DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring 2022: Upperclass Courses for J.D. Students

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring 2022: Upperclass Courses for J.D. Students 6/8/2021 SPRING 2022: UPPERCLASS COURSES FOR J.D. STUDENTS MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY/SATURDAY Negotiating a M&A Transaction Decedents' Estates Civil Litigation Practice (YR) Decedents' Estates Adv Trial Practice (9:00-5:00)(bookend) 7:30-9:30 Social Media Law (X) (8:05-9:30) Social Media Law (X) (8:05-9:30) Law, Pol, & Pract of Disasters (9:00-4:30)(bookend) Mediation Advocacy Seminar (9:00-6:30) Multiparty Negotiation (9:00-5:00)(bookend) Negotiations and Mediation Sem (X)(9:004:30)(bookend) Negotiations Sem - Blank/Bertotti (9:30-5:00)(bookend) Negotiations Sem - Kleinman (9:00-6:00)(bookend) Prosecuting Sexual Violence Adv Antitrust Sem (X) Admin Law & Public Admin Sem Appellate Courts Immersion Clinic Adv Intl Comm Arbitration (X)** Adv Trial Practice (9:00-5:00)(bookend) 10:00-12:00 Appellate Courts Immersion Clinic Adv Intl Comm Arbitration (X) Campaigning for Public Office Affordable Housing Seminar Center for Applied Legal Studies (10:00-11:30) Comparative Law: Focus EU/US (X) Africana Legal Studies (X) Center for Applied Legal Studies (10:00-11:45) Bankruptcy Advocacy Feminist Legal Theory Seminar (X) Constitutional Law II Appellate Courts & Advocacy Workshop Civil Rights Clinic Business Essentials: Mini-MBA (10:00-11:25) Intl Human Rights (X)(10:00-11:25) Corporate Finance (X) Assisted Reproductive Tech Law (X) Comparative Law: Focus EU/US (X) Commercial Remedies* Law, Pol, & Pract of Disasters (9:00-4:30)(bookend) Corporate Gov, Risk Mgmt & Compliance Sem Business Essentials: Mini-MBA (10:00-11:25) Constitutional Law II Complex Litigation LGBTQ Health Law & Policy (X) Corporate Legal Department Practicum Civil Litigation Clinic Corporate Finance (X) Deals: Econ of Structuring Transactions (X) Mediation Advocacy Seminar (9:00-6:30) Criminal Law Theory in Context (X) Death Penalty Litigation Practicum Civil Rights Clinic Environmental Advocacy Sem (X) Multiparty Negotiation (9:00-5:00)(bookend) Entertainment Disputes Fin Market Reform & Innovation (X) Commercial Remedies Income and Public Benefits (10:00-11:25) Family Law I (10:00-11:25) Negotiations and Mediation Sem (X)(9:004:30)(bookend) Income and Public Benefits (10:00-11:25) Complex Litigation Intellect Prop in World Trade (X)(10:00-11:25) Fed Banking Regulation (X) Negotiations Sem - Blank/Bertotti (9:30-5:00)(bookend) Intellect Prop in World Trade (X)(10:00-11:25) Deals: Econ of Structuring Transactions (X) Internet Law (10:35-12:00) Fed Courts & the Fed System (10:00-11:25) Negotiations Sem - Kleinman (9:00-6:00)(bookend) Internet Law (10:35-12:00) Election Law Intl Arbitr in the Middle East (X) Federal White Collar Crime Policy Clinic (Harrison Inst) (10:00-1:00) Intl Economic Law & Policy Colloquium Family Law I (10:00-11:25) Intl Business Transactions (10:00-1:00) Immigration Law & Policy (X)(10:35-12:00) (X)(12:00-2:00) Federal Banking Regulation (X) Intl Human Rights (X)(10:00-11:25) Professional Responsibility Mergers and Acquisitions (X)(10:00-11:25) Federal Courts & the Fed System (10:00-11:25) Intl Investment Law & Arbitration (X) Religion, Morality & Contested Claims (X) Federal White Collar Crime Legal Writing Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Segregation Seminar Immigration Law & Policy (X)(10:35-12:00) Jeffers Social Enterprise & Nonprofit Clinic Issues in Disarm:Prolif/Terrorism (X) Legislation Colloquium: Adv Topics Tax Court Advocacy Workshop (X) Music Law Seminar Mergers and Acquisitions (X)(10:00-11:25) The Nuremberg Trials (X) Social Enterprise & Nonprofit Clinic Modern Litigation Seminar Trial Practice Special Topics in Exempt Orgs Research Skills in Intl & Comp (X) Taxation of Partnerships (X) SCI Judicial Clerkship Practicum Structuring Prv Eq Trans (X) Trial Practice Business Law Sch Leadership Sem (2:00-5:00) Administrative Law Appellate Litigation Clinic Administrative Law* Adv Top Corp Law: Control (X)(2:00-6:00) 12:30-2:30 Communications & Tech Clinic China and International Law (X) Civ Tech: Digital Tools & Access to Justice Comm Public & Global Heath Law (12:30- Adv Top Corp Law: Delaware (X)(2:00-6:00) Corporations (X) Constitutional Law II (X) (X) 1:30) Adv Trial Practice (9:00-5:00)(bookend) Current Issues in Tax Policy (X) Corporate Income Tax Law II Communications & Tech Clinic Constitutional Law II (X) Intl Business Negotiations (12:30-3:30) Federal Legislation Clinic Corporate Taxation (X) Contemporary Bias and Law Sem Corporate Taxation (X) Law, Pol, & Pract of Disasters (9:00-4:30)(bookend) Foreign Intelligence Law (X)(12:30-1:55) Domestic Violence Clinic Corporations (X) Criminal Justice Reform Sem Legal Spanish: The Traditions (X) Intl Commercial Arb w Foreign Sov (X) Employment Law (12:30-1:55) Doing Justice: Trial Judges (X) Critical Legal Theory Sem Mediation Advocacy Seminar (9:00-6:30) Intl Development & Global Health (X) Environmental Law & Justice Clinic Federal Legislation Clinic Domestic Violence Clinic Motherhood & the Law Seminar (X) Intl Economic Law & Policy Colloquium Federal Income Taxation Foreign Intelligence Law (X)(12:30-1:55) Employment Law (12:30-1:55) Multiparty Negotiation (9:00-5:00)(bookend) (X)(12:00-2:00) Health Justice Alliance Law Clinic Good and Evil Seminar (X) Environmental Law & Justice Clinic Negotiations and Mediation Sem (X)(9:004:30)(bookend) Intl Law Sem: Poverty Reduction (X) Information Privacy Law Intl Business Transactions (10:00-1:00) Federal Income Taxation Negotiations Sem - Blank/Bertotti (9:30-5:00)(bookend) Legal Writing Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Intl Arbitration Colloquium Intl Negotiations Sem (X) Health Justice Alliance Law Clinic Negotiations Sem - Kleinman (9:00-6:00)(bookend) Keene Intl Contracts & Sales Law (X) Legal Writ Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) – Information Privacy Law** Negotiations Sem - Linkins (1:15-5:44)(bookend) Legal Writing Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Intl Law in Domestic Courts Sem (X) Creighton Intl Arbitration Colloquium Policy Clinic (Harrison Inst) (10:00-1:00) Tiscione Juvenile Justice Clinic (YR) Legal Writ Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Han Intl Contracts & Sales Law (X) Tax Treaties (X)(1:20-4:20) Securities Regulation (X) Law & Entrepreneurship Practicum Legal Writ Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Perlin Justice & Account for Intl Atrocity (X) Sports Law (X)(12:30-1:55) Patent Trial Practice (X)(2:00-5:00) Securities Regulation (X) Legal Writing Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Tech Law & Policy Colloquium Reading the Police Seminar Sports Law (X)(12:30-1:55) Delaurentis Reproductive Rights (X) Survey of State & Local Tax New Deal Legal History Seminar Tax of Fin. Instmts. & Trans. (2:30-5:30) Takeovers, Mergers & Acqs (X) Securities Lit & Enforcement NOTE: Courses in bold are Graduate Courses; (X) = Cross Listed JD/LLM Courses; * = “A” Week Courses; ** = “B” Week Courses 6/8/2021 MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY/SATURDAY Adv Patent Law Adv Securities Regulation Sem Church-State Law Seminar Addiction & Mental Health Law (X) Adv Top Corp Law: Control (X)(2:00-6:00) 3:00-5:00 Business Law Sch Leadership Sem (2:00-5:00) Antitrust Law Sem: Case Devel (X) Corp Purpose, Env & Soc Gov Sem (X) Animal Law Seminar Adv Top Corp Law: Delaware (X)(2:00-6:00) Civil Rts Statutes & Sup Ct Sem Artificial Intell & Natl Sec (X) Criminal Justice II (3:00-4:25) Business Essentials: Mini-MBA (3:00-4:25) Adv Trial Practice (9:00-5:00)(bookend) Conservative Jurisprudence Sem (X) Business Essentials: Mini-MBA (3:00-4:25) Const Litigation & Exec Branch Environmental Research Workshop (X) Criminal Def & Pris Adv Clinic Antitrust in Action (4:00-7:30) Counseling the Corp in Crisis Constitutional Impact Lit Practicum Global Law Scholars Seminar II Intl Business Negotiations (12:30-3:30) Criminal Justice II (3:00-4:25) Criminal Def & Pris Adv Clinic (YR) Criminal Justice Clinic Global Tech Law Seminar (X) Curr Dev in Intl Tax Sem (X) Intl Women's Human Rights Clinic Criminal Procedure Criminal Justice Clinic (YR) Human Rts & Its Discontents (X) Evidence Law, Pol, & Pract of Disasters (9:00-4:30)(bookend) Financial Reg & Fin Crisis (X) Drftng Prtnrshp & Llc Agrmnts (X) Info Ops in Cyber Age: Law & Policy (X) Fed Courts & the Fed System (3:00-4:25) Mediation Advocacy Seminar (9:00-6:30) Human Rts & Inter-American Sys (X) Evidence Gender and Sexuality (X)(3:00-4:25) Intl Business Negotiations Fed Courts & the Fed System (3:00-4:25) Intl Environ Law in Practice (X) Mergers/Acquisitions in Practice - Saunders/Zoubek Intl Project Finance & Invest (X) Intell Prop & Info Pol Clinic (4:00-7:00) Intl Trade (X)(3:00-4:25) Gender and Sexuality (X)(3:00-4:25) Intl Human Rights (X) Labor Law & Changing US Workforce Intell Prop & Info Pol Clinic Intl Trade (X)(3:00-4:25) Legal Writing Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Sirota Mergers/Acquisitions in Practice - Stebbins/Arcano Lawyers' Ethics Intl Women's Human Rights Clinic Legal Writing Sem: Theory & Pract (YR) - Natl Sec Law & Pvte Sector (X) (4:00-7:30) Military, Veterans & Society Patent Trial Practice (X)(2:00-5:00) Carroll Natural Resources Law & Pol Practicum (X) Multiparty Negotiation (9:00-5:00)(bookend) National Security Lawyering Sem (X) Race and American Law Non-Profit Organizations (3:00-4:25) Race and American Law Negotiations and Mediation Sem (X)(9:004:30)(bookend) Nationalism, States, & Cult Ident (X) Resolution of Intl Fin Crises (X) Policy Clinic (Harrison Inst) Securities Regulation (X)(3:00-4:25) Negotiations Sem - Blank/Bertotti (9:30-5:00)(bookend) Non-Profit Organizations (3:00-4:25) Securities Regulation (X)(3:00-4:25) Sovereign Debt & Fin Stability (X) Negotiations Sem - Kleinman (9:00-6:00)(bookend) O’Neill Institute Practicum Social Enterprise, Impact Inv Street Law: Mock Trial Adv Negotiations Sem - Linkins (1:15-5:44)(bookend) Supreme Court Litigation Sem Poverty Law and Policy (YR) Tax of Fin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lyrics and the Law : the Constitution of Law in Music
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-2006 Lyrics and the law : the constitution of law in music. Aaron R. S., Lorenz University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Lorenz, Aaron R. S.,, "Lyrics and the law : the constitution of law in music." (2006). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 2399. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/2399 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LYRICS AND THE LAW: THE CONSTITUTION OF LAW IN MUSIC A Dissertation Presented by AARON R.S. LORENZ Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY February 2006 Department of Political Science © Copyright by Aaron R.S. Lorenz 2006 All Rights Reserved LYRICS AND THE LAW: THE CONSTITUTION OF LAW IN MUSIC A Dissertation Presented by AARON R.S. LORENZ Approved as to style and content by: Sheldon Goldman, Member DEDICATION To Martin and Malcolm, Bob and Peter. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project has been a culmination of many years of guidance and assistance by friends, family, and colleagues. I owe great thanks to many academics in both the Political Science and Legal Studies fields. Graduate students in Political Science have helped me develop a deeper understanding of public law and made valuable comments on various parts of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Music Law and Business: a Comprehensive Bibliography, 1982-1991 Gail I
    Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal Volume 13 | Number 4 Article 5 1-1-1991 Music Law and Business: A Comprehensive Bibliography, 1982-1991 Gail I. Winson Janine S. Natter Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/ hastings_comm_ent_law_journal Part of the Communications Law Commons, Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Gail I. Winson and Janine S. Natter, Music Law and Business: A Comprehensive Bibliography, 1982-1991, 13 Hastings Comm. & Ent. L.J. 811 (1991). Available at: https://repository.uchastings.edu/hastings_comm_ent_law_journal/vol13/iss4/5 This Special Feature is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal by an authorized editor of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Music Law and Business: A Comprehensive Bibliography, 1982-1991* By GAIL I. WINSON** AND JANINE S. NArrER*** Table of Contents I. Law Review and Journal Articles ......................... 818 A . A ntitrust ............................................ 818 B. Bankruptcy .......................................... 819 C. Bibliographies ....................................... 819 D . Contracts ........................................... 819 1. M anagem ent ..................................... 821 2. Personal Service ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Entertainment and Sports Law University of Memphis Law School Career Services Office
    Entertainment and Sports Law University of Memphis Law School Career Services Office What is entertainment and sports law? Entertainment and sports law is civil law of a specific character that relates to the fields of entertainment and athletics. The practice involves contracts, labor law, corporate finance, intellectual property, and antitrust. Lawyers practicing in the field of entertainment and sports law specialize in knowing and understanding their clients’ industry and are able to advocate for their clients’ interests. In the major professional sports leagues of the National Football League (“NFL”), Major League Baseball (“MLB”), Na- tional Basketball Association (“NBA”), and National Hockey League (“NHL”), players’ associations act much like unions, regulating fees and salaries for sports professionals, coaches, and agents. For the lawyer specializing in entertainment law, intellectual property law takes center stage. Copyright law concerns the rights of creators of artistic works in the music, entertainment, publishing, and fine arts industries. Where do entertainment and Where do sports and entertainment lawyers do? sports lawyers work? Negotiating: Sports and entertainment lawyers negotiate contracts with spon- Private law firms: Some large firms sorships, television syndicators, and other representatives that interact with have departments specializing in the sports and entertainment industry. A lawyer working for a band might help to negotiate contracts with particular venues at a particular rate. entertainment and sports law, es- pecially in large cities where record Transactional work: Entertainment lawyers frequently contract for one-time labels house their headquarters or events that may never reoccur. Thus, entertainment and sports lawyers must in cities with professional sports be able to draft contracts that advance and protect their clients’ interests under a variety of circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • Music Law 102
    Music Law 102 2019 Edition LawPracticeCLE Unlimited All Courses. All Formats. All Year. ABOUT US LawPracticeCLE is a national continuing legal education company designed to provide education on current, trending issues in the legal world to judges, attorneys, paralegals, and other interested business professionals. New to the playing eld, LawPracticeCLE is a major contender with its oerings of Live Webinars, On-Demand Videos, and In-per- son Seminars. LawPracticeCLE believes in quality education, exceptional customer service, long-lasting relationships, and networking beyond the classroom. We cater to the needs of three divisions within the legal realm: pre-law and law students, paralegals and other support sta, and attorneys. WHY WORK WITH US? At LawPracticeCLE, we partner with experienced attorneys and legal professionals from all over the country to bring hot topics and current content that are relevant in legal practice. We are always looking to welcome dynamic and accomplished lawyers to share their knowledge! As a LawPracticeCLE speaker, you receive a variety of benets. In addition to CLE teaching credit attorneys earn for presenting, our presenters also receive complimentary tuition on LawPracticeCLE’s entire library of webinars and self-study courses. LawPracticeCLE also aords expert professors unparalleled exposure on a national stage in addition to being featured in our Speakers catalog with your name, headshot, biography, and link back to your personal website. Many of our courses accrue thousands of views, giving our speakers the chance to network with attorneys across the country. We also oer a host of ways for our team of speakers to promote their programs, including highlight clips, emails, and much more! If you are interested in teaching for LawPracticeCLE, we want to hear from you! Please email our Directior of Operations at [email protected] with your information.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutral Is the New Blind
    Neutral is the New Blind: Calling for Gender Segregated Evidence in UK Legislative Inquiries regarding the Music Industries Dr Metka Potočnik* Abstract In late 2020, the Government responded to the enormous crisis in the UK music industries, caused by the Covid-19 pandemic, by initiating several legislative inquiries, aimed at reviewing the rules regulating the industry, including rules on commercialisation of intellectual property (IP). The aim of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport (DCMS) inquiries is purportedly to improve the fairness and viability of the sector, which was devastated by the pandemic. At the same time, the Covid-19 crisis served as a catalyst to expose the pre-existing inequalities and unfairness in the UK music industries. This article explores the path of the UK DCMS 2020-21 legislative inquiry into the Economics of Music Streaming as a case study to the current approach in UK regulation of the music industries. Informed by the feminist theory of relational legal feminism and embedded in the broader framework of IP Social Justice theory, the author argues that the current approach to legislative inquiries is incomplete, because it fails to take into account the systemic barriers faced by women (i.e., all who identify as women), including gender minority musicians in the sector. The evidence collected fails to investigate the lived experience of women, to the detriment of fairness of the overall proposal of future reform. Keywords Feminist scholarship, IP Social Justice, Intellectual Property Law, the music industries, streaming, communication to the public, Brexit, EU-derived domestic legislation, retained EU case law, evidence-led policy, legislative inquiry.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Sampling and the Legal Implications of Its Use After Bridgeport
    Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development Volume 22 Issue 1 Volume 22, Summer 2007, Issue 1 Article 9 Digital Sampling and the Legal Implications of Its Use After Bridgeport Amanda Webber Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.stjohns.edu/jcred This Note is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development by an authorized editor of St. John's Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DIGITAL SAMPLING AND THE LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF ITS USE AFTER BRIDGEPORT AMANDA WEBBER* INTRODUCTION The increase in digital sampling has been greatly attributed to the hip hop industry,1 one of the most influential and popular genres of music in the world today.2 "Old recordings are to the hip-hop producer what paint is to the painter-raw material to be manipulated into art."3 Today's "studio musicians" are able to manipulate and add effects to previously recorded music, creating an infinite amount of new and innovative sounds without fear of ruining the sound quality.4 However, to the world outside of the hip hop industry, music that utilizes digital * J.D. Candidate, June 2007, St. John's University School of Law; B.A. Public Relations, Minor in Business, Pennsylvania State University at University Park, December 2003. 1 See Susan Butler, Court Ruling Could Chill Sample Use, BILLBOARD, September 18, 2004. According to the Roots' co-manager Shawn Gee, "[s]ampling is so important.
    [Show full text]
  • From Owning to Using Music: Transactional Music Attorneys Struggle with a Changing Landscape and Its Financial Realities
    From Owning to Using Music: Transactional Music Attorneys Struggle With A Changing Landscape and Its Financial Realities By John Simson1 and Ken Abdo2 It is nearly impossible to describe the momentous seismic shift that we have all witnessed over the past fifteen years with each new technological development and method of delivering music to consumers; it is probably enough to say that it’s been a hell of a ride! Transactional music attorneys have seen the transformation of five major labels into three major entertainment companies: no longer able to achieve the return on investment from CD sales that fueled their enormous growth in the 1980’s and 1990’s, they have tried to re‐invent themselves as leaner, more agile, marketers and branders of recording artists. Record company executives have long claimed that it was record company money that built brands through the recordings they funded and released together with the promotion and marketing they advanced and administered. Tour support was frequently the only way that new bands could afford to tour and grow a fan base. Is it more surprising that for decades record labels didn’t try to share in touring and that their attempts to share in other revenue streams, most notably merchandize and publishing, were on a “right to match” another company’s offer and not compelled under the terms of the record deal? Now it is expected that 1 John L. Simson was signed to Perception Records in 1971 as a singer/songwriter. He was recently named a Special Consultant for Artist Relations and Business Development by Kobalt Music to assist them in building a "neighboring rights" business (collecting artists' royalties around the world).
    [Show full text]
  • How Spotify Killed the Radio Star: an Analysis on How the Songwriter
    Cybaris® Volume 6 | Issue 1 Article 7 2015 How Spotify Killed the Radio Star: An Analysis on How the Songwriter Equity Act Could Aid the Current Online Music Distribution Market in Failing Artists Caitlin Kowalke Follow this and additional works at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cybaris Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Kowalke, Caitlin (2015) "How Spotify Killed the Radio Star: An Analysis on How the Songwriter Equity Act Could Aid the Current Online Music Distribution Market in Failing Artists," Cybaris®: Vol. 6: Iss. 1, Article 7. Available at: http://open.mitchellhamline.edu/cybaris/vol6/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Reviews and Journals at Mitchell Hamline Open Access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cybaris® by an authorized administrator of Mitchell Hamline Open Access. For more information, please contact [email protected]. © Mitchell Hamline School of Law Kowalke: How Spotify Killed the Radio Star: An Analysis on How the Songwri Published by Mitchell Hamline Open Access, 2015 1 Cybaris®, Vol. 6, Iss. 1 [2015], Art. 7 HOW SPOTIFY KILLED THE RADIO STAR: AN ANALYSIS ON HOW THE SONGWRITER EQUITY ACT COULD AID THE CURRENT ONLINE MUSIC DISTRIBUTION MARKET IN FAILING ARTISTS CAITLIN KOWALKE† TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ............................................................................. 195 II. What Ownership Rights Are Songwriters Guaranteed Under Current Copyright Law? ........................................... 198 A. Mechanical Licenses ..................................................... 198 B. Compulsory Licenses ..................................................... 200 C. Section 114 Limitations ................................................. 204 III. Industry Limitations on Musical Copyright Today ............... 205 A. Emerging Technology as a Constant Threat to Copyright Protections ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Copyright Law May Affect Pop Music Without Our Knowing It
    Texas A&M University School of Law Texas A&M Law Scholarship Faculty Scholarship 12-2014 How Copyright Law May Affect Pop Music without Our Knowing It Peter K. Yu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, and the Intellectual Property Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter K. Yu, How Copyright Law May Affect Pop Music without Our Knowing It, 83 UMKC L. Rev. 363 (2014). Available at: https://scholarship.law.tamu.edu/facscholar/405 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Texas A&M Law Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Texas A&M Law Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. HOW COPYRIGHT LAW MAY AFFECT POP MUSIC WITHOUT OUR KNOWING IT Peter K. Yu* I. INTRODUCTION When copyright law is linked to the creation of music-the focus of this Symposium-interesting questions arise. In the context of classical music, for example, why could Johann Sebastian Bach "recycle" in his Concerto for Four Harpsichords the opening phrase in Antonio Vivaldi's Concerto for Four Violins, Strings and Harpsichord Continuo?' Why could Peter Ilyich Tchaikovsky include in his 1812 Overture repetitive fragments of La Marseillaise and the anthem God Save the Tsar! to portray the clash between the French and Russian armies?2 Would copyright protection in musical works help Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart avoid poverty and the fate of dying penniless? Or would such protection instead lead him to behave more like Johannes Brahms and Giuseppe Verdi, whose creativity slowed down significantly following the introduction of copyright protection?3 * Copyright © 2014 Peter K.
    [Show full text]
  • Rosen-Music and Copyright.Pdf
    Music and Copyright This page intentionally left blank Music and Copyright Ronald S. Rosen 1 1 Oxford University Press, Inc., publishes works that further Oxford University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education. Oxford New York Auckland Cape Town Dar es Salaam Hong Kong Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Nairobi New Delhi Shanghai Taipei Toronto With offi ces in Argentina Austria Brazil Chile Czech Republic France Greece Guatemala Hungary Italy Japan Poland Portugal Singapore South Korea Switzerland Th ailand Turkey Ukraine Vietnam Copyright © 2008 by Ronald S. Rosen Published by Oxford University Press, Inc. 198 Madison Avenue, New York, New York 10016 Oxford is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press Oxford University Press is a registered trademark of Oxford University Press, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior permission of Ronald S. Rosen. _____________________________________________ Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rosen, Ronald S. Music and copyright / Ronald S. Rosen. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-19-533836-2 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Copyright—Music—United States. 2. Fair use (Copyright)—United States. 3. Copyright infringement—United States. I. Title. KF3035.R67 2008 346.7304’82—dc22 2008013929 _____________________________________________ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper Note to Readers Th is publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered.
    [Show full text]
  • The Music Online Competition Act of 2001
    DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 12 Issue 1 Spring 2002: The Recording Academy Entertainment Law Initiative Legal Writing Article 5 Competition 2001-02 The Music Online Competition Act of 2001 Merritt A. Gardiner Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip Recommended Citation Merritt A. Gardiner, The Music Online Competition Act of 2001, 12 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 25 (2002) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol12/iss1/5 This Lead Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gardiner: The Music Online Competition Act of 2001 THE MUSIC ONLINE COMPETITION ACT OF 2001 I. INTRODUCTION The Music Online Competition Act of 2001 ("MOCA")l was recently introduced to Congress by representatives Rick Boucher (D-VA) and Chris Cannon (R-UT) in order to smooth out the jagged edges created in our current, yet outdated, existing copyright law. The bipartisan legislation was encouraged to promote the rapidly expanding online broadcasting and distribution of music and to prevent antitrust behavior as a result of the recent joint ventures between recording companies and online music distributors: MusicNet, supported by RealNetworks, Warner Music Group, Bertelsmann AG and EMI and Pressplay, supported by Sony and Vivendi Universal.2 MOCA was drafted to update and clarify provisions of the Copyright Act, which have spurred costly legal and regulatory disputes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Case for Rethinking Music Copyright Protection, 10 Mich
    Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review Volume 10 | Issue 2 2004 Musical Musings: The aC se for Rethinking Music Copyright Protection J. Michael Keyes Gonzaga University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mttlr Part of the Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Legal History Commons Recommended Citation J. M. Keyes, Musical Musings: The Case for Rethinking Music Copyright Protection, 10 Mich. Telecomm. & Tech. L. Rev. 407 (2004). Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mttlr/vol10/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MUSICAL MUSINGS: THE CASE FOR RETHINKING MUSIC COPYRIGHT PROTECTION J. Michael Keyes* Cite as: J. Michael Keyes, Musical Musings: The Case for Rethinking Music Copyright Protection, 10 MICH. TELECOMM. TECH. L. REV. 407 (2004), availableat http://www.mttlr.org/volten/Keyes.pdf IN TRODUCTION ...................................................................................... 408 I. A HISTORICAL SKETCH OF MUSIC COPYRIGHT ........................ 410 A. The Nascent Years of Music Copyright, 1800-1850 .......... 410 B. The Music Industry Gains Steam, 1850-1900 ..................
    [Show full text]