DOCSLIB.ORG

An Abstract of the Thesis Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jennifer Motley for the degree of Master of Science in Marine Resource Management presented on March 22, 2017. Title: Local and Regional Patterns in Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) Communities Along an Upwelling-Productivity Gradient in Oregon Estuaries, USA Abstract approved: ______________________________________________________ Fiona Tomas Nash Sally D. Hacker In this thesis, I investigate the organization of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) and mesograzer communities across local and regional scales in three upwelling- influenced estuaries located along the Oregon coast, USA. Eelgrass ecosystems are an important source of primary production in estuarine systems, providing numerous ecosystem services, including nursery habitat for commercial fish, water quality improvement, and sediment stabilization. Community structure in eelgrass systems, i.e., the diversity, abundance, and composition of primary and secondary consumers, is influenced by a combination of local to regional scale variability in environmental and biotic factors. Thus, an important consideration in the management of these systems is to understand the organization of community structure across spatiotemporal scale and the implications for top-down (consumer) versus bottom-up (resource) control. In upwelling-influenced estuaries of the Pacific Northwest coast of the United States, eelgrass systems are exposed to latitudinal variability in oceanographic inputs, but the degree to which these regional effects versus local effects organize eelgrass community structure is poorly understood. Here I investigate the relationship between primary producers (eelgrass, ulvoid macroalgae, and epiphytes), epifauna mesograzers, and fish predators within and across three estuaries located on the Oregon Coast, USA (Netarts Bay, Yaquina Bay, and Coos Bay). Specifically, I asked: 1) What is the relative importance of local (within estuary) versus regional (across estuaries) scale patterns to eelgrass community structure (i.e., primary producers, epifaunal mesograzers, and fishes) in upwelling-influenced estuaries in Oregon?, 2) What is the potential role of regional oceanography versus trophic interactions in regulating eelgrass community structure, and is this dependent on spatial scale?, and 3) What are the management implications for eelgrass communities when regional and local scales are considered? I found that while local effects were important, regional (estuary) scale patterns strongly influenced community structure in eelgrass communities, providing support that regional oceanographic bottom-up forcing dominates eelgrass communities. Additionally, I found evidence for top-down control by the opisthobranch Phyllaplysia taylori on primary producers at one site within Netarts Bay. I suggest that eelgrass beds in these estuaries are mostly bottom-up systems, and further investigations should focus on quantifying the mechanistic relationship between mesograzers and primary producers at local to regional scales. ©Copyright by Jennifer Motley March 22, 2017 All Rights Reserved Local and Regional Patterns in Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) Communities Along an Upwelling- Productivity Gradient in Oregon Estuaries, USA by Jennifer Motley A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented March 22, 2017 Commencement June 2018 Master of Science thesis of Jennifer Motley presented on March 22, 2017 APPROVED: Co-Major Professor, representing Marine Resource Management Co-Major Professor, representing Marine Resource Management Dean of the College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request. Jennifer Motley, Author ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my co-advisors, Dr. Fiona Tomas Nash and Dr. Sally Hacker, for providing me with support throughout this process that has helped me develop into an ecologist. In particular, funding from Dr. Tomas Nash has made my experience possible. Additionally, her dedication to this work, creativity, and brilliance as an ecologist has been both an inspiration and an example to me. Dr. Hacker’s clarity of mind has helped me wrap my head around big ecological questions, her input has organized this project, and her help in the writing stages has been invaluable. Thank you also to Dr. Ted DeWitt, who has provided invaluable guidance for me in framing my research. In addition, thank you to Dr. Kelly Riedinger for embracing this project and providing advice and encouragement. In addition, Dr. Margot Hessing-Lewis, Dr. Tony D’Andrea, and C. Kaminksy provided initial insight I was able to run with early on in this project. I am especially grateful to J. Henderson, who provided me with endless local knowledge, logistical help, and assistance in the field throughout the field season. Thank you to R. Klopfenstein, M. Mason, G. Hernan, S. Detwiler, and E. Hayduk for helping me complete fieldwork during those early, early mornings. F. Conway and R. Allan provided unwavering support, encouragement, and perspective – and were there to remind me of life outside of graduate school. Thank you to L. Hartline for her help in tying up the loose ends and making life easier. My MRM cohort and the MRM program was a source of support, fun, and adventure that made graduate school a better experience. Thank you to my housemates for being an excellent support network and all-around great company. Finally, special thanks to my husband, E. Hayduk, for selflessly taking on the additional roles of field technician, life coach, editor, cook, and dishwasher. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 Chapter 1: General Introduction.…………..……………………………………… 1 2 Chapter 2: Evidence That Regional Effects Dominate Eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) and Mesograzer Community Structure in Upwelling-Influenced Estuaries.……… 6 2.1 Abstract………………………………………………….……………………..7 2.2 Introduction…………………………………………………………..………...9 2.3 Methods…………………………………………………………………….…14 2.3.1 Study Sites…….………………………………………………………...14 2.3.2 Observational field surveys……………………………………………..15 2.3.3 Sample processing…………………..……………..……………………16 2.3.4 Statistical analyses………………………………………………………17 2.4 Results……………………………………………………………...…………18 2.4.1 Patterns of eelgrass, macroalgae, and epiphytes..………….…………..18 2.4.2 Patterns of epifauna and fish…………………………………………...19 2.4.3 Variance components of primary producers, epifauna, and fish…...…..20 2.4.4 Patterns of mesograzer distribution, variance, and composition…….…21 2.4.5 Correlations among eelgrass community variables………………….…22 2.5 Discussion…………………………………………………………………….23 2.5.1 Empirical patterns compared to hypotheses……………………………23 2.5.2 Possible drivers of primary producers at regional and local scales…….24 2.5.3 Relationships between primary and secondary producers……………...25 2.5.4 Evidence for localized mesograzer control of eelgrass community structure…………................................................................................27 2.5.5 Management implications……………………………………………...29 2.6 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………...31 2.7 Tables…...…………………………………………………………………….32 2.8 Figures……………...…………………………………………………………39 3 Chapter 3: General Conclusion ……………………………………………………48 4 Bibliography.…….….…………………………………………………………..…51 5 Appendices…….…………………………………………………………………..65 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Map of study area………………………………………...……………………….40 2. Mean cross-shore and alongshore transport across estuaries………….…………41 3. Patterns of eelgrass, macroalgae, and epiphytes within and across estuaries…....42 4. Patterns of epifauna and fish within and across estuaries..………………………43 5. Variance components of primary producers and macrofauna...………………….44 6. Patterns of mesograzers within and across estuaries..……………………………45 7. Variance components of mesograzers………………………...………………….46 8. Comparison of Phyllaplysia taylori abundance, epiphyte load, and fish abundance..……………………………………………………………..……47 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1.A Estuarine characteristics of Netarts, Yaquina and Coos Bays…………….33 1.B Site locations and local conditions in Netarts, Yaquina, and Coos Bays.…33 2.A Nested ANOVA model results and variance components for primary producers …...……………………………………………………..……….34 2.B Nested ANOVA model results and variance components for epifaunal taxon richness, abundance, and fish abundance………………………………......35 2.C Nested ANOVA model results and variance components for mesograzers..36 3 Pearson’s correlation of eelgrass community variables………………………………………….………………………....37 LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES Figure Page B.1 Temporal patterns of eelgrass, ulvoid macroalgae, and epiphytes across estuaries…………………………………………...………………………....69 B.2 Temporal patterns of taxon richness, epifaunal abundance, and fish abundance across estuaries…………………………………………………….………...70 B.3 Temporal patterns of four most common mesograzers across estuaries….….....71 LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES Table Page A.1 Cumulative abundance of epifauna from dip net sweeps………………………66 A.2 Cumulative abundance of fish from dip net sweeps……...………….………...68 C.1 Cumulative abundance of epifuana from grab samples………………………...72 C.2 Cumulative abundance of fish from cage method……...………………………74 D.1 Tukey’s linear contrasts from significant factors…………...………………….75 E.1 Means of variables across estuaries…………………………………………….96 E.2 Means of variables within estuaries…………………………………………….97
Recommended publications
  • Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Yaquina Estuary, Oregon

    Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Yaquina Estuary, Oregon

    PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE YAQUINA ESTUARY, OREGON Richard J. Callaway MarPoiSol P.O. Box 57 Corvallis, OR 97339 David T. Specht, Project Officer Coastal Ecology Branch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2111 S.E. Marine Science Drive Newport, Oregon 97365-5260 2 (Purchase Order #8B06~NTT A) Submitted August 9, 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Area of Study .................................................................................................................. 1 Estuary Classification.............................................. .......................................... 1 Local Communities ............................................................................................... 7 Physical Setting .................................................................................................... 7 Climate ................................................................................................................. ? Winds ................................................................................................................... 8 Tides .................................................................................................................... 8 Currents .............................................................................................................. 9 Estuarine Dynamics and the Hansen-Rattray Classification Scheme ...............................
  • ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle

    ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle

    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr. Diana L.
  • The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images and Text ©2006 Biomedia ASSOCIATES

    The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images and Text ©2006 Biomedia ASSOCIATES

    The Biology of Seashores - Image Bank Guide All Images And Text ©2006 BioMEDIA ASSOCIATES Shore Types Low tide, sandy beach, clam diggers. Knowing the Low tide, rocky shore, sandstone shelves ,The time and extent of low tides is important for people amount of beach exposed at low tide depends both on who collect intertidal organisms for food. the level the tide will reach, and on the gradient of the beach. Low tide, Salt Point, CA, mixed sandstone and hard Low tide, granite boulders, The geology of intertidal rock boulders. A rocky beach at low tide. Rocks in the areas varies widely. Here, vertical faces of exposure background are about 15 ft. (4 meters) high. are mixed with gentle slopes, providing much variation in rocky intertidal habitat. Split frame, showing low tide and high tide from same view, Salt Point, California. Identical views Low tide, muddy bay, Bodega Bay, California. of a rocky intertidal area at a moderate low tide (left) Bays protected from winds, currents, and waves tend and moderate high tide (right). Tidal variation between to be shallow and muddy as sediments from rivers these two times was about 9 feet (2.7 m). accumulate in the basin. The receding tide leaves mudflats. High tide, Salt Point, mixed sandstone and hard rock boulders. Same beach as previous two slides, Low tide, muddy bay. In some bays, low tides expose note the absence of exposed algae on the rocks. vast areas of mudflats. The sea may recede several kilometers from the shoreline of high tide Tides Low tide, sandy beach.
  • Oregon Parks & Recreation Department

    Oregon Parks & Recreation Department

    Case File: 4-CP-1$ Date Filed: December 17, 2018 Hearing Date: February 25, 2019/Planning Commission PLANNING STAFF REPORT File No. 4-CP-18 A. APPLICANT: Oregon Parks & Recreation Department (OPRD) (Ian Matthews, Authorized Representative) B. REQUEST: The request is to amend the Parks and Recreation Section of the Newport Comprehensive Plan to approve and adopt the master plans for the Agate Beach State Recreation Site, Yaquina Bay State Recreation Site, and South Beach State Park, as outlined in the OPRD South Beach and Beverly Beach Management Units Plan, dated January 201$. C. LOCATION: 3040 NW Oceanview Drive (Agate Beach State Recreation Site), $42 and $46 SW Government Street (Yaquina Bay State Recreation Site), and 5400 South Coast Highway (South Beach State Park). A list of tax lots associated with each park is included in the application materials. D. LOT SIZE: 1 8.5 acres (Agate Beach State Recreation Site), 32.0 acres (Yaquina Bay State Recreation Site), and 498.3 acres (South Beach State Park). E. STAFF REPORT: 1. Report of Fact a. Plan Designations: Public and Shoreland b. Zone Designations: P-2/”Public Parks” c. Surrounding Land Uses: The Agate Beach State Recreation Site is bordered on the north by a condominium development, on the south by the Best Western Agate Beach Inn, to the east by US 101, and by the ocean on the west. It is bisected by Big Creek and Oceanview Drive. The Yaquina Bay State Recreation Site is located on the bluff at the north end of the Yaquina Bay Bridge. It is bordered by single-family residential and commercial development to the north, US 101 to the east, Yaquina Bay to the south and the ocean to the west.
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals

    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals

    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
  • Kelp Forest Monitoring Handbook — Volume 1: Sampling Protocol

    Kelp Forest Monitoring Handbook — Volume 1: Sampling Protocol

    KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL Channel Islands National Park Gary E. Davis David J. Kushner Jennifer M. Mondragon Jeff E. Mondragon Derek Lerma Daniel V. Richards National Park Service Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, California 93001 November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 MONITORING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... Species Selection ...........................................................................................2 Site Selection .................................................................................................3 Sampling Technique Selection .......................................................................3 SAMPLING METHOD PROTOCOL......................................................................... General Information .......................................................................................8 1 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................9 5 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................11 Band Transects ...............................................................................................13 Random Point Contacts ..................................................................................15
  • Intertidal Organisms of Point Reyes National Seashore

    Intertidal Organisms of Point Reyes National Seashore

    Intertidal Organisms of Point Reyes National Seashore PORIFERA: sea sponges. CRUSTACEANS: barnacles, shrimp, crabs, and allies. CNIDERIANS: sea anemones and allies. MOLLUSKS : abalones, limpets, snails, BRYOZOANS: moss animals. clams, nudibranchs, chitons, and octopi. ECHINODERMS: sea stars, sea cucumbers, MARINE WORMS: flatworms, ribbon brittle stars, sea urchins. worms, peanut worms, segmented worms. UROCHORDATES: tunicates. Genus/Species Common Name Porifera Prosuberites spp. Cork sponge Leucosolenia eleanor Calcareous sponge Leucilla nuttingi Little white sponge Aplysilla glacialis Karatose sponge Lissodendoryx spp. Skunk sponge Ophlitaspongia pennata Red star sponge Haliclona spp. Purple haliclona Leuconia heathi Sharp-spined leuconia Cliona celata Yellow-boring sponge Plocarnia karykina Red encrusting sponge Hymeniacidon spp. Yellow nipple sponge Polymastia pachymastia Polymastia Cniderians Tubularia marina Tubularia hydroid Garveia annulata Orange-colored hydroid Ovelia spp. Obelia Sertularia spp. Sertularia Abientinaria greenii Green's bushy hydroid Aglaophenia struthionides Giant ostrich-plume hydroid Aglaophenia latirostris Dainty ostrich-plume hydroid Plumularia spp. Plumularia Pleurobrachia bachei Cat's eye Polyorchis spp. Bell-shaped jellyfish Chrysaora melanaster Striped jellyfish Velella velella By-the-wind-sailor Aurelia auria Moon jelly Epiactus prolifera Proliferating anemone Anthopleura xanthogrammica Giant green anemone Anthopleura artemissia Aggregated anemone Anthopleura elegantissima Burrowing anemone Tealia lofotensis
  • PHYTOPLANKTON Grass of The

    PHYTOPLANKTON Grass of The

    S. G. No. 9 Oregon State University Extension Service Rev. December 1973 FIGURE 6: Oregon State Univer- sity's Marine Science Center in MARINE ADVISORY PROGRAM Newport, Oregon, is engaged in re- search, teaching, marine extension, and related activities under the Sea Grant Program of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminis- tration. Located on Yaquina Bay, the center attracts thousands of visitors yearly to view the exhibits PHYTOPLANKTON of oceanographic phenomena and the aquaria of most of Oregon's marine fishes and invertebrates. Scientists studying the charac- grass of the sea teristics of life in the ocean (in- cluding phytoplankton) and in estu- aries work in various laboratories at the center. The Marine Science Center is home port for OSU School of Ocea- nography vessels, ranging in size from 180 to 33 feet (the 180-foot BY HERBERT CURL, JR. Yaquina and the 80-foot Cayuse PROFESSOR OF OCEANOGRAPHY are shown at the right). OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY Anyone taking a trip at sea or walking on the beach Want to Know More About Phytoplankton? Press, 1943—out of print; reprinted Ann Arbor: notices that nearshore water along coasts is frequently University Microfilms, Inc., University of Michigan). For the student or teacher who wishes to learn green or brown and sometimes even red. Often these more about phytoplankton, the following publications colors signify the presence of mud or silt carried into offer detailed information about phytoplankton and Want Other Marine Information? the sea by rivers or stirred up from the bottom if the their relationship to the ocean and mankind. Oregon State University's Extension Marine Advis- water is sufficiently shallow.
  • A Nutrient-Phytoplankton-Zooplankton Model for Classifying Estuaries Based on Susceptibility to Nitrogen Loads

    A Nutrient-Phytoplankton-Zooplankton Model for Classifying Estuaries Based on Susceptibility to Nitrogen Loads

    A NUTRIENT-PHYTOPLANKTON-ZOOPLANKTON MODEL FOR CLASSIFYING ESTUARIES BASED ON SUSCEPTIBILITY TO NITROGEN LOADS By Yuntao Zhou A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science (Natural Resources and Environment) in the University of Michigan April 18, 2006 Thesis Committee: Professor Donald Scavia, Chair Professor J. David Allan Abstract Estuarine responses to nutrient loads can be remarkably different. Many driving variables including light, water residence time, physical stratification, and temperature are responsible for the diversity of the response. To classify estuaries based on their susceptibility to nutrient loads, a nutrient- phytoplankton- zooplankton (NPZ) model was developed and applied to river-dominated, well-mixed estuaries. Estuaries are classified as having low, medium, high and hyper eutrophic conditions by the model. The result of the model suggests that water residence time is an important controlling variable in the process of achieving a steady-state response to nutrient loads. Although phytoplankton responses to residence time vary under different loads, they have the same positive trend. Phytoplankton responses are almost linear with water residence time initially, then decrease, and eventually plateau. i Table of Contents Part1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………1 Light availability………………………………………………………………………………..2 Water residence time……………………………………………………………………………3 Physical Stratification…………………………………………………………………………..3 Temperature…………………………………………………………………………………….4 Part 2. Modeling Approaches…………………………………………………………5 A simple plankton model (Steele and Henderson, 1981)……………………………………...7 Coastal ecosystem sensitivity to light and nutrient enrichment (Cloern 1999)……………..8 A model for partially mixed estuary (Peterson and Festa, 1984)………………………….....9 CSTT (Comprehensive Studies Task Team) model (Tett, 2003)…………………………….10 ASSETS (Assessment of Estuarine Trophic Status) model (Bricker, 2003) ………………..11 Part 3.
  • Water Column Primary Production in the Columbia River Estuary

    Water Column Primary Production in the Columbia River Estuary

    WATER COLUMN PRIMARY PRODUCTION IN THE COLUMBIA RIVER ESTUARY I a.~ ~~~~~~~~ 9 Final Report on the Water Column Primary Production Work Unit of the Columbia River Estuary Data Development Program WATER COLUMNNPRIMARY PRODUCTION IN THE COLUMBIA RIVER ESTUARY Contractor: Oregon State University College of Oceanography Principal Investigators: Lawrence F. Small and Bruce E. Frey College of Oceanography Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon 97331 February 1984 OSU PROJECT TEAM PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATORS Dr. Bruce E. Frey Dr. Lawrence F. Small GRADUATE RESEARCH ASSISTANT Dr. Ruben Lara-Lara TECHNICAL STAFF Ms. RaeDeane Leatham Mr. Stanley Moore Final Report Prepared by Bruce E. Frey, Ruben Lara-Lara and Lawrence F. Small PREFACE The Columbia River Estuarv Data Development Program This document is one of a set of publications and other materials produced by the Columbia River Estuary Data Development Program (CREDDP). CREDDP has two purposes: to increase understanding of the ecology of the Columbia River Estuary and to provide information useful in making land and water use decisions. The program was initiated by local governments and citizens who saw a need for a better information base for use in managing natural resources and in planning for development. In response to these concerns, the Governors of the states of Oregon and Washington requested in 1974 that the Pacific Northwest River Basins Commission (PNRBC) undertake an interdisciplinary ecological study of the estuary. At approximately the same time, local governments and port districts formed the Columbia River Estuary Study Taskforce (CREST) to develop a regional management plan for the estuary. PNRBC produced a Plan of Study for a six-year, $6.2 million program which was authorized by the U.S.
  • Structure and Productivity of Marine Benthic Diatom Communities in a Laboratory Model Ecosystem

    Structure and Productivity of Marine Benthic Diatom Communities in a Laboratory Model Ecosystem

    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF BARRY LEE WULFF for the DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (Name) (Degree) Botany in (Physiological-ecology) presented on /970 (Major) Q1ArrDae) Title: STRUCTURE AND PRODUCTIVITY OF MARINE BENTHIC DIATOM COMMUNITIES IN A LABORATORY MODEL ECO- SYSTEM Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: Dr. C. David McIntire Effects of light intensity, exposure to desiccation, reduced salinity, and thermal elevation on the functional and structural char- acteristics of marine benthic diatom communities were investigated in a laboratory model ecosystem and a respirometer chamber. Measurements of biomass (dry weight and ash-free dry weight) and chlorophyll a were made for each of the communities.Population studies were performed to determine community structure.Finally, photosynthetic rates of the communities at selected light intensities were determined in the respirometer for communities developed in experiments designed to test the effects ofexposure to desiccation and variations in light intensity. Biomass accumulated most rapidly on substrates subjected to high light intensities, without exposure to desiccation. Under inter- tidal conditions, biomass accumulation was progressively greater with less exposure to desiccation.Organic material (ash-free dry weight) was greater on substrates from summer than winter experi- ments. Both reduced salinity and thermal elevation interacted with light to stimulate algal production, and mats of Melosira nummuloides developed rapidly and floated to the surface. Communities acclimated to different light intensities and periods of desiccation responded differently to various light intensities in the respirometer chamber.Substrates receiving little atmospheric ex- posure developed thicker layers of biomass permitting significantly higher rates of photosynthesis as light intensity increased.Generally, substrates developed at low light intensities attained a maximum photosynthetic rate at the lower light intensities in the respirometer, presumably because of an acclimation phenomenon.
  • Astoria Formation Are Exposed at Jumpoff Joe

    Astoria Formation Are Exposed at Jumpoff Joe

    COAS TAL LANDFORMS N EWPOR T - LI NCOLN C IT Y Vo l. 36 , No.5 M ay 1974 STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES The Ore Bin Published Monthly By STATE OF OREGON DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL INDUSTRIES Head Office: 1069 State Office Bldg., Portland, Oregon - 97201 Telephone: 229 - 5580 FIELD OFFICES 2033 First Street 521 N. E. "E" Street Boker 97814 Grants Pass 97526 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscription rate - $2.00 per colenc:br yeor Available bock issues $.25 each Second closs postage paid at Portland, Oregon GOVERNING BOARD R. W. deWeese, Portland, Chairman Willicwn E. Miller, Bend H. lyle Von Gordon, Grants Pass STATE GEOLOGIST R. E. Corcoran GEOLOGISTS IN CHARGE OF FIELD OFFICES Howard C. Brooks, Boker Len Romp, Grants Pass Permission i, gront.d to r.int information contained herein . Credit gillen the Stot. of Oregon o.pcrtment of Geology and Min.al Industri. for compiling thi, information will be appreciated. Stote of O r egon The ORE BIN Deportmentof Geology ond Minerol Indu$ITies Volum e 36,No.5 1069 Siote Office Bldg. May 1974 Portlond Oregon 97201 ROCK UNITS AND COASTAL LANDFORMS BETWEEN NEWPORT AND liNCOLN CITY, OREGON Ernest H. lund Deportment of Geology, University of Oregon The coost between Newport and lincoln City is composed of sedimen­ tary rock punctuated locally by volcanic rock. Where the shore is on sedi­ mentary rock, it is characterized by a long, sandy beach in front of a sea cliff. Perched above the sea cliff is the sandy marine terrace that fringes most of this segment of the Oregon coost.