February 12, 2020 the Honorable Michael Crapo Chairman, United
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Advisability and Feasibility of Developing USP Standards for Medical Cannabis Gabriel I
STIMULI TO THE REVISION PROCESS Stimuli articles do not necessarily reflect the policies of the USPC or the USP Council of Experts The Advisability and Feasibility of Developing USP Standards for Medical Cannabis Gabriel I. Giancaspro, Nam-Cheol Kim, Jaap Venema, Susan de Mars, Jennifer Devine, Carlos Celestino, Christine E. Feaster, Ben A. Firschein, Mary S. Waddell, Stephen M. Gardner, and Earl Jones Jr.a ABSTRACT This Stimuli article analyzes the need for public quality standards for medical cannabis (defined herein as marijuana used for medical purposes under state laws) and the potential role of the U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention (USP) in addressing that need.1 Following legalization of the medical use of cannabis in several U.S. states and internationally, USP has received requests to investigate the advisability and feasibility of developing quality standards for medical cannabis. Development of quality standards for medical cannabis requires consideration of a wide range of scientific, legal, and policy issues that reach far beyond its classification as a botanical drug or herbal medicine. This article discusses the current regulatory and scientific landscape regarding medical cannabis, identifies issues related to the lack of quality standards for medical cannabis, and explores potential options for developing quality standards. USP seeks input from stakeholders on whether USP should proceed with development of quality standards for medical cannabis and if so, what approaches should be utilized to establish such standards. LEGAL AND REGULATORY LANDSCAPE The federal and state regulatory environment surrounding the medical use of cannabis involves many federal agencies and various different state laws. The evolving legal environment is an important consideration when evaluating the advisability and feasibility of USP developing a public standard for cannabis. -
The Official High Times Cannabis Cookbook: More Than 50 Irresistible Recipes That Will Get You High
CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS INTRODUCTION TO CANNABIS COOKERY CHAPTER 1: Active Ingredients Basic Recipes THC Oil (Cannabis-Infused Oil) Cannacoconut Oil Cannabis-Infused Mayonnaise Simple Cannabutter Long-Simmering Cannabutter Wamm Marijuana Flour Tinctures Quick Cannabis Glycerite Long-Simmering Ganja Glycerin Green Avenger Cannabis Tincture CHAPTER 2: Irie Appetizers Roasted Ganja Garlic Cannellini Dip Hookah Lounge Hummus Green Leafy Kale Salad in Brown Cannabutter Vinaigrette Obama’S Sativa Samosas Stuffed Stoned JalapeñO Poppers Sativa Shrimp Spring Rolls with Mango Sauce Ganja Guacamole Mini Kind Veggie Burritos Pico de Ganja and Nachos Kind Bud Bruschetta with Pot Pesto Stoner Celebrity Favorite: Lil’ Snoop Hot Doggy Doggs CHAPTER 3: Munchie Meals Reggae Rice and Bean Soup Cream of Sinsemilla Soup Tom Yum Ganja Stoner Celebrity Favorite: Texas Cannabis Chili Shroomin’ Broccoli Casserole Om Circle Stuffed Butternut Squash Chicken and Andouille Ganja Gumbo Time-Warp Tamales Red, Green, and Gold Rasta Pasta Potato Gnocchi with Wild Mushroom Ragu Big Easy Eggplant Alfredo Ganja Granny’s Smoked Mac ‘n’ Cheese Psychedelic Spanakopita Sour Diesel Pot Pie Cheeto Fried Chicken Bacon-Wrapped Pork Tenderloin with Mango Chipotle Glaze Pot-and-Pancetta-Stuffed Beef Tenderloin with Port Mushrooms CHAPTER 4: High Holidays Valentine’s Day, February 14: Sexy Ganja–Dipped Strawberries St. Patrick’s Day, March 17: Green Ganja Garlic Smashed Potatoes 4/20, Cannabis Day, April 20: 420 Farmers’ Market Risotto Independence Day, July 4: Sweet and Tangy Bar–B–Cannabis -
A Baseline Review and Assessment of the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry: Market Data and Industry Participation
A Baseline Review and Assessment of the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry: Market Data and Industry Participation February 2020 Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission: Steven J. Hoffman, Chairman Kay Doyle, Commissioner Jennifer Flanagan, Commissioner Britte McBride, Commissioner Shaleen Title, Commissioner Shawn Collins, Executive Director Prepared by the Massachusetts Cannabis Control Commission Research and Information Technology Departments: Samantha M. Doonan, BA, Research Analyst David McKenna, PhD, Chief Technology Officer Julie K. Johnson, PhD, Director of Research Acknowledgements External Collaborators Alexandra F. Kritikos, MA, Brandeis University Cannabis Control Commission Communications Cedric Sinclair, Director of Communications Maryalice Gill, Press Secretary Kirsten Swenson, Communications Specialist Management Alisa Stack, Chief Operating Officer Erika Scibelli, Chief of Staff Legal Christine Baily, General Counsel Allie DeAngelis, Associate General Counsel Enforcement and Licensing Yaw Gyebi, Chief of Enforcement Paul Payer, Enforcement Counsel Kyle Potvin, Director of Licensing Patrick Beyea, Director of Investigations Derek Chamberlin, Licensing Analyst Anne DiMare, Licensing Specialist Government Affairs David Lakeman, Director of Government Affairs 2 Suggested bibliographic reference format: Doonan SM., McKenna, D., Johnson JK., (2020, February). A Baseline Review and Assessment of the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry— A Report to the Massachusetts Legislature. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Cannabis -
Medical Marijuana the War on Drugs and the Drug Policy Reform Movement
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA CRUZ FROM THE FRONTLINES TO THE BOTTOM LINE: MEDICAL MARIJUANA THE WAR ON DRUGS AND THE DRUG POLICY REFORM MOVEMENT A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction Of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in SOCIOLOGY by Thomas R. Heddleston June 2012 The Dissertation of Thomas R. Heddleston is approved: ____________________________________ Professor Craig Reinarman, Chair ____________________________________ Professor Andrew Szasz ____________________________________ Professor Barbara Epstein ___________________________________ Tyrus Miller Vice Provost and Dean of Graduate Studies Copyright © by Thomas R. Heddleston 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Chapter I: The History, Discourse, and Practice of Punitive Drug Prohibition 38 Chapter II: Three Branches Of Reform, The Drug Policy Reform Movement From 1964 To 2012 91 Chapter III: Sites of Social Movement Activity 149 Chapter IV: The Birth of Medical Marijuana In California 208 Chapter V: A Tale of 3 Cities Medical Marijuana 1997-2011 245 Chapter VI: From Movement to Industry 303 Conclusion 330 List of Supplementary Materials 339 References 340 iii LIST OF TABLES AND FIGURES Table 2.1: Major Organizations in the Drug Policy Reform Movement by Funding Source and Organizational Form 144 Table 3.1: Characteristics of Hemp Rallies Attended 158 Table 3.2: Drug Policy Organizations and the Internet 197 Figure 4.1: Proposition 215 Vote November 1996 241 Table 5.1: Political Opportunity Structures and Activist Tools 251 Table 5.2: Key Aspects of Political Opportunity Structures at 3 Levels of Government 263 Figure 5.1: Medical Cannabis Dispensaries by Region and State 283 iv ABSTRACT Thomas R. Heddleston From The Frontlines to the Bottom Line: Medical Marijuana the War On Drugs and the Drug Policy Reform Movement The medical marijuana movement began in the San Francisco Bay Area in the early 1990s in a climate of official repression. -
Amicus Brief
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA STATE OF ARIZONA, Arizona Supreme Court No. CR-18-0370-PR Appellee, Court of Appeals v. Division One No. 1 CA-CR 16-0703 RODNEY CHRISTOPHER JONES, Yavapai County Appellant. Superior Court No. P1300CR201400328 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF ARIZONA DISPENSARIES ASSOCIATION IN SUPPORT OF APPELLANT (Filed with consent of all parties) Eric M. Fraser (027241) OSBORN MALEDON, P.A. 2929 North Central Avenue, Ste. 2100 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 602-640-9000 [email protected] Attorneys for Amicus Curiae Arizona Dispensaries Association TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 5 INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ........................................................................ 5 REASONS TO GRANT REVIEW .......................................................................... 6 I. The Opinion warrants review because it will have an enormous impact across Arizona. .............................................................. 6 II. The Opinion upends the industry’s settled expectations. ...................... 7 III. Dispensaries manufacture concentrates using well-known, long-established processes that yield products that satisfy a wide range of patient requirements and preferences. ..........................11 A. Concentrates can be made using extremely simple processes. ...........................................................................................11 -
Kief USA, LLC D/B/A Hui
Kief USA, LLC d/b/a Hui, LLC Community Outreach Meeting Proposal for Marijuana Establishment at Presentation July 7, 2021 1 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA (fka 330 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA) LEADERSHIP Hui Zhang, President, Owner Tucker Cole, Master Grower - Women, Minority Entrepreneur - Over ten years of growing experience in the - First Generation Immigrant Entrepreneur horticulture industry - B.S. in Information Technology from - Over five years of experience in the Cannabis University of Wuhan and Master’s in Industry Financial Accounting from Renmin University - Experience in consulting, facility design, account of China management, research, and breeding of Cannabis Project Team - Managed ten thousand square feet greenhouses - Ali Lee, COO - Legal Advisors: Adam Braillard, Ashley Tan, and Ashfin Islam of Prince Lobel Tye LLP - CSI Engineering LLC, James R. O”Brien, LEED, AP BD+C - Keenan + Kenny Architects LTD, Antonia Kenny CANNABIS IN MASSACHUSETTS Massachusetts Industry Snapshot: ● 8,464 Applications, 794 Licenses ● Total gross sales: $1.47B ● 13,005 Agent Registrations PROPOSED FACILITY ● Marijuana Cultivation and Marijuana Product Manufacturing Establishment ● 1 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA (fka 330 Turner Street) ● Approximately ~84,000 SF on second floor ● Hours: 24/7 hours of cultivation ● 15-20 employees; commitment to use best efforts to hire locally and hire diversity ● At least 21 exclusive Parking Spaces for Hui LLC immediately next to the entrance of the Facility ● Product pickup from secure side loading dock ZONING/LOCATION 1 Turner Street, Attleboro, MA (fka 330 Turner Street) • Industrial Zoning District • Second floor of Existing ~84,000 SF building • 21 exclusive Parking Spaces for the proposed Facility (more available on site) • Building is not within 500 feet of any school (grades K-12), day care, public park, etc. -
Ethical Cannabis Lawyering in California Francis J
University of the Pacific Scholarly Commons McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship 2018 Ethical Cannabis Lawyering in California Francis J. Mootz III University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/facultyarticles Part of the Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons Recommended Citation Mootz, Francis J. III (2018) "Ethical Cannabis Lawyering in California," St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics: Vol. 9 : No. 1 , Article 1. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the McGeorge School of Law Faculty Scholarship at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in McGeorge School of Law Scholarly Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARTICLE Francis J. Mootz III Ethical Cannabis Lawyering in California Abstract. Cannabis has a long history in the United States. Originally, doctors and pharmacists used cannabis for a variety of purposes. After the Mexican Revolution led to widespread migration from Mexico to the United States, many Americans responded by associating this influx of foreigners with the use of cannabis, and thereby racializing and stigmatizing the drug. After the collapse of prohibition, the federal government repurposed its enormous enforcement bureaucracy to address the perceived problem of cannabis, despite the opposition of the American Medical Association to this new prohibition. Ultimately, both the states and the federal government classified cannabis as a dangerous drug with no therapeutic purpose, treating it the same as cocaine and heroin. Over the past few decades, a number of states have decriminalized cannabis and have permitted residents to purchase cannabis for medical conditions. -
Sample Tokyo Kief CAN+
170418-001 page 1 of 1 QA Testing PharmLabs San Diego Certificate of Analysis 3421 Hancock St, Second Floor, San Diego, CA 92110 | License: C8-0000098-LIC ISO/IEC 17025:2017 Certification L17-427-1 | Accreditation #85368 Sample Tokyo Kief Sample ID 170418-001 (21576) Matrix Concentrate (Inhalable Cannabis Good) Tested for MANKIND COOP Sampled - Received Apr 18, 2017 Reported May 16, 2017 Analyses executed CAN+ CAN+ - Cannabinoids Analysis Sample photography | Instrument HPLC-VWD | Method SOP-001 Measurement Uncertainty at 95% confidence 7.806% LOD LOQ Result Result Analyte mg/g mg/g % mg/g Cannabidivarin (CBDV) 0.002 0.16 NT NT Cannabidiolic Acid (CBDA) 0.001 0.16 NT NT Cannabigerol Acid (CBGA) 0.001 0.16 NT NT Cannabigerol (CBG) 0.001 0.16 NT NT Cannabidiol (CBD) 0.001 0.16 0.03 0.29 Tetrahydrocannabivarin (THCV) 0.001 0.16 NT NT Cannabinol (CBN) 0.001 0.16 0.34 3.39 Tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) 0.003 0.16 17.24 172.38 Δ8-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ8-THC) 0.004 0.16 NT NT Cannabicyclol (CBL) 0.002 0.006 NT NT Cannabichromene (CBC) 0.002 0.16 NT NT Tetrahydrocannabinolic Acid (THCA) 0.001 0.16 NT NT Total THC (THCa * 0.877 + THC) 17.24 172.38 Total CBD (CBDa * 0.877 + CBD) 0.03 0.29 TOTAL CANNABINOIDS 17.61 176.10 ND Not Detected Authorized Signature N/A Not Applicable NT Not Reported LOD Limit of Detection LOQ Limit of Quantification <LOQ Detected Jaclyn Mauser - Lab Director >ULOL Above upper limit of linearity CFU/g Colony Forming Units per 1 gram Tue, 16 May 2017 14:25:44 -0700 Accreditation #85368 Scan the QR code to TNTC Too Numerous to Count verify authenticity. -
Download the Patient's Guide To
PATIENT’S GUIDE TO CBD PATIENT'S GUIDE TO CBD AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS 2019 AmericansForSafeAccess.org 1 PATIENT'S GUIDE TO CBD AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD ...............................................................5 INTRODUCTION ...........................................................8 DEFINITIONS ..............................................................9 CANNABIS SATIVA L.. ......................................................11 AVAILABLE FORMS FOR USE .............................................13 INDICATED USES ..........................................................16 TALKING TO YOUR DOCTOR ABOUT CANNABINOIDS ....................18 FINDING THE RIGHT DOSE. .19 WHAT TO KNOW ABOUT PACKAGING, LABELING, AND HANDLING .....22 THE SUPPLY CHAIN ......................................................30 CHEMICAL STRUCTURE AND ACTIVITY ..................................34 UNDERSTANDING THE ENDOCANNABINOID SYSTEM ...................35 CANNABINOIDS, TERPENES, AND THE ENDOCANNABINOID SYSTEM ...38 FULL-SPECTRUM MEDICINE AND THE ENTOURAGE EFFECT ............38 CERTIFICATIONS AND THE NEED FOR STANDARDS .....................40 CURRENT RESEARCH .....................................................41 CBD ON A GLOBAL SCALE ...............................................42 CONCLUSION ............................................................44 REFERENCES ............................................................45 AMERICANS FOR SAFE ACCESS PATIENT’S GUIDE TO CBD That situation began to change in 1998, however, -
2018-2019 Coachella Valley Water District Operating Budget
Fiscal Year Coachella Valley 2018-19 Water District Operating & Capital Improvement Budget COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Operating & Capital Improvement Budget Fiscal Year 2018-19 John P. Powell, Jr., President, Division 3 Cástulo R. Estrada, Vice President, Division 5 G. Patrick O’Dowd, Director, Division 1 Anthony Bianco, Director, Division 2 Peter Nelson, Director, Division 4 Jim Barrett, General Manager Robert Cheng, Assistant General Manager P.O. Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 (760) 398-2651 www.cvwd.org The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) presented a Distinguished Budget Presentation Award to Coachella Valley Water District, California for its annual budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2017. In order to receive this award, a governmental unit must publish a budget document that meets program criteria as a policy document, as an operations guide, as a financial plan, and as a communication device This award is valid for a period of one year only. We believe our current budget continues to conform to the program requirements, as we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another award. CVWD Mission Statement To meet the water-related needs of the people, through dedicated employees, providing high quality water at a reasonable price. Board of Directors Standing from left: Peter Nelson, Division 4; John P. Powell, Jr., Board President, Division 3; G. Patrick O’Dowd, Division 1. Seated from left: Anthony Bianco, Division 2; Cástulo R. Estrada, Board Vice President, Division 5. Contact Information Acknowledgements This document is produced annually by the Finance and Thomas Rice, Financial Analyst Communications & Conservation departments. -
The Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission's Technical Authority
THE MARYLAND MEDICAL CANNABIS COMMISSION’S TECHNICAL AUTHORITY FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS TESTING REVISION 3.0 December 15, 2020 The Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission (MMCC) has developed this technical authority document to define contaminants and corresponding action limits associated with those contaminants in medical cannabis. This information is intended for use by the independent testing laboratories registered with the MMCC. Table of Contents Introduction 3 Sampling 4 Collection Procedure for Laboratory Samples 5 Potency 6 Pesticides 7 Residual Solvents 8 Microbiological Impurities 9 Heavy Metals 11 Excipients 13 Stability Testing 13 Appendix A - Medical Cannabis Testing Requirements 14 Appendix B - Definitions 15 Appendix C - Stability Testing Protocol- MMCC Licensed Grower 17 Appendix D - Stability Testing Protocol-MMCC Licensed Processor 19 Appendix E - Stability Testing Protocol-Edibles 21 Appendix F - Microbiological Quality Control 22 Appendix G- Pathogen Detection Storage Requirements 26 References 27 2 MMCC’s TECHNICAL AUTHORITY FOR MEDICAL CANNABIS TESTING 12/15/20 INTRODUCTION Analytical testing of medical cannabis for safety and potency is increasingly recognized as a critical and necessary component of the industry for several reasons (Freeman et al. 2016): ● Laboratory testing minimizes the risk of pesticides, microbes, heavy metals, toxins, and residual solvents from being consumed by an immunocompromised population; ● Quantification of cannabinoid profiles and potency becomes available for the consumer and aids in determining appropriate dosing for individual use; and ● Laboratory testing provides a sense of public safety and product quality for the medical cannabis tested. The Maryland Medical Cannabis Commission (MMCC), with the assistance of a scientific work group, has established this technical authority to serve as a reference guide for the independent testing laboratories (ITL) to follow when analyzing medical cannabis. -
West Coast Leaf
The Cannabis FREE Newspaper of Record www.WestCoastLeaf.com ISSN 1945-221X • Volume 4 No. 1 Spring 2011 New Directions Big jump in cannabis legislation nationally State lawmakers nationwide Hawaii, Illinois, Rhode Island, Texas, and Virginia) are considering bills to ‘decrimi- weigh marijuana reform nalize’ possession of small amounts of By Morgan Fox, Marijuana Policy Project marijuana, and at least one more state leg- One of the biggest victories for cannabis islature is expected to consider a similar last year was the sheer quantity of publici- proposal during the 2011 legislative ses- ty in the media. After the discussion sur- sion. All the bills would replace possible rounding Props 19 in California, 203 in jail sentences with fines for a modest Arizona, and other major devel opments amount of marijuana (ranging from less around the country, reform is in the lime- than an ounce to up to two ounces). light. More importantly, it is finally being While many argue that marijuana treated as a legitimate policy issue. decrim does not go far enough, it would be This exposure has had an impact in a a tremendous step forward for states like number of state legislatures this session. Texas with Draconian penalties, where More states are considering cannabis more wide-reaching reform is still years Kristin Peskuski addressed a Medical Cannabis Conference held at the senior community reform measures now than ever, and there off. Any step to help keep marijuana users Laguna Woods City Auditorium on Jan. 22. The image behind her depicts super-magnified and is a real possibility that we will see some out of jail deserves support.