DOCSLIB.ORG

2. Business Activities 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

2. Business Activities 1. Company Overview 3. Business Activities 4. Business Activities 5. Data 6. Other (Transportation Segment) (Real Estate and Hotels Segment) (The Other Segment) Izumo Fukuoka – Izumo Transportation Segment — Overview Bus Services Izumo Dream Hakata 100 million yen 100 million yen 2,000 1,763 1,787 1,798 400 1,670 1,688 1,706 1,704 1,716 1,766 1,379 1,403 1,500 292 274 274 300 257 Sanyo Main Line 1,000 200 Chikuho Main Line Shimonoseki Fukuyama Wakamatsu Sasaguri Line Fukuma Nogata Hiroshima Fukuoka – Hiroshima 500 100 Mojiko Fukuoka – Hiroshima/Fukuyama Kashii Line Kokura Moji Nogata Yamaguchi Kofuku Liner 2010/3 2011/3 2012/3 2013/3 2014/3 2015/3 2016/3 Jono Keisen 0 0 Saitozaki Hakata Shin-Iizuka 2017/3 2018/3 2019/3 2019/3 Shin-Iizuka Gotoji Line Reclassified in Meinohama Yoshizuka accordance with (100) Chikuhi Line Umi (99) (105) new segment Hakata (105) (114) (110) Haruda Tagawa-Gotoji Fukuoka – Yamaguchi (132) ( categories ) Nishi-Karatsu Soeda (149) Fukuoka Yamaguchi Liner Shin-Tosu Tosu Hitahikosan Line (200) Fukuoka Operating revenues (from external customers) (left) Operating income (right) Karatsu Line Imari Note: Figures from FY2010/3 to FY2019/3 show results under the former segment classification. (See page 15.) Kubota Fukuoka – Kagoshima Miyazaki – Oita Kurume Yoake Kyudai Main Line Oita Sakurajima Sasebo Sasebo Line Pacific Liner Saga Chikugo-Funagoya Beppu Hizen- Ureshino Haiki Takeo Oita Number of Services by Route Yamaguchi Ushinodake Fukuoka – Miyazaki Shin-Omuta Service suspended due to Ureshino (as of April 1, 2019) Phoenix Nagasaki Main Line natural disasters Railway Services Omura Line Shin- Sonogi No. of services Tamana Route name Aso Houhi Main Line (restated) Kagoshima Main Line Total JR Kyushu Bus Higo-Ozu Route Summary Isahaya Kumamoto Nogata 180 180 Nagasaki Uto Ureshino 63 63 (as of March 31, 2019) Misumi Shin-Yatsushiro Hokusatsu 55 55 *1 Shin-Yatsushiro Local bus Misumi Line – Miyazaki Subtotal 298 298 B&S Miyazaki Fukuoka – Miyazaki 56 8 Number of train lines Operating Kilometers No. of Stations Electrification Ratio(%) Shin-Yatsushiro Yatsushiro Fukuoka – Kagoshima (daytime) 40 4 Fukuoka – Kagoshima (overnight) 2 1 Shinkansen 1 288.9 4(11) 100 Nippo Main Line Miyazaki 10 6 Miyanojo Fukuoka – Yamaguchi Shin-Minamata Hisatsu Line Fukuoka – Hiroshima (daytime) 18 6 Ichikikushikino Trunk Lines 8 1,042.9 297 95 Kyushu Shinkansen Fukuoka – Hiroshima/Fukuyama (overnight) 2 1 Izumi Kitto Line Kagoshima Fukuoka – Izumo (overnight) 2 1 Yoshimatsu Hokusatsu Expressway bus Shin-Yatsushiro – Miyazaki 32 16 Local Lines 13 941.2 267 7 Kagoshima-Chuo Miyazaki Miyazaki Airport Line Miyazaki – Oita 12 2 Minami-Miyazaki Subtotal 174 45 Total 22 2,273.0 568 59 Sendai Kagoshima Total 472 343 Hayato Miyazaki Airport Tayoshi *1: including scheduled sightseeing buses Notes: Number of stations in parentheses represent the number of stations including Sakurajima- Miyakonojo Sakurajima Port stations served by both Shinkansen and conventional lines. Kyushu Shinkansen Kagoshima Sanbashi Kagoshima-Chuo Nichinan Line Sanyo Shinkansen Kagoshima-Chuo Trunk Lines Ibusuki Makurazaki Line Shibushi Local Lines Makurazaki Revenues from Railway Transportation and Fukuoka City Subway Operating Income in the Railway Business Hydrofoil Ferry Services 100 million yen 100 million yen Fukuoka – Busan:213 km Port terminal 1,800 300 Busan 1,511 1,514 <Seaway> Hydrofoil ferry Fukuoka: Hakata Port International 1,439 1,450 1,501 1,464 1,416 1,412 BEETLE (191 seats): Terminal 1,304 1,252 1,202 1,198 1,197 1,221 1,222 1,189 1,204 1,201 1,203 1,215 1,209 1,168 3 hr 5 min travel, 1,108 1,108 1,124 1,152 1,175 1,142 1,114 1,119 1,144 250 282 267 Tsushima: Hidakatsu Port 1,200 1,069 200 2–3 round trips/day International Terminal Busan: Busan Port International Tsushima 600 Passenger Terminal 100 (Hidakatsu) 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 No. of services /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 0 0 Fukuoka – Busan: 2–3 round trips/day (7) 2017 2018 2019 /3 /3 /3 Tsushima (Hidakatsu) – Busan:76 km (40) (39) Tsushima – Busan: 2 round trips/day (57) (53) <Seaway> Hydrofoil ferry (82) (89) (100) BEETLE (191 seats): (109) (104) (122) (117) (115) 1 hr 10 min travel, (140) (136) (139) (140) Fukuoka (145) 2 round trips/day (168) (156) (Hakata) (183) (173) (203) (200) (208) (205) (207) (214) (232) (280) (276) (300) 4 Railway transportation revenues (left) Operating income (right) 2. Business Activities 1. Company Overview 3. Business Activities 4. Business Activities 5. Data 6. Other (Transportation Segment) (Real Estate and Hotels Segment) (The Other Segment) Current Status of Railway Business Transportation Data Railway Transportation Revenues Passenger-kilometers Million passenger-km 100 millon yen 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 Passes 58 66 157 176 186 188 194 196 195 199 Passes 7 8 20 23 24 25 26 26 26 27 Other 325 423 1,666 1,605 1,639 1,674 1,735 1,655 1,809 1,832 Other 94 123 477 459 464 467 490 474 514 522 Shinkansen Subtotal 384 489 1,823 1,782 1,825 1,863 1,929 1,852 2,004 2,032 Shinkansen Subtotal 102 131 498 482 489 493 516 501 541 549 Passes 3,820 3,870 3,915 3,943 4,069 3,946 4,026 4,018 4,011 4,015 Passes 284 286 288 291 296 293 295 294 296 297 Other 3,698 3,714 3,149 3,198 3,287 3,329 3,421 3,320 3,319 3,237 Lines Other 758 750 630 637 654 663 688 668 673 668 Conventional Subtotal 7,518 7,585 7,064 7,141 7,357 7,275 7,448 7,339 7,331 7,252 Lines Conventional Subtotal 1,042 1,037 918 929 950 957 984 963 970 965 Passes 3,879 3,936 4,073 4,119 4,256 4,134 4,221 4,214 4,207 4,214 Passes 291 294 309 314 320 319 322 321 323 324 Other 4,023 4,137 4,815 4,804 4,926 5,003 5,156 4,976 5,129 5,070 Total Subtotal 7,902 8,074 8,888 8,924 9,182 9,138 9,378 Other 852 874 1,107 1,097 1,118 1,131 1,179 1,143 1,188 1,190 9,191 9,336 9,285 Total Subtotal 1,144 1,168 1,416 1,412 1,439 1,450 1,501 1,464 1,511 1,514 Number of Passengers Index (FY1988/3=100) 107 109 132 132 135 136 140 137 141 142 Million 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 Railway Transportation Revenues(Short Distance*) Railway Transportation Revenues (Shinkansen), Passenger Load Factor Passes 193 196 201 203 211 206 212 213 215 217 Other 99 101 108 110 112 113 118 118 121 121 * Within 50 km Total on the Kyushu Shinkansen (Hakata－Kumamoto) Subtotal 292 297 310 314 323 319 330 331 337 338 100 millon yen 100 millon yen % Passes 0 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 300 600 60 541 549 Other 2 3 9 9 10 10 10 10 11 11 248 249 258 259 493 516 501 236 500 52 55 Shinkansen Subtotal 50 3 4 11 12 12 12 13 13 14 14 49 48 200 400 47 50 Note: Numbers of Shinkansen passengers have been restated. 300 45 100 200 40 Train-kilometers, Car-kilometers Million-km 100 35 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 0 0 30 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 /3 2015/3 2016/3 2017/3 2018/3 2019/3 2015/3 2016/3 2017/3 2018/3 2019/3 Train-kilometers Railway transportation revenues (Shinkansen) (left) Shinkansen 3 3 9 10 10 10 10 9 9 9 Passenger load factor on the Kyushu Shinkansen (Hakata-Kumamoto) (right) Number of Rolling Stocks Conventional Lines 66 65 61 61 61 61 61 60 60 56 Total 69 69 71 71 72 71 71 69 69 65 Number of Rolling Stocks by Type(as of March 31, 2019) Car-kilometers cars Shinkansen 19 23 68 72 72 71 71 64 70 68 SL EL DL TEC EC DC PC Type Steam locomotive Electric locomotive Internal combustion locomotive Shinkansen Electric railcars Internal combustion railcars Passenger cars Other Total Conventional Lines 273 271 248 248 250 250 250 247 243 230 No. of車 rolling 両 stocks 1 0 9 136 1,178 304 10 31 1,669 Total 292 295 317 320 322 322 322 311 314 299 Rolling Stock Fiscal Year of Manufacture (as of March 31, 2019) Shinkansen 800 Series Shinkansen N700 Series ■Internal combustion locomotive ■Shinkansen ■Electric railcars ■Internal combustion railcars ■Passenger cars Fiscal year of manufacture: FY2004/3 to FY2011/3 Fiscal year of manufacture: FY2011/3 to FY2013/3 Conventional lines (electric railcars) 415 Series Cars Fiscal year of manufacture: FY1979/3 to FY1987/3 150 100 Conventional lines (internal combustion railcars) Conventional lines (electric railcars) Conventional lines (internal combustion railcars) KiHa66/KiHa67 821 Series YC1 Series Fiscal year of manufacture: FY1975/3 50 Fiscal year of manufacture: FY2018/3 and thereafter Fiscal year of manufacture: FY2019/3 and thereafter 0 1 9 71 3/ 9 3 71 4 9/ 3 71 5/ 9 3 71 6/ 9 3 71 7 9/ 3 71 8/ 9 3 71 9/ 9 3 81 0/ 9 3 81 9/ 3 81 2 9/ 3 81 3/ 9 3 81 4 9/ 3 81 5/ 9 3 81 6/ 9 3 81 7 9/ 3 81 8/ 9 3 81 9/ 9 3 91 0/ 9 3 91 9/ 3 91 2 9/ 3 91 3/ 9 3 91 4 9/ 3 91 5/ 9 3 91 6/ 9 3 91 7 9/ 3 91 8/ 9 3 92 9/ 0 3 02 0/ 0 3 02 1 0/ 3 02 0/ 3 02 3/ 0 3 02 4 0/ 3 02 5/ 0 3 02 6/ 0 3 02 7 0/ 3 02 8/ 0 3 02 9/ 0 3 12 0/ 0 3 12 1 0/ 3 12 0/ 3 12 3/ 0 3 12 4 0/ 3 12 5/ 0 3 12 6/ 0 3 12 7 0/ 3 12 8/ 0 3 1 9/ 3 FY 5 Note: Excluding steam locomotives and other rolling stock 2.
Recommended publications
  • The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil

    The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil

    The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil Christopher D. Barry, Bryan Duffty Planing @brid hydrofoils or partially hydrofoil supported planing boat are hydrofoils that intentionally operate in what would be the takeoff condition for a norma[ hydrofoil. They ofler a compromise ofperformance and cost that might be appropriate for ferq missions. The stepped hybrid configuration has made appearances in the high speed boat scene as early as 1938. It is a solution to the problems of instability and inefficiency that has limited other type of hybrids. It can be configured to have good seakeeping as well, but the concept has not been used as widely as would be justified by its merits. The purpose of this paper is to reintroduce this concept to the marine community, particularly for small, fast ferries. We have performed analytic studies, simple model experiments and manned experiments, andfiom them have determined some specljic problems and issues for the practical implementation of this concept. This paper presents background information, discusses key concepts including resistance, stability, seakeeping, and propulsion and suggests solutions to what we believe are the problems that have limited the widespread acceptance of this concept. Finally we propose a “strawman” design for a ferry in a particular service using this technology. BACKGROUND Partially hydrofoil supported planing hulls mix hydrofoil support and planing lift. The most obvious A hybrid hydrofoil is a vehicle combining the version of this concept is a planing hull with a dynamic lift of hydrofoils with a significant amount of hydrofoil more or less under the center of gravity. lit? tiom some other source, generally either buoyancy Karafiath (1974) studied this concept and ran model or planing lift.
  • Austal Awarded A$68M Contract for 83 Metre Trimaran by Jr Kyushu Jet Ferry of Japan

    Austal Awarded A$68M Contract for 83 Metre Trimaran by Jr Kyushu Jet Ferry of Japan

    COMPANY ANNOUNCEMENT 5 MARCH 2018 AUSTAL AWARDED A$68M CONTRACT FOR 83 METRE TRIMARAN BY JR KYUSHU JET FERRY OF JAPAN Following the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) announced 8 December 2017, Austal (ASX:ASB) is pleased to announce the award of a A$68 million contract to design and build an 83 metre trimaran ferry for JR Kyushu Jet Ferry of Japan. Australia’s Ambassador to Japan, The Hon Richard Court AC and Japan’s Consul-General in Perth, Western Australia, Mr Tatsuo Hirayama joined Austal’s Chairman Mr John Rothwell AO and Chief Executive Officer Mr David Singleton for a signing ceremony at the Australian shipyard with JR Kyushu Jet Ferry’s President, Mr Masayuki Mizuno and General Manager, Planning, Mr Hitoshi Ogawa. “Austal congratulates JR Kyushu Jet Ferry on the selection of our proven trimaran platform to expand their Japan to South Korea route. This exciting new vessel will deliver excellent seakeeping and an unparalleled customer experience to JR Kyushu’s ferry network,” Mr Singleton said. “This contract is an outstanding start to 2018 for Austal, following a record year for commercial vessel sales in 2017 - and reflects our continued focus as a technology-led organisation in developing industry- leading, customised solutions for commercial operators around the world. Mr Ben Marland, Vice President Sales and Marketing, added “Austal’s unique trimaran hull design has truly revolutionised the commercial and defence vessel markets. This is the first high-speed trimaran ferry we have placed in to Japan and we are delighted to be partnered with JR Kyushu Jet Ferry on this prestigious route.
  • Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization

    Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization

    Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization Andy Gunkler and Dr. C. Mark Archibald Grove City College Grove City, PA 16127 Email: [email protected] Abstract – Human powered hydrofoil watercraft can have marked performance advantages over displacement-hull craft, but pose significant engineering challenges. The focus of this hydrofoil independent research project was two-fold. First of all, a general vehicle configuration was developed. Secondly, a thorough optimization process was developed for designing lifting foils that are highly efficient over a wide range of speeds. Given a well-defined set of design specifications, such as vehicle weight and desired top speed, an optimal horizontal, non-surface- piercing wing can be engineered. Design variables include foil span, area, planform shape, and airfoil cross section. The optimization begins with analytical expressions of hydrodynamic characteristics such as lift, profile drag, induced drag, surface wave drag, and interference drag. Research of optimization processes developed in the past illuminated instances in which coefficients of lift and drag were assumed to be constant. These shortcuts, made presumably for the sake of simplicity, lead to grossly erroneous regions of calculated drag. The optimization process developed for this study more accurately computes profile drag forces by making use of a variable coefficient of drag which, was found to be a function of the characteristic Reynolds number, required coefficient of lift, and airfoil section. At the desired cruising speed, total drag is minimized while lift is maximized. Next, a strength and rigidity analysis of the foil eliminates designs for which the hydrodynamic parameters produce structurally unsound wings. Incorporating constraints on minimum takeoff speed and power required to stay foil-borne isolates a set of optimized design parameters.
  • FY20.3 Annual Investors Meeting

    FY20.3 Annual Investors Meeting

    FY20.3 Annual Investors Meeting May 12, 2020 Kyushu Railway Company Contents Highlights 3 Ⅰ Financial results for FY20.3 4 Ⅱ Forecasts for FY21.3 11 Ⅲ Short-term strategies 15 Ⅳ Status of Medium-Term Business Plan Initiatives 18 APPENDIX 28 2 Highlights Results Consolidated operating revenue, operating income, ordinary income, and net for FY20.3 income all declined. Due to the influence of the spread of the COVID 19 infection, future revenue trends Forecasts are very unclear, and accordingly our results forecast and annual dividends have not for FY21.3 yet been determined at this point. In the future, when it becomes possible to make a forecast, we will release it promptly. Cash flow is declining substantially, centered on the decline in railway passenger revenues. Accordingly, we will advance measures with the highest priority on securing liquidity at hand. In preparation for further worsening of cash flow, we will consider and implement Short-term diversification of our fund-raising methods. strategies Looking at capital investment, we will steadily advance railway safety investment and investment in two station buildings. On the other hand, we will delay or control investment as much as possible. When we generate cash through the reevaluation of our portfolio, we will first allocate it to working capital. Status of To further strengthen our management foundation, we will accelerate the reevaluation Medium-Term of our business portfolio. Business Plan We will work to build sustainable railway services through improved profitability, and will strive to increase the population in the areas around our railway lines by investing Initiatives in strategic city-building initiatives in the regions around our bases.
  • 2008 Fact Book

    2008 Fact Book

    2008 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK 59th Edition June 2008 PUBLISHED BY American Public Transportation Association American Public Transportation Association 1666 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 TELEPHONE: (202) 496-4800 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.apta.com APTA’s Vision Statement Be the leading force in advancing public transportation. APTA’s Mission Statement APTA serves and leads its diverse membership through advocacy, innovation, and information sharing to strengthen and expand public transportation. APTA’s Policy on Diversity APTA recognizes the importance of diversity for conference topics and speakers and is committed to increasing the awareness of its membership on diversity issues. APTA welcomes ideas and suggestions on how to strengthen its efforts to meet these important diversity objectives. Prepared by John Neff, Senior Policy Researcher [email protected] (202) 496-4812 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK American Public Transportation Association Washington, DC June 2008 Material from 2008 Public Transportation Fact Book may be quoted or reproduced without obtaining the permission of the American Public Transportation Association. Suggested Identification: American Public Transportation Association: Public Transportation Fact Book, Washington, DC, June, 2008. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 28. Fossil Fuel Consumption by Mode…………….. 31 29. Non-diesel Fossil Fuel Consumption by Fuel… 31 INTRODUCTION 30. Bus Power Sources…....................................... 31 31. Bus Fossil Fuel Consumption…………………... 32 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW…………… 7 32. Paratransit Fuel Consumption………………….. 32 33. Rail Vehicle Fuel and Power Consumption….… 32 NATIONAL SUMMARY………………………….....…… 15 SAFETY………………………...............………..........… 33 1. Number of Public Transportation Service Providers by Mode……………………………… 15 34. Fatality Rates by Mode of Travel, 2001-2003… 33 2.
  • Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore Is Located in Anacapri, the Highest and Most Peaceful Area of the Island of Capri

    Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore Is Located in Anacapri, the Highest and Most Peaceful Area of the Island of Capri

    How to get to Hotel Orsa Maggiore Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore is located in Anacapri, the highest and most peaceful area of the island of Capri. We provide a free shuttle service on arrival and departure , from the port to the hotel and vice versa. Navigational companies: Call us a couple of hours before you are scheduled to arrive on the island, letting us know which ferry or Roma Aliscafi SNAV +39 081 8377577 hydrofoil you are going to take: you’ll find our driver waiting for you at the port. ORSA MAGGIORE Caremar Spa +39 081 8370700 NLG Navigazione Libera del Golfo +39 081 8370819 Phone: +39 081 8373351 Port Authority +39 081 8370226 Capri’s port is a small one and it's not always possible to park vehicles near to the landing docks. When Tourist Information Offices the port is busy, we ask guests to wait for the driver next to the Funicular railway ticket office. +39 081 8370686 Our shuttle service is available from 09.00 until 20.30. Should you decide to arrive or leave early in the Napoli morning or late in the evening, you will need to take a taxi or the bus (Marina Grande-Anacapri). Sorrento Positano Capri Hydrofoils and ferries to Capri depart from Naples and Sorrento. How long will the journey take? In the summer months, sea crossings are also From Rome airport: minimum 3 hours available from Positano, Amalfi, Salerno and (traveling by fast train and without missing a the island of Ischia. single connection) Times of crossings are subject to variation and From Naples airport: 90mins it’s always a good idea to check the hydrofoil From Sorrento: 30mins and ferry schedule before you travel to the port.
  • Shinkansen - Wikipedia 7/3/20, 10�48 AM

    Shinkansen - Wikipedia 7/3/20, 1048 AM

    Shinkansen - Wikipedia 7/3/20, 10)48 AM Shinkansen The Shinkansen (Japanese: 新幹線, pronounced [ɕiŋkaꜜɰ̃ seɴ], lit. ''new trunk line''), colloquially known in English as the bullet train, is a network of high-speed railway lines in Japan. Initially, it was built to connect distant Japanese regions with Tokyo, the capital, in order to aid economic growth and development. Beyond long-distance travel, some sections around the largest metropolitan areas are used as a commuter rail network.[1][2] It is operated by five Japan Railways Group companies. A lineup of JR East Shinkansen trains in October Over the Shinkansen's 50-plus year history, carrying 2012 over 10 billion passengers, there has been not a single passenger fatality or injury due to train accidents.[3] Starting with the Tōkaidō Shinkansen (515.4 km, 320.3 mi) in 1964,[4] the network has expanded to currently consist of 2,764.6 km (1,717.8 mi) of lines with maximum speeds of 240–320 km/h (150– 200 mph), 283.5 km (176.2 mi) of Mini-Shinkansen lines with a maximum speed of 130 km/h (80 mph), and 10.3 km (6.4 mi) of spur lines with Shinkansen services.[5] The network presently links most major A lineup of JR West Shinkansen trains in October cities on the islands of Honshu and Kyushu, and 2008 Hakodate on northern island of Hokkaido, with an extension to Sapporo under construction and scheduled to commence in March 2031.[6] The maximum operating speed is 320 km/h (200 mph) (on a 387.5 km section of the Tōhoku Shinkansen).[7] Test runs have reached 443 km/h (275 mph) for conventional rail in 1996, and up to a world record 603 km/h (375 mph) for SCMaglev trains in April 2015.[8] The original Tōkaidō Shinkansen, connecting Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka, three of Japan's largest cities, is one of the world's busiest high-speed rail lines.
  • Planning and Operational Analyses for a New Intercity Transit Service

    Planning and Operational Analyses for a New Intercity Transit Service

    Planning and Operational Analyses for A New Intercity Transit Service Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Ranjbari, Andisheh Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 07:58:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630234 PLANNING AND OPERATIONAL ANALYSES FOR A NEW INTERCITY TRANSIT SERVICE By ANDISHEH RANJBARI ________________________ Copyright © Andisheh Ranjbari 2018 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2018 THE LTNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Commiuee, we certifu that we have read the dissertation prepared by Andisheh Ranjbari, titled Planning and Operation Analyses for A New Intercity Transit Service and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: May 3,2418 Date: May 3,2018 Mark D. Hickman Date: May 3,2018 Neng Fan Date: May 3,2018 Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certiff that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
  • 2017/02/08 Summary of Financial Results for the Third Quarter

    2017/02/08 Summary of Financial Results for the Third Quarter

    Consolidated Financial Results for the Nine-Month Period Ended December 31, 2016 (Japanese GAAP) February 8, 2017 Company name: Kyushu Railway Company Stock exchange listings: Tokyo and Fukuoka Securities code: 9142 URL: http://www.jrkyushu.co.jp/ Representative: Toshihiko Aoyagi, Representative Director and President Contact: Hisashi Yamane, General Manager, Public Relations Department Tel.: +81-092-474-2541 Scheduled date for filing of quarterly report: February 9, 2017 Scheduled date of dividend payment commencement: － Preparation of supplementary explanations for quarterly financial results: Yes Holding of a briefing on quarterly financial results: None (Amounts less than one million yen, except for per share amounts, are omitted.) 1. Consolidated Financial Results for the Nine Months Ended December 31, 2016 (From April 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016) (1) Consolidated operating results (Percentages show year-on-year changes.) Net income attributable Operating revenues Operating income Ordinary income to owners of the parent Nine months ended Millions of yen % Millions of yen % Millions of yen % Millions of yen % December 31, 263,628 － 46,252 － 47,683 － 33,819 － 2016 December 31, － － － － － － － － 2015 (Note) Comprehensive income: Nine months ended December 31, 2016: ¥32,841 million (－%). Nine months ended December 31, 2015: ¥－ (－%) Net income per share Net income per share — basic — diluted Nine months ended Yen Yen December 31, 211.37 － 2016 December 31, － － 2015 (Note) On August 18, 2016, the Company conducted a stock split at a ratio of 500 shares for each share of common stock. Calculations of quarterly income per share were made under the assumption that the stock split would occur at the beginning of this consolidated fiscal year.
  • Course Objectives Chapter 2 2. Hull Form and Geometry

    Course Objectives Chapter 2 2. Hull Form and Geometry

    COURSE OBJECTIVES CHAPTER 2 2. HULL FORM AND GEOMETRY 1. Be familiar with ship classifications 2. Explain the difference between aerostatic, hydrostatic, and hydrodynamic support 3. Be familiar with the following types of marine vehicles: displacement ships, catamarans, planing vessels, hydrofoil, hovercraft, SWATH, and submarines 4. Learn Archimedes’ Principle in qualitative and mathematical form 5. Calculate problems using Archimedes’ Principle 6. Read, interpret, and relate the Body Plan, Half-Breadth Plan, and Sheer Plan and identify the lines for each plan 7. Relate the information in a ship's lines plan to a Table of Offsets 8. Be familiar with the following hull form terminology: a. After Perpendicular (AP), Forward Perpendiculars (FP), and midships, b. Length Between Perpendiculars (LPP or LBP) and Length Overall (LOA) c. Keel (K), Depth (D), Draft (T), Mean Draft (Tm), Freeboard and Beam (B) d. Flare, Tumble home and Camber e. Centerline, Baseline and Offset 9. Define and compare the relationship between “centroid” and “center of mass” 10. State the significance and physical location of the center of buoyancy (B) and center of flotation (F); locate these points using LCB, VCB, TCB, TCF, and LCF st 11. Use Simpson’s 1 Rule to calculate the following (given a Table of Offsets): a. Waterplane Area (Awp or WPA) b. Sectional Area (Asect) c. Submerged Volume (∇S) d. Longitudinal Center of Flotation (LCF) 12. Read and use a ship's Curves of Form to find hydrostatic properties and be knowledgeable about each of the properties on the Curves of Form 13. Calculate trim given Taft and Tfwd and understand its physical meaning i 2.1 Introduction to Ships and Naval Engineering Ships are the single most expensive product a nation produces for defense, commerce, research, or nearly any other function.
  • Hilton Fukuoka Sea Hawk Your First Choice Destination Contents Contents

    Hilton Fukuoka Sea Hawk Your First Choice Destination Contents Contents

    HILTON FUKUOKA SEA HAWK YOUR FIRST CHOICE DESTINATION CONTENTS CONTENTS 1. Why Fukuoka ? 1. WHY FUKUOKA? 2. Why Hilton Fukuoka Sea Hawk 3. Meeting Rooms 2. WHY HILTON FUKUOKA SEA HAWK? 4. Catering to your every need 5. Dining options 3. MEETING ROOMS 6. Accommodation 4. CATERING TO YOUR EVERY NEED 7. Relaxation in your spare time 5. DINING OPTIONS 6. ACCOMMODATION 7. RELAXATION IN YOUR SPARE TIME TOUCH TO NEXT WHY FUKUOKA? 1. ACCESSIBILITY EASY ACCESS FROM OVERSEAS • Fukuoka is situated on the northern shore of the island of Kyushu in Japan. • Ranked 10th of the world’s most livable cities in the magazine Monocle in 2014, Fukuoka was praised for its green spaces in a metropolitan setting. • Direct flights to 20 major cities overseas. EASY ACCESS WITHIN JAPAN • Direct access from major cities in Asia • Hong Kong : 3hr 15min | Singapore : 5hr 55mins | Shanghai : 1hr 40mins • Seoul : 1hr 20mins | Seoul : 1hrs | Taipei : 2hrs EASY ACCESS WITHIN JAPAN To/from Tokyo • Number of flights departing from Fukuoka: 378 flights a day • Approximately 2hrs from Narita airport or from Haneda airport in Tokyo To/from Osaka (Kansai) • Over an hour from Kansai International Airport (KIX) and Itami domestic airport. 176 • Number of bullet trains departing from bullet Fukuoka: 176 trains a day trains a day • 2.5 hours to and from Osaka on bullet train. 378 flights a day OSAKA To/from hotel FUKUOKA TOKYO • 20 mins to the International and Domestic ● ● airport by car. Public transportation is also ● available. • 15 mins to the Hakata Station for the bullet KYOTO train access.
  • “JR-KYUSHU RAIL PASS (FUKUOKA WIDE)”! -We Are Starting Sales of a New Product That Allows You to Travel on Deals in the Fukuoka-Karatsu Area!

    “JR-KYUSHU RAIL PASS (FUKUOKA WIDE)”! -We Are Starting Sales of a New Product That Allows You to Travel on Deals in the Fukuoka-Karatsu Area!

    August 28th, 2018 Kyushu Railway Company We are starting sales of a new product aimed at foreign visitors to Japan, the “JR-KYUSHU RAIL PASS (FUKUOKA WIDE)”! -We are starting sales of a new product that allows you to travel on deals in the Fukuoka-Karatsu area!- The Kyushu Railway Company has been selling the free pass for railway travel, the “JR-KYUSHU RAIL PASS” aimed at foreign visitors to Japan to allow them to travel on deals, and until now many passengers have made use of this pass. This time we are starting sales of the new product, the “JR-KYUSHU RAIL PASS (FUKUOKA WIDE)” with the aim of promoting the further use of railways by passengers who are foreign visitors to Japan. This product allows passengers to travel easily to the main tourist areas within Fukuoka Prefecture, of course, as well as to the Karatsu area of Saga Prefecture, and to freely board and alight from Limited Express and Local trains using non-reserved seats. In addition, we have prepared privileges available at tourist facilities etc. in the area where the pass can be used. From now on we will strive to promote the use of railways so that even more foreign visitors to Japan can feel satisfied. 1 Name of the Ticket "JR-KYUSHU RAIL PASS (FUKUOKA WIDE)" 2 Sales Period (Sat.), September 1st, 2018 to (Sat.), August 31st, 2019 3 Period of Validity 2 consecutive days 4 Selling Price Adults (aged 12 years and over) 3,000 yen Children (aged between 6 and 11) 1,500 yen * For sales points, please see the attachment.