(Orchidaceae). Ii

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

(Orchidaceae). Ii Neodiversity 5: 13–17 www.neodiversity.org 31st Dec 2010 EW COMBIATIOS I THE GEUS CATTLEYA (ORCHIDACEAE). II. CORRECTIOS AD COMBIATIOS FOR HYBRID TAXA C. VAN DEN BERG1 1Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Av. Transnordestina, s.n., 44036-900, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil. e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT In the present article two new combinations for species and 43 combinations for nothospecies in Cattleya are proposed, based on molecular phylogenetic analyses which support the inclusion of Sophronitis in Cattleya. A recent article (van den Berg, 2008) van den Berg (2008). The combination explained the need of merging Sophronitis proposed for Sophronitis cernua (Lindl.) with Cattleya, due to recent molecular W.J.Hook was invalid because the phylogenetic analyses (van den Berg, 2009; basionym used by van den Berg (2008) was van den Berg et al., 2009). This would be itself a combination, and therefore we preferrable than splitting Cattleya into propose here the new combination again, smaller units, which would produce many this time with the correct basionym to naturally occurring hybrid genera and many validate this name. thousands of them to classify commercial hybrids. As a result, new combinations for Cattleya cernua (Lindl.) Van den Berg, species previously placed in Sophronitis, comb. nov. Hoffmannseggella and other genera of Basionym: Sophronia cernua Lindl., Bot. Chiron & V.P.Castro (2002) were proposed Reg. 13: t. 1129. 1828 in Cattleya (van den Berg, 2008). The new circumscription was adopted in 2009 by the Cattleya kleberi (F.E.L.Miranda) Van den American Orchid Society and Royal Berg, comb. nov. Horticultural Society for the registration of Basionym: Hoffmanseggella kleberi F.E.L. artificial hybrids, and incorporated into the Miranda, Orchids 74(6): 458. 2005. World Checklist of Selected Plant Families (Govaerts et al., 2010). In the current article NEW COMBINATIONS FOR NATURALLY we propose new combinations missing OCCURRING HYBRIDS combinations of species and for most Among the binomials for nothospecies of naturally occurring hybrids within Cattleya Laelia, ×Encylaelia and ×Schombocattleya, and between Cattleya and other genera, the following list of combinations is which are required due to the new proposed, based on putative naturally taxonomic circumscription. occurring taxa. Natural occurrence was based on Pabst & Dungs (1975, 1977), van NEW COMBINATIONS FOR SPECIES den Berg & Chase (2000) and field and A combination for Hoffmannseggella herbarium work. The nomen novum for kleberi F.E.L.Miranda was overlooked by Schombocattleya ×felix honors Lou C. 13 VAN DEN BERG - NEW COMBINATIONS IN CATTLEYA. II Menezes for her contribution to the Cattleya ×carassana (Pabst) Van den Berg, knowledge of natural hybrids in Cattleya. comb. nov. Basionym: Laelia ×carassana Pabst, Bradea Cattleya ×adrienne (Rolfe) Van den Berg, 2: 22. 1975. comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya caulescens × Basionym: Laelia ×adrienne Rolfe, Orchid. Cattleya longipes Rev. 16: 31.1908. Parentage: Cattleya pumila × Cattleya ×cattleyioides (A.Rich) Van den Cattleya jongheana Berg, comb. nov. Basionym: Laelia ×cattleyioides A. Rich., Cattleya ×albanensis (Rolfe) Van den Berg, Hort. Universel 5: 206. 1843. comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya loddigesii × Cattleya Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×albanensis lundii Rolfe, Gard. Chron., ser. 3, 14: 584. 1893. Cattleya silvana Pabst, Bradea 2(12): 68. Cattleya ×cipoensis (Pabst) Van den Berg, 1976. comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya grandis × Cattleya Basionym: Laelia ×cipoensis Pabst, Bradea warneri 2: 14. 1975. Parentage: Cattleya ghillanyi × Cattleya Cattleya ×amanda (Rchb.f.) Van den Berg, rupestris comb. nov. Basionym: Laelia ×amanda Rchb.f., Gard. Cattleya ×cristinae (F.E.LMiranda & Chron. , n.s., 18: 776. 1882. K.G.Lacerda) Van den berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya lobata × Cattleya Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×cristinae intermedia F.E.L.Miranda & K.G.Lacerda, Orchids 72: 853. 2003. Cattleya ×binotii (Cogn.) Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya briegeri × Cattleya comb. nov. rupestris Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya binotii Cogn., Gard. Chron., ser. 3, 28: 370. 1900. Cattleya ×cypheri (Rolfe) Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya pumila × Cattleya comb. nov. bicolor Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×cypheri Rolfe, Orchid Rev. 5: 313. 1897. Cattleya ×britoi (K.G.Lacerda & V.P. Castro) Parentage: Cattleya purpurata × Cattleya Van den Berg, comb. nov. forbesii Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×britoi K.G. Lacerda & V.P.Castro, Richardiana 5(1): 20. Cattleya ×ericoi (V.P.Castro) Van den Berg, 2005. comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya rupestris × Cattleya Basionym: ×Hadrocattleya ×ericoi V.P. mirandae Castro, Richardiana 9(1): 31. 2008. Parentage: Cattleya warneri × Cattleya Cattleya ×caetensis (Pabst) Van den Berg, praestans comb. nov. Basionym: Laelia ×caetensis Pabst, Bradea 2: 50. 1975. Cattleya ×feldmanniana (F.E.L.Miranda & Parentage: Cattleya crispata × Cattleya K.G.Lacerda) Van den Berg, comb. nov. rupestris Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×feldmaniana 14 VAN DEN BERG - NEW COMBINATIONS IN CATTLEYA. II F.E.L.Miranda & K.G.Lacerda, Orchids 72: Cattleya ×lilacina (F.A.Philbrick ex H.J. 854. 2003. Veitch) Van den Berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya pabstii × Cattleya Basionym: Laelia ×lilacina Philbrick ex endsfeldzii H.J.Veitch, Man. Orch. Pl. 2: 89. 1887 Parentage: Cattleya crispa × Cattleya Cattleya ×gehrard-santosii (Pabst) Van den perrini Berg, comb. nov. Basionym: Laelia ×gehrard-santosii Pabst, Cattleya ×mucugensis (F.E.L.Miranda) Van Bradea 2: 16. 1975. den Berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya harpophylla × Basionym: Laelia ×mucugensis F.E.L. Cattleya neokautskyi Miranda, Bradea 6: 159. 1993. Parentage: Cattleya luetzelburgii × Cattleya ×gottoiana (Rolfe) Van den Berg, Cattleya pfisteri comb. nov. Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya gottoiana Rolfe, Cattleya ×neocalimaniana Van den Berg, Gard. Chron., ser. 3, 18: 467. 1895. nom. nov. Parentage: Cattleya tenebrosa × Cattleya Basionym: ×Hadrocattleya ×calimaniana warneri V.P. Castro & K.G.Lacerda, Richardiana 5(2): 98. 2005. Cattleya ×heitoriana (Campacci) Van den Parentage: Cattleya grandis × Cattleya Berg, comb. nov. amethystoglossa Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×heitoriana Campacci, Colet. Orquid. Bras. 5: 162. 2007. Cattleya ×neocalimaniorum Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya itambana × Cattleya nom. nov. ghillanyi Basionym: Hadrolaelia ×calimaniorum K.G. Lacerda & V.P.Castro, Richardiana 5(4): Cattleya ×itabiritensis (K.G.Lacerda) Van 198. 2005. den Berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya praestans × Cattleya Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×itabiritensis xanthina K.G.Lacerda, Richardiana 6(2): 63. 2006. Parentage: Cattleya fournieri × Cattleya Cattleya ×neoreginae Van den Berg, nom. caulescens nov. Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×reginae Pabst, Cattleya ×jetibaensis (V.P.Castro & G.F. Bradea 2: 280. 1978. Carr) Van den Berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya sincorana × Cattleya Basionym: ×Hadrodungsia ×jetibaensis elongata V.P.Castro & G.F.Carr, Richardiana 8(4): 194. 2008. Cattleya ×neoschilleriana Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya harpophylla × nom. nov. Cattleya wittigiana Basionym: Laelia ×schilleriana Rchb.f., Allg. Gartenz. 23: 323. 1855. Cattleya ×lambari (Pabst) Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya purpurata × comb. nov. Cattleya intermedia Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×lambari Pabst, Bradea 2(4): 14. 1975. Cattleya ×occhioniana (Brade) Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya crispata × Cattleya comb. nov. loddigesii Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×occhioniana 15 VAN DEN BERG - NEW COMBINATIONS IN CATTLEYA. II Brade, Orquídea 6: 133. 1944. Cattleya ×zaslawskiana (Chiron & V.P. Parentage: Cattleya perrinii × Cattleya Castro) Van den Berg, comb. nov. harrisoniana Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×zaslawskiana Chiron & V.P.Castro, Richardiana 5(2): 63. Cattleya ×porphyritis (Rchb.f.) Van den 2005. Berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya briegeri × Cattleya Basionym: Laelia ×porphyritis Rchb.f., rupestris Gard. Chron., n.s., 25: 72. 1886. Parentage: Cattleya pumila × Cattleya Cattleya ×zaslawskii (L.C.Men.) Van den dormaniana Berg, comb. nov. Basionym: Laelia ×zaslawskii L.C.Men., Cattleya ×raganii (F.E.L.Miranda & Orchidee (Hamburg) 47: 259. 1996. K.G.Lacerda) Van den Berg, comb. nov. Parentage: Cattleya praestans × Cattleya Basionym: Hoffmannseggella ×raganii F.E.L. harpophylla Miranda & K.G.Lacerda, Orchids 72(11): 856. 2003. ×Catyclia×intermedia (F.E.L.Miranda) Van den Parentage: Cattleya rupestris × Cattleya Berg, comb. nov. bradei Basionym: ×Encylaelia ×intermedia F.E.L. Miranda, Albertoa 3: 94. 1991. Cattleya ×rigbyana (Pabst) Van den Berg, Parentage: Encyclia seidelii × Cattleya comb. nov. rupestris Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×rigbyana Pabst, Orchid. Rev. 83: 212. 1975. ×Laeliocattleya ×calimaniana (L.C.Menezes) Parentage: Cattleya pumila × Cattleya Van den Berg, comb. nov. schilleriana Basionym: ×Schombocattleya ×calimaniana L.C.Men., Orquidário 16: 60. 2002. Cattleya ×sgarbii (Ruschi) Van den Berg, Parentage: Laelia gloriosa × Cattleya comb. nov. guttata Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×sgarbii Ruschi, Orquídea(Brasil) 12: 48. 1950. ×Laeliocattleya ×menezesiana Van den Berg, Parentage: Cattleya pumila × Cattleya comb. nov. warneri Basionym: ×Schombocattleya ×felix L.C. Menezes, Bol. CAOB 34: 128. 1998. Cattleya ×verelii (Rolfe) Van den Berg, Parentage: Laelia gloriosa × Cattleya comb. nov. walkeriana Basionym: ×Laeliocattleya ×verelii Rolfe, Orchid Rev. 7: 340. 1899. ×Laeliocattleya ×micheliniana (Campacci) Van Parentage: Cattleya lobata × Cattleya den Berg, comb. nov. forbesii Basionym:
Recommended publications
  • The Atlanta Orchid Society Bulletin
    The Atlanta Orchid Society Bulletin Affiliated with the American Orchid Society, the Orchid Digest Corporation and the Mid-America Orchid Congress 2001 Recipient of the American Orchid Society’s Distinguished Affiliated Societies Service Award Newsletter Editor: Danny Lentz Society Librarian: Elaine Jacobson Volume 45: Number 7 www.altantaorchidsociety.org July 2004 JULY EVENTS The Meeting: 8:00 PM Monday, July 12, 2004, Atlanta Botanical Garden - Day Hall Mr. Mark Rose, Breckinridge Orchids Mark Rose, the owner of Breckinridge Orchids in North Carolina, will present a wonderful slide show on species Paphiopedilums and will talk about their culture. Mark is well known for his work in Paphs and Phalaenopsis; and, since he grows in a climate similar to Atlanta, he should have a lot of useful information that Atlanta members can apply. He will be bringing plants for sale. You can order plants by phone at 336-656-7991. His website does not appear to be working (www.breckinridgeorchids.com). The cutoff date for preorders is July 8. Inside This Issue Atlanta Orchid Society 2004 Officers…………………………………………..….…………… Page 2 Collector’s Item……Encyclia cordigera (H.B.K.) Dressler……Ron McHatton…..………... Page 2 Events Out and About………………Dates for your Calendar…………...……….…….……… Page 3 Minutes of the June Meeting ………………..….…….…...……….………….…………….… Page 3 The June Exhibition Table (with notes by Ron McHatton)….………………………………..... Page 4 Recent AOS Awards from the Atlanta Judging Center…………………………………………. Page 7 American Cattleyas – book info……………………………………………………………….. Page 9 Second Quarter Exhibition Table Results, Notices……………………………………….……. Page 10 Understanding pH Management and Plant Nutrition part 4 : Substrates…….Bill Argo …….... After Page 10 All contents © Atlanta Orchid Society unless otherwise noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Über Selbstbestäubung Bei Den Orchideen
    Ober Selbstbestaubung bei den Orchideen. Von O. von Kirchner. Die Familie del' Orchidaceen gilt seit dem Erscheinen von D a I' win s beriihmtem Buch iiber ihre Bestiiubungseinrichtungen (4) als klassisches Beispiel fiir die Vermeidung bestandiger Selbstbefruchtung. In del' Tat sind die Bliiten del' Orchideen im allgemeinen in aus­ gezeichneter Weise herkogam, und die Einwirkung del' Bestiiubungs­ organe derselben Bliite aufeinander ist durch ihre gegenseitige Lage, besonders durch die Ausbildung des die Pollenmassen von den Narben­ fHichen trennenden Rostellums, del' Regel nach verhindert. Wohl kannte schon Dar win einige Ausnahmen von del' gewohnIichen Fremdbestaubung und meint selbst (4 a, 250), daB sich ohne Zweifel mit del' Zeit deren noch mehr finden wiirden, abel' er betont doch ihre SeItenheit und die MogIichkeit des Eintretens von Fremdbestiiubung nicht nul' bei gelegent­ licher, sondeI'll auch in den Fallen habitueller Selbstbestaubung. Er fiihrt "eine Liste von ungefiihr 10 Spezies an, welche aHem Anscheine nach sich selbst voIIstiindig befruchten Mnnen, und ungefiihr derselben Anzahl von Spezies, welche sich unvollstiindig befruchten, wenn Insekten ausgeschlossen werden". I. Vorkommen der Antogamie. Spatere Untersuchungen und die sich mehrende Kenntnis neuer auBereuropaischer Orchideen-Arten haben die Zahl del' Arten, bei den en Selbstbestaubung vorkommt, bedeutend vergroBert, so daB eine kritische Zusammenstellung diesel' FaIle geeignet sein wird, die iibliche Meinung von del' "Vermeidung del' Selbstbestaubung" bei del' genannten Pflanzen­ familie auf das richtige MaB zuriickzufiihren. Aus dem Bereich del' europiiischen Orchideen, deren Arten­ zahl rund 100 betragt, werden in DarwinsWerk sechs FaIle von regel­ miiBiger (1-6) und drei FaIle von gelegentlicher Selbstbestiiubung (7 -9) erwiihnt, niimlich: I Flora, Bd.
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal De Pernambuco Centro De Ciências Biológicas Programa De Pós-Graduação Em Biologia Vegetal
    UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE PERNAMBUCO CENTRO DE CIÊNCIAS BIOLÓGICAS PROGRAMA DE PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO EM BIOLOGIA VEGETAL ORCHIDACEAE NO PARQUE NACIONAL DO VIRUÁ, RR, BRASIL: ASPECTOS TAXONÔMICOS E BIOGEOGRÁFICOS EDLLEY MAX PESSOA Orientador: Prof. Marccus Alves Co-orientador: Prof. Fábio de Barros Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, como parte dos requisitos para obtenção do título de Mestre em Biologia Vegetal. RECIFE 2013 Catalogação na fonte Elaine Barroso CRB 1728 Pessoa, Edlley Max Orchidaceae no Parque Nacional do Viruá, RR, Brasil: aspectos taxonômicos e biogeográficos/ Edlley Max Pessoa– Recife: O Autor, 2013. 167 folhas : il., fig., tab. Orientador: Marccus Alves Coorientador: Fábio de Barros Dissertação (mestrado) – Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências Biológicas, Biologia Vegetal, 2013. Inclui bibliografia 1. Orquídeas 2. Amazonia 3. Monocotiledôneas I. Alves, Marccus (orientador) II. Barros, Fábio de (coorientador) III. Título 584.4 CDD (22.ed.) UFPE/CCB- 2013- 223 EDLLEY MAX PESSOA ORCHIDACEAE NO PARQUE NACIONAL DO VIRUÁ, RR, BRASIL: ASPECTOS TAXONÔMICOS E BIOGEOGRÁFICOS Dissertação Apresentada à Banca Examinadora: ____________________________________________ Orientador: Prof. Dr. Marccus Alves Departamento de Botânica – UFPE ____________________________________________ 1º Examinador: Prof. William Wayt Thomas New York Botanical Garden ____________________________________________ 2º Examinador: Prof. Rafael Batista Louzada Departamento de Botânica – UFPE ____________________________________________ 1º Suplente: Prof. Maria Regina Barbosa Departamento de Botânica - UFPB ____________________________________________ 2º Suplente: Prof. Maria Jesus Nogueira Rodal Departamento de Botânica - UFRPE “esta obra há de servir também a alguém, senão pra aprender ao menos pra corrigir”. F.C. Hoehne AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço primeiramente aos meus pais, que mesmo em diversas turbulências ocorridas nesses 23 anos, mantiveram um padrão de excelência para minha educação.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Index - Printed on 10/13/2014 Page 1
    Classification Index - Printed On 10/13/2014 Page 1 Reference Classification Description 001 Open Competition - Commercial Growers Display of 1-24 Orchid Plants in flower by a Commercial Grower 002 Open Competition - Commercial Grower Display of 25 or more Orchid Plants in flower by a Commercial Grower 003 Open Competition - Orchid Societies Display of any number of Orchid Plants in flower by an Orchid Society 004 Open Competition - Non-Commercial Growers Display of any number of Orchid Plants in flower by a Non-Commercial grower but not an Orchid Society 005 Open Competition - Educational Educational exhibits, any size 006 Open Competition - Artwork Display of artwork of any type, any size 007 Open Competition - Cut Flower & Floral Arrangement Display of cut flowers and floral arrangements containing orchids, any size 008 Blank Class 009 Blank Class 010 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Epidendrum species 011 Cattleya Alliance(Laeliinae) Encyclia species 012 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Epidendrum and Encyclia hybrids and intergeneric hybrids with any genera INCLUDING Cattleya 013 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Brassovola and Rhyncholaelia species, hybrids, and intergeneric hybrids other than above but EXCLUDING Cattleya, e.g.Bl, Rl 014 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Laelia species, hybrids, and intergeneric hybrids other than above but EXCLUDING Cattleya Classification Index - Printed On 10/13/2014 Page 2 Reference Classification Description 015 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Sophronitis species, hybrids, and intergeneric hybrids other than above but EXCLUDING Cattleya 016 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Schomburgkia species, hybrids, and intergeneric hybrids other than above INCLUDING Cattleya, ex. Schombocattleya 017 Cattleya Alliance (Laeliinae) Broughtonia species, hybrids, and intergeneric hybrids other than above INCLUDING Cattleya, ex.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix: Orchid Potting Mixtures - an Abridged Historical Review 1
    Appendix: Orchid potting mixtures - An abridged historical review 1 T. J. SHEEHAN Introduction There is little doubt that potting media development over time has been the salvation of orchid growers (Bomba, 1975). When epiphytic orchids were first introduced into England and other European countries in the 18th century growers could not envision plants growing in anything but soil. '"Peat and loam' were good for everything and frequently became the mass murderers of the first generation of epiphytic orchids," Hooker is believed to have said around the end of the 19th century; England had become the graveyard of tropical orchids. Undoubtedly this was in reference to the concern individuals were having over the potting media problems. This problem also drew the attention of such noted individuals as John Lindley and Sir Joseph Paxton, as well as the Gardener's Chronicle, who noted that "The Rule of Thumb" had nothing to say about orchid growing; it was only effective in orchid killing (Bomba 1975). Fortunately, the ingenuity of growers solved the problem as innovative potting mixes evolved over the years. After visiting a number of orchid growing establishments it immediately becomes obvious to any orchid grower, professional or hobbyist, that orchids, both epiphytic and terrestrial, will grow in a wide variety of media. It has often been stated that epiphytic orchids can be grown in any medium except soil as long as watering and fertilization are adjusted to fit the mix being used. Ter­ restrial orchids seem to thrive in any medium that contains 40% or more organic matter. Reading cultural recommendations from the early days of orchid growing is most interesting and highly recommended.
    [Show full text]
  • A Guide to a Successful Orchid Show American Orchid Society
    A Guide to a Successful Orchid Show American Orchid Society A Guide to a Successful Orchid Show Developed by Edna K. Hamilton Past President, St. Croix Orchid Society Member, AOS Affiliated Societies Committee Edited by Gayle Brodie AOS Affiliated Societies Committee 1st Edition - 1/10/2016 American Orchid Society A GUIDE TO A SUCCESSFUL ORCHID SHOW Table of Contents I. Some Suggestions for Orchid Societies .......................................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 4 1.2 The Orchid Exhibition ......................................................................... 4 II. Planning an Orchid Show ............................................................................ 5 2.1 Introduction ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 Nature of the Show ............................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Exhibition Format ......................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Sales............................................................................................. 6 2.2.3 Theme .......................................................................................... 7 2.3 Time and Season for a Show............................................................ 7 2.5 AOS Judging ....................................................................................... 8 III. Organizing an Orchid Show.......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PC25 Doc. 32.2
    Original language: English PC25 Doc. 32.2 CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA ___________________ Twenty-fifth meeting of the Plants Committee Online, 2-4, 21 and 23 June 2021 Species specific matters Maintenance of the Appendices Orchids checklists APPENDIX-II ORCHID CHECKLIST 1. This document has been submitted by the Scientific Authority for Flora of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.* 2. The context of this document pertains to PC24 Com. 8 (Rev. by Sec.). The UK Scientific Authority and the United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) were to prepare a checklist for Orchidaceae, presenting Appendix I and Appendix II species separately. a) This was to be undertaken by generating an output for Orchidaceae from the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. The output includes accepted names, synonyms and country-level distribution information. b) The dataset for Orchidaceae was provided by The World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. The World Checklist of Selected Plant Families has become an international collaborative programme with more than 150 contributors from 22 countries. The main goal of the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families is to provide high quality peer reviewed baseline data on all accepted taxa included in each family. c) To make the review of proposed changes manageable, a comparison was undertaken between the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families output and the current CITES nomenclature standard references for Orchidaceae. 3. The Appendix I Orchid Checklist was adopted at the 18th CITES Conference of the Parties (Switzerland, 2019). This checklist and the proposed checklist were compiled using the same methodology.
    [Show full text]
  • Plano De Manejo Do Parque Nacional Do Viruâ
    PLANO DE MANEJO DO PARQUE NACIONAL DO VIRU Boa Vista - RR Abril - 2014 PRESIDENTE DA REPÚBLICA Dilma Rousseff MINISTÉRIO DO MEIO AMBIENTE Izabella Teixeira - Ministra INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE - ICMBio Roberto Ricardo Vizentin - Presidente DIRETORIA DE CRIAÇÃO E MANEJO DE UNIDADES DE CONSERVAÇÃO - DIMAN Giovanna Palazzi - Diretora COORDENAÇÃO DE ELABORAÇÃO E REVISÃO DE PLANOS DE MANEJO Alexandre Lantelme Kirovsky CHEFE DO PARQUE NACIONAL DO VIRUÁ Antonio Lisboa ICMBIO 2014 PARQUE NACIONAL DO VIRU PLANO DE MANEJO CRÉDITOS TÉCNICOS E INSTITUCIONAIS INSTITUTO CHICO MENDES DE CONSERVAÇÃO DA BIODIVERSIDADE - ICMBio Diretoria de Criação e Manejo de Unidades de Conservação - DIMAN Giovanna Palazzi - Diretora EQUIPE TÉCNICA DO PLANO DE MANEJO DO PARQUE NACIONAL DO VIRUÁ Coordenaço Antonio Lisboa - Chefe do PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Msc. Geógrafo Beatriz de Aquino Ribeiro Lisboa - PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Bióloga Superviso Lílian Hangae - DIREP/ ICMBio - Geógrafa Luciana Costa Mota - Bióloga E uipe de Planejamento Antonio Lisboa - PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Msc. Geógrafo Beatriz de Aquino Ribeiro Lisboa - PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Bióloga Hudson Coimbra Felix - PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Gestor ambiental Renata Bocorny de Azevedo - PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Msc. Bióloga Thiago Orsi Laranjeiras - PN Viruá/ ICMBio - Msc. Biólogo Lílian Hangae - Supervisora - COMAN/ ICMBio - Geógrafa Ernesto Viveiros de Castro - CGEUP/ ICMBio - Msc. Biólogo Carlos Ernesto G. R. Schaefer - Consultor - PhD. Eng. Agrônomo Bruno Araújo Furtado de Mendonça - Colaborador/UFV - Dsc. Eng. Florestal Consultores e Colaboradores em reas Tem'ticas Hidrologia, Clima Carlos Ernesto G. R. Schaefer - PhD. Engenheiro Agrônomo (Consultor); Bruno Araújo Furtado de Mendonça - Dsc. Eng. Florestal (Colaborador UFV). Geologia, Geomorfologia Carlos Ernesto G. R. Schaefer - PhD. Engenheiro Agrônomo (Consultor); Bruno Araújo Furtado de Mendonça - Dsc.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Del “Grupo De Estudio Y Conservación De Orquídeas” Número 15 Enero – Febrero – Marzo 2012
    Revista del “Grupo de Estudio y Conservación de Orquídeas” Número 15 Enero – Febrero – Marzo 2012 Foto de portada: No he sido imparcial escogiendo esta imagen como portada. Me encanta el género Bulbophyllum, y (ISSN 1989-9688) es este híbrido Bulb. ‘Louis Sander’ me pareció sencillamente una publicación trimestral editada por el “Grupo de Estudio y fascinante. Daniel Jiménez ha capturado a la perfección esa Conservación de Orquídeas” extraña combinación de animal y planta que tanto caracteriza a (GECOR). Inscrita en el R.A. de la muchas de sus especies, donde surgen boca, dientes, lengua, Comunidad de Madrid, Sec. 1, nº 30.130. N.I.F. G85599421. pelos… Y no solo lo escojo para servir de portada, sino que estaré pendiente para incluirlo en mi orquidario en cuanto tenga oportunidad. Foto de contraportada: La delicada belleza de esta Trichoglotis pusilla podría animar a cualquiera a hacerse con una buena colección de vandáceas, una tribu con gran variedad de tamaños y formas, y especies para todos los gustos. La fotografía, así como la planta, son de Emilio Esteban-Infantes, quien ha descubierto el encanto de este tipo de orquídeas y, de paso, nos invita a hacernos con alguna de sus fascinantes miniaturas. SUMARIO 3 3 Editorial 4 4 Tema. Paphiopedilum Anitum. Una belleza en polémica (Anatolii Minzatu). 5 7 6 Tema. Mis experiencias en el cultivo in-vitro de orquídeas; 1ª parte (Isidro Palacios) 17 13 Sección. Humboldtiana. Benedict Roezl (Manuel Lucas) 19 21 17 Ficha de cultivo. Dendrobium spectabile (Manuel Lucas) 26 19 Sección. Cuando las orquídeas se hacen arte (José Fernández) 29 23 Ficha de cultivo.
    [Show full text]
  • CITES Orchids Appendix I Checklist
    CITES Appendix I Orchid Checklist For the genera: Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium And the species: Aerangis ellisii, Cattleya jongheana, Cattleya lobata, Dendrobium cruentum, Mexipedium xerophyticum, Peristeria elata and Renanthera imschootiana CITES Appendix I Orchid Checklist For the genera: Paphiopedilum and Phragmipedium And the species: Aerangis ellisii, Cattleya jongheana, Cattleya lobata, Dendrobium cruentum, Mexipedium xerophyticum, Peristeria elata and Renanthera imschootiana Second version Published July 2019 First version published December 2018 Compiled by: Rafa¨elGovaerts1, Aude Caromel2, Sonia Dhanda1, Frances Davis2, Alyson Pavitt2, Pablo Sinovas2 & Valentina Vaglica1 Assisted by a selected panel of orchid experts 1 Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew 2 United Nations Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC) Produced with the financial support of the CITES Secretariat and the European Commission Citation: Govaerts R., Caromel A., Dhanda S., Davis F., Pavitt A., Sinovas P., & Vaglica V. 2019. CITES Appendix I Orchid Checklist: Second Version. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, and UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge. The geographical designations employed in this book do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UN Environment, the CITES Secretariat, the European Commission, contributory organisations or editors, concerning the legal status of any country, territory or area, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Acknowledgements The compilers wish to thank colleagues at the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew (RBG Kew) and United Nations Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre (UNEP-WCMC). We appreciate the assistance of Heather Lindon and Dr. Helen Hartley for their work on the International Plants Names Index (IPNI), the backbone of the World Checklist of Selected Plant Families. We appreciate the guidance and advice of nomenclature specialist H.
    [Show full text]
  • Reaching a Compromise Between Conflicting Nuclear and Plastid
    Phytotaxa 186 (2): 075–086 ISSN 1179-3155 (print edition) www.mapress.com/phytotaxa/ PHYTOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 1179-3163 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.186.2.2 Reaching a compromise between conflicting nuclear and plastid phylogenetic trees: a new classification for the genus Cattleya (Epidendreae; Epidendroideae; Orchidaceae) CÁSSIO VAN DEN BERG Departamento de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Av. Transnordestina s.n., Feira de Santana, Bahia, 44036-900, Brazil; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract A new classification for the 114 species Cattleya is proposed, based on and compatible with previously published nuclear, plastid and combined phylogenetic trees. Cattleya is divided into four subgenera, three sections and five series. A key to the infrageneric categories and a table listing all species and their placement is presented. Key words: Laeliinae, Laelia, Sophronitis, infrageneric classification Introduction Cattleya Lindley (1824: t. 33) is a Neotropical genus with 114 species of outstanding horticultural importance (van den Berg 2005, 2008). On the basis of molecular phylogenetic results based on nuclear internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and plastid trnL-F (intron and intergenic spacer), matK and rbcL (van den Berg et al. 2000 , van den Berg 2009, van den Berg et al. 2009), Sophronitis Lindley (1828a: t. 1147) and all Brazilian species previously included in Laelia Lindley (1831a: 115) were transferred to Cattleya (van den Berg 2008). In the last paper, the rationale justifying lumping as a better option than splitting Cattleya in smaller genera was presented. The alternative option of splitting into several genera would the number of narrowly defined genera and create many thousand nothogenera in horticulture.
    [Show full text]
  • Efeitos Do Déficit Hídrico Na Fisiologia, Bioquímica E Morfologia De Protocormos Da Orquídea Epífita Laelia Lobata Lindl
    Versão corrigida 1 Valeria Paloma Ferrario Bazalar Efeitos do déficit hídrico na fisiologia, bioquímica e morfologia de protocormos da orquídea epífita Laelia lobata Lindl. Effects of water deficit on the physiology, biochemistry and morphology of the protocorms of the epiphytic orchid Laelia lobata Lindl. São Paulo 2019 Versão corrigida 2 Valeria Paloma Ferrario Bazalar Efeitos do déficit hídrico na fisiologia, bioquímica e morfologia de protocormos da orquídea epífita Laelia lobata Lindl. Effects of water deficit on the physiology, biochemistry and morphology of the protocorms of the epiphytic orchid Laelia lobata Lindl. Dissertação apresentada ao Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, para a obtenção de Título de Mestre em Ciências na Área da Botânica. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Gilberto Barbante Kerbauy São Paulo 3 2019 Ficha catalográfica elaborada pelo Serviço de Biblioteca do Instituto de Biociências da USP, com os dados fornecidos pelo autor no formulário: http://www.ib.usp.br/biblioteca/ficha-catalografica/ficha.php Ferrario Bazalar, Valeria Paloma Effects of water deficit on the physiology, biochemistry and morphology of the epiphytic orchid Laelia lobata (Lindl.) / Valeria Paloma Ferrario Bazalar; orientador Gilberto Barbante Kerbauy. -- São Paulo, 2019. 67 f. Dissertação (Mestrado) - Instituto de Biociências da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Botânica. 1. Water deficit. 2. Epiphytic orchid. 3. Tolerance mechanisms. 4. Laelia lobata. I. Barbante Kerbauy, Gilberto, orient. II. Título. Bibliotecária responsável pela estrutura da catalogação da publicação: Elisabete da Cruz Neves – CRB – 8/6228 Judging committee ______________ ______________ Prof. (a). Dr (a). Prof. (a). Dr (a). ______________ Prof. (a). Dr (a).Orientador 4 A todos aquellos que por temor a las críticas y a lo desconocido no se atreven a salir al mundo a luchar por un sueño por el que pocos apuestan.
    [Show full text]