DOCSLIB.ORG

IV the Roman Paterfamilias

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IV the Roman Paterfamilias This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Elite Father and Son Relationships in Republican Rome Lauren Murray PhD The University of Edinburgh 2014 Signed declaration This thesis has been composed by the candidate, the work is the candidate's own and the work has not been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification except as specified. Signed: [2] Contents Abstract Acknowledgements Abbreviations Introduction ................................................................................................................ 11 Scholarship on the Roman Family ..................................................................... 14 Literary and Historical Sources .......................................................................... 24 Legal Sources and Patria Potestas .................................................................... 33 Demography ....................................................................................................... 39 Social Ideals and Social Reality ......................................................................... 44 I: Roman State, Roman Statesman, Roman Father ................................................... 54 The Ideology of Fatherhood ............................................................................... 56 The Patres ........................................................................................................... 57 City as Father ..................................................................................................... 62 II: Images of the Aristocratic Father .......................................................................... 75 Section 1: The Greek Interpretation ....................................................................... 78 Section 2: The ius vitae necisque ........................................................................... 88 Brutus and his sons ............................................................................................ 94 Titus Manlius Torquatus (cos. 347 BC) ........................................................... 106 III: The Roman Son .................................................................................................. 123 Section 1: Social Ideals and the Roman Son ........................................................ 126 Pietas ................................................................................................................ 127 Upholding the Family Name ............................................................................ 135 Section 2: Social Expectations of Father and Son Relationships in the Pro Sex. Roscio Amerino ................................................................................................... 143 Duty and the Family ......................................................................................... 144 Natural Feeling ................................................................................................. 150 IV: The Roman Paterfamilias .................................................................................. 158 Section 1: Social Ideals and the Roman Father .................................................... 161 Literary Dedications ......................................................................................... 163 Paternal Exempla .............................................................................................. 166 Authority .......................................................................................................... 169 Section 2: Self-presentation and the Domus ........................................................ 173 The Family and the City ................................................................................... 174 Influence in the State ........................................................................................ 177 Section 3: Adoption and Roman Family Concerns .............................................. 182 [4] Forms of Roman Adoption .............................................................................. 182 Family Ties ...................................................................................................... 185 Case Study: Aemilius Paullus and his Sons ..................................................... 189 V: The Relationship between Father and Son .......................................................... 196 Section 1: Upbringing .......................................................................................... 198 Birth ................................................................................................................. 199 Childhood ......................................................................................................... 203 Education.......................................................................................................... 209 Section 2: Roman Fathers and Adult Sons ........................................................... 216 Literary Depictions........................................................................................... 216 Conflict ............................................................................................................. 223 Family Reputation ............................................................................................ 230 Section 3: Death and Its Implications .................................................................. 233 Grief ................................................................................................................. 234 Continuity ......................................................................................................... 244 VI: The Ideal of the Roman Father .......................................................................... 252 Republican Fathers ........................................................................................... 254 Romulus ........................................................................................................... 257 [5] The Aeneid ....................................................................................................... 260 Father Anchises ................................................................................................ 263 Father Aeneas ................................................................................................... 267 Conclusion ............................................................................................................... 274 Appendix .................................................................................................................. 280 Bibliography ............................................................................................................. 283 [6] Abstract The focus of this study is aristocratic fathers and sons in the middle and late Roman Republic (264 – 27 B.C.). By considering legal, literary, and material evidence, it addresses the behaviour of elite families throughout this period. Although there is a great deal of important research conducted on family relations in the ancient world more generally, there is no extensive study which analyses the bonds of duty, obligation, and affection between fathers and sons in republican Rome. It is this gap in the scholarship which is addressed in my thesis. The key aspects of this relationship are considered through several interconnected chapters. Each reflects the social nature of this analysis, and demonstrates that traditional values, dynastic considerations, and social ideals promoted a sense of common identity and unity within the household. Although the hierarchical nature of Roman family life also provided opportunities for conflict between father and son, ultimately the relationship between the two was governed by these three concerns, as well as the close correlation between public and private in the lives of the republican elite. The discussion begins by considering the high valuation of fatherhood at Rome, evidenced by the use of terms derived from pater, and argues that the qualities expected of this individual were similar to those associated with the ideal statesman (Ch. I). From there, depictions of the Roman father by Greek and Roman authors are analysed to show that the former often emphasised the morality of the episode in question, while the latter stressed the conflict between the well-being of the family and the safety of the state (Ch. II). The argument then moves on to explore social expectations. Cicero’s Pro Roscio Amerino provides an example in which the ideals for father and son relationships are manipulated in order to persuade an audience (Ch. III). This shows that pietas, duty, companionship, and support towards
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Valerius Maximus on Vice: a Commentary of Facta Et Dicta
    Valerius Maximus on Vice: A Commentary on Facta et Dicta Memorabilia 9.1-11 Jeffrey Murray University of Cape Town Thesis Presented for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in the School of Languages and Literatures University of Cape Town June 2016 The copyright of this thesis vests in the author. No quotation from it or information derived from it is to be published without full acknowledgement of the source. The thesis is to be used for private study or non- commercial research purposes only. Published by the University of Cape Town (UCT) in terms of the non-exclusive license granted to UCT by the author. University of Cape Town Abstract The Facta et Dicta Memorabilia of Valerius Maximus, written during the formative stages of the Roman imperial system, survives as a near unique instance of an entire work composed in the genre of Latin exemplary literature. By providing the first detailed historical and historiographical commentary on Book 9 of this prose text – a section of the work dealing principally with vice and immorality – this thesis examines how an author employs material predominantly from the earlier, Republican, period in order to validate the value system which the Romans believed was the basis of their world domination and to justify the reign of the Julio-Claudian family. By detailed analysis of the sources of Valerius’ material, of the way he transforms it within his chosen genre, and of how he frames his exempla, this thesis illuminates the contribution of an often overlooked author to the historiography of the Roman Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Piracy
    Denver Journal of International Law & Policy Volume 15 Number 2 Winter/Spring Article 2 May 2020 The Law of Piracy Alfred P. Rubin Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/djilp Recommended Citation Alfred P. Rubin, The Law of Piracy, 15 Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y 173 (1987). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the University of Denver Sturm College of Law at Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Journal of International Law & Policy by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],dig- [email protected]. ARTICLES The Law of Piracy ALFRED P. RUBIN* "Pirate ... Middle English from Latin pirata, from Greek peirates, 'at- tacker,' from peiran, to attempt, attack, from peira, an attempt . From Indo-European root per-." "per- . To try, risk;" from which come the modern English words: fear, peril, experience, expert, empire, and pirate. American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language (W. Morris, ed.) (1969), 998, 1534. I. THE ORIGINS A. Introduction The word "piracy" is used in modern English in many different ways, from a half-admiring description of the shrewd practices of an assertive businessman cutting the corners of morality but strictly within the law, to a highly technical legal word of art related to some crimes for which peo- ple have been hanged. In between lie uses that relate to unrecognized rebels, naval vessels acting beyond their authority, naval vessels acting within their national commissions to interfere with peaceful commerce in ways the international legal order will not tolerate, and many other shades of meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage in Classical Rome – Just a Tiresome Necessity?! ! © Maria Dettenhofer, © DAMALS 01/1998
    Marriage in Classical Rome – just a Tiresome Necessity?! ! © Maria Dettenhofer, © DAMALS 01/1998 (Translated by Graham Pascoe, section headings by MoneyMuseum) As in Athens, marriage in Rome was originally based on custom and tradition. But in contrast to Athens, the political system scarcely affected the nature of marriage. Only on the change from the republic to the empire did interference in private life become clearly detectable. Marriage as duty and privilege In republican Rome, marriage was viewed as a social obligation, and by men apparently rather as a tiresome necessity. When the censor of the year 131 BC, Q. Metellus Macedonicus, called upon his fellow citizens to enter into marriage, he expressed himself in drastic terms: "If we could live without wives, we would be free of tiresome matters. But since Nature has so arranged things that we cannot live very comfortably with them, but cannot live at all without them, we must think rather of our long-term welfare rather than our short-term pleasure." That clearly shows that marriage was seen as a community of purpose: it existed to maintain the family and to provide for old age through the raising of legitimate children. Under the Roman republic there was no legal obligation to marry, but it is noticeable that in contrast to Athens the preconditions and forms of marriage were established at an early period and varied very widely. From the early republican period (510 BC onwards) certain conditions had to be fulfilled for a marriage to be regarded as a valid marriage from which legitimate children could spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Hic Tacitus Lapis: Voice, Audience, and Space in Early Roman Verse-Epitaphs
    HIC TACITUS LAPIS: VOICE, AUDIENCE, AND SPACE IN EARLY ROMAN VERSE-EPITAPHS A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Cornell University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Allison Catherine Boex August 2014 © 2014 Allison Catherine Boex HIC TACITUS LAPIS: VOICE, AUDIENCE AND, SPACE IN EARLY ROMAN VERSE-EPITAPHS Allison Catherine Boex, Ph. D. Cornell University 2014 This dissertation sets out to investigate the content, role, and effects of ancient Roman grave-inscriptions; I argue that Roman gravestones and their inscriptions were intended to serve as metonymic markers, stand-ins for their deceased subjects in the land of the living, allowing the dead to engage with the living and the living with the dead. As many previous studies of Roman grave-inscriptions have been undermined by the fact that their authors attempt to address the entire body of Roman epitaphs (a corpus too large and diverse to allow productive study of its entirety), this dissertation focuses on a smaller corpus, the forty-nine extant verse-inscriptions generally assigned to the Roman Republic. In investigating these epitaphs, I focus on the effects of the reading-act and the related issues of voice, audience, and space; my approach is informed by the works of Svenbro (1993) and Vallette-Cagnac (1997) on the reading- act in ancient Greece and Rome respectively, Sourvinou-Inwood’s (1995) study of voice in ancient Greek epitaphs, and Lowrie’s (2006) work on deixis and its effects on the reader’s perception of presence and absence. I argue that the reading-act of the passer-by activates a depiction of the deceased’s life, tied to the stone as the metonymic marker of the deceased; it is through this depiction that the figure of the deceased can engage, implicitly and explicitly, with the living upon each reading of the inscription.
    [Show full text]
  • “At the Sight of the City Utterly Perishing Amidst the Flames Scipio Burst Into
    Aurelii are one of the three major Human subgroups within western Eramus, and the founders of the mighty (some say “Eternal”) “At the sight of the city utterly perishing Aurelian Empire. They are a sturdy, amidst the flames Scipio burst into tears, conservative group, prone to religious fervor and stood long reflecting on the inevitable and philosophical revelry in equal measure. change which awaits cities, nations, and Adding to this a taste for conquest, and is it dynasties, one and all, as it does every one any wonder the Aurelii spread their of us men. This, he thought, had befallen influence, like a mighty eagle spreading its Ilium, once a powerful city, and the once wings, across the known world? mighty empires of the Assyrians, Medes, Persians, and that of Macedonia lately so splendid. And unintentionally or purposely he quoted---the words perhaps escaping him Aurelii stand a head shorter than most unconsciously--- other humans, but their tightly packed "The day shall be when holy Troy shall forms hold enough muscle for a man twice fall their height. Their physical endurance is And Priam, lord of spears, and Priam's legendary amongst human and elf alike. folk." Only the Brutum are said to be hardier, And on my asking him boldly (for I had and even then most would place money on been his tutor) what he meant by these the immovable Aurelian. words, he did not name Rome distinctly, but Skin color among the Aurelii is quite was evidently fearing for her, from this sight fluid, running from pale to various shades of the mutability of human affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Handout Name Yourself Like a Roman (CLAS 160)
    NAME YOURSELF LIKE A ROMAN Choose Your Gender 0 Roman naming conventions differed for men and women, and the Romans didn’t conceive of other options or categories (at least for naming purposes!). For viri (men): Choose Your Praenomen (“first name”) 1 This is your personal name, just like modern American first names: Michael, Jonathan, Jason, etc. The Romans used a very limited number of first names and tended to be very conservative about them, reusing the same small number of names within families. In the Roman Republic, your major options are: Some of these names (Quintus, Sextus, • Appius • Manius • Servius Septimus, etc.) clearly originally referred • Aulus • Marcus • Sextus to birth order: Fifth, Sixth, Seventh. Others are related to important aspects of • Decimus • Numerius • Spurius Roman culture: the name Marcus probably • Gaius • Postumus • Statius comes from the god Mars and Tiberius from the river Tiber. Other are mysterious. • Gnaeus • Publius • Tiberius But over time, these names lost their • Lucius • Quintus • Titus original significance and became hereditary, with sons named after their • Mamercus • Septimus • Vibius father or another male relative. Choose Your Nomen (“family name”) 2 Your second name identifies you by gens: family or clan, much like our modern American last name. While praenomina vary between members of the same family, the nomen is consistent. Some famous nomina include Claudius, Cornelius, Fabius, Flavius, Julius, Junius, and Valerius. Side note: if an enslaved person was freed or a foreigner was granted citizenship, they were technically adopted into the family of their “patron,” and so received his nomen as well. De Boer 2020 OPTIONAL: Choose Your Cognomen (“nickname”) Many Romans had just a praenomen and a nomen, and it was customary and polite to address a 3 person by this combo (as in “hello, Marcus Tullius, how are you today?” “I am well, Gaius Julius, and you?”).
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Republic in 5 Timelines (Teacher Guide and Notes)
    1 180 BC: lex Villia Annalis – a law regulating the minimum ages at which a individual could how political office at each stage of the cursus honorum (career path). This was a step to regularising a political career and enforcing limits. 146 BC: The fall of Carthage in North Africa and Corinth in Greece effectively brought an end to Rome’s large overseas campaigns for control of the Mediterranean. This is the point that the historian Sallust sees as the beginning of the decline of the Republic, as Rome had no rivals to compete with and so turn inwards, corrupted by greed. 139 BC: lex Gabinia tabelleria– the first of several laws introduced by tribunes to ensure secret ballots for for voting within the assembliess (this one applied to elections of magistrates). 133 BC – the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus, who along with his younger brother, is seen as either a social reformer or a demagogue. He introduced an agrarian land that aimed to distribute Roman public land to the poorer elements within Roman society (although this act quite likely increased tensions between the Italian allies and Rome, because it was land on which the Italians lived that was be redistributed). He was killed in 132 BC by a band of senators led by the pontifex maximus (chief priest), because they saw have as a political threat, who was allegedly aiming at kingship. 2 123-121 BC – the younger brother of Tiberius Gracchus, Gaius Gracchus was tribune in 123 and 122 BC, passing a number of laws, which apparent to have aimed to address a number of socio-economic issues and inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Leges Regiae
    DIPARTIMENTO IURA SEZIONE STORIA DEL DIRITTO UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PALERMO ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO (Aupa) Fontes - 3.1 Revisione ed integrazione dei Fontes Iuris Romani Anteiustiniani (FIRA) Studi preparatori I Leges a cura di Gianfranco Purpura G. Giappichelli Editore - Torino DIPARTIMENTO IURA SEZIONE STORIA DEL DIRITTO UNIVERSITÀ DEGLI STUDI DI PALERMO ANNALI DEL SEMINARIO GIURIDICO (AuPA) Fontes - 3.1 Revisione ed integrazione dei Fontes Iuris Romani Anteiustiniani (FIRA) Studi preparatori I Leges a cura di Gianfranco Purpura G. Giappichelli Editore - Torino © Copyright 2012 - G. GIAPPICHELLI EDITORE - TORINO VIA PO, 21 - TEL. 011-81.53.111 - FAX 011-81.25.100 http://www.giappichelli.it ISBN/EAN 978-88-348-3821-1 Il presente volume viene pubblicato con il contributo dei fondi PRIN 2008, nell’ambito della ricerca dal titolo “Revisione ed integrazione dei Fontes Iuris Romani Antejustiniani – FIRA”, coordinata dal Prof. Gianfranco Purpura. Stampa: OfficineT ipografiche Aiello & Provenzano s.r.l. Sede legale ed amministrativa: Via del Cavaliere, 93 - Tel. +39.091.903327 +39.091.902385 Fax +39.091.909419 - Stabilimento: Via del Cavaliere, 87/g - Tel. +39.091.901873 90011 Bagheria (PA) Le fotocopie per uso personale del lettore possono essere effettuate nei limiti del 15% di ciascun volume/fascicolo di periodico dietro pagamento alla SIAE del compenso previsto dall’art. 68, commi 4 e 5, della legge 22 aprile 1941, n. 633. Le fotocopie effettuate per finalità di carattere professionale, economico o commerciale o comunque per uso diverso da quello personale possono essere effettuate a seguito di specifica autorizzazione rilasciata da CLEARedi, Centro Licenze e Autorizzazioni per le Riproduzioni Editoriali, Corso di Porta Romana 108, 20122 Milano, e-mail [email protected] e sito web www.clearedi.org INDICE Prefazione (G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry Erika Zimmermann Damer A dissertation submitted to the faculty of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Classics. Chapel Hill 2010 Approved by: Sharon James, advisor. James O’Hara, reader. Alison Keith, reader. Paul Allen Miller, reader. Eric Downing, reader. i © 2010 Erika Zimmermann Damer ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT ERIKA ZIMMERMANN DAMER: The Female Body in Latin Love Poetry (Under the direction of Sharon James) This dissertation seeks to rethink the female body in Latin love elegy in its aesthetic and political significance, and argues that the sexualized body creates poetic subjectivity. It juxtaposes close readings of the elegies of Tibullus, Propertius, and Ovid alongside contemporary theorizations of the female body found in Irigaray, Kristeva, and Grosz. By expanding critical focus to encompass all the women of elegy, this dissertation demonstrates a surprising ambivalence towards the female body in a genre that claims to celebrate female beauty, and offers a new view of elegy’s role within Roman conceptions of gender, sexuality, bodies, and empire. Chapter one offers a brief introduction to contemporary feminist theories of the body as well as an overview of critical literature on the elegiac body. Chapter two examines Lucretius’ diatribe against love, Horace Epodes 8 and 12, and the Augustan marital legislation as major background for elegy’s female body.
    [Show full text]
  • Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, C.319–50 BC
    Ex senatu eiecti sunt: Expulsion from the Senate of the Roman Republic, c.319–50 BC Lee Christopher MOORE University College London (UCL) PhD, 2013 1 Declaration I, Lee Christopher MOORE, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Thesis abstract One of the major duties performed by the censors of the Roman Republic was that of the lectio senatus, the enrolment of the Senate. As part of this process they were able to expel from that body anyone whom they deemed unequal to the honour of continued membership. Those expelled were termed ‘praeteriti’. While various aspects of this important and at-times controversial process have attracted scholarly attention, a detailed survey has never been attempted. The work is divided into two major parts. Part I comprises four chapters relating to various aspects of the lectio. Chapter 1 sees a close analysis of the term ‘praeteritus’, shedding fresh light on senatorial demographics and turnover – primarily a demonstration of the correctness of the (minority) view that as early as the third century the quaestorship conveyed automatic membership of the Senate to those who held it. It was not a Sullan innovation. In Ch.2 we calculate that during the period under investigation, c.350 members were expelled. When factoring for life expectancy, this translates to a significant mean lifetime risk of expulsion: c.10%. Also, that mean risk was front-loaded, with praetorians and consulars significantly less likely to be expelled than subpraetorian members.
    [Show full text]
  • LES NOMS DES ROMAINS © Nadia Pla 1. Le « PRAENOMEN
    LES NOMS DES ROMAINS © Nadia Pla 1. Le « PRAENOMEN » (prénom) : - liste des 11 prénoms essentiellement utilisés par les Romains, suivis de leur abréviation et, quand on la connaît, de leur signification : Aulus (A.) Gaius ou Caius (C.) Gnaeus ou Cnaeus (Cn.) Decimus (D.) (10e enfant) Lucius (L.) (né avec la lumière) Marcus (M.) Publius (P.) (du peuple) Quintus (Q.) (5e enfant) Sextus (Sex.) (6e enfant) Tiberius (Ti.) (du Tibre (fleuve de Rome)) Titus (T.) - liste des 7 autres prénoms, utilisés seulement dans certaines familles : Appius (App.) Kaeso (K.) (né par césarienne) Mamercus (Mam.) Manius (M'.) (né le matin) Numerius (N.) (calculateur) Servius (S.) (descendant d'esclave) Spurius (Sp.) (bâtard) 2. Le « GENTILE NOMEN » (nom de famille) : liste de quelques uns des plus célèbres noms de familles romaines, suivis, quand on la connaît, de leur signification Aelius Junius (descendant de Junon ?) Aemilius Laberius Annæus Laelius Antonius Licinius (aux cheveux relevés sur le front) Asinius (âne) Livius (bleuté, livide) Aufidius Lucilius (fils de Lucius) Aurelius (doré) Lucretius Caecilius (aveugle) Lutatius Caelius (céleste) Manilius (fils de Manius) Calpurnius Manlius Cassius (inutile) Marcellus (petit Marcus) Claudius (boîteux) Marcius (fils de Marcus) Cornelius (corne) Memmius Domitius (dompteur) Menenius Fabius (fève) Metellus Fannius Mucius Flaminius (prêtre flamine) Octavius (8e enfant) Flavius (blond) Papirius Fufidius Plautius (pieds plats) Fufius Pompeius (pompeux, cérémonieux) Furius (fou furieux) Pomponius Gabinius Porcius (porc) Gellius Publilius (fils de Publius) Helvius (jaunâtre) Quintilius (fils de Quintus) Herennius Rabirius (enragé) Horatius Roscius Julius (descendant de Iule fils d'Enée) Rutilius (roux éclatant) Scribonius (érudit) Ulpius Sempronius Valerius (fort) Servilius (fils de Servius) Velleius Sextius (fils de Sextus) Vettius Silius Vibius Sulpicius Virginius (vierge) Terentius Volusius Tullius 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Aristocratic Identities in the Roman Senate from the Social War to the Flavian Dynasty
    Aristocratic Identities in the Roman Senate From the Social War to the Flavian Dynasty By Jessica J. Stephens A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Greek and Roman History) in the University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor David Potter, chair Professor Bruce W. Frier Professor Richard Janko Professor Nicola Terrenato [Type text] [Type text] © Jessica J. Stephens 2016 Dedication To those of us who do not hesitate to take the long and winding road, who are stars in someone else’s sky, and who walk the hillside in the sweet summer sun. ii [Type text] [Type text] Acknowledgements I owe my deep gratitude to many people whose intellectual, emotional, and financial support made my journey possible. Without Dr. T., Eric, Jay, and Maryanne, my academic career would have never begun and I will forever be grateful for the opportunities they gave me. At Michigan, guidance in negotiating the administrative side of the PhD given by Kathleen and Michelle has been invaluable, and I have treasured the conversations I have had with them and Terre, Diana, and Molly about gardening and travelling. The network of gardeners at Project Grow has provided me with hundreds of hours of joy and a respite from the stress of the academy. I owe many thanks to my fellow graduate students, not only for attending the brown bags and Three Field Talks I gave that helped shape this project, but also for their astute feedback, wonderful camaraderie, and constant support over our many years together. Due particular recognition for reading chapters, lengthy discussions, office friendships, and hours of good company are the following: Michael McOsker, Karen Acton, Beth Platte, Trevor Kilgore, Patrick Parker, Anna Whittington, Gene Cassedy, Ryan Hughes, Ananda Burra, Tim Hart, Matt Naglak, Garrett Ryan, and Ellen Cole Lee.
    [Show full text]