MISSISSIPPIAN CHERT, OKLAHOMA by MIN ZHAO Bachelor
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
PETROLOGIC AND PETROPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS: MISSISSIPPIAN CHERT, OKLAHOMA By MIN ZHAO Bachelor of Science in Geology China University of Petroleum (Beijing) Beijing, China 2009 Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate College of the Oklahoma State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December, 2011 PETROLOGIC AND PETROPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS: MISSISSIPPIAN CHERT, OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Dr. Darwin R. Boardman II Thesis Adviser Dr. James Puckette Dr. Jay M. Gregg Dr. Mark E. Payton Dean of the Graduate College ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................1 Purpose of study.......................................................................................................1 Objective ..................................................................................................................2 Methods....................................................................................................................2 Previous Work..........................................................................................................3 II. GEOLOGICAL BACKGROUND ............................................................................6 Geological Setting....................................................................................................6 Stratigraphy ..............................................................................................................8 III. PETROLOGIC CHARACTERISTICS OF MISSISSIPPIAN CHERT AND MISSISSIPPIAN CHERTY LIMESTONE ...........................................................10 Lithology of Mississippian Chert...........................................................................10 Mississippian Cherty Limestone ............................................................................25 Comparison between the Mississippian Chert and Mississippian Cherty Limestone ................................................................................................................................37 Pore System............................................................................................................44 IV. PETROPHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MISSISSIPPIAN CHERT48 Porosity and Permeability ......................................................................................48 Bulk Density ..........................................................................................................52 Well Log Characteristics Associated with Core ....................................................55 V. DISCUSSION ........................................................................................................58 Origin of Silica.......................................................................................................58 Origin of Silt ..........................................................................................................62 iii Chapter Page Diagenesis ..............................................................................................................62 Possible Controls on Petrophysical Properties ......................................................68 VI. CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................................................70 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................73 iv LIST OF TABLES Table Page I. Porosity, permeability, and density of Mississippian chert from core plugs and thin sections,. ......................................................................................................... 49 II. Bulk density, and rock density of Mississippian chert from core plugs and thin sections………………………………………………………………………………..52 III. Comparison of petrophysical properties between Mississippian chert and cherty limestone and possible controls.. ....................................................................... 68 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1. Location of the Nemaha Uplift, Cherokee Platform, and core wells. ............................. 7 2. Stratigraphic column in study area. Modified from Mazzullo et al. (2011). .................. 9 3. Petrolog of the Mississippian chert. .............................................................................. 11 4. Core photographs of the tripolitic chert. ....................................................................... 14 5. Thin section photomicrographs of the lower tripolitic zone ......................................... 15 6. Core photographs of LC cherty limestone. ................................................................... 17 7. Thin section photomicrographs of LC cherty limestone............................................... 18 8. Core photographs of less weathered chert. ................................................................... 20 9. Thin section photomicrographs of less weathered chert. .............................................. 21 10. Core photographs of the upper tripolitic chert. ........................................................... 23 11. Thin section photomicrographs of the upper tripolitic chert.. .................................... 24 12. Petrolog of the Mississippian Limestone .................................................................... 26 13. Core photographys of lithofacies 1and 2. ................................................................... 30 14. Thin section photomicrographs of lithofacies 1.......................................................... 30 15. Thin section photomicrographs of lithofacies 2.......................................................... 31 16. Thin section photomicrographs of lithofacies 3.......................................................... 31 17. Core photograph and thin section photomicrographs of lithofacies 3. ....................... 32 18. Core photograph of lithofacies 4 and 5. ...................................................................... 33 19. Thin section photomicrographs of lithofacies 4 and 5. ............................................... 34 20. Thin section photomicrographs of spiculites, and partially replaced bioclasts..……35 21. Core photographs and thin section photomicrographs of lithofacies 6....................... 36 vi Figure Page 22. Thin section photomicrographs of the tripolitic chert, less weathered chert, and cherty limestone. .......................................................................................................................... 38 23. Core photographs of the Mississippian chert and cherty limestone. .......................... 41 24. Thin section photomicrographs of spiculites in Mississippian cherty limestone and the tripolitic chert in the Mississippian chert. ......................................................................... 42 25. Thin section photomicrographs of bioclasts in micritic matrix. ................................. 43 26. Thin section photomicrographs of micro and spicular-moldic porosity. .................... 46 27. Thin section photomicrographs of vuggy and fracture porosity. ................................ 47 28. Crossplot of porosity and permeability. ...................................................................... 50 29. Core measured porosity, permeability, density, rock density and chert clasts/matrix ratio for the Mississippian chert........................................................................................ 51 30. Calculated bulk density and rock density and bulk density from well logs................ 53 31. Correlation of well log responses to rock attributes determined by core plug analysis. ........................................................................................................................................... 57 32. Thin section photomicrographs showing dissolution of siliceous spicules. ............... 60 33. Thin section photomicrographs showing the abundance and distribution of spicules in the entirely silicified and slightly silicified zones............................................................. 61 34. Thin section photomicrographs of multiple generations of chertification. ................. 66 35. Thin section photomicrographs showing carbonate in chert. ..................................... 67 36. Thin section photomicrographs showing the selective removal of silica. .................. 67 vii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Purpose of Study The Mississippian chat is an informal name widely used by the petroleum industry. It is a weathered and/or detrital interval of highly porous or hard, low porosity chert at or near the top of the Osagean, Mississippian Series. Chat generally occurs along the unconformity between the Pennsylvanian and Mississippian subsystems in north- central Oklahoma and south-central Kansas (Rogers, 2001). The weathered chert reservoirs in the Mississippian chat can be highly porous and permeable, which makes them significant products of oil and gas. The Mississippian chat has been explored and developed for more than 80 years, but the origin of silica is still poorly understood, sources of silica in the chert have not been confirmed, and the formation of the chert is debated. Since Mississippian “chat” is an informal name, “chert” will be used in place of it in this study. The purpose of this study is to analyze selected samples of the Mississippian chert and (1) confirm sources of silica; (2) provide rock architecture and petrophysical