Changes in Tree Names

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changes in Tree Names WESTERN A rborist Changes in tree names Donald R. Hodel Ost CULTIVAteD In contrast, botanical names some- atic order that reflects evolutionary trees have one or more times change but they have several relationships among species, genera, common names and advantages. A botanical name for a and families, arborists can sometimes Mnearly all have one or more botanical species does not vary from place to glean or extrapolate additional in- names (a Latin binomial composed place, a species can have only one ac- formation from the name to enhance of first a genus name followed by a cepted botanical name and only that their knowledge about the culture and species name). Common names usu- species can have that name. Botanical management of a little-known tree, ally do not change but have several names are understood worldwide including growth patterns and prun- shortcomings. Common names for regardless of the spoken language, ing, pest and disease resistance, litter the same species can vary from place botanical names are often descriptive potential, esthetic qualities, and soil, to place, a species can have more than of the species and provide informa- nutritional, and water requirements, one common name and more than tion about the relationships of the tree simply from already knowing its close one species can share the same com- with related species, and there is a set relatives. mon name, common names may not be understood by those unversed in the language of the name, common One of the most frustrating aspects names frequently are not descriptive and can even be erroneous or mislead- of botanical names that confronts ing, common names typically provide no information about the systematic arborists is that they sometimes relationships of the tree with related species, and there are no rules govern- change. ing the use of common names. of rules or a code governing the use of Why botanical names change Figure 1. Platanus × hispanica is the botanical names. Thus, arborists and Three primary reasons are responsible new, accepted name for this tree related professionals frequently use for changes in botanical names and in Lakewood, CA that was formerly and rely on botanical names. two of the three are based entirely or known as Platanus × acerifolia. Unfortunately, one of the most partly on the concept or rule of prior- frustrating aspects of botanical names ity of publication of a name, which is that confront arborists is that they that the oldest, valid name usually is sometimes change. Changes in botani- the accepted name. The three reasons cal names of trees significantly impact that botanical names change are: arborists and other professionals in 1. ignorance of earlier names; the tree and landscape management 2. new interpretations and classifi- industries because they must learn cations of species and genera; new botanical names, change docu- 3. misidentification. ments, inventories, and databases to reflect the new names, prepare new Ignorance of earlier names labels and tags, and update references Sometimes plants end up with more and cross-reference old names. All than one botanical name, which is this work takes time and energy and not permitted according to the rules. has a cost associated with it. This situation usually happens when However, arborists and related a botanist names a new species not professionals will find it advanta- knowing that the species already geous to accept, learn, and use the has a valid, accepted name. In these new botanical names to ensure pre- cases, because of the rule of priority ciseness and ease of communication. of publication, the oldest name takes Also, because botanical names are priority and is the accepted name structured in an hierarchical, system- and later names become synonyms. Fall 2011 48 WESTERN A rborist Figure 2. (Above left) The new accepted name for this Chorisia speciosa in Los Angeles, CA is Ceiba speciosa. Figure 3. (Above right) All Callistemon were transferred to Melaleuca, so the new, accepted name for these Callistemon citrinus in Seal Beach, CA is Melaleuca citrina. For example, the London plane tree, many botanists feel that all Michelia ent genus. If there is no existing genus Platanus × acerifolia (Fig. 1), a name (for example M. alba, M. champaca, and into which to place these segregate of which most of us are familiar, M. doltsopa) should also be transferred species, then a new genus must be was named and described in 1805. to Magnolia. erected for them. The transfer of some However, the same hybrid species In contrast, sometimes this new in- well known species of trumpet tree, was named and described as Platanus formation shows that some species in Tabebuia, to a new genus, Handroan- × hispanica 35 years earlier in 1770; a genus are more distantly related to thus, is an example. Thus the accepted thus, this earlier name, although not the other species, and they should be names for the yellow trumpet tree, well known, becomes the accepted separated out and placed in a differ- Tabebuia chrysotricha (Fig. 5), the pink name and P. × acerifolia is relegated to a synonym. Figure 4. (Below left) The new, accepted name for these Callistemon viminalis New interpretations and classifi- in Santa Barbara, CA is Melaleuca viminalis. cations Figure 5. (Below right) Some Tabebuia were transferred to Handroanthus, so Recent rapid advances of DNA se- the new accepted name for this Tabebuia chrysotricha in Bellflower, CA is Han- quencing and other molecular tech- droanthus chyrsotrichus. niques have allowed botanists to elicit and accumulate new information about how plants are evolutionarily related, which has led to new system- atic classifications of species and even genera and families. For example, new data has revealed that the floss silk tree, Chorisia speciosa (Fig. 2), and other species in the genus, are more closely related to trees in the genus Ceiba, so closely, in fact, that they should be included in Ceiba. Because Ceiba is the older name, it has priority and the species of Chorisia were re- cently transferred to Ceiba. Thus, Ceiba speciosa is now the accepted name and Chorisia speciosa is relegated to a synonym. Similarly, all Callistemon (Figs. 3-4) have been transferred to Melaleuca and all Talauma (for ex- ample T. hodgsonii) to Magnolia, and 49 Fall 2011 WESTERN A rborist Figure 6. (Above left) The new, accepted name for this Tabebuia impetiginosa at The Arboretum in Arcadia, CA is Handro- anthus impetiginosus. Figure 7. (Above right). Some Eucalyptus were transferred to the new genus Corymbia, so the new, accepted name for these Eucalyptus citriodora in Lakewood, CA is Corymbia citriodora. Table 1. Name Changes in Some of the More Common Landscape Trees Common name Previous botanical name New, accepted botanical name bottlebrush Callistemon citrinus Melaleuca citrina weeping bottlebrush Callistemon viminalis Melaleuca viminalis floss silk tree Chorisia speciosa Ceiba speciosa white floss silk tree Chorisia insignis Ceiba insignis Monterey cypress Cupressus macrocarpa (Fig. 9) Hesperocyparis macrocarpa lemon-flowering gum Eucalyptus citriodora Corymbia citriodora red-flowering gum Eucalyptus ficifolia Corymbia ficifolia spotted gum Eucalyptus maculata Corymbia maculata London plane tree Platanus × acerifolia Platanus × hispanica fern pine Podocarpus gracilior Afrocarpus falcatus Chinese tallow tree Sapium sebiferum Triadica sebifera yellow trumpet tree Tabebuia chrysotricha Handroanthus chrysotrichus pink trumpet tree Tabebuia impetiginosa Handroanthus impetiginosus Montezuma cypress Taxodium mucronatum Taxodium huegelii (Fig. 11) Brisbane box Tristania conferta Lophostemon confertus (Fig. 12) water gum Tristania laurina Tristaniopsis laurina Fall 2011 50 WESTERN A rborist Figure 8. (Above left) The new, accepted name for this Eucalyptus ficifoliain Los Alamitos, CA is Corymbia ficifolia. Figure 9. (Above right) Hesperocyparis macrocarpa is the new, accepted name for this tree in Strybing Arboretum at Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, CA that was formerly known as Cupressus macrocarpa. trumpet tree, T. impetiginosa (Fig. 6), Acacia farnesiana]). However, a move is pytus calophylla) or hybrids between are now Handroanthus chrisotrichus afoot to retain the name Acacia for the the two species. and H. impetiginosus, respectively, African species, so the final word may In most cases of name changes and the two Tabebuia names are now not yet be in on this matter. described above just the genus name synonyms. Similarly, some of the best changed while the species name re- known eucalypts, the picturesque Misidentification mained the same. However, in some lemon-scented gum, Eucalyptus citrio- When plants are brought into cultiva- cases, such as with the fern pine (Fig. dora (Fig. 7), and the showy and color- tion they may have been misidentified 10) where Afrocarpus falcatus is now ful red-flowering gum,E. ficifolia( Fig. and given and grown under an er- the accepted name for what we once 8), have been transferred to the new roneous name. Once a plant appears called Podocarpus gracilior, both the genus Corymbia and are now known in cultivation and is associated with genus and species names changed. as Corymbia citriodora and C. ficifolia, a specific name, it is a difficult and respectively. sometimes lengthy process to have How to keep up to date with tree Similarly, the large genus Acacia the correct name accepted, even when names has been split into several genera, to the original name can be shown to be Arborists and related professionals the sometimes outraged consternation erroneous. For example, the brush can easily check on plant names and and angst of many botanists, horti- cherry is frequently but erroneously keep up to date with changes by visit- culturists, and arborists. Acacia has grown and sold as Syzygium panicu- ing one or more of the on-line plant been retained for most of the roughly latum, which is a rare species in Cali- data bases: 970 Australian species with only a fornia. The correct name for nearly 1.
Recommended publications
  • The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves
    The Native Vegetation of the Nattai and Bargo Reserves Project funded under the Central Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division Biodiversity Data Priorities Program Conservation Assessment and Data Unit Conservation Programs and Planning Branch, Metropolitan Environmental Protection and Regulation Division Department of Environment and Conservation ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CADU (Central) Manager Special thanks to: Julie Ravallion Nattai NP Area staff for providing general assistance as well as their knowledge of the CADU (Central) Bioregional Data Group area, especially: Raf Pedroza and Adrian Coordinator Johnstone. Daniel Connolly Citation CADU (Central) Flora Project Officer DEC (2004) The Native Vegetation of the Nattai Nathan Kearnes and Bargo Reserves. Unpublished Report. Department of Environment and Conservation, CADU (Central) GIS, Data Management and Hurstville. Database Coordinator This report was funded by the Central Peter Ewin Directorate Parks and Wildlife Division, Biodiversity Survey Priorities Program. Logistics and Survey Planning All photographs are held by DEC. To obtain a Nathan Kearnes copy please contact the Bioregional Data Group Coordinator, DEC Hurstville Field Surveyors David Thomas Cover Photos Teresa James Nathan Kearnes Feature Photo (Daniel Connolly) Daniel Connolly White-striped Freetail-bat (Michael Todd), Rock Peter Ewin Plate-Heath Mallee (DEC) Black Crevice-skink (David O’Connor) Aerial Photo Interpretation Tall Moist Blue Gum Forest (DEC) Ian Roberts (Nattai and Bargo, this report; Rainforest (DEC) Woronora, 2003; Western Sydney, 1999) Short-beaked Echidna (D. O’Connor) Bob Wilson (Warragamba, 2003) Grey Gum (Daniel Connolly) Pintech (Pty Ltd) Red-crowned Toadlet (Dave Hunter) Data Analysis ISBN 07313 6851 7 Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly Report Writing and Map Production Nathan Kearnes Daniel Connolly EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report describes the distribution and composition of the native vegetation within and immediately surrounding Nattai National Park, Nattai State Conservation Area and Bargo State Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pests, Diseases, and Aridity Have Shaped the Genome of Corymbia Citriodora
    Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Recent Work Title Pests, diseases, and aridity have shaped the genome of Corymbia citriodora. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5t51515k Journal Communications biology, 4(1) ISSN 2399-3642 Authors Healey, Adam L Shepherd, Mervyn King, Graham J et al. Publication Date 2021-05-10 DOI 10.1038/s42003-021-02009-0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-021-02009-0 OPEN Pests, diseases, and aridity have shaped the genome of Corymbia citriodora ✉ Adam L. Healey 1,2 , Mervyn Shepherd 3, Graham J. King 3, Jakob B. Butler 4, Jules S. Freeman 4,5,6, David J. Lee 7, Brad M. Potts4,5, Orzenil B. Silva-Junior8, Abdul Baten 3,9, Jerry Jenkins 1, Shengqiang Shu 10, John T. Lovell 1, Avinash Sreedasyam1, Jane Grimwood 1, Agnelo Furtado2, Dario Grattapaglia8,11, Kerrie W. Barry10, Hope Hundley10, Blake A. Simmons 2,12, Jeremy Schmutz 1,10, René E. Vaillancourt4,5 & Robert J. Henry 2 Corymbia citriodora is a member of the predominantly Southern Hemisphere Myrtaceae family, which includes the eucalypts (Eucalyptus, Corymbia and Angophora; ~800 species). 1234567890():,; Corymbia is grown for timber, pulp and paper, and essential oils in Australia, South Africa, Asia, and Brazil, maintaining a high-growth rate under marginal conditions due to drought, poor-quality soil, and biotic stresses. To dissect the genetic basis of these desirable traits, we sequenced and assembled the 408 Mb genome of Corymbia citriodora, anchored into eleven chromosomes. Comparative analysis with Eucalyptus grandis reveals high synteny, although the two diverged approximately 60 million years ago and have different genome sizes (408 vs 641 Mb), with few large intra-chromosomal rearrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Alyssum) and the Correct Name of the Goldentuft Alyssum
    ARNOLDIA VE 1 A continuation of the BULLETIN OF POPULAR INFORMATION of the Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University VOLUME 26 JUNE 17, 1966 NUMBERS 6-7 ORNAMENTAL MADWORTS (ALYSSUM) AND THE CORRECT NAME OF THE GOLDENTUFT ALYSSUM of the standard horticultural reference works list the "Madworts" as MANYa group of annuals, biennials, perennials or subshrubs in the family Cru- ciferae, which with the exception of a few species, including the goldentuft mad- wort, are not widely cultivated. The purposes of this article are twofold. First, to inform interested gardeners, horticulturists and plantsmen that this exception, with a number of cultivars, does not belong to the genus Alyssum, but because of certain critical and technical characters, should be placed in the genus Aurinia of the same family. The second goal is to emphasize that many species of the "true" .~lyssum are notable ornamentals and merit greater popularity and cul- tivation. The genus Alyssum (now containing approximately one hundred and ninety species) was described by Linnaeus in 1753 and based on A. montanum, a wide- spread European species which is cultivated to a limited extent only. However, as medicinal and ornamental garden plants the genus was known in cultivation as early as 1650. The name Alyssum is of Greek derivation : a meaning not, and lyssa alluding to madness, rage or hydrophobia. Accordingly, the names Mad- wort and Alyssum both refer to the plant’s reputation as an officinal herb. An infu- sion concocted from the leaves and flowers was reputed to have been administered as a specific antidote against madness or the bite of a rabid dog.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, History of Botanical Nomenclature
    Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Module 15: Botanical Nomenclature: Concept, history of botanical nomenclature (local and scientific) and its advantages, formation of code. Content writer: Dr.AvishekBhattacharjee, Central National Herbarium, Botanical Survey of India, P.O. – B. Garden, Howrah – 711 103. Module – 15; Content writer: AvishekBhattacharjee Botanical Nomenclature:Concept – A name is a handle by which a mental image is passed. Names are just labels we use to ensure we are understood when we communicate. Nomenclature is a mechanism for unambiguous communication about the elements of taxonomy. Botanical Nomenclature, i.e. naming of plants is that part of plant systematics dealing with application of scientific names to plants according to some set rules. It is related to, but distinct from taxonomy. A botanical name is a unique identifier to which information of a taxon can be attached, thus enabling the movement of data across languages, scientific disciplines, and electronic retrieval systems. A plant’s name permits ready summarization of information content of the taxon in a nested framework. A systemofnamingplantsforscientificcommunicationmustbe international inscope,andmustprovideconsistencyintheapplicationof names.Itmustalsobeacceptedbymost,ifnotall,membersofthe scientific community. These criteria led, almost inevitably, to International Botanical Congresses (IBCs) being the venue at which agreement on a system of scientific nomenclature for plants was sought. The IBCs led to publication of different ‘Codes’ which embodied the rules and regulations of botanical nomenclature and the decisions taken during these Congresses. Advantages ofBotanical Nomenclature: Though a common name may be much easier to remember, there are several good reasons to use botanical names for plant identification. Common names are not unique to a specific plant.
    [Show full text]
  • Their Botany, Essential Oils and Uses 6.86 MB
    MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy, Lyndley A. Craven and John C. Doran MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales Lyndley A. Craven Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO Plant Industry John C. Doran Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO Plant Industry 2013 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. ACIAR operates as part of Australia's international development cooperation program, with a mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia. It commissions collaborative research between Australian and developing-country researchers in areas where Australia has special research competence. It also administers Australia's contribution to the International Agricultural Research Centres. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by ACIAR. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research and development objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected] Brophy J.J., Craven L.A. and Doran J.C. 2013. Melaleucas: their botany, essential oils and uses. ACIAR Monograph No. 156. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • Eucalypt Discovery Walk
    Eucalypt Discovery Walk This self-guided walk through the Botanic Gardens features 21 eucalypts, each of which has an interpretive sign. Additional information is provided here. A round trip, starting with #1 Eucalyptus cunninghamii in the North Car Park and returning past #21 Eucalyptus viminalis to the Visitor Information Centre, will take about an hour and covers a range of terrain (e.g. stairs, lawn, uneven surfaces). There are about 850 eucalypt species, almost all occurring naturally only in Australia. Indeed, eucalypts are a defining feature of the Australian landscape. They are an important component of Australian vegetation and provide a habitat for many native animals. Some species have a wide geographic distribution, others are extremely restricted in their natural habitat and may need conservation. There is great diversity of size, form, leaf and bark type among eucalypts. Eucalypts have many commercial uses. An important source of wood products in Australia, they are also the world’s most widely-planted hardwoods. Large areas are being grown in Brazil, South Africa, India, China and elsewhere mainly for pulp and paper production. Species featured in this walk have been selected to illustrate the diversity and many uses of eucalypts. Acknowledgements This walk has been supported by the Bjarne K. Dahl Trust (www.dahltrust.org.au) a philanthropic fund. Dahl was a Norwegian forester who developed a great affinity with the Australian Bush and left his entire estate to establish a fund which focuses solely on eucalypts. Funds have also been provided by the Public Fund of the Friends of the Australian National Botanic Gardens (www.friendsanbg.org.au).
    [Show full text]
  • Agathis Macrophylla Araucariaceae (Lindley) Masters
    Agathis macrophylla (Lindley) Masters Araucariaceae LOCAL NAMES English (pacific kauri); Fijian (da‘ua,dakua dina,makadri,makadre,takua makadre,dakua,dakua makadre) BOTANIC DESCRIPTION Agathis macrophylla is a tall tree typically to about 30–40 m tall, 3 m in bole diameter, with a broad canopy of up to 36 m diameter. Branches may be erect to horizontal and massive. Mature specimens have wide, spreading root systems whereas seedlings and young specimens have a vigorous taproot with one or more whorls of lateral roots. Leaves simple, entire, elliptic to lanceolate, leathery, and dark green, and shiny above and often glaucous below; about 7–15 cm long and 2–3.5 cm wide, with many close inconspicuous parallel veins. The leaves taper to a more or less pointed tip, rounded at the base, with the margins curved down at the edge. Petioles short, from almost sessile up to 5 mm long. Cones egg-shaped at the end of the first year, about 5 cm long, and 3 cm in diameter, more or less round at the end of the second year, 8–10 cm in diameter. Female cones much larger than males, globular, on thick woody stalks, green, slightly glaucous, turning brownish during ripening. Seeds brown, small, ovoid to globose, flattened, winged, and attached to a triangular cone scale about 2.5 cm across. BIOLOGY Pacific kauri is monoecious and produces cones instead of flowers. The first female cones begin to be produced at about 10 years old and take up to 2 years to mature (more often in 12-15 months).
    [Show full text]
  • (Myrtaceae) from Borneo
    Gardens' Bulletin Singapore 57 (2005) 269-278 269 New Tristaniopsis Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. (Myrtaceae) From Borneo P. S. ASHTON Arnold Arboretum, Harvard University, 22 Divinity Avenue Cambridge MA 02138, U.S.A. and Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AB, U.K. Abstract Three new species, Tristaniopsis kinabaluensis P.S.Ashton, T. microcmpa P.S.Ashton and T. wbiginosa S.Teo ex P.S.Ashton, and three new subspecies, Tristaniopsis kinabaluensis ssp. silamensis P.S.Ashton, T. merguensis ssp. tavaiensis P.S.Ashton and T. whitiana ssp. monostemon P.S.Aston, are described from northern Borneo, in preparation for a treatment of the Myrtaceae for the Tree Flora of Sabah and Sarawak. Introduction Species definition in Tristaniopsis Peter G.Wilson & J.T.Waterh. (formerly Tristania R. Br.) has proven to be even more difficult in Borneo than among the notorious and much larger myrtaceous genus Syzygium Gaertn. Leaf size and shape is variable. The number of stamens, which are clustered opposite the petals, is characteristic of each species but, although at most 10 per cluster, may vary in exceptional cases. Here, we adopt a conservative species concept, awaiting regional monographic and phylogenetic research. Eventually, and with further flowering collections, some at least of the infrapecific taxa described here may be raised to species rank. All specimens examined have been at the Kew herbarium unless otherwise stated. 1. Tristaniopsis kinabaluensis P.S.Ashton, sp. llOV. T. m.erguensis affinis, foliis minoribus basim versus subsessilibus attenuatis vel anguste obtusis baud auriculatis, subtus hebete glaucescentibus, staminibus 3(-5) in fasciculis, fructibus ad 5 x 4 mm minoribus facile 270 Card.
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents Below) with Family Name Provided
    1 Australian Plants Society Plant Table Profiles – Sutherland Group (updated August 2021) Below is a progressive list of all cultivated plants from members’ gardens and Joseph Banks Native Plants Reserve that have made an appearance on the Plant Table at Sutherland Group meetings. Links to websites are provided for the plants so that further research can be done. Plants are grouped in the categories of: Trees and large shrubs (woody plants generally taller than 4 m) Medium to small shrubs (woody plants from 0.1 to 4 m) Ground covers or ground-dwelling (Grasses, orchids, herbaceous and soft-wooded plants, ferns etc), as well as epiphytes (eg: Platycerium) Vines and scramblers Plants are in alphabetical order by botanic names within plants categories (see table of contents below) with family name provided. Common names are included where there is a known common name for the plant: Table of Contents Trees and Large shrubs........................................................................................................................... 2 Medium to small shrubs ...................................................................................................................... 23 Groundcovers and other ground‐dwelling plants as well as epiphytes. ............................................ 64 Vines and Scramblers ........................................................................................................................... 86 Sutherland Group http://sutherland.austplants.com.au 2 Trees and Large shrubs Acacia decurrens
    [Show full text]
  • The Nature of Naming What’S in a Name?
    The Nature of Naming What’s in a Name? • "A rose is a rose," it has been said • And most of us know a rose when we see one • As we know the African marigolds • Maples, elms, cedars, and pines that shade our backyards and line our streets What’s in a Name? • We usually call these plants by their common names • But if we wanted to know more about the cedar tree in our front yard, we would find that "cedar" may refer to: – Eastern red cedar What’s in a Name? • Incense cedar What’s in a Name? • Western red cedar What’s in a Name? • Atlantic white cedar What’s in a Name? • Spanish cedar What’s in a Name? • Biblical Lebanon cedar What’s in a Name? • In fact, we would find that cedars are found in three separate plant families What’s in a Name? • Later, after discovering that our "African" marigolds are in fact from Mexico and our "Spanish" cedar originated in the West Indies, we would realize how misleading the common names of plants can be. What’s in a Name? • The same plant can have many different common names – European white lily has at least 245 – Marsh marigold has at least 280 What’s in a Name? • Clearly, if we use only the common name of a plant, we cannot be sure of understanding very much about that plant Classification • It is for this reason that the scientific community prefers to use a more precise way of naming, or classification • Scientific classification, however, is more than just naming: it is a key to understanding • Botanists name a plant to give it a unique place in the biological world, as well as to clarify its relationships within that world How Are Plants Classified? • Science classifies living things in an orderly system through which they can be easily identified – Categories of increasing size, based upon relationships within those categories How Are Plants Classified? • For example, all plants can be put in order from the more primitive to the more advanced.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Plant Collection and Identification
    GUIDE TO PLANT COLLECTION AND IDENTIFICATION by Jane M. Bowles PhD Originally prepared for a workshop in Plant Identification for the Ministry of Natural Resources in 1982. Edited and revised for the UWO Herbarium Workshop in Plant Collection and Identification, 2004 © Jane M. Bowles, 2004 -0- CHAPTER 1 THE NAMES OF PLANTS The history of plant nomenclature: Humans have always had a need to classify objects in the world about them. It is the only means they have of acquiring and passing on knowledge. The need to recognize and describe plants has always been especially important because of their use for food and medicinal purposes. The commonest, showiest or most useful plants were given common names, but usually these names varied from country to country and often from district to district. Scholars and herbalists knew the plants by a long, descriptive, Latin sentence. For example Cladonia rangiferina, the common "Reindeer Moss", was described as Muscus coralloides perforatum (The perforated, coral-like moss). Not only was this system unwieldy, but it too varied from user to user and with the use of the plant. In the late 16th century, Casper Bauhin devised a system of using just two names for each plant, but it was not universally adopted until the Swedish naturalist, Carl Linnaeus (1707-1778) set about methodically classifying and naming the whole of the natural world. The names of plants: In 1753, Linnaeus published his "Species Plantarum". The modern names of nearly all plants date from this work or obey the conventions laid down in it. The scientific name for an organism consists of two words: i) the genus or generic name, ii) the specific epithet.
    [Show full text]
  • Podocarpus Totara
    Mike Marden and Chris Phillips [email protected] TTotaraotara Podocarpus totara INTRODUCTION AND METHODS Reasons for planting native trees include the enhancement of plant and animal biodiversity for conservation, establishment of a native cover on erosion-prone sites, improvement of water quality by revegetation of riparian areas and management for production of high quality timber. Signifi cant areas of the New Zealand landscape, both urban and rural, are being re-vegetated using native species. Many such plantings are on open sites where the aim is to quickly achieve canopy closure and often includes the planting of a mixture of shrubs and tree species concurrently. Previously, data have been presented showing the potential above- and below-ground growth performance of eleven native plant species considered typical early colonisers of bare ground, particularly in riparian areas (http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/land/Trial1results.asp). In this current series of posters we present data on the growth performance of six native conifer (kauri, rimu, totara, matai, miro, kahikatea) and two broadleaved hardwood (puriri, titoki) species most likely to succeed the early colonising species to become a major component in mature stands of indigenous forest (http://icm.landcareresearch.co.nz/research/land/ Trial2.asp). Data on the potential above- and below-ground early growth performance of colonising shrubby species together with that of conifer and broadleaved species will help land managers and community groups involved in re-vegetation projects in deciding the plant spacing and species mix most appropriate for the scale of planting and best suited to site conditions. Data are from a trial established in 2006 to assess the relative growth performance of native conifer and broadleaved hardwood tree species.
    [Show full text]