By CA S. D Mookerjea At ICAI course of MBF On 26th May 2012  It is an investment fund that aggressively manages its portfolio  It employs investment techniques like : -- Leveraged positions -- Long & positions -- Derivative positions  The funds are largely US based & operate globally  The objective is to generate high returns while it actually started of as an instrument of hedging ‘Risks’  It is operates as private investment partnership that are only open to limited number of investors  The minimum investment amount is large & the investments are largely illiquid  As these funds cater to sophisticated investors they are largely unregulated  In US the investors are accredited - $ 1 million net worth , deep investment knowledge & high annual income---   Long/short -- Positive exposure without leverage (70% long and 30% short ) -- Positive exposure with leverage ( 80% long and 40 % short )  Market neutral -- (50% long and 50% short) -- With beta

 The play can be in regions , industry , sectors or specific market cap stocks  -- Investing globally on currency , commodities futures & options , forward & other derivative instruments -- Funds place directional bets on prices of underlying assets & are highly leveraged -- Also choose the diversity of instruments and regions to make money  --Relative value --Here manager is expected to buy securities/bonds which is supposed to appreciate & reverse for securities/bonds supposed to depreciate -- Related securities could be a) stocks & bonds of same company  b) stocks of different company but same sector c) stocks of same sector but different territories etc -- Convertible value-Trader take position on convertible bond and stock of the same company -- Distressed value-Hedge funds may do loan & restructuring and take position on BoD for turnaround  , is the main advisor of Quantum group of funds  Set up as a privately owned hedge fund in Netherlands and in Cayman Islands , it is a group which largely deals in currency and commodities  along with Jim Rogers began this hedge fund in early 1970s  Shareholders of the fund were never publicly disclosed although it is believed that Rothschild family & some other wealthy European groups invested $6million in the beginning.  George Soros propounded the Theory of Reflexivity  The Theory debunks the classical economic theory of independent demand & supply curve & price  It states that the not only demand determines the price but at a point price determines the demand  It is a circular relationship of cause & effect  There is no equilibrium but a series of changes in demand & supply  Example : Banks lent to real estate when prices were rising and when pricing forces became unsustainable, the banks cut the lending—(the US model)  Many hedge funds has now accepted this theory as trading cornerstone  Armed with the theory of reflexivity , Soros began shorting currencies in a big way  Soros began tracking countries with bulging budget deficits like USA and began shorting dollars at ‘reflexivity points’  He used quantitative tools like trend lines and algorithim  But more than that he deeply studied ‘easy money policy’, its consequent debt creation and the demand bubble that was forming  By late 1980s he was virtually betting $ 1 billion a day and had spread his quantum funds to all European currencies.  The fluctuating interest rates enabled him to take long/short positions in the international bond market  The annual earning of the fund was running at 40 % with variety of assets including commodities totaling to nearly 7 billion dollars  And then in 1992, Soros ‘broke the ’ through his Quantum hedge fund  In 1987, Common Market had an exchange mechanism called European Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) & was colloquially known as ‘Snake’ to which Britain became member  In 1992 after German reunification, Soros observed that injection of funds in East Germany pushed up interest rates to an extent that the recession bound Pound began to loose value  On Sept 16 1992 , Quantum Fund took a $ 7 million short position on Pound-sterling.  Bank of England tried to defend the pound by buying but failed  The Central ERM rate was 2.95 to a mark but by the end of the day had sunk to 2.25 & was going down further  Under pressure BoE exited ‘Snake’ loosing deposits and financial credibility.  Quantum Fund had also shorted Lira but had gone long on mark & French Franc  At the end of it Quantum Fund collected a profit of $ 2 Billion  In early 1990s,John Meriwether & some of his brilliant collegues in Saloman Brothers completed a model that tended to predict bond spread aberrations & correction probability  It actually simplified the operation of a small but complicated portion of the bond market  In 1994 Meriwether and his friends left the company & formed LCTM with (amazingly) $ 1.2 Billion start up funds  Scholes & Merlon of merlon- Balck-scholes fame were a noble prize winners ( Oct 97) and partners Where: 2 d1 = [ln(S0/X) + (r - d + σ /2)T]/ σ √T And:

d2 = d1 - σ √T Black and Scholes reasoned that the option’s value depended on Five variables: The current market price of the Stock (S), the agreed future price at which the option could be exercised (X), the expiration date of the option (T), the risk-free rate of return in the economy as a whole (r) and the crucial variable - the expected annual volatility of the stock, that is, ther likely fluctuation s of its price between the time of purchase and the expiration date (σ - the Greek letter sigma). With wonderful mathematical wizardry, Black & Scholes reduced the price of the option to -dT -rT C0 = Se N(d1) - Xe N(d2)  It was computer based model that fed on arbitrage opportunities in the Bond Market  Central strategy was convergence trade where the securities were incorrectly priced in relation to one another  LTCM would take long position on under priced security and short position on overpriced ones  LTCM would make money when the bonds ,over a time , came to its fair value  Factors involved were economic strength, fiscal deficit, Central bank policies , interest rates etc  It focused on tiny differences & theatre of operation was International Bond Market , US Bonds , Emerging markets etc  The results in the initial years were spectacular  In 1995 the return was 29% , in 1996 59% & in 1997 it still maintained dizzying height of 57 %  The Capital had tripled to $ 3.5 billion & the company had reserves of liquid cash  LCTM was leveraging at 1:30 ratio  Investors & lenders were happy but none knew the finance/risk structure  A Hedge fund of 100 employees was ahead of large global corporations  ‘Excess profit breeds excess competition’  The super profits of LTCM brought other large funds in the arena  It took a while for others to figure out the operations but once they did, the field got crowded and LTCM margins were under pressure  LTCM took the fatal step to branch out in other areas of commodities , currencies etc  But the inexperience and high leveraging coupled with 1998 crash of Russian roubles made LTCM incurr losses to push it into bankrupcy  Limitations of excessive leverage-Holding long term becomes difficult  Importance of Risk Management : -- Managers focused on theoretical model & not enough on liquidity risk , gap risk and stress-testing -- The possibility of crisis & flight to liquidity was ignored -- The theory of correlation of long & short position should have been stress tested. -- Exposure to multiple areas with inadequate understanding is a fundamental flaw  Lack of Supervision  XYZ Commodities Ltd is a hedge fund dealing in derivatives of oil , copper and iron ore.  It specialized inter-country arbitrage but was getting constrained by US policy on Iran  Additionally the Fund worked with consultants who did not understand the traders language  Timing was of essence as algorithm strategies needed to be developed urgently  Hired IBM to quickly create an algo platform  Algo trading strategies were put into platform in record time  Created back testing tools to validate the strategies  Created visual tools to monitor real time performance  Established bench marking of bonus performance