Snohomish County Public Works

Dave Somers 3000 Rockefeller Avenue M/S #604 County Executive Everett, WA 98201-4046

MEMORANDUM

TO: Snohomish County Planning Commission Ikuno Masterson, Acting Planning Commission Secretary

FROM: Aaron Lee, Transportation Senior Planner Jay Larson, AICP, Transportation Planning Coordinator

DATE: April 10, 2017

SUBJECT: Briefing - GPP3 Transportation Element Amendments

Introduction

Snohomish County Public Works is providing this staff report to the Snohomish County Planning Commission for an April 25th, 2017, briefing on the proposed 2017 county-initiated GPP3 amendments to the Transportation Element (TE) of the Snohomish County Growth Management Act Comprehensive Plan (GMACP). This proposal was placed on a list of county-initiated comprehensive plan amendments by Amended Motion No. 16-316 and identified as GPP3 – Amendments to tables, text and maps to reflect the passage of ’s ST3 initiative and to reflect changes in ’s updated transit development plan

The proposed amendments would add and or amend the High Capacity Transit Map, and related text and charts in the TE as a result of the passage of Sound Transit 3 (ST3) initiative in November 2016. The proposed amendments would update the TE to reflect new planned projects and capital facilities for both Sound Transit (ST) and Community Transit (CT).

This staff report provides the background and rationale for the proposed TE amendments (including the text of the proposed amendments). The proposed TE amendments are included in Attachment 1.

2017 County-Initiated Comprehensive Plan Amendment Process

Under the Growth Management Act (GMA), amendments to the county’s comprehensive plan can be considered and adopted no more than once per year with limited exceptions. County-initiated amendments to the comprehensive plan and implementing development regulations are processed annually pursuant to the requirements of chapter 30.73 Snohomish County Code (SCC).

At a public hearing on May 23, 2017, the Planning Commission will be asked to make a recommendation on the proposed GPP3 Transportation Element amendments, which will be packaged with other recommended 2017 county-initiated comprehensive plan proposals and transmitted to the Snohomish County Council for review and final action later this year.

1 Background

GMA includes the following goal in RCW 36.70A.020 (3):

Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.

Pursuant to this goal, transportation policies and the identification of needed transportation facilities are contained in PSRC’s Transportation 2040, the Multicounty Planning Policies (MPPs) contained in Vision 2040, the Countywide Planning Policies (CPPs), the transportation and related policies in the Snohomish County General Policy Plan (GPP) and in the existing TE. No inconsistencies have been identified between the county’s existing transportation policies in the GPP and the TE compared to GMA, the MPPs, or the CPPs. The TE amendments proposed in GPP3 will support continued consistency with GMA goals, the MPPs, the CPPs, and county policies.

The TE includes a section on Supportive Public Transportation Improvements. In this section is included a description of major planned transit improvements and a High Capacity Transit Map. The High Capacity Transit Map shows the planned high capacity transit network in Snohomish County including , Sound Transit , and Community Transit’s (CT) planned (BRT) system. Because the Sound Transit 3 proposal had not yet been developed, three possible alignments were shown on the map for light rail from Lynnwood to Everett. With the passage of Sound Transit 3 by voters in 2016, there have been many changes to ST’s long term planned transit projects and capital facilities. Since 2015, more specific plans for CT’s Swift system were released in the 2016-2021 Transit Development Plan. The proposed GPP3 Transportation Element amendments have been developed to update the TE with these significant changes to regional and local transit plans.

GPP3 Proposal

The GPP3 proposal includes text changes to chapter IV, sections E1a, E1c, E2a, Table 16, and Figure 8. The proposed E1a changes reflects updated changes to Community Transit’s 2016-2021 transit development plan. The proposed E1c changes reflect the recent passage of the ST3 initiative. The proposed E2a changes reflect updates to Capital Facility near-term projects in Snohomish County. The proposed Table 16 changes now reflect an updated list of High Capacity Transit improvements in Snohomish County. The proposed changes to Figure 8 – High Capacity Transit Map reflects the approved route alignment of light rail to Everett, BRT service on I-405, and bus stops along Community Transit’s SWIFT BRT Green Line.

Proposed Amendment Reason for Amendment Update Supportive Public Transportation Reflects both Community Transit’s and Sound Improvements Section in the TE for Transit most current long-range plans Community Transit long range plans and the recent passage of ST3 initiative and Sound Transit

Update Capital Facilities List Reflects the current list of near-term high- capacity transit projects Update Table 16 Transit Capital Reflects current high capacity transit as Improvements adopted by transit agencies. The projects in this table are no longer limited to those listed in PSRC’s Transportation 2040 Update Figure 8 High Capacity Transit Map Reflects updates to the light rail route to Everett, BRT service on I-405 to Lynnwood, and bus stops on the SWIFT green line. 2 GPP3 Evaluation

The following evaluation criteria are taken from SCC 30.74.060(2), which are applicable to comprehensive plan amendment proposals submitted by individuals during the docket process, as guidance to determine how this county-initiated proposal is consistent with relevant state, regional, and county goals, objectives, policies, and other planning and code elements. Although county-initiated comprehensive plan amendments are not required to be evaluated according to these specified criteria in chapter 30.74 SCC, this analysis can be instructive.

Consistent with SCC 30.74.060(2) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (f) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Criterion “a”: The proposed amendment and any related proposals on the current final docket maintain consistency with other plan elements or development regulations.

Yes. Proposed amendments are necessary to maintain consistency with the Sound Transit and Community Transit long-range and system plans. There are no other inconsistencies identified with other plan elements and development regulations.

Criterion “b”: All applicable elements of the comprehensive plan, including but not limited to the capital plan and the transportation element, support the proposed amendment. Yes. All applicable elements of the GMA comprehensive plan, including the Capital Facilities Plan, the transportation policies from the General Policy Plan and the Transportation Element, support the GPP3 proposal.

Criterion “c”: The proposed amendment more closely meets the goals, objectives and policies of the comprehensive plan than the relevant existing plan or code provision. Yes. The GPP3 proposal more closely meets the goals, objectives, and policies of the comprehensive plan than the existing plan or code provisions. In particular the GPP3 amendments enhance the following policies from the county’s General Policy Plan:

Objective TR1.A: Prepare, in cooperation with the cities, the State Department for Transportation (WSDOT) regional agencies, Sound Transit, Community Transit, , standards for public transportation services and facilities consistent with adopted road standards, the land use element, and the natural environment element of the county’s comprehensive plan.

Objective TR2.D: The county cities, and transit agencies within the Southwest Urban Growth Area (UGA), will collaborate with Sound Transit to ensure planning and right-of- way preservation for a future phase of light-rail corridor development that will extend to the Everett Regional Growth Center as funding allows.

Objective TR 2.3: In cooperation with transit agencies and cities, the county will identify the general locations of major planned transit facilities in the Transportation Element and enact transit-oriented policies and development standards for locations.

Criterion “d”: The proposed amendment is consistent with the countywide planning policies (CPP). Yes. The TE GPP3 proposal is consistent with the CPP. Following are the most relevant CPP policies providing guidance for purposes of evaluating these proposed policy amendments:

3 TR-12 Each local jurisdiction served by transit should, in cooperation with transit agencies, map the general locations of planned major transit facilities in their comprehensive plans and shall enact appropriate transit-oriented policies and development standards for such locations. Where appropriate, transit-oriented development should encompass the following common elements: a. Be located to support the development of designated growth centers and existing or planned transit emphasis corridors; b. Include pedestrian-scale neighborhoods and activity centers to stimulate use of transit and ridesharing; c. Plan for appropriate intensity and mix of development – including both employment and housing options – that support transit service; d Provide safe, pleasant, and convenient access for pedestrians and bicyclists; e. Provide safe and convenient access and transfer between all forms of transit and other modes of travel; and f. Promote pricing or regulatory mechanisms to encourage transit use and reduce reliance on the automobile.

TR-13 The County, cities, and transit agencies in the Southwest Urban Growth Area (UGA) should collaborate with Sound Transit to ensure planning and right-of way preservation for a future phase of light-rail corridor development that will extend to the Everett Regional Growth Center as soon as possible. Planning for light-rail transit should: a. Be compatible with Sound Transit 2 plans for Snohomish County, which include commitments for stations in Lynnwood and Mountlake Terrace; b. Recognize and be compatible with local land use planning and urban design objectives in the Southwest UGA; and c. Include consideration and evaluation of additional transit services to major employment centers in the Southwest UGA.

Criterion “e”: The proposed amendment complies with the GMA. Yes. The GPP3 proposal is consistent with GMA Goal 3: Transportation. Encourage efficient multimodal transportation systems that are based on regional priorities and coordinated with county and city comprehensive plans.

Criterion “f”: New information is available that was not considered at the time the relevant comprehensive plan or development regulation was adopted that changes the underlying assumptions and supports the proposed amendment.

Yes. The GPP3 amendments to the Transportation Element update the high capacity transit elements of the TE so to be consistent with the Sound Transit Long-Range Plan, Sound Transit 3 Regional System Plan, and the Community Transit Development Plan. Significant changes have been made to these transit plans since the TE was adopted in 2015. This new information changes some of the underlying assumptions from the last TE update and supports the proposed amendments.

Environmental Review

All SEPA requirements with respect to this non-project action will be satisfied by the issuance

4 of an addendum to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Snohomish County GMACP 8-Year Update prior to the Planning Commission’s public hearings on the GPP3 proposal. This addendum will add information pertaining to the proposed Transportation Element amendments. However, the evaluation of this non-project action is consistent with the analysis of previously identified significant impacts of alternatives analyzed in the county’s GMA Comprehensive Plan 8-Year Update EIS dated September 8, 2014 (Draft EIS), and June 3, 2015 (FEIS), in which more significant plan changes were proposed. No new probable significant adverse environmental impacts from this proposal have been identified.

Next Steps:

A final Public Works staff report with proposed amendments, a recommendation and supporting findings will be transmitted to the Planning Commission in advance of a public hearing scheduled for May 23, 2017.

Attachments

1) Attachment 1: Proposed GPP3 - TE Text Changes 2) Attachment 2: Proposed GPP3 - High Capacity Transit Map

cc: Ken Klein, Executive Director, Executive Office Steve Thomsen, Director, Public Works Doug McCormick, Transportation and Environmental Service Director, Public Works Gina Hortillosa, Engineering Manager - Interim, Public Works Barb Mock, Director, PDS Steve Skorney, Senior Planner, PDS Yorik Stevens-Wajda, Legislative Analyst, County Council

5 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Snohomish County will cooperate with WSDOT and cities to ensure the functional integrity of state highways is maintained as growth occurs throughout the county. The county will also provide assistance and support to WSDOT’s efforts at employing access management techniques on state highways (i.e., SR 9 and SR 527). Techniques employed could include but are not limited to: adequate signal spacing; limits on new intersection and driveway accesses; use of channelization and raised medians; and construction of frontage roads.

D. Supportive City Street Improvements

Various cities are proposing to enhance capacity and traffic flow on city streets by significantly widening lanes, adding through and/or turn lanes, adding walkways, improving positive guidance and implementing traffic control revisions. The primary intent of these improvements is to enhance existing street capacity in order to safely and efficiently handle existing and future traffic on city streets. A secondary benefit to Snohomish County is that many of these city street improvements will help handle traffic generated by the county’s planned land use and the associated growth.

Appendix C presents various improvements to city streets to serve the city’s planned land use and that are supportive of the county’s comprehensive plan. The list of city projects was developed by selecting projects from the most currently available Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) and long range transportation plans for each jurisdiction. The projects had to meet the criteria of having lane capacity expansions, new roads, or street extensions to be placed on the list. Appendix C also includes four tribal road improvement projects.

E. Supportive Public Transportation Improvements

Public transportation services and facilities provide support to the county’s plans for land use by offering the public additional choices for travel. Use of public transportation tends to reduce the demand for travel by automobile, thereby mitigating traffic congestion in some of the county’s major corridors. Transit facilities and services are expected to change significantly with the arrival of Sound Transit’s (ST) Link light rail and the expansion of Community Transit’s (CT) Swift BRT.

1. Operating Agencies and Services

The primary providers of public transportation services in the County are CT, Everett Transit (ET), ST, and (WSF). , , and Island Transit also provide limited service within the County. Tulalip Transit provides rural public transportation within the Tulalip Tribes Reservation. Along with providing transit services, these public transit agencies provide transit planning and construction of transit facilities within the county in cooperation with Snohomish County, PSRC, WSDOT, local cities, and, to a limited extent, the port authorities. Transit agencies are required to annually adopt a six-year Transit Development Plan (TDP) that include capital improvements, significant changes in service and operations, and funding for program needs. A map of the transit services in Snohomish County is provided in the Inventory of Transportation Facilities and Services.

Transportation Element 74 Effective July 2, 2015 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

The County participates on an ongoing basis in coordinated planning with the transit agencies in a variety of ways, including guidance in route planning, advice on transit service compatibility with land use, and providing input to transit capital planning. Importantly, the County seeks input on proposed roadway improvements and seeks CT’s review of medium to large-scale land use development proposals where impacts to transit are determined.

Snohomish County also participates in major planning activities with the transit agencies including: development of CT’s transit development plan and Long Range Transit Plan; review of the other transit agencies’ transit development plans and planning documents; continued implementation of Swift BRT on SR 99; planning for future BRT service; and ongoing participation in ST’s planning and feasibility studies including the planning of Link light rail into Snohomish County. From this work, future transit service improvements that support the County’s preferred 2035 land use and transportation strategies are derived. a. Community Transit

CT provides fixed-route bus, paratransit (Dart), vanpool, and transportation demand management (TDM) services to most of Snohomish County. The ((current 2014-2019)) 2016- 2021 Transit Development Plan (TDP) forecasts a ((20)) 40 percent increase in bus service hours through ((2019)) 2021. The TDP ((anticipates the planning and)) includes the development of a second Swift BRT line along a possible alignment running from to Canyon Park via Airport Rd, 128th St, SR 96, and SR 527 to begin operation in 2019. In addition the TDP anticipates a third Swift BRT route operating in the 164th St/196th St corridors. This tentative third Swift route would begin operation in 2023 in time to serve the new Sound Transit light rail station in Lynnwood. The TDP ((also)) discusses additional integration of CT bus service with ST’s Link light rail when it begins operation in Mountlake Terrace and Lynnwood in 2023. Some CT express routes currently serving downtown Seattle will be duplicated by the new light rail service. The transit service hours from these redundant routes will be reallocated to meet the increased demand on local routes serving the new Link stations. (ref. 27)

CT has also adopted a Long Range Transit Plan (LRTP) that articulates the agency’s 20 year vision built around a corridor-based system. (ref. 14) In developing the plan, Community Transit worked with Snohomish County and the cities to identify transit emphasis corridors. Transit emphasis corridors provide a linkage between transit-supportive land use, transit service, and transportation infrastructure by serving as a framework for planning. Transit emphasis corridors are discussed in more detail in Chapter III. Implementation Measures. In addition, the LRTP identifies five corridors as possibilities for future BRT level of service. The location of these corridors is shown on the HCT map in Figure 8. b. Everett Transit

ET, which is part of the City of Everett government, operates local bus routes and provides paratransit service within Everett. ET provides some limited service outside of the city boundaries, including a connection to the ferry terminal in the City of Mukilteo, and transit service on key arterials in unincorporated areas adjacent to the city. ET also operates Everett Station, a multimodal transit center located near downtown Everett providing connections between Sounder commuter rail, Swift BRT, regional express bus service, local transit routes, intercity bus lines, and AMTRAK trains. No major system improvements are identified in ET’s most recent 2014-2019 transit development plan beyond minor route adjustments. (ref. 28)

Transportation Element 75 Effective July 2, 2015 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT c. Sound Transit

ST provides High Capacity Transit (HCT) services and facilities within the central . ST operates Sounder commuter rail connecting Seattle, Edmonds, Mukilteo and Everett and Link light rail currently only operating in Seattle and south King County. ST also operates six regional express bus routes serving Snohomish County, providing service between Everett, Lynnwood, Bothell, and the downtown areas of Seattle and Bellevue.

The 1993 long-range vision and the 2005 and 2015 long-range regional transit plan updates identified broadly defined corridors for commuter rail, light rail, BRT and regional express bus service, thus creating a vision for transit in the central Puget Sound Region. (ref. 29) Sound Move in 1996, ((and)) Sound Transit 2 (ST2) in 2008, and Sound Transit 3 (ST3) in 2016 created service plans((,)), and more refined ((blueprint)) blueprints for specific projects and services, for which voters approved funding. (ref. 30,31) Sound Transit has been in the process of building these projects in a phased manner.

For Snohomish County, the ST2 plan includes an extension of Link light rail service along I-5 to Mountlake Terrace and the Lynnwood Transit Center with scheduled completion in 2023. With the recent passage of Sound Transit 3 (ST3), ((An)) an extension of light rail from Lynnwood to Everett is ((also in ST’s Long Range Transit Plan)) planned to be built by 2036. ((as well as in PSRC’s Vision 2040.)) The Lynnwood to Everett ((alignment for this segment has not yet been determined)) segment proceeds along I-5 corridor with stations at Alderwood Mall, 164th St SW, and 128th St SW. The route leaves the I-5 corridor at 128th St SW with a potential station at Airport Road/SR 99, a station at the SW Everett Industrial Center near Airport Road/SR 526, and a station at SR 526/SR 99. The route continues to Everett Station along the I-5 corridor. ((A 2014 ST high-capacity transit corridor study contains possible light rail corridors which include I-5, 128th St SW/Airport Rd, SR 526, and SR 99. The potential light rail corridors are shown on the HCT map in Figure 8. (ref. 31))) These light rail extensions together with CT’s BRT corridors provide a HCT framework that will allow future employment and population growth in southwest Snohomish County. The HCT system is shown in Figure 8.

((Many changes have occurred since the adoption for the 2005 plan and ST is currently working to update the long-range plan vision. The regional bus, light rail, passenger rail, and other transit improvements are being reexamined in light of changes to land use, transportation strategies and environmental regulations in the region. The resulting analysis could lead to introducing a phase three package of additional transit and HOV improvements to voters.)) d. Washington State Ferries

Two WSF routes serve Snohomish County, providing cross-sound travel. The Edmonds-Kingston ferry operates between Edmonds and Kingston in Kitsap County. The Mukilteo-Clinton ferry operates between Mukilteo and Clinton on Whidbey Island. State-owned ferry terminals are located in both Edmonds and Mukilteo. Community Transit buses and Sounder commuter rail provide connections to both terminals. The Mukilteo terminal is also served by Everett Transit. The 2009 Washington State Ferries (WSF) Long-Range Plan presents a vision for the future that maintains current levels of service with limited improvements. (ref. 32)

2. Capital Facilities

Transportation Element 76 Effective July 2, 2015 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

The extension of light rail to Everett and the expansion of BRT represent a significant capital investment in the county’s transit infrastructure. Other important transit capital facility improvements will improve parking access to transit and create better transfers between existing Sounder rail, regional bus, local bus, and WSF services. a. Near-Term Projects

Some of the major transit capital projects included in the ST2 service plan and the transit agencies’ TDPs to be completed in the next ten years include:

. a Link light rail extension from Northgate to Lynnwood Transit Center with a station at Mountlake Terrace that will provide a ((much needed)) HCT connection to Seattle and the region; . a Mukilteo Multimodal Ferry Terminal project providing improved connection between Whidbey Island and Snohomish County with safer access for pedestrians, vehicles, and bicycles. The new facility also ensures reliable connections to other transportation modes such as Sounder rail service and transit; ((and)) . a Swift II Bus Rapid Transit route along Airport Rd/128th St/SR 96/ SR 527 connecting Boeing/Paine Field with Canyon Park in Bothell. The Swift II project includes new BRT buses, 31 BRT stations at 16 intersections, and a station at Canyon Park Park & Ride; . a Seaway Transit Center providing a northern terminus for the Swift II BRT line and connects Boeing/Paine Field with transit service from CT, ET, King County Metro, and private employer shuttles. . a Swift III Bus Rapid Transit route along 196th St SW connecting Alderwood Mall, Lynnwood Light Rail Station, and Edmonds Community College. The Swift III project will include new BRT stations and BRT buses. . a Swift III Bus Rapid Transit route along 164th St SW connecting SR 527 and SR 99. The Swift III project will include new BRT stations and BRT buses. . a new park-and-ride lot near SR-525/Harbour Pointe, ((a transit center near Smokey Point,)) additional parking at the Mukilteo Multimodal terminal, and improvement projects at the Swamp Creek and Ash Way park and rides that will ease parking shortages and create additional transit system access points((.)) and . a I-5 approach eastbound widening on 128th St SW for Swift II BRT to maintain speed and reliability for the new Swift II service. Modifications include a transit queue jump and a new right turn lane. b. Transportation 2040 Projects

The PSRC’s Transportation 2040 provides a long range multi-modal transportation plan projected to be completed by the year 2040. Projects that are in the “constrained” portion of the plan are those the region reasonably expects to be able to fund by 2040. Table 16 provides a list of those major transit capital projects included in the Transportation 2040 constrained plan. (ref. 6)

Transportation Element 77 Effective July 2, 2015 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Table 16

High Capacity Transit ((Capital)) Improvements for Snohomish County ((in the Constrained Portion of PSRC’s Transportation 2040 Plan))

Expected Project Agency Description Completion Link Light Rail extension from the Northgate Link Light Rail station to the Lynnwood Transit Center with extension to ST stations at Jackson Park and Shoreline in 2023 Lynnwood King County, and Montlake Terrace and Lynnwood in Snohomish County. Link Light Rail Link Light Rail extension from the Lynnwood extension from ST ((2040))2036 Transit Center to Everett Lynnwood to Everett BRT service on I-405 from Lynnwood Transit Sound Transit Bus Center to Canyon Park P&R and extending Rapid Transit on I- ST 2024 south with multiple stops in King County 405 down to Burien. BRT and transit priority infrastructure from Swift Bus Rapid CT and Everett Station to Smokey Point via Transit on Smokey unidentified 2030 Broadway, SR 529, State Ave, and Smokey Point Corridor agency Point Blvd. Swift Bus Rapid Transit ((on))along CT ((and BRT and transit priority infrastructure from Airport unidentified Paine Field to SR 9 via Airport Rd, 128th St ((2030))2019 ((Way))Rd/128th agency)) SW, SR 96, and ((Cathcart Way)) SR 527. St/SR 96/SR 527((Corridor)) ((Swift Bus Rapid ((CT and ((BRT and transit priority infrastructure on Transit on the SR unidentified SR 524 (196th SW and Filbert Rd) from the ((2030)) 524 Corridor)) agency)) Edmonds Ferry Terminal to SR 527.)) BRT and transit priority infrastructure Swift Bus Rapid CT and tentatively serving the Edmonds Community Transit on 196th St unidentified 2023 College, the Lynnwood light rail station, and SW agency Alderwood Mall. CT and Swift Bus Rapid ((unidentifie BRT and transit priority infrastructure on Transit on 164th St d agency)) ((2030))2023 164th St SW/SE from SR 99 to SR 527. SW/SE local agencies ((CT and ((Swift Bus Rapid ((BRT and transit priority infrastructure on unidentified ((2030)) Transit on SR 527)) SR 527 from downtown Bothell to I-5)) agency)) Parking Garage at Construct parking structure with 500 parking Lynnwood Transit ST stalls 2023 Center

Parking Garage at ST Development of 130 additional structured 2023

Transportation Element 78 Effective July 2, 2015 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

Mukilteo Sounder parking spaces for the use of Sounder riders Station in a joint-use parking garage developed as part of the Mukilteo Multimodal Terminal with WSDOT Develop new multimodal terminal for ferry, Mukilteo Multimodal WSDOT rail, bus, pedestrian, and bicycle. 2017 Terminal Expand/relocate the current terminal. Source: PSRC ((2012)) Transportation 2040, Community Transit Transit Development Plan 2016 – 2021, Sound Transit 2, Sound Transit 3

Transportation Element 79 Effective July 2, 2015 SNOHOMISH COUNTY TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT

20. MAKERS Architecture and Urban Design, 2012, Evergreen Way/SR 99 Corridor Revitalization.

21. Snohomish County, 2014 Safe Kids, Improved Pathways (SKIP). Web. 22 July 2014. http://snohomishcountywa.gov/572/Safe-Kids-Improved-Pathways-SKIP>.

22. Snohomish County, 2012. Engineering Design and Development Standards.

23. National Climate Assessment (NCA), 2014, Climate Change Impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment.

24. Snohomish County, 2007, Snohomish County Executive Order 07-48

25. Snohomish County, 2013, Snohomish County Executive Order 13-48A

26. Comprehensive Plan 2015 Update Draft EIS. Volume II: Transportation. 2014. Prepared for Snohomish County by Fehr & Peers.

27. Community Transit, ((2014)) 2016. Transit Development Plan ((2014-2019)) 2016-2021.

28. Everett Transit, 2014. Transit Development Plan 2014-2019.

29. Sound Transit, ((2005)) 2015. Regional Transit Long-Range Plan.

30. Sound Transit, 2008. Sound Transit 2: The Regional Transit System Plan for Central Puget Sound. (( 31. Sound Transit 2014. High Capacity Transit Corridor Study Lynnwood to Everett Final Report.)) 31. Sound Transit 2016. Sound Transit 3: The Regional Transit System Plan for Central Puget Sound.

32. Washington State Department of Transportation Ferries Division, 2009. Final Long-Range Plan.

33. Snohomish County, 2009. Capital Facilities Plan.

34. Comprehensive Plan 2015 Update Final EIS. Volume II: Transportation. 2015. Prepared for Snohomish County by Fehr & Peers.

35. Puget Sound Regional Council, 2012, Transportation 2040: Final Environmental Impact Statement.

Transportation Element 97 Effective July 2, 2015

S m

d o

R k

e

y y

e

l P

l

o

a

i

V n

t

y B B r p u l p r F v n D d a e r R n a H d i n E r k W

N a N W

M a e e t v v

e A

A

r

s d

h R n t

2 d 7

3 L 4 a k 188th St NE e w o W

N

o

E d Rd e

v

N

A

e

h

v

t

0

A

4

d Arlington r Lakewood Rd 531 3 M

a ?@ W r

i N

n 172nd St NW

e d R D 531 r J

e d o d ?@ r a v d l R a R n B R n 531 c d i

t

E

?@ M n w F N i

o d

o r E

e o t

y P

v N

o E F

A y

i e G v N

e

v

e h

t k

e e

R A

o k 9 v d d

1 h a

A

R m t

L

t

7

S

n s

i 6

1 W

w 5

E K d a N o y o a e 152 k G nd St NE P v o e A i k n W t a d r R L N

?|@ d 3

E e 2

v

A

h

t

6

140th St NW 1 140th St NE

132nd St M NE a rine Dr 3 E 4 t

N B h u

e J A r o v n r

v d E

A a e R n

N

t d R N s d

e 1 E

v 5

A

h 116th St NE t

7

6

E Granite

N

108th St NE !"`$ e

E v

N A

h

e

t

v

9

A

5 Falls

1 100th S h t NE t 100th St NE

9

9

e v

A E N

e

E t r

a

D N t

h

S e t

v 8 4

A 88th St N

E d

r

3

6 84th St NE 84th St NE 84th St NE 1

E

N R e o v b e

A

-

M

h

t

e

7 n

2 Marysville z

M e

l a R

r ?¼@ d in e D r

64th St NE E

N

528

E

e

N ?@ v

A

e

v E d

r

A

N

3

h

2 r t

1

D 7

e 6 in ar M

48th St NE

44th S E t NE N 44th St NE

e

v

A

E S 7

h u N

1 t n

s e 9

n t

v 9

A

y A

v s N

d e i r ?¼@ d M

3 e N

8

a C B E

l c d v a d h R l

l i g o a

r

So w s

per Hill Rd e

R b

R d

w d

e

Wy N ark P en nde Lu Ve rn on R 16th St NE d

Lake E

N

e

e v S

v 529 e

A

A v

t M ?@ e y s

A

v

a

a

1

t

A d c

d 3 w u h v y

1

l R d Stevens i n

b a l

l

a s

B o a s

o n

r e

C e R

B W v

d i e d

t s

y S n d e d n E 19th St k l R u S Mi l R a K ?ö@ S O O L e s K

v

E e i E M

A

S v i

l t l a

s R

e

23rd D d St v

1

r

9

A

S

D

h

t w d M 9 e ac i R h 9 s ias V Steve n Cu Everett Ave e e to k C

n d f i a f r R a L a ias rls S h M o ac n 20th St SE M R W )g 20th St SE S d

# e d

v

Æb R

\ A

" o J #

r

y E

e

l a

d S

a

w v R

e C

a \ d

s v

n r a C

e A e

v o

t

e s

r t

!"`$ s w

B ke S La 1

S e

\ 7

l l

1

R

E d

# S

Dubuque Rd \ E e

v

S

A D ub

e Rd uqu h v e t qu e \ ?|@ u A b R 7

u E d G D d

8

d S

r l R or

e St m 3 e n s

4 v L n a \ a w i A k h t o e o Bunk c s R y F a 1 d d # o

s 7 d A W 52 s M v nd St SE 1 l v R E Æb n Skipley Rd B e d e S o S

e ilt e uk r M e e g

v r v e Everett A A

kwy v 56th St SE y

P h E B

k b t ee l r i 9 C o c M ll H erri k 3

C a 60th St SE f d 1 r o

d E r R e d S M s s o A e a e r n # v i o v h R R F e

A c d

d o s a t d e r

r M 3 s Rd S e

8 k e Three La l S v o A u g

y h

a 72nd St SE

R E # w d

* d S

a

o e

r v

B

A

t

" s 526 J 1

d J" SnohomRish 3 v ?@ l i 1 W C v E B asino Rd

e S # d r

l # v * e

e i

i e v L w R

F d L A

E o ow t e w e

S l s n l- i e S n 88th St SE 1

a e o E l h l o 7

v P - m E

S L i 1

s A h S a R t e i h r v 2nd S v e t i 9 m r R

7

A d e

h r t R 100th St SW # 7

525 2 d A *# 100th St SE y ?@ i r r )g

E p D W o y S t d r ll r estwick R t o W M R e o

H v E

p

u d r

i

A S

k

i A l h e t t

e v o 9

A

1

S Marsh R d h p 112th St SW t e d 9 e R *# 5 d k # 1 r a w P a ly W y r 116th St SE ve e

Mukilteo v e B d !< A Blv

h

E e t int E

4

# S bour Po ar S E

H

d

r e

S

v

R D

e

A t

l

v h t

G h e

A i t

b 0 s v 12 t o 8th St SW 5 1

n e s

R 3

d s Picn 1

*# o i *# *# 527 5 c d W Lo P in R ?@ we o o t e # ll-L R R k * ari r v mer R d " a J ?¿@ A d 4th P *# 1 y 34 rl ?½@ th e Pl v r S O e E ld B D S k n # y d r o a h Sh W R o

y l P e l r m

r i

lb # t h * D i y o W H e s R g h d n s

h e u i - a Mill l e M s t P t m d M o d A R a ek 14 146th St SW o a n Cre 8th St SW e h c r ds

o o

s d o o

Fisher R 150th S e a n W St 148th St SE H # C SW S w W Creek e y

v

e

W

v

A

e

A

y

v

a

h

A t *#

w

5

d y W d

3

n W l a

2

P o

5 h r 525 s d ?@ A B n " 2 J 164th St SW

16 y # 8th S * t SW W 164th St SE

y h

W c

h r

s a E W

L

A S e El v lio e W Ben Howard

v tt R A R d r e d

A

v h !"`$ D

t

A

# h

6 t

w h

7 t 5 Monroe e

i 6 3

3 V 180th St SW ic E W

p l 18 li m e 0th St SE o d y v t l t

A *# 180th R St SE y R 522 O W h h d t h ?@ W c t

4 Lynnwood r r

e 6

a o

v 188th St SW L

E N

A

S

h

W t H i

Edmonds 8 e g

e h

8 v v 527 B

A A

r ?@ i h J" d h

t 196th St SW t g 4 d e

5

4

3 R R 524

s d

e e ?@ W

W l # v y e

e a 20 A W 0th

S v t SW W v #

*

F y d y

r A

e A

?õ@ a

v a l h

h R W t \ A p t

w

4 \ 8 o n

h s

d 2

2

t

P s o

a \ 8 e s

6 r o " 204th S p r J t SW Main St m

y B \ a Æb C y W D

S h

c y \ ar W e !"`$ L L h v St arc d 212 t h S W 524 A R *# \ ?@ e

h

W k

t W

W %&e( a

E

5 n L

y e t

e W e W c

c s e

v \ v e

e h v e

A W Ma A ltby R r v d

v

A E o

h A

h A C

t

t \ t d S

# h

6 h s L

6

n

t

t u

220 7 t 6 W h St SW e W 2 c 8

4 a v

5 o

4 4 P e e k

\ L a A

v e v ra

A d R h A i t s Brier

\ h e d

t h 9 L t

0 a 3 4 \ \ 0 k e \ 1 *# Woodway ?¿@ R 228th St SW Mountlake Bothell ?|@ 522 d 228th St SE ?@

W 228th e St S 1 E

v

4

S Terrace y

A t

h e

v

h W

t A

t A

4 236t

h St SW v s

n

8 ?Ä@ e

d

u H a

P L

i " i

J R c g

W d a a

i h

r

o r

r k

e

L e a

# i e B

r

d

M r

B

R

i

i d

240th St SE - e s l

l d e

h i g s v e i n

i m R d o

h o d d o o R S n W

All m aps, data, and info rm atio n set fo rth h erein (“Data”), are fo r Figure 8 illustrative purpo ses o nly and are no t to be co nsidered an o fficial citatio n to , o r representatio n o f, th e Sno h o m ish Co unty Co de. High Capacity Transit PRELIMINARY Am endm ents and updates to th e Data, to geth er w ith o th er applicable Co unty Co de pro visio ns, m ay apply w h ich are no t depicted h erein. \ Sno h o m ish Co unty m akes no representatio n o r w arranty co ncerning th e State Ferry Ro ute Inco rpo rated City Interstate High w ay co ntent, accuracy, currency, co m pleteness o r quality o f th e Data SNOHOMISH co ntained h erein and expressly disclaim s any w arranty o f Sound Transit Light Rail - ST 2 & 3 m erch antability o r fitness fo r any particular purpo se. All perso ns "J Planned Ligh t Rail Statio n & Ro ute Tulalip Reservatio n Arterial Ro adw ay accessing o r o th erw ise using th is Data assum e all respo nsibility fo r use COUNTY !< th ereo f and agree to h o ld Sno h o m ish Co unty h arm less fro m and against Pro visio nal Ligh t Rail Statio n any dam ages, lo ss, claim o r liability arising o ut o f any erro r, defect o r

UGA Bo undary Railro ad Planned Bus Rapid Transit o m issio n co ntained w ith in said Data. W ash ingto n State Law, Ch . 42.56 2015 GMA RCW , pro h ibits state and lo cal agencies fro m pro viding access to lists o f Community Transit SWIFT Bus Co unty Bo undary W ater individuals intended fo r use fo r co m m ercial purpo ses and, th us, no # Existing SW IFT Ro ute & Sto p co m m ercial use m ay be m ade o f any Data co m prising lists o f individuals COMPREHENSIVE co ntained h erein. *# Pro po sed SW IFT Ro ute & Sto p Th e Co nso lidated Bo ro ugh o f Quil Ceda Village PLAN Future SW IFT Ro ute Sound Transit Sounder Train Æb So under Statio n UPDATE So under Train Ro ute ¯ 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles