DOCSLIB.ORG

Case No COMP/M.7252 - HOLCIM / LAFARGE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Case No COMP/M.7252 - HOLCIM / LAFARGE EN Case No COMP/M.7252 - HOLCIM / LAFARGE Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) in conjunction with Art 6(2) Date: 15/12/2014 In electronic form on the EUR-Lex website under document number 32014M7252 Office for Publications of the European Union L-2985 Luxembourg EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 15.12.2014 C(2014) 9962 final In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted PUBLIC VERSION pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general MERGER PROCEDURE description. To the notifying party Commission européenne, B-1049 Bruxelles / Europese Commissie, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium. Telephone: (32-2) 299 11 11. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE PARTIES............................................................................................................6 II. THE OPERATION......................................................................................................6 III. EU DIMENSION ........................................................................................................6 IV. OVERVIEW OF PRODUCTS AND THE PARTIES' ACTIVITIES ........................7 IV.1. Overview of the building materials industry.....................................................7 IV.2. The Parties' activities.......................................................................................10 V. ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK ..............................................................................12 V.1. Analytical framework – non-coordinated and coordinated effects .................13 V.2. Analytical framework – vertical relationships ................................................14 VI. MARKET DEFINITION AND COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT...........................14 VI.1. Grey cement.....................................................................................................15 VI.1.1. Relevant product market definition...................................................15 VI.1.1.1. Past decisional practice......................................................15 VI.1.1.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................15 VI.1.1.3. Responses to the market investigation ..............................15 VI.1.1.4. Conclusion on the relevant product market.......................16 VI.1.2. Relevant geographic market definition .............................................16 VI.1.2.1. Past decisional practice......................................................16 VI.1.2.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................17 VI.1.2.3. Responses to the market investigation and the Commission’s assessment .................................................17 VI.1.2.4. Conclusion on the relevant geographic markets................18 VI.1.3. Competitive assessment.....................................................................18 VI.1.3.1. Methodology for the calculation of market shares............19 VI.1.3.2. Austria ...............................................................................21 VI.1.3.3. Bulgaria .............................................................................23 VI.1.3.4. Croatia ...............................................................................24 VI.1.3.5. Czech Republic..................................................................29 VI.1.3.6. France (Métropole)............................................................32 VI.1.3.7. France (Réunion)...............................................................45 VI.1.3.8. Germany ............................................................................47 VI.1.3.9. Hungary .............................................................................48 VI.1.3.10. Romania.........................................................................48 VI.1.3.11. Slovakia .........................................................................48 VI.1.3.12. Spain ..............................................................................48 VI.1.3.13. United Kingdom ............................................................48 VI.1.4. Conclusion on grey cement ...............................................................48 VI.2. READY-MIX CONCRETE ............................................................................48 VI.2.1. Relevant product market definition...................................................48 VI.2.1.1. Past decisional practice......................................................48 2 VI.2.1.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................48 VI.2.1.3. Responses to the market investigation ..............................48 VI.2.1.4. Conclusion on the relevant product market.......................48 VI.2.2. Relevant geographic market definition .............................................48 VI.2.2.1. Past decisional practice......................................................48 VI.2.2.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................48 VI.2.2.3. Responses to the market investigation ..............................48 VI.2.2.4. Conclusion on the relevant geographic market .................48 VI.2.3. Competitive assessment.....................................................................48 VI.2.3.1. Methodology for the calculation of market shares............48 VI.2.3.2. France (Métropole)............................................................48 VI.2.3.3. France (Réunion)...............................................................48 VI.2.3.4. Romania.............................................................................48 VI.2.3.5. United Kingdom ................................................................48 VI.2.3.6. Spain..................................................................................48 VI.2.3.7. Germany and Poland .........................................................48 VI.2.4. Substantial part of the internal market...............................................48 VI.2.5. Conclusion on RMX..........................................................................48 VI.3. Aggregates.......................................................................................................48 VI.3.1. Relevant product market definition...................................................48 VI.3.1.1. Past decisional practice......................................................48 VI.3.1.2. The Notifying Party’s arguments ......................................48 VI.3.1.3. Responses to the market investigation ..............................48 VI.3.1.4. Conclusion on product market definition..........................48 VI.3.2. Relevant geographic market definition .............................................48 VI.3.2.1. Past decisional practice......................................................48 VI.3.2.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................48 VI.3.2.3. Responses to the market investigation ..............................48 VI.3.2.4. Conclusion on geographic market definition ....................48 VI.3.3. Competitive assessment.....................................................................48 VI.3.3.1. The Parties' activities.........................................................48 VI.3.3.2. Methodology for the calculation of market shares............48 VI.3.3.3. France (Métropole)............................................................48 VI.3.3.4. Réunion .............................................................................48 VI.3.3.5. Romania.............................................................................48 VI.3.3.6. United Kingdom ................................................................48 VI.3.3.7. Belgian/French border region, German/Polish/Czech border region, Hungarian/Slovakian border region and Spain..................................................................................48 VI.3.4. Substantial part of the internal market...............................................48 VI.3.5. Conclusion on aggregates..................................................................48 VI.4. Asphalt 48 VI.4.1. Relevant product market definitions .................................................48 3 VI.4.1.1. Past decisional practice......................................................48 VI.4.1.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................48 VI.4.1.3. Conclusion on the relevant product market.......................48 VI.4.2. Relevant geographic market definitions............................................48 VI.4.2.1. Past decisional practice......................................................48 VI.4.2.2. The Notifying Party's arguments.......................................48 VI.4.2.3. Responses to the market investigation ..............................48 VI.4.2.4. Conclusion on the relevant geographic market .................48 VI.4.3. Competitive assessment.....................................................................48 VI.4.4. Substantial part of the internal market...............................................48 VI.4.5. Conclusion on asphalt........................................................................48 VI.5. Contract surfacing ...........................................................................................48 VI.5.1. Relevant product market definition...................................................48
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The UK's Largest Event Dedicated to the Design & Construction of Schools
    2010 The UK’s largest event dedicated to the design & construction of schools MeetMeet the the project project leaders leaders School design is key to pupil PAGE 5 success, say headteachers PAGE 8 Over FREE! Headteachers seminar theatre PAGE 4 300 exhibitors! Keynote addresses from: Lord Puttnam, Paul Finch, CABE, Tim Byles, PfS and Baroness Morris of Yardley, PAGE 2-3 Panel discussions with: Barry Sheerman MP, Judith Bennett, National Governors’ Association Malcolm Trobe, Association of School and And lots College Leaders PAGE 2-3 more! Book your place today at: buildingschools.co.uk Platinum sponsors Gold sponsors Event partners Media partners pantone 349 Conference programme on the experience of two award winning local authorities and their schools and partners. Speakers will include: BSEC 2010 includes a two-day Chair: Nina Woodcock, head of capital programmes, Becta paid for conference Steve Moss, strategic director for ICT, Partnerships for Schools Penny Patterson, senior inspector ICT futures, London Borough of Havering Marcus Orlovsky, founder member and director, The BSEC conference runs over two days Richard Ayre, vice principal, Brittons School and Bryanston Square and attracts almost 1,000 delegates. The Technology College, Havering Thoughts of a former headteacher latest programme is detailed below: James Grant, Sheffield BSF manager, Civica Glynis Gower, former headteacher of Penistone Grammar School & educationalist with BAM PPP 3. Sustainability 12.40 – 13.40 Lunch and exhibition viewing By next February the DCSF Zero Carbon [Schools] Task Force will make significant 13.40 Panel: Schools capital programmes for Day one announcements impacting contractors. Attend the future this session to discover the requirements, and Wednesday 24 February Gain insight on what future government means to achieve them through the award policy could mean for the nature of future winning Acharacle primary school.
    [Show full text]
  • LPPA Statement of Consultation 25.06.13
    Ashfield District Council Local Plan Statement of Consultation July 2013 Ashfield District Council - Statement of Consultation Contents 1. Introduction 2. Statutes and Regulations 3. Duty to Co-Operate 4. Ashfield Local Development Framework Consultations 5. Ashfield Local Plan 2010-2023 Preferred Approach Consultation • Form of Consultation • Summary of Responses • Key changes made to the Local Plan Appendices Appendix One: Ashfield Local Plan 2010-2023 Preferred Approach Consultation. Summary of responses, the Council response to issues raised and proposed changes to the Local Plan. Appendix Two: List of bodies and persons invited to make representations Appendix Three: List of Respondents 1 Ashfield District Council - Statement of Consultation Introduction 1.1 This Statement of Consultation sets out the details of publicity and consultation undertaken to prepare and inform the Ashfield District Council Local Plan. This Statement fulfils the requirements of Regulation 22 (1)c of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 to prepare a statement setting out how the Local Planning Authority (LPA) has complied with Regulation 18 of the same Regulations in preparation of the Local Plan. 1.2 The purpose of this Statement is to describe the consultations undertaken at each of the previous stages of the preparation of the Local Plan. The Statement summarises which bodies and persons were invited to make representations up to and including the most recent, Preferred Approach stage, how they were invited to do this, a summary of the main issues raised and how they have been taken into account by the Council. 1.3 Previous public consultations took place in relation to the review of the Ashfield Local Plan (2002) as part of the ‘Local Development Framework’ (LDF) process, following the national guidance of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Lafargeholcim CDP Climate Change 2020
    LafargeHolcim Ltd - Climate Change 2020 C0. Introduction C0.1 (C0.1) Give a general description and introduction to your organization. Company Profile LafargeHolcim is the global leader in building materials and solutions. It is active in four business segments: Cement, Aggregates, Ready-Mix Concrete, and Solutions and Products. It was founded in mid-2015 following the merger of Lafarge S.A and Holcim Ltd. The Group has a presence in around 80 countries and has over 70 000 employees. In 2019 it recorded CHF 26.7 bn in net sales and has 286 mt of annual cement production capacity worldwide. The Group has over 2,300 plants (including over 1,400 in ready mix concrete, 649 in aggregates and 264 in cement and grinding plants). The Group has solutions and services in cement, concrete, and aggregates for the following businesses: buildings, infrastructure, distribution, oil and gas, affordable housing, and construction systems. Cement is manufactured through a large-scale, capital-and-energy-intensive process. At the core of the production process is a rotary kiln, in which limestone and clay are heated to approximately 1,450 degrees Celsius. The semi-finished product, clinker, is created by sintering. In the cement mill, gypsum is added to the clinker and the mixture is ground to a fine powder – traditional Portland cement. Other high-grade materials such as granulated blast furnace slag, fly ash, pozzolan, and limestone can be added in order to modify the properties of the cement for special uses or specific application. Aggregates include crushed stone, gravel, and sand. They can also be recycled from concrete wastes.
    [Show full text]
  • Industrial Minerals Quarries and Manufactures Many of the Key
    Industrial Minerals Industrial Minerals quarries and manufactures many of the key products required in road building including crushed rock and asphalt Industrial Minerals Financial highlights &)6%9%!25.$%2,9).'%!2.).'3 /0%2!4).'-!2'). 4!2-!#/0%2!4).'02/&)4 M "902/$5#4 !GGREGATES !SPHALT 2EADYMIXEDCONCRETE #EMENT ,IME -ORTAR #ONCRETEPRODUCTS /THER 3(!2%/&'2/50 3(!2%/&'2/50 /0%2!4).'02/&)4 .%4/0%2!4).'!33%43 /NACONTINUINGBASISFORAND /NACONTINUINGBASISFORAND HASBEENRESTATEDTOREFLECTTHEADOPTION OF54)&ABSTRACT!CCOUNTINGFOR%3/0TRUSTS In 2007, Copebrás and Yang Quarry were reclassified from Industrial Minerals to Base Metals and Coal respectively, to align with internal management reporting. As such, the 2007 and 2006 data has been reclassified for the Yang Quarry results and all data has been reclassified for the Copebrás results. 94 | Anglo American plc Fact Book 2007/8 Industrial Minerals Financial data US$m 2007(1) 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 Turnover Subsidiaries 4,581 3,961 3,754 3,571 3,007 2,689 Joint Ventures – – – – 100 76 Associates 10 17 30 25 22 25 Total turnover 4,591 3,978 3,784 3,596 3,129 2,790 EBITDA 732 539 570 556 510 437 Depreciation and amortisation 258 222 229 201 220 184 Operating profit before special items and remeasurements 474 317 341 355 290 253 Operating special items and remeasurements (67) (269) (16) (9) – – Operating profit after special items and remeasurements 407 48 325 346 290 253 Net interest, tax and minority interests (90) (56) (69) (103) (34) (39) Underlying earnings 384 261 256 259 256 214 Net segments assets 4,509 4,185 3,839 4,345 4,213 3,784 Capital expenditure 352 383 271 278 298 262 (1) In 2007, Copebrás and Yang Quarry were reclassified from Industrial Minerals to Base Metals and Coal respectively, to align with internal management reporting.
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGING LANDSCAPES REPORT to SOCIETY 2005 Tarmac Artwork2.Qxd 24/2/06 3:28 Pm Page 2
    Tarmac artwork2.qxd 24/2/06 3:28 pm Page 1 ® CHANGING LANDSCAPES REPORT TO SOCIETY 2005 Tarmac artwork2.qxd 24/2/06 3:28 pm Page 2 BIODIVERSITY HEALTH & SAFETY WATER USE COMMUNITY & EDUCATION CASE REPORT 1 04 - 05 CASE REPORT 2 06 - 07 CASE REPORT 3 08 - 09 CASE REPORT 4 10 - 11 A look at some of the In 2005 Tarmac invested Our new ‘reservoir Tarmac’s Millennium many ways in which we heavily in new equipment pavement’ technology – Eco-Centre near Wrexham are helping to encourage and devised innovative ways Tarmac Aquifa™ – is set to is helping to promote biodiversity and restore of working to ensure that reduce the risk and costs of sustainable living and natural habitats across hand arm vibration doesn’t flash flooding through its raise awareness of the UK. compromise the health of environmentally friendly environmental issues across our workforce. drainage system. the wider community. Tarmac artwork2.qxd 24/2/06 3:28 pm Page 3 CONTENTS WELCOME TO TARMAC’S REPORT TO SOCIETY FOR 2005. AS A BUSINESS, WE INTRODUCTION 01 PLAY AN ESSENTIAL ROLE IN PROVIDING ABOUT TARMAC 02 - 03 SOCIETY WITH THE RAW CONSTRUCTION CASE REPORT 1 04 - 05 MATERIALS WHICH MAKE UP THE FABRIC CASE REPORT 2 06 - 07 OF OUR DAILY LIVES. CASE REPORT 3 08 - 09 CASE REPORT 4 10 - 11 As well as our commercial considerations, we are guided by a strong sense of responsibility for the health and safety of our SAFETY 12 - 14 employees, for the environment and for the communities we HEALTH 15 - 16 work in and society as a whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Mergers: Commission Approves Acquisition of Certain Lafarge And
    European Commission - Press release Mergers: Commission approves acquisition of certain Lafarge and Holcim assets by CRH Brussels, 24 April 2015 The European Commission has cleared under the EU Merger Regulation the proposed acquisition of several assets of Holcim of Switzerland and of Lafarge of France by Irish building materials manufacturer CRH. The Commission concluded that the transaction would raise no competition concerns, in particular because the merged entity will continue to face sufficiently strong competition after the merger and customers will have alternative suppliers in all markets concerned. The proposed transaction concerns assets worth several billion euros which Holcim and Lafarge committed to divest to gain the Commission clearance of their merger in December 2014. CRH's activities overlap with the divested businesses in a number of areas, such as cement, aggregates, ready-mix concrete and asphalt. As most of these materials are sold within a short distance from the site where they are manufactured, the Commission focussed its assessment on the impact of the merger on customers located near the production facilities of CRH and of the divested assets. The Commission's investigation focused on the effects of the merger on competition for grey cement in three areas, namely (i) the cross border region between Poland and Slovakia, (ii) the cross border region between France and Belgium, and (iii) the United Kingdom. The Commission also looked at the competitive landscape for ready-mix concrete, cementitious materials, aggregates and asphalt in several regions of the European Economic Area (EEA). In the United Kingdom, the Commission assessed in particular overlaps in South Wales and Scotland and concluded that the merged entity will continue to face competition from major integrated players, such as Hanson (HeidelbergCement), Cemex, Hope, and LafargeHolcim, as well as from importers.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarmac Building Products Limited S172 Statement
    Tarmac Building Products Limited Section 172(1) statement The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 (the “Regulations”) have been in force with effect from 1 January 2019. The Regulations aim to extend sustainable and responsible governance practice beyond listed companies to private limited companies. Amongst other things, the Regulations require Tarmac Building Products Limited (the “Company”) to report how the directors of the Company have considered their duties under section 172 (of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”)) (“Section 172”), to promote the success of the Company, during the reporting period. The principal activity of the Company’s business is that of the provision of building materials across the UK and its activities and purpose frame the board’s approach to governance. The Company is part of the Tarmac sub-group of companies in the UK and is ultimately owned by CRH plc (“CRH”). CRH and its subsidiaries are referred to as the Group. In the management of its subsidiaries, the Group defines the measurement of success as long term value creation for the benefit of both the immediate entity and the wider Group with consideration to the Company's immediate stakeholders and those of the Group also. The Group recognises the need to have appropriate levels of governance across its subsidiaries as part of its approach to risk mitigation and wider stakeholder engagement strategy. The Group maintains strong levels of governance at both an enterprise wide and legal entity level, and as a result of increased regulation, CRH and its UK subsidiary boards recognise the need to move to a more structured approach and formalise key governance standards across its UK subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Agenda Item: 07 LIST of APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
    Agenda Item: 07 LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS Period for Report: 1 February 2020 – 31 March 2020 EASTERN QUARRY: Application Reference: EDC/20/0005 Decision Date: 12 February 2020 Location: Parcels B & C Castle Hill, Eastern Quarry, Watling Street, Swanscombe, Kent Applicant: Taylor Wimpey Proposal: Application for the partial discharge of condition 4 attached to planning permission reference no. EDC/19/0090 relating to Building Regulations part M4(2) compliance. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Condition Discharged Application Reference: EDC/19/0211 Decision Date: 04 March 2020 Location: Eastern Quarry - Phase 5 - Site L, Watling Street, Swanscombe, Kent Applicant: Chartway Group Proposal: Application for a non-material amendment to Reserved Matters approval reference EDC/17/0148 for the minor modification to the location and quantum of external lighting within the site. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions Application Reference: EDC/19/0210 Decision Date: 04 March 2020 Location: Eastern Quarry - Phase 5 - Site I, Watling Street, Swanscombe, Kent Applicant: Chartway Group Proposal: Application for a non-material amendment to planning permission EDC/17/0064, to allow modification to the location, quantum and refinement of external lighting. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions 1 Application Reference: EDC/20/0009 Decision Date: 13 March 2020 Location: Castle Hill Neighbourhood Area, Cherry Orchard, Castle Hill, Ebbsfleet Valley, Kent Applicant: David Lock Associates Proposal: Change of Use of Unit 3 from A1, A2, A3, A5 to A1, A2, A3, D1. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions Application Reference: EDC/19/0103 Decision Date: 17 March 2020 Location: Redundant Buildings Eastern Quarry Watling Street Swanscombe Kent Applicant: Erith Contractors Ltd Proposal: Temporary change of use of land for use as a construction compound for the production of ready mixed concrete including the installation of associated plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Number 67 September 2015
    Number 67 September 2015 The Russell Society is a society of amateur and professional mineralogists which encourages the study, recording and conservation of mineralogical sites and material. Registered Charity No. 803308 The Russell Society Website www.russellsoc.org So Much From So Few Clicks! The Russell Society Website has been changed & updated. Be sure to check it out! RUSSELL SOCIETY NEWSLETTER Russell Society Newsletter Number 67 September 2015 CONTENTS: Page No Society Health and Safety Policy ......................................................................... 2 Editorial ................................................................................................................... 3 From the President ................................................................................................ 4 Society Notices Obituary: Dr. James (“Jamie”) Bowman Nelson ..................................... 5 Your Society Needs You! Vacancy for Honorary Treasurer.................... 6 Your Society Needs You! New Journal Manager Required .................. 7 Your Society Needs You! Conservation Officer Vacancy ..................... 8 The Russell Society Library: Quo vadis .................................................. 9 Russell Society publications: Permissions .............................................. 9 The 2015 “Maisemore Event”: Don’t Miss It!............................................ 10 Gift Aid - Money for Nothing? .................................................................... 10 The New Russell Society Website
    [Show full text]
  • Case M.8533 – HEIDELBERGCEMENT / SCHWENK / READYMIX HUNGARY
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Competition Case M.8533 – HEIDELBERGCEMENT / SCHWENK / READYMIX HUNGARY Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 4(4) Date: 11.7.2017 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.7.2017 C(2017) 5011 final In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to PUBLIC VERSION Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. To the notifying parties To the Hungarian Competition Authority Subject: Case M.8533 – HEIDELBERGCEMENT / SCHWENK / READYMIX HUNGARY Commission decision following a reasoned submission pursuant to Article 4(4) of Regulation No 139/20041 for referral of the case to Hungary and Article 57 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area2. Date of filing: 20 June 2017 Legal deadline for response of Member States: 11 July 2017 Legal deadline for the Commission decision under Article 4(4): 26 July 2017 Dear Sir or Madam, I. INTRODUCTION (1) On 20 June 2017, the Commission received by means of a Reasoned Submission a referral request pursuant to Article 4(4) of the Merger Regulation with respect to the concentration cited above. HeidelbergCement AG and Schwenk Zement KG request the concentration to be examined in its entirety by Hungary. 1 OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1 (the 'Merger Regulation'). With effect from 1 December 2009, the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union ('TFEU') has introduced certain changes, such as the replacement of 'Community' by 'Union' and 'common market' by 'internal market'.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarmac Aggregates Limited S172 Statement
    Tarmac Aggregates Limited Section 172(1) statement The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 (the “Regulations”) have been in force with effect from 1 January 2019. The Regulations aim to extend sustainable and responsible governance practice beyond listed companies to private limited companies. Amongst other things, the Regulations require Tarmac Aggregates Limited (the “Company”) to report how the directors of the Company have considered their duties under section 172 (of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”)) (“Section 172”), to promote the success of the Company, during the reporting period. The principal activities of the Company’s business are: • Aggregates and Asphalt: the quarrying and supply of sand, gravel and stone and the manufacture of road surfacing materials; and • Readymix: the manufacture and supply of ready mixed concrete. (together, the “Principal Activities”). The Company is part of the Tarmac sub-group of companies in the UK (Tarmac) and is ultimately owned by CRH plc (“CRH”). CRH and its subsidiaries are referred to as the Group. In the management of its subsidiaries, the Group defines the measurement of success as long term value creation for the benefit of both the immediate entity and the wider Group with consideration to the Company's immediate stakeholders and those of the Group also. The Group recognises the need to have appropriate levels of governance across its subsidiaries as part of its approach to risk mitigation and wider stakeholder engagement strategy. The Group maintains strong levels of governance at both an enterprise wide and legal entity level, and as a result of increased regulation, CRH and its UK subsidiary boards recognise the need to move to a more structured approach and formalise key governance standards across its UK subsidiaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Epoc 2014 European Powers of Construction
    EPoC 2014 European Powers of Construction June 2015 EPoC is an annual publication produced by Deloitte and distributed free of charge Director Javier Parada, partner in charge of the Infrastructure Industry, Spain Coordinated by Margarita Velasco Martín Alurralde Serra Beltrán Fernández de Pinedo Published by CIBS Contact Infrastructure Department, Deloitte Madrid Plaza Pablo Ruiz Picasso, S/N Torre Picasso 28020 Madrid, Spain Phone + 34 91 514 50 00 Fax + 34 91 514 51 80 June 2015 Contents 4 Introduction 5 Ranking of listed European construction companies 6 Top 50 EPoC – ranking by sales 7 Top 20 EPoC – ranking by market capitalisation 8 Outlook for the construction industry in the EU 13 Top 20 EPoC strategies: internationalisation and diversification 17 EPoC 2014 financial performance 28 Internationalisation: Business opportunities 36 Diversification of the EPoC 2014 39 Financing of EPoC 2014 41 Performance of non-European construction companies 49 Top 20 EPoC – Company profiles Introduction The twelfth edition of European Powers of Construction examines the performance of the major listed European construction groups in terms of revenue, market capitalisation, internationalisation, diversification, indebtedness and other financial ratios. We are pleased to present European Powers of percentage points, reaching 52.1% of total sales, while Construction 2014, our annual publication in which non-construction activity increased by 0.7 percentage we identify and outline the major listed European points to 26.2%. Additionally, we have again taken a construction groups. This publication examines the look at the main non-European construction groups, in market position and performance of the main players in order to draw comparisons with the figures and financial the industry in terms of revenue, market capitalisation, ratios recorded by our EPoC.
    [Show full text]