DOCSLIB.ORG

AUSTIN PARK MASTER PLAN PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY November 15, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

CITY OF CLEARLAKE AUSTIN PARK MASTER PLAN PROPOSED MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY November 15, 2017 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL INITIAL STUDY PUBLIC REVIEW The draft Initial Study for this project was circulated for public review between September 28 and October 30, 2017. This circulation included distribution to the California Clearinghouse. The only comments received were from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board as described in the attached letter of October 26, 2017. All comments of this letter made a number of recommendations and suggestions on various permits necessary to implement the project. The letter indicates that the initial study should evaluate potential impacts to both surface and groundwater quality. The draft Initial Study already included all recommendations and identified various permits necessary per the letter. Several mitigation measures were included in the draft Initial Study so there is was no need to make any changes to the draft. Sections IV, Biological Resources Evaluation and IX, Hydrology and Water Quality provide for a complete analysis of both surface and groundwater quality. Complete permitting requirements noted in the letter have been addressed with the following: Mitigation Measures: 13. Prior to issuance of a building or grading permit, or conducting any disturbance within the bed and bank of Clear Lake and the adjacent riparian vegetation, and to protect a 0.03-acre area of willow riparian (a natural community of special concern) which occurs along the shoreline of Clear Lake, a Lake and Stream Alteration Agreement shall be obtained from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (as applicable for Phase II of the Master Plan). 21. Prior to commencing any work within or below the ordinary high-water mark of Clear Lake the following permits shall be secured (as applicable for Phase II of the Master Plan). All permit conditions shall be implemented (as applicable for Phase II of the master plan): i. Section 404 Permit from Corps (from the US Army Corp of Engineers) ii. Section 401 Water Quality Certification (from the Regional Water Quality Control Board) iii. Lease agreement and encroachment permit (from the State Lands Commission) City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 1 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 iv. A 1602 Lake Alteration Agreement (from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife). A Lake Alteration Agreement is also required prior to any work within the riparian area or bank of Clear Lake. 22. A 2081 Incidental Take Permit from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife may be required for impacts on the Clear Lake hitch, a state listed fish species. Prior to in- water work, the Project will implement the following measures (as applicable for Phase II of the Master Plan): b. A survey by a qualified biologist shall be conducted prior to any inshore work to determine the presence of any inshore vegetation and, therefore determine whether or not a 2081 permit will be required. The survey shall be conducted during the period when inshore vegetation is evident and identifiable, between June and October. If no inshore vegetation is found, a 2081 permit is not required. c. If in-shore vegetation is found within the limits of in-water work, CDFW will be contacted and a 2081 incidental permit will be obtained. All permit conditions will be implemented. 33. Prior to the project construction a drainage improvement plan shall be prepared by a qualified professional (Registered Civil Engineer) that demonstrates that drainage will be accommodated both on and off the site that will not result in adverse drainage impacts. The plan shall include all drainage facilities, both on-site and off-site, that will be installed as part of the project. The drainage plan must be designed and constructed in accordance with the Lake County Clean Water Program Storm Water Management Plan. Drainage facilities shall meet the City’s Design and Construction Standards. Drainage facilities shall be completed in accordance with the approved drainage plan. 37. A Grading Plan and Erosion and Sedimentation Control Plan prepared by a qualified professional (Registered Civil Engineer) shall be prepared for the project. This plan shall indicate both temporary and permanent erosion control measures to be implemented in accordance with standard Best Management Practices (BMP). Also, depending on whether or not required by the Regional Water Quality Control Board, a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan may also be necessary. Prior to the commencement of any grading activity on-site, structural control measures shall be installed to reduce erosion and retain sedimentation. Measures may include, but are not limited to, stabilization of control entrance, temporary gravel and construction entrance, installation of a temporary gravel construction entrance, and installation of filter fabric fences. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the Lake County Clean Water Program Storm Water Management Plan. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan, may also be required by the City Engineer. Erosion and sedimentation control shall be installed in accordance with the approved plan prior to project construction. City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 2 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 Based on this assessment, the draft Initial Study does not need to be amended or recirculated and has been determined to adequately address quality of surface and groundwaters of the state. No further changes are necessary to the draft Initial Study other than this response to comments. Therefore, this document is formalized as the Final Initial Study and the final decision making body on this project may issue a mitigated negative declaration. City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 3 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 4 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 5 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 6 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 7 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 8 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 9 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 10 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 11 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 12 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM A. Project Description and Background Summary Project title: Austin Park Master Plan Lead agency’s name and address: City of Clearlake, 14050 Olympic Drive, Clearlake, CA, 95422 Contact person’s name and phone Julie Burrow, Assistant Planner, (707) 994-8201 number: Project location: 14077 Lakeshore Drive in the City of Clearlake, CA. Lakeshore Drive runs from CA-53 down to the coast of Clear Lake, then along the coast line for approximately 8.5 miles. The 20-acre site includes a beach along the eastern shore of Clear Lake and is at the center of downtown, next to City Hall, a few restaurants and retail shops, single-family homes and Burns Valley Elementary School. (Refer to Maps 1 through 3) Project sponsor’s name, address and City of Clearlake, 14050 Olympic Drive, Clearlake, CA phone number: 95422 (707) 994-8201 Ext. 102, [email protected] General plan description: Open Space Zoning: O-Parks and Recreation District Description of project: The City of Clearlake is developing a comprehensive Master Plan for improvements to the existing Austin Park, a 20-acre park which is owned and maintained by the City of Clearlake. Austin Park is an important recreational center for local residents and surrounding communities, with large open spaces that host popular annual events. Existing park amenities include the beach, playgrounds, walking trails along with basketball, tennis and volleyball courts. The project includes a City-owned 2-acre parcel on the Lake, north of Austin Park beach. Most of this parcel is native grasses and mature City of Clearlake Environmental Initial Study-Final 13 Austin Park Master Plan Nov. 2017 trees, with a foot path following the edge of the lake. This parcel is not currently used for park programs; however, the future use of the property is included in the Master Plan. The Austin Park Master Plan proposes enhancement of existing areas that need improvements and open space areas that are underutilized and present an opportunity for new amenities. The Master Plan includes several improvements including a band shell stage focused on a multi-use turf event area, shade structure group picnic areas, perimeter path with Parcourse exercise equipment, Lakeshore Drive street improvements (including boardwalk style plaza and overlooks to the Lake) new playgrounds, dog park, in-ground concrete skate park, and several other amenities. A more detailed project description is provided in Section D of this document. Surrounding land uses and setting – The project site is a 20-acre, City owned property Briefly describe the project’s containing Austin Park, which includes a beach along surroundings: the eastern shore of Clear lake. The park is located at the center of downtown, next to City Hall, a few restaurants and retail shops, single-family homes and Burns Valley Elementary School. The School property includes two softball fields and a gated parking lot that are next to Austin Park, on its east side, across Uhl Avenue. The City also owns a 2-acre parcel on the Lake, north of the Austin Park beach. Most of the property is native grasses and intermittent mature trees. A foot path follows the edge of the lake that continues onto an adjacent, similar 5-acre private property parcel. The core of Austin park is where the park meets Lakeshore Drive and the boardwalk area of the Lake.
Recommended publications
  • 0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx

    0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx

    Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Initial Study / Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration August 12, 2020 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Prepared for: Napa Valley Community College District 2277 Napa-Vallejo Highway Napa, CA 94558 Prepared by: GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150 Santa Rosa, California 95407 August 12, 2020 Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND Table of Contents Project Information ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction and CEQA Requirements ........................................................................... 1-1 CEQA Lead Agency Contact Information ....................................................................... 1-1 Project Background and Objectives ............................................................................... 1-1 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-2 Environmental Protection Actions Incorporated Into the Proposed Project ................... 1-9 Required Agency Approvals ......................................................................................... 1-12 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 1-12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ..............................................................................
  • Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax

    Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax

    YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX PNW135 PNW135 | Page 1 YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX By Dale K. Whaley, Assistant Professor, Ag and Natural Resources, Washington State University Extension. Gary L. Piper, Emeritus Professor, Department of Entomology, Washington State University Abstract Yellow toadflax and Dalmatian toadflax are non-native plants that have become two of the most troublesome invasive weeds in North America. Infesting forests, range and grasslands, and other areas, these two weeds are very prevalent in the Pacific Northwest. This publication outlines the plants’ characteristics, variations, growth and reproduction, distribution and economic impact, as well as management strategies. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Identification 4 Variation 4 Growth and Reproduction 5 Distribution and Economic Impact 6 Management Strategies 7 Prevention, Early Detection, and Rapid Response 7 Cultural Control 8 Livestock Grazing for Control 8 Physical and Mechanical Control 9 Chemical Control 9 Biological Control 9 Maintenance 15 References 15 PNW135 | Page 2 PNW PUBLICATION | YELLOW AND DALMATIAN TOADFLAX Yellow and Dalmatian Toadflax Introduction Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. (Figure 1), and yellow toadflax, Linaria vulgaris Mill. (Figure 2), commonly referred to as “butter and eggs,” are two non-native plants that were introduced into North America as ornamentals from the Mediterranean region. Introduced by the 1800s, these two non-native plants have since escaped flower beds and have become two of the most troublesome invasive weeds infesting millions of acres across much of temperate North America. In the Pacific Northwest (defined here as Washington, Oregon, and Idaho) these plants can be found infesting forests, range and grassland, rights of way, lands put into conservation programs like the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP), and other disturbed areas (Sing et al.
  • Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District and Associated CEQA Findings

    Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District and Associated CEQA Findings

    1030 Seminary Street, Suite B Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Napa, California 94559 Subdivision of the State of California Phone: (707) 259-8645 www.napa.lafco.ca.gov We Manage Local Government Boundaries, Evaluate Municipal Services, and Protect Agriculture Agenda Item 9a (Action) TO: Local Agency Formation Commission PREPARED BY: Brendon Freeman, Executive Officer Dawn Mittleman Longoria, Analyst II MEETING DATE: February 1, 2021 SUBJECT: Proposed Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District and Associated CEQA Findings RECOMMENDATION Adopt the Resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission of Napa County Making Determinations – Magnolia Drive/State Highway 221 Annexation to the Napa Sanitation District (NSD) approving the proposed annexation with standard conditions and making California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings (Attachment One). BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY Applicant: Napa Valley College Tax Sharing Agreement: Yes – master (landowner petition) tax exchange agreement Proposed Action: Annexation to NSD Landowner Consent: 100% APN: 046-450-054 Protest Proceedings: Waived Area Size: 23.1 acres CEQA: Napa Valley College Student Address: 100 Magnolia Drive Housing Project Initial Study, Mitigated Jurisdiction: City of Napa Negative Declaration, & Mitigation Sphere of Influence Consistency: Yes Monitoring & Reporting Program Policy Consistency: Yes Current Land Uses: Undeveloped The purpose of the proposal is to facilitate the planned development of the affected territory consistent with the Napa Valley College Student Housing Project. The project will be located to the north of the Napa Valley College’s existing Performing Arts Center. The project involves a mix of apartments and traditional dorm-style units, study rooms and social gathering spaces, a new vehicle connection and parking lot, new pedestrian connections, and new wastewater and storm water infrastructure.
  • Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of The

    Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of The

    Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of the Clear Creek Management Area, Joaquin Ridge, Monocline Ridge, and Environs in San Benito and Western Fresno Counties, California Prepared By California Native Plant Society And California Department of Fish and Game Final Report Project funded by Funding Source: Resource Assessment Program California Department of Fish and Game And Funding Source: Resources Legacy Fund Foundation Grant Project Name: Central Coast Mapping Grant #: 2004-0173 February 2006 Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of the Clear Creek Management Area, Joaquin Ridge, Monocline Ridge, and Environs in San Benito and Western Fresno Counties, California Final Report February 2006 Principal Investigators: California Native Plant Society staff: Julie Evens, Senior Vegetation Ecologist Anne Klein, Vegetation Ecologist Jeanne Taylor, Vegetation Assistant California Department of Fish and Game staff: Todd Keeler-Wolf, Ph.D., Senior Vegetation Ecologist Diana Hickson, Senior Biologist (Botany) Addresses: California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 California Department of Fish and Game Biogeographic Data Branch 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95814 Reviewers: Bureau of Land Management: Julie Anne Delgado, Botanist California State University: John Sawyer, Professor Emeritus TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND...........................................................................................................................................
  • The Biological Resources Section Provides Background Information

    The Biological Resources Section Provides Background Information

    4.5 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Biological resources section provides background information on sensitive biological resources within Napa County, the regulations and programs that provide for their protection, and an assessment of the potential impacts to biological resources of implementing the Napa County General Plan Update. This section is based upon information presented in the Biological Resources Chapter of the Napa County Baseline Data Report (Napa County, BDR 2005). Additional information on the topics presented herein can be found in these documents. Both documents are incorporated into this section by reference. This section addresses biological resources other than fisheries which are separately addressed in Section 4.6. 4.5.1 SETTING REGIONAL SETTING The Napa County is located in the Coast Ranges Geomorphic Province. This province is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean and on the east by the Great Valley geomorphic province. A dominant characteristic of the Coast Ranges Province is the general northwest- southeast orientation of its valleys and ridgelines. In Napa County, located in the eastern, central section of the province, this trend consists of a series of long, linear, major and lesser valleys, separated by steep, rugged ridge and hill systems of moderate relief that have been deeply incised by their drainage systems. The County is located within the California Floristic Province, the portion of the state west of the Sierra Crest that is known to be particularly rich in endemic plant species (Hickman 1993, Stein et al. 2000). LOCAL SETTING The County’s highest topographic feature is Mount St. Helena, which is located in the northwest corner of the County and whose peak elevation is 4,343 feet.
  • Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California

    Vascular Plants of Santa Cruz County, California

    ANNOTATED CHECKLIST of the VASCULAR PLANTS of SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, CALIFORNIA SECOND EDITION Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland & Maps by Ben Pease CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY, SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CHAPTER Copyright © 2013 by Dylan Neubauer All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced without written permission from the author. Design & Production by Dylan Neubauer Artwork by Tim Hyland Maps by Ben Pease, Pease Press Cartography (peasepress.com) Cover photos (Eschscholzia californica & Big Willow Gulch, Swanton) by Dylan Neubauer California Native Plant Society Santa Cruz County Chapter P.O. Box 1622 Santa Cruz, CA 95061 To order, please go to www.cruzcps.org For other correspondence, write to Dylan Neubauer [email protected] ISBN: 978-0-615-85493-9 Printed on recycled paper by Community Printers, Santa Cruz, CA For Tim Forsell, who appreciates the tiny ones ... Nobody sees a flower, really— it is so small— we haven’t time, and to see takes time, like to have a friend takes time. —GEORGIA O’KEEFFE CONTENTS ~ u Acknowledgments / 1 u Santa Cruz County Map / 2–3 u Introduction / 4 u Checklist Conventions / 8 u Floristic Regions Map / 12 u Checklist Format, Checklist Symbols, & Region Codes / 13 u Checklist Lycophytes / 14 Ferns / 14 Gymnosperms / 15 Nymphaeales / 16 Magnoliids / 16 Ceratophyllales / 16 Eudicots / 16 Monocots / 61 u Appendices 1. Listed Taxa / 76 2. Endemic Taxa / 78 3. Taxa Extirpated in County / 79 4. Taxa Not Currently Recognized / 80 5. Undescribed Taxa / 82 6. Most Invasive Non-native Taxa / 83 7. Rejected Taxa / 84 8. Notes / 86 u References / 152 u Index to Families & Genera / 154 u Floristic Regions Map with USGS Quad Overlay / 166 “True science teaches, above all, to doubt and be ignorant.” —MIGUEL DE UNAMUNO 1 ~ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ~ ANY THANKS TO THE GENEROUS DONORS without whom this publication would not M have been possible—and to the numerous individuals, organizations, insti- tutions, and agencies that so willingly gave of their time and expertise.
  • California Lilac Ceanothus Divergens Rating: 0.0 ( 0 Votes)

    California Lilac Ceanothus Divergens Rating: 0.0 ( 0 Votes)

    California lilac Ceanothus divergens Rating: 0.0 ( 0 votes) This description is for California lilac (Ceanothus divergens): The distinctly toothed, oval-shaped leaves of ceanothus divergens, which is commonly known as calistoga ceanothus are a very eye-catching feature in and of themselves, while also serving as a pretty backdrop to this shrub’s striking blue or purple flowers that are produced in dense clusters. Calistoga ceanothus appreciates a well-drained loamy or sandy soil and is best grown in an area that receives full sunlight, though it will grow in partial shade too. This shrub is fantastic for incredible-looking groundcover and also looks delightful at the edge of a woodland garden. Find California lilac in our Shop! Free shipping from € 50! Plant Environment Usage Known dangers? Acidity Standard category no Neutral Trees & shrubs Alkaline Shrubs Height [m] Hardiness zone Grown for 1 Z8-10 Attractive Flowers Spread [m] Heat zone Creative category 1.5 H10-8 Kid Approved For Beginners Colours For every season Dominant flower colour Winter temperatures [°C] Garden type Blue -12 - 4 Cottage garden Coastal City Mediterranean garden Gravel garden Plant Environment Usage Flower Fragrance Heat days Garden spaces No, neutral please 90 - 180 Walls, trellises and pergolas Borders Flowering seasons Moisture Gardening expertise Early spring well-drained beginner Mid spring well-drained but frequently watered Late spring Foliage in spring Soil type Time to reach full size Green sandy up to 10 years chalky loams Foliage in summer Sun requirements Green Full sun Foliage in Autumn Exposure Green Sheltered Foliage in winter Green Propagation methods semi-ripe cuttings seed Growth habit Spreading .
  • Biological Investigation Report

    Biological Investigation Report

    Biological Investigation Report: Humboldt County APN 505-121-031 Survey Dates: March 18 and March 21, 2019 Prepared for Open Door Community Health Centers Arcata, Ca 95521 Contact: Project Manager Laura Kadlecik Tel: (707) 826-8633 x 5165 Prepared by Claire Brown March 28, 2019 Natural Resources Management Corporation 1434 Third Street, Eureka, CA 95501 (707) 442-1735 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Background: Historic Land Use ..................................................................................................................... 3 Wildlife .......................................................................................................................................................... 3 Pre-field Review ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Field Survey ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Survey Results ........................................................................................................................................... 5 Vegetation and Sensitive Plant Species ........................................................................................................ 5 Pre-field Review .......................................................................................................................................
  • Voucher Specimens at the UCD Center for Plant Diversity Unless Otherwise'indicated. Specimen Or Observation Data, If Known, Listed in Column on the Right

    Voucher Specimens at the UCD Center for Plant Diversity Unless Otherwise'indicated. Specimen Or Observation Data, If Known, Listed in Column on the Right

    VASCULAR PLANT SPECIES OF THE GREATER KNOXVILLE AREA Including the drainages of Knoxville, Hunting, and Davis Creeks. Compiled and annotated by Joe Callizo. Updated by Ellen Dean, 2019. Scientific names mostly follow the Jepson Manual 2012. Voucher specimens at the UCD Center for Plant Diversity unless otherwise'indicated. Specimen or observation data, if known, listed in column on the right. KEY TO PLANT SPECIES LIST Serpentine communities SMC Serpentine Mixed chaparral SCC Serpentine cypress chaparral SG Serpentine grassland SRS Serpentine riparian/seeps Non-serpentine communities BOW Blue oak woodland MOW Mixed oak woodland RW Riparian woodland NSMC Nonserpentine mixed chaparral CC Chamise chaparral NSG Nonserpentine grassland VP Vernal pool Other RD Revegetated and/or disturbed areas * Exotic Species F More common after fire R/S Rare or sensitive taxon FERNS AND FERN ALLIES EQUISETACEAE Equisetum laevigatum RW Dean 1156, Koehler s.n. Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii RW Koehler s.n. PTERIDACEAE Adiantum jordani NSMC, SMC Kim 15 Aspidotis californica NSMC Dean 1073 Aspidotis densa SMC Dean 1053 Cheilanthes intertexta SMC Dean 1074, Dean 1075 Pellaea andromedifolia SMC Kim 6, Knox 6, Dean 1079 Pellaea mucronata SMC Dean 1072 Pentagramma triangularis SMC Voigt 10 POLYPODIACEAE Polypodium californicum SMC Voigt 18, A. Laffin 7, 21 CONIFERS/GYMNOSPERMS CUPRESSACEAE Hesperocyparis macnabiana/ Cupressus SMC, SCC Houser 19, Waggoner 14, Blenkush 1 macnabiana Hesperocyparis sargentii/ Cupressus sargentii SMC, SRS, SCC Dean 1173, Sanchez-Mata s.n. Juniperus californica SMC, MOW Dean 1090 PINACEAE Pinus attenuata MOW Dean 1068 Pinus ponderosa RW, MOW Grows near Davis Reservoir Pinus sabiniana BOW, NSMC, SMC Disney 6, Wenk 10, Blenkush 16, Olsted 26 TAXACEAE Torreya californica RW, MOW Dean 1089 FLOWERING PLANTS/ANGIOSPERMS NON-MONOCOTYLEDONS ADOXACEAE Sambucus nigra ssp.
  • Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development

    Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development

    Ukiah Western Hills Open Land Acquisition & Limited Development Agreement Draft Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration Attachments April 16, 2021 ATTACHMENT A Existing Site Photographs Existing access road Existing water tank site Existing "house site" on one of the proposed Development Parcels ATTACHMENT B Prepared For: Michelle Irace, Planning Manager Department of Community Development 300 Seminary Avenue, Ukiah, CA 95482 APNs: 001-040-83, 157- 070-01, 157-070-02, and 003-190-01 Prepared by Jacobszoon & Associates, Inc. Alicia Ives Ringstad Senior Wildlife Biologist [email protected] Date: March 11, 2021 Updated: April 8, 2021 Biological Assessment Report Table of Contents Section 1.0: Introduction .................................................................................................................................................................. 2 Section 2.0: Regulations and Descriptions ....................................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................................................................. 2 2.2 Natural Communities and Sensitive Natural Communities .................................................................................................... 3 2.3 Special-Status Species...........................................................................................................................................................
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California

    A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California

    Humboldt State University Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University Botanical Studies Open Educational Resources and Data 3-2020 A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California James P. Smith Jr Humboldt State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Smith, James P. Jr, "A Checklist of Vascular Plants Endemic to California" (2020). Botanical Studies. 42. https://digitalcommons.humboldt.edu/botany_jps/42 This Flora of California is brought to you for free and open access by the Open Educational Resources and Data at Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Botanical Studies by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Humboldt State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A LIST OF THE VASCULAR PLANTS ENDEMIC TO CALIFORNIA Compiled By James P. Smith, Jr. Professor Emeritus of Botany Department of Biological Sciences Humboldt State University Arcata, California 13 February 2020 CONTENTS Willis Jepson (1923-1925) recognized that the assemblage of plants that characterized our flora excludes the desert province of southwest California Introduction. 1 and extends beyond its political boundaries to include An Overview. 2 southwestern Oregon, a small portion of western Endemic Genera . 2 Nevada, and the northern portion of Baja California, Almost Endemic Genera . 3 Mexico. This expanded region became known as the California Floristic Province (CFP). Keep in mind that List of Endemic Plants . 4 not all plants endemic to California lie within the CFP Plants Endemic to a Single County or Island 24 and others that are endemic to the CFP are not County and Channel Island Abbreviations .
  • Megachilidae) in Northwest California

    Megachilidae) in Northwest California

    HOST-PLANT SPECIALIZATION AND NESTING BIOLOGY OF ANTHIDIUM PLACITUM (MEGACHILIDAE) IN NORTHWEST CALIFORNIA By Christopher James Pow A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of Humboldt State University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in Biology Committee Membership Dr. Michael R. Mesler, Committee Chair Dr. Victor H. Gonzalez, Committee Member Dr. Erik S. Jules, Committee Member Dr. John O. Reiss, Committee Member Dr. Erik S. Jules, Program Graduate Coordinator May 2019 ABSTRACT HOST-PLANT SPECIALIZATION AND NESTING BIOLOGY OF ANTHIDIUM PLACITUM (MEGACHILIDAE) IN NORTHWEST CALIFORNIA Christopher James Pow • Premise of the study: Although the study of bees and their pollination services has grown immensely in recent years, the natural history of most solitary bee species is still largely unknown. The goal of this study was to contribute to the natural history dossier of a late-season wool carder bee, Anthidium placitum Cresson (Megachilidae), by establishing which plants it uses as sources of nectar and pollen as well as documenting details of its flower-handling behavior, mating behavior, and nesting biology in northwestern California. • Methods: Field observations were made at five sites in Del Norte, Humboldt, Siskiyou, and Trinity counties in California, USA. Pollen use was determined via microscopic examination of samples taken from 244 foraging females and 13 larval provisions. Naturally occurring nests were difficult to find, so I deployed aerial trap nests and created clusters of artificial soil cavities in an effort to obtain nest cells and determine preferred nesting substrate. Light microscopy and SEM were used to identify nest cell trichomes and to check females for specialized clypeal and basitarsal hairs.