DOCSLIB.ORG

EUPAN German Presidency Report 01 July – 31 December 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EUPAN German Presidency Report 01 July – 31 December 2020 Berlin, 29 January 2021 EUPAN German Presidency Report 01 July – 31 December 2020 1. Summary The German Presidency in the second semester of 2020 took place under the impression of the ongoing Covid-19 crisis. Regrettably, as was the case already under the Croatian Presidency in the first semester, there could be no physical meetings. Instead of holding a plenary meeting on the Working Level, Working Level colleagues were asked to engage via e-mail. Two Secretariat meetings on both the Working and Directors General Level were held in the virtual sphere. The plenary EUPAN Directors General Meeting took place via videoconference on 17 November 2020. The meeting on 17 November saw the launch of a EUPAN Summer School whose first edition will be organised by Germany in the summer of 2021. Covering the topics of integrity, trust and professionalism, the first EUPAN Summer School will provide exchange, insight and knowledge on prerequisites and circumstances in administrative responsibilities. The Covid-19 pandemic gravely influenced not only the organisational part of the German Presidency, but also its focal points. To further the work and goals of EUPAN in the light of ongoing exceptional circumstances, the German Presidency endeavoured to collect knowledge acquired and experiences made by public administrations in handling the (first wave of the) pandemic. The questionnaire it composed aimed to render different approaches visible and, in the end, comparable. Submissions were collected in August and September of 2020. Most EUPAN partners invested considerable time and effort to describe their administration’s general setup and its adaptation to the challenges of the coronavirus. Many went to great lengths to explain their specific situation to the rest of the network. From those individual submissions, a comprehensive picture can be drawn – a picture which, regrettably, only illustrates the situation during the so-called first wave of the pandemic in the spring and summer of 2020. While many challenges remain unchanged during the second and, in many places, third wave of the pandemic, some coping mechanisms have evolved. The Directors General videoconference on 17 November allowed for a discussion of lessons learnt since the end of the survey. The Presidency Report presented today seeks to offer a quick and focused overview of the main activities during the German Presidency. For better orientation, the main documents are compiled in the annex to this report. Managing the EUPAN Presidency in a time of global crisis required the support, goodwill and flexibility of the EUPAN partners. Germany is especially indebted to the members of the EUPAN 5 group who offered close cooperation throughout the semester. The communal spirit integral to EUPAN could be preserved despite the fact that there were no physical meetings. Table of Contents 1. Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Covid-19 Questionnaire ................................................................................................................ 3 2.1. Setup ............................................................................................................................................. 3 2.2. Return ........................................................................................................................................... 3 2.3. Evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 4 2.4. Discussion .................................................................................................................................... 6 3. EUPAN Summer School ................................................................................................................ 7 3.1. Idea ................................................................................................................................................ 7 3.2. Decision of the Directors General ........................................................................................... 8 3.3. First Summer School in July 2021 ........................................................................................... 9 4. Miscellaneous Items ...................................................................................................................... 9 4.1. Publication “Public Administration in Germany” ................................................................ 9 4.2. Workshop “A Journey to an Inclusive Organsiation” ...................................................... 10 EUPAN German Presidency Report | Page 2 4.3. Initiative for a Ministerial Meeting ...................................................................................... 11 5. Annex.............................................................................................................................................. 11 2. Covid-19 Questionnaire One of the German Presidency’s two focal points, the other one being the launch of the EUPAN Summer School, was the realisation of a comprehensive Covid-19 survey among EUPAN Members and Observer States. 2.1. Setup Cf. Annex A: Covid-19 Questionnaire The main challenge in designing the questionnaire was to find the right angle: The German Presidency strived to develop questions that would generate input useful to the EUPAN partners. To make sure that the questionnaire did not go past their actual need the Presidency decided to ask the network to deliver feedback early on in the drafting process. A first draft of the questionnaire was circulated with the Welcome Letter of the German Presidency. The scope of this first draft was very wide. It was subsequently limited to take into account the feedback by EUPAN partners and to avoid overlaps with other surveys under way at the time. In the end, the questionnaire’s focus was sharpened to better reflect EUPAN’s specific public service scope. The emphasis was put on the collection of different experiences rather than the collection of numerical data. This way, the German Presidency hoped to create a vivid and instructive tableau of challenges and coping mechanisms across the continent. Seeing as no two administrations are set up in the same way, there can be no universal truths drawn from the survey. This was not the goal of the survey. Instead, the idea was to invite administrations to learn about their partners’ successes and challenges and to inspire them to maybe take a second look at their own measures. 2.2. Return Cf. Annex B: Covid-19 Questionnaire – Individual Replies by Country / Organisation EUPAN German Presidency Report | Page 3 Replies were received by 28 EUPAN Members and Observer States. The vast majority of EUPAN Members and Observers came back with comprehensive and thorough assessments of the situation in their administration. Many went to great lengths to explain how their administration’s structural setup influenced their handling of the situation, identifying both advantages and difficulties. 2.3. Evaluation The questionnaire encouraged the sharing of experiences and asked for the description of a country’s administrative framework outside of multiple choice boxes. This is why there can be no comprehensive evaluation of every reply in relation to the next in the form of a table. An insight into a country`s or the European Commission’s specific approach and into individual challenges encountered in the process is best achieved by referring directly to that country’s or the Commissions’s individual reply (cf. Annex B). However, reading the submissions as a whole yields some interesting observations. The so- called first wave was largely over at the time of completion of the questionnaire while the second, in many places even the third wave, is under way at the moment. As the situation progresses, it may be useful to reconsider certain approaches in the light of lessons learnt also by other administrations. It is important to note again, though, that there is no universal right or wrong in the context of Covid-19 measures. With innumerous variables in play, ranging from geographical and demographic factors to the particularities of national economies, no two administrations face the exact same challenges. That being said, the following observations warrant the reader’s special attention and maybe further consideration: Structural Information: o Asked to provide structural information on their administration, roughly three quarters of countries indicated that their Covid-19 crisis management had (mostly) happened on the central level. The remaining countries took Covid- EUPAN German Presidency Report | Page 4 19 measures on a central and regional level. In a few countries, all three levels, the central, regional and municipal, were responsible for decisions intended to contain the pandemic. o Irrespective of their individual organisational structure, all countries but one indicated that their division of competences had proven apt to deal with the unprecedented challenges of the Covid-19 crisis. o While there will be a certain bias with every administration deeming its own setup to be the best, it goes to show that there is no right and wrong organisational structure when it comes to a pandemic. Depending on the administration’s structural setup, challenges will differ. At different times during the pandemic, one system may seem preferable over another – but this can shift. Handling
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Central and Eastern Europe Development Outlook After the Coronavirus Pandemic
    CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK AFTER THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC Editor in Chief: Dr. Chen Xin Published by: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. Telephone: +36-1-5858-690 E-mail: [email protected] Webpage: www.china-cee.eu Address: 1052, Budapest, Petőfi Sándor utca 11. Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin ISSN: 978-615-6124-29-6 Cover design: PONT co.lab Copyright: China-CEE Institute Nonprofit Ltd. The reproduction of the study or parts of the study are prohibited. The findings of the study may only be cited if the source is acknowledged. Central and Eastern Europe Development Outlook after the Coronavirus Pandemic Chief Editor: Dr. Chen Xin CHINA-CEE INSTITUTE Budapest, October 2020 Content Preface ............................................................................................................ 5 Part I POLITICAL DEVELOPMENT OUTLOOK ..................................... 7 Albanian politics in post-pandemic era: reshuffling influence and preparing for the next elections .............................................................................................. 8 BiH political outlook after the COVID-19 pandemic ...................................... 13 Bulgarian Political Development Outlook in Post-Pandemic Era ..................... 18 Forecast of Croatian Political Events after the COVID-19 .............................. 25 Czech Political Outlook for the Post-Crisis Period .......................................... 30 Estonian political outlook after the pandemic: Are we there yet? ...................
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Recommendations for starting a safe school year 2020-2021, while promoting quality inclusive education for all children in Romania The opinions expressed in this document belong to the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position of UNICEF. Executive summary his document was created to support the national, county, and local authorities to plan the beginning of the school year 2020-2021 safely for children and for all the school staff, as well Tas to provide quality inclusive education throughout this unprecedented worldwide situation. The goal was to identify a set of solutions which may help reduce both the impact of the pandemic upon learning, and the gaps in terms of access to education after schools were closed from March to July 2020 in Romania. This material was drafted by a team of 18 principals involved in implementing the ”Quality inclusive education: transition from lower to upper secondary education” model, and by representatives of the county institutions in Bacău, at the initiative and coordinated by UNICEF Romania. The recommendations proposed are based on the three scenarios displayed by the Ministry of Education and Research, as well as on the experience acquired by the education experts from March until July 2020, under the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic. The solutions presented also show the outcomes of the consultations organized at a community level on topics such as challenges, vulnerabilities, constraints, and solutions specific to each and every scenario. Special attention was paid to vulnerable students and to those at risk of school drop-out . The considerations and the proposals submitted are equally looking at removing barriers for attending education, supporting learning and guaranteeing well-being for all students, as well as supplying the necessary support for teachers, school staff, and managerial teams, for them to be able to safely provide inclusive contexts and quality education services.
    [Show full text]
  • Rspg20-007 Final
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CONTENT AND TECHNOLOGY Electronic Communications Networks and Services Radio Spectrum Policy Group RSPG Secretariat Brussels, 5 February 2020 RSPG20-007 FINAL RADIO SPECTRUM POLICY GROUP 23rd Progress Report of the RSPG Sub-Group on cross-border coordination RSPG Secretariat, Avenue de Beaulieu 33, B-1160, Bruxelles, office BU33 7/55 Telephone: direct line (+32-2)29.21.261, switchboard 299.11.11; Fax: (+32.2)296.83.95 E-mail: [email protected] Web-site: http://www.rspg-spectrum.eu Web-site CIRCABC : https://circabc.europa.eu/w/browse/f5b44016-a8c5-4ef6-a0bf-bc8d357debcb RSPG20-007 FINAL 23rd Progress Report of the RSPG Sub-Group on cross-border coordination The Sub-Group has held one meeting, 21st January in Roma, at the kind invitation of the Italian administration. The list of participants is attached in annex 1. The detailed report of the meeting is attached in annex 2. TV, T-DAB and FM interference around Italy For the details of the interference situation, please refer to the meeting report in annex 2: • For TV interference, there is no more interference to channels in operation in neighbouring countries except with Croatia where some interference remains on 5 channels. All these channels being used by local broadcasters, interference will cease when these Italian broadcaster will switch off, in accordance with the migration plan. • For TDAB interference, AGCOM is requested by law to develop a T-DAB plan fully in line with Italian international rights (GE-06 + coordination agreements). However, this can be done only after successful results of ongoing negotiations which aimed to optimize the GE-06 initial plan taking into account that planning was sometimes based on allotments and on DTV rather than DAB.
    [Show full text]
  • Lily Charlott Birkholm
    Cand.ling.merc. - Europæiske studier og tysk 77 sider (113 sider inkl. litteraturliste og bilag) / 174.394 anslag Kandidatafhandling 20. august 2015 VIND I ØSTEUROPA En analyse af det rumænske vindenergimarked, og om det er gunstigt for Vestas at etablere en produktionsenhed i Rumænien Lily Charlott Birkholm Vejleder: Lars Abel Osteuropäischer Wind - eine Untersuchung der Expansionsmöglichkeiten für Vestas in Rumänien Rumänien ist eines der Länder der ehemaligen Sowjetunion, das große Anstrengungen unternommen hat, um das Erbe des Kommunismus zu überwinden. Obwohl die Aussicht auf eine EU-Mitgliedschaft zu Reformen anregte, wurde die Aufnahme durch eine träge und undurchsichtige Verwaltung, politische Unruhen und Korruption verzögert. Dies hat sogleich die Bedingungen für die Einwohner und privaten Unternehmen erschwert. Auch im Energie- und Umweltbereich ist Rumänien lange rückständig gewesen und hat deshalb große Probleme mit der Umweltverschmutzung, die hauptsächlich auf die jahrzehntelange Verwendung von Kohle zurückzuführen sind. Aus diesem Grund ist die Nachfrage nach Umwelttechnik in Rumänien in den letzen zehn Jahren gestiegen. Es gibt in Rumänien seit langem ein wachsendes Interesse an der Windindustrie, und dieses hat zu einem großen Windturbinenexport ins Land geführt. Der weltweit operierende dänische Hersteller von Windkraftanlagen, Vestas Wind Systems, hat dort Aufträge erhalten, und dieses sollte weiterverfolgt werden. Aber Vestas befindet sich im starken Wettbewerb mit anderen Produzenten von Windkraftanlagen, die alle
    [Show full text]
  • Bucharest City Report Q2 2020
    City Report Q2 2020 COPYRIGHT © JONES LANG LASALLE IP, INC. 2019 The Bridge, Bucharest Romania during the COVID-19 pandemic 59,273 €223.6 bn. -1.9% COVID-19 cases reported 2020 GDP 2020 Real GDP growth rate as of August 7th April 2020 forecast of the April 2020 forecast of the National Commission for National Commission for Strategy and Prognosis Strategy and Prognosis 102,830 463,000 Furloughed employment Total unemployed contracts July 3rd 2020 May 2020 Macroeconomic overview The COVID-19 crisis continued worldwide during Q2 and Romania made no exception. The economic impact was seen in a drastic reduction of GDP growth prognosis. There are different estimates issued by several institutions (ranging from -6% to 0.3%), all showing decreases from previous estimates, however two showing also a quick recovery in 2021 (3.9% or 4.2%, depending on the source). In April 2020, the National Commission for Strategy and Prognosis forecasted a -1.9% real GDP growth rate for 2020, compared to 4.1% at the beginning of the year. The latest prognosis issued by the World Bank estimated the country’s economic growth for 2020 to -5.7%, from an initial 3.8% at the start of the year. This is to be followed by a 5.4% growth rate in 2021. The International Monetary Fund expects Romania’s real GDP growth rate to fall to -5% in 2020, from 3.5%, as estimated in October 2019. However, the IMF also predicts that a 3.9% economic growth will follow in 2021. The EU Commission’s Summer 2020 Economic Forecast, released in July, estimates for Romania a GDP contraction of -6% in 2020 (from 3.6% in the Autumn forecast), followed by a 4% recovery in 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • Demography of Europe
    Demography of Europe STATISTICS VISUALISED 2021 edition 1 Demographic statistics are among the most popular data Eurostat produces, and they are important for almost every area of policy. This new interactive publication Demography of Europe produced by Eurostat aims to bring these statistics to a new audience, providing clear visualisations and interactive features to help non-specialist users see what official European statistics can tell us about how the population is developing, ageing, and much more. As Vice-president of the European Commission, Dubravka Šuica, says: “The data presented in this publication will help us analyse the reasons behind the multi-facetted demographic trends across the European Union, because not every Member State is affected in the same way. This publication is another key building block for our demography portfolio, it confirms demography as a catalyst for the development and the success of our policies.” As Commissioner for Economy of the European Commission, Paolo Gentiloni, says: “Demographic change in the European Union is a key policy topic for this Commission. The pandemic has reiterated how important it is that our policies resonate with people and protect them. What distinguishes this new Eurostat publication is its simple and interactive way of bringing information about European demography to our citizens.” Data in this edition of the publication show yearly figures up until 2019 or 2020 and in some cases 1 January 2021. Where applicable, the impact of the COVID-19 crisis is commented on. The publication is divided into four parts: Population structure presents the trend of the total population since the start of the millennium.
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic the Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 in FOCUS
    Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 IN FOCUS The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic Key facts and findings • The COVID-19 pandemic arrived in a largely the pandemic that are concerning from a democracy democratic Europe. Only 4 countries in the region standpoint. (10 per cent) are not democracies, while many of the democracies are high performing. • The main democratic challenges caused by the pandemic in Europe pertain to the disruption of • Democracy in Europe, however, has in recent years electoral cycles, curtailment of civil liberties, the experienced erosion and backsliding. More than use of contact tracing apps, the increase in gender half of European democracies have eroded in the inequality and domestic violence, risks to vulnerable last 5 years. In particular, 3 countries—Hungary, groups, executive aggrandizement, protest waves, Poland and Serbia—have registered a more severe corruption cases and challenges in the relationship form of erosion, called democratic backsliding, with between local and national governance. Hungary regressing on its democratic standards for the past 14 years. • Europe’s democracies have mostly showed resilience, and opportunities for furthering the • The pandemic has intensified these pre-existing integrity of elections, for digitalization and for concerns. The 3 backsliding countries in Europe innovative social protests have arisen. have implemented a number of measures to curb 1 Taking Stock of Regional Democratic Trends in Europe Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Global State of Democracy Special Brief, January 2021 IN FOCUS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Blog: What to Expect from Sunday's Legislative Elections in Romania
    LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog: What to expect from Sunday’s legislative elections in Romania Page 1 of 3 What to expect from Sunday’s legislative elections in Romania Romania will hold legislative elections on 6 December. Sergiu Gherghina previews the vote, writing that while the ruling National Liberal Party is likely to stay in power, the elections will represent a number of firsts for the country. Romanians will go to the polls this Sunday, the fourth time they have been called to vote in an election in a little over 18 months. This time, it will be legislative elections on the ballot, following presidential and European elections in 2019, and local elections earlier this year. The previous three elections demonstrated a consistent pattern that is unlikely to change in the forthcoming legislative elections. The ruling National Liberal Party (PNL), which currently holds power in a minority government, will continue their term in office, but with the possibility of strengthening their position. Three novelties for Romanian politics The 6 December elections will nevertheless bring several novelties to the Romanian political arena. It will be the first time in more than two decades that the Social Democratic Party (PSD) will not be in pole position to win the popular vote. This is underlined by the fact the PNL secured the largest vote share at last year’s European elections, won the 2019 presidential election, and defeated the PSD in the 2020 local elections. Although the social democrats placed second in all three of these contests, the party is facing a battle to maintain this position in the face of strong competition from a recently formed electoral alliance between the Save Romania Union (USR) and the Freedom, Unity and Solidarity Party (PLUS).
    [Show full text]
  • E-Voting Protocols in Context of COVID19
    E-voting protocols in context of COVID19 Sfîrnaciuc Emilia∗ Vasilescu Miruna-Elena† Simion Emil‡ Abstract Electronic voting consists of the methods that use an electronic system in the pro- cess of recording, counting or transmitting votes. It is relatively a new concept used in the democratic processes and especially in the context of COVID19. It’s aim is to reduce errors and to improve the integrity of the election process. In this paper, we provide a review of the existing systems used in Europe. Initially, we mention the factors that influence the adoption of such systems at a large scale. We further describe the systems used in Russia (Moscow’s primary) and in Romania (for counting the ballots). These systems are analyzed in order to find out if they respect technical challenges such as verifiability, dependability, security, anonymity and trust. Keywords: e-voting, encryption, cryptanalysis, Blockchain, El-Gamal cryptosystem, Mu-Varadharajan system 1 Introduction One of the main topics in today’s society and especially in the Computer Science field is the use of electronic voting systems. These systems play a decisive role in democratic organizations and represent a relatively new technology that helps voters register their ballots in elections, using computerized systems. Electronic voting means the methods that use an electronic system connected to the Internet in the process of recording, counting or transmitting votes. It can be used both for elections for political functions, as well as for democratic decisions and public opinion polls. Since the publication of the first cryptographic protocol with applicability in electronic elections (Chaum , 1981 and 1982), numerous solutions have appeared in the academic environment to deal with security issues in this field.
    [Show full text]
  • Property Index Overview of European Residential Markets 10 Th Edition, July 2021 Property Index | 10Th Edition, July 2021 Property Index | 10Th Edition, July 2021
    Property Index Overview of European Residential Markets 10 th edition, July 2021 Property Index | 10th edition, July 2021 Property Index | 10th edition, July 2021 Introduction Introduction 3 We are pleased to present you this 10th anniversary edition of the Property Index, Overview of European Residential Highlights 5 Markets. During more than a decade, Property Index has become one of the most influential publications on residential Impacts of the Coronavirus Pandemic real estate markets in Europe and has proven to be a valuable on Residential Real Estate Markets 6 source of information for professionals, institutions and general public. Economy outlook – recovery from COVID recession begins 10 Property index analyses factors shaping the residential markets together with their development and compares Comparison of Residential Markets – residential property prices across selected European countries Housing Development Intensity 12 and cities. Comparison of Residential Property Prices The publication aims to provide you with European residential in Selected Countries and Cities 16 market data on a regular basis and to answer questions on how Europeans live and at what costs. Mortgage Markets in Europe 32 Despite the fact that the aim of this publication is to provide Annex: a complex overview of the past year’s development on Comments on Residential Markets 34 residential markets in European countries, we could not ignore the current ongoing situation caused by the coronavirus Contacts 47 pandemic outbreak in 2020 that still dominates in the public Authors 48 debate even today. We hope you will find this edition of Property index interesting and that it will provide you with insights and information you need.
    [Show full text]
  • Romania Political Briefing: Outlook for 2020: a Coalition Government Who Has to Deal with the Pandemics Oana Cristina Popovici
    ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 36, No. 1 (RO) January 2021 Romania political briefing: Outlook for 2020: a coalition Government who has to deal with the pandemics Oana Cristina Popovici 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: CHen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Outlook for 2020: a coalition Government who has to deal with the pandemics 2021 started with a new liberal Government, representing a coalition formed by three parties which managed to impose the majority in the new Parliament, elected in December 2020. The probability of populist measures, meant to further affect the budget deficit, is reduced, but the Government has to deal with several major problems this year: first of all, the adoption of the state budget; secondly, the relaunch of the economy while continuing to handle the COVID-19 pandemics and the vaccination campaign and finally, drawing the Resilience and Recovery Plan for absorbing the European Union’s funds. The end of 2020 in Romania was marked out by the elections for the National Parliament, whose results were meant to shape the new political environment. The results were in the favour of the Social Democrat Party, which gathered almost 29% of the total number of votes, followed by the National Liberal Party (NLP) with over 25% and the Union Save Romania (USR) and PLUS alliance, with over 15%. The results were not the expected ones for NLP, which was the main favourite to win the election, according to the opinion pools.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Market Reactions to the Political Uncertainty. Study Case: Romania
    “Ovidius” University Annals, Economic Sciences Series Volume XX, Issue 2 /2020 Financial Market Reactions to the Political Uncertainty. Study Case: Romania Luciana Simion Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Doctoral School of Economics and International Business, Romania [email protected] Georgiana-Loredana Schipor “Ovidius” University of Constanta, Faculty of Economic Sciences, Romania [email protected] Abstract The goal of this paper is to identify the influence of the economic policy and political uncertainty on the Romania stock market. We used the Bollinger Bands set at two standard deviations and Bollinger Bandwidth Indicator in order to emphasize volatility. By applying technical indicators on the BET-XT index between 2018 – 2020, the findings show that political uncertainty influences the index evolution. Our study shows that the magnitude of the impact of policy measures is stronger than the impact of events such as presidential, local or European parliamentary elections, cabinet formation and dissolution. The study reveals an asymmetry of the index volatility, in the sense that unexpected “shock” type events with negative impact determined a much higher volatility. The SPSS analysis reveals the indirect correlation between the number of COVID-19 daily registered cases in Romania, as major panic factor at the beginning of the pandemic, and the BET-XT evolution. Key words: political uncertainty, volatility, financial market, BET-XT J.E.L. classification: G10, G14, G18 1. Introduction In this paper, we focus on the effects of political uncertainty on the Romanian financial market, considering the major political events that have dominated the period 2018-2020, including the supporting measures of the authorities to decelerate the COVID-19 pandemic influence to some activity sectors.
    [Show full text]