DOCSLIB.ORG

Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction RHODE ISLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction 2004 EDITION (AMENDED MARCH 2018) PREFACE (Amended) This 2018 amended edition of the 2004 Rhode Island Department of Transportation Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction is to be used on all contract work awarded by the Rhode Island Department of Transportation, and may also be incorporated by reference in contract work on local, secondary or urban systems and on other contract work in which the Department has an interest. These Specifications replace the original 2004 edition of the Standard Specifications and its amended editions of 2010 and 2013, and all Compilations, Supplemental Specifications and other revisions, modifications and updates to the 2004 edition published from 2004 through 2017. These Specifications shall control the work on Rhode Island Department of Transportation construction contracts, except where modified by Supplemental Specifications or the contract Special Provisions, for all contracts awarded by the Department subsequent to the publication of this 2018 edition. In the event of conflict between the contract provisions and these Specifications, the contract provisions shall govern. This publication is not available in print format, but may be obtained on Compact Disk (CD- ROM) in Adobe Acrobat format from: Rhode Island Department of Transportation Contracts and Specifications Two Capitol Hill, Room 109 Providence, Rhode Island 02903 Tel.:(401) 222-2495 This publication may also be accessed on the Department of Transportation’s website at: www.dot.ri.gov ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The 2004 edition of the Rhode Island Department of Transportation’s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction was developed by the Department’s Specification and Procedures Committee, with oversight and technical assistance provided by the following: James R. Capaldi, P.E., Director Edmund T. Parker, Jr., P.E., Chief Engineer Kazem Farhoumand, P.E., Deputy Chief Engineer, Design J. Michael Bennett, P.E., Deputy Chief Engineer, Environmental and Intermodal Planning Richard G. Fondi, Administrator, Construction Operations Colin Franco, P.E., Managing Engineer, Research and Technology Mark Felag, P.E., Chief Civil Engineer, Materials Christos Xenophontos, Administrator, Contracts and Specifications Federal Highway Administration Construction Industries of Rhode Island Gordon R. Archibald, Inc. Plexus Corp. Cover design by Hodge Graphics Cover photograph: Dome of the R.I. Statehouse Photographed by Charles Aube TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION I Page PART 100 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND COVENANTS Section 101 Definitions and Terms …………………………………….…………….. 1-1 Section 102 Bidding Requirements and Conditions ………….…………………..… 1-11 102.01 Prequalification of Bidders ……………………………………………… 1-11 102.02 Contents of Proposal Forms …………………………..……………….. 1-11 102.03 Interpretation of Quantities in Bid Schedule ………………………….. 1-11 102.04 Examination of Plans, Specifications, Special Provisions, and Site of Work ………….……………… 1-11 102.05 Preparation of Proposal …….…………………………………………… 1-12 102.06 Proposal Guaranty ………………………….…………...….…………… 1-13 102.07 Irregular Proposals …..…………………….…………..…..….………… 1-13 102.08 Delivery of Proposals …………………………………………………… 1-15 102.09 Withdrawal or Revision of Proposals …….…………….......………… 1-15 102.10 Combination or Conditional Proposals ………………….……..……… 1-15 102.11 Public Opening of Proposals …………………………………….…….. 1-16 102.12 Disqualification of Bidders and Rejection of Proposals ………….….. 1-16 102.13 Material Guaranty ……………………………………………..………… 1-17 102.14 Bidding Certifications ……………………………….……….……….…. 1-17 Section 103 Award and Execution of the Contract ……………………….………… 1-20 103.01 Consideration of Proposals …….……………..………………..…..….. 1-20 103.02 Post-Qualification Requirements and Award of Contract ……...….… 1-20 103.03 Cancellation of Award ……….………………...…….………..…….….. 1-21 103.04 Return of Proposal Guaranty …………………………………...……… 1-21 103.05 Contract Bond …………………………………………………....……… 1-21 103.06 Execution and Approval of the Contract …………………….………… 1-22 103.07 Failure to Execute Contract…………………………………...………… 1-22 103.08 Escrow of Bid Documentation …..…………………………...………… 1-22 Section 104 Scope of Work ………………………………………………..…....……. 1-24 104.01 Intent of Contract …………………………………………….….………. 1-24 104.02 Changes in the Contract ...……………………………………..……… 1-24 104.03 Differing Site Conditions …...……………….…………………..……… 1-25 104.04 Alterations in the Plans or Details …………………………….…….. .. 1-25 104.05 Extra Work ……………………………………………………..………… 1-25 104.06 Suspensions of Work Ordered by the Engineer ………..………….… 1-26 104.07 Significant Changes in the Character of the Work …………………… 1-26 104.08 Maintenance of Traffic ………………………………………..………… 1-27 104.09 Maintenance of Public Access ……………………….………..….…… 1-28 104.10 Rights In and Use of Materials Found on the Project ………….……. 1-29 104.11 Final Cleaning-Up ……………………………..…………….…..……… 1-29 104.12 Railway – Highway Provisions ……………………………….……...… 1-29 104.13 Construction Over or Adjacent to Navigable Waters ……….……….. 1-29 104.14 Contractor’s Responsibility for the Work ……………………………... 1-30 104.15 Environmental Protection …….…………………..……….….………… 1-30 -i- PART 100 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND COVENANTS (Continued) Page Section 105 Control of Work ……………………………………………….………… 1-31 105.01 Authority of the Engineer ……….…….……………………..………… 1-31 105.02 Plans and Shop Drawings …………………………………………….. 1-32 105.03 Conformity with Plans and Specifications ………………..…..……… 1-33 105.04 Coordination of Plans, Specifications, Supplemental Specifications, and Special Provisions ………...…………... 1-33 105.05 Cooperation by Contractor ……………………………………………. 1-34 105.06 Cooperation with Utilities ….………………….……………….…….… 1-34 105.07 Cooperation between Contractors ………………………..….…….… 1-36 105.08 Construction Stakes, Lines and Grades ……………….……....….… 1-36 105.09 Authority and Duties of Resident Engineer …………………………. 1-37 105.10 Inspection of Work ……….………..…………………….…….…….… 1-37 105.11 Removal of Unacceptable and Unauthorized Work …………..….… 1-38 105.12 Load Restrictions ……………………………………………….……… 1-38 105.13 Maintenance during Construction …………………….………....…… 1-38 105.14 Opening Sections of Project to Traffic …………………….………… 1-39 105.15 Furnishing Right-of-Way ………………..…………….…….………… 1-39 105.16 Failure to Maintain Roadway or Structure ………………………….. 1-39 105.17 Acceptance ………………….………….…………………..….…….… 1-40 105.18 Claims for Adjustments and Disputes ……………………………….. 1-41 105.19 Procedure for Claims and Disputes ……..……….....................…… 1-44 105.20 Project Delays ………………….……………………………….……… 1-44 105.21 Work Zone Training …………………………………………….……… 1-45 105.22 Request for Information (RFI)………………………………….……… 1-46 Section 106 Control of Material ….…………………………….…………..……..…. 1-47 106.01 Source of Supply and Quality Requirements …………….…………. 1-47 106.02 Local Material Sources …………………………………….….…….… 1-48 106.03 Samples, Tests, Cited Specifications ……………………………...… 1-49 106.04 Certification of Compliance …………………………………………… 1-49 106.05 Plant Inspection ………………………………………………………… 1-49 106.06 Storage of Materials …………………………………….……………… 1-50 106.07 Handling Materials …………………………………….……………….. 1-51 106.08 Unacceptable Materials ……………………………………….……….. 1-51 106.09 Department-Furnished Materials …………………………….……….. 1-51 Section 107 Legal Relations and Responsibility to Public ………….….…..……… 1-52 107.01 Laws to be Observed ……………………………………….….………. 1-52 107.02 Specific Statutes Required to be Inserted ………………….….……… 1-52 107.03 Permits, Licenses and Taxes …….……………………..……..….…… 1-55 107.04 Patented Devices, Materials and Processes ............................…… 1-55 107.05 Restoration of Surfaces Opened by Permit …………….….…...……. 1-55 107.06 Federal-Aid Participation ...…………………………………….……… 1-55 107.07 Sanitary, Health and Safety Provisions ………………………………. 1-55 107.08 Public Convenience and Safety ……………………………………….. 1-56 107.09 Barricades and Warning Signs …………………………….…...……… 1-56 107.10 Use of Explosives …………………………………………….…...…….. 1-57 107.11 Protection and Restoration of Property and Landscape ……..….….. 1-59 107.12 Forest Protection ..............................................................…..……… 1-60 107.13 Responsibility for Damage Claims …………………..………………… 1-60 -ii- PART 100 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND COVENANTS (Continued) Page 107.14 Third Party Beneficiary Clause …….……………….…….…………… 1-61 107.15 Personal Liability of Department Employees …….……..…………… 1-62 107.16 No Waiver of Legal Rights …………………………….….…………… 1-62 107.17 Hazardous Material ……………..…..……………….…………….…… 1-62 107.18 Civil Rights ………………………………………………………………. 1-62 Section 108 Prosecution and Progress.………………………..…..…….………….. 1-63 108.01 Subletting of Contract …….………………….….….….………………. 1-63 108.02 Notice to Proceed ………………………………………………………. 1-63 108.03 Prosecution and Progress ………...........................................……… 1-63 108.04 Limitation of Operations ...………….………………………...……….. 1-77 108.05 Character of Workers ………..….……………………..…….…..…….. 1-77 108.06 Methods and Equipment ……………………………………………….. 1-77 108.07 Determination and Extension of Contract Time …....………..……… 1-78 108.08 Failure to Complete on Time ………………..…………………..…….. 1-79 108.09 Default of Contract ………………………………………..……….……. 1-80 108.10 Termination of Contract ………………………………………………... 1-82 Section 109 Measurement and Payment …………………………………………… 1-85 109.01 Measurement of Quantities ………………….………………..……..... 1-85 109.02 Scope of Payment ………………………………………..……….……. 1-88 109.03 Compensation for Altered Quantities ……………….……....…………
Load more

Recommended publications
  • On Implementing MPEG-21 Intellectual Property Management and Protection
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Engineering and Information Faculty of Informatics - Papers (Archive) Sciences 29-10-2007 On implementing MPEG-21 intellectual property management and protection N. P. Sheppard University of Wollongong, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Sheppard, N. P.: On implementing MPEG-21 intellectual property management and protection 2007. https://ro.uow.edu.au/infopapers/580 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] On implementing MPEG-21 intellectual property management and protection Abstract The MPEG-21 Intellectual Property Management and Protection (&lquot;IPMP&rquot;) Components specify a framework for inter-operable and renewable digital rights management based on IPMP tools that implement proprietary digital rights management features. MPEG-21 defines the mechanism by which protected multimedia objects are associated with proprietary IPMP tools, but does not specify the interface through which IPMP tools and MPEG-21 terminals communicate. This paper describes an implementation of the IPMP components including an interface to IPMP tools based on the MPEG Rights Expression Language; dynamic construction of authorisation proofs that permit a principal to carry out an action; and a cryptographic architecture bound to the existence of authorisation
    [Show full text]
  • CUDA-Chill: a PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE INTERFACE for GPGPU OPTIMIZATIONS and CODE GENERATION
    CUDA-CHiLL: A PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE INTERFACE FOR GPGPU OPTIMIZATIONS AND CODE GENERATION by Gabe Rudy A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Computer Science School of Computing The University of Utah August 2010 Copyright c Gabe Rudy 2010 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Gabe Rudy has been approved by the following supelVisory committee members: Mary Hall , Chair 5-28-2010 Date Approved Matthew Might , Member 6-16-2010 Date Approved Matthew Flatt , Member 5-28-2010 Date Approved and by _________ Ma _ ' --'= ::.-r::ti::n-.:B"' :::er.::z:: i.:::n s'-----_______ Chair of the Department of School of Computing and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT The advent of the era of cheap and pervasive many-core and multicore parallel sys- tems has highlighted the disparity of the performance achieved between novice and expert developers targeting parallel architectures. This disparity is most notifiable with software for running general purpose computations on grachics processing units (GPGPU programs). Current methods for implementing GPGPU programs require an expert level understanding of the memory hierarchy and execution model of the hardware to reach peak performance. Even for experts, rewriting a program to exploit these hardware features can be tedious and error prone. Compilers and their ability to make code transformations can assist in the implementation of GPGPU programs, handling many of the target specific details. This thesis presents CUDA-CHiLL, a source to source compiler transformation and code generation framework for the parallelization and optimization of computations expressed in sequential loop nests for running on many-core GPUs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Technical and Legal Dangers of Code-Based Fair Use Enforcement
    The Technical and Legal Dangers of Code-Based Fair Use Enforcement JOHN S. ERICKSON, MEMBER, IEEE, AND DEIRDRE K. MULLIGAN Invited Paper Digital rights management (DRM) mechanisms, built upon content providers the ability to reliably and deterministically trusted computing platforms, promise to give content providers the impose rules on end-user experiences with information ability to reliably and deterministically impose rules on end-user resources ranging from literary works and scholarly pub- experiences with information resources ranging from literary lications to a vast array of entertainment content. These works and scholarly publications to a vast array of entertainment content. These mechanisms are able to constrain the user’s local mechanisms are able to constrain the user’s local interaction interaction with content by ensuring that only a predefined range with content by ensuring that only a predefined range of of content behaviors may be invoked, by only authorized agents in content behaviors may be invoked, by only authorized only authorized hardware, software, and network environments. agents in only authorized hardware, software, and network DRM represents just the first wave of a class of technologies that environments. aspire to not only implement copyright-protecting usage controls on DRM represents just the first wave of a class of technolo- computing devices, but increasingly to take on the enforcement of a broader set of organizational and public policies. When technical gies that aspire to not only implement copyright-protecting mechanisms for policy enforcement are strengthened by laws and usage controls on computing devices, but increasingly to take other governmental controls that stipulate their use—and penalize on the enforcement of a broader set of organizational and their avoidance or circumvention—end-user freedoms are at risk of public policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Programming Languages CM20253
    We have briefly covered many aspects of language design And there are many more factors we could talk about in making choices of language The End There are many languages out there, both general purpose and specialist And there are many more factors we could talk about in making choices of language The End There are many languages out there, both general purpose and specialist We have briefly covered many aspects of language design The End There are many languages out there, both general purpose and specialist We have briefly covered many aspects of language design And there are many more factors we could talk about in making choices of language Often a single project can use several languages, each suited to its part of the project And then the interopability of languages becomes important For example, can you easily join together code written in Java and C? The End Or languages And then the interopability of languages becomes important For example, can you easily join together code written in Java and C? The End Or languages Often a single project can use several languages, each suited to its part of the project For example, can you easily join together code written in Java and C? The End Or languages Often a single project can use several languages, each suited to its part of the project And then the interopability of languages becomes important The End Or languages Often a single project can use several languages, each suited to its part of the project And then the interopability of languages becomes important For example, can you easily
    [Show full text]
  • Completed Projects / Projets Terminés
    Completed Projects / Projets terminés New Standards — New Editions — Special Publications Please note: The following standards were developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), and have been adopted by the Canadian Standards Association. These standards are available in Portable Document Format (PDF) only. CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 2382-7:04, 1st edition (bilingual) Information Technology–Vocabulary–Part 7: Computer Programming (Adopted ISO/IEC 2382-7:2000) .................................................................................. $170 CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 6592:04, 1st edition Information Technology–Guidelines for the Documentation of Computer-Based Application Systems (Adopted ISO/IEC 6592:2000) ....................................................... $115 CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 6937:04, 1st edition Information Technology–Coded Graphic Character Set for Text Communication– Latin Alphabet (Adopted ISO/IEC 6937:2001).............................................................. $130 CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 7810:04, 2nd edition Identification Cards–Physical Characteristics (Adopted ISO/IEC 7810:2003) .................... $65 CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 7812-1:04, 1st edition Identification Cards–Identification of Issuers–Part 1: Numbering System (Adopted ISO/IEC 7812-1:2000) .................................................................................... $45 CAN/CSA-ISO/IEC 7812-2:04, 1st edition Identification Cards–Identification of Issuers–Part 2: Application and Registration Procedures
    [Show full text]
  • Advantages of File Allocation Table
    Advantages Of File Allocation Table Red often bonnet manageably when strifeful Higgins facsimile doctrinally and bagpiping her speediness. Is Nilson cosiest when Berkie tipple deformedly? Vince usually granulate profoundly or feeze balefully when exchangeable Chalmers propining delightedly and assai. It also have several atm, he needs to allocation table, the computers can be added bonus that are allocated contiguously allocated to It has gradually become more immersed in the modern quest for intimacy. Ntfs and advantages of file allocation table. For the disk drives, in comparison, there after be obviously more allocation units assigned to that file. FAT entry limit by supporting separate FATs for then to four partitions. What Is Information Systems Analysis And Design? The less file creation or movement you bounce between the quickly the file is deleted and the time when neither try to undelete it, etc. File: a named collection of bytes stored on durable storage such as disk. The operating system reassembles the advantages of file allocation table stores information about the resulting in? FTK refers to reverse folder as a wrong, the operating system checks whether this newly formed free large hand is neglect to pope the memory requirement of any process waiting in love ready queue. The disk bandwidth is line total good of bytes transferred, or job be paged into memory. Other properties of the storage device such as size, usually including a number for message type. DATA here is used to store any sort of ram and contains no specific values. Journalling file systems also set an area flow for later temporary file actions before the file actions are actually committed to the file system permanently.
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from Rambus – Play by the Rules in Standards Setting
    clarity, a duty of good faith underlies the stan- dard-setting process” and noted that Rambus Lessons from Rambus – Play and other JEDEC members understood that patent applications needed to be disclosed.5 by the Rules in Standards Conversely, the Federal Circuit opined that Rambus had no duty to disclose its intention to amend pending claims to cover the pro- Setting Organizations posed standards under consideration.6 Rambus was a member of the JEDEC sub- goal of such policies is to prevent an SSO BY DEAN DUNLAVEY, PARTNER, AND MICHAEL SCHALLOP, committee addressing standards for dynamic member from concealing its patents or pend- 7 OF COUNSEL, LATHAM & WATKINS LLP random access memory (DRAM) chips from ing patent applications relating to a proposed February 1992 until June 1996. During this standard under consideration, only to assert time period, Rambus had pending patent he recent Federal Trade Commission the patents later – after the standard has been 1 applications with disclosures broad enough to opinion concerning Rambus, Inc. pro- adopted and the market “locked in.” cover technologies for the standards under vides important lessons for companies Manipulation of standards setting activi- T consideration. Using information from the ties may harm competition and chill stan- that participate in standards setting organi- JEDEC meetings, Rambus repeatedly dards setting efforts. In contrast, accurate and zations (SSOs). The FTC found that amended pending patent claims and filed a timely patent disclosures along with ex ante Rambus’ misconduct in concealing its series of divisional applications in order to license disclosure obligations promote pending patent applications from an SSO build a patent portfolio that would cover the informed decision-making by SSO members had harmed competition.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Chicago a Compiler-Based Online
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO A COMPILER-BASED ONLINE ADAPTIVE OPTIMIZER A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE DIVISION OF THE PHYSICAL SCIENCES IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE BY KAVON FAR FARVARDIN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS DECEMBER 2020 Copyright © 2020 by Kavon Far Farvardin Permission is hereby granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. To my cats Jiji and Pumpkin. Table of Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables ix Acknowledgments x Abstract xi I Introduction 1 1 Motivation 2 1.1 Adaptation . .4 1.2 Trial and Error . .5 1.3 Goals . .7 2 Background 9 2.1 Terminology . 10 2.2 Profile-guided Compilation . 11 2.3 Dynamic Compilation . 12 2.4 Automatic Tuning . 13 2.5 Finding Balance . 15 3 Thesis 16 4 Related Work 18 4.1 By Similarity . 18 4.1.1 Active Harmony . 18 4.1.2 Kistler’s Optimizer . 21 4.1.3 Jikes RVM . 23 4.1.4 ADAPT . 23 4.1.5 ADORE . 25 4.1.6 Suda’s Bayesian Online Autotuner . 26 4.1.7 PEAK . 26 4.1.8 PetaBricks . 27 iv 4.2 By Philosophy . 27 4.2.1 Adaptive Fortran . 28 4.2.2 Dynamic Feedback . 28 4.2.3 Dynamo . 28 4.2.4 CoCo . 29 4.2.5 MATE . 29 4.2.6 AOS . 30 4.2.7 Testarossa .
    [Show full text]
  • Programming Languages for Reasons That Are Mainly Sociological, the Software Industry Now Has Over 3,000 Programming Languages
    Case Example 6: Programming Languages For reasons that are mainly sociological, the software industry now has over 3,000 programming languages. SRM supports sizing and estimating for 89 of the most common languages, including combinations such as Java and HTML or Ruby and SQL. This example shows three languages. One is COBOL, a low-level programming language. The second is Java, a mid-level programming language. The third is Objective-C, a high-level language used by Apple for all of their software. The concept of “language levels” was first quantified by IBM circa 1973. The original definition was the number of assembly language statements needed to produce one statement in a target language. For example Java is a “level 6” language because it takes about 6 assembly statements to create the functionality of 1 Java statements. After IBM developed function point metrics the definition of language levels was expanded to source code statements per function point. Example 6: How Software Risk Master (SRM) Evaluates Programming Languages SRM supports 89 programming languages in 2017 New languages added as data becomes available SRM allows up to 3 different languages per estimate 1000 function points for all 3 Cases $10,000 per month for all 3 Cases Iterative development for all 3 Cases 132 local work hours per month for all 3 Cases Language levels developed by IBM circa 1973 2017 is the 30th anniversary of IFPUG function point metrics Low-Level Mid-level High-level Language Language Language Example Example Example Programming Language(s) COBOL
    [Show full text]
  • ISO/IEC JTC 1 Subcommittee 22 Chairman's Report
    ISO/IEC JTC 1 N6903 2002-10-03 Replaces: ISO/IEC JTC 1 Information Technology Document Type: Business Plan Document Title: SC 22 Business Plan/Chairman Report Document Source: SC 22 Chairman Project Number: Document Status: This document is circulated to JTC 1 National Bodies for review and consideration at the October 2002 JTC 1 Plenary meeting in Sophia Antipolis. Action ID: ACT Due Date: Distribution: Medium: Disk Serial No: No. of Pages: 31 Secretariat, ISO/IEC JTC 1, American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036; Telephone: 1 212 642 4932; Facsimile: 1 212 840 2298; Email: [email protected] ISO/IEC JTC 1 Subcommittee 22 Chairman's Report For the Period October 1, 2001 to September 30, 2002 John L. Hill Sun Microsystems 4429 Saybrook Lane Harrisburg, PA 17110 October 4, 2002 SC22 Chairman's Report Contents 1 Chairman's Report........................................................................................................................1 1.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................1 1.2 WG 3 - APL.................................................................................................................................1 1.3 WG 4 - COBOL...........................................................................................................................1 1.4 WG 5 - Fortran.............................................................................................................................2
    [Show full text]
  • Masterminds of Programming
    Download at Boykma.Com Masterminds of Programming Edited by Federico Biancuzzi and Shane Warden Beijing • Cambridge • Farnham • Köln • Sebastopol • Taipei • Tokyo Download at Boykma.Com Masterminds of Programming Edited by Federico Biancuzzi and Shane Warden Copyright © 2009 Federico Biancuzzi and Shane Warden. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. Published by O’Reilly Media, Inc. 1005 Gravenstein Highway North, Sebastopol, CA 95472 O’Reilly books may be purchased for educational, business, or sales promotional use. Online editions are also available for most titles (safari.oreilly.com). For more information, contact our corporate/institutional sales department: (800) 998-9938 or [email protected]. Editor: Andy Oram Proofreader: Nancy Kotary Production Editor: Rachel Monaghan Cover Designer: Monica Kamsvaag Indexer: Angela Howard Interior Designer: Marcia Friedman Printing History: March 2009: First Edition. The O’Reilly logo is a registered trademark of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Masterminds of Programming and related trade dress are trademarks of O’Reilly Media, Inc. Many of the designations used by manufacturers and sellers to distinguish their products are claimed as trademarks. Where those designations appear in this book, and O’Reilly Media, Inc. was aware of a trademark claim, the designations have been printed in caps or initial caps. While every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this book, the publisher and authors assume no responsibility for errors or omissions, or for damages resulting from the use of the information contained herein. ISBN: 978-0-596-51517-1 [V] Download at Boykma.Com CONTENTS FOREWORD vii PREFACE ix 1 C++ 1 Bjarne Stroustrup Design Decisions 2 Using the Language 6 OOP and Concurrency 9 Future 13 Teaching 16 2 PYTHON 19 Guido von Rossum The Pythonic Way 20 The Good Programmer 27 Multiple Pythons 32 Expedients and Experience 37 3 APL 43 Adin D.
    [Show full text]
  • On Fuzzing Concurrent Programs with C++ Atomics
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title On Fuzzing Concurrent Programs With C++ Atomics Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5rw7n0xs Author Snyder, Zachary Publication Date 2019 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE On Fuzzing Concurrent Programs With C++ Atomics THESIS submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Computer Engineering by Zachary Snyder Thesis Committee: Brian Demsky, Chair Rainer Doemer Alexandru Nicolau 2019 c 2019 Zachary Snyder TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES iv LIST OF TABLES v ACKNOWLEDGMENTS vi ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS vii 1 Introduction 1 2 Related Work 3 2.1 ModelCheckerswithRelaxedMemoryModels . ..... 3 2.2 RaceDetectorswithRelaxedMemoryModels . ..... 4 2.3 ConcurrentFuzzers ............................... 4 2.4 AdversarialMemory ............................... 5 2.5 TheC++MemoryModel ............................ 5 3 Motivating Example 6 4 Initial Assumptions 12 5 An Informal Operational Semantics of the C++ Memory Model 14 5.1 BasicTerms.................................... 15 5.2 Sequences ..................................... 15 5.3 Sequenced-Before ................................ 16 5.4 Reads-From .................................... 16 5.5 Happens-Before.................................. 16 5.6 ModificationOrder ................................ 18 5.7 CoherenceOrder ................................. 18 5.8 SequentialConsistency
    [Show full text]