DOCSLIB.ORG

Gens, 1863) Salamanca (ASSING, 2010) Oxypoda (Deropoda) Amicta Erichson, 1839 Cádiz, Algarve (ASSING, 2010)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gens, 1863) Salamanca (ASSING, 2010) Oxypoda (Deropoda) Amicta Erichson, 1839 Cádiz, Algarve (ASSING, 2010) SEGUNDA ACTUALIZACIÓN DEL CATÁLOGO IBEROBALEAR DE LOS ALEOCHARINAE (Coleoptera : Staphylinidae) Purificación Gamarra1 y Raimundo Outerelo2 1Centro Superior de Estudios Universitarios La Salle-UAM. C/La Salle, 10. 28023-Madrid. 2 Departamento de Biología Animal y Antropología Física. Facultad de Biología. UCM. C/ Antonio Novais, 2. 28040-Madrid. [Publicado originalmente en Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa nº 37 (2005): 1-81]. Actualizado hasta el 30 de abril 2014. El primer catálogo recogía datos hasta el 2005. En 2009 se realizó la primera actualización de la subfamilia. Desde mayo del 2009 hasta abril de 2014 se han producido una serie de modificaciones en la subfamilia Aleocharinae de la Península Ibérica, siendo debidos en gran parte a las revisiones realizadas de diversos géneros (ASSING, V., PASNIK,G., TRONQUET,M.) o a la publicación de resultados de la biodiversidad en diversas localidades (FERREIRA, GAMARRA ET ALS, MARTINS DA SILVA ET ALS, VIÑOLAS ET ALS, VORST) o resultados de muestreos en medios concretos como cuevas (TINAUT ET ALS, PÉREZ ET ALS) o carroña (PRADO E CASTRO ET ALS). Además hemos logrado publicaciones antiguas (GONZÁLEZ, M., 1963, WALKER, J.J., 1889 Y SCHEERPELTZ, O., 1961) que no pudimos consultar anteriormente y que han implicado modificaciones en las citas para la Península de algunas especies. De otros artículos desconocíamos de su existencia a pesar de estar publicados antes del 2009 (ASSING, V., 2001, 2002, MARUYAMA,M., 2006, Y PASNIK, G., 2006 a, 2006 b) y que han implicado modificaciones para el catálogo. Y por último otras publicaciones al ser cercanas a la fecha de la publicación de la actualización no fueron recogidas y han implicado modificaciones para la distribución de algunas especies (TINAUT,A. ET ALS, 2008 Y VIÑOLAS, A. & MASÓ, G., 2008). Actualmente la subfamilia comprende 86 géneros y 548 especies. Las principales novedades en la presente actualización son: Erratas detectadas en la publicación original y su primera actualización: Bolitocha (Ditropalia) obliqua sustituye a “oblicua” Thinonoma sustituye a “Trinonoma” Especies descritas nuevas para la ciencia. Aleochara (Heterochara) assingi Tronquet, 2009 de Burgos Ocyusa deminuta (Assing, 2010), Cousya de Murcia Oxypoda (Deropoda) lencinai Assing, 2010 de Murcia Oxypoda (Sphenoma) barbarica Assing, 2009 de Granada, Madrid y Marruecos Geostiba (Sipalotricha) alturgellensis Tronquet, 2012 de Lérida Especies citadas nuevas para la Península Ibérica. Aleochara (Ceranota) diversicollis Fauvel, 1900 Aleochara (Ceranota) hydrocephala Fauvel, 1900 Aleochara (Xenochara) funebris Wallaston, 1864 Acrotona oxypodoides Brundin, 1952 Atheta (s.str.) autumnalis (Erichson, 1839) Atheta (Badura) cauta (Erichson, 1837) [subgénero nuevo para la Península] Atheta (Badura) ischnocera Thomson, 1870 [subgénero nuevo para la Península] Atheta (Badura) macrocera (Thomson, 1856) [subgénero nuevo para la Península] Atheta (Microdota) minuscula (Brisout, 1860) Atheta (Philhygra) balcanicola Scheerpeltz, 1968 Atheta (Philhygra) hygrotopora (Kraatz, 1856) Atheta (Philhygra) luridipennis Mannerheim, 1830 Atheta (Philhygra) obtusangula Joy, 1913 Atheta (Philhygra) volans (Scriba, 1859) Atheta (Thinobaena) vestita (Gravenhorst, 1806) [subgénero nuevo para la Península] 1 Geostiba (Prionosipalia) myops (Kiesenwetter, 1850) Geostiba (Sibiota) rhunensis Fauvel, 1900 Geostiba (Tropogastrosipalia) montivaga (Brisout, 1863) Hydrosmecta eximia (Sharp, 1869) Thamiaraea cinnamomea (Gravenhorst, 1802) [género nuevo para la Península] Diestota (Apheloglossa) guadalupensis Pace, 1987 [género nuevo para la Península] Bolitochara (Ditropalia) bella Märkel, 1845 Gyrophaena manca Erichson, 1839 Heterota (Dendroleptusa) fumida (Erichson, 1839) [subgénero nuevo para la Península] Thecturota marchii (Dodero, 1802) [género nuevo para la Península] Pella excepta (Mulsant & Rey, 1861) Amarochara forticornis (Lacordaire, 1835) Haploglossa villosula (Stephens, 1832) [género nuevo para la Península] Mniusa incrassata (Mulsant & Rey, 1852) [género nuevo para la Península] Stichoglossa semirufa (Erichson, 1839) [género nuevo para la Península] Tachyusa objecta Mulsant & Rey, 1870 Placusa (Calpusa) adscita Erichson, 1839 Especies citadas nuevas para Portugal. Lomechusa paradoxa Gravenhorst, 1806 Lomechusoides strumosus (Fabricius, 1792) Especies citadas nuevas para España. Atheta (Philhygra) palustris (Kiessenwetter, 1844) Atheta (Tetropla) sodalis (Erichson, 1837) [material identificado de Madarcos, Madrid. Juan J. de la Rosa leg.] Especies de las que se concreta su distribución en la Península Ibérica. Aloconota cambrica (Wollaston, 1855) Guipuzcoa, Madrid (VORST, 2013) Bolitochara obliqua Erichson, 1839 Cantabria y Guadalajara (ASSING, 2014) Guipuzcoa (VORST, 2013) Pella erratica (Hagens, 1863) Salamanca (ASSING, 2010) Oxypoda (Deropoda) amicta Erichson, 1839 Cádiz, Algarve (ASSING, 2010) Cambios taxonómicos que afectan a la fauna de la Península Ibérica. (-) dejan de contar en el nº de especies (+) incrementa el nº de especies Atheta (Philhygra) meridionalis (Mulsant & Rey, 1853) cambia a género Brundinia Tottenham, 1949 (ASSING, 2010) [género nuevo para la Península] Atheta (Philhygra) marina (Mulsant & Rey, 1853) cambia a género Brundinia Tottenham, 1949 (ASSING, 2010) [género nuevo para la Península] (+) Geostiba (Sipalotricha) navarica Peyerimhoff, 1909 se revalida como especie válida, antes sinónimo de G. (Prionosipalia) chlorotica (Fairmaire, 1859) (TRONQUET, 2012) (-) Geostiba (Sipalotricha) unituberculata Assing, 2003 se hace sinonimia de G. (Prionosipalia) chlorotica (Fairmaire, 1859) (TRONQUET, 2012) El subgénero Typhlusida Casey, 1906 de Geostiba se hace sinonimia de Sibiota Casey, 1906 (ASSING, 2011) (-)Geostiba (Sipalotricha) ossalensis Assing, 2003 se hace sinonimia de G. (Sipalotricha) navarica Peyerimhoff, 1909 (TRONQUET, 2012) Geostiba (Tachyglutosipalia) comellinii Pace, 1983 se hace sinonimia de Geostiba (Tachyglutosipalia) nitida (Fauvel, 1871) (TRONQUET, 2012), esta especie no estaba citada en la Península. (-) Geostiba (Prionosipalia) gerundensis Pace, 2002 se hace sinonimia de G. (Prionosipalia) myops (Kiesenwetter, 1850) (TRONQUET, 2012) Zyras (Glossocantha) lugens (Gravenhorst, 1802) cambia a género Pella Stephens, 1835 (HLAVÁC ET ALS, 2011) Localidades del material identificado por los autores. [en gris en los mapas] que implica ampliación de la distribución en la Península Ibérica. - A Coruña: Parque de Santa Margarita. F.Losada leg. - Cádiz: Playas de Levante y Cotadura. Carmen Ruiz Delgado leg. - Granada: Santa María de la Alhambra. Alejandro González Medina leg. - Guipuzcoa: Aiako Harria Parque Naturala. Imanol Zabalegui leg. y S.Pagola leg. - Huelva: Playa Punta de la Canaleta. JJ:López Pérez leg. 2 - Madrid: Madarcos. Juan J. de la Rosa leg. - Madrid: Parque del Buen Retiro, Campo del Moro y Casa de Campo. P.Ruiz Heras leg. - Madrid: Somosierra. Juan J. de la Rosa leg. - Murcia: Sierra Espuña. Isabel Arnaldos & Dolores García leg. - Pontevedra: Cambados, Covelo, Mondariz, O Cabalo, O Cabo da Raña, Río Barragán y Soutomaior. María Calviño leg. - Sevilla: Lebrija. Esteban García leg. 3 Familia STAPHYLINIDAE Latreille, 1802 Subfamilia ALEOCHARINAE Fleming, 1821 Tribu ALEOCHARINI Fleming, 1821 (3 gen, 48 sp) GÉNERO TIPO: Piochardia Heyden, 1870 Género Aleochara Gravenhorst, 1802 (45 sp) ESPECIE TIPO: A.curtula (Goeze, 1777) Subgénero Aleochara Gravenhorst, 1802 DISTRIBUCIÓN: Holártica y Neotropical ESPECIE TIPO: A.curtula (Goeze, 1777) haematoptera Kraatz, 1858 brevipennis Gravenhorst, 1806 =crassicornis Boisduval & Lacordaire, 1835 =aurivillosa Jekel, 1873 nec Gyllenhal, 1827 =carnivora Gyllenhal, 1810 =haematodes Schauss, 1862 =cinctipennis Motschulky, 1858 =lateralis Heer, 1839 =concolor Stephens, 1832 =ripicola Mulsant & Rey, 1873 =fumata Erichson, 1837nec Gravenhorst,1802 =rufipennis Erichson, 1839 =moesta Stephens, 1839 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: Material identificado =morosa Heer, 1838 de Sierra Espuña (Murcia). =nigrovillosa Bernhauer, 1901 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: DISTRIBUCIÓN: Euromagrébica DISTRIBUCIÓN: Eurosiberiana lata Gravenhorst, 1802 =chinensis Bernhauer, 1802 curtula (Goeze, 1777), Staphylinus =fuscipes Erichson, 1839 =brachyptera (Fourcroy, 1795), Staphylinus PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: =brevis Heer, 1838 =crassicornis Donisthorpe, 1925 nec Boisduval & & Lacordaire, 1835 =bugnioni Fauvel, 1901 =discoidea Sharp, 1874 =discordia Duvivier, 1883 =fuscipes Gravenhorst, 1802 =limbata (Fabricius, 1801), Staphylinus =puncticepsThomson, 1860 =ripicola Tottenham, 1939 nec Mulsant & Rey, 1873 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: DISTRIBUCIÓN: Holártica 4 laticornis Kraatz, 1856 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: DISTRIBUCIÓN: Paleártica DISTRIBUCIÓN: Euroasiática milleri Kraatz, 1862 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: Subgénero Baryodma Thomson, 1858 ESPECIE TIPO: A.intricata Mannerheim, 1830 crassa Baudi, 1848 =eurynota Mulsant & Rey, 1861 =pulicaria Rosehauer, 1856 =punctatissima Scriba, 1866 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: DISTRIBUCIÓN: Eurosibírica Subgénero Ceranota Stephens, 1839 =Haplonotus Schmidt-Göbel, 1846 =Sorecocephala Bernhauer, 1902 ESPECIE TIPO: A.ruficornis Gravenhorst, 1802 Fauvel, 1900 diversicollis DISTRIBUCIÓN: Afromediterránea PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: intricata Mannerheim, 1831 =biguttata Heer, 1838 =bipunctata Erichson, 1837 nec Oliver, 1795 =celeris Stephens, 1832 =croatica Penecke, 1901 =terminata Stephens, 1832 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: DISTRIBUCIÓN: Tirrénica erythroptera Gravenhorst, 1806 PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: 5 =ontarionis (Casey, 1916), Baryodma PENÍNSULA IBÉRICA: Material identificado de Madarcos (Madrid),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Effects of Urbanisation and Urban Areas on Biodiversity
    From genes to habitats – effects of urbanisation and urban areas on biodiversity Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaflichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Gwendoline (Wendy) Altherr aus Trogen, Appenzell-Ausserrhoden Basel, 2007 Genehmigt von der Philosophisch–Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Peter Nagel, Prof. Dr. Patricia Holm, Prof. (em.) Dr. Bernhard Klausnitzer Basel, den 18. September 2007 Prof. Dr. Hans-Peter Hauri Dekan TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary 1 General introduction – biodiversity in the city 3 Chapter I – genetic diversity 21 Population genetic structure of the wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) in an urban environment Manuscript Chapter II – species diversity 47 How do small urban forest patches contribute to the biodiversity 47 of the arthropod fauna? Manuscript Leistus fulvibarbis Dejean – Wiederfund einer verschollenen 79 Laufkäferart (Coleoptera, Carabidae) in der Schweiz Veröffentlicht in den Mitteilungen der Entomologischen Gesellschaft Basel 56(4), 2006 Chapter III – habitat diversity 89 How do stakeholders and the legislation influence the allocation of green space on brownfield redevelopment projects? Five case studies from Switzerland, Germany and the UK Published in Business Strategy and the Environment 16, 2007 General discussion and conclusions 109 Acknowledgements 117 Curriculum Vitae 119 SUMMARY Urban areas are landscapes dominated by built-up structures for human use. Nevertheless, nature can still be found within these areas. Urban ecosystems can offer ecological niches, sometimes only found in cities. This biodiversity in the form of genetic diversity, species diversity and habitat diversity provided the structure of this thesis. First, we studied the effects of urbanisation on genetic diversity. We analysed the population structure of the wall lizard with highly variable genetic markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to the Staphylinidae in the Irish Coleoptera Annotated List, with a Revised Check-List of Irish Species
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society Number 41 (2017) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO THE STAPHYLINIDAE IN THE IRISH COLEOPTERA ANNOTATED LIST, WITH A REVISED CHECK-LIST OF IRISH SPECIES Jervis A. Good1 and Roy Anderson2 1Glinny, Riverstick, Co. Cork, Republic of Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 21 Belvoirview Park, Belfast BT8 7BL, Northern Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> Abstract Since the 1997 Irish Coleoptera – a revised and annotated list, 59 species of Staphylinidae have been added to the Irish list, 11 species confirmed, a number have been deleted or require to be deleted, and the status of some species and names require correction. Notes are provided on the deletion, correction or status of 63 species, and a revised check-list of 710 species is provided with a generic index. Species listed, or not listed, as Irish in the Catalogue of Palaearctic Coleoptera (2nd edition), in comparison with this list, are discussed. The Irish status of Gabrius sexualis Smetana, 1954 is questioned, although it is retained on the list awaiting further investgation. Key words: Staphylinidae, check-list, Irish Coleoptera, Gabrius sexualis. Introduction The Staphylinidae (rove-beetles) comprise the largest family of beetles in Ireland (with 621 species originally recorded by Anderson, Nash and O’Connor (1997)) and in the world (with 55,440 species cited by Grebennikov and Newton (2009)). Since the publication in 1997 of Irish Coleoptera - a revised and annotated list by Anderson, Nash and O’Connor, there have been a large number of additions (59 species), confirmation of the presence of several species based on doubtful old records, a number of deletions and corrections, and significant nomenclatural and taxonomic changes to the list of Irish Staphylinidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on Some European Aleocharinae, with Description of a New Rhopaletes Species from Croatia (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae)
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle © Décembre Vol. LIII pp. 191–215 «Grigore Antipa» 2010 DOI: 10.2478/v10191-010-0015-6 REMARKS ON SOME EUROPEAN ALEOCHARINAE, WITH DESCRIPTION OF A NEW RHOPALETES SPECIES FROM CROATIA (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIDAE) LÁSZLÓ ÁDÁM Abstract. Based on an examination of type and non-type material, ten species-group names are synonymised: Atheta mediterranea G. Benick, 1941, Aloconota carpathica Jeannel et Jarrige, 1949 and Atheta carpatensis Tichomirova, 1973 with Aloconota mihoki (Bernhauer, 1913); Amischa jugorum Scheerpeltz, 1956 with Amischa analis (Gravenhorst, 1802); Amischa strupii Scheerpeltz, 1967 with Amischa bifoveolata (Mannerheim, 1830); Atheta tricholomatobia V. B. Semenov, 2002 with Atheta boehmei Linke, 1934; Atheta palatina G. Benick, 1974 and Atheta palatina G. Benick, 1975 with Atheta dilaticornis (Kraatz, 1856); Atheta degenerata G. Benick, 1974 and Atheta degenerata G. Benick, 1975 with Atheta testaceipes (Heer, 1839). A new name, Atheta velebitica nom. nov. is proposed for Atheta serotina Ádám, 2008, a junior primary homonym of Atheta serotina Blackwelder, 1944. A revised key for the Central European species of the Aloconota sulcifrons group is provided. Comments on the separation of the males of Amischa bifoveolata and A. analis are given. A key for the identification of Amischa species occurring in Hungary and its close surroundings is presented. Remarks are presented about the relationships of Alevonota Thomson, 1858 and Enalodroma Thomson, 1859. The taxonomic status of Oxypodera Bernhauer, 1915 and Mycetota Ádám, 1987 is discussed. The specific status of Pella hampei (Kraatz, 1862) is debated. Remarks are presented about the relationships of Alevonota Thomson, 1858, as well as Mycetota Ádám, 1987, Oxypodera Bernhauer, 1915 and Rhopaletes Cameron, 1939.
    [Show full text]
  • On Some Athetini from Armenia and Adjacent Regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
    download www.zobodat.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 49/1 341-368 28.7.2017 On some Athetini from Armenia and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae) Volker ASSING & Jürgen VOGEL A b s t r a c t : Nine species of Athetini from Armenia are described and illustrated, eight of them for the first time: Atheta (Atheta) brevapicalis nov.sp. (South Armenia); A. (A.) hamulata nov.sp. (South Armenia); A. (Dimetrota) bispinosa nov.sp. (Armenia, Georgia); A. (D.) senticollis nov.sp. (North Armenia); A. (Oreostiba) altiviva BENICK, 1974 (widespread in Armenia); A. (O.) semialba nov.sp. (widespread in Armenia); A. (O.) abscisa nov.sp. (widespread in Armenia); A. (O.) brevitheca nov.sp. (widespread in Armenia); Liogluta armeniaca nov.sp. (Central and South Armenia). Three synonymies are proposed: Atheta hansseni STRAND, 1943 = A. brachati ASSING, 2013, nov.syn.; Liogluta granigera (KIESENWETTER, 1850) = L. trigemina (EPPELSHEIM, 1880), nov.syn.; L. funesta EPPELSHEIM, 1890 = L. nigrobusta ASSING, 2016, nov.syn. A lectotype is designated for Homalota trigemina EPPELSHEIM, 1880. K e y w o r d s : Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Aleocharinae, Athetini, Liogluta, Atheta, Armenia, taxonomy, new species, descriptions, new synonymies, new subgeneric assignment, lectotype designation. Introduction According to SCHÜLKE & SMETANA (2015), only ten species of Athetini had been recorded from Armenia by the end of 2014, seven of Atheta THOMSON, 1858, one of Hydrosmecta THOMSON, 1858, one of Liogluta THOMSON, 1858, and one of Pycnota MULSANT & REY, 1873. A preliminary research of faunistic literature dealing with the Staphylinidae fauna of Armenia revealed that this list is not complete. Nevertheless, in view of the fact that the Athetini is a mega-diverse tribe represented in the Palaearctic region by about 2000 species or more in numerous genera, it can be concluded that more than a hundred species should be present in Armenia and that next to nothing is known about the Athetini fauna of this country at present.
    [Show full text]
  • The Little Things That Run the City How Do Melbourne’S Green Spaces Support Insect Biodiversity and Promote Ecosystem Health?
    The Little Things that Run the City How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Luis Mata, Christopher D. Ives, Georgia E. Garrard, Ascelin Gordon, Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk, Kirsten Parris and Sarah A. Bekessy The Little Things that Run the City – How do Melbourne’s green spaces support insect biodiversity and promote ecosystem health? Report prepared for the City of Melbourne, November 2015 Coordinating authors Luis Mata Christopher D. Ives Georgia E. Garrard Ascelin Gordon Sarah Bekessy Interdisciplinary Conservation Science Research Group Centre for Urban Research School of Global, Urban and Social Studies RMIT University 124 La Trobe Street Melbourne 3000 Contributing authors Anna Backstrom, Kate Cranney, Tessa R. Smith, Laura Stark, Daniel J. Bickel, Saul Cunningham, Amy K. Hahs, Dieter Hochuli, Mallik Malipatil, Melinda L Moir, Michaela Plein, Nick Porch, Linda Semeraro, Rachel Standish, Ken Walker, Peter A. Vesk and Kirsten Parris. Cover artwork by Kate Cranney ‘Melbourne in a Minute Scavenger’ (Ink and paper on paper, 2015) This artwork is a little tribute to a minute beetle. We found the brown minute scavenger beetle (Corticaria sp.) at so many survey plots for the Little Things that Run the City project that we dubbed the species ‘Old Faithful’. I’ve recreated the map of the City of Melbourne within the beetle’s body. Can you trace the outline of Port Phillip Bay? Can you recognise the shape of your suburb? Next time you’re walking in a park or garden in the City of Melbourne, keep a keen eye out for this ubiquitous little beetle.
    [Show full text]
  • Hox-Logic of Body Plan Innovations for Social Symbiosis in Rove Beetles
    bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/198945. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 Hox-logic of body plan innovations for social symbiosis in rove beetles 2 3 Joseph Parker1*, K. Taro Eldredge2, Isaiah M. Thomas3, Rory Coleman4 and Steven R. Davis5 4 5 1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, 6 CA 91125, USA 7 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Division of Entomology, Biodiversity 8 Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 9 3Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street, New 10 York, NY 10032, USA 11 4Laboratory of Neurophysiology and Behavior, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY 10065, 12 USA 13 5Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, 14 USA 15 *correspondence: [email protected] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/198945. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 How symbiotic lifestyles evolve from free-living ecologies is poorly understood. In 2 Metazoa’s largest family, Staphylinidae (rove beetles), numerous lineages have evolved 3 obligate behavioral symbioses with ants or termites.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae: Athetini) 207-248 © Biologiezentrum Linz, Download
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 2015 Band/Volume: 0047_1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Assing Volker Artikel/Article: On the Nepalota fauna of China (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae: Athetini) 207-248 © Biologiezentrum Linz, download www.zobodat.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 47/1 207-248 31.7.2015 On the Nepalota fauna of China (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae: Athetini) Volker ASSING A b s t r a c t : Types and additonal material of the East Palaearctic aleocharine genus Nepalota PACE, 1987 are examined. Eleven species are (re-)described and illustrated: N. franzi PACE, 1987; N. globifera PACE, 1998; N. smetanai PACE, 1998; N. guangdongensis PACE, 2004; N. fellowesi PACE, 2004; N. crocea nov.sp. (Yunnan); N. cuneata nov.sp. (Yunnan); N. mocytoides nov.sp. (East Yunnan); N. prominula nov.sp. (Yunnan); N. tuberifera nov.sp. (Yunnan); N. daweiana nov.sp. (Yunnan). Five synonymies are proposed: N. gansuensis PACE, 1998 = N. qinlingmontis PACE, 2011, nov.syn.; N. globifera PACE, 1998 = N. caluoensis PACE, 2011, nov.syn., = N. daxuensis PACE, 2011, nov.syn.; N. guangdongensis PACE, 2004 = N. rougemonti PACE, 2011, nov.syn. = N. ruficollis PACE, 2011, nov.syn. Nepalota franzi is reported from China for the first time. In all, 35 valid species are currently known from the East Palaearctic, four of them of doubtful status (males unknown). Twenty species have been described or reliably recorded from China exclusive of Taiwan. The diversity is greatest in Yunnan (fourteen species, seven of them exclusive), followed by Hubei (five species; three exclusive); Sichuan (four species, one exclusive), Gansu and Shaanxi (three species each), Guangdong (two species), Zhejiang, Chongqing, Jiangxi, Guangxi, Guizhou, and Beijing (one species each).
    [Show full text]
  • Hox-Logic of Preadaptations for Social Insect Symbiosis in Rove Beetles
    bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/198945. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Hox-logic of preadaptations for social insect symbiosis in rove beetles Joseph Parker1*, K. Taro Eldredge2, Isaiah M. Thomas3, Rory Coleman3 and Steven R. Davis3,4 1Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA 2Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, and Division of Entomology, Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, USA 3Department of Genetics and Development, Columbia University, 701 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA 4Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY 10024, USA *correspondence: [email protected] bioRxiv preprint first posted online Oct. 5, 2017; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/198945. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. How symbiotic lifestyles evolve from free-living ecologies is poorly understood. Novel traits mediating symbioses may stem from preadaptations: features of free- living ancestors that predispose taxa to engage in nascent interspecies relationships. In Metazoa’s largest family, Staphylinidae (rove beetles), the body plan within the subfamily Aleocharinae is preadaptive for symbioses with social insects. Short elytra expose a pliable abdomen that bears targetable glands for host manipulation or chemical defense. The exposed abdomen has also been convergently refashioned into ant- and termite-mimicking shapes in multiple symbiotic lineages. Here we show how this preadaptive anatomy evolved via novel Hox gene functions that remodeled the ancestral coleopteran groundplan.
    [Show full text]
  • What Do Rove Beetles (Coleoptera: Staphy- Linidae) Indicate for Site Conditions? 439-455 ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft E.V
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Faunistisch-Ökologische Mitteilungen Jahr/Year: 2000-2007 Band/Volume: 8 Autor(en)/Author(s): Irmler Ulrich, Gürlich Stephan Artikel/Article: What do rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphy- linidae) indicate for site conditions? 439-455 ©Faunistisch-Ökologische Arbeitsgemeinschaft e.V. (FÖAG);download www.zobodat.at Faun.-6kol.Mitt 8, 439-455 Kiel, 2007 What do rove beetles (Coleoptera: Staphy- linidae) indicate for site conditions? By Ulrich Irmler & Stephan Giirlich Summary Although the rove beetle family is one of the most species rich insect families, it is ecologically rarely investigated. Little is known about the influence of environmental demands on the occurrence of the species. Thus, the present investigation aims to relate rove beetle assemblages and species to soil and forest parameters of Schleswig- Holstein (northern Germany). In the southernmost region of Schleswig-Holstein near Geesthacht, 65 sites were investigated by pitfall traps studying the relationship be­ tween the rove beetle fauna and the following environmental parameters: soil pH, organic matter content, habitat area and canopy cover. In total 265 rove beetle species have been recorded, and of these 69 are listed as endangered in Schleswig-Holstein. Four assemblages could be differentiated, but separation was weak. Wood area and canopy cover were significantly related with the rove beetle composition using a multivariate analysis. In particular, two assemblages of loosely wooded sites, or heath-like vegetation, were significantly differentiated from the densely forested assemblages by canopy cover and Corg-content of soil. Spearman analysis revealed significant results for only 30 species out of 80.
    [Show full text]
  • The Organism Atheta Coriaria Kraatz
    VKM Report 2020:12 Risk assessment of the biological control product Atheta-System with the organism Atheta coriaria Kraatz Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment VKM Report 2020:12 Risk assessment of the biological control product Atheta-System with the organism Atheta coriaria Kraatz Scientific opinion of the Panel on Plant Health of the Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment 30.11.2020 ISBN: 978-82-8259-351-9 ISSN: 2535-4019 Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM) Po 222 Skøyen N – 0213 Oslo Norway Phone: +47 21 62 28 00 Email: [email protected] vkm.no vkm.no/english Suggested citation: VKM, Johan A. Stenberg, Anders Nielsen, Micael Wendell, Beatrix Alsanius, Paal Krokene, Christer Magnusson, Mogens Nicolaisen, Iben M. Thomsen, Sandra A.I. Wright, Trond Rafoss (2020) Risk assessment of the biological control product Atheta- System with the organism Atheta coriaria Kraatz. Opinion of the Panel on Plant Health. VKM report 2020:12, ISBN: 978-82-8259-351-9, ISSN; 2535-4019. Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (VKM), Oslo, Norway. VKM Report 2020:12 Risk assessment of the biological control product Atheta- System with the organism Atheta coriaria Kraatz Preparation of the opinion. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food and Environment (Vitenskapskomiteen for mat og miljø, VKM) appointed a project group to draft the opinion. The project group consisted of two VKM members and a project manager from the VKM secretariat. Three referees commented on and reviewed the draft opinion. The Committee, by the Panel on Plant health assessed and approved the final opinion.
    [Show full text]
  • Tarset and Greystead Biological Records
    Tarset and Greystead Biological Records published by the Tarset Archive Group 2015 Foreword Tarset Archive Group is delighted to be able to present this consolidation of biological records held, for easy reference by anyone interested in our part of Northumberland. It is a parallel publication to the Archaeological and Historical Sites Atlas we first published in 2006, and the more recent Gazeteer which both augments the Atlas and catalogues each site in greater detail. Both sets of data are also being mapped onto GIS. We would like to thank everyone who has helped with and supported this project - in particular Neville Geddes, Planning and Environment manager, North England Forestry Commission, for his invaluable advice and generous guidance with the GIS mapping, as well as for giving us information about the archaeological sites in the forested areas for our Atlas revisions; Northumberland National Park and Tarset 2050 CIC for their all-important funding support, and of course Bill Burlton, who after years of sharing his expertise on our wildflower and tree projects and validating our work, agreed to take this commission and pull everything together, obtaining the use of ERIC’s data from which to select the records relevant to Tarset and Greystead. Even as we write we are aware that new records are being collected and sites confirmed, and that it is in the nature of these publications that they are out of date by the time you read them. But there is also value in taking snapshots of what is known at a particular point in time, without which we have no way of measuring change or recognising the hugely rich biodiversity of where we are fortunate enough to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecitocharini Clade of Aleocharine Rove Beetles (Insecta)
    Zoologica Scripta Molecular phylogeny of the Athetini–Lomechusini– Ecitocharini clade of aleocharine rove beetles (Insecta) HALLVARD ELVEN,LUTZ BACHMANN &VLADIMIR I. GUSAROV Submitted: 16 December 2011 Elven, E., Bachmann, L. & Gusarov V. I. (2012). Molecular phylogeny of the Athetini– Accepted: 7 May 2012 Lomechusini–Ecitocharini clade of aleocharine rove beetles (Insecta). —Zoologica Scripta, doi:10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00553.x 41, 617–636. It has previously been shown that the Aleocharinae tribes Athetini and Lomechusini form Re-use of this article is permitted in a well-supported clade, which also includes the small Neotropical tribe Ecitocharini. How- accordance with the Terms and ever, neither Athetini nor Lomechusini were recovered as monophyletic. In this study, we Conditions set out at http:// addressed the basal phylogenetic relationships among the three tribes using sequence data wileyonlinelibrary.com/onlineopen# OnlineOpen_Terms from (i) a mitochondrial fragment covering the COI, Leu2 and COII genes; (ii) a mito- chondrial fragment covering part of the 16S gene, the Leu1 gene and part of the NADH 1 gene; and (iii) a part of the nuclear 18S gene, for 68 Athetini, 33 Lomechusini and 2 Eci- tocharini species, plus representatives from 10 other tribes. The athetine subtribe Geostibi- na was recovered as sister group to the ‘true Lomechusini’, which included the type genus Lomechusa. The two clades formed a sister group to the main Athetini clade, which also included Ecitocharini and the ‘false Lomechusini’, a group of New World
    [Show full text]