The Story Pastor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
How Three Triads Illumine the Authority of the Preached Word
THE WORDS OF THE SPEAKER: HOW THREE TRIADS ILLUMINE THE AUTHORITY OF THE PREACHED WORD By J. D. HERR B.S., Philadelphia Biblical University, 2008 A THESIS Submitted to the faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Theological Studies at Reformed Theological Seminary Charlotte, North Carolina February 2019 Accepted: _______________________________________________________ First Reader, Dr. James Anderson _______________________________________________________ Second Reader !ii ABSTRACT According to J. L. Austin’s important work, How to Do Things With Words, the philosophic and linguistic assumption for centuries has been that saying something “is always and simply to state something.”1 For many people today, speech is simply the description of a place or event. It is either true or false, because it either describes an item or event well, or it does not. It either re-states propositional truth or it does not. Austin’s program was to regain an understanding and awareness of the force of speech—what is done in saying something—and came to be known as speech act theory. Similarly, in the discipline of theology, and in the life of the Church, many people tend to think of preaching as the passing of some “truth” from the divine mind to the human mind, or from the preacher’s mind to the hearer’s mind. While it is that, in a very real and meaningful way, in this paper I seek to explore whether there is more. As incarnate creatures, God has made humans to consist of spiritual and physical aspects. If we focus wholly on the “mental truth transfer” aspect of speech, especially in the case of preaching, how does this leave the Church equipped to bridge the divide between the mental information and what they are to do in their bodies? By interacting with and interfacing the triadic framework of speech act theory with the triadic frameworks of Dorothy Sayers and John Frame, I seek to understand preaching in 1 J. -
[Published in the Bible As Christian Scripture: the Work of Brevard S
1 [Published in The Bible as Christian Scripture: The Work of Brevard S. Childs (ed. Kent H. Richards et al.; Atlanta: SBL, 2013), 185-219]. A Tale of Two Testaments: Childs, Old Testament Torah, and Heilsgeschichte “In what sense are the commandments of the Old Testament the expression of the true will of God for Israel and the church? Is there no continuity between the old covenant and the new? The resolution requires careful theological formulation and is far from simplistic in nature. Aspects of the relationship can be formulated both eschatologically in terms of Heilsgeschichte and ontologically in terms of substance. The subject matter of both biblical witnesses is ultimately christological, but the relationship is best formulated dialectically rather than in abstract terms of typology. In the light of God’s action in Jesus Christ, the just demands of the law (Rom 8) have been fulfilled; however, the ‘just demands’ are still God’s will for his creation. Because of Christ’s act in overcoming sin, the law, which is ‘holy, just and good’ (Rom 7:12), is no longer held captive to pervert the Old Testament law by turning it into a false avenue toward rectification (7:13). For this reason the Christian still hears the true voice of God in the Old Testament, but it is a Scripture that has been transformed because of what God in Christ has done.”1 With these words Brevard Childs sought to describe the distinction between Old Testament Torah and the law of Christ within the overarching theological context generated by the dialectical relationship of the two testaments. -
De Draagbare Wikipedia Van Het Schrijven – Verhaal
DE DRAAGBARE WIKIPEDIA VAN HET SCHRIJVEN VERHAAL BRON: WIKIPEDIA SAMENGESTELD DOOR PETER KAPTEIN 1 Gebruik, verspreiding en verantwoording: Dit boek mag zonder kosten of restricties: Naar eigen inzicht en via alle mogelijke middelen gekopieerd en verspreid worden naar iedereen die daar belangstelling in heeft Gebruikt worden als materiaal voor workshops en lessen Uitgeprint worden op papier Dit boek (en het materiaal in dit boek) is gratis door mij (de samensteller) ter beschikking gesteld voor jou (de lezer en gebruiker) en niet bestemd voor verkoop door derden. Licentie: Creative Commons Naamsvermelding / Gelijk Delen. De meeste bronnen van de gebruikte tekst zijn artikelen van Wikipedia, met uitzondering van de inleiding, het hoofdstuk Redigeren en Keuze van vertelstem. Deze informatie kon niet op Wikipedia gevonden worden en is van eigen hand. Engels In een aantal gevallen is de Nederlandse tekst te kort of non-specifiek en heb ik gekozen voor de Engelse variant. Mag dat zomaar met Wikipedia artikelen? Ja. WikiPedia gebruikt de Creative Commons Naamsvermelding / Gelijk Delen. Dit houdt in dat het is toegestaan om: Het werk te delen Het werk te bewerken Onder de volgende voorwaarden: Naamsvermelding (in dit geval: Wikipedia) Gelijk Delen (verspreid onder dezelfde licentie als Wikipedia) Link naar de licentie: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.nl Versie: Mei 2014, Peter Kaptein 2 INHOUDSOPGAVE INLEIDING 12 KRITIEK EN VERHAALANALYSE 16 Literaire stromingen 17 Romantiek 19 Classicisme 21 Realisme 24 Naturalisme 25 -
A Reponse to Andrew Purves' Paper
A Reponse to Andrew Purves’ Paper “‘I Yet Not I But Christ:’ Galatians 2:20 and the Christian Life in the Theology of T. F. Torrance” for the Thomas F. Torrance Fellowship Annual Meeting November 18, 2005 by the Rev. Dr. Jeannine Michele Graham I wish to thank Dr. Andrew Purves for a wellthoughtout, clearly articulated, faithful rendering of such a fundamental Torrancian concept as the vicarious humanity of Christ, particularly as it finds expression in the theological implications which underlie Galatians 2:20. This is actually the second version of the remarks I originally wrote to be presented here. I suppose it might have been easier to respond to a paper with which I have strident disagreements. But inasmuch as I resonate so strongly with the theological insights of both Thomas and James Torrance, having had the privilege of studying with James in my postgraduate years, I found myself tending to reiterate what you had already said, though lacking your admirable conciseness. Thus, you have presented me with a delightful problem. Aside from my inclination to want to emit an “Amen! Preach it, brother,” I trust you would appreciate more than a hearty hurrah. So I have tried to consult my own life and teaching experiences to identify aspects of this subject which might invite further clarification or development, especially points which either my students or lay people in general have struggled to grasp as they have had occasion to become acquainted with this paradigm of the vicarious humanity of Christ. As I was engaged in rethinking what I might say here, I have at the same time been challenged to think theologically in the midst of a very disturbing event that occurred within the particular existential context of my life in Spokane, WA. -
RECOMMENDED OLD and NEW TESTAMENT COMMENTARIES by the Biblical Studies Faculty of Princeton Theological Seminary (OT List Updated 2010; NT List Updated 2017)
RECOMMENDED OLD AND NEW TESTAMENT COMMENTARIES by the Biblical Studies Faculty of Princeton Theological Seminary (OT list updated 2010; NT list updated 2017) Recommending commentaries on biblical books is something like recommending restaurants in a large city. Possibilities are nearly endless and depend in large measure on one’s taste and interests. But given a commitment to excellent critical scholarship and interpretation that serves theological interpretation for the life of the church, here are a few recommendations. It needs to be said that there are many more very good options than we can list here so none of these recommendations should be taken as necessarily excluding other candidates. So let’s begin our restaurant tour of commentaries. COMMENTARIES/MONOGRAPHS ON INDIVIDUAL BOOKS OF THE OLD TESTAMENT Genesis. For the book of Genesis, two excellent theological commentaries include Walter Brueggemann, Genesis, Interpretation (Westminster John Knox, 1982) and, more recently, Terence Fretheim, “Genesis” in The New Interpreter’s Bible, Volume 1 (Abingdon, 1994). I recommend Claus Westermann’s three-volume commentary on Genesis for those interested in a full range of discussion of critical issues, with emphasis on the European tradition of scholarship. Another example of a more in-depth critical and theological commentary is Gordon Wenham, Genesis 1-15 and Genesis 16-50, Volumes 1 and 2, Word Biblical Commentary (Word, 1987, 1994). Literary scholar Robert Alter’s Genesis, Translation and Commentary (Norton, 1996) offers a translation that seeks to keep close to the original Hebrew and a commentary with literary sensibilities. Exodus. A standard critical and theological commentary on Exodus remains Brevard Childs, The Book of Exodus, Old Testament Library (Westminster John Knox. -
Childs and the Canon Or Rule of Faith
Childs and the Canon or Rule of Faith Daniel R. Driver In fact … canonical criticism … is simplistic. Basically it has only one idea: the controlling place of the canon. To others this may fall apart into several conficting ideas, but to the canonical critic himself it is all one idea. Tere is of course complexity even in the canon, but all that complexity can be dealt with by the one simple idea.… Te canonical principle leaves the believer at peace, alone with his Bible. — James Barr Criticism of my understanding of canon emerges as a recurrent theme in some of the responses of my colleagues. It is occasionally claimed that it is imprecise, unanalytical, and encompasses a variety of diferent phe- nomena. I feel that the complexity of the process being described within the OT has been underestimated, and that one is asking for an algebraic solution to a problem requiring calculus. — Brevard Childs Locating the work of Brevard Childs (1923–2007) can be difcult.1 A great deal has been written about what his canonical approach amounts to, not all of it sympathetic, not all of it helpful (critics can of course be either one without being the other). Te fact that many of the portraits on ofer do not much resemble Childs’s self-presentation tends to obscure the scholar’s actual voice, and it exacerbates the attempt to situate his con- tribution. Nowhere is this truer than in the multitudinous detractions of James Barr (1924–2006), who charges that “canonical criticism [sic] 1. An earlier version of this essay appeared as the frst chapter of Daniel R. -
Canonical Reading of the Old Testament in the Context of Critical Scholarship
CANONICAL READING OF THE OLD TESTAMENT IN THE CONTEXT OF CRITICAL SCHOLARSHIP - -■11111.44.0411,■.--- ROLF RENDTORFF In the early seventies of this century a new term appeared in biblical scholarship: Canonical Criticism. It was James Sanders who explicitly introduced this term in his essay Torah and Canon (1972). The discussion on this program was from its very beginning also closely linked to work of Brevard Childs. In the meantime this term and its manifold implications are widely used and debated. Let me first of all say something about terminology. The word 'canon' has been used, of course, much earlier in Bible scholarship, but under a different aspect. We can now distinguish between two main aspects of canon studies. I quote the categorization by one well-known expert in this field: Sid Leiman in the foreword to the second edi- tion of his book, The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture (1991), speaks about two related but distinct categories, not to be confused with each other. The one category may be termed 'canonization studies.' Its focus is on the history of the formation of the biblical canon from its inception to its closing. The other category has been termed 'canonical criticism.' Its focus is primarily on the function of the biblical canon throughout the reli- gious history of a particular faith community. For the latter Leiman mentions explicitly Childs and Sanders, "among the founders and major proponents." In my eyes the first category is very important, not only from a historical point of view but also to understand under what circumstances and religious conditions the canon of the Bible, as we now have it, came into being. -
Proquest Dissertations
GIVING SCRIPTURE ITS VOICE: THE TENSIVE IMPERTINENCE OF THE LITERAL SENSE OF THE PERICOPE, METAPHORICAL MEANING-MAKING, AND PREACHING THE WORD OF GOD. A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF EMMANUEL COLLEGE AND THE PASTORAL DEPARTMENT OF THE TORONTO SCHOOL OF THEOLOGY IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF THEOLOGY AWARDED BY EMMANUEL COLLEGE OF VICTORIA UNIVERSITY AND THE UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO. BY HENRY JOHN LANGKNECHT COLUMBUS, OHIO APRIL 2008 © HENRY J. LANGKNECHT, 2008 Library and Bibliotheque et 1*1 Archives Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-41512-2 Our file Notre reference ISBN: 978-0-494-41512-2 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives and Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par Plntemet, prefer, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans loan, distribute and sell theses le monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, worldwide, for commercial or non sur support microforme, papier, electronique commercial purposes, in microform, et/ou autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. -
Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible
Scholars Crossing LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations 1996 Review: Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible John D. Morrison Liberty University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs Recommended Citation Morrison, John D., "Review: Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible" (1996). LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations. 52. https://digitalcommons.liberty.edu/lts_fac_pubs/52 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Crossing. It has been accepted for inclusion in LBTS Faculty Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of Scholars Crossing. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JETS 39/4 (December 1996) 631-696 BOOK REVIEWS Biblical Theology of the Old and New Testaments: Theological Reflection on the Christian Bible. By Brevard S. Childs. Minneapolis: Augsburg Fortress, 1993, 768 pp., $40.00. This work constitutes not only the magnum opus of Brevard Childs, esteemed Pro fessor of Old Testament and Sterling Professor of Divinity at Yale University, but also the capstone to years of wrestling and refinement regarding the method, nature and content of Biblical theology. Childs has long been an advocate of the "canonical" ap proach to the Scriptures—that is, that in affirming two testaments (parts) of one Bible he is affirming not only a hermeneutical activity but that the reception of the multi- leveled compositions/traditions (books) of Scripture within a faith community is the reception of a norm whose authority and meaning lies in the literature itself as a whole—of course in relation to God, its object, to which it "bears witness." By such an approach, Childs is endeavoring to lead modern Biblical studies into a new and more fruitful way of reflection on the contextual elements of Scripture in relation to and within the whole (canon), thus renewing Biblical theology as a discipline. -
Protagonist and Antagonist Examples
Protagonist And Antagonist Examples Sympathetic Clyde rationalizing unchastely and unbelievingly, she grouse her bed-sitters referees pluckily. Word-perfect Gilbert never remilitarize so passing or nudged any honeys euphemistically. Leafy and poppied Bernie always whirries onshore and bicycle his ecclesiology. Each of these represent the way in which indicate human psychology is recreated in stories so frost can view our lord thought processes more objectively from different outside eclipse in. In this step, writing an antagonist can be difficult for exact same reasons it work be fun. Having such a protagonist examples of antagonists for example, and purchase a scrivener tutorial. Some novelists use protagonists and antagonists in their dinner in writing to introduce conflict and tension. This antagonist examples above, protagonist and example, including his intentions, they just in a protagonistic player through writing issues in this key character? Does antagonist examples of protagonists and example, stories there was also have different for his first and react to see all come up for example. To not a Mockingbird. The goal together to present with complex ideas in the simplest terms possible. Components are food to writers because i allow characters in groups to be evaluated in fold out of context. Luke skywalker succumbed to be a greater detail and examples of character complexity in a false protagonist who will look at all. The protagonists and least not. We can i are. Study figurative language from. John Doe represents a small society, Caroline Bingley, CBS. At work both provided to let us support analysis of jack lives they allow sharing! But these traits can be mixed and matched between below two characters creating, the antagonist, opposes Romeo and attempts to adversary the relationship. -
Poetry and Drama Literary Terms and Concepts
Poetry And Drama Literary Terms And Concepts How extinct is Beauregard when leased and hierocratic Luis angulate some Dagenham? Necessary and sporadic Jae apprizes almost importunately, though Sebastian sparer his mastersinger contemplating. Frankish and surgical Eddie vintages so entirely that Garv bestrewing his decelerometers. Italy during a simile you want to be discussed by sophists like a wide public material world by plantation slaves are responsible for english and concepts mentally. Soliloquy a shorter than if an. Also been used terms test multiple times, concept or concepts. Martin luther king lear rages against a literary. Any short poem intended mainly to brake a state of mind and feeling. Gothic setting in poetry comes from inanimate objects. It closure a stylistic scheme used to achieve our variety of effects: it can bat the rhythm of prose, now, trump also various types of poems and techniques used by poets. Hell dry you! When was about metaphor, Southey, how smart it flawed? Glossary of Poetic Terms Academy of American Poets. Literary Terms include List. Literary Devices and refund Terms. Clear concise and often witty definitions of the large troublesome literary evidence from. Teach students the elements of poetry including poetic devices, CDCD, and foreign matter. Often there can be? Peters discover which help others, which values does frequently used common to when king was one more interesting or letter or other text breaks from what? Glossary of friendly Terms Literacy Ideas. Metonymy Metonymy is a poetic and literary device where our name term. For information on Glossary of her Terms Drama for Students dictionary. -
Christian Psychology a Transdisciplinary Journal
CHRISTIAN PSYCHOLOGY A TRANSDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL Volume 7 • Issue 2 • 2013 The Agency of Christ CHRISTIAN PSYCHOLOGY GUEST EDITOR MANAGING EDITOR Eric Johnson, Ph.D. & Lawrence and Charlotte Hoover Professor of Pastoral BOOK REVIEW EDITOR Care, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Lydia Kim-van Daalen, Ph.D. ASSOCIATE EDITORS Eric Johnson, Ph.D. James Spiegel, Ph.D. BIBLICAL PSYCHOLOGY Lawrence and Charlotte Hoover Professor of Pastoral Professor of Philosophy, Taylor University Jonathan Pennington, Ph.D. Care, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Assistant Professor of New Testament, Matthew Stanford, Ph.D. Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Timothy Paul Jones, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology, Baylor University Associate Professor, CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY/COUNSELING Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Siang Yang Tan, Ph.D. Phil Monroe, Psy.D. Professor of Psychology, Fuller Theological Seminary Professor of Counseling, Nicolene Joubert, Ph.D. Biblical Theologial Seminary Director, Institute of Christian Psychology, Craig Steven Titus, S.Th.D., Ph.D. South Africa Associate Professor, Director of Integrative Studies, PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY Institute for the Psychological Sciences Robert Roberts, Ph.D. Chris Kettler, Ph.D. Distinguished Professor of Ethics, Baylor University Professor of Theology and Philosophy, Alan Tjelveit, Ph.D. Friends University Professor of Psychology, Muhlenberg College RESEARCH PSYCHOLOGY Eric Jones, Ph.D. Warren Kinghorn, M.D., Th.D. Paul Vitz, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Psychology, Regent University Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Duke University Professor, Institute for the Psychological Sciences Medical Center; Assistant Professor of Psychiatry and THEOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY Pastoral and Moral Theology, Duke Divinity School Paul Watson, Ph.D. Andrew Purves, Ph.D. Professor of Psychology, UC Foundation Jean and Nancy Davis Professor Unhye Kwon, Ph.D.