DOCSLIB.ORG

The American Midland Naturalist Published Quarterly by the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The American Midland Naturalist Published Quarterly by the University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana The American Midland Naturalist Published Quarterly by The University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana Vol. 152 July 2004 No. 1 Am. Midl. Nat. 152:1–11 Soil Properties and Soil Nitrogen Dynamics of Prairie-like Forest Openings and Surrounding Forests in Kentucky’s Knobs Region 1 2 3 C. C. RHOADES, S. P. MILLER AND M. M. SHEA Department of Forestry, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40546 ABSTRACT.—Herbaceous communities located within forest openings increase plant species diversity of forests in the Knobs Region of Kentucky. Although these grass-dominated communities are protected and managed for rare plant species conservation, it is unclear how soil conditions may delineate the grassland-forest boundary. We compared soil chemical and physical properties and soil nitrogen pools and transformations of three forest openings with those in the surrounding forest and the wooded edge separating the grassland and forest communities. Soil pH, extractable cations, bulk density and silt content were higher in openings compared to forest soils and extractable phosphorus was lower. In forest-opening grasslands, total soil nitrogen and the availability and production of plant-available N were 25 to 50% of levels in adjacent forest. Soils of the woody edge were similar to the surrounding forest. Our results suggest that the presence of these calcareous glade openings is highly correlated with edaphic conditions, so that efforts to expand rare plant habitat may be constrained by the distinct soils of these forest openings. INTRODUCTION Isolated herbaceous communities situated within forest openings are an important component of plant diversity in the eastern deciduous forests of North America (Quarterman et al., 1993; Anderson et al., 1999). These openings have various possible origins. They can be stable, spatially-discrete communities whose extent is controlled by edaphic conditions, successional communities originating from natural disturbance or human land use practices or communities resulting from the combination of preexisting edaphic conditions that are further modified by canopy or soil disturbance (Baskin et al., 1994). Within Kentucky, forest-opening communities are a conservation concern because they contain locally rare plant species threatened by land conversion, land degradation and woody plant encroachment. Statewide, 51 species of state or federally threatened plant 1 Corresponding author present address: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526; Telephone (970) 498-1250; FAX (970) 498-1212; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Present address: Department of Biological Sciences, Georgetown College, Georgetown, Kentucky 40324 3 Present address: Bernheim Arboretum and Research Forest, Clermont, Kentucky 40110 1 2THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 152(1) species are found within such openings (Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, 1996). Although unique soil conditions may control the extent and composition of some forest- opening communities (Anderson et al., 1999), the focus of most studies in these communities has been floristic (Baskin and Baskin, 1973, 1975, 1978). Major difference in soils of the opening and the forest could have a strong influence on the extent and successional trajectory of forest opening communities. If edaphic conditions control the location and extent of forest openings, the border between the herbaceous and forest community should be relatively stable, corresponding to a relatively abrupt change in parent material type or profile depth and associated changes in soil chemical and physical properties (Kalisz and Boettcher, 1990). In contrast, where the openings are formed by forest canopy disturbance, woody vegetation should readily reinvade herbaceous commu- nities following fire, drought, wind damage or other perturbations. In such cases, biotically mediated soil processes (i.e., nitrogen turnover, nutrient uptake and organic matter stabilization) will shift with species composition and litter inputs across the forest to grassland ecotone ( Jenny, 1980; Daniels et al., 1983; Rhoades and Coleman, 1999; Rhoades et al., 2000). Where fire suppression or other land conversion has resulted in woody plant encroachment into forest openings, forest-opening communities may expand relatively rapidly following mechanical felling of trees growing at the periphery of these openings. In contrast, where the boundary between herb-dominated forest openings and the adjacent forest corresponds to abrupt parent material transition (Kalisz and Boettcher, 1990; Boettcher and Kalisz, 1991), forest clearing may not be sufficient to promote expansion of the herbaceous species associations. In either case, without consideration of the linkage between vegetation communities and chemical or physical soil factors, efforts intended to favor expansion of unique plant species into newly cleared or expanded openings may fail. The overall objective of this study was to compare soil chemical and physical properties and soil nitrogen dynamics across the ecotone between forest openings and adjacent forest. Large differences in soil chemical conditions between the openings and surrounding forest may provide insight regarding the historic extent of the herbaceous communities and, thus, help delineate vegetation management activities aimed at maintaining or expanding the glade openings. METHODS Site description.—We studied a group of three forest openings located in Kentucky’s Knobs Region on the western border of the Bluegrass section of the Interior Low Plateaus Physiographic Province (Quarterman et al., 1993; Fig. 1). The study site is located at the Bernheim Arboretum and Research Forest, in the southern extreme of Bullitt County (378529N; 858359W) near its border with Nelson County. The openings are on south-facing slopes associated with calcareous shale interbedded with dolomite of the Silurian lower Laurel formation (Kepferle, 1969). The series of openings corresponds to a band of soils mapped as Caneyville-Rock outcrop or Caneyville-Beasley-Rock outcrop complexes and classified as fine, mixed mesic Typic Hapludalfs (Soil Conservation Service Staff, 1986). Together these soil groups cover about 5% of Bullitt County. In Kentucky’s Knobs Region on the ‘‘driest situations, where limestone outcrops exist,’’ Braun (1950) described ‘‘xerophytic red cedar communities and occasional typical prairie patches’’ amidst the surrounding deciduous forest. Such openings are currently classified as either limestone glades (Evans, 1991) or xeric limestone prairies (Baskin et al., 1994). At the Bernheim forest, ‘‘glade’’ openings were noted on land deed boundaries surveyed in the 2004 RHOADES ET AL.: FOREST SOIL PROPERTIES 3 FIG. 1.—Study site location at the Bernheim Research Forest and Arboretum within Kentucky’s Knobs Physiographic Region 1780s (Dickson and Kollath, 2001). The three forest openings were visible on 1928 aerial photographs. Presently, the 0.25 to 0.30 ha openings are the only herbaceous-plant- dominated hillside communities known within the 6500 ha Bernheim Research Forest. The openings are dominated by the grasses Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash and Sporobolus vaginiflorus Torr. and to a lesser extent by Panicum capillare L. and Danthonia spicata L. Common forbs include Scutellaria parvula Michx., Lithospermum canescens Michx., Croton monanthogynus Michx., Hypericum dolabriforme Vent. and Echinacea simulata McGregor. The openings also contain the state-listed threatened plants Viola septemloba Le Conte var. egglestonii (Brainerd) McKinney and Spiranthes magnicamporum Sheviak (Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission, 1996). Juniperus virginiana L. is the most abundant tree scattered within the forest openings and within both the edge and forest communities (Table 1). In addition to J. virginiana, the overstory community of the forest surrounding the openings is codominated by Fraxinus americana Marshall, Acer saccharum Marshall, Quercus muehlenbergii Engelm. and Pinus virginiana Miller. Cercis canadensis L. and Rhamnus caroliniana Walter. are common midstory species within all three community types. Surface features differ between the forest openings and the surrounding habitats. Large exposures of rock are absent from the openings, whereas gravel, cobble or bare soil cover about 60% of the openings. Exposed rock and soil are absent from forest sites and cover only 13% of the wooded edge. Study design.—Each of three sites was partitioned into the following habitat types arranged in concentric zones: (1) opening, (2) woody edge and (3) surrounding forest. The openings were round to elliptical; distance from the center of the openings to the woody edges ranged from 15 to 50 m. The woody edge formed a 5- to 10 m-wide band. Two transects originating at the opening center and radiating through the edge and into surrounding forest were located at each opening site (n ¼ 6 transects). In each opening, transects were stratified into opposing halves of the opening then oriented along randomly selected radii (i.e., 1 to 1808 or 181 to 3608). Along each transect, sample plots were located (1) midway between the opening center and the woody edge, (2) centered within the wooded edge and (3) 20 m beyond the edge within the surrounding forest (n ¼ 6 plots per vegetation zone). Chemical and physical soil properties.—The chemical and physical properties of opening and surrounding forest soil profiles were sampled and analyzed by depth increments extending 4THE AMERICAN MIDLAND NATURALIST 152(1) TABLE 1.—Density,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Results of Investigations of Surface-Water Quality, 1987-90
    WATER-QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE KENTUCKY RIVER BASIN, KENTUCKY: RESULTS OF INVESTIGATIONS OF SURFACE-WATER QUALITY, 1987-90 By Kirn H. Haag, Rene Garcia, G. Lynn Jarrett, and Stephen D. Porter U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 95-4163 Louisville, Kentucky . 1995 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director For additional information write to: Copies of this report can be purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Earth Science Information Center District Office Open-File Reports Section 2301 Bradley Avenue Box 25286, MS 517 Louisville, KY 40217 Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 FOREWORD The mission of the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) is to assess the quantity and quality of the earth resources of the Nation and to provide information that will assist resource managers and policymakers at Federal, State, and local levels in making sound decisions. Assessment of water-quality conditions and trends is an important part of this overall mission. One of the greatest challenges faced by water-resources scientists is acquiring reliable information that will guide the use and protection of the Nation's water resources. That challenge is being addressed by Federal, State, interstate, and local water-resource agencies and by many academic institutions. These organizations are collecting water-quality data for a host of purposes that include: compliance with permits and water-supply standards; development of remediation plans for a specific contamination problem; operational decisions on industrial, wastewater, or water-supply facilities; and research on factors that affect water quality.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Domain Management Plan
    Domain Management Plan 2019-2029 FINAL DRAFT 12/20/2019 Owner Contact: Amy Turner, Ph.D., CWB Director of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability The University of the South Sewanee, Tennessee Office: 931-598-1447 Office: Cleveland Annex 110C Email: [email protected] Reviewed by: The Nature Conservancy Forest Stewards Guild ____________________________________________________________________________ Tract Location: Franklin and Marion Counties, Tennessee Centroid Latitude 35.982963 Longitude -85.344382 Tract Size: 13,036 acres | 5,275 hectares Land Manager: Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability, The University of the South, Sewanee, Tennessee 2 Executive Summary The primary objective of this management plan is to provide a framework to outline future management and outline operations for the Office of Environmental Stewardship and Sustainability (OESS) over the next ten years. In this plan, we will briefly introduce the physical and biological setting, past land use, and current uses of the Domain. The remainder of the plan consists of an assessment of the forest, which has been divided into six conservation areas. These conservation areas contain multiple management compartments, and the six areas have similarities in topographical position and past land use. Finally, the desired future condition and project summary of each conservation area and compartment has been outlined. Background The University of the South consists of an academic campus (382 acres) with adjacent commercial and residential areas (783 acres) that are embedded within and surrounded by diverse natural lands (11,838 acres). The term “Domain” is used interchangeably to describe both the entire ~13,000 acres and the 11,800-acre natural land matrix (also referred to as the “Greater Domain”).
    [Show full text]
  • General Geological Information for the Tri-States of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee
    General Geological Information for the Tri-States Of Kentucky, Virginia and Tennessee Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Field Trip to Pound Gap Road Cut U.S. Highway 23 Letcher County, Kentucky September 28 and 29, 2001 Guidebook Number 41 Summaries Prepared by: Bruce A. Rodgers, PG. SEGS Vice President 2001 Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Guidebook Number 41 September 2001 Page 1 Table of Contents Section 1 P HYSIOGRAPHIC P ROVINCES OF THE R EGION Appalachian Plateau Province Ridge and Valley Province Blue Ridge Province Other Provinces of Kentucky Other Provinces of Virginia Section 2 R EGIONAL G EOLOGIC S TRUCTURE Kentucky’s Structural Setting Section 3 M INERAL R ESOURCES OF THE R EGION Virginia’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Tennessee’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Kentucky’s Geological Mineral and Mineral Fuel Resources Section 4 G ENERAL I NFORMATION ON C OAL R ESOURCES OF THE R EGION Coal Wisdom Section 5 A CTIVITIES I NCIDENTAL TO C OAL M INING After the Coal is Mined - Benefaction, Quality Control, Transportation and Reclamation Section 6 G ENERAL I NFORMATION ON O IL AND NATURAL G AS R ESOURCES IN THE R EGION Oil and Natural Gas Enlightenment Section 7 E XPOSED UPPER P ALEOZOIC R OCKS OF THE R EGION Carboniferous Systems Southeastern Geological Society (SEGS) Guidebook Number 41 September 2001 Page i Section 8 R EGIONAL G ROUND W ATER R ESOURCES Hydrology of the Eastern Kentucky Coal Field Region Section 9 P INE M OUNTAIN T HRUST S HEET Geology and Historical Significance of the
    [Show full text]
  • The Tennessee River Basin
    The Tennessee River Basin he Tennessee River winds its way for roughly geography and geology in the region help to explain 650 miles through Tennessee, Alabama, why the area harbors one of the most biologically TMississippi, and back into Tennessee, before diverse freshwater ecosystems in the world. reaching Kentucky where it empties into the The immense biodiversity of native and endangered Ohio River. In total the Basin encompasses over species in the Tennessee River Basin (TRB) has driven 40,000 square miles, covering five major regional efforts— engaging multiple agencies physiographic provinces: the Blue Ridge, and stakeholders to ensure the protection the Valley and Ridge, the Appalachian of this unique landscape for generations Plateau, the Interior Low Plateaus, to come. and the Coastal Plain. The extent of the Basin’s reach vast diversity of Eastern Hellbender - because of their preference for clean streams and rivers, hellbenders serve as indicators of stream health. The presence of young and adults is synonymous with good water quality. To learn more about the Tennessee River Basin Network and see how you or your organization can be involved please visit http://applcc.org/projects/trb. FACT SHEET: THE TENNESSEE RIVER BASIN NETWORK Tennessee River Basin Network Dedicated to the conservation of this unique region and The Network strives to E RIIV national treasure, the Tennessee River Basin Network conserve and restore aquatic SE ER S B EE A (hereafter Network) is a partnership of states, cities, counties, resources, particularly areas N A SS N N II federal agencies, academic organizations, business, and of high biologic diversity EE NN TT other non-governmental organizations dedicated to throughout the region, enhancing the health of the watersheds and biological improve water quality, resources within the Tennessee River Basin through foster increasing stewardship N increased regional collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Linking Conservation Priorities to Wetland and Stream Mitigation Decisions
    A watershed planning approach for the Stones River, Tennessee Linking Conservation Priorities to Wetland and Stream Mitigation Decisions A watershed planning approach for the Stones River, Tennessee A watershed planning approach for the Stones River, Tennessee Acknowledgements The authors wish to acknowledge the assistance of several individuals and agencies that have contributed to the design and execution of this project. Kathleen Kuná with the regulatory branch of the Nashville District Corps of Engineers enthusiastically provided her leadership at the stakeholder workshop and her support through the plan’s development and review. Mike Lee with the Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation Division of Water Pollution Control (TDEC-WPC) guided our methodological approach and shared knowledge from his years of experience with wetland permitting decisions. Members of the Tennessee Interagency Review Team for mitigation engaged with The Nature Conservancy (TNC) planning team during critical planning phases, advised us on available data, and critiqued our methodology and analysis results. These team members included Kim Pilarski - Tennessee Valley Authority, Rob Todd – Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency, Robbie Sykes – U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Mike Zeman – U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. Dr. Ken Morgan from Tennessee Technological University shared his technical knowledge regarding wetland field determinations and the proper applications of spatial data. Dan Eagar with the TDEC-WPC’s Natural Resources section participated in technical review meetings provided advice on stream mitigation regulatory issues. The Environmental Law Institute (ELI) has conducted research on wetland mitigation for over two decades. This project benefitted greatly from ELI’s efforts and publications on many aspects of wetland laws and regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Distance— Walk
    1 The map is marked in /8 -mile increments. 1 1. You have reached the end of the children’s garden site ( /8 mile). 2. the bench on the right is in memory of Frank and Marie Schabel (¼ mile). 3 After your walk, consider 3. You are entering the Knobs region of central Kentucky and leaving the Mississippian plateaus ( /8 mile). a visit to the beautiful 4. on the left you will see a cluster of eastern red cedar trees (½ mile). Rose Garden for your cool 5 5. You are now entering the appalachian plateau region, a region in eastern Kentucky ( /8 mile). down. its more than 1,500 6. Across Kentucky varieties make up the As you enter this broad curve, you will be able to see the parking lot near the Greg page apartments (¾ mile). 7 Walk best collection of roses in 12 7. In summer, enchanted outdoor audiences enjoy the Shakespeare festival that takes place downslope from the path ( /8 mile). This nearly two-mile paved path around the arboretum Kentucky. another option 13 8. To the right is the picnic area. nearby are large native black cherry trees and a livestock watering trough (1 mile). 1 showcases the seven geophysical regions of Kentucky. as is the Home demonstra- 9. As you enter the Bluegrass region, you will notice a sign describing this central Kentucky region (1 /8 mile). an ongoing project, the Walk currently has in place canopy tion Garden, comprised of 10. Stay on the paved path as you pass the two wood-chip entrances to the arboretum Woods trail (1¼ mile).
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes
    The floristic and community ecology of seasonally wet limestone glade seeps of Tennessee and Kentucky Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes Austin Peay State University Department of Biology and Center of Excellence for Field Biology Clarksville, Tennessee 37044, U.S.A. [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT An open, seasonally wet seep community supporting herbaceous vegetation occurs within the limestone cedar glade complex of the southeastern United States. The purpose of this study is to describe the floristic composition of these limestone glade seeps. A floristic inventory of 9 season- ally wet sites in central Tennessee and south-central Kentucky was performed, documenting 114 species and infraspecific taxa in 91 genera and 43 families. Vegetation analysis identified the dominant taxa as Eleocharis bifida (% IV 20.3), Sporobolus vaginiflorus (% IV 11.94), Hypericum sphaerocarpum (% IV 5.97), Allium aff. stellatum (% IV 4.71), Clinopodium glabellum/arkansanum (% IV 4.15), Schoenolirion croceum (% IV 3.89), Juncus filipendulus (% IV 3.89), and Carex crawei (% IV 3.84). Gratiola quartermaniae and Isoëtes butleri are also important members of the community and may serve as indicator species. A wetland assessment of the seep community was performed according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate regional supplements. Wetland vegetation requirements are satisfied in 8 of the 9 seasonally wet sites sampled. The limestone glade seeps appear to represent a previously unclassified seasonal wetland type. RESUMEN Una comunidad abierta, húmeda estacionalmente por filtración, compuesta por vegetación herbácea se da en el complejo de pantanos cal- cáreos de cedro del sureste de los Estados Unidos.
    [Show full text]
  • A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: an East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-1969 A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East- West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee Dennis E. Quillen University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Geography Commons Recommended Citation Quillen, Dennis E., "A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee. " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 1969. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2782 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Dennis E. Quillen entitled "A Geographic Study of the Tennessee Central Railway: An East-West Transport Route Across the Cumberland Plateau of Tennessee." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Geography. Loyal Durand, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Robert G. Long, William N. Cherry Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Au gust 1, 1969 To the Graduate Council : I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Dennis E.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Conservation Planning in the Interior Low Plateaus
    Bird Conservation Planning in the Interior Low Plateaus Robert P. Ford Michael D. Roedel Abstract—The Interior Low Plateaus (ILP) is a 12,000,000 ha area has been dominated historically by oak-hickory forests, physiographic province that includes middle Kentucky, middle with areas of rock outcrops and glade habitats, prairies, and Tennessee, and northern Alabama. Spatial analysis of Breeding barrens (Martin and others 1993). All habitats now are highly Bird Atlas data has been used to determine relationships between fragmented. Currently, this project includes only Kentucky, the nature of high priority bird communities and broad features of Tennessee, and Alabama; the remainder of the ILP will be the habitat. A standardized vegetation classification using satellite incorporated later. Distinct subdivisions within the current imagery, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), GAP Analysis, scope of the project include the Bluegrass region and Shawnee and Breeding Bird Atlas data, were used to develop landscape-level Hills in Kentucky; the Western Highland Rim, Eastern High- habitat models for the ILP. The objectives of this effort were to: (1) land Rim, and Central Basin of Tennessee; and the Tennessee identify centers of abundance for species and/or species assem- River Valley of Alabama (fig. 1). These subdivisions serve as blages within the ILP, (2) identify and prioritize areas for potential distinct conservation planning units. About 95% of the land acquisition and/or public-private partnerships for conservation, (3) base consists of non-industrial forest lands, open lands for identify areas with the highest potential for restoration of degraded agriculture (pasture), and urban areas. Public lands and habitats, (4) identify specific lands managed by project cooperators lands managed by the forest products industry make up less where integration of nesting songbird management is a high prior- than 5% of the total area (Vissage and Duncan 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • Classification and Evaluation of Forest Sites on the Northern Cumberland Plateau
    .,;;~~~\ United States IttAc.. !)) Department of Classification and Evaluation \:..~ Agriculture Forest Service of Forest Sites on the Southern Forest Northern Cumberland Plateau Experiment Station New Orleans, Louisianfl General rechnical Report SO-60 March 1986 Glendon W. Smalley SUMMARY This paper presents a comprehensive forest site classification system for the northern Cumberland Plateau in north central Tennessee and eastern Ken­ tucky. The system is based on physiography, geology, soils, topography, and vegetation. Twenty-four landtypes are described and evaluated in terms of productivity and desirability of selected pines and hardwoods for timber pro­ duction. Also, each landtype is rated for five soil-related problems that can affect forest management operations. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am indebted to my colleagues, past and present, for their scientific input, reviews, and stimulating discussions. I am also grateful to the soil scientist$, silviculturists, plant ecologists, and practicing foresters who have reviewed this guide. CONTENTS Introduction ..................................................... 1 Northern Cumberland Plateau Region............................. 1 Subregions and LandtypeAssociations ..... ..... ... .. .. ... .. ...... 11 Landtypes ....................................................... 15 Forest Management Interpretations ............................... 16 Using the System ................................................ 17 Landtype Descriptions and Forest Management Interpretations . 23 Literature Cited ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Kentucky
    Summary Table: Characteristics of the Ecoregions of Kentucky 6 8 . SOUTHWESTERN APPALACHIANS 7 1 . INTERIOR PLATEAU (continued) * * Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Vegetation / Land Cover and Land Use Level IV Ecoregion Physiography Geology Soil Climate Potential Natural Vegetation / Land Cover and Land Use Present Vegetation Present Vegetation Area Elevation/ Surficial and Bedrock Order (Great Group) Common Soil Series Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature *Source: Küchler, 1964 Area Elevation/ Surficial and Bedrock Order (Great Group) Common Soil Series Temperature/ Precipitation Frost Free Mean Temperature * (square Local Relief Moisture Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; (square Local Relief Moisture Mean annual Mean annual January min/max; Source: Küchler, 1964 o miles) (feet) Regimes (inches) (days) July min/max ( F) miles) (feet) Regimes (inches) (days) July min/max (oF) 68a. Cumberland 607 Unglaciated. Open low hills, ridges, 980-1500/ Quaternary colluvium and alluvium. Ultisols (Hapludults). Shelocta, Gilpin, Latham, Mesic/ 47-51 170-185 23/46; Mixed mesophytic forest; American chestnut was a former dominant Mostly forest or reverting to forest. Also some 71d. Outer 4707 Glaciated in north. Rolling to hilly upland 382-1100/ Quaternary alluvium, loess, and in Mostly Alfisols Mostly Lowell, Cynthiana, Mesic/ 38-48. 160-210 20/45; Mostly oak–hickory forest. On Silurian dolomite: white oak stands Cropland, pastureland, woodland, military Plateau rolling uplands, and intervening valleys. 100-520 Mostly Pennsylvanian sandstone, shale, On floodplains: Entisols Muse, Clymer, Whitley, Udic. On 63/88 on drier sites/ On mesic sites: forests variously dominated by pastureland and limited cropland. Logging, Bluegrass containing small sinkholes, springs, 50-450 northernmost Kentucky, discontinuous (Hapludalfs, Fragiudalfs); Faywood, Beasley, Crider, Udic.
    [Show full text]
  • Kentucky Landscapes Through Geologic Time Series XII, 2011 Daniel I
    Kentucky Geological Survey James C. Cobb, State Geologist and Director MAP AND CHART 200 UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY, LEXINGTON Kentucky Landscapes Through Geologic Time Series XII, 2011 Daniel I. Carey Introduction The Ordovician Period Since Kentucky was covered by shallow The MississippianEarly Carboniferous Period 356 Ma Many types of sharks lived in Kentucky during the Mississippian; some had teeth for crinoid We now unders tand that the earth’s crust is broken up into a number of tropical seas du ring most of the Ordovician capturing swimming animals and others had teeth especially adapted for crushing and During most of the Ordovician, Kentucky was covered by shallow, tropical seas Period (Figs. 6–7), the fossils found in Sea Floor eating shellfish such as brachiopods, clams, crinoids, and cephalopods (Fig. 23). plates, some of continental size, and that these plates have been moving— (Fig. 4). Limestones, dolomites, and shales were formed at this time. The oldest rocks Kentucky's Ordovician rocks are marine (sea- Spreading Ridge Siberia centimeters a year—throughout geologic history, driven by the internal heat exposed at the surface in Kentucky are the hard limestones of the Camp Nelson dwelling) invertebrates. Common Ordovician bryozoan crinoid, Culmicrinus horn PANTHALASSIC OCEAN Ural Mts. Kazakstania of the earth. This movement creates our mountain chains, earthquakes, Limestone (Middle Ordovician age) (Fig. 5), found along the Kentucky River gorge in fossils found in Kentucky include sponges (of North China crinoid, corals crinoid, central Kentucky between Boonesboro and Frankfort. Older rocks are present in the Rhopocrinus geologic faults, and volcanoes. The theory of plate tectonics (from the Greek, the phylum Porifera), corals (phylum Cnidaria), cephalopod, PALEO- South China Rhopocrinus subsurface, but can be seen only in drill cuttings and cores acquired from oil and gas North America tektonikos: pertaining to building) attemp ts to describe the process and helps bryozoans, brachiopods (Fig.
    [Show full text]