DOCSLIB.ORG

0 2345067 843 9:;0<:/44= >?@34;0?0A7 :A BA= B34CA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
0 2345067 843 9:;0<:/44= >?@34;0?0A7 :A BA= B34CA KLM OMPQRSTU VW XVQYL XQZ[\ ]T\T^Y_` VW ab_TUQSYQ_M [\Z cV_M^Y_` ./0 2345067 843 9:;0<:/44= >?@34;0?0A7 :A BA= B34CA= DCEB 843 FCG7B:ABE<0 20B60 BA= H0;0<4@?0A7 I:AB< J0@437 cMR_Q[_`d efge q[P[\ r\YM_\[YTV\[S sVVPM_[YTV\ abM\U` tq r sau X`^YMv XUTM\UM sV\^QSY[\Y^ r\Uw hhi sLQV x[TL[Y^Q sV_PV_[YTV\ jk lm o ppm KLM OMPQRSTU VW XVQYL XQZ[\ ]T\T^Y_` VW ab_TUQSYQ_M [\Z cV_M^Y_` ./0 2345067 843 9:;0<:/44= >?@34;0?0A7 :A BA= B34CA= DCEB 843 FCG7B:ABE<0 20B60 BA= H0;0<4@?0A7 I:AB< J0@437 cMR_Q[_`d efge q[P[\ r\YM_\[YTV\[S sVVPM_[YTV\ abM\U` tq r sau X`^YMv XUTM\UM sV\^QSY[\Y^ r\Uw hhi sLQV x[TL[Y^Q sV_PV_[YTV\ jk lm o ppm This report is the final report for the ‘Project for Livelihood Improvement in and around Juba for Sustainable Peace and Development’ which was implemented between March 2009 and February 2012. During the project period, South Sudan achieved its independence in July 2011 and the new government has been established. Along the independence, administrative reforms at both central and state levels were carried out. As the counterpart agencies of the Project have also experienced administrative reforms, their organisational names and structures have been changed. The report uses both old and new names depending on the timing when a specific activity was conducted. PROJECT PROFILE Project Title Project for Livelihood Improvement in and around Juba for Sustainable Peace and Development (LIPS) Project site Juba County, Central Equatoria State Project Period March 2009 to February 2012 (36 months) Sector Community development, Agriculture extension, Capacity building Donor The Government of Japan/ Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA) Type of Assistance Technical cooperation (Grant) Responsible Agencies (Responsible Agency) (1) The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF/RSS) Although originally Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development was the responsible agency, it was consolidated into MAF in 2011). (Implementation Agency) (2) The Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development (MCRD/CES) At the beginning of LIPS, implementation agency was the State Ministry of Social Development, Gender and Religious Affairs (MSDGRA/CES). In 2010 the Directorate of Community Development that was a part of MSDGRA was separated and became MCRD/CES. (3) The Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry (MAF, CES) Project Objectives Basic conditions for extension of livelihood improvement models suitable for various communities in and around Juba are established. Overall Goal Livelihood improvement models suitable for various communities in and around Juba are widely utilized in Juba County. Project Components 1. (Manuals): Developing basic tools in extension of Livelihood Improvement Models. This includes (i) Development of Community Development tool kit and (ii) Development of Agricultural Technology Packages 2. (Human Resources Development): Capacity development of the government staff and community leaders in extension of Livelihood Improvement Models 3. (Institutional Development): Strengthening institutional and financial Capacity of MCRD and MSDGRA in effective operation of Livelihood Improvement Models 4. (Model Project): Implementation of Model project adapting Livelihood Improvement Models ii CURRENCY Currency Unit: February 2009 Sudan Pound (SDG) February 2012 South Sudan Pound (SSP) Exchange Rate: February 2009 US$ 1= SDG 2.28 (JICA rate) JPY 1 = SDG 0.0253 February 2012 US$ 1= SSP 3.00 JPY 1 = SSP 0.0391 MEASUREMENT UNIT 1 Feddan = 24 Kirat = 4,200 m² = 1.038 acres FISCAL YEAR Before the independence: 1st January to 31st December After the independence: 1st July to 30th June ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS AAHI Action Africa Help International AEO Agriculture Extension Officer ARDI Amadi Rural Development Institute CDO Community Development Officer CDP Community Development Plan CDM Community Development Manual CES Central Equatoria State CO Cooperative Officer C/P Counterpart (for LIPS project) CPA Comprehensive Peace Agreement FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FFS Farmer Field School FT Farmer Teacher GIZ Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (former GTZ) GOSS Government of Southern Sudan ha Hectare(s) IDP Internally Displaced Person JCC Joint Coordination Committee iii JICA Japan International Cooperation Agency LFDP Livelihood and Fishery Development Project LIPS Project for Livelihood Improvement in and around Juba for Sustainable Peace and Development LRA Lord's Resistance Army MAF Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry MARF Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries MCRD Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development M&E Monitoring & Evaluation MSDGRA Ministry of Social Development, Gender and Religious Affairs (CES) NGO Non-governmental Organization NPA Norwegian People’s Aid PDM Project Design Matrix PRA Participatory Rural Appraisal PY Project Year RD Record of Discussion RSS The Republic of South Sudan SIFSIA Sudan Institutional Capacity Programme: Food Security Information for Action SAFDP Support to Agriculture and Forestry Development Project SPCRP Sudan Productive Capacity Recovery Programme SSLDP Southern Sudan Livelihood Development Program SSC System Science Consultants Inc. SSCCSE Southern Sudan Centre for Census, Statistics and Evaluation TOR Terms of Reference TOT Training of Trainer UNDP United Nations Development Program UNHCR United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNICEF United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund UNOCHA United Nations, Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs WFP World Food Program (of the United Nations) WS Workshop iv PREFACE The 21-years civil war caused not only the destruction of the infrastructure but also the institutional collapse. While the war shattered the socio-economic base of the population, one of the most appalling impacts is evident in the loss of local capacity for self-reliance including traditional network of kinship, communal social support, collaboration which are the sources of sustainable community development. To recover the livelihood of the people, especially in rural area, the former Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development/RSS (it was consolidated into Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry in 2011) plays a vital role in enhancing cultural, social and economic empowerment of the people of South Sudan. In 2009, in response to a request from the Government of Southern Sudan, the Government of Japan decided to conduct the Project for Livelihood Improvement in and around Juba for Sustainable Peace and Development (called LIPS) and entrusted its implementation to the Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). JICA sent a team composed of experts from System Science Consultants Inc. and Chuo Kaihatsu Corporation led by Mr. Sachio Yamamoto to Juba from March 2009 to February 2012. This Report summarises the project activities and achievements during the said project period. The activities conducted through LIPS have been geared towards achieving the Goal that the President General Salva Kiir Mayardit stated as “taking town to rural area of the country”. The Project contributed to the development of the Government’s Rural Development Policy, manuals for community development and agricultural development, and capacity development of extension officers. These are very important tools to assist the Ministry to deliver sound rural development services and respond effectively to the challenges and opportunities ahead. The Project was implemented in close collaboration with its counterpart Ministry, the former Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development/RSS, the State Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development/CES, the State Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry/CES, and other development partners. We hope for continuous collaboration with our sincere partners toward the further betterment of the livelihood of the people in rural area of South Sudan and the enhancement of friendly relations between Japan and the Republic of South Sudan. Lastly, we would like to express our sincere appreciation to our stakeholders for their close cooperation. v EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “Taking town to rural area of the country” is a priority of new nation of the Republic of South Sudan. Without well-being in rural area, reconstruction of the country will never be realised. In 2009, former Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development (currently Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) initiated three years project “Project for Livelihood Improvement in and around Juba for Sustainable Peace and Development (called LIPS)” aiming to develop a mechanism of community development services. Between 2009 and 2012, the Project offered government staff and rural South Sudanese in Juba County integrated livelihood development opportunities through various types of training and implementation of model projects. This Report summarises project activities and achievements during said project period. PROJECT OUTLINE Overall Goal Livelihood of the community people will be widely improved through the adaptation of “Livelihood improvement models” in and out of Juba County. Project Objective Basic conditions for extension of livelihood improvement models suitable for various communities in and around Juba are established. Target Groups LIPS’s target groups are: i) senior officers of the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, the Republic of South Sudan (a former Ministry of Cooperatives and Rural Development/ GOSS), two types of extension officers, e.g. Community Development Officers (CDO) and Agricultural Extension Officers (AEO) in the Government of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan's Equatoria
    SPECIAL REPORT NO. 493 | APRIL 2021 UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF PEACE www.usip.org Conflict and Crisis in South Sudan’s Equatoria By Alan Boswell Contents Introduction ...................................3 Descent into War ..........................4 Key Actors and Interests ............ 9 Conclusion and Recommendations ...................... 16 Thomas Cirillo, leader of the Equatoria-based National Salvation Front militia, addresses the media in Rome on November 2, 2019. (Photo by Andrew Medichini/AP) Summary • In 2016, South Sudan’s war expand- Equatorians—a collection of diverse South Sudan’s transitional period. ed explosively into the country’s minority ethnic groups—are fighting • On a national level, conflict resolu- southern region, Equatoria, trig- for more autonomy, local or regional, tion should pursue shared sover- gering a major refugee crisis. Even and a remedy to what is perceived eignty among South Sudan’s con- after the 2018 peace deal, parts of as (primarily) Dinka hegemony. stituencies and regions, beyond Equatoria continue to be active hot • Equatorian elites lack the external power sharing among elites. To spots for national conflict. support to viably pursue their ob- resolve underlying grievances, the • The war in Equatoria does not fit jectives through violence. The gov- political process should be expand- neatly into the simplified narratives ernment in Juba, meanwhile, lacks ed to include consultations with of South Sudan’s war as a power the capacity and local legitimacy to local community leaders. The con- struggle for the center; nor will it be definitively stamp out the rebellion. stitutional reform process of South addressed by peacebuilding strate- Both sides should pursue a nego- Sudan’s current transitional period gies built off those precepts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Republic of South Sudan Request for an Extension of the Deadline For
    The Republic of South Sudan Request for an extension of the deadline for completing the destruction of Anti-personnel Mines in mined areas in accordance with Article 5, paragraph 1 of the convention on the Prohibition of the Use, Stockpiling, Production and Transfer of Antipersonnel Mines and on Their Destruction Submitted at the 18th Meeting of the State Parties Submitted to the Chair of the Committee on Article 5 Implementation Date 31 March 2020 Prepared for State Party: South Sudan Contact Person : Jurkuch Barach Jurkuch Position: Chairperson, NMAA Phone : (211)921651088 Email : [email protected] 1 | Page Contents Abbreviations 3 I. Executive Summary 4 II. Detailed Narrative 8 1 Introduction 8 2 Origin of the Article 5 implementation challenge 8 3 Nature and extent of progress made: Decisions and Recommendations of States Parties 9 4 Nature and extent of progress made: quantitative aspects 9 5 Complications and challenges 16 6 Nature and extent of progress made: qualitative aspects 18 7 Efforts undertaken to ensure the effective exclusion of civilians from mined areas 21 # Anti-Tank mines removed and destroyed 24 # Items of UXO removed and destroyed 24 8 Mine Accidents 25 9 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: quantitative aspects 27 10 The Disaggregation of Current Contamination 30 11 Nature and extent of the remaining Article 5 challenge: qualitative aspects 41 12 Circumstances that impeded compliance during previous extension period 43 12.1 Humanitarian, economic, social and environmental implications of the
    [Show full text]
  • EWARN Disease Surveillance Highlights World Health Organization 1 January to 9 August 2015 South Sudan NEW DISEASE OUTBREAKS, JANUARY to AUGUST 2015 Hepatitis E
    Since the beginning of 2015, measles outbreaks have been conrmed in Duk, Rubkona, and Renk Counties. In addition, there are three Hepatitis E Virus outbreaks that started last year in Mingkaman and Bentiu PoC. The HEV cases have declined in Mingkaman with only sporadic cases reported currently. However, the outbreak in Bentiu PoC has ared up in the recent weeks due to an upsurge in new arrivals into the PoC. A malaria upsurge was reported in Bentiu PoC starting mid June 2015. Since the beginning of 2015, cholera has been conrmed in three counties [Ikotos, Juba, and Bor]. EWARN Disease Surveillance Highlights World Health Organization 1 January to 9 August 2015 South Sudan NEW DISEASE OUTBREAKS, JANUARY TO AUGUST 2015 Hepatitis E Bentiu in Unity States IDP CONSULTATIONS Malaria Hepatitis E Virus (HEV) was conrmed 32,910 27 553,287 Cases Deaths Bentiu in Unity States Polio Virus type Since week 23 of 2015, malaria in Bentiu PoC surpassed ARI as the top cause of morbidity. Measles The current trends consistent with a malaria upsurge Cases 0 Deaths Cholera WHO has continued to support implementing partners to 9 Cases 0 Deaths Duk in Jongei States 1 Mayom in Unity States Conrmed case an 11-month-old female from Wangkei Payam, 130 1 provide essential healthcare services to displaced populations Three measles IgM positive cases; outbreak Mayom with no history of vaccination. In response three rounds Cases Deaths Bor in Jonglei States controlled after vaccination campaign by SMC of Short interval additional dose campaigns and two rounds of Most
    [Show full text]
  • Land Tenure Issues in Southern Sudan: Key Findings and Recommendations for Southern Sudan Land Policy
    LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY DECEMBER 2010 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by Tetra Tech ARD. LAND TENURE ISSUES IN SOUTHERN SUDAN: KEY FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR SOUTHERN SUDAN LAND POLICY THE RESULTS OF A RESEARCH COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE SUDAN PROPERTY RIGHTS PROGRAM AND THE NILE INSTITUTE OF STRATEGIC POLICY AND DEVELOPMENT STUDIES DECEMBER 2010 DISCLAIMER The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acknowledgements Page i Scoping Paper Section A Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla Jurisdiction of GOSS, State, County, and Customary Authorities over Land Section B Administration, Planning, and Allocation: Juba County, Central Equatoria State Lomoro Robert Bullen Land Tenure and Property Rights in Southern Sudan: A Case Study of Section C Informal Settlements in Juba Gabriella McMichael Customary Authority and Traditional Authority in Southern Sudan: A Case Study Section D of Juba County Wani Mathias Jumi Conflict Over Resources Among Rural Communities in Southern Sudan Section E Andrew Athiba Synthesis Paper Section F Sibrino Barnaba Forojalla and Kennedy Crispo Galla ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The USAID Sudan Property Rights Program has supported the Southern Sudan Land Commission in its efforts to undertake consultation and research on land tenure and property rights issues; the findings of these initiatives were used to draft a land policy that is meant to be both legitimate and relevant to the needs of Southern Sudanese citizens and legal rights-holders.
    [Show full text]
  • South Sudan - Crisis Fact Sheet #4, Fiscal Year (Fy) 2019 March 8, 2019
    SOUTH SUDAN - CRISIS FACT SHEET #4, FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2019 MARCH 8, 2019 NUMBERS AT USAID/OFDA1 FUNDING HIGHLIGHTS A GLANCE BY SECTOR IN FY 2018 Insecurity in Yei results in unknown number of civilian deaths, prevents 15,000 5% 7% 20% people from receiving aid 7.1 million 7% Estimated People in South Health actors continue EVD awareness Sudan Requiring Humanitarian 10% and screening activities Assistance 19% 2019 Humanitarian Response Plan – WFP conducts first road delivery to 15% December 2018 central Unity 17% Logistics Support & Relief Commodities (20%) Water, Sanitation & Hygiene (19%) HUMANITARIAN FUNDING Health (17%) 6.5 million FOR THE SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE Nutrition (15%) Estimated People in Need of Protection (10%) Food Assistance in South Sudan Agriculture & Food Security (7%) USAID/OFDA $135,187,409 IPC Technical Working Group – Humanitarian Coordination & Info Management (7%) February 2019 Shelter & Settlements (5%) USAID/FFP $398,226,647 3 State/PRM $91,553,826 1.9 million USAID/FFP2 FUNDING $624,967,8824 Estimated IDPs in BY MODALITY IN FY 2018 1% TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE South Sudan SOUTH SUDAN CRISIS IN FY 2018 UN – January 31, 2019 84% 9% 5% U.S. In-Kind Food Aid (84%) 1% $3,756,094,855 Local & Regional Food Procurement (9%) TOTAL USG HUMANITARIAN FUNDING FOR THE Complementary Services (5%) SOUTH SUDAN RESPONSE IN FY 2014–2018, Cash Transfers for Food (1%) INCLUDING FUNDING FOR SOUTH SUDANESE 191,238 Food Vouchers (1%) REFUGEES IN NEIGHBORING COUNTRIES Estimated Individuals Seeking Refuge at UNMISS Bases UNMISS – March 4, 2019 KEY DEVELOPMENTS Ongoing violence between Government of the Republic of South Sudan (GoRSS) and opposition forces near Central Equatoria State’s Yei area has displaced an estimated 2.3 million 7,400 people to Yei town since December and is preventing relief agencies from reaching Estimated Refugees and Asylum more than 15,000 additional people seeking safety outside of Yei, the UN reports.
    [Show full text]
  • C the Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan
    C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors would like to express their gratitude to the following persons (from State Ministries of Livestock and Fishery Industries and FAO South Sudan Office) for collecting field data from the sample counties in nine of the ten States of South Sudan: Angelo Kom Agoth; Makuak Chol; Andrea Adup Algoc; Isaac Malak Mading; Tongu James Mark; Sebit Taroyalla Moris; Isaac Odiho; James Chatt Moa; Samuel Ajiing Uguak; Samuel Dook; Rogina Acwil; Raja Awad; Simon Mayar; Deu Lueth Ader; Mayok Dau Wal and John Memur. The authors also extend their special thanks to Erminio Sacco, Chief Technical Advisor and Dr Abdal Monium Osman, Senior Programme Officer, at FAO South Sudan for initiating this study and providing the necessary support during the preparatory and field deployment phases. DISCLAIMER FAO South Sudan mobilized a team of independent consultants to conduct this study. The views and opinions expressed in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of FAO. COMPOSITION OF STUDY TEAM Yacob Aklilu Gebreyes (Team Leader) Gezu Bekele Lemma Luka Biong Deng Shaif Abdullahi i C The Impact of Conflict on the Livestock Sector in South Sudan TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………...I ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................................................................................... VI NOTES ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Internews in South Sudan Map Updated May 2020
    INTERNEWS IN SOUTH SUDAN MAP UPDATED MAY 2020 SUDAN SUDAN UPPER NILE SUDAN Jamjang 11 3 Gendrassa Abyei 1 2 UNITY 34 Malakal 40 Bentiu 0 km 100 km Turalei 7 SUDAN 4 5 Nasir WESTERN Aweil BAHR EL NORTHERN GHAZAL BAHR EL 32 GHAZAL Kwajok WARRAP D.R. 41 Wau ETHIOPIA CONGO 42 Leer Pochala 36 JONGLEI 37 38 Rumbek LAKES 8 9 10 6 Bor South Awerial Sudan WESTERN Mundri EASTERN EQUATORIA 35 EQUATORIA 12 18 24 30 13 19 25 Ilemi- Kapoeta Dreieck Yambio Juba 14 20 26 15 21 27 31 TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS 43 16 22 28 Radio Station 17 23 29 Torit Repeaters CENTRAL KENYA Media Training Institution EQUATORIA Magwi DEMOCRATIC 33 Advocacy Organization REPUBLIC OF Media Outlet THE CONGO Community-Based Organization UGANDA Associate Partner Type Location Partner Reach (if applicable) Partnership Active 1 Radio Station Abyei, Agok Abyei FM 60 km radius 2015 - Present 3 Radio Station Jamjang, Unity Jamjang FM 60 km radius 2016 - Pesent 4 Radio Station Aweil, Northern Bahr el Ghazal Akol Yam 91.0FM 150 km radius 2017 - Present 6 Radio Station Awerial, Lakes Mingkaman 100FM 150 km radius 2014 - Present 7 Radio Station Bentiu, Unity Kondial FM 30 km radius 2018 - Present 8 Radio Station Bor, Jonglei Radio Jonglei 50 km radius 2018 11 Radio Station Gendrassa, Upper Nile Radio Salam 30 km radius 2019 - Present 19 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Radio Bakhita 100 km radius 2015-2016 23 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Advance Youth Radio 50 km radius 2019 - Present 26 Radio Station Juba, Central Equatoria Eye Radio 60 km radius 2014 - Present 28 Radio Station
    [Show full text]
  • Tragedy, Ritual, and Power in Nilotic Regicide
    Tragedy, Ritual and Power in Nilotic Regicide: The regicidal dramas of the Eastern Nilotes of Sudan in Comparative Perspective1 Simon Simonse Introduction Regicide as an aspect of early kingship is a central issue in the anthropological debate on the origin of the state and the symbolism of kingship. By a historical coincidence the kingship of the Nilotic Shilluk has played a key role in this debate which was dominated by the ideas of James Frazer, as set out in the first (The Magic Art and the Evolution of Kings), the third (The Dying God) and the sixth part (The Scapegoat) of The Golden Bough (1913). The fact that the Shilluk king was killed before he could die a natural death was crucial to Frazer’s interpretation of early kingship. Frazer equated the king with a dying god who though his death regenerates the forces of nature. This ‘divine kingship’ was an evolutionary step forward compared to ‘magical kingship’ where the power of the king is legitimated by his claim to control the natural processes on which human communities depend. Frazer’s interpretation of kingship was opposed by a post-war generation of anthropologists who were interested in the empirical study of kingship as a political system and who treated the ritual and symbolic aspects of kingship as a secondary dimension of kingship more difficult to penetrate by the methodology of structural-functional analysis. The reality of the practice of regicide that was so central to Frazer’s interpretations of kingship was put in doubt (Evans-Pritchard, 1948). The ongoing practice by mostly Eastern Nilotic communities of killing Rainmakers when they failed to make rain – noted by Frazer in The Golden Bough (1913, Part 1, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 17 As at 23:59 Hours, 01 June 2014
    Republic of South Sudan Cholera in South Sudan Situation Report # 17 as at 23:59 Hours, 01 June 2014 Background On 29 April 2014, a suspected case of cholera was reported from the MSF clinic at UN House/Juba III Protection of Civilian (PoC) camp. On 28 April 2014, he visited relatives in Gudele II where he developed severe diarrhea and vomiting. One of the contacts in the household had developed acute watery diarrhea on the 24 April 2014. Stool samples collected from his four household contacts were all laboratory confirmed. On 15 May 2014, the Ministry of Health declared an outbreak of cholera in Juba. Since then, several suspected cases have been recorded and laboratory confirmed from different suburbs in Juba. A retrospective record review at the emergency medical ward of Juba Teaching Hospital (JTH) revealed seven suspected cholera cases including one death, with the first case admitted on 23 April 2014. Situation Update The table below summarizes the number of suspected and confirmed cases reported in Juba. Table 1 Summary of cholera cases, 23 April - 01 June 2014 Summary of cases JTH Gurei Tongping UN Gumbo Kajo- Other Total CTC CTC CTC House ORP Keji Civil sites (Juba III) Hosp Total new admisions today 28 3 0 1 4 0 0 36 Readmissions 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 Total new discharges today 23 11 0 0 0 0 0 34 Total new deaths today 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total number of cases currently 82 10 0 0 4 0 0 96 admitted Leave Against Medical Advice 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (LAMA) Total facility deaths since the 15 0 0 0 0 0 1 16 onset of the outbreak Community deaths since the 0 0 0 0 3 0 8 11 onset of the outbreak Cumulative deaths since the onset 15 0 0 0 3 0 9 27 of the outbreaks Cumulative cases discharged 771 138 4 11 12 1 1 938 Cumulative cases 925 148 4 14 16 1 16 1,124 *Includes cases detected in private health facilities and at community level .
    [Show full text]
  • Unity Jonglei Upper Nile Lakes Central Equatoria Rumbek Juba
    Jonglei, Unity and Upper Ni3l0e° Eare identified as Conflict Affected States. 32° E 34° E Khartoum All locations within these 3 states consider under "Free-to-Use" except refugee camps (Cost Recovery) in Unity and Upper Nile Dilling Gerger Sudan 12° N Alakafaria 12° N Upper Dalami Rashad Nile Renk Ab yei Unity El Roseires Avg. Payload: Ed DamEthaiozpiian 5.2 MT South Sudan Jonglei Wadakona CAR Umm Heitan Abu Jibaiha Lagawa Kenya DRC Heiban Kadugli (North) Uganda Sudan Kadugli (South) Umm Dorain Kologi Wirni Kurmuk Paloich Melut Avg. Payload: Athidway 5.2 MT Yida Jemaam Kaya Asosa Higlig Ajuong Pariang Thok Yusuf Doro 10° N Batil Bunj/Maban 10° N Oriny Kodok Gendrassa Rom Avg. Payload: Lul 5.2 MT Abyei Akoka Bambesi Wau Nyingaro Shaluk Unity Malakal Tonga Avg. Payload: 5.2 MT Upper Nile Abiemnhom Juaibor New Kaldak Avg. Payload: Rubkona Pigi Fangak Baliet 5.2 MT Kuernyang Kurwai Kamel Mayom Mayom Khorfulus Wun-Gak Avg. Payload: Dajo Bentiu Atar 1.3 MT Guit Paguer Old Abwong Fangak Riang Mankien Wang-Kay Kadet Wunrok Chuil Kiech Mathiang Nhialdiu Kon Gidami Wicok Ngop Kuach Juong Boaw Thow Toic Kuacdeng Mading Gaireng Turkej Pagil Gum Ulang Wathjak NassAvegr. Payload: Koch Menime Maiwut Pultruk Nyangore 5.2 MT Kandak Mandeng Mir Mir Haat Pagak Pading Nyambor Lankien Jikmir Mogok Makak Pagak Jiech Avg. Payload: Jikou Dablual 5.2 MT Metar Leer Malwal-Gakhoth Nyenyang Kowerneng Wai Gorway Gambela Nyanepol Mayendit Adok Motot Mwot Tot Waat Itang Ayod Avg. Payload: Pathai Walgak Pagiel Pieri Wanding 5.2 MT Torwar Kotdalok 8° N Madol Yuai Ethiopia 8° N Warrap Abobo Duk Akobo Shentewa Nyal Ayueldit Fadiat Pajut Avg.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents
    Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. 7 Background of the Landmine Impact Survey .......................................................................................... 16 Survey Results and Findings Scope of the Landmine Problem............................................................................................................. 21 Analysis of Economic Blockage Impacts................................................................................................. 41 Retrofit Results ....................................................................................................................................... 43 Past Mine Action .................................................................................................................................... 45 Profiles by State Blue Nile ................................................................................................................................................ 51 Central Equatoria................................................................................................................................... 57 Eastern Equatoria................................................................................................................................... 65 Gadaref.................................................................................................................................................. 71 Jonglei
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Rinderpest Control in Southern Sudan 1989-2000
    Review of Rinderpest Control in Southern Sudan 1989-2000 Prepared for the Community-based Animal Health and Epidemiology (CAPE) Unit of the Pan African Programme for the Control of Epizootics (PACE) Bryony Jones March 2001 Acknowledgements The information contained in this document has been collected over the years by southern Sudanese animal health workers, UNICEF/OLS Livestock Project staff, Tufts University consultants, and the staff of NGOs that have supported community-based animal health projects in southern Sudan (ACROSS, ACORD, ADRA, DOT, GAA, NPA, Oxfam-GB, Oxfam-Quebec, SC-UK, VETAID, VSF-B, VSF-CH, VSF-G, Vetwork Services Trust, World Relief). The individuals involved are too numerous to name, but their hard work and contribution of information is gratefully acknowledged. The data from the early years of the OLS Livestock Programme (1993 to 1996) was collated by Tim Leyland, formerly UNICEF/OLS Livestock Project Officer. Disease outbreak information from 1998 to date has been collated by Dr Gachengo Matindi, FAO/OLS Livestock Officer (formerly UNICEF/OLS Livestock Officer). Rinderpest serology and virus testing has mainly been carried out by National Veterinary Research Centre, Muguga, Nairobi. Any errors or omissions in this review are the fault of the author. If any reader has additional information to correct an error or omission the author would be grateful to receive this information. For further information contact: CAPE Unit PACE Programme OAU/IBAR PO Box 30786 Nairobi Tel: Nairobi 226447 Fax: Nairobi 226565 E mail: [email protected] Or the author: Bryony Jones PO Box 13434 Nairobi Kenya Tel: Nairobi 580799 E mail: [email protected] 2 CONTENTS Page 1.
    [Show full text]