy) Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights (Poland) Conseil National des Barreaux (France) Human Rights League (Slovakia) Consejo General de la Abogacía Española (Spain) HumanRights360 (Greece) Danish Refugee Council (Denmark) Hungarian Helsinki Committee (Hungary) Defensor del Pueblo Espana (Spain) Legal Centre Lesvos (Greece) DRC Greece (Greece) Ludwig Boltzman Institute for Fundamental Rights (Austria) 6 EASO Asylum Report 2021 Lumos Foundation (USA-United Kingdom) Refugee Rights Europe (United Kingdom) Malta Refugee Council (Malta) Refugee Support Aegean (Greece) METAdrasi (Greece) Save the Children (International) Migrant Integration Center -Brasov (Romania) Spanish Commission for Refugees -CEAR (Spain) Migration Policy Institute Europe (Belgium) Statewatch (International) Mobile Info Team (Greece) The Swedish Network of Refugee Support Groups Network for Children’s Rights (Greece) (FARR) (Sweden) Norwegian Organisation for Asylum Seekers Transgender Europe (TGEU) (Germany) (NOAS) (Norway) University of Nicosia, MiHUB (Cyprus) Organization for Aid to Refugees (OPU) and Forum Volontariato Internazionale per lo Sviluppo (VIS); for Human Rights (joint contribution; Czechia) Comitato per la promozione e protezione dei Platform for International Cooperation on dirittiumani; Don Bosco 2000; Salesiani per il Undocumented Migrants (PICUM) (International) Sociale; and Forum per Cambiare l’Ordine delle Queer Base (Austria) Cose (joint submission; Italy) Rädda Barnen-Save the Children (Sweden) Red Cross Europe (EU Office) 7 Annual Report on the Situation of Asylum in the European Union Acronyms and abbreviations ACSG Asylum Capacity Support Group AIDA Asylum Information Database AMIF Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund AVRR Assisted voluntary return and reintegration programmes AWAS Agency for the Welfare of Asylum Seekers (Malta) AZC Asylum seekers’ centre (asielzoekerscentrum) (Netherlands) BBU Federal Agency for Reception and Support Services (Bundesagentur für Betreuungs- und Unterstützungsleistungen GmbH) (Austria) BVMN Border Violence Monitoring Network CALL Council for Alien Law Litigation (Belgium) CAT UN Committee against Torture CEAS Common European Asylum System CEDAW UN Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women CEPOL EU Agency for Law Enforcement Training CGRS Commissioner General for Refugees and Stateless Persons (Belgium) CJEU Court of Justice of the European Union CNAIM National Centre for Supporting the Integration of Migrants (Portugal) COA Central Agency for the Reception of Asylum Seekers (Centraal Orgaan opvang asielzoekers) (Netherlands) COI Country of origin information CPT European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment DT&V Repatriation and Departure Service (Netherlands) EASO European Asylum Support Office ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights ECRE European Council on Refugees and Exiles EMCDDA European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction EMN European Migration Network ENS European Network on Statelessness EPS EASO’s Early Warning and Preparedness System ETCC Employer Tailored Chain Cooperation EU+ European Union Member States, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland eu-LISA European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale IT Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice EUAA EU Asylum Agency Eurojust EU Judicial Cooperation Agency Europol EU Agency for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central and Eastern Europe Development Outlook After the Coronavirus Pandemic
    CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK AFTER THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC Editor in Chief: Dr. Chen Xin Published by: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. Telephone: +36-1-5858-690 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: www.china-cee.eu Address: 1052, Budapest, Petőfi Sándor utca 11. Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin ISSN: 978-615-6124-29-6 Cover design: PONT co.lab Copyright: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. The reproduction of the study or parts of the study are prohibited. The findings of the study may only be cited if the source is acknowledged. Central and Eastern Europe Development Outlook after the Coronavirus Pandemic Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE Budapest, October 2020 Content Preface ............................................................................................................ 5 Part I POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK ..................................... 7 Albanian politics in post-pandemic era: reshuffling influence and preparing for the next elections .............................................................................................. 8 BiH political outlook after the COVID-19 pandemic ...................................... 13 Bulgarian Political Development Outlook in Post-Pandemic Era ..................... 18 Forecast of Croatian Political Events after the COVID-19 .............................. 25 Czech Political Outlook for the Post-Crisis Period .......................................... 30 Estonian political outlook after the pandemic: Are we there yet? ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Recommendations for starting a safe school year 2020-2021, while promoting quality inclusive education for all children in Romania The opinions expressed in this document belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of UNICEF. Executive summary his document was created to support the national, county, and local authorities to plan the beginning of the school year 2020-2021 safely for children and for all the school staff, as well Tas to provide quality inclusive education throughout this unprecedented worldwide situation. The goal was to identify a set of solutions which may help reduce both the impact of the pandemic upon learning, and the gaps in terms of access to education after schools were closed from March to July 2020 in Romania. This material was drafted by a team of 18 principals involved in implementing the ”Quality inclusive education: transition from lower to upper secondary education” model, and by representatives of the county institutions in Bacău, at the initiative and coordinated by UNICEF Romania. The recommendations proposed are based on the three scenarios displayed by the Ministry of Education and Research, as well as on the experience acquired by the education experts from March until July 2020, under the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. The solutions presented also show the outcomes of the consultations organized at a community level on topics such as challenges, vulnerabilities, constraints, and solutions specific to each and every scenario. Special attention was paid to vulnerable students and to those at risk of school drop-out . The considerations and the proposals submitted are equally looking at removing barriers for attending education, supporting learning and guaranteeing well-being for all students, as well as supplying the necessary support for teachers, school staff, and managerial teams, for them to be able to safely provide inclusive contexts and quality education services.
    [Show full text]
  • First Wave COVID-19 Pandemics in Greece Anastasiou E., Duquenne M-N
    First wave COVID-19 pandemics in Greece Anastasiou E., Duquenne M-N. The role of demographic, social and geographical factors In life satisfaction during the lockdown Preprint: DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.23684.55689 First wave COVID-19 pandemics in Greece: The role of demographic, social and geographical factors in life satisfaction during the lockdown Evgenia Anastasiou, Marie-Noelle Duquenne Laboratory of Demographic and Social Analyses (LDSA) Department of Planning and Regional Development, University of Thessaly, Volos, Greece, [email protected], [email protected] Abstract The onset of the coronavirus pandemic led to profound changes in populations' everyday lives. The main purpose of this research is to investigate the factors that affected life satisfaction during the first lockdown wave in Greece. A web-based survey was developed, and 4,305 questionnaires were completed corresponding to all Greek regional units. Statistical modeling (Multivariate Logistic Regression) was performed to evaluate in which extent significant geographical attributes and socioeconomic characteristics are likely to influence life satisfaction during the lockdown due to the pandemic. In the course of the present work, key findings emerge: Social distancing and confinement measures affected mostly men in relation to women. There is a strong positive association between life satisfaction and age, especially as regards older population. The change in the employment status, the increase in psychosomatic disorders and the increased usage of social media are also likely to impact negatively people’s life satisfaction. On the contrary, trust in government and the media and limited health concerns seem to have a strong association with subjective well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings Issn 2654-1823
    SAFEGREECE CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS ISSN 2654-1823 14-17.10 proceedings SafeGreece 2020 – 7th International Conference on Civil Protection & New Technologies 14‐16 October, on‐line | www.safegreece.gr/safegreece2020 | [email protected] Publisher: SafeGreece [www.safegreece.org] Editing, paging: Katerina – Navsika Katsetsiadou Title: SafeGreece 2020 on‐line Proceedings Copyright © 2020 SafeGreece SafeGreece Proceedings ISSN 2654‐1823 SafeGreece 2020 on-line Proceedings | ISSN 2654-1823 index About 1 Committees 2 Topics 5 Thanks to 6 Agenda 7 Extended Abstracts (Oral Presentations) 21 New Challenges for Multi – Hazard Emergency Management in the COVID-19 Era in Greece Evi Georgiadou, Hellenic Institute for Occupational Health and Safety (ELINYAE) 23 An Innovative Emergency Medical Regulation Model in Natural and Manmade Disasters Chih-Long Pan, National Yunlin University of Science and technology, Taiwan 27 Fragility Analysis of Bridges in a Multiple Hazard Environment Sotiria Stefanidou, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 31 Nature-Based Solutions: an Innovative (Though Not New) Approach to Deal with Immense Societal Challenges Thanos Giannakakis, WWF Hellas 35 Coastal Inundation due to Storm Surges on a Mediterranean Deltaic Area under the Effects of Climate Change Yannis Krestenitis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki 39 Optimization Model of the Mountainous Forest Areas Opening up in Order to Prevent and Suppress Potential Forest Fires Georgios Tasionas, Democritus University of Thrace 43 We and the lightning Konstantinos Kokolakis,
    [Show full text]
  • Rspg20-007 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CONTENT AND TECHNOLOGY Electronic Communications Networks and Services Radio Spectrum Policy Group RSPG Secretariat Brussels, 5 February 2020 RSPG20-007 FINAL RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP 23rd Progress Report of the RSPG Sub-Group on cross-border coordination RSPG Secretariat, Avenue de Beaulieu 33, B-1160, Bruxelles, office BU33 7/55 Telephone: direct line (+32-2)29.21.261, switchboard 299.11.11; Fax: (+32.2)296.83.95 E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://www.rspg-spectrum.eu Web-site CIRCABC : https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/f5b44016-a8c5-4ef6-a0bf-bc8d357debcb RSPG20-007 FINAL 23rd Progress Report of the RSPG Sub-Group on cross-border coordination The Sub-Group has held one meeting, 21st January in Roma, at the kind invitation of the Italian administration. The list of participants is attached in annex 1. The detailed report of the meeting is attached in annex 2. TV, T-DAB and FM interference around Italy For the details of the interference situation, please refer to the meeting report in annex 2: • For TV interference, there is no more interference to channels in operation in neighbouring countries except with Croatia where some interference remains on 5 channels. All these channels being used by local broadcasters, interference will cease when these Italian broadcaster will switch off, in accordance with the migration plan. • For TDAB interference, AGCOM is requested by law to develop a T-DAB plan fully in line with Italian international rights (GE-06 + coordination agreements). However, this can be done only after successful results of ongoing negotiations which aimed to optimize the GE-06 initial plan taking into account that planning was sometimes based on allotments and on DTV rather than DAB.
    [Show full text]
  • Lily Charlott Birkholm
    Cand.ling.merc. - Europæiske studier og tysk 77 sider (113 sider inkl. litteraturliste og bilag) / 174.394 anslag Kandidatafhandling 20. august 2015 VIND I ØSTEUROPA En analyse af det rumænske vindenergimarked, og om det er gunstigt for Vestas at etablere en produktionsenhed i Rumænien Lily Charlott Birkholm Vejleder: Lars Abel Osteuropäischer Wind - eine Untersuchung der Expansionsmöglichkeiten für Vestas in Rumänien Rumänien ist eines der Länder der ehemaligen Sowjetunion, das große Anstrengungen unternommen hat, um das Erbe des Kommunismus zu überwinden. Obwohl die Aussicht auf eine EU-Mitgliedschaft zu Reformen anregte, wurde die Aufnahme durch eine träge und undurchsichtige Verwaltung, politische Unruhen und Korruption verzögert. Dies hat sogleich die Bedingungen für die Einwohner und privaten Unternehmen erschwert. Auch im Energie- und Umweltbereich ist Rumänien lange rückständig gewesen und hat deshalb große Probleme mit der Umweltverschmutzung, die hauptsächlich auf die jahrzehntelange Verwendung von Kohle zurückzuführen sind. Aus diesem Grund ist die Nachfrage nach Umwelttechnik in Rumänien in den letzen zehn Jahren gestiegen. Es gibt in Rumänien seit langem ein wachsendes Interesse an der Windindustrie, und dieses hat zu einem großen Windturbinenexport ins Land geführt. Der weltweit operierende dänische Hersteller von Windkraftanlagen, Vestas Wind Systems, hat dort Aufträge erhalten, und dieses sollte weiterverfolgt werden. Aber Vestas befindet sich im starken Wettbewerb mit anderen Produzenten von Windkraftanlagen, die alle
    [Show full text]
  • Bucharest City Report Q2 2020
    City Report Q2 2020 COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2019 The Bridge, Bucharest Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic 59,273 €223.6 bn. -1.9% COVID-19 cases reported 2020 GDP 2020 Real GDP growth rate as of August 7th April 2020 forecast of the April 2020 forecast of the National Commission for National Commission for Strategy and Prognosis Strategy and Prognosis 102,830 463,000 Furloughed employment Total unemployed contracts July 3rd 2020 May 2020 Macroeconomic overview The COVID-19 crisis continued worldwide during Q2 and Romania made no exception. The economic impact was seen in a drastic reduction of GDP growth prognosis. There are different estimates issued by several institutions (ranging from -6% to 0.3%), all showing decreases from previous estimates, however two showing also a quick recovery in 2021 (3.9% or 4.2%, depending on the source). In April 2020, the National Commission for Strategy and Prognosis forecasted a -1.9% real GDP growth rate for 2020, compared to 4.1% at the beginning of the year. The latest prognosis issued by the World Bank estimated the country’s economic growth for 2020 to -5.7%, from an initial 3.8% at the start of the year. This is to be followed by a 5.4% growth rate in 2021. The International Monetary Fund expects Romania’s real GDP growth rate to fall to -5% in 2020, from 3.5%, as estimated in October 2019. However, the IMF also predicts that a 3.9% economic growth will follow in 2021. The EU Commission’s Summer 2020 Economic Forecast, released in July, estimates for Romania a GDP contraction of -6% in 2020 (from 3.6% in the Autumn forecast), followed by a 4% recovery in 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • GREECE © Gettyimages, Poike
    GREECE © gettyimages, Poike The Environmental Implementation Review 2019 COUNTRY REPORT GREECE Environment EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.4.2019 SWD(2019) 138 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT The EU Environmental Implementation Review 2019 Country Report - GREECE Accompanying the document Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Environmental Implementation Review 2019: A Europe that protects its citizens and enhances their quality of life {COM(2019) 149 final} - {SWD(2019) 111 final} - {SWD(2019) 112 final} - {SWD(2019) 113 final} - {SWD(2019) 114 final} - {SWD(2019) 115 final} - {SWD(2019) 116 final} - {SWD(2019) 117 final} - {SWD(2019) 118 final} - {SWD(2019) 119 final} - {SWD(2019) 120 final} - {SWD(2019) 121 final} - {SWD(2019) 122 final} - {SWD(2019) 123 final} - {SWD(2019) 124 final} - {SWD(2019) 125 final} - {SWD(2019) 126 final} - {SWD(2019) 127 final} - {SWD(2019) 128 final} - {SWD(2019) 129 final} - {SWD(2019) 130 final} - {SWD(2019) 131 final} - {SWD(2019) 132 final} - {SWD(2019) 133 final} - {SWD(2019) 134 final} - {SWD(2019) 135 final} - {SWD(2019) 136 final} - {SWD(2019) 137 final} - {SWD(2019) 139 final} EN EN This report has been written by the staff of the Directorate-General for Environment, European Commission. Comments are welcome, please send them to [email protected] More information on the European Union is available at http://europa.eu. Photographs: p. 11 — ©iStock/Poike; p. 14 — ©iStock/SHansche; p. 16 — ©iStock/saiko3p; p. 20 — ©iStock/marchello74; p. 29 — © iStock/alexandr6868 For reproduction or use of these photos, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holder.
    [Show full text]
  • EUPAN German Presidency Report 01 July – 31 December 2020
    Berlin, 29 January 2021 EUPAN German Presidency Report 01 July – 31 December 2020 1. Summary The German Presidency in the second semester of 2020 took place under the impression of the ongoing Covid-19 crisis. Regrettably, as was the case already under the Croatian Presidency in the first semester, there could be no physical meetings. Instead of holding a plenary meeting on the Working Level, Working Level colleagues were asked to engage via e-mail. Two Secretariat meetings on both the Working and Directors General Level were held in the virtual sphere. The plenary EUPAN Directors General Meeting took place via videoconference on 17 November 2020. The meeting on 17 November saw the launch of a EUPAN Summer School whose first edition will be organised by Germany in the summer of 2021. Covering the topics of integrity, trust and professionalism, the first EUPAN Summer School will provide exchange, insight and knowledge on prerequisites and circumstances in administrative responsibilities. The Covid-19 pandemic gravely influenced not only the organisational part of the German Presidency, but also its focal points. To further the work and goals of EUPAN in the light of ongoing exceptional circumstances, the German Presidency endeavoured to collect knowledge acquired and experiences made by public administrations in handling the (first wave of the) pandemic. The questionnaire it composed aimed to render different approaches visible and, in the end, comparable. Submissions were collected in August and September of 2020. Most EUPAN partners invested considerable time and effort to describe their administration’s general setup and its adaptation to the challenges of the coronavirus.
    [Show full text]
  • Commissioner Ylva Johansson (Migration
    Committee on Budgetary Control 2019 Discharge to the Commission WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO COMMISSIONER JOHANSSON Hearing on 30 November 2020 Questions concerning general issues 1. Are there programs affected by decommitment rule in 2019? What is the forecast for decommitment level at the end of the programming period and what measures does the Commission undertake to assist Member States to avoid decommitments? Commission’s answer: Programmes affected by the decommitment rule In 2019, the first decommitment exercise concerning the financial year 2016 was launched for the three Member States whose declaration of expenditure was substantially below the committed amounts in the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) (Portugal with € 0.4 million, Czechia with € 11.1 million and Hungary with € 0.002 million). In 2020 for the financial year 2017, the amounts were higher given the overall higher budgetary commitments. For the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund, the affected Member States are: Czechia € 2.2 million, Hungary € 2.7 million, Ireland € 7.1 million, Luxemburg € 0.19 million, Poland € 0.52 million, Slovakia € 1.2 million and Bulgaria € 0.002 million. Under the Internal Security Fund (ISF)-Police, France is affected by € 2.4 million. Forecast decommitment level The programme implementation of the national programmes under the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund and the Internal Security Fund is at cruising speed and we are carefully monitoring this promising progress. The cumulative disbursement to the Member States since the beginning of the Funds’ implementation amounts to: - Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund: € 2.5 billion - Internal Security Fund: € 1.6 billion These figures confirm a rising trend of absorption and we expect reduced risks of decommitment at the end of the eligibility period (December 2022).
    [Show full text]
  • The Nation of the Educated, American College in Greece
    “THE NATION OF THE EDUCATED” JON WESTLING President, Boston University I am very pleased to be here today. I come partly as an emissary of the New World, the “America” inscribed in the name of the American College of Greece, and partly as a fellow collegian. For though I am not a graduate of Deree College, I join you today as a fellow reader of worthy books, fellow examiner of important ideas, and fellow seeker of such truth as may be gained by means of disciplined intellectual inquiry and respect for evidence--as a fellow collegian in the fullest sense of that word. Customarily, emissaries present their hosts with gifts. I offer only a gift of words. I hope to give you something worth keeping, but I know that words of advice are among the rare presents that are preferred in very small quantities. When our national poet, Walt Whitman, proposed to speak for America, he proclaimed, “I am large, I contain multitudes.” What makes America multitudinous is not the great number of our people. There are nations larger in sheer population. Whitman’s multitude is the multitude of origins and variety: America as a place of immigrants from everywhere, and America as a place of vast, multitudinous mingling. 2 In this sense, since its founding, the United States has provided a continuing commentary on the idea of nationhood. Other nations, comprised in actuality of people from many origins, nonetheless cling to the myth that they share an ancient common origin. The United States stands as a living refutation of that idea of nationalism.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrants, Asylum Seekers and Refugees in Greece in the Midst of the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Comparative Cultural Studies: European and Latin American Perspectives 10: 39-58, 2020 DOI: 10.13128/ccselap-12297 | ISSN 2531-9884 (online) Article Migrants, asylum seekers and refugees in Greece in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic THEODOROS FOUSKAS Department of Public Health Policy, School of Public Health, University of West Attica E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. COVID-19 cases detected in accommodation centers in mainland Greece, while thousands of asylum seekers, refugees, and migrants are living under unsafe and degrading conditions at the camps on the Aegean islands and others in the main- land. They live mostly in overcrowded Reception and Identification Centers (RICs) and accommodation centers under deplorable conditions, the lack of proper shelter, the extremely unhygienic living conditions. Migrants, asylum seekers and refugees liv- ing in the RICs faced multiple challenges and vulnerabilities that must be considered when responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Keywords: migrants, refugees, asylum seekers, health, COVID-19, Greece. Riassunto. Alcuni casi di COVID-19 sono stati individuati nei centri di accoglienza della terraferma della Grecia, mentre migliaia di richiedenti asilo, profughi e migranti continuano a vivere in condizioni non salutari e degradanti nei campi delle isole egee e altri nella terraferma. Per lo più, essi vivono nei sovraffollati Centri di Identificazio- ne e di Recezione (RIC) e in centri di accoglienza in condizioni deplorevoli, senza un vero e proprio rifugio, in condizioni di vita estremamente non igieniche. I migranti, i richiedenti asilo e i profughi che vivono nei RIC devono far fronte a diverse sfide e vulnerabilità che devono essere prese in considerazione nel momento di affrontare la pandemia del COVID-19.
    [Show full text]