DOCSLIB.ORG

Important Message

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

WE INTERRUPT YOUR REGULARLY SCHEDULED PROGRAM FOR AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE Q1 2018 inside this Disrupted: edition... New Rules for a New Type of Customer By Angela Weber, CMO OrthoSynetics Page 34 BUSINESS PRACTICE & DEVELOPMENT TRAVEL & LEISURE CLINICAL CORNER 18 15 37 From the Rear View Mirror Pro Travel Tips High Frequency Vibration Can BY DR. COURTNEY DUNN BY PROORTHO STAFF Reduce or Eliminate Pain During Aligner Treatment 30 20 BY DR. JONATHAN L. NICOZISIS Traveling to the Greek Islands New Gaidge CEO BY DR. DANIELA LOEBL INTERVIEW WITH RYAN MOYNIHAN 32 OFFICE LOGISTICS 34 Traveling to Peru Disrupted: New Rules for a New BY DR. DAVID WALKER 56 Type of Customer Beyond Reminders: BY ANGELA WEBER, CMO ORTHOSYNETICS 40 Tapping the Potential of Texting Traveling to Spain BY DR. KEITH DRESSLER 44 BY DR. DAVID MAJERONI What Would You Do If an Aligner 46 Store Opened Down the Street? ORTHOPUNDIT.COM BY DR. JENNIFER EISENHUTH Traveling to Europe BY DR. BEN BURRIS & BRIDGET BURRIS 09 MARKETING/ H.R. INSIGHT Don't Piss Momma Off! SOCIAL MEDIA BY DR. BEN BURRIS 05 28 24 Go High or Go Low - Just Don't Get Utilize Group Interviews To Made to Measure: Stuck in the Middle Maximize Hiring Success The Dubious Relationship Between BY DR. LEON KLEMPNER AND AMY EPSTEIN, BY BRIDGET BURRIS Eugenics and Orthodontics MBA ANSWERS FROM THE BY DR. MARC ACKERMAN 52 EDGE 59 5 Keys to Capturing the Fastest The Economy Is Booming – Why Growing Referral Source 10 Isn’t Your Practice? BY NICK DUNCAN Interviews with Dr. Jeff Kozlowski BY DR. BEN BURRIS & Dr. Andrew Appel The ideas, views and opinions in each article are the opinion of the named author. They do not necessarily reflect the views Theof Progressive Orthodontist, its publisher, or editors. The Progressive Orthodontist® (“Publication”) DOES NOT provide any legal or accounting advice and the individuals reading this Publication should consult with their own lawyer for legal advice and accountant for accounting advice. The Publication is a general service that provides general information and may contain information of a legal or accounting nature. There is no guarantee or warranty regarding the information contained in the Publication and we are not responsible for any loss, injury, claim, liability, or damage (“damages”) related to your use of the information contained in the Publication or from errors or omissions in the content of the Publication. While we have worked to make our Publication and all the features in the Publication as helpful as possible, the Publication does not endorse any content provided by any feature, nor does it assume any responsibility for the interpretation or application of any information originating from such content. In addition, The Progressive Orthodontist does not endorse any content contained in any advertising on the Publication, nor does it assume any responsibility for the quality or integrity of such work. Content is property of The Progressive Orthodontist and may not be copied or otherwise duplicated without prior written consent from The Progressive Orthodontist. All content contributed to The Progressive Orthodontist magazine becomes the property of SmileMedia. The publisher assumes no responsibility for return of unsolicited manuscripts, art, photos or other content. EDITOR’S NOTE EXECUTIVE EDITOR Change is good as we have often perspective of patients. & TRAVEL AND said but few orthodontists seem The good news is that there is LEISURE EDITOR to understand that change is also tremendous opportunity for any Dr. Ben Burris inevitable. If something is going to orthodontist who is willing to adapt happen anyway it is far better to to the new reality and deliver what CLINICAL EDITOR embrace the change and figure out the customer wants on their timeline Dr. Derek Bock how to make it work for you than to and within their budget. The number vainly swim against the current in the of people receiving orthodontic name of quality. treatment will rise at an ever MARKETING/PATIENT Quality is probably the most misused increasing pace of the next decade - ACQUISITION EDITOR and dangerous word in orthodontics the question is who will be rendering Angela Weber these days. We orthodontists say the treatment? Orthodontists are quality when we want to defend what still in the best position to fill that WOMEN IN we do though we cannot reasonably need but only if we can shed our old, ORTHODONTICS EDITOR define quality or accurately assess the arbitrary and detrimental beliefs Dr. Courtney Dunn lack of quality of those with whom about who we are, what we do and we disagree. This age old tradition why. This edition of The Progressive BUSINESS OF of claiming the quality high ground Orthodontist Magazine is dedicated ORTHODONTICS EDITOR will likely be the downfall of many an to looking at some of the sources of so Chris Bentson orthodontist. called disruption that are positioning A lack of new patients and case themselves to harness patient demand starts is the bane of the profession and prosper by delivering what ORTHODONTIC POP now more than ever and this should customers want. Enjoy! CULTURE EDITOR Dr. Marc Ackerman be doubly worrisome given the strength of the economy, lack of PS In an attempt to disrupt our unemployment and high consumer normal operating procedure we have confidence. With all this, dare we ask also included a healthy dose of travel CLEAR ALIGNER EDITOR the question “Why aren’t more people journalism composed and submitted Sarah Sharfstein purchasing orthodontic services from by fellow orthodontists. We hope orthodontists?” The answers are clear these pieces inspire you to put in the TRADITIONAL OWNER/ to those who shed their blinders work so you can enjoy the play! OPERATOR PRACTICE and look at what we do from the MODEL EDITOR Dr. Jennifer Eisenhuth AAO AFFAIRS EDITOR INTERNATIONAL Dr. Anil Idiculla & The ORTHODONTICS EDITOR The Progressive Orthodontist AAO Committee on Dr. Grant Duncan magazine and study group are Communications your educational resources for new trends, progressive insights and best practices for building a successful WEALTH MANAGEMENT WEALTH MANAGEMENT orthodontic practice in 2018 and AND INVESTMENT EDITOR AND INVESTMENT EDITOR beyond. Dr. Aly Kanani Dr. John McManaman PUBLISHER - Amy Bradshaw ADVERTISE WITH US! CHECK US OUT ONLINE GRAPHIC DESIGNER - Megan Clark [email protected] WWW.THEPROORTHO.COM Q1 • 2018 | TheProOrtho.com 1 DR. CONTRIBUTORS JENNIFER EISENHUTH DR. BEN BURRIS Jennifer Eisenhuth Ben Burris DDS, MS is a DR. MARC graduated from The board-certified orthodontist Citadel in 1994 with ACKERMAN who began college intending to be a civil a BS in biology, spent engineer. After her undergraduate studies were Dr. Marc time working in complete, she came to her senses, entering Washington DC after Ackerman dental school at the University of Minnesota graduation, received a specializes in and upon graduation, began her orthodontic Rotary International the orthodontic residency at the University of Minnesota, Ambassadorial treatment earning both a certificate of orthodontics Scholarship and spent a year in Wellington of children with dentofacial deformity, and a Master’s of Oral Biology. After a failed NZ at Victoria University, graduated dental intellectual and physical disabilities and sleep associateship, she borrowed $60,000 from a friend and started her own practice, paying school with a DDS from The University of disordered breathing. He received his DMD from the University of Pennsylvania School this friend back within a few months. Since Tennessee in 2001, and graduated orthodontic then she has started, bought and sold several of Dental medicine in 1998 and his certificate residency in 2004 with an MDS from The practices in the Twin Cities metro area and University of Tennessee. In his short 13 in Orthodontics from the University of will continue to do so as long as the fun year career Burris' practice grew to over 20 Rochester-Eastman Dental Center in 2000. Dr. remains. Her orthodontic practice won the locations which he sold in April 2017. After Ackerman later completed his MBA in Executive “Best workplace 2014” by Minnesota Business the sale Burris is effectively retired and living Leadership at Jacksonville University Davis Monthly Magazine and she was recently in Orlando, Florida with his wife and two College of Business in 2009. Dr. Ackerman acknowledged by the University of Minnesota children but he's actively treating thousands is the Director of Orthodontics at Boston as a top entrepreneur. of cases via teledentistry and building what Children’s Hospital and teaches residents in both he calls a lifestyle office where he plans to pediatric dentistry and orthodontics for Harvard RYAN MOYNIHAN offer braces for 3000 dollars and Invisalign for School of Dental Medicine. 2000. Burris (and others) expect his new office Ryan Moynihan and unheard of price point to revolutionize has a financial/ how orthodontics is delivered and engage a analytical background significant percentage of the population in DR. LEON beginning his career orthodontic treatment. Burris founded S4L. KLEMPNER at Intel and Ernst & Young. He earned org, TheProOrtho.com, OrthoPundit.com & AMY his MBA from among other institutions in orthodontics and EPSTEIN is a driving force for change in the orthodontic Georgetown and has profession. Burris and Dr. Marc Ackerman spent the past 12 recently released a book, Straighter: The Rules Dr. Leon years of his career in the Dental/Orthodontic of Orthodontics and do a two-day course in Klempner, industry with 3M and Ormco. Most recently Orlando of the same name. a board- he was VP of Global Marketing (2 years) and Feel free to connect with Dr Burris so you certified VP of NA Sales (2 1/2 years) for Ormco. He can get a better understanding of who he is orthodontist was in private practice for over joined Gaidge in August 2017 as CEO.
Recommended publications
  • Enhancing the Predictability of Clear Aligners

    Enhancing the Predictability of Clear Aligners

    Enhancing Predictability of Clear Aligners Bowman DRASTIC PLASTIC: ENHANCING THE PREDICTABILITY OF CLEAR ALIGNERS S. Jay Bowman ABSTRACT Once limitations of clear aligner treatments were identified, conceptualizing techniques to improve the predictability in producing desired results was the next logical step. A variety of concepts, methods, and adjuncts have subsequently been introduced to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of clear aligners. As a consequence, the scope of biomechanics and type of malocclusions that can be more predictably treated has increased. As one example, the inclusion of miniscrew temporary skeletal anchorage has permitted the addition of direct and indirect anchorage to support and control more predictable programmed tooth movements with aligners. After reviewing the reported shortcomings of plastic aligners, this chapter explores possibilities for improving predictability of aligner therapy. KEY WORDS: Clear Aligners, Miniscrews, Bootstrap Elastic, Attachments, Bonded Buttons INTRODUCTION It has been 20 years since the introduction of a commercialized clear aligner product to the orthodontic marketplace. Based on suggestion by Harold D. Kesling over 50 years earlier, Invisalign and later, increasingly numerous propriety alternatives have come to pass; including the exponential growth of so-called direct-to-consumer (DTC or DIY) offerings [1]. From the original questions of whether even “acceptable” results could be obtained from a sequence of aligners, these queries have now evolved into: Is an orthodontist even needed to be interjected between the manufacturer’s plastic and their “customers?” So, the idea of moving teeth with plastic was nothing new, but the use of software to attempt to predict desired tooth movement and the associated 3D representations of individual tooth position were innovative.
  • Motion 3D Q&A

    Motion 3D Q&A

    THE SAGITTAL FIRST REVOLUTION CARRIERE® MOTION 3D™ Q&A Join the REVOLUTION! #TheHappinessRevolution CLINICAL ADVICE PROVIDED BY: Dr. Carrière received his dental degree from the University of Complutense in Madrid, in 1991. He then attended the University of Barcelona where Dr. Carrière completed his Orthodontic training and received his Master of Science in Orthodontics in 1994. In 2006, he received his Doctorate in Orthodontics, Cum Laude, from the University of Barcelona. Dr. Carrière was the Winner of the prestigious “Joseph E. Johnson Award” and the International Design Award Delta Gold ADI-FAD 2009 for the “Carriere Distalizer MB”. Dr. Carrière is also a Member of the Editorial Review Board for the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. As an invited professor of several Orthodontic departments throughout the world, Dr. Carrière lectures internationally when he is not treating patients in his private practice in Barcelona, Spain. Dr. Luis Carrière Dr. Paquette received his dental degree from UNC School of Dentistry in 1979 and a Master’s in Pediatric Dentistry from UNC in 1983. His Master’s thesis won a national research award that same year. He is board certified by the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. He obtained his Master’s degree and specialty certificate in orthodontics from the St. Louis University in 1990. Dr. Paquette’s Master’s thesis in orthodontics won the coveted Milo Hellman award in 1991. He is an active member of the Schulman Group. Dr. Paquette is passionate about advancing the art and science of orthodontics. He has published numerous articles and lectures nationally and internationally.
  • Stability of Anterior Open Bite Treatment with Molar Intrusion Using Skeletal

    Stability of Anterior Open Bite Treatment with Molar Intrusion Using Skeletal

    González Espinosa et al. Progress in Orthodontics (2020) 21:35 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-020-00328-2 REVIEW Open Access Stability of anterior open bite treatment with molar intrusion using skeletal anchorage: a systematic review and meta- analysis Daybelis González Espinosa1,2, Paulo Eliezer de Oliveira Moreira1, Amanda Silva da Sousa1, Carlos Flores-Mir3 and David Normando1* Abstract Objectives: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the degree of stability of anterior open bite (AOB) treatment performed through the molar intrusion supported with skeletal anchorage at least 1 year posttreatment. Methods: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42016037513). A literature search was conducted to identify randomized (RCT) or non-randomized clinical trials based including those considering before and after design. Data sources were electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Science Direct, Google Scholar, Scopus, Lilacs, OpenGrey, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov. The quality of evidence was assessed through the JBI tool and certainty of evidence was evaluated through the GRADE tool. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted when appropriate. Results: Six hundred twenty-four articles met the initial inclusion criteria. From these, only 6 remained. The mean posttreatment follow-up time was 2.5 years (SD = 1.04). The overbite showed a standardized mean relapse of − 1.23 mm (95% CI − 1.64, − 0.81, p < 0.0001). Maxillary and mandibular incisors presented a non-significant mean relapse, U1-PP − 0.04 mm (95% CI − 0.55, 0.48) and L1-MP − 0.10 mm (95% CI − 0.57, 0.37). Molar intrusion showed a relapse rate around 12% for the maxillary molars and a 27.2% for mandibular molars.
  • TITLE PAGE Treatment Outcome with Orthodontic Aligners and Fixed

    TITLE PAGE Treatment Outcome with Orthodontic Aligners and Fixed

    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2020 Treatment outcome with orthodontic aligners and fixed appliances: a systematic review with meta-analyses Papageorgiou, Spyridon N ; Koletsi, Despina ; Iliadi, Anna ; Peltomaki, Timo ; Eliades, Theodore Abstract: Background: The use of orthodontic aligners to treat a variety of malocclusions has seen considerable increase in the last years, yet evidence about their efficacy and adverse effects relative to conventional fixed orthodontic appliances remains unclear. Objective: This systematic review assesses the efficacy of aligners and fixed appliances for comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Search methods: Eight databases were searched without limitations in April 2019. Selection criteria: Randomized or matched non-randomized studies. Data collection and analysis: Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment was done independently in triplicate. Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted, followed by sensitivity analyses, and the GRADE analysis of the evidence quality.Results: A total of 11 studies (4 randomized/7 non-randomized) were included comparing aligners with braces (887 patients; mean age 28.0 years; 33% male). Moderate quality evidence indicated that treatment with orthodontic aligners is associated with worse occlusal outcome with the American Board of Orthodontics Objective Grading System (3 studies; MD = 9.9; 95% CI = 3.6-16.2) and more patients with unacceptable results (3 studies; RR = 1.6; 95% CI = 1.2-2.0). No significant differences were seen for treatment duration. The main limitations of existing evidence pertained to risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of included studies.
  • Distalization of the Mandibular Dentition with Mini-Implants to Correct a Class III Malocclusion with a Midline Deviation

    Distalization of the Mandibular Dentition with Mini-Implants to Correct a Class III Malocclusion with a Midline Deviation

    CASE REPORT Distalization of the mandibular dentition with mini-implants to correct a Class III malocclusion with a midline deviation Kyu-Rhim Chung,a Seong-Hun Kim,b HyeRan Choo,c Yoon-Ah Kook,d and Jason B. Copee Uijongbu and Seoul, Korea, Philadelphia, Pa, and Dallas, Tex This article describes the orthodontic treatment for a young woman, aged 23 years 5 months, with a Class III malocclusion and a deviated midline. Two orthodontic mini-implants (C-implants, CIMPLANT Company, Seoul, Korea) were placed in the interdental spaces between the mandibular second premolars and first mo- lars. The treatment plan consisted of distalizing the mandibular dentition asymmetrically and creating space for en-masse retraction of the mandibular anterior teeth. C-implants were placed to provide anchorage for Class I intra-arch elastics. The head design of the C-implant minimizes gingival irritation during orthodontic treatment. Sliding jigs were applied buccally for distalization of the mandibular posterior teeth. The active treatment period was 18 months. Normal overbite and overjet were obtained, and facial balance was improved. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:135-46) very orthodontic tooth movement is accompa- patients. Therefore, several authors have attempted to nied by a reaction. This can make it difficult to treat this type of malocclusion by distal tooth movement Ecorrect a malocclusion by using intraoral appli- alone. For example, animal studies and clinical investi- ances alone, especially when complete distal movement gations have used conventional implants as absolute of the mandibular dentition is planned in nonsurgical anchorage2-4 and miniplates for intrusion or distalization Class III malocclusion treatment.
  • Upper Anterior Intrusion with Mini-Implants to Correct Anterior Deep Bite in a Periodontally Compromised Class II Malocclusion

    Upper Anterior Intrusion with Mini-Implants to Correct Anterior Deep Bite in a Periodontally Compromised Class II Malocclusion

    www.medigraphic.org.mx Revista Mexicana de Ortodoncia Vol. 2, No. 2 April-June 2014 pp 105-111 CASE REPORT Upper anterior intrusion with mini-implants to correct anterior deep bite in a periodontally compromised class II malocclusion. Case report Intrusión del segmento anterior superior con miniimplantes para eliminar la mordida profunda anterior en maloclusión clase II con compromiso periodontal. Reporte de un caso Carlos Eder Zamudio López,* Silvia Tavira Fernández§ ABSTRACT RESUMEN The use of mini-implants has revolutioned biomechanics in or- El uso de miniimplantes ha revolucionado la biomecánica de thodontics with better results as far as anchorage is concerned. We la ortodoncia con mejores resultados en cuanto al anclaje se have no limits when using these attachments depending only on refi ere. No hay límites al momento de utilizar estos aditamentos, our imagination. Anterior deep bites in severe class II malocclusion y depende únicamente de nuestra imaginación. Las mordidas patients are a common problem that causes orthodontists to focus profundas en la región anterior son un problema frecuente en therapy in biomechanics to eliminate the problem by extrusion of los pacientes con clase II severa, lo que nos obliga a enfocar posterior teeth or intrusion of the anterior. In this case, we decided nuestra terapéutica en una mecánica a corregir el problema to correct the anterior deep bite by intruding the incisors using as mediante la extrusión de los dientes posteriores, o bien, mediante anchorage two mini-implants. The case was compromised by perio- la intrusión de los dientes anteriores. En este caso, decidimos dontal disease with moderated loss of alveolar bone so we had to corregir la mordida profunda anterior mediante la intrusión de los choose biomechanics with a stable anchorage to achieve our goals.
  • SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)

    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ☒ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the annual period ended December 31, 2019 or ☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from ________ to________ Commission File Number: 001-39037 SMILEDIRECTCLUB, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 83-4505317 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 414 Union Street Nashville, TN 37219 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (800) 848-7566 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Not applicable (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Trading Symbol(s) Name of each exchange on which registered Class A common stock, par value $0.0001 per share SDC The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
  • Orthodontic Treatment of Class Three Malocclusion Using Clear Aligners

    Orthodontic Treatment of Class Three Malocclusion Using Clear Aligners

    Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research 9 (2019) 360–362 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jobcr Case study Orthodontic treatment of class three malocclusion using clear aligners: A case report T ∗ Edoardo Staderini , Simonetta Meuli, Patrizia Gallenzi Institute of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Largo A, Gemelli N°1, Rome, RM, 00168, Italy ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Class III malocclusion is a growth-related challenging condition for orthodontists. We present a case of a 11-year- Angle class III old girl with a skeletal class III malocclusion with bilateral cross bite, and a functional shift of the lower dental Clear aligner midline. A multiphase clear aligners' treatment was scheduled with the aim of removing all dental interferences Interceptive orthodontic treatment which involved an anterior displacement of the mandible. At one-year follow-up, clear aligners’ therapy resulted in skeletal and dental improvements. Clear aligners therapy represents a valid alternative to fixed appliance therapy in the early interception of class III malocclusion. The present manuscript was prepared following the CARE guidelines. 1. Introduction relation was noticed.4 At intraoral evaluation, the patient presented a late mixed dentition with a bilateral class III malocclusion, along with a Class III malocclusion is a challenging dentoalveolar growth defor- functional mandibular lateral deviation towards the patient's left side, mity, affecting between 5.5% and 19.4% of the population.1 Early without any sign or symptom of temporomandibular joint disorders.
  • CASE REPORT “Surgery-First” Approach with Invisalign Therapy to Correct a Class II Malocclusion and Severe Mandibular Retrognathism

    CASE REPORT “Surgery-First” Approach with Invisalign Therapy to Correct a Class II Malocclusion and Severe Mandibular Retrognathism

    @2019 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission. www.jco-online.com CASE REPORT “Surgery-First” Approach with Invisalign Therapy to Correct a Class II Malocclusion and Severe Mandibular Retrognathism JOY CHANG, BS, DDS, MDS DEREK STEINBACHER, DMD, MD RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MS, PhD FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS or patients with severe skeletal jaw discrepancies, the combination of orthodontics with orthognathic surgery is often the only approach that Fcan both harmonize facial esthetics and restore functional occlusion.1 Unfortunately, conventional presurgical orthodontics involves a lengthy de- compensation period that worsens the patient’s facial appearance and ex- acerbates the malocclusion.2,3 Many patients pursuing surgical-orthodontic treatment are adults who wish to avoid a deterioration in their profile and facial appearance during presurgical orthodontics.4 Dr. Chang Dr. Steinbacher Dr. Nanda Dr. Uribe Dr. Chang is a former Resident; Dr. Nanda is Professor Emeritus; and Dr. Uribe is an Associate Professor, Postgraduate Program Director, and Charles J. Burstone Endowed Professor, Division of Orthodontics, Department of Craniofacial Sciences, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, Farmington, CT. Dr. Steinbacher is an Associate Professor of Plastic Surgery, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, and Director of Dental Services, Oral Maxillofacial and Craniofacial Surgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT. Dr. Chang is in the private practice of ortho- dontics in San Jose, CA. Dr. Nanda is also an Associate Editor and Dr. Uribe is a Contributing Editor of the Journal of Clinical Orthodontics. E-mail Dr. Uribe at [email protected]. VOLUME LIII NUMBER 7 © 2019 JCO, Inc. 397 SURGERY-FIRST WITH INVISALIGN TO CORRECT CLASS II MALOCCLUSION Fig.
  • Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations

    Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations

    Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion in Adults: Biomechanical Considerations FLAVIO URIBE, DDS, MDS RAVINDRA NANDA, BDS, MDS, PHD reatment of Class II malocclusion in adoles- inclined upper central and lower incisors, and Tcents has always relied on growth modifica- labially flared maxillary lateral incisors. These tion. The majority of treatment modalities, such patients also tend to exhibit problems with the as functional appliances, are directed at stopping upper and lower occlusal planes, such as deep or redirecting maxillary growth and simultane- curves of Spee. The soft-tissue drape of the lips ously stimulating mandibular growth.1-3 On the often conforms to the malocclusion, so that the other hand, in adult patients with severe Class II lips may be redundant with a deep mentolabial malocclusions, generally involving extremely sulcus. Because of the deep bite and supraerup- deficient mandibles, orthognathic surgery is tion of the maxillary incisors, the gingival mar- often the only possible treatment. gins of the maxillary anterior teeth are usually Although camouflage may be attempted by malaligned, and the lingually inclined mandibu- extracting premolars, the soft-tissue objectives lar incisors may have excessively high gingival may be impossible to meet. Even so, a recent margins (Fig. 1). study has shown that patient satisfaction with camouflage treatment was similar to that achieved with surgical mandibular advance- ment.4 In Class II patients with mild-to-moderate skeletal discrepancies, dental compensation may well be the treatment of choice. Common treat- ment procedures for such patients include flaring of incisors, interproximal tooth reduction, and extractions. Treatment of an adult Class II patient requires careful diagnosis and a treatment plan involving esthetic, occlusal, and functional con- siderations.5-7 The treatment objectives must include the chief complaint of the patient, and A the mechanics plan should be individualized based on the specific treatment goals.
  • Anterior Crossbite and Crowding Correction with a Series of Clear Aligners: Case Report

    Anterior Crossbite and Crowding Correction with a Series of Clear Aligners: Case Report

    Article ID: WMC005610 ISSN 2046-1690 Anterior crossbite and crowding correction with a series of clear aligners: case report Peer review status: No Corresponding Author: Dr. Amira Al Habash, dentist, Policlinica Identalia - Italy Submitting Author: Dr. Amira Al Habash, dentist, Policlinica Identalia - Italy Other Authors: Dr. David Raickovic, dentist, Policlinica Identalia - Croatia Article ID: WMC005610 Article Type: Case Report Submitted on:18-Mar-2020, 06:16:34 PM GMT Published on: 24-Mar-2020, 02:51:34 AM GMT Article URL: http://www.webmedcentral.com/article_view/5610 Subject Categories:ORTHODONTICS Keywords:orthodontics, clear aligners, invisalign, dentistry, crossbite, oral medicine How to cite the article:Al Habash A, Raickovic D. Anterior crossbite and crowding correction with a series of clear aligners: case report. WebmedCentral ORTHODONTICS 2020;11(3):WMC005610 Copyright: This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Source(s) of Funding: The authors declare that they have not received funding. WebmedCentral > Case Report Page 1 of 10 WMC005610 Downloaded from http://www.webmedcentral.com on 24-Mar-2020, 02:51:35 AM Anterior crossbite and crowding correction with a series of clear aligners: case report Author(s): Al Habash A, Raickovic D Introduction aesthetics of the smile (Figs. 1, 2). Clinical examination revealed class I subdivision with lower midline deviation towards the left of the upper midline, a severe crowding in the inferior (Fig. 4) Nowadays, there is a growing demand for aesthetic dental arch, with the presence of cross bite against the treatment among both adolescents and adults.
  • Invisalign Treatment Planning Guide 1 Align Technology, Inc

    Invisalign Treatment Planning Guide 1 Align Technology, Inc

    Table of Contents INTRODUCTION . 2 Getting Quality Clinical Outcomes with Invisalign. 2 Invisalign Applicability . 3 DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT OPTIONS 1. Crowding . 4 2. Spacing. 10 3. Narrow Arches . 16 4. Crossbite. 20 5. Deep Bite . 24 6. Open Bite . 28 7. Class II . 32 Invisalign 8. Class III . 38 CLINICAL NOTES Treatment IPR . 5 Tooth Size Discrepancy . 11 Planning Staging . 12 Auxiliary Treatment. 12 Guide Expansion . 17 Attachments. 25 Anchorage . 42 APPENDIX Prescription Form Tips. 44 Glossary . 46 Index. 48 Credits . 54 Invisalign Treatment Planning Guide 1 Align Technology, Inc. Introduction HOW TO USE THIS GUIDE Getting Quality Clinical The guide is organized by patient diagnosis. ABOUT THIS GUIDE Match your patient’s diagnosis to the appropriate Outcomes with Invisalign The goal of this guide is to provide you with a diagnosis decision tree to see some possible treat- decision making tool you can use while selecting ment options. Read the accompanying treatment Successful clinical outcomes with Invisalign and treatment planning your Invisalign cases. notes and evaluate your options given your start with attention to detail during case By outlining typically used Invisalign approaches Invisalign experience level. See Figure A, below. selection and treatment planning. Here are and discussing their complexity and predict- five guidelines for setting up your cases that ABOUT THIS SERIES ability, we hope to make the treatment planning pay great dividends later: This guide is the first in a three-part series options and implications more clear for you of Invisalign patient care references, comple- to evaluate. 1. Submit high quality records. Accurate menting the ClinCheck® Evaluation Guide PVS impressions and clear patient photos and (D4458) and the Invisalign Clinical Monitoring Align Technology is not a provider of medical, radiographs are critical for the creation of your Guide (D4219).