An Interview with Chaia Heller

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

An Interview with Chaia Heller The Institute for Anarchist Studies Chaia Heller is one of the most analogous to but directly ho exciting feminist and Utopian Ecology, Desire mologous to the dialectic be intellectuals currently writing tween need and desire. Fall 1999 in English. In her first major and Vol. 3 No. 2 work, Ecology of Everyday I think that desire is need be Life: Rethinking the Desire for coming increasingly free. It is Nature, Chaia Heller extends Revolution: the subject becoming increas a feminist critique of roman ingly free from the realm of tic love to an exploration of An Interview necessity, as necessity becomes alienated perceptions of na increasingly subjective. For ex ture. Heller challenges us to ample, the need for food be rethink the epistemological with comes the conscious, subjective basis of our desire for a better desire for a kind of food. This world with one of the most Chaia Heller is a dialectic that marks both challenging and considered by Rebecca DeWitt history and natural history. And examinations of the dialectic so I think that there is a very of desire and need since Murray Bookchin's 1967 compelling relationship between the dialectic of essay of the same name. Heller brings the subject freedom and necessity and desire and need, which into the forefront of considerations for social inspired Bookchin to write a very important essay change, rescuing it from the esoteric background in the 60's called "Desire and Need." of social theory. Any movement toward freedom will have to figure I spoke with Chaia about her book, her work, and out a way to talk about desire and not just need. I her experience as a radical theorist in August 1999. see this as part of evolutionary and revolutionary thinking. I think there was this potential as we ~ Rebecca DeWitt moved from the Old Left to the New Left but that the advance will only become fulfilled when we can truly understand this historical dialectic between freedom and necessity. It is not sufficient to only have peoples' physical material needs met, and it is certainly not acceptable for that to happen within Y f hat was it like to write this book, struggle centralized authoritarian state structures. We must with these complicated social and political issues, not only figure out how to meet peoples' material and try to propose solutions within the current po needs but also figure out a way to qualitatively trans litical climate? form the way we meet those needs that will be in creasingly subjective and conscious and free. The Writing is the way I deal with the fact that I live in way to do that is to create a political structure that a counter-revolutionary time. It has been an im encourages the greatest degree of social complex portant way for me to do that and helps me keep ity, participation, and that structure would be direct engaged, inspired and focused on revolutionary democracy. ideas and work. I've always been in love with ideas, and thinking about Utopian or revolutionary ideas gives me a sense of hopefulness and possibilities J[ ou state that "focusing solely on need and sur because you can often think beyond what you can vival naturalizes conditions of ecological scarcity do in a particular historical moment. So, I get a lot and destruction... When we lose sight of the quali of satisfaction and joy out of thinking beyond "what tative dimensions of life, we lose the ability to con is given" to "what ought to be." trast the world that is to the world that ought to be." Implicit in this statement is the idea that we can change our society and therefore have no rea J[ ou articulate a revolutionary project in which son to settle for the unjust society we currently have. need (the realm of necessity) must become desire, Many political trends have turned away from the where need is transcended by focusing on our col Utopian approach. Why is it important to maintain lective desire for a better way of life. You state a Utopian ideal? that this desire can and must become politicized. How does desire become politicized? This goes back to how do you cope with life in a counter-revolutionary time. Utopia can imply some I think that it entails a dialectic. The dialectic of sort of evolutionary vision and progress, and im natural evolution is this movement towards ever plies not just change but some qualitative progres greater levels of consciousness, freedom, subjec sion; a shift from "what is" to "what ought to be." tivity. And, I think that this dialectic is not just continued on page 6 In This Issue: PERSPECTIVES Grant Awards and Updates page 3 ON ANARCHIST What's Happening page 4 IAS Development page 10 THEORY Fall 1999, Vol. 3, No, 2 IAS Update Newsletter of thei&titute In these politically uncertain times we need to con for Anarchist Studies an anarchist analysis. (Read more about our June tinue to gather strength by exploring new ideas and 1999 grant awards on page 3). Also, we were the potential for change. At the IAS we have been Editorial Committee: excited to receive a finished copy of Mark Bonhert Rebecca DeWitt, Chuck Morse, doing just that and there are quite a few things to and Richard Curtis' project, Passionate and Dan Eva Garcia report. gerous: Conversations with Midwestern Anti- Authoritarians and Anarchists. (See page 3 to I want to first mention a very important organiza Grammatical .Partisans: read more about the project and find out how to tional change. This June the IAS board voted to Hamish Alcorn, Andrew Bellware, obtain a copy.) make me the General Director of IAS. I am very Paul Glavin, Qayyum Johnson excited to take on this role and I am inspired by the We are also in the middle of our 1999 fundraising challenges this position presents and the contribu campaign, whose success will allow us to con Subscription Rates tions I can make to the growth of the IAS. Chuck tinue awarding grants, publishing Perspectives, (Two issues per year) Morse (the founder of the IAS) has held this posi and add $10,000 to the IAS endowment We will I A S D o n o r s - F r e e tion since the organization's inception more than be able to add $10,000 to the endowment thanks I n d i v i d u a l s - $ 5 three years ago. It was agreed that this administra Institutions • - ' ' *- $10 to a combination of two sources: last November tive change would help bring new perspectives to Bulk Subs (25 Copies) - $25 1998, a generous IAS supporter pledged to do bear on the direction of the IAS and also help Chuck nate $8000 to our endowment upon the success devote more time to fundraising and other IAS ac of the our 1999 fundraising campaign and we tivities. Chuck will, of course, continue as a mem will add $2000 to that amount, bringing the total Institute/or Anarchist Studies) ber of the IAS administrative staff, co-editor of the to $10,000 (see page 11 for more details). We newsletter, and a member of the board. have set big goals for ourselves this year but we tives do notnecessarily represenithe views anticipate success with the generous help of long We have also been working to develop the prin of the IAS as a whole. The material in this time supporters, new friends and those who have ciples and structure of the IAS. For the last six already donated. newsletter is © the Institute for Anarchist months three local board members met regularly Studies. to address IAS developmental issues. We have fo Perrenial Books has changed their name but not *** > cused on reevaluating our grant priorities, board their commitment to the IAS and radical litera -IAS Board of Directors: , development and finances in light of the current ture. Perennial has become Raven Used Books Paula Emery, John Petrovato, weakness of radical theory and politics. We feel (located in Amherst, Massachusetts) and continue Dan Chodorkoff, Cindy Milstein, the main purpose of the IAS is to cultivate and help to help the IAS by making forty-eight titles avail Michelle Matisons, Maura Dillon, > re-build a radical movement and we are working able to IAS donors (please see the insert , Paul Glavin, Chuck Morse to refine our principles and strategies accordingly. enclosed in this issue for a listing of the excep In addition, the board passed a proposal to tional books they are offering). Administrative Staff: strengthen the percentage of local board members Chuck Morse, Eva Garcia based in New York City so that there will be more The IAS has been in existence for three and a .Rebecca DeWitt of a support network and radical milieu around the half years, we have given away $17,000 to IAS headquarters in. We have also set ourselves eightteen projects, we have published six issues General Director: , >,^ the task of rewriting the brochure and translating of Perspectives (including this issue), and we are Rebecca DeWitt it into several languages. Please see page 10 for a settling in our new home in NYC. What is espe detailed report of our endeavors over the last six cially encouraging is that the IAS has taken root ' *** months. in the widespread anarchist and radical commu , Institute for Anarchist Studies nity and is appreciated by activists and writers P.O. Box 1664 The IAS continues to award grants to exciting both nationally and internationally. All of these Peter Stuyvesant Station projects and see the results of previous grant awards.
Recommended publications
  • Estudios De Historia Moderna Y Contemporánea De México 49 (2015) 33-53
    33 Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México 49 (2015) 33-53 Disponible en www.sciencedirect.com Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México www.historicas.unam.mx/publicaciones/revistas/moderna/moderna.html Artículo original “… El magonismo no existe”: Ricardo Flores Magón “Magonism does not exist”: Ricardo Flores Magón Marco Antonio Samaniego López Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, México INFORMACIÓN DEL ARTÍCULO RESUMEN Historia del artículo: Recibido el 27 de agosto de 2014 El artículo demuestra que los anarquistas del Partido Liberal Mexica- Aceptado el 1 de diciembre de 2014 no no se identificaban ni querían ser llamados “magonistas”, por ser una forma de denominarlos que era contraria a su ideología. Ricardo Palabras clave: Flores Magón manifestó claramente que el uso de dicho término era Partido Liberal Mexicano para confundir al pueblo mexicano y compararlos con otros ismos a Anarquismo los que denostaban. No querían personalismos, ni autoridades, ni je- Liberales fes, debido a que los intereses personales se sobreponen siempre a Magonismo los colectivos. De igual forma, el uso de “magonismo” surge por par- Regeneración Estados Unidos te de las autoridades federales en su afán persecutorio. Posterior- Líderes mente, la historiografía, en dos grandes líneas, ha utilizado dicho Historiografía término para explicar la participación de los miembros del PLM; sin Revolución Mexicana embargo, es una forma que contradice la ideología de quienes pre- Estado posrevolucionario tenden describir. Derechos Reservados © 2015 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas. Este es un artículo de acceso abierto distribuido bajo los términos de la Licencia Creative Commons CC BY-NC-ND 4.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Vínculos Entre Los Zapatistas Y Los Magonistas Durante La Revolución Mexicana
    Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana ISSN: 1315-5216 ISSN: 2477-9555 [email protected] Universidad del Zulia Venezuela Vínculos entre los zapatistas y los magonistas durante la Revolución Mexicana TREJO MUÑOZ, Rubén Vínculos entre los zapatistas y los magonistas durante la Revolución Mexicana Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana, vol. 25, núm. 90, 2020 Universidad del Zulia, Venezuela Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=27965038006 PDF generado a partir de XML-JATS4R por Redalyc Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto Rubén TREJO MUÑOZ. Vínculos entre los zapatistas y los magonistas durante la Revolución Mexicana ARTÍCULOS Vínculos entre los zapatistas y los magonistas durante la Revolución Mexicana Rubén TREJO MUÑOZ Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, México id=27965038006 [email protected] Recepción: 02 Febrero 2020 Aprobación: 30 Abril 2020 Resumen: Recuperar la memoria histórica de las dos tendencias radicales y anticapitalistas de la Revolución Mexicana desarrollada entre 1910 y 1920. El presente texto forma parte de una investigación en curso sobre los vínculos entre el zapatismo y el magonismo durante la Revolución Mexicana. Exponemos únicamente dos episodios que muestran esa colaboración. El primero refiere la participación de Ángel Barrios, magonista y zapatista destacado, en la lucha tanto del PLM como del Ejército Libertador del Sur. El segundo, es la narración de la visita que hace el magonista José Guerra a Emiliano Zapata en 1913. Palabras clave: Magonismo, zapatismo, Revolucion Mexicana, Tierra y Libertad. Abstract: Recovering the historical memory of the two radical and anticapitalistic tendencies in the 1910-1920 Mexican Revolution.
    [Show full text]
  • @ Copyrighted by Ward Sloan Albro, Iii 1967
    Ricardo Flores Magón and the Liberal Party: an inquiry into the origins of the Mexican revolution of 1910 Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Albro, Ward S. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 11:00:40 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565157 @ COPYRIGHTED BY WARD SLOAN ALBRO, III 1967 RICARDO FLORES MAGON AND THE LIBERAL PARTY: AN INQUIRY INTO THE ORIGINS OF THE MEXICAN REVOLUTION OF 1910 by Ward Sloan Albro, III A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 19 6 7 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by Ward Sloan Albro. Ill____________________________ entitled ftir.ardo Flores Maron and the Liberal Party: An Inquiry into the Origins of the Mexican Revolution of 1910 be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy_________________________________ After inspection of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* f + 6 7 Q/Aa. 1/ / 9&7 /?& .V, pa z Z *This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination.
    [Show full text]
  • TIEMPO MUERTO Number 5A| Year 2018
    TIEMPO MUERTO Number 5a| Year 2018 1 TIEMPO MUERTO #5 INDEX 3 EDITOr’s nOTE TO TIEMPO MUERTO 5 Juan Pablo Macías 5 CHICOMEXOCHITL & THE ORIGIN OF CORN IN THE NAHUA ORAL TRADITION OF THE HUASTecA MAIZE AND Anuschka van´t Hooft (2008) 9 THE PeOPLE OF LA HUASTecA DO NOT ANARCHISM – CONCEIVE LIFE AWAY FROM THE MILPA Alfredo Zepeda (2012) 11 MAIZE & COMMUNALITY A CORRELATION Kiado Cruz (2014) 15 COMMUNITY & COMMUNALITY OF THOUGHT, Floriberto Díaz Gómez (2004) 19 THE INDIAN & THE INDIGENOUS IN THE MAGÓNIST ANARCHISM ORDER AND Benjamín Maldonado Alvarado (2000) 27 FeRNANDO PALOMAREZ, MAYO INDIAN. LIBERTY ON LIBERTARIAN EPISTLES & OTHER TEXTS. Alfonso Torúa Cienfuegos (2016) 31 MAGÓNISM & INDIGENOUS MOVEMENT THE EXTENSION Juan Carlos Beas and Manuel Ballesteros (1986) 43 THE MeXICAN ReVOLUTION Voltairine de Cleyre (1911) TIEMPO MUERTO Authors Graphic project Publisher Thanks to #5a | 2015 Anuschka van´t Hooft, Alfredo Zepeda, Brice Delarue Zirkumflex WORD+MOIST PRESS Bruna e Matteo Viglietta, Eva Brioschi, Kiado Cruz, Floriberto Díaz Gómez, www.zirkumflex.com Manuela Galliano, Marco Scotini, Andris Editor | Editorship Benjamín Maldonado Alvarado, Printed in May 2018, China Brinkmanis, Shuai Yin, Paolo Caffoni, Juan Pablo Macías Alfonso Torúa Cienfuegos, Juan Carlos Visual content Chen Jianxin, Liu Pei, Brice Delarue, Beas, Manuel Ballesteros, Plotino Juan Pablo Macías stills from “Museum Produced by Alessandra Poggianti, Rodrigo Villasmil, Rhodakanaty, Julio López Chávez, pieces, a 6000 year-old corn fossil, two Yinchuan Biennale Yu Hsiao-hwei, Evelyne Jouanno, Hou Emiliano Zapata, Voltairine de Cleyre agronomists and a geneticist,” 2018 Hanru, Pengpeng Wang, Alberto Paredes With the support of Sánchez, Abel Muñoz Orozco, Abel Gil- Translations Cover Collezione La Gaia Muñoz, José Regalado, Kiado Cruz, Lucia Rodrigo Villasmil, Yu Hsiao-hwei Juan Pablo Macías “Teocintle, the Giardino e Chico Bacci.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.“… El Magonismo No Existe”: Ricardo Flores Magón
    Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México ISSN: 0185-2620 [email protected] Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México México Samaniego López, Marco Antonio “… El magonismo no existe”: Ricardo Flores Magón Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México, núm. 49, enero-junio, 2015, pp. 33-53 Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México Distrito Federal, México Disponible en: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=94142709003 Cómo citar el artículo Número completo Sistema de Información Científica Más información del artículo Red de Revistas Científicas de América Latina, el Caribe, España y Portugal Página de la revista en redalyc.org Proyecto académico sin fines de lucro, desarrollado bajo la iniciativa de acceso abierto 33 Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México 49 (2015) 33-53 Disponible en www.sciencedirect.com Estudios de Historia Moderna y Contemporánea de México www.historicas.unam.mx/publicaciones/revistas/moderna/moderna.html Artículo original “… El magonismo no existe”: Ricardo Flores Magón “Magonism does not exist”: Ricardo Flores Magón Marco Antonio Samaniego López Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Instituto de Investigaciones Históricas, México INFORMACIÓN DEL ARTÍCULO RESUMEN Historia del artículo: Recibido el 27 de agosto de 2014 El artículo demuestra que los anarquistas del Partido Liberal Mexica- Aceptado el 1 de diciembre de 2014 no no se identificaban ni querían ser llamados “magonistas”, por ser una forma de denominarlos que era contraria a su ideología. Ricardo Palabras clave: Flores Magón manifestó claramente que el uso de dicho término era Partido Liberal Mexicano para confundir al pueblo mexicano y compararlos con otros ismos a Anarquismo los que denostaban.
    [Show full text]
  • Vivir Y Pensar La Construcción De La Sociedad Anarquista Desde La Realidad Mesoamericana, Ayer Y Hoy*
    Pedagogía ENSAYO RDP Revista Digital de Posgrado RDP Revista Digital de Posgrado Vivir y pensar la construcción de la sociedad anarquista desde la realidad mesoamericana, ayer y hoy* Living and thinking about the construction of anarchist society from the Mesoamerican reality, yesterday and today Benjamín Maldonado Alvarado Programa de Posgrado de Pedagogía Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México En recuerdo de Omar Cortés y Chantal López Resumen Abstract La vida comunal de los pueblos mesoamericanos ha sido The communal life of the Mesoamerican communities has la base de la resistencia indígena comunitaria frente al co- been the historical basis of indigenous resistance against Span- lonialismo español y luego frente al mexicano. Este modo ish colonialism and then against Mexican colonialism. This de vida y de pensar fue considerado por los magonistas, en way of life and mentality was considered by the magonistas in la década de 1910, como la poderosa experiencia histórica the 1910s as the powerful historical experience that would be que sería la base para la reconstrucción libre de la sociedad the basis for the free reconstruction of society after the triumph mexicana, después del triunfo de la corriente anarquista de of the anarchist sector in the Mexican revolution that they la revolución que impulsaban desde el exilio en Estados Uni- organized in exile from the United States. But they did not dos; pero no valoraron a la comunalidad como una forma de value communality as a form of resistance to achieve the lib- resistencia para liberarse del colonialismo capitalista, porque eration of capitalist colonialism, because they supposed dead suponían muerto un modo de vida que hoy sigue vivo en a way of life that is still alive today in communities of places comunidades de estados como Oaxaca.
    [Show full text]
  • Magón, Ricardo Flores (1874–1922) and the Magonistas 2161
    International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest, ed. Immanuel Ness, Blackwell Publishing, 2009, pp. 2161–2163 Magón, Ricardo Flores (1874–1922) and the Magonistas 2161 Magón, Ricardo Flores (1874–1922) and the Magonistas Jens Kastner Magonism designates a social movement as well as a certain school of libertarian theory, named after the Mexican anarchist Ricardo Flores Magón. The organizational core of Magonism was the Partido Liberal de México (Liberal Party of Mexico, PLM), founded in the US on Septem- ber 5, 1905 in St. Louis, Missouri. Although the Magonists took their public discourse from liber- alism, the group embraced an anarchist political philosophy and strategy. The Magonists were one of the most influential radical currents during the Mexican Revolution (1910–21). Ricardo Flores Magón was born in San Antonio Eloxochitlán on September 16, 1874 in Oaxaca, Mexico. If the area from which he came was not the center of his activities, it nonetheless played a role in forming his thoughts and actions. The democratic, non-hierarchic organizational forms of political and everyday life in Oaxaca’s indigenous communities exerted an enormous influence on Magón’s ideas and philosophy. Moreover, his work and political activism were influenced by the works of the nineteenth- century anarchists Pierre-Joseph Proudhon, Peter Kropotkin, and Mikhail Bakunin as well as by anarchist contemporaries such as Errico Malatesta, Florencio Bazora, Emma Goldman, and Elisée Reclus. These anarchist influences were crucial for the transformation of Magón’s International Encyclopedia of Revolution and Protest, ed. Immanuel Ness, Blackwell Publishing, 2009, pp. 2161–2163 2162 Magón, Ricardo Flores (1874–1922) and the Magonistas political thinking from radical reformism into rev- addressed by revolutionary action, as expropria- olutionary anarchism.
    [Show full text]
  • Magonismo: an Overview
    The Anarchist Library (Mirror) Anti-Copyright Magonismo: An Overview Chuck Morse Chuck Morse Magonismo: An Overview 2004 Retrieved on September 15, 2015 from web.archive.org Published in New Formulation, Vol. 2, No. 2. usa.anarchistlibraries.net 2004 Contents The Magonist Challenge .............. 6 1906 – 1908: Peak .................. 7 Activity ........................ 9 Decline: 1911–1922 . 12 Outcomes ....................... 13 Magonismo Today? . 16 3 more in common with a Marxist-Leninist vanguard party than the decentralized forms commonly associated with anarchism. Finally, the Magonists, like so many anarchists, held the naïve belief that social discontent merely needed to be sparked in or- der to erupt into a revolutionary explosion, and this short-cut to the creation of a genuinely informed and empowered revo- lutionary movement is deeply untenable. Social change is far more complex than that and such a perspective accords far too much importance to the acts of small groups and individuals. Although anarchists should welcome the growing literature on Magonism and avail ourselves of the opportunity to study the movement deeply, no towering heroes emerge from the legacy that the Magonists have bequeathed to us. It is impera- tive that we explore the contributions of our predecessors and also imperative that we remember that the foundations of a truly revolutionary politics for the Americas have yet to be fashioned. 17 ized the discourse of the Mexican Revolution by showing “that Ricardo Flores Magón is one of the most important anar- it was not enough to conserve the Constitution of 1857 and the chists in the history of the Americas. The movement he led ideas of the Reform, [but] that it was necessary to take up the and inspired shook the Mexican state in the early 20th century social question…This demand, the points that they stressed to and helped lay the foundations for the Mexican revolution of resolve [this question] and the actions that they carried out in 1910.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of Mexican Labor – Review Essays
    El Colegio de Mexico and Instituto de Investigaciones de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo Social, 1995. 179 pages. Table. In this book professor Zapata presents an analysis of the impact of the process of economic adjustment (1982-1987) and of industrial restructuring (1988-1993) on Mexican unions, looking in particular at the context of the transition from the model of import substitution industrialization to the opening of the Mexican market to foreign competition. The book's six chapters are: Chapter I, "Sindicalismo en Mexico"; Chapter II "Mercados de trabajo, remuneraciones y empleo en la decada de los ochenta,"; Chapter III, "Politicas laborales y restructuracion economica,"; Chapter IV, "El conflicto laboral: ?arma de lucha o mecanismo de transaccion?; Chapter V "El debate sobre la reforma a la Ley Federal del Trabajo (1989-1992); Chapter VI "Sindicalismo y regimen corporativo." Fernando Zertuche Munoz. Ricardo Flores Magon. El Sueno Alternativo. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Economica, 1995. Photographs. Bibliography. 257 pages. Fernando Zertuche is the author of several studies of Mexican political and intellectual figures. For this book Zertuche Munoz has written a 50-page biography of Ricardo Flores Magon and collected a number of his most important essays, manifestos, and letters. There is also a short bibliography of the major workers on Flores Magon. II – Bibliography of Mexican labor – review essays. Maria Cristina Bayon. El sindicalismo automotriz mexicano frente a un nuevo escenario: una perspective desde los liderazgos. Mexico: Facultad Latinoamricana de Ciencias Sociales (FLACSO) and Juan Pablos Editor, 1997. 207 pages. Notes, bibliography. Maria Cristina Bayon's book represents an important contribution both to the study of the automobile industry and to the more general discussion of the nature of Mexican labor unions.
    [Show full text]
  • La Botz on Hodges, 'Mexican Anarchism After the Revolution'
    H-LatAm La Botz on Hodges, 'Mexican Anarchism after the Revolution' Review published on Friday, January 31, 1997 Donald C. Hodges. Mexican Anarchism after the Revolution. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1995. xiv + 251 pp. $17.95 (paper), ISBN 978-0-292-73097-7; $40.00 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-292-73093-9. Reviewed by Dan La Botz (University of Cincinnati) Published on H-LatAm (January, 1997) Donald C. Hodges is the author of several books on the politics of Mexico and Nicaragua, founding editor of Social Theory and Practice, and professor of philosophy and political science at Florida State University. Many readers will have read several years ago Hodges's and Ross Gandy's interesting book Mexico 1910-1982: Reform or Revolution?. Mexican Anarchism after the Revolution claims to be a history of anarchism in contemporary Mexico. But, in reality, this book is really two things. The first half of the book is a biography of Ruben Jaramillo and a political history of his radical movement in Morelos from the 1930s to the 1960s. The second half of Hodges's book is a fundamentally confused and confusing essay on Mexican political theory and leftist organizations. This review will take up these two parts of the book in that order. What is new, interesting, and valuable in this book is Hodges's account of Ruben Jaramillo's peasant movement in the state of Morelos. Using interviews with participants and previously unpublished documents, Hodges has written an important chapter in Mexican social history and political movements. The story is a fascinating one that goes back to the beginning of the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Magonismo: an Overview
    Magonismo: An Overview Chuck Morse 2004 Contents The Magonist Challenge ................................. 3 1906 – 1908: Peak ..................................... 4 Activity ........................................... 5 Decline: 1911–1922 .................................... 6 Outcomes .......................................... 7 Magonismo Today? .................................... 9 2 Ricardo Flores Magón is one of the most important anarchists in the history of the Americas. The movement he led and inspired shook the Mexican state in the early20th century and helped lay the foundations for the Mexican revolution of 1910. He was also a participant in radical movements in the United States and a security concern that reached the highest levels of the U.S. government. The literature on Magón and the Magonists (as his comrades were known) has expanded con- siderably in recent decades and it is now possible to develop a fuller appreciation of the move- ment than at any previous time. One can explore the personal dilemmas of Magón and his co- conspirators through various scholarly biographies, read about the Magonists’ impact on specific regions of the United States and Mexico, or study Magonist contributions to Mexican radicalism generally.1 Anarchists should welcome this not only because our predecessors are finally receiving the historical recognition that they deserve but also because we now have the resources necessary to undertake a deep confrontation with the Magonist legacy. It is now possible to develop a very clear idea of how the Magonists tried to create an anarchist revolution, the consequences their activity yielded, as well as determine whether there are aspects of their activity that we should emulate today. The books reviewed here are particularly useful. El magonismo: historia de una pasión liber- taria, 1900–1922 (Magonism: History of a Libertarian Passion, 1900–1922) by Salvador Hernández Padilla studies the entire history of Magonism from its emergence at the turn of the century to its disappearance from the political scene in the 1920s.
    [Show full text]
  • MEXICAN LABOR BIBLIOGRAPHY Introduction
    November 20, 2002 MEXICAN LABOR BIBLIOGRAPHY By Dan La Botz [This bibliography is a work in progress.] Table of Contents: Introduction I – Bibliography of Mexican Labor, short entries II – Bibliography of Mexican Labor, review essays (longer reviews) III – Bibliography of Mexican Oil Industry and Unions IV – Bibliography of Mexican Rural Workers and Indigenous People V – Bibliography of Mexican Politics VI – Bibliography of Archives and Historiography Introduction I originally wrote many of these notes, annotations and reviews for Mexican Labor News and Analysis, an electronic newsletter about Mexican workers and labor unions that I have edited for the last several years. (See MLNA at: http://www.ueinternational.org/ Now I have put these notes and reviews together to comprise an annotated bibliography of books in English and Spanish dealing mostly with the modern Mexican labor movement, that is since the mid-nineteenth century. This bibliography includes historical and social science studies of the working class and labor unions, and labor leaders' biographies. There are also related books on social movements and politics. In addition, because the subject matter is often closely related, I have included a number of books dealing with economic history and studies of specific industries. Because of their importance to the labor movement, this bibliography also includes many books on the history of the Mexican anarchist, socialist, and communist movements, and related biographies. Finally, because of the intertwined history of the Mexican Revolution and Mexican labor organizations, I have also included many of the important books dealing with the Mexican Revolution. A bibliography such as this is necessary for several reasons.
    [Show full text]