DOCSLIB.ORG

ORNL TM-2007 44.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ORNL TM-2007 44.Pdf ORNL/TM-2007/44 Leadership Computing Facility National Center for Computational Sciences Oak Ridge National Laboratory COMPUTATIONAL SCIENCE REQUIREMENTS FOR LEADERSHIP COMPUTING Douglas Kothe Ricky Kendall Date Published: July 2007 Prepared by OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY P.O. Box 2008 Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6254 managed by UT-Battelle, LLC for the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY under contract DE-AC05-00OR22725 Computational Science Requirements Contents CONTENTS FIGURES .................................................................................................................................................. v TABLES ................................................................................................................................................... vii ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................................. ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................................... xiii INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 SCIENCE DRIVERS ......................................................................................................................... 3 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................... 5 SCIENCE QUALITY AND PRODUCTIVITY REQUIREMENTS ....................................................... 7 MODEL AND ALGORITHM REQUIREMENTS ........................................................................... 9 SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................................. 13 RUNTIME REQUIREMENTS................................................................................................................. 17 DATA ANALYSIS AND DATA MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS ............................................... 21 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................... 27 SCIENCE ........................................................................................................................................... 27 MODELS AND ALGORITHMS ....................................................................................................... 27 SOFTWARE ...................................................................................................................................... 28 RUNTIME FOOTPRINT ................................................................................................................... 29 DATA ANALYSIS AND DATA MANAGEMENT ......................................................................... 29 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................................................................................................ 31 APPENDIX A: GLOSSARY OF APPLICATION CODES .................................................................... 37 APPENDIX B: PROJECT ALLOCATIONS AND USAGE ON THE NCCS LCF SYSTEMS IN 2006 ............................................................................................................................ 43 APPENDIX C: APPLICATIONS REQUIREMENT COUNCIL ............................................................ 51 APPENDIX D: ASCAC CODE PROJECT QUESTIONNAIRE ............................................................. 61 APPENDIX E: SURVEY OF ACCEPTANCE AND EARLY ACCESS SCIENCE APPLICATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 67 iii Computational Science Requirements Figures FIGURES B.1. Job size distribution of allocated science applications on the NCCS LCF systems in the January to September 2006 time period ............................................................................. 45 B.2. Percentage of total NCCS LCF system utilization for each project receiving a 2006 allocation award in the January to September 2006 time period ........................................ 46 B.3. Month-by-month change in the job size distribution of the allocated science applications on the NCCS Cray XT3 (Jaguar) system in the January to September 2006 time period. ....................................................................................................... 46 B.4. Month-by-month change in the job size distribution of the allocated science applications on the NCCS Cray X1E (Phoenix) system in the January to September 2006 time period ........................................................................................................ 47 B.5. FY 06 utilization on the Cray XT3 (Jaguar) system by scientific discipline. .............................. 47 B.6. FY 06 utilization on the Cray X1E (Phoenix) system by scientific discipline. ........................... 48 E.1. AORSA on the Cray XT series Jaguar system compared with an IBM Power3 ......................... 69 E.2. Performance of the CAM 3.1 atmospheric model. ...................................................................... 71 E.3. Explicit Eulerian hydrodynamics. VH-1 weak scaling. ............................................................... 76 E.4. FLASH exhibited good scaling. ................................................................................................... 78 E.5. Good scaling was achieved on up to 5000 processors ................................................................. 80 E.6. GYRO scaling studies on various computers. ............................................................................. 84 E.7. LAMMPS parallelize efficiently for large problems. .................................................................. 87 E.8. MADNESS shows good overall scaling and scalability of the component algorithms. .............. 91 E.9. The codes for the Cray XTE will be optimized ........................................................................... 97 E.10. Single fuel assembly of a sodium-cooled, fast-spectrum nuclear reactor. ................................... 101 E.11. Benchmarks of the DFT code on various architectures. .............................................................. 106 E.12. PFLOTRAN has exhibited linear (strong) scaling on up to 2048 processors on Jaguar and good (though nonlinear) scaling to 4096 processors ............................................................. 110 E.13. Parallel Ocean Program (POP) 1.4.3: 0.1-degree benchmark, logarithmic axes. ........................ 113 v National Center for Computational Sciences E.14. Parallel Ocean Program (POP) 1.4.3: 0.1-degree benchmark, linear axes................................... 113 E.15. Strong scaling Qbox results on BlueGene/L for 1000 molybdenum atoms with 1 (non-zero) k-point ............................................................................................................. 116 E.16. S3D scaling demonstrated with a weak-scaling test. ................................................................... 121 vi Computational Science Requirements Tables TABLES 1. Science drivers projects receiving a 2006 allocation on LCF systems at the NCCS .................. 3 2. Science investigations and achievements possible on a 1-PF LC system for specific application codes in relevant science domains ............................................................................ 7 3. Increase in science simulation fidelity possible with a 1-PF LC system for specific application codes in various science domains .............................................................................. 8 4. Examples of how physical model attributes might change on a 1-PF LC system for specific application codes in various science domains ................................................................ 10 5. The “seven dwarfs” categorization of algorithms employed by specific application codes in various science domains ................................................................................................ 11 6. Functional software requirements (and options) for specific application codes in various science domains .......................................................................................................... 13 7. Typical features and associated suggested requirements for components of an LC system software stack .................................................................................................................. 14 8. Proposed solutions to specific requirements for components of the NCCS LCF software stack .............................................................................................................................. 15 9. Science application behavioral and algorithmic drivers for LC system attributes ...................... 18 10. Three-tier prioritization of 12 system attributes for relevant science domains ........................... 19 11. Typical development characteristics and runtime requirements of a single simulation (job) for selected application codes on the NCCS LCF systems circa June 2006 ...................... 20 12. Typical per-simulation I/O requirements for the largest data-producing application codes on the NCCS LCF systems ................................................................................................ 21 13. Prescription for estimating local storage bandwidth requirements for science applications on LC systems ........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Free and Open Source Software for Computational Chemistry Education
    Free and Open Source Software for Computational Chemistry Education Susi Lehtola∗,y and Antti J. Karttunenz yMolecular Sciences Software Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, United States zDepartment of Chemistry and Materials Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland E-mail: [email protected].fi Abstract Long in the making, computational chemistry for the masses [J. Chem. Educ. 1996, 73, 104] is finally here. We point out the existence of a variety of free and open source software (FOSS) packages for computational chemistry that offer a wide range of functionality all the way from approximate semiempirical calculations with tight- binding density functional theory to sophisticated ab initio wave function methods such as coupled-cluster theory, both for molecular and for solid-state systems. By their very definition, FOSS packages allow usage for whatever purpose by anyone, meaning they can also be used in industrial applications without limitation. Also, FOSS software has no limitations to redistribution in source or binary form, allowing their easy distribution and installation by third parties. Many FOSS scientific software packages are available as part of popular Linux distributions, and other package managers such as pip and conda. Combined with the remarkable increase in the power of personal devices—which rival that of the fastest supercomputers in the world of the 1990s—a decentralized model for teaching computational chemistry is now possible, enabling students to perform reasonable modeling on their own computing devices, in the bring your own device 1 (BYOD) scheme. In addition to the programs’ use for various applications, open access to the programs’ source code also enables comprehensive teaching strategies, as actual algorithms’ implementations can be used in teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • Quan Wan, "First Principles Simulations of Vibrational Spectra
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO FIRST PRINCIPLES SIMULATIONS OF VIBRATIONAL SPECTRA OF AQUEOUS SYSTEMS A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE INSTITUTE FOR MOLECULAR ENGINEERING IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BY QUAN WAN CHICAGO, ILLINOIS AUGUST 2015 Copyright c 2015 by Quan Wan All Rights Reserved For Jing TABLE OF CONTENTS LISTOFFIGURES .................................... vii LISTOFTABLES ..................................... xii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................. xiii ABSTRACT ........................................ xiv 1 INTRODUCTION ................................... 1 2 FIRST PRINCIPLES CALCULATIONS OF GROUND STATE PROPERTIES . 5 2.1 Densityfunctionaltheory. 5 2.1.1 TheSchr¨odingerEquation . 5 2.1.2 Density Functional Theory and the Kohn-Sham Ansatz . .. 6 2.1.3 Approximations to the Exchange-Correlation Energy Functional... 9 2.1.4 Planewave Pseudopotential Scheme . 11 2.1.5 First Principles Molecular Dynamics . 12 3 FIRST-PRINCIPLES CALCULATIONS IN THE PRESENCE OF EXTERNAL ELEC- TRICFIELDS ..................................... 14 3.1 Density functional perturbation theory for Homogeneous Electric Field Per- turbations..................................... 14 3.1.1 LinearResponsewithinDFPT. 14 3.1.2 Homogeneous Electric Field Perturbations . 15 3.1.3 ImplementationofDFPTintheQboxCode . 17 3.2 Finite Field Methods for Homogeneous Electric Field . 20 3.2.1 Finite Field Methods . 21 3.2.2 Computational Details of Finite Field Implementations . 25 3.2.3 Results for Single Water Molecules and Liquid Water . 27 3.2.4 Conclusions ................................ 32 4 VIBRATIONAL SIGNATURES OF CHARGE FLUCTUATIONS IN THE HYDRO- GENBONDNETWORKOFLIQUIDWATER . 34 4.1 IntroductiontoVibrationalSpectroscopy . ..... 34 4.1.1 NormalModeandTCFApproaches. 35 4.1.2 InfraredSpectroscopy. .. .. 36 4.1.3 RamanSpectroscopy ........................... 37 4.2 RamanSpectroscopyforLiquidWater . 39 4.3 TheoreticalMethods ............................... 41 4.3.1 Simulation Details . 41 4.3.2 Effective molecular polarizabilities .
    [Show full text]
  • Living at the Top of the Top500: Myopia from Being at the Bleeding Edge
    Living at the Top of the Top500: Myopia from Being at the Bleeding Edge Bronson Messer Oak Ridge Leadership Computing Facility & Theoretical Astrophysics Group Oak Ridge National Laboratory Department of Physics & Astronomy University of Tennessee Friday, July 1, 2011 Outline • Statements made without proof • OLCF’s Center for Accelerated Application Readiness • Speculations on task-based approaches for multiphysics applications in astrophysics (e.g. blowing up stars) 2 Friday, July 1, 2011 Riffing on Hank’s fable... 3 Friday, July 1, 2011 The Effects of Moore’s Law and Slacking 1 on Large Computations Chris Gottbrath, Jeremy Bailin, Casey Meakin, Todd Thompson, J.J. Charfman Steward Observatory, University of Arizona Abstract We show that, in the context of Moore’s Law, overall productivity can be increased for large enough computations by ‘slacking’orwaiting for some period of time before purchasing a computer and beginning the calculation. According to Moore’s Law, the computational power availableataparticular price doubles every 18 months. Therefore it is conceivable that for sufficiently large numerical calculations and fixed budgets, computing power will improve quickly enough that the calculation will finish faster if we wait until the available computing power is sufficiently better and start the calculation then. The Effects of Moore’s Law and Slacking 1Figureon Large 1: Computations Chris Gottbrath, Jeremy Bailin, Casey Meakin, Todd Thompson, J.J. Charfman 1 The Effects of Moore’sSteward Observatory, Law and University Slacking of Arizona on Large astro-ph/9912202 Computations Abstract Chris Gottbrath, Jeremy Bailin, Casey Meakin, Todd Thompson, We show that, in the context of Moore’s Law, overall productivity can be increased forJ.J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Impact of Density Functional Theory on Materials Research
    www.mrs.org/bulletin functional. This functional (i.e., a function whose argument is another function) de- scribes the complex kinetic and energetic interactions of an electron with other elec- Toward Computational trons. Although the form of this functional that would make the reformulation of the many-body Schrödinger equation exact is Materials Design: unknown, approximate functionals have proven highly successful in describing many material properties. Efficient algorithms devised for solving The Impact of the Kohn–Sham equations have been imple- mented in increasingly sophisticated codes, tremendously boosting the application of DFT methods. New doors are opening to in- Density Functional novative research on materials across phys- ics, chemistry, materials science, surface science, and nanotechnology, and extend- ing even to earth sciences and molecular Theory on Materials biology. The impact of this fascinating de- velopment has not been restricted to aca- demia, as DFT techniques also find application in many different areas of in- Research dustrial research. The development is so fast that many current applications could Jürgen Hafner, Christopher Wolverton, and not have been realized three years ago and were hardly dreamed of five years ago. Gerbrand Ceder, Guest Editors The articles collected in this issue of MRS Bulletin present a few of these suc- cess stories. However, even if the compu- Abstract tational tools necessary for performing The development of modern materials science has led to a growing need to complex quantum-mechanical calcula- tions relevant to real materials problems understand the phenomena determining the properties of materials and processes on are now readily available, designing a an atomistic level.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice: Quantum ESPRESSO I
    MODULE 2: QUANTUM MECHANICS Practice: Quantum ESPRESSO I. What is Quantum ESPRESSO? 2 DFT software PW-DFT, PP, US-PP, PAW FREE http://www.quantum-espresso.org PW-DFT, PP, PAW FREE http://www.abinit.org DFT PW, PP, Car-Parrinello FREE http://www.cpmd.org DFT PP, US-PP, PAW $3000 [moderate accuracy, fast] http://www.vasp.at DFT full-potential linearized augmented $500 plane-wave (FLAPW) [accurate, slow] http://www.wien2k.at Hartree-Fock, higher order correlated $3000 electron approaches http://www.gaussian.com 3 Quantum ESPRESSO 4 Quantum ESPRESSO Quantum ESPRESSO is an integrated suite of Open- Source computer codes for electronic-structure calculations and materials modeling at the nanoscale. It is based on density-functional theory, plane waves, and pseudopotentials. Core set of codes, plugins for more advanced tasks and third party packages Open initiative coordinated by the Quantum ESPRESSO Foundation, across Italy. Contributed to by developers across the world Regular hands-on workshops in Trieste, Italy Open-source code: FREE (unlike VASP...) 5 Performance Small jobs (a few atoms) can be run on single node Includes determining convergence parameters, lattice constants Can use OpenMP parallelization on multicore machines Large jobs (~10’s to ~100’s atoms) can run in parallel using MPI to 1000’s of cores Includes molecular dynamics, large geometry relaxation, phonons Parallel performance tied to BLAS/LAPACK (linear algebra routines) and 3D FFT (fast Fourier transform) New GPU-enabled version available 6 Usability Documented online:
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    PART I METHODS COPYRIGHTED MATERIAL CHAPTER 1 Overview of Thermochemistry and Its Application to Reaction Kinetics ELKE GOOS Institute of Combustion Technology, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Stuttgart, Germany ALEXANDER BURCAT Faculty of Aerospace Engineering, Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel 1.1 HISTORY OF THERMOCHEMISTRY Thermochemistry deals with energy and enthalpy changes accompanying chemical reactions and phase transformations and gives a first estimate of whether a given reaction can occur. To our knowledge, the field of thermochemistry started with the experiments done by Malhard and Le Chatelier [1] with gunpowder and explosives. The first of their two papers of 1883 starts with the sentence: “All combustion is accompanied by the release of heat that increases the temperature of the burned bodies.” In 1897, Berthelot [2], who also experimented with explosives, published his two-volume monograph Thermochimie in which he summed up 40 years of calori- metric studies. The first textbook, to our knowledge, that clearly explained the principles of thermochemical properties was authored by Lewis and Randall [3] in 1923. Thermochemical data, actually heats of formation, were gathered, evaluated, and published for the first time in the seven-volume book International Critical Tables of Numerical Data, Physics, Chemistry and Technology [4] during 1926–1930 (and the additional index in 1933). In 1932, the American Chemical Society (ACS) monograph No. 60 The Free Energy of Some Organic Compounds [5] appeared. Rate Constant Calculation for Thermal Reactions: Methods and Applications, Edited by Herbert DaCosta and Maohong Fan. Ó 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Published 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 3 4 OVERVIEW OF THERMOCHEMISTRY AND ITS APPLICATION TO REACTION KINETICS In 1936 was published The Thermochemistry of the Chemical Substances [6] where the authors Bichowsky and Rossini attempted to standardize the available data and published them at a common temperature of 18C (291K) and pressure of 1 atm.
    [Show full text]
  • The CECAM Electronic Structure Library and the Modular Software Development Paradigm
    The CECAM electronic structure library and the modular software development paradigm Cite as: J. Chem. Phys. 153, 024117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0012901 Submitted: 06 May 2020 . Accepted: 08 June 2020 . Published Online: 13 July 2020 Micael J. T. Oliveira , Nick Papior , Yann Pouillon , Volker Blum , Emilio Artacho , Damien Caliste , Fabiano Corsetti , Stefano de Gironcoli , Alin M. Elena , Alberto García , Víctor M. García-Suárez , Luigi Genovese , William P. Huhn , Georg Huhs , Sebastian Kokott , Emine Küçükbenli , Ask H. Larsen , Alfio Lazzaro , Irina V. Lebedeva , Yingzhou Li , David López- Durán , Pablo López-Tarifa , Martin Lüders , Miguel A. L. Marques , Jan Minar , Stephan Mohr , Arash A. Mostofi , Alan O’Cais , Mike C. Payne, Thomas Ruh, Daniel G. A. Smith , José M. Soler , David A. Strubbe , Nicolas Tancogne-Dejean , Dominic Tildesley, Marc Torrent , and Victor Wen-zhe Yu COLLECTIONS Paper published as part of the special topic on Electronic Structure Software Note: This article is part of the JCP Special Topic on Electronic Structure Software. This paper was selected as Featured ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN Recent developments in the PySCF program package The Journal of Chemical Physics 153, 024109 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0006074 An open-source coding paradigm for electronic structure calculations Scilight 2020, 291101 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/10.0001593 Siesta: Recent developments and applications The Journal of Chemical Physics 152, 204108 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0005077 J. Chem. Phys. 153, 024117 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0012901 153, 024117 © 2020 Author(s). The Journal ARTICLE of Chemical Physics scitation.org/journal/jcp The CECAM electronic structure library and the modular software development paradigm Cite as: J.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix a a List of the Program and Data Files on the Disk*
    Appendix A A List of the Program and Data Files on the Disk* 2dnrnr Simulates a IH COSY two-dimensional NMR plot (5.5). Abc Calculates principal moments of inertia for linear and non­ linear molecules (4.5). Acetate Calculates the pH in an acetate buffer (3.2). Anderko Solves the Anderko-Pitzer nonideal gas law (1.2). Aorbital Calculates and plots H atomic orbitals in two dimensions (4.3). Atpl Calculates and plots the apparent standard Gibbs energy I:irGo 1 for the ATP hydrolysis reaction at various pMg's and a specified pH and ionic strength (3.3). Atp2 Calculates and plots the apparent standard Gibbs energy I:irGo 1 for the ATP hydrolysis reaction at various pH's and a specified pMg and ionic strength (3.3). Beattie Solves the Beattie-Bridgeman nonideal gas law (1.2). Beyer Calculates and plots the density of states N(E) and the sum of states G(E) for a molecule's vibrational modes using the Beyer-Swinehart direct-count algorithm (11.4). Biochern Calculates and plots the apparent standard Gibbs energy I:irGo 1 for the F -+ M biochemical reaction at various pH's (3.3). Biokin Calculates and plots extracellular glucose and insulin con­ centrations as functions of time (10.4). Branch Calculates and plots H, 0, OH and 02 concentrations for the branching catalytic cycle that drives the 2H2 + 02 -+ 2H20 reaction (10.2). Brussels Calculates and plots concentrations of intermediates in the autocatalytic Brusselator model (11.5). Butler Calculates and plots the Butler-Volmer and Tafel equations relating electrode current and overpotential (11.6).
    [Show full text]
  • A Deep Dive Into ASUS Solutions
    From DataCenters to Supercomputers A Deep Dive Into ASUS Solutions Christopher Liang / Server/WS Product manager ASUS is a global technology leader in the Who is ASUS? digital era. We focus on the mastery of technological innovation and design perfection. We’re very critical of our own work when it comes to only delivering consumers our very best. ASUS Worldwide ASUS has a strong presence in over 50 countries, with offices in Europe, Asia, Australia and New Zealand, the Americas, and South Africa. • > 11,000 employees worldwide (source : HR dept ) • > 3,100 R&D employees (source : HR dept ) • 900+ support centers worldwide (source : TSD dept ) Business Update 11 (estimated) ASUS closed 2011 on a high, with revenues around US$11.8 billion. As of September 2010, the brand is estimated to be worth US$1.285 billion*. 10.1 *2010 Top Taiwan Global Brand (Interbrand) ** Due to Q1-Q2 worldwide economy crisis 8.21 7.66** 6.99 5.087 3.783 3.010 2.081 Revenue US$ (billions) Leader in Performance and Reliability #1 Motherboard Since 1989, ASUS has shipped over 420 million motherboards. Placed end to end, they can form a chain long enough to circumnavigate the globe more than three times. #1 Windows-based Desktop PC Reliability Ranked most reliable Window’s based PC brand 2 years in a row by PCWorld. The 2011 PCWorld Reliability and Service survey was conducted with 63,000 PCWorld readers. 1. Though design thinking to provide cutting Why ASUS ? edge SPEC 2. BIOS – superior performance through increased functionality and upgradeability 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Kepler Gpus and NVIDIA's Life and Material Science
    LIFE AND MATERIAL SCIENCES Mark Berger; [email protected] Founded 1993 Invented GPU 1999 – Computer Graphics Visual Computing, Supercomputing, Cloud & Mobile Computing NVIDIA - Core Technologies and Brands GPU Mobile Cloud ® ® GeForce Tegra GRID Quadro® , Tesla® Accelerated Computing Multi-core plus Many-cores GPU Accelerator CPU Optimized for Many Optimized for Parallel Tasks Serial Tasks 3-10X+ Comp Thruput 7X Memory Bandwidth 5x Energy Efficiency How GPU Acceleration Works Application Code Compute-Intensive Functions Rest of Sequential 5% of Code CPU Code GPU CPU + GPUs : Two Year Heart Beat 32 Volta Stacked DRAM 16 Maxwell Unified Virtual Memory 8 Kepler Dynamic Parallelism 4 Fermi 2 FP64 DP GFLOPS GFLOPS per DP Watt 1 Tesla 0.5 CUDA 2008 2010 2012 2014 Kepler Features Make GPU Coding Easier Hyper-Q Dynamic Parallelism Speedup Legacy MPI Apps Less Back-Forth, Simpler Code FERMI 1 Work Queue CPU Fermi GPU CPU Kepler GPU KEPLER 32 Concurrent Work Queues Developer Momentum Continues to Grow 100M 430M CUDA –Capable GPUs CUDA-Capable GPUs 150K 1.6M CUDA Downloads CUDA Downloads 1 50 Supercomputer Supercomputers 60 640 University Courses University Courses 4,000 37,000 Academic Papers Academic Papers 2008 2013 Explosive Growth of GPU Accelerated Apps # of Apps Top Scientific Apps 200 61% Increase Molecular AMBER LAMMPS CHARMM NAMD Dynamics GROMACS DL_POLY 150 Quantum QMCPACK Gaussian 40% Increase Quantum Espresso NWChem Chemistry GAMESS-US VASP CAM-SE 100 Climate & COSMO NIM GEOS-5 Weather WRF Chroma GTS 50 Physics Denovo ENZO GTC MILC ANSYS Mechanical ANSYS Fluent 0 CAE MSC Nastran OpenFOAM 2010 2011 2012 SIMULIA Abaqus LS-DYNA Accelerated, In Development NVIDIA GPU Life Science Focus Molecular Dynamics: All codes are available AMBER, CHARMM, DESMOND, DL_POLY, GROMACS, LAMMPS, NAMD Great multi-GPU performance GPU codes: ACEMD, HOOMD-Blue Focus: scaling to large numbers of GPUs Quantum Chemistry: key codes ported or optimizing Active GPU acceleration projects: VASP, NWChem, Gaussian, GAMESS, ABINIT, Quantum Espresso, BigDFT, CP2K, GPAW, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. David Danovich
    Dr. David Danovich ! 14 January 2021 (h-index: 34; 124 publications) Personal Information Name: Contact information Danovich David Private: Nissan Harpaz st., 4/9, Jerusalem, Date of Birth: 9371643 Israel June 29, 1959 Mobile: +972-54-4768669 E-mail: [email protected] Place of Birth: Irkutsk, USSR Work: Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew Citizenship: University, Edmond Safra Campus, Israeli Givat Ram, 9190401 Jerusalem, Israel Marital status: Phone: +972-2-6586934 Married +2 FAX: +972-2-6584033 E-mail: [email protected] Current position 1992- present: Senior computational chemist and scientific programmer in the Institute of Chemistry, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel Scientific skills Very experienced scientific researcher with demonstrated ability to implement ab initio molecular electronic structure and valence bond calculations for obtaining insights into physical and chemical properties of molecules and materials. Extensive expertise in implementation of Molecular Orbital Theory based on ab initio methods such as Hartree-Fock theory (HF), Density Functional Theory (DFT), Moller-Plesset Perturbation theory (MP2-MP5), Couple Cluster theories [CCST(T)], Complete Active Space (CAS, CASPT2) theories, Multireference Configuration Interaction (MRCI) theory and modern ab initio valence bond theory (VBT) methods such as Valence Bond Self Consistent Field theory (VBSCF), Breathing Orbital Valence Bond theory (BOVB) and its variants (like D-BOVB, S-BOVB and SD-BOVB), Valence Bond Configuration Interaction theory (VBCI), Valence Bond Perturbation theory (VBPT). Language skills Advanced Conversational English, Russian Hebrew Academic background 1. Undergraduate studies, 1978-1982 Master of Science in Physics, June 1982 Irkutsk State University, USSR Dr. David Danovich ! 2. Graduate studies, 1984-1989 Ph.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview on the Libxc Library of Density Functional Approximations
    An overview on the Libxc library of density functional approximations Susi Lehtola Molecular Sciences Software Institute at Virginia Tech 2 June 2021 Outline Why Libxc? Recap on DFT What is Libxc? Using Libxc A look under the hood Wrapup GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 2/28 Why Libxc? There are many approximations for the exchange-correlation functional. But, most programs I ... only implement a handful (sometimes 5, typically 10-15) I ... and the implementations may be buggy / non-standard GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 3/28 Why Libxc, cont'd This leads to issues with reproducibility I chemists and physicists do not traditionally use the same functionals! Outdated(?) stereotype: B3LYP vs PBE I how to reproduce a calculation performed with another code? GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 4/28 Why Libxc, cont'd The issue is compounded by the need for backwards and forwards compatibility: how can one I reproduce old calculations from the literature done with a now-obsolete functional (possibly with a program that is proprietary / no longer available)? I use a newly developed functional in an old program? GPAW 2021: Users' and Developers' Meeting Susi Lehtola Why Libxc? 5/28 Why Libxc, cont'd A standard implementation is beneficial! I no need to keep reinventing (and rebuilding) the wheel I use same collection of density functionals in all programs I new functionals only need to be implemented in one place I broken/buggy functionals only need to be fixed in one place I same implementation can be used across numerical approaches, e.g.
    [Show full text]