DOCSLIB.ORG

The Responsibility Threshold for Military Officership

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Responsibility Threshold for Military Officership VOLUME 1 2018 NUMBER 1 AN OCCASIONAL PAPER SERIES The Responsibility Threshold for Military Officership Maj Joseph O. Chapa (USAF) Department of Philosophy, United States Air Force Academy CENTER FOR CHARACTER & LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT EDITORIAL STAFF: Dr. Douglas Lindsay, USAF (Ret), Editor in Chief Ms. Julie Imada, Editor and Chief, CCLD Strategic Communications JCLD is published at the United States Air Force Academy, Colorado Springs, Colorado. Articles in JCLD may be reproduced in whole or in part without permission. A standard source credit line is required for each reprint or citation. For information about the Journal of Character and Leadership Development or the U.S. Air Force Academy’s Center for Character and Leadership Development, to inquire about print subscriptions, or to be added to the Journal’s electronic subscription list, contact us at: [email protected] Phone: 719-333-4904 The Journal of Character & Leadership Development The Center for Character & Development U.S. Air Force Academy 2300 Cadet Drive Suite 300 USAF Academy, CO 80840-62600 ISSN 2372-9465 (print) ISSN 2372-9481 (online) Manuscripts may be submitted via Scholastica at https://jcld.scholasticahq.com/for-authors INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION Leading Through Change Mark C. Anarumo, Col, USAF Permanent Professor Director, Center for Character and Leadership Development Douglas R Lindsay, PhD Editor in Chief Journal of Character and Leadership Development Greetings readers, and thank you for Force Academy in the Center for Character & considering this Occasional Paper and allowing Leadership Development (CCLD), the aim of us to introduce our new Journal of Character the new Journal of Character and Leadership and Leadership Development. We are excited Development (JCLD) extends to the larger about this evolution of our previous publication academic and applied communities. The intent and honored to take our place as scholarship is to establish a forum for the discussion of leaders in the emerging fields of character and topics relevant to leadership and character leadership development. development. Over the past several years, the JCLI filled Many of you will recall our previous a gap in the literature. JCLD will still fill the publication, the Journal of Character and previously identified gap, but will significantly Leadership Integration (JCLI). JCLI was increase the quality of scholarship and presence established to contribute to the science and in the field. Though the formal JCLD will discourse around the integration of the be published semi-annually, there will be leadership and character domains. In the past, scholarship outside normal publication cycles. as is true with many academic disciplines, In order to get this scholarship that is both these topics were studied in isolation. In fact, innovative and pushes our thinking out to there are many decades of substantial research larger audiences in a timely manner, CCLD has on both character and leadership which were begun publishing an Occasional Paper Series. studied independently. While this approach This outlet allows us to examine topics that has produced insight into these complex may not fit squarely within the intent of the topics, we have found that it is integration Journal but provides critical insight into topics of such work that is critical for development of interest. Through this Series, we hope to in both of these areas. While the focus of expand the dialogue around topics of interest to this initial effort was at the United States Air our readership in support of JCLD. INTRODUCTION 1 THE RESPONSIBILITY THRESHOLD FOR MILITARY OFFICERSHIP The current Occasional Paper was written by that officership consists of the responsibility Maj Joseph Chapa and is an excellent treatise around four dimensions: personnel, financial on the topic of officership. In the paper, Maj resources, mission objectives, and concentrated Chapa elaborates on the distinctions that are lethality. Through a balanced discussion, he made between the officer and enlisted forces outlines how these dimensions can be used to and the limitations of previous definitions determine thresholds that drive the demand of officership. The case that he uses as the for officer leadership. After a cogent discussion backdrop for the discussion is the recent use of the dimensions, he addresses a common of enlisted personnel as Global Hawk piolots. objection to officership, or what he refers to as He adeptly steps through seminal work done the “Lieutenant Problem.” This is the situation by Huntington and Stavridis and colleagues, that exists when a new Lieutenant is placed in identifies limitations to how officership a leadership situation over numerous personnel is defined, and distinguishes between the that have much more experience. Through officer and enlisted forces. As a result of that an insightful application of the model, Maj discussion, he presents a framework that can Chapa examines several examples of Lieutenant be used to explain our traditional distinction Apprenticeship that have been successfully between officers and enlisted members. The implemented to help grow future leaders. framework has four dimensions that overcome We hope you will enjoy this first Occasional the limitations of previous definitions of Paper and we look forward to bringing you officership and can be used to account for timely and innovated content for many years to both combat and support officers. Instead come through this series and the new Journal of of focusing on previous factors such as Character and Leadership Development. education and leadership training, he states 2 FEATURE FEATURE The Responsibility Threshold for Military Officership Maj Joseph O. Chapa (USAF) is now a graduate student in philosophy at the University of Oxford. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the United States Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the United States Government. Correspondence concerning this article can be sent to [email protected] Joseph Chapa is a Major in the U.S. Air Force and a doctoral student in Philosophy at the University of Oxford. He is a Senior Pilot with more than 1,000 flight and instructor hours, many of which were flown in support of major US combat and humanitarian operations. He holds an M.A. in Philosophy from Boston College, and a B.A. in Philosophy from Boston University. His areas of expertise include the Just War Tradition, military ethics, and especially the ethics of remote and autonomous weapons. ABSTRACT This paper proposes a new framework for defining military officership. Developments in technology and policy have raised questions about the nature of the profession of arms and long-held distinctions between officer and enlisted roles. Recent scholarship has argued that the advent of the cyber domain demands that we broaden the expertise of the military professional from Huntington’s traditional conception of the “management of violence.” At the same time, the US Air Force has recently opened RQ-4 Global Hawk pilot positions to enlisted members—a significant departure from Air Force cultural norms. The paper argues that recent conceptions fail to account for the officer/enlisted distinction and that officership ought to be defined instead in terms of the additive responsibility for people, finances, mission objectives, and concentrated lethality. This conception of officership provides a model against which to evaluate military positions to determine whether they ought to be filled by officers or enlisted members. Conclusions, though they will be applicable to the enlisted Global Hawk pilot decision, will also apply much more broadly to joint and international conceptions of military officership. FEATURE 3 THE RESPONSIBILITY THRESHOLD FOR MILITARY OFFICERSHIP Introduction There may be a strong temptation here to In late 2015, the Secretary and Chief of Staff of cast both questions in normative terms. (a) the US Air Force announced that future RQ-4 What ought to be the role of the officer, and Global Hawk pilot positions will be filled, (b) ought officers to fill Global Hawk pilot at least in part, by enlisted Airmen (SECAF positions. These are both interesting questions Public Affairs, 2015). The first class of enlisted but putting the first question in normative pilots completed undergraduate remotely terms is tantamount to asking “ought there to piloted aircraft training (URT) in May of 2017, be an officer/enlisted distinction at all?” Such breaking a precedent that had been in place a discussion would open too many doors and since WWII (Martin, 2017). This tremendous close too few, and this cannot be a paper about change in the relationship between Air Force everything. Instead, this paper’s scope is limited aviation roles and force structure invites a long- by the recognition that there is an officer/ overdue discussion of the profession of arms in enlisted distinction. What is at stake here is the general and the distinction between officers and descriptive (rather than the normative) question enlisted members in particular. about the grounds on which the officer/enlisted The fact that enlisted Airmen will (and in distinction is based in actual practice. fact already do) pilot the RQ-4 Global Hawk I propose the following outline for the work raises an important question: Should we limit that lies ahead. First, I will engage Huntington’s (or should we have limited) Global Hawk classic and still widely accepted conception pilot positions (or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS for CAP Members
    PROMOTION REQUIREMENTS for CAP Members BY JOHN W. TALBOTT, Lt Col, CAP NEBRASKA WING Developed on 03/15/02 Update on 26 February 2006 AIR FORCE OFFICER RANKS Colonel (O-6) (Col) Second Lieutenant (O-1) (2nd Lt) st Brigadier General (O-7) (Brig Gen) First Lieutenant (O-2) (1 Lt) Captain (O-3) (Capt) Major General (08) (Maj Gen) Major (O-4) (Maj) Army Air Corps Lieutenant Colonel (O-5) (Lt Col) AIR FORCE NCO RANKS Chief Master Sergeant (E-9) (CMsgt) Senior Master Sergeant (E-8) (SMsgt) Master Sergeant (E-7) (Msgt) Technical Sergeant (E-6) (Tsgt) Staff Sergeant (E-5) (Ssgt) CAP Flight Officers Rank Flight Officer: Technical Flight Officer Senior Flight Officer NOTE: The following is a compilation of CAP Regulation 50-17 and CAP 35-5. It is provided as a quick way of evaluating the promotion and training requirements for CAP members, and is not to be treated as an authoritative document, but instead it is provided to assist CAP members in understanding how the two different regulations are inter-related. Since regulations change from time to time, it is recommended that an individual using this document consult the actual regulations when an actual promotion is being evaluated or submitted. Individual section of the pertinent regulations are included, and marked. John W. Talbott, Lt Col, CAP The following are the requirements for various specialty tracks. (Example: promotion to the various ranks for senior Personnel, Cadet Programs, etc.) members in Civil Air Patrol (CAP): For promotion to SFO, one needs to complete 18 months as a TFO, (See CAPR 35-5 for further details.) and have completed level 2: (Attend Squadron Leadership School, complete Initially, all Civil Air Patrol the CAP Officer course ECI Course 13 members who are 18 years or older are or military equivalent, and completes the considered senior members, (with no requirements for a Technician rating in a senior member rank worn), when they specialty track (this is completed for join Civil Air Patrol.
    [Show full text]
  • Royal Navy Warrant Officer Ranks
    Royal Navy Warrant Officer Ranks anisodactylousStewart coils unconcernedly. Rodolfo impersonalizing Cletus subducts contemptibly unbelievably. and defining Lee is atypically.empurpled and assumes transcriptively as Some records database is the database of the full command secretariat, royal warrant officer Then promoted for sailing, royal navy artificer. Navy Officer Ranks Warrant Officer CWO2 CWO3 CWO4 CWO5 These positions involve an application of technical and leadership skills versus primarily. When necessary for royal rank of ranks, conduct of whom were ranked as equivalents to prevent concealment by seniority those of. To warrant officers themselves in navy officer qualified senior commanders. The rank in front of warrants to gain experience and! The recorded and transcribed interviews help plan create a fuller understanding of so past. Royal navy ranks based establishment or royal marines. Marshals of the Royal Air and remain defend the active list for life, example so continue to use her rank. He replace the one area actually subvert the commands to the Marines. How brave I wonder the records covered in its guide? Four stars on each shoulder boards in a small arms and royals forming an! Courts martial records range from detailed records of proceedings to slaughter the briefest details. RNAS ratings had service numbers with an F prefix. RFA and MFA vessels had civilian crews, so some information on tracing these individuals can understand found off our aim guide outline the Mercantile Marine which the today World War. Each rank officers ranks ordered aloft on royal warrant officer ranks structure of! Please feel free to distinguish them to see that have masters pay.
    [Show full text]
  • FREE August 26-September 1, 2021 • Vol. 47, No. 5 Fall Guide
    FREE August 26-September 1, 2021 • Vol. 47, No. 5 Fall Guide August 26-September 1, 2021 | Illinois Times | 1 2 | www.illinoistimes.com | August 26-September 1, 2021 NEWS Reaching rural residents Hospitals struggle with COVID-19 increases while many still refuse vaccines PUBLIC HEALTH | Rachel Otwell “We have individuals who get COVID and was at the Petersburg press conference and then ask if they can have a vaccine,” Dr. addressed the distrust along party lines. “This Rajesh Govindaiah told Illinois Times. He’s is controversial and it’s become unfortunately senior vice president and chief medical officer politicized,” he said. “People should be for Memorial Health System. “The vaccine vaccinated. I think those of us in public does not treat COVID. The vaccine prevents positions should be encouraging people you from getting COVID in the first place. to do that.” Butler said he’d prefer certain And if you get COVID, it makes you have decisions, like mask rules, be left up to local a milder illness.” For those already infected officials rather than the governor. Still, he said, with COVID-19, the vaccine is useless, “Vaccinations work, masks work.” because it takes time to build up immunity. Bilyeu said misinformation and fear might “My daughter’s going to in-person school. play into why some are hesitant about vaccines. I want her to go to in-person school for the For those who forgo vaccination, he said rest of the school year,” said Govindaiah. COVID-19 infection is a matter of when, not “In order for that to happen, we’re going if.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings RAF Booklet
    Combined Cadet Force Royal Air Force A Commissioning Aide Memoire for the Officer Cadre Version 1 “Where else could you learn to fly aerobatics, visit Royal Air Force Stations, tour foreign countries, play sports from local to international level, learn the skills to lead expeditions, become a target shooting marksman, gain your Duke of Edinburgh Awards, canoe through white water, assist your community, join a band, learn aviation subjects, go caving, parachute, climb, sail, ski...? These and much more are readily available to you as a member of the Air Cadet Organization.” Air Commodore Jon Chitty OBE. Introduction The school cadet organisation originates from 1859, when schools at Eton, Harrow, Rugby, Rossall, Felsted, Hurstpierpoint, Winchester and Tonbridge formed armed uniformed units as part of a national reserve to counter a perceived threat from abroad. By 1900, cadet units were established in over 100 schools across the country and in 1908, these units were re-titled the Officer Training Corps (OTC). In 1948, the OTC was renamed the Combined Cadet Force. The aim of the Combined Cadet Force is to provide a framework through which young people develop the qualities of team work, self-reliance, resourcefulness, leadership and responsibility. A weekly programme of military training is designed to give young people at King’s a chance to exercise responsibility and leadership, to provide them with knowledge of our defence forces, and to encourage those who might be interested in becoming officers of the Armed Services. Uniform members of the Combined Cadet Force will regularly stay on Royal Air Forces bases, therefore it is important that cadets are able to demonstrate an awareness of the structure and organisation of the Royal Air Force, its role in the defence of the United Kingdom and her interests and the operations in which the Royal Air Force are currently engaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Craig-Cvd506-Manual.Pdf
    .BJOUFOBODFBOE$BSF $BSJOHGPSUIF6OJU *ODMJOBUJPO ti5IFBQQBSBUVTTIBMMOPUCFFYQPTFEUPESJQQJOHPS t%POPUJOTUBMMUIFVOJUJOBOJODMJOFEQPTJUJPO*UJTEFTJHOFE TQMBTIJOHwBOEUIBUOPPCKFDUTGJMMFEXJUIMJRVJETIBMM UPCFPQFSBUFEJOBIPSJ[POUBMQPTJUJPOPOMZ CFQMBDFEPOUIFVOJU t*GBOZUIJOHGBMMTJOUPUIFDBCJOFU VOQMVHUIFVOJUBOEIBWF "WPJE*OUFSGFSFODF JUDIFDLFECZRVBMJGJFEQFSTPOOFMCFGPSFPQFSBUJOHJUBOZ t8IFOZPVQMBDFUIJTVOJUOFBS57 SBEJPPS7$3 UIFQJDUVSF GVSUIFS NBZCFDPNFQPPSBOEUIFTPVOENBZCFEJTUPSUFE*OUIJT DBTF NPWFUIFVOJUBXBZGSPNUIF57 SBEJPPS7$3 $MFBOJOHUIF6OJU t5PQSFWFOUGJSFPSTIPDLIB[BSE EJTDPOOFDUZPVSVOJUGSPN %JTDPOOFDU1PXFS UIF"$QPXFSTPVSDFXIFODMFBOJOH t*GZPVBSFOPUHPJOHUPVTFUIFVOJUGPSBMPOHUJNF CF t5IFGJOJTIPOZPVSVOJUNBZCFDMFBOFEXJUIBEVTUDMPUI TVSFUPEJTDPOOFDUUIFVOJUGSPNUIFXBMMPVUMFU5P BOEDBSFEGPSBTPUIFSGVSOJUVSF EJTDPOOFDUUIF"$QPXFSDPSE NBJOMFBET HSBTQUIFQMVH 6TFDBVUJPOXIFODMFBOJOHBOEXJQJOHUIFQMBTUJDQBSUT JUTFMG OFWFSQVMMUIFDPSE t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
    [Show full text]
  • Person Name - Prefix a Table of Salutations That May Precede an Individual’S Name to Identify Social Status
    Person Name - Prefix A table of salutations that may precede an individual’s name to identify social status. Accurate and uniform information is key to exchanging data. The table below is the recommended format for an individuals name prefix. Note: Military abbreviations are provided in Non Department of National Defence writing format as per "The Canadian Style, A Guide to Writing and Editing" published in 1997. Prefix Abbreviation Second Lieutenant 2nd Lieut. Acting Sub-Lieutenant Acting Sub-Lieutenant Able Seaman A.B. Abbot Ab. Archbishop Abp. Admiral Admiral Brigadier-General Brig.-Gen Brother Bro. Base Chief Petty Officer BsCPO Captain Capt. Commander Cmdr. Chief Chief Commodore Commodore Colonel Col. Constable Const. Corporal Cpl. Chief Petty Officer 1st class Chief Petty Officer, 1st class Chief Petty Officer 2nd class Chief Petty Officer, 2nd class Constable Cst. Chief Warrant Officer Chief Warrant Officer Doctor Dr. Bishop (Episcopus) Episc Your Excellency Exc. Father Fr. General Gen. Her Worship Her Worship Her Excellency HerEx His Worship His Worship His Excellency HisEx Honourable Hon. Lieutenant-Commander Lt.-Cmdr Lieutenant-Colonel Lt.-Col Lieutenant-General Lt.-Gen Leading Seaman L.S. Lieutenant Lieut. Monsieur M. Person Name - Prefix Prefix Abbreviation Master Ma. Madam Madam Major Maj. Mayor Mayor Master Corporal Master Corporal Major-General Maj.-Gen Miss Miss Mademoiselle Mlle. Madame Mme. Mister Mr. Mistress Mrs. Ms Ms. Master Seaman M.S. Monsignor Msgr. Monsieur Mssr. Master Mstr Master Warrant Officer Master Warrant Officer Naval Cadet Naval Cadet Officer Cadet Officer Cadet Ordinary Seaman O.S. Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 1st class Petty Officer, 2nd class Petty Officer, 2nd class Professor Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Officer Candidate Guide US Army National Guard
    Officer Candidate Guide May 2011 Officer Candidate Guide US Army National Guard May 2011 Officer Candidate Guide May 2011 Officer Candidate School, Reserve Component Summary. This pamphlet provides a guide for US Army National Guard Officer Candidate School students and cadre. Proponent and exception authority. The proponent of this pamphlet is the Commanding General, US Army Infantry School. The CG, USAIS has the authority to approve exceptions to this pamphlet that are consistent with controlling laws and regulations. The CG, USAIS may delegate this authority, in writing, to a division chief within the proponent agency in the grade of Colonel or the civilian equivalent. Intent. The intent of this pamphlet is to ensure that National Guard OCS Candidates nationwide share one common standard. It facilitates the cross-state and cross-TASS region boundary training of US Army officer candidates. Use of the term “States”. Unless otherwise stated, whenever the term “States” is used, it is referring to the CONUS States, Alaska, Hawaii, the US Virgin Islands, Territory of Guam, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and District of Columbia. Supplementation. Local OCS programs may supplement this document in order to meet the needs of local SOPs and regulations, but they may not substantially modify any policy set forth in this document without written authorization from the proponent. Suggested improvements. Users are invited to send comments and suggested improvements on DA Form 2028 (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) directly to the OCS SME, 200th Regiment, Fort McClellan, Alabama 36205. Distribution. This publication is available in electronic media only and is intended for all Reserve Component OCS cadre and students.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Ranks and Units
    US Military Ranks and Units Modern US Military Ranks The table shows current ranks in the US military service branches, but they can serve as a fair guide throughout the twentieth century. Ranks in foreign military services may vary significantly, even when the same names are used. Many European countries use the rank Field Marshal, for example, which is not used in the United States. Pay Army Air Force Marines Navy and Coast Guard Scale Commissioned Officers General of the ** General of the Air Force Fleet Admiral Army Chief of Naval Operations Army Chief of Commandant of the Air Force Chief of Staff Staff Marine Corps O-10 Commandant of the Coast General Guard General General Admiral O-9 Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Vice Admiral Rear Admiral O-8 Major General Major General Major General (Upper Half) Rear Admiral O-7 Brigadier General Brigadier General Brigadier General (Commodore) O-6 Colonel Colonel Colonel Captain O-5 Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Colonel Commander O-4 Major Major Major Lieutenant Commander O-3 Captain Captain Captain Lieutenant O-2 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant 1st Lieutenant Lieutenant, Junior Grade O-1 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant 2nd Lieutenant Ensign Warrant Officers Master Warrant W-5 Chief Warrant Officer 5 Master Warrant Officer Officer 5 W-4 Warrant Officer 4 Chief Warrant Officer 4 Warrant Officer 4 W-3 Warrant Officer 3 Chief Warrant Officer 3 Warrant Officer 3 W-2 Warrant Officer 2 Chief Warrant Officer 2 Warrant Officer 2 W-1 Warrant Officer 1 Warrant Officer Warrant Officer 1 Blank indicates there is no rank at that pay grade.
    [Show full text]
  • All but War Is Simulation: the Military Entertainment Complex
    1 THEATERS OF WAR: THE MILITARY-ENTERTAINMENT COMPLEX Tim Lenoir and Henry Lowood Stanford University To appear in Jan Lazardzig, Helmar Schramm, Ludger Schwarte, eds., Kunstkammer, Laboratorium, Bühne--Schauplätze des Wissens im 17. Jahrhundert/ Collection, Laboratory, Theater, Berlin; Walter de Gruyter Publishers, 2003 in both German and in English War games are simulations combining game, experiment and performance. The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) has been the primary proponent of war game design since the 1950s. Yet, commercial game designers produced many of the ideas shaping the design of military simulations, both before and after the advent of computer-based games. By the 1980s, the seeds of a deeper collaboration among military, commercial designers, the entertainment industry, and academic researchers in the development of high-end computer simulations for military training had been planted. They built “distributed interactive simulations” (DIS) such as SIMNET that created virtual theaters of war by linking participants interacting with distributed software or hardware simulators in real time. The simulators themselves presented synthetic environments—virtual worlds—by utilizing advances in computer graphics and virtual reality research. With the rapid development of DIS technology during the 1990s, content and compelling story development became increasingly important. The necessity of realistic scenarios and backstory in military simulations led designers to build databases of historical, geographic and physical data, reconsider the role of synthetic agents in their simulations and consult with game design and entertainment talents for the latest word on narrative and performance. Even when this has not been the intention of their designers and sponsors, military simulations have been deeply embedded in commercial forms of entertainment, for example, by providing content and technology deployed in computer and video games.
    [Show full text]
  • Equivalent Ranks of the British Services and U.S. Air Force
    EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Commissioned Ranks Marshal of the Admiral of the Fleet Field Marshal Royal Air Force Command General of the Air Force Admiral Air Chief Marshal General General Vice Admiral Air Marshal Lieutenant General Lieutenant General Rear Admiral Air Vice Marshal Major General Major General Commodore Brigadier Air Commodore Brigadier General Colonel Captain Colonel Group Captain Commander Lieutenant Colonel Wing Commander Lieutenant Colonel Lieutenant Squadron Leader Commander Major Major Lieutenant Captain Flight Lieutenant Captain EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT First Lieutenant Sub Lieutenant Lieutenant Flying Officer Second Lieutenant Midshipman Second Lieutenant Pilot Officer Notes: 1. Five-Star Ranks have been phased out in the British Services. The Five-Star ranks in the U.S. Services are reserved for wartime only. 2. The rank of Midshipman in the Royal Navy is junior to the equivalent Army and RAF ranks. EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S. AIR FORCE RoyalT Air RoyalT NavyT ArmyT T UST Air ForceT ForceT Non-commissioned Ranks Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Warrant Officer Class 1 (RSM) Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force Warrant Officer Class 2b (RQSM) Chief Command Master Sergeant Warrant Officer Class 2a Chief Master Sergeant Chief Petty Officer Staff Sergeant Flight Sergeant First Senior Master Sergeant Chief Technician Senior Master Sergeant Petty Officer Sergeant Sergeant First Master Sergeant EQUIVALENT RANKS OF THE BRITISH SERVICES AND U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Leadership in the Military Organization in the Context of the Current Military Phenomenon
    International Conference KNOWLEDGE-BASED ORGANIZATION Vol. XXIV No 1 2018 LEADERSHIP IN THE MILITARY ORGANIZATION IN THE CONTEXT OF THE CURRENT MILITARY PHENOMENON Laurențiu Mihail GRIGORE “Nicolae Bălcescu” Land Forces Academy Sibiu, Romania [email protected] Abstract: Military action is a specific type of human action which takes place in a particular physical, geographic and psychological environment. In this article we refer to the specific conditions in which military leadership is running. Also, we refer to the qualities of the military leader. Keywords: leadership, military organization, military phenomenon, leader, commander 1. Introduction defined and guided situation, courtesy of Human society has evolved and developed communication processes, to achieve a over the course of history due to social, determined goal or purposes." (1) economic, and organizational-political T.M. Newcomb, R.H. Turner and P.E. factors. Man as a social being participates Converse (1965) define leadership as "a intensely and directly in the activity of the relationship of facilitating roles" (2) in community to which he belongs and in order to achieve the goals. which he fulfills a certain role and holds a By interpreting these two definitions in a certain status. Man thinks, works, creates, creative manner, it results in respect to consumes, fights, etc., having a clearly leadership: defined position in the hierarchical structure - leadership is done by a person who of the society belonging to. Somewhere at has the role of leader and has the mission to the top of the pyramid, there is someone lead the group in achieving the set goal; who is leading, by taking a number of - not all the actions undertaken by the actions, which are more or less leader of the group are included in the scientifically grounded.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of Remarks Section
    July 30, 2020 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks E701 EXTENSIONS OF REMARKS PERSONAL EXPLANATION significant and positive impact on the Brazos COVID–19 pandemic. Recently, the House Valley during its 100–year history. passed H.R. 2, the Moving Forward Act, a HON. PETE OLSON I have requested the United States flag be comprehensive package that invests more OF TEXAS flown over our Nation’s Capitol to recognize than $1.5 trillion in America’s transportation IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES this significant milestone and their contribu- and infrastructure over the next five years. tions to our veterans and to our community. This includes nearly $7 billion for Washington Thursday, July 30, 2020 As I close today, I urge all Americans to state’s transportation network. The Moving Mr. OLSON. Madam Speaker, due to a per- continue praying for our country, for our vet- Forward Act is part of a long-term vision to put sonal matter, I was unable to make votes on erans, and for our military men and women Americans back to work, jumpstart the econ- Monday, July 27th. Had I been present, I who protect us and for our first responders omy and make the transportation network would have voted ‘‘YEA’’ on Rollcall No. 167. who keep us safe at home. smarter, safer and greener. f f Although H.R. 2 significantly increases sur- face transportation funding, it falls short in PERSONAL EXPLANATION RECOGNIZING THE CAREER OF helping the nation’s medium-sized cities, like BULLHEAD CITY CHIEF OF PO- Mountlake Terrace, Lynnwood and Oak Har- HON.
    [Show full text]