Fisher Communications, Inc

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fisher Communications, Inc D S Fisher Communications, Inc. > $ sa in w ga lo d lo w Th th fa > re co Fisher Annual a st w ic do Report 02 try p an p le an na pe sp N W I a co CORP: DOCUMENT: YEAR: sp of Fisher fo Communications, Annual Report / 10-K 2002 b Inc. an ac DOC Fi Dear Shareholders Hopes for a profitable 2002 did not the cornerstones of our restructuring program: > materialize. Consolidated net loss was concentrating on our core businesses; increasing $.23 a share in 2002. This includes gains on the revenue base; streamlining operations and sale of real estate and net gain on derivative controlling expenses; and selling selected assets to instruments. If, for purposes of comparison pay down debt. with 2001 results, the real estate and derivative gains, as well as a charge for expensing deferred Concentrating on Core Businesses In Fisher’s loan costs in connection with refinancing of 1999 annual report I stated that “Fisher is focusing debt, were excluded from 2002 results, the net its efforts and resources on becoming a fully loss per share would have been $1.35, compared integrated communications and media company.” with a $.96 per share loss reported in 2001. So began a series of actions involving the acquisition of 11 television stations in 1999, sale of Fisher’s The broad context for Fisher’s performance and legacy flour milling businesses in 2001, construction that of many other Northwest companies is a of Fisher Plaza, and the sale of commercial real faltering national economy and an even weaker estate and other selected assets in 2002 and 2003. regional economy. Nationally, consumer confidence continued to wane, and in late February 2003 hit During this same period, we began restructuring the a nine-year low due to lack of job creation, a wary corporation to increase efficiency and effectiveness. stock market, fear of terrorism, and a possible war The name change from Fisher Companies Inc. to with Iraq. These pressures are reflected in signif- Fisher Communications, Inc. signaled the move from icantly reduced advertising and one of the worst a holding company structure to a single corporate downturns in the history of the broadcasting indus- entity with operating subsidiaries. Eliminated in this try. Here in the Puget Sound region, employment is process were the boards of directors of the three predicted to move sideways for the rest of the year, operating companies: Fisher Properties, Fisher Mills, and regional employment is not expected to reach its and Fisher Broadcasting. At the same time, as we pre-recession level until 2005. State unemployment look to eliminate unnecessary processes and levels at the end of January 2003 showed Oregon reduce overhead, we also must focus on our busi- and Washington ranking second and third in the ness operations where sustained profitability can nation. Given that Fisher Communications’ financial be created. performance is largely dependent on advertising spending driven by the national and Pacific Increasing the Revenue Base Revenue is the Northwest economies, our recovery will take time. lifeblood of all commercial enterprises, but especially critical to those with high fixed costs. With these external conditions as a backdrop, Unlike businesses that are able to reduce pro- I am convinced the best course of action is to duction when confronted with declining sales, continue implementing our restructuring plan with our broadcasting services must be maintained speed and determination. Following is an overview continuously, without curtailment, regardless of the of the company’s changing focus over the last level of our advertising revenue. It takes a lot of four years, the progress to date on managing the people, capital, and equipment to run broadcasting business drivers that we believe we can influence, stations effectively. Station management is working and a look forward to what we will attempt to hard to recruit and train salespeople who under- accomplish in 2003. In particular, we will address stand that commitment, and who can thrive in our DOCUMENT: SECTION: PAGE: Fisher ar02 Letter to shareholders I. Letter to Letter to Shareholders Shareholde (cont.) (cont.) competitive markets. In addition, for stations to and support our broadcasting businesses, or spend Center and F be financially successful, they must be seen as roughly twice that amount and create expanded The property valued members of their local communities. Fisher digital facilities and a flexible digital hub, plus seek shut down b is committed to producing quality local program- to produce a return on the total investment by media servic ming that includes talent and features not available offering office and technology space to companies Entertainme on competing stations, as well as developing formats with similar technological requirements. sold, absorb that help create strong and enduring market to-day mana positions. With the second phase complete except for tenant from Media improvements, we believe that both these object- So, in April 2002, Fisher Communications decided ives can be met. KOMO TV and our three Seattle Selling Sele to enter into a six-year agreement with the Baseball radio stations now reside in the East Building and we announc Club of Seattle for play-by-play broadcasts of work closely together. The 200,000-square-foot mercial real Seattle Mariners baseball on KOMO AM. An East Building is now near full occupancy by Fisher it became ev important aspect of this decision was that Fisher’s operations and third-party tenants. We are currently assets were local and regional radio and television interests in discussion with numerous prospects to occupy priate, we be parallel the fan base of Seattle Mariners baseball. much of the 100,000 square feet of available properties. T To gain the most from broadcasting Mariners space in the recently completed West Building. group of pro baseball, we simultaneously conducted research to Fisher Indus determine the optimal format for creating additional Streamlining Operations and Controlling Center in Ke value in terms of rating, share, and cume from this Expenses Making operations more efficient and Technology exclusive programming. An all-news radio format controlling costs are two sides of the same coin. these sales emerged as the clear winner, which we believe is Rest assured that the company is constantly our original e capable of producing substantial additional revenue seeking to reduce all expenses. But it is in the modi- Fisher Busin over the coming years through audience “recycling” fication of structure that we expect to see the most and West La into adjacent time periods on KOMO AM and to immediate and long-term benefits to the company. complementary assets such as our other Seattle In January 20 stations, KOMO TV, KVI AM, and KPLZ FM. The Since broadcasting is our central business, it’s agreement to goal of these program and format changes is to vitally important that the supporting processes television sta propel KOMO AM from a ranking of 18th among all and management are as efficient as possible. in Columbus radio stations in the Seattle market to a leadership Accordingly, we are in the process of initiating an Fisher’s broa position among the market’s top ten, where it upstream merger of Fisher Broadcasting Company Washington would join the company of its sister AM station, KVI. into Fisher Communications. This consolidation will entail the transfer of some personnel and functions Some of the statem passages containing Fisher Plaza represents another major investment to corporate, and others into the various operating also include any oth Report include, with in our broadcasting operations and an important units. In addition, Fisher’s corporate functions will news format of KOM other company-owne source of additional revenue for the company. move from downtown Seattle to Fisher Plaza. of initiating an upstr return on total inves Several years ago, Fisher was faced with the need statement that Fishe Fisher’s broadcastin for updated broadcasting facilities in Seattle to We expect to discontinue operations of Fisher’s in our forward-lookin due to the weak ec accommodate digital broadcasting requirements. other two subsidiaries — Fisher Properties and attract the advertisin determine there are The options were to spend approximately $60 Fisher Media Services — and to sell the remaining the Company may b property in Seattle, t million on a new studio building that would upgrade two commercial properties, West Lake Union we may be unable t obtain FCC approva located in Washingt reports filed with the DOCUMENT: SECTION: PAGE: DOCUMENT: Fisher ar02 Letter to shareholders II. Fisher ar0 Letter to F Shareholders w (cont.) Center and Fisher Business Center, during 2003. February 2003, we sold our common stock hold- O The property management operation will be sold or ings of the Weyerhaeuser Company and Terabeam W shut down by the end of the year. The remaining Corporation. P media services businesses, including Fisher W Entertainment, Fisher Pathways, and Civia, will be With these transactions and additional sales of E sold, absorbed, or shut down. Ownership and day- selected assets, our goal is to reduce Fisher’s long- C to-day management of Fisher Plaza will be moved term debt by approximately one half during 2003. D from Media Services to Fisher Communications. As of this writing, we have reduced borrowings by S C more than $20 million since year-end 2002. A Selling Selected Assets In November of 2001, S we announced the intended sale of Fisher’s com- I trust that this discussion of the challenges under- S mercial real estate properties. When, early in 2002, gone and the outline of changes implemented in C it became evident that offers for the portfolio of 2002 and early 2003 have provided some detail M assets were below the value we believed appro- and insight into the restructuring plan announced S priate, we began considering offers for individual earlier, on February 12, 2003.
Recommended publications
  • Cross-Platform Measurement Helps Local Stations Add Value to Broadcast and Digital
    Case Study Cross-Platform Measurement Helps Local Stations Add Value to Broadcast and Digital Ecosystem The local game is changing. Daily deal sites like Groupon and LivingSocial.com in the U.S. have altered the way businesses reach out to consumers. For years, traditional local media – TV, radio and newspapers – has struggled with how to use their websites to complement their offerings and provide more to local businesses. Local TV stations, for example, have typically put video of reports or entire newscasts on their sites. As gateways to local news and events, websites for TV stations typically attract large numbers of visitors, yet it has been difficult to determine the effects and value of those visitors. The challenge has been leveraging “digital touchpoints,” quantifying their benefits and creating new models to attract more from local and national businesses who advertise and encourage those who otherwise might not advertise online at all. As new technology, such as location-based couponing, measurement capabilities, and integrated TV and Internet audience measurement, brings precision to local advertising, marketers are gaining the ability to better package local ad inventory to reach customers and amplify local TV audience value, combining TV and Online. In turn, the precision enables greater efficiency, meaning the opportunity to attract advertisers to spend more, locally. In other words, there’s a fortune to be made in your own backyard. Background Working with this valuable information, Fisher Communications Inc., an innovative local media company with TV, radio, Internet and mobile operations, found themselves positioned to provide their advertiser clients one-stop TV and digital local exposure.
    [Show full text]
  • Fisher Communications, Inc
    UNITEDSTATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON D.C 20549-3010 DIVISION OF CORPORATION FINANCE December 19 2007 Andrew Bor Perkins Coie 1201 Third Avenue Suite 4800 Seattle WA 98101-3099 Re Fisher Communications Inc Incoming letter dated November 29 2007 Dear Mr Bor This is in response to your letters dated November 29 2007 and December 11 2007 concerning the shareholder proposal submitted to Fisher Communications by GAMCO Asset Management Inc We also have received letter from the proponent dated December 2007 Our response is attached to the enclosed photocopy of your correspondence By doing this we avoid having to recite or summarize the facts set forth in the correspondence Copies of all of the correspondence also will be provided to the proponent In connection with this matter your attention is directed to the enclosure which sets forth brief discussion of the Divisions informal procedures regarding shareholder proposals Sincerely Jonathan Ingram Deputy Chief Counsel Enclosures cc Peter Goldstein Director of Regulatory Affairs GAMCO Asset Management Inc One Corporate Center Rye NY 10580-1435-1422 December 19 2007 Response of the Office of Chief Counsel Division of Corporation Finance Re Fisher Communications Inc Incoming letter dated November 29 2007 The proposal relates to acquisitions for view that Fisher Communications There appears to be some basis your may Fisher Communications received it exclude the proposal under rule 14a-8e2 because after the deadline for submitting proposals We note in particular your representations
    [Show full text]
  • Download the SCEC Final Report (Pdf Format)
    Seattle Commission on Electronic Communication Steve Clifford Michele Lucien Commission Chair Fisher Communications/KOMO-TV Former CEO, KING Broadcasting Betty Jane Narver Rich Lappenbusch University of Washington Commission Vice Chair Microsoft Amy Philipson UWTV David Brewster Town Hall Vivian Phillips Family Business Margaret Gordon University of Washington Josh Schroeter Founder, Blockbuy.com Bill Kaczaraba NorthWest Cable News Ken Vincent KUOW Radio Norm Langill One Reel Jean Walkinshaw KCTS-TV Commission Staff City Staff Anne Fennessy Rona Zevin Cocker Fennessy City of Seattle Kevin Evanto JoanE O’Brien Cocker Fennessy City of Seattle Table of Contents Final Report Letter from the Commission Chair ......................................................................... 2 Executive Summary .................................................................................................. 3 Diagram of TV/Democracy Portal.......................................................................... 4 Commission Charge & Process ............................................................................... 6 Current Environment................................................................................................. 8 Recommended Goal, Mission Statement & Service Statement...................... 13 Commission Recommendations ............................................................................ 14 Budget & Financing ................................................................................................ 24 Recommended
    [Show full text]
  • Seattle a Digital Community Still in Transition Jessica Durkin, Tom Glaisyer, and Kara Hadge, Media Policy Initiative June 2010, Release 2.0
    New America Foundation An Information Community Case Study: Seattle A digital community still in transition Jessica Durkin, Tom Glaisyer, and Kara Hadge, Media Policy Initiative June 2010, Release 2.0 Seattle, Washington, could be considered a city singularly suited to develop a healthy democracy in the digital age. The city government, citizens and business have created a productive environment for the next generation of information-sharing and community engagement. Years of economic growth and relative prosperity have fostered new, superior practices in news and information. Yet, losing a major print newspaper, as Seattle did when The Seattle Post-Intelligencer closed, adversely affects a community, by leaving it with one less place to provide public service journalism, stories about people and general community updates. In parallel, Seattle has been at the center of an explosion of alternative news outlets, especially online, which has created a critical mass of information portals for geographic and social communities. As the Knight Report, Informing Communities: Sustaining Democracy in a Digital Age, highlights, it is important to understand that there are three important elements to be considered as we analyze media and democracy in the 21st century: • availability of relevant and credible information to all Americans and their communities; • capacity of individuals to engage with information; and • individual engagement with information and the public life of the community. However, despite the relative vibrancy of the media scene, and even with all its demographic and other advantages, it is unclear how much of this innovation is sustainable. The local web is littered with websites that are no longer updated, and few of the startups boast anything like the journalistic firepower or profitability of the papers of the past.
    [Show full text]
  • Whut M-Eas Final 092012
    NEWS RELEASE FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE WHUT-TV Becomes First TV Station in Nation’s Capital to Support New Mobile Emergency Alert System Mobile DTV Broadcasting to Deliver Rich Media Alerts: Video, Audio, Photos, Maps WASHINGTON, Sept. 20, 2012 – WHUT-TV today became the first television station in the Nation’s Capital to commit to launching the new Mobile Emergency Alert System (M-EAS), a life-saving application of mobile digital TV that delivers rich media emergency alerts to mobile and handheld devices. Announced at a Capitol Hill event celebrating the commercial launch of mobile TV, WHUT’s role is significant because its signal reaches more than 2 million area viewers, providing a lifeline to citizens and first-responders alike during times of natural and man- made disasters. Howard University Television’s participation in the implementation phase of M-EAS also is noteworthy because of WHUT’s status as the only Public Broadcasting Service (PBS) member station licensed to and operated by a predominantly African- American institution. The new M-EAS is designed to leverage mobile digital TV broadcasting to deliver reliable, rich media alerts anywhere, anytime. Prototype LG mobile phones demonstrated on Capitol Hill today offer not only audio and visual indications of emergency alerts, but also include a vibrating mode to notify all users (including those who might be visually impaired) about an emergency Jefferi K. Lee, 30-year industry veteran and general manager of WHUT-TV, called M-EAS a “prime example of our strategic mission to serve
    [Show full text]
  • Broadcasters in the Internet Age
    G.research, LLC November 27, 2018 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1422 g.research Tel (914) 921-5150 www.gabellisecurities.com Broadcasters in the Internet Age Brett Harriss G.research, LLC 2018 (914) 921-8335 -Please Refer To Important Disclosures On The Last Page Of This Report- G.research, LLC November 27, 2018 One Corporate Center Rye, NY 10580-1422 g.research Tel (914) 921-5150 www.gabellisecurities.com OVERVIEW The television industry is experiencing a tectonic shift of viewership from linear to on-demand viewing. Vertically integrated behemoths like Netflix and Amazon continue to grow with no end in sight. Despite this, we believe there is a place in the media ecosystem for traditional terrestrial broadcast companies. SUMMARY AND OPINION We view the broadcasters as attractive investments. We believe there is the potential for consolidation. On April 20, 2017, the FCC reinstated the Ultra High Frequency (UHF) discount giving broadcasters with UHF stations the ability to add stations without running afoul of the National Ownership Cap. More importantly, the current 39% ownership cap is under review at the FCC. Given the ubiquitous presence of the internet which foster an excess of video options and media voices, we believe the current ownership cap could be viewed as antiquated. Should the FCC substantially change the ownership cap, we would expect consolidation to accelerate. Broadcast consolidation would have the opportunity to deliver substantial synergies to the industry. We would expect both cost reductions and revenue growth, primarily in the form of increased retransmission revenue, to benefit the broadcast stations and networks.
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted -- for Public Inspection
    REDACTED -- FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION July 19, 2017 By Electronic Filing Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street SW Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: MB Docket No. 17-179 Tribune Media Company and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. Consolidated Applications for Consent to Transfer Control Dear Ms. Dortch: Pursuant to the Protective Order in this proceeding,1 Tribune Media Company hereby submits the enclosed unredacted, Highly Confidential Information for inclusion in the record of the referenced proceeding. The enclosed submission consists entirely of Highly Confidential Information. Accordingly, pursuant to paragraph 7 of the Protective Order, access to the submission is limited to Outside Counsel and Outside Consultants and their employees who have executed and filed the Acknowledgement attached as Appendix B to the Protective Order. The information in the submission previously was included as Attachments V and VII to the Comprehensive Exhibit to the Consolidated Applications with a request for confidentiality under Section 0.459 of the Rules. It is being resubmitted herewith in conformity with the requirements of the Protective Order. Separately, also pursuant to the Protective Order, Tribune is submitting (1) two copies of the submission in an encrypted .pdf file to David Roberts of the Media Bureau, and (2) a 1 Tribune Media Company and Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., Consolidated Applications for Consent to Transfer Control, Protective Order, DA 17-678 (July 14, 2017) (the “Protective Order”). DC: 6472326-1 Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary July 19, 2017 Page 2 REDACTED -- FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION redacted, public version of this submission (as reflected in Attachments V and VII to the Comprehensive Exhibit) via ECFS.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Private Equity? Privateequityatwork.Com
    1 Corporate FM - website: www.fmfilm.com/ Articles and Links What is Private Equity? privateequityatwork.com http://youtu.be/5IPG7GYPzUo http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IPG7GYPzUo What is Private Equity? by Kevin McKinney on December 12, 2012 What is Private Equity? How do they make their money? The way a firm makes profit can say much about how it behaves. For instance, Private Equity makes money off of fees taken from investors and from maintenance fees from the companies that they own. They can make substantial commissions if they can sell the companies they own for a profit. This means that short-term profits that make the company appear attractive to a buyer are more important than costly long-term business infrastructure improvements that might not pay off for 10 years. This lack of long-term motivation has hurt Clearchannel because they stopped investing in their employees in favor of short-term profits by cutting as much staff as possible. Private Equity also makes money by shifting debt onto others. This is called an LBO or “Leveraged Buyout”. No Skin in the game. The complaint about the LBO deal is that Private Equity firms are not responsible for debt payments. Those come out of the company checkbooks of the very companies that they are buying. Even though Private Equity bought Clearchannel, they dodged the responsibility of paying off the debt by placing that squarely on Clearchannel itself. This is unexpectedly simple and legal. Clearchannel has to pay their debt to the bank and fees to the firm that gave it that debt.
    [Show full text]
  • President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 74A) at the Gerald R
    Scanned from the President's Daily Diary Collection (Box 74A) at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library NATIONAL ARCHIVE AND RECORDS SERVICE WITHDRAWAL SHEET (PRESI ENTIAL LI RARIES) FOAM OF DOCUMENT CORRESPONDENTS OR TITLE DATE RESTRICTION A;ppeVltA,' y I'A'I . [Rfolac~.eJ top~ QVat'loJJle in open ~ I ·'~ FII.E LOCATION "l"'o.. 'I " 'VY"(."S1 J.e"~s ~o.l '-I J.J\'o.r,,! ~ol.l.ar ~ \t M4r~h I~ \c;, 5 " RESTRICTION CODES (AI Closed by E'x!!Cl./tivo Order 12358 governing access to nalional securltv information . (8) Closed by statute or by dIll agency which orIginated the document, Ie) CI In c:cordan'".e with restrictions contained In the donor's deed of gift. THE WHITE HOUSE THE DAILY DIARY OF PRESIDENT GERALD R. FORD PLACE DAY BEGAN DATE (Mo.. Day, Yr.) THE WHITE HOUSE MARCH 12, 1975 \." WASHINGTON, D.C. TIME DAY 7:05 a.m. WEDNESDA' -PHONE TIME "0 1:: .~'" ACTIVITY 0:'" ..: II I In Out "" ..: 7:05 The President had breakfast. 7:38 The President went to the Oval Office. 7:42 8:02 The President met with: David A. Peterson, Chief, Central Intelligence Agency/Office of Current Intelligence (CIA/OCI) White House Support Staff Lt. Gen. Brent,Scowcroft, Deputy Assistant for National Security Affairs The President met with: 8:02 8:40 Robert T. Hartmann, Counsellor 8:19 8:40 John T. Calkins, Executive Assistant to Mr. Hartmann 8:40 9:00 The President met with his Assistant, Donald H. Rumsfeld. 9:00 9:18 The President met with his Counsellor, John O.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economics of Retransmission Consent
    E MPIRIS L L C THE ECONOMICS OF RETRANSMISSION CONSENT † JEFFREY A. EISENACH , PH.D. March 2009 † Chairman and Managing Partner, Empiris LLC and Adjunct Professor, George Mason University Law School. I am grateful to several commenters for helpful suggestions. Any remaining errors are my own. Support for this paper was provided by the National Association of Broadcasters. THE ECONOMICS OF RETRANSMISSION CONSENT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Congress created retransmission consent in 1992 to ensure that broadcasters would be able to negotiate in a free marketplace for fair compensation for their programming. Examining retransmission consent from an economic perspective, this study demonstrates that retransmission consent achieves Congress’ intended purpose of establishing a market based mechanism to ensure that broadcasters receive an economically efficient level of compensation for the value of their signals. This compensation ultimately benefits consumers by enriching the quantity, diversity, and quality of available programming, including local broadcast signals. In particular, the evidence demonstrates that: • The market for television programming is highly competitive. The sellers’ side of the video programming market (broadcasters) is relatively unconcentrated and is becoming less concentrated while the buyers’ side (the multichannel video program distributors market) is experiencing consolidation at both the national and local levels. In 2006, the four MVPDs with the largest shares served 63 percent of all MVPD subscribers, up from 50 percent in 2002. National networks depend on just four purchasers to reach nearly 70 percent of all MVPD subscribers nationwide. Thus, broadcasters do not have monopoly power, and are not in a position to extract excessive retransmission consent fees from cable operators or other program distributors.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Impact of the FCC's TV Duopoly Rule Relaxation on Minority And
    The Impact of the FCC’s TV Duopoly Rule Relaxation on Minority and Women Owned Broadcast Stations 1999-2006 By: Prof. Allen S. Hammond, IV, Santa Clara University School of Law, Founding Director, BroadBand Institute of California (BBIC) With: Prof. Barbara O’Connor, California State University, Sacramento And Prof. Tracy Westin, University of Colorado Consultants: Prof. Alexander Field, Santa Clara University And Assoc. Prof. Catherine Sandoval, Santa Clara University School of Law, Co-Director, BBIC 1 The Impact of the FCC’s TV Duopoly Rule Relaxation on Minority and Women Owned Broadcast Stations 1999-20061 Executive Summary This study was commissioned to ascertain the impact of the Television Duopoly Rule (TVDR) on minority and female ownership of television broadcast stations. Currently, the only FCC rule deemed to be favorable to minority and female broadcast ownership is the Failed Station Solicitation Rule (FSSR) of the TVDR. The TVDR originally prohibited the ownership of more than one television broadcast station in a market. In 1996, due to industry efforts to protect market gains realized through the use of local management agreements (LMAs)2, the TVDR was amended to allow the ownership of two stations in certain markets provided only one of the two was a VHF station and the overlapping signals of the two owned stations originated from separate albeit contiguous markets. In addition, the acquired station was required to be economically “failing” or “failed” or unbuilt. In an effort to afford market access to potential minority and female owners, the FCC required the owners of the station to be acquired to provide public notice of its availability for acquisition.
    [Show full text]
  • US1 Distribution
    1 US1 Distribution PR Newswire’s U.S. Distribution delivers your messages across the most trusted and comprehensive content distribution network in the industry, providing the broadest reach and sharpest targeting available. Business Alabama Monthly - Birmingham Bureau ALABAMA (Birmingham) Magazine Cherokee County Herald (Centre) Cullman Times (Cullman) Coastal Living Magazine (Birmingham) Decatur Daily (Decatur) Southern Living (Birmingham) Dothan Eagle (Dothan) Southern Breeze (Gulf Shores) Enterprise Ledger (Enterprise) Civil Air Patrol News (Maxwell AFB) Fairhope Courier (Fairhope) Business Alabama Monthly (Mobile) Courier Journal (Florence) Prime Montgomery (Montgomery) Florence Times Daily (Florence) Fabricating & Metalworking Magazine (Pinson) Times Daily (Florence) News Service Fort Payne Times-Journal (Fort Payne) Gadsden Times, The (Gadsden) Associated Press - Birmingham Bureau (Birmingham) Latino News (Gadsen) Associated Press - Mobile Bureau (Mobile) News-Herald (Geneva) Associated Press - Montgomery Bureau Huntsville Times, The (Huntsville) (Montgomery) Daily Mountain Eagle, The (Jasper) Newspaper Fairhope Courier, The (Mobile) Mobile Press-Register (Mobile) The Sand Mountain Reporter (Albertville) Montgomery Advertiser (Montgomery) The Outlook (Alexander) Opelika-Auburn News (Opelika) Anniston Star (Anniston) Pelican, The (Orange Beach) Athens News Courier (Athens) The Citizen of East Alabama (Phenix City) Atmore Advance (Atmore) Scottsboro Daily Sentinel (Scottsboro) Lee County Eagle, The (Auburn) Selma Times Journal (Selma)
    [Show full text]