DOCSLIB.ORG

Vol 16 No 6 Lincoln Building

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vol 16 No 6 Lincoln Building PRESERVATIONAND CONSERVATIONASSOCIATION Volume 16 November-December, 1996 Number 6 Focus on: Lincoln Building Located at the southwest comer of East Main and Market streets in downtown Champaign, the Lincoln Building was nominated to the National Register of Historic Places for Architecture as a local- ly significant example of the Commercial Style. With its tripartite division of base, shaft, and capital; fixed storefront sash and second story display sash, each with transoms; and regularly spaced double- hung upper story windows, the Lincoln Building represents a state-of-the-art store/ office building for early twentieth century Champaign. Five stories tall and fireproof in construction, the mottled brown brick building with Oassical North and east elevations of the Lincoln Building, 44 East Main Street, Champaign. (Alice Revival inspired brown terra cotta trim Novak, 1996) and a copper cornice includes fine materials and solid construction, an ap- the style of these evolving late nineteenth Characteristics of the Commercial Style propriately handsome building built by and turn of the century buildings may be include a building height of five to six- one of Champaign's most prominent open to debate, but typically, some teen stories; steel skeleton construction families. The interior of the Linmln Build- variety of these buildings get lumped into with masonry wall surfaces; minimal, if ing features an extensive use of marble, the term "Commercial Style." Marcus any, projections from the facade plane; terrazzo, and wood trim in its office cor- Whiffen credits the first use of the term in flat roofs; level parapets or mrnices; 1/1 ridors of intact suites with single light print to an anonymous editor of four double-hung sash; prismatic transoms; doors and three-light interior corridor volumes of IndustriJlIChicago,published and minimal applied ornament. By far, transoms. Today, the building's architec- in 1891. Cites Whiffen, the greatest element of the style is win- ture and impressive high degree of in- The CommercialStyle is.thetitle suggested dows, mmprising much of Commercial tegrity contribute to this building's mn- by thegreat officeand mercantilebuildings Style buildings' main facades. The result tinu~ landmark presence in downtown nowfound here. The requirements ofcom- of the total area of glass exceeding that of Champaign. The period of significance is merceand the business principles of reales- the brick (or other structural or facing 1916, representing the building's date of tate owners calledthis style into life. Light, material) is a skeletal appearance. H any completion. The building was designed space,air and strength were demandedby ornamentation is used on the building, it by prominent local architect HR Temple, such requirements and principles as thefirst is clearly ancillary to the fenestration. who had an office in the Lincoln Building objectsand exterior ornamentation as the Wmdows of this style are rectangular, upon its opening. second. very large, and variously divided; the The second principle of the aforemen- fenestration pattern, whether of single or Commercial Style tioned-exterior ornamentation-opens grouped windows, is quite regular. One companion stylistic comparisons: Rich- popular form of grouped window used Technical advances such as steel skeleton ardsonian Romanesque, Sullivanesque, in the Commercial Style became known construction, elevators, electric lights, and and even Classical Revival. The term as the Chicago window-a broad central telephones contributed to the innovation "Chicago Style" also mmes into con- 'fixed sash flanked by narrow double- of the "skyscraper," which, at the turn of sideration. Whiffen notes the tendency hung sash. In still other examples, win- the century, was any building five stories toward crediting Chicago as the birth- dows are located in semi-hexagonal bays or taller. With the steel skeleton support- place of the Commercial Style, as well as which extend the entire height of the ing the building, walls were new territory the city in which the style reached its ul- building (above the first or second for design changes, chiefly in a greatly in- timate development. He credits the stories). Typically, facades are terminated creased percentage of wall space oc- period of the Commercial Style from 1875 in mrnices, varying from plain to highly cupied by windows. What, exactly, to call through 1915. demrative treatments. Built in 1915-16, the Lincoln Building in on the Lincoln Building is not surprising. Harry Roberts Temple was a 1900 Champaign is a relatively late example of The Oassical Revival style was especially graduate of the architecture program at the Commercial Style. By the 188Os,the popular for public buildings from the the University of Illinois at Urbana-cham~ style was already popular in New York, turn of the century to the mid-twentieth paign. Nelson Strong Spencer, a native of Chicago, and other large Eastern and century, havirig gained prominence Dixon, lllinois, was an 1882 graduate of Midwestern cities. Despite William Le- through its use at the 1893 World's the same program. Spencer Was an in- Baron Jenney's early examples of build- Columbian Exposition in Chicago and the structor in the Department of Architec- ings in the style (First Leiter Building, 1901 Pan-American Exhibition in San ture from 1880-83; from 1898-1902,he 1879 and the Home Insurance Building, Francisco. The exposition planners of the was Superintendent of Buildings and 1884-85, both in Chicago), some of the Chicago fair mandated a classical theme, Grounds at the University. (Spencer more notable Commercial Style buildings with many of the eta's noted architects would appear to have been a good ac- of the style's earliest period were designing dramatic colonnaded buildings quaintance of Professor Nathan Oifford designed by Adler and Sullivan. Included arranged around a central court. The Ricker, as Spencer's first child was named are the Troescher Building (the Chicago widely attended exposition inspired ar- Clifford Ricker Spencer.) The Spencer and Joint Board Building), 1884; the Wirt Dex- chitectural fashion around the country. Temple partnership lasted from 1908 to ter Building, 1887; and, at the end of that Located approximately 120 miles south 1914, according to city directories. The period, the Wainwright Building in St. of Chicago, Champaign-Urbana could firm's office was first at 55 North Neil Louis, designed in 1890, and exhibiting hardly be considered an architectural Street, then later moved to 72-1/2 North the Sullivanesque treatment. mecca, but the architectural trends which Neil Street, downtown Champaign loca- In the 1890s, the Chicago basedar- had inspired the nation were seen here as tions. Among the numerous local designs chitectural firm of Holabird and Roche be- well. The second story display windows by the Spencer and Temple firm are the came the most'successful firm specializ- of the Lincoln Building are not on any First Baptist Church, 1899, Champaign; ing in commercial work in the city. Their other puildings in Champaign-Urbana. the Masonic Temple, 1912, Urbana; and Tacoma Building, 1887-89 represented This element is at least reminiscent of (if the Mahomet Graded School, 1904. their first attempt at the Commercial not directly inspired by) the Adler and Temple worked with James White, the Style; demolished in 1929, that building Sullivan designed Guaranty (Prudential) University of lllinois's architect, on the was in the vertical bay mode of the style. Building in Buffalo, New York, 1895, and design of the University/s Agriculture En- Later examples of the firm's use of the the CarSon, Pirie, Scott and Company gineering Building at 1208 West Peabody. style, including the Marquette Building of Store, Chieago, 1899. The idea oEbase, The Lincoln Building represents one of, if 1893, discontinued that mode, uSing in- shaft, and capital tripartite vertical not the first, designs by Temple on his stead, broad rectangular windows extend- divisions of the building was a popular own. Spencer left for Chicago where he ing the full width of structural bays. Con- trend attributed to Sullivan. While some- had an office on Van Buren Street. Temple temporaneously, Sullivan was employing timE!sarchitectural stylistic categories resided at 909 West Church Street in facades with piers and spandrels in the may be subjective, few, if any, Cham- Champaign, a stucco, English Revival same plane, with long horizontal lines at paign-Urbana buildings would be clas- house; whether he designed the house is the siIllevels being unbroken. Examples sified as Commercial Style. not known. He eventually left Cham- are the Meyer Building, 1893, and the Car- Champaign-Urbana's architectural paign for the Quad Cities. Temple died in son, Pirie, Scott and Company Store, preferences favored the Oassical Revival Italy in 1923. 1899, both in Chicago. style or at least classical architectural ele- The building resume of the Lincoln The Lincoln Building in Champaign ments. The Inman Hotel, the First Nation- Building's contractors-the English fits well within the defining elements of al Bank Building, and the Masonic Brothers-reads as a "Who's Who" of sig- the Commercial Style. Five stories in Temple, all within a few blocks of each nificant buildings in Champaign and Ur- height, the Lincoln Building is con- other, are Classical Revival in influence or bana, and particularly at the University structed of structural steel encased in style, although varying considerably in of lllinois campus. In addition to the lin- fireproof material with the exterior waIls degree of detail. The style was also ap- coln Building, among the credits of the clad in mottled brown brick with brown parently favored by HR. Temple, as, in English Brothers are the Auditorium terra cotta trim. The facades are flat with addition to the Lincoln Building, Temple Building, LincoJ,nHall, the Ceramics the exception of a light well on the east. (then with Spencer and Temple) designed Building, the Administration Building, The full entablature is nearly flat or level, the Inma~ Hotel and the Masonic Temple the Wesley Foundation, the Stadium, the with the exception of shields which in Urbana.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vol 23 No 6 National Register of Historic Places
    PRESERVATION A,ND CONSERVATION ASSOCIATION VOLUME 23 NOVEMBER-DECEMBEFt2003 NUMBER6 National Register of Historic Places The National Register of Historic Places is the official list of our coun- try's cultural resources worth preserv- ing. It was authorized by Congress in 1966 with the National Historic Pres- ervation Act. This act directed the Secretary of the Intenor to compile an official list of cultural resources in the United States worth preserving, including "sites, buildings, objects, districts, and structures significant in American history, architecture, arch- aeology and culture" and to include those which are significant to the The Virginia Theatre, 203 w: Park, Champaign, was listed on the National Register of Historic nation, states, or local communities. Places on November 28, 2003. To date, forty-six individual buildings and one district in Champaign County are on the National Register. Four listed buildings have been demolished. After the Act was passed, the Secre- Prior to 1966~Americans interested in vents an owner from changing his tary of the Interior chose to decentral- the physical evidences of their history, property. This is not true. Theieis no ize the responsibilities given him by $hether at the local, state or national restriction in this law that prevents writing to each of the governors of the levels, had no legal voice in how their property owners from doing what respective states and territories, and tax dollars were spent on projects they want with their own property, asking them to appoint an individual which would affect the existing built with their own money. There is also within the state government who environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Commercial-Industrial and Tax - Exempt Users As of 7/10/2018
    Large Commercial-Industrial and Tax - Exempt Users as of 7/10/2018 User Account User Charge Facility Name Address City Zip Number Classification 20600 208 South LaSalle LCIU 208 S LaSalle Street Chicago 60604 27686 300 West Adams Management, LLC LCIU 300 W Adams Street Chicago 60606 27533 5 Rabbit Brewery LCIU 6398 W 74th Street Bedford Park 60638 27902 9W Halo OpCo L.P. LCIU 920 S Campbell Avenue Chicago 60612 11375 A T A Finishing Corp LCIU 8225 Kimball Avenue Skokie 60076 10002 Aallied Die Casting Co. of Illinois LCIU 3021 Cullerton Drive Franklin Park 60131 26752 Abba Father Christian Center TXE 2056 N Tripp Avenue Chicago 60639 26197 Abbott Molecular, Inc. LCIU 1300 E Touhy Avenue Des Plaines 60018 24781 Able Electropolishing Company LCIU 2001 S Kilbourn Avenue Chicago 60623 26702 Abounding in Christ Love Ministries, Inc. TXE 14620 Lincoln Avenue Dolton 60419 16259 Abounding Life COGIC TXE 14615 Mozart Avenue Posen 60469 25290 Above & Beyond Black Oxide Inc LCIU 1027-29 N 27th Avenue Melrose Park 60160 18063 Abundant Life MB Church TXE 2306 W 69th Street Chicago 60636 16270 Acacia Park Evangelical Lutheran Church TXE 4307 N Oriole Avenue Norridge 60634 13583 Accent Metal Finishing Co. LCIU 9331 W Byron Street Schiller Park 60176 26289 Access Living TXE 115 W Chicago Avenue Chicago 60610 11340 Accurate Anodizing LCIU 3130 S Austin Blvd Cicero 60804 11166 Ace Anodizing & Impregnating Inc LCIU 4161 Butterfield Road Hillside 60162 27678 Acme Finishing Company, LLC LCIU 1595 E Oakton Street Elk Grove Village 60007 18100 Addison Street
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Historic and Natural Resources Within the I&M Canal
    Designated historic and natural resources within the I&M Canal National Heritage Corridor Federal Designations National Cemeteries • Abraham Lincoln National Cemetery National Heritage Areas • Abraham Lincoln National Heritage Area National Historic Landmarks • Adler Planetarium (Chicago, Cook County) • Auditorium Building (Chicago, Cook County) • Carson, Pirie, Scott, and Company Store (Chicago, Cook County) • Chicago Board of Trade Building (LaSalle Street, Chicago, Cook County) • Depriest, Oscar Stanton, House (Chicago, Cook County) • Du Sable, Jean Baptiste Point, Homesite (Chicago, Cook County) • Glessner, John H., House (Chicago, Cook County) • Hegeler-Carus Mansion (LaSalle, LaSalle County) • Hull House (Chicago, Cook County) • Illinois & Michigan Canal Locks and Towpath (Will County) • Leiter II Building (Chicago, Cook County) • Marquette Building (Chicago, Cook County) • Marshall Field Company Store (Chicago, Cook County) • Mazon Creek Fossil Beds (Grundy County) • Old Kaskaskia Village (LaSalle County) • Old Stone Gate, Chicago Union Stockyards (Chicago, Cook County) • Orchestra Hall (Chicago, Cook County) • Pullman Historic District (Chicago, Cook County) • Reliance Building, (Chicago, Cook County) • Rookery Building (Chicago, Cook County) • Shedd Aquarium (Chicago, Cook County) • South Dearborn Street-Printing House Row North (Chicago, Cook County) • S. R. Crown Hall (Chicago, Cook County) • Starved Rock (LaSalle County) • Wells-Barnettm Ida B., House (Chicago, Cook County) • Williams, Daniel Hale, House (Chicago, Cook County) National Register of Historic Places Cook County • Abraham Groesbeck House, 1304 W. Washington Blvd. (Chicago) • Adler Planetarium, 1300 S. Lake Shore Dr., (Chicago) • American Book Company Building, 320-334 E. Cermak Road (Chicago) • A. M. Rothschild & Company Store, 333 S. State St. (Chicago) • Armour Square, Bounded by W 33rd St., W 34th Place, S. Wells Ave. and S.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Expires 5/31/2012) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional certification comments, entries, and narrative items on continuation sheets if needed (NPS Form 10-900a). 1. Name of Property historic name West Loop - LaSalle Street Historic District other names/site number 2. Location Roughly bounded by Wacker Drive, Wells Street, Van Buren Street street & number and Clark Street N/A not for publication N/A city or town Chicago vicinity state Illinois code IL county Cook code 031 zip code 60601-60604 60606, 60610 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination _ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property _ meets _ does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Signature of certifying official/Title Date State or Federal agency/bureau or Tribal Government In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • In All My Years UNIVERSITY of ILLINOIS LIBRARY , Portraits Of
    In All My Years UNIVERSITY Of ILLINOIS LIBRARY , Portraits of . AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN Older Blacks in STACKS Champaign-Urbana by Raymond Bial Champaign County Historical Museum Champaign, Illinois Copyright © 1983 by Champaign County Historical Museum In All My Years All rights reserved. Except for the purpose of a brief review, no part of this book may be reproduced in any form without permission in writing from the publisher. Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 83-072447 ISBN : 0-9612078-0-9 Champaign County Historical Museum 709 West University Avenue Champaign, Illinois 61820 Introduction Champaign-Urbana can be divided in many ways. Wright Street divides the two cities politically; residents can be divided into groups depending on whether or not they are affiliated with the University of Illinois, and the division of land into agricultural and non-agricultural uses is readily apparent. And Champaign-Urbana still can be divided racially. According to the 1980 federal census about ten percent of the population of Champaign-Urbana is Black. Like the other nine tenths, Blacks in Champaign-Urbana occupy every niche in the economic and social communities, and they have contributed significantly to the vitality of the two cities. Yet, their contributions have been largely overlooked. Except for a few doctoral dissertations at the University and the oral history project at the Champaign Public Library's Douglass Branch, the history of Champaign-Urbana's Black commu­ nity has not been included in the standard histories despite the fact that Blacks have been in Champaign-Urbana since the 1860's. Some may question our beginning with an exhibit of photographic portraits rather than with a more traditional overview of the history of this group.
    [Show full text]
  • 2006 Downtown Plan
    Urban Design and Development “Preserve and build on Downtown’s urban character.” Summary 19 Challenges 20-21 Guiding Principles 22 Strategies and Implementation 23-39 18 Summary Downtown Champaign, like most other downtowns throughout the United States, has undergone drastic changes over the past 50 years. A sudden loss of retail and increased dependency on automobiles led downtown to rethink its approach to doing business by providing a suburban-like experience. As a result, a number of city blocks were razed to make way for additional parking, only to see businesses fl ee to suburban shopping malls and strip centers. Over 60 buildings were lost and only a handful replaced since 1960. The map to the right shows the progressive demolition of downtown buildings (red) and the infi ll projects (yellow) that have been created. Infi ll projects have fallen short of repairing the urban fabric downtown and some times has resembled suburban developments, and not the dense urban structures that once stood in their place. The goal of this plan is to “preserve and build on downtown’s urban character”. This means This historic aerial shows the loss of downtown structures over the past 50 years. The red represents buildings lost to demolition encouraging not only renovations of existing and the yellow indicates locations of infi ll projects. Downtown once boasted signifi cant density structures but the construction of new buildings and urban form. Much of this was lost with the that refl ect urban design principles. demolition of over sixty structures between 1950 and today. See map to the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Greystone at 1463 Berwyn Avenue Saved!
    Preservation Chicago Month-In-Review Newsletter October 2017 Historic Greystone at 1463 Berwyn Avenue Saved! 1436 W. Berwyn Avenue, Photo Credit Redfin UPDATE: The intense, sustained and widespread opposition to the planned demolition and redevelopment of the historic greystone at 1436 W. Berwyn Avenue has yielded a likely victory. The historic greystone at 1436 W. Berwyn Avenue is under contract to a new preservation-sensitive buyer who has plans to deconvert the two flat to a single family home and to restore its historic features. Additionally, the landscaped side yard and mature elm tree will be preserved. The sale of this historic property removes the property from the immediate threat posed by development plans to build out the site and create six-unit building with elements of the historic façade incorporated into the new construction. Without any historic landmark district protections and with existing zoning that allowed for a much larger, more dense building as-of-right, the path to a preservation outcome was highly unlikely. However, the extraordinary rapid response preservation advocacy efforts of Kathy Klink-Flores of the Lakewood Balmoral Residents Council, the East Andersonville Residents Council (EARC), Maureen Murnane of the Lakewood Balmoral Residents Council, and other community members and community organizations, which included well-attended public meetings, a petition drive, and other community organizing efforts deserves much of credit for this excellent preservation outcome. Page 1 of 38 Preservation Chicago Month-In-Review Newsletter October 2017 Preservation Chicago applauds the consistent support and leadership of 48th Ward Alderman Harry Osterman who played an important role in the preservation effort and outcome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Chicago Tall Office Building: Artistically and Functionally Considered
    148 Kristen Schaffer The Early Chicago Tall Office Building: Artistically and Functionally Considered ity. New York was closer to Europe both geographically and culturally, and the influence of European architectural pref- erences was greater there. Chicago expressed itself through its architecture as being more pragmatic and less historical than that of New York, a bit tougher, and, especially in these early years, more in tune with the economic demands of modernity. In this context it is necessary to observe the difference between modernity and modernism. Modernity refers to the industrial revolution, the changes in the means of produc- tion, and the harnessing of new forms of energy, as well as the dislocations and economic restructuring that caused great social changes. The effects of the industrial revo- lution were exaggerated in the United States by the its rapid development, its great numbers of immigrants, and its seemingly unlimited resources. This contributed to rap- idly growing Chicago and to the development of the tall office building, especially the speculative building which was expected to produce revenue. Modernism, on the other hand (as in “international style modernism”), was an aes- thetic sensibility of philosophical, intellectual, and artistic origins. The tall office building did not originate as a work of art, but as a response to economic pressure and rising land val- ues caused by expanding business and population. In the years of rebuilding after the great fire of 1871, the Loop (or business district) became more purely commercial, but its area was limited by Lake Michigan on the east, branches of the Chicago River on the north and west, and a bulwark of railroad yards on the south.
    [Show full text]
  • Champaign County Postcards
    Champaign County Postcards No. Description 1 Antique Popcorn Wagon (color) 2 Boat Landing, Homer Park, Ill., postmarked 1930 (black & white) 3 Champaign-Urbana From Above, Copyright 1991, Larry Kanfer (color) 4 Corner of Kirby and Mattis, Champaign, Ill., Copyright 1982, Larry Kanfer (color) 5 Champaign County, Ill., Copyright 1982, Larry Kanfer (color) 6 Champaign County, Ill., Copyright 1982, Larry Kanfer (color) 7 U.S.O. Club, 315 N. Randolph St., Champaign, Ill. (color) 8 Burnham Hospital, Champaign, Ill., postmarked 1914 (color) 9 Bucher Clinic, Champaign, Ill., postmarked 1930 (color) 10 Champaign Fire, March 17, 1915 (black & white) 11 Green Street, Looking West from 6th Street, Champaign, Ill., postmarked 1909 (black & white) 12 Y.M.C.A., Champaign, Ill. (color) 13 Neil Street, South, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 14 Elk's Auditorium, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 15 Elk's Auditorium, Champaign, Ill., postmarked 1911 (black & white) 16 Main Street, Champaign, Ill., postmarked 1910 (black & white) 17 Main Street, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 18 Elk's Home, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 19 First National Bank Building, Champaign, Ill., completed 1910 (color) 20 Masonic Temple, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 21 Burham Library, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 22 Champaign Public Library, Champaign, Ill. (color) 23 First Methodist Church, Champaign, Ill. Dedicated Sept. 1, 1907 (color) 24 [missing] 25 St. Peter's Church, Champaign, Ill., dated 1921 (black & white) 26 First Baptist Church, Champaign, Ill. (color) 27 Presbyterian Church, Champaign, Ill. (color) 28 Elm Street, South of Church Street, Champaign, Ill. (black & white) 29 Neil Street, Looking South, Champaign, Ill., postmarked 1909 (black & white) 30 Champaign Public Library, Champaign, Ill.
    [Show full text]
  • ADAMS COUNTY Camp Point F
    NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES IN ILLINOIS (As of 2/16/2018) *NHL=National Historic Landmark *AD=Additional documentation received/approved by National Park Service *If a property is noted as DEMOLISHED, information indicates that it no longer stands but it has not been officially removed from the National Register. *Footnotes indicate the associated Multiple Property Submission (listing found at end of document) ADAMS COUNTY Camp Point F. D. Thomas House, 321 N. Ohio St. (7/28/1983) Clayton vicinity John Roy Site, address restricted (5/22/1978) Golden Exchange Bank, Quincy St. (2/12/1987) Golden vicinity Ebenezer Methodist Episcopal Chapel and Cemetery, northwest of Golden (6/4/1984) Mendon vicinity Lewis Round Barn, 2007 E. 1250th St. (1/29/2003) Payson vicinity Fall Creek Stone Arch Bridge, 1.2 miles northeast of Fall Creek-Payson Rd. (11/7/1996) Quincy Coca-Cola Bottling Company Building, 616 N. 24th St. (2/7/1997) Downtown Quincy Historic District, roughly bounded by Hampshire, Jersey, 4th & 8th Sts. (4/7/1983) Robert W. Gardner House, 613 Broadway St. (6/20/1979) S. J. Lesem Building, 135-137 N. 3rd St. (11/22/1999) Lock and Dam No. 21 Historic District32, 0.5 miles west of IL 57 (3/10/2004) Morgan-Wells House, 421 Jersey St. (11/16/1977) Richard F. Newcomb House, 1601 Maine St. (6/3/1982) One-Thirty North Eighth Building, 130 N. 8th St. (2/9/1984) Quincy East End Historic District, roughly bounded by Hampshire, 24th, State & 12th Sts. (11/14/1985) Quincy Northwest Historic District, roughly bounded by Broadway, N.
    [Show full text]
  • List of National Register Properties
    NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES IN ILLINOIS (As of 11/9/2018) *NHL=National Historic Landmark *AD=Additional documentation received/approved by National Park Service *If a property is noted as DEMOLISHED, information indicates that it no longer stands but it has not been officially removed from the National Register. *Footnotes indicate the associated Multiple Property Submission (listing found at end of document) ADAMS COUNTY Camp Point F. D. Thomas House, 321 N. Ohio St. (7/28/1983) Clayton vicinity John Roy Site, address restricted (5/22/1978) Golden Exchange Bank, Quincy St. (2/12/1987) Golden vicinity Ebenezer Methodist Episcopal Chapel and Cemetery, northwest of Golden (6/4/1984) Mendon vicinity Lewis Round Barn, 2007 E. 1250th St. (1/29/2003) Payson vicinity Fall Creek Stone Arch Bridge, 1.2 miles northeast of Fall Creek-Payson Rd. (11/7/1996) Quincy Coca-Cola Bottling Company Building, 616 N. 24th St. (2/7/1997) Downtown Quincy Historic District, roughly bounded by Hampshire, Jersey, 4th & 8th Sts. (4/7/1983) Robert W. Gardner House, 613 Broadway St. (6/20/1979) S. J. Lesem Building, 135-137 N. 3rd St. (11/22/1999) Lock and Dam No. 21 Historic District32, 0.5 miles west of IL 57 (3/10/2004) Morgan-Wells House, 421 Jersey St. (11/16/1977) DEMOLISHED C. 2017 Richard F. Newcomb House, 1601 Maine St. (6/3/1982) One-Thirty North Eighth Building, 130 N. 8th St. (2/9/1984) Quincy East End Historic District, roughly bounded by Hampshire, 24th, State & 12th Sts. (11/14/1985) Quincy Northwest Historic District, roughly bounded by Broadway, N.
    [Show full text]
  • In the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 19-11901-KBO Doc 108 Filed 09/27/19 Page 1 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ο : In re: : Chapter 11 Case No. 19-11901 (KBO) THE NEWS-GAZETTE, INC., et al.,1 : : (Jointly Administered) Debtors. : : Re: DI 66 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - : NOTICE OF APPOINTMENT OF CONSUMER PRIVACY OMBUDSMAN Andrew R. Vara, the Acting United States Trustee for Region 3, pursuant to section 332 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) and section VIII of this Court’s Order dated September 18, 2019 (D.I. 66) (the “Order”) directing, inter alia, the appointment of a consumer privacy ombudsman, hereby appoints Luis Salazar, having an office located at 2000 Ponce de Leon Blvd., Coral Gables, Florida 33134, Telephone: (305) 374-4802; e-mail: [email protected] as the Consumer Privacy Ombudsman in these cases. The appointee’s acknowledgement, notice of acceptance and verified statement of disinterestedness are attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 332(b) and (c) of the Bankruptcy Code provide that: (b) The consumer privacy ombudsman may appear and be heard at such hearing and shall provide to the court information to assist the court in its consideration of the facts, circumstances, and conditions of the proposed sale or lease of personally identifiable information under section 363(b)(1)(B). Such information may include presentation of-- (1) the debtor’s privacy policy; 1 The Debtors in these Chapter 11 Cases, along with the last four digits of each Debtor’s federal tax identification number, are as follows: The News-Gazette, Inc.
    [Show full text]