DOCSLIB.ORG

Identification and Nesting Sites of North American Species of Dolichoderus Lund (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Clifford Johnson University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Identification and Nesting Sites of North American Species of Dolichoderus Lund (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Clifford Johnson University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida 3-1-1989 Identification and Nesting Sites of North American Species of Dolichoderus Lund (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Clifford Johnson University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Johnson, Clifford, "Identification and Nesting Sites of North American Species of Dolichoderus Lund (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)" (1989). Insecta Mundi. Paper 464. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/464 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Vol. 3, No. 1, March 1989 1 Identification and Nesting Sites of North American Species of Dolichoderus Lund (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Clifford Johnson Department of Zoology University of Florida Gainesville, Florida 3261 1 Abstract pretation remained intact for 43 years. Creighton (1950) synonymized Wheeler's subspecific forms The identification of North American Dolichod- into the four above species and again recognized D. erus species by-way-of existing keys is unnecessarily pustulatus as distinct. The taxonomic scenario arbitrary and misdeterminations are likely between returned to the 1886 position and, for the above D. mariae and D. pustulatus, the latter species taxa, remains unmodified. The need for further showing most morphological variation over its literature on the identity of these species requires a range. Diagnoses for the four described species and brief explanation. an undescribed form with a revised key and figures Wheeler's studies had accompanying descrip- are given to aid entomologists working without tions and figures but are now largely unavailable identified voucher specimens. Nest data for species and he employed a taxonomy no longer in use. other than D. pustulatus in the Coastal Plain re- Smith (1918) and Gregg (1944) gave non-illustrated vealed below-ground nests or structures immediate- keys and essentially followed Wheeler's work. ly at the ground sui-face. Colonies of D. pustulatus in Wheeler and Creighton in addition to having differ- Florida and southern Georgia have arboreal nests in ent taxonomic views used different diagnostic char- the cavities of smaller limbs of hardwoods about acters in large part. Creighton's key had no accom- swamps and marshes. No ground nests have been panying descriptions or figures and no later key found and the species may occur in compound nests exists. The Creighton key requires discrimination with another arboreal ant, Camponotus (Colobop- between degrees of sculptural development and, if sis) impressus. These observations identify several unaccompanied by properly determined voucher questions for further study. specimens, is especially unclear in separating D. mariae and D. pustulatus. For sculpture of the Introduction propodeum and mesonotum, couplet three of the key uses "... coarse, deep, close-set foveolae" and "... This paper provides a revised key to the known foveolae, when present, shallow and obscure..." to species of Dolichoderus Lund 1831 occurring in depict D. pustulatus and D. mariae respectively. North America, and summarizes the data on both Actual differences between the species in sculpture distributions and nest sites. An undescribed, north- of the propodeum or epinotum as named by Creigh- eastern species known by limited material is also ton, are less distinct than the couplet suggests. briefly characterized and included in the key but not Further, the key appears to have been written using named. Four species have been described; namely, only northern specimens of D. pustulatus and D. mariae Fore1 1884, D. plagiatus Mayr 1870, D. southern specimens are somewhat different as noted pustulatus Mayr 1886 and D. taschenbergi Mayr below. The author earlier misidentified Florida 1866. These species were thus described by 1886 specimens of D. pustulatus (Johnson, 1986), and and 31 years later Wheeler (1905a, b, 1915, 1916, other specimens in the Florida State Collection of 1917) had revised the group, described several Arthropods are similarly misnamed. The authority subspecific varieties and discussed their natural for those determinations is not given but doubtlessly history. His principle change was to place D. pustu- arose from a similar confusion. latus as a subspecies of D. plagiatus and his inter- Insecta Mundi Since properly identified specimens are restrict- A diagnostic worker description and geographic ed to only a few institutions, a more functional key distribution for each species precedes the key. Hairs is desirable. The key given here groups the charac- portrayed in the figures are drawn slightly thicker ters in a hopefully less arbitrary fashion and is than true proportions so they would not become supported by descriptions and figures. indistinct on reduction; this treatment in no way The generic placement for the North American affects the use of the key. The reader should com- forms has been questioned. Mayr (1886) established pare specimens with both the description and key in the subgenus Hypoclinea including the North reaching determinations. American forms, and the possibility of raising that Data on nests other than observations reported name to a full genus has subsequently appeared in for D. pustulatus in the South were taken from the the literature. Lattke (1986) recently recognized the cited literature. group as a distinct genus in a study concerned with neotropical ants. However, no formal revision or Species Diagnoses description of Hypoclinea as a genus exists and the species Lattke treats are quite unlike our northern Dolichoderus mariae fauna. This paper retains the genus Dolichoderus for the North American forms and, with this usage, Worker Diagnosis: The species is basically bicolored. the type species of the subgenus Hypoclinea is The mandibles, antennae, head, alitrunk, legs, and Dolichoderus quadripunctatus Linnaeus of Europe. petiole are brownish-orange and the first segment of The great majority of specimens coming to the gaster has a variable, anterior band of this light- entomologists' attention are workers. Queens are er color. The remainder of the gaster is dark brown typically taken in association with workers and the to black. Intensity of color varies from callow age to key is designed to identify the worker caste. Males maturity in ants and somewhat through time for are rarely collected and too incompletely known for museum specimens. I have seen museum specimens treatment in a key. Workers of Dolichoderus in of Dolichoderus over 50 years of age, however, with North America may be recognized by the following essentially the same color as found in recently col- characters. Total body lengths range from about 3.5 lected material. Also color interpretation varies. to 4.5 mm. or rarely less with no differences be- Wheeler (1905a) described this species as "... yellow- tween species. The gaster and alitrunk are separated ish blood-red, and gaster black", and also as by a single segment, the petiole. The orifice of the "...bright-red and blue-black bodies". cloaca is a horizontally-oriented slit, not a circular Structurally, a fine granulation sculptures the opening. The surrounding hairs do not form a dis- integument of head, pro- and mesothorax, and faint tinct fringe of rather stiff erect bristles about the depressions or foveolae also occur on the head. This opening. The posterior or declivous face of the sculpture is weak, leaving a superficially smooth, propodeum is distinctly concave in lateral view and shining surface under low to moderate magnifica- the propodeum cuticle is thick, inflexible, and tion. A more distinct granulation sculptures the strongly sculptured. These ants occur mainly in the propodeum where a network of delicate ridges East with the western-most records in North enclose shallow polygon-like depressions. This Dakota and Oklahoma. sculpture is weak leaving a shining propodeum in strong light. The integument of petiole and especial- Materials and Methods ly the gaster is smooth and reflective. No erect hairs exist on head, scapes, or body, one of the more dis- Specimens of the four known species have been tinctive attributes of this species. In dorsal view, the studied from the George C. and J. Wheeler Collec- length of the propodeum distinctly exceeds its width, tion, including material determined by well-recog- Fig. la. The lateral profile of alitrunk as in Fig. 2a. nized authorities on North American ants, namely The integument within the concavity of the decli- M.W. Wheeler, M. R. Smith and W. S. Creighton. D. vous face of propodeum with a series of fine vertical R. Smith of the U.S. National Museum kindly con- ridges or striations; some specimens have a distinct, firmed the determination of recently-collected Flori- centrally-located vertical ridge. A delicate granula- da material of D. pustulatus. The undescebed form tion within the concavity reduces reflectivity often to is known only by a small nest series taken recently a near-opaque state. by J.C. Trager in Massachusetts. Definitions of morphological terms appear in Torre-Bueno (1962) Geographic Distribution: The type locality isvineland, or most standard insect references. New Jersey.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Ants of Oklahoma Master of Science
    THE ANTS OF OKLAHOMA By Jerry H. Young(I\" Bachelor of Science Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College Stillwater, Oklahoma 1955 Submitted to the faculty of the Graduate School of the Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE January 1 1956 tl<lAWMA AGCMCl«.f�Al L �Ci'!AlttCAl e&U.Ull LIBRARY JUL16195 6 THE ANTS OF OKLAHOMA Thesis Approved: Thesis Adviser }>JcMem��f � 't'" he Thesis ) Committee Member of the Thesis Committee 7'4'.��Member of the Thesis Committee Head of the Department ifean of the Graduate School 361565 ii PREFACE The study of the distribution of ants in the United States has been a long and continuous process with many contributors, but the State of Oklahoma has not received the attentions of these observers to any great extent. The only known list of ants of Oklahoma is one prepared by Mo Ro Smith (1935)0 Early in 1954 a survey of the state of Oklahoma was made to determine the species present and their distributiono The results of this survey, which blanketed the entire State, are given in this paper. The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dro Do E. Howell, chairman of the writer's thesis committee, for his valuable assistance and careful guidance in the preparation of this papero Also, much guidance on preparation of this manuscrip_t was received from Drs. Do Eo Bryan, William H. Irwin and F. A. Fenton. Many of the determin­ ations were made by M. R. Smith.. Vital infonnation was obtained from the museums at Oklahoma Agricultural and Mechanical College and the University of Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) by Diethe Ortius
    A DOLICHODERUS TASCHENBERGI QUEEN FOUND IN A POLYGYNOUS COLONY OF D. PLAGIATUS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) BY DIETHE ORTIUS Theodor-Boveri-Institut LS ftir Verhaltensphysiologie und Soziobiologie Am Hubland, D-97074 Wtirzburg, Germany ABSTRACT Very little is known about colony founding strategies and social organization of the four North American species of the ant genus Dolichoderus. I here report the finding of a Dolichoderus taschen- bergi queen in a colony of D. plagiatus, which suggests parasitic colony founding may occur occasionally in Dolichoderus taschen- bergi. In addition, the colony contained three reproductively active queens of D. plagiatus, indicating that this species is facultatively polygynous. INTRODUCTION The ant genus Dolichoderus Lund is represented by four species in North America (Creighton, 1950): mariae Forel, plagiatus Mayr, pustulatus Mayr, and taschenbergi Mayr. Except for studies by Kannowski (1959, 1967) on the flight activities of these species and a review by Johnson (1989) of their distribution and nest sites, very little is known about the life histories of North American Dolichoderus. Several authors (Wheeler, 1905a; Cole, 1940; Carter, 1962a, b; Wheeler and Wheeler, 1963) have described below-ground nest structures and leaf litter nests for all four North American Dolichoderus. D. plagiatus is considered to be monogy- nous (Kannowski, 1967) and nuptial flights are known to occur between mid June and July (Kannowski, 1959). Among the 12 colonies censused by Kannowski (1967), one colony contained two queens, which, however, he did not dis- sect. The majority of the D. plagiatus colonies investigated by Manuscript received 4 March 1995. 147 148 Psyche [Vol. 102 Kannowski (1967) were monogynous, and the single polygynous colony found was interpreted as either a consequence of pleometrotic colony foundation (primary polygyny) or the adoption of young mated queens (secondary polygyny).
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated List of the Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Found in Fort Washington and Piscataway National Parks, Maryland
    AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) FOUND IN FORT WASHINGTON AND PISCATAWAY NATIONAL PARKS, MARYLAND Theodore W. Suman Principal Investigator Theodore W. Suman, Ph.D. 7591 Polly's Hill Lane Easton, Maryland 21601 (410) 822 1204 [email protected] 'C ,:; ~) 71' 5 ?--- / I &, ·-1 U..~L:, 1 AN ANNOTATED LIST OF THE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) FOUNDINFORTWASHINGTONANDPISCATAWAYNATIONALPARKS, MARYLAND Theodore W. Suman The ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) listed in this report represent the results of a two-year (2002 - 2003) survey conducted in Fort Washington and Piscataway National Parks located in southwestern Prince Georges and northwestern Charles Counties, Maryland. This survey is part of the National Parks Service effort to broaden knowledge of the biodiversity occurring within the National Parks and was conducted under Permit # NACE-2002-SCI-0005 and Park-assigned Study Id. # NACE-00018. Table 1 is the result of this survey and consists of an alphabetical list (by subfamily, genus, and species) of all of the ant species found in both Parks. Information on the number of specimens collected, caste, date collected, and habitat is also included. Table 2 lists species found in only one or the other of the two Parks. General information on the collecting dates, collecting and extracting methods, and specific collecting sites is described below. COLLECTING DATES Collecting dates were spread throughout the spring to fall seasons of 2002 and 2003 to maximize the probability of finding all the species present. Collecting dates for each Park are listed separately. FORT WASHINGTON 2002 -27 March; 2,23 April; 20 May; 21,23 August; 12,25 September 2003 - 8 May; 12,26 June PISCATAWAY PARK 2002-9,16 April; 21 May; 24 June; 1 July 2003 - 20,30 May; 5 November 2 COLLECTING AND EXTRACTING METHODS Specimens were collected on site by the following methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The University of Manitoba in Partial Fulfillment Of
    SOME ANT-APHID ASSOCTATTONS IN MANITOBA I^TÏTH OBSERVATIONS ON INTERACTIONS BETI^IEEN Formica oreas comptula I^IIIEELER AND APHIDS AT BTRDS HTLL PARK, MANITOBA A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies The University of Manitoba by Mary Catherine Anne Madder In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Entomology October L978 f/,9R¡rnlçs SOMT ANT.APHID ASSÛCIATIt)NS IN MANÏTOBA I.IiTH OBSERVAT I(]NS CN INTTRACT IC)NS BET!,.ITEN Formica orç!q comp'bula l,lHETLER AND APHIDS AT BIRDS IIILL PARK, MANITOBA BY MARY CATHER.TNT ANNE il4ADDER A <lissertution submitted to the Faculty of Cra¿åuate Stuclies <¡f ttre Urriversity of Manitobu in partiir! fulfillment ol' tfue requirernents ol' tl¡e degrce of MASTER OF SCIENCT o" 1978 Fer¡nission hi¡s ber:¡r grurttcd to the LlllRAll'Y OF'TCI!: [JNIVUÈì- StTY OF MAN¡TO!ìA to lcnd or scll copies of tltås dissertatiol¡. to the NAT¡Ol"¿AL LIBRARY OF (IANADA to nlicrol'ilsn tltis rlissertatio¡r and tt¡ lend or sell cr.rpies of tl¡e filnl, und UNIVUIIStTV M!CIì,ûFILMS to publlsh at¡ ubstruct of this dissertation. The autltr¡r reserves other publieutit¡n rigfits, a¡ld neither tlte dissertation ¡ror extensivc cxtructs f rom it ntuy be printerJ or r-¡thcr- wise reproclucecl without thc autl¡or's writtctr irertttlssitltt. DEDÏCATIOT{ Dedicated to Gladys and Jimmie Carter of Corkery, Ontario (for all the happy summers) and to my Mother ]-I ACKNOI'TLEDGEMENTS r wish to express my gratitude to Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 15 753 Hill 12.Indd
    2010 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 9(1):73–84 The Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fauna of Black Belt Prairie Remnants in Alabama and Mississippi JoVonn G. Hill1,* and Richard L. Brown1 Abstract - Extensive areas of prairie were once found in the southeastern United States; however, in the last 200 years much of this habitat type has been destroyed. The largest of these prairie regions, the Black Belt Prairie, extends through por- tions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee. The ant fauna of these endangered grasslands has not been well documented; therefore, a survey was initiated, with collections made at 23 Black Belt Prairie remnants in Alabama and Mississippi dur- ing a four-year period. A total of 53 ant species, in six subfamilies and 25 genera were collected. Six exotic species were collected, and 11 species were found to be restricted to trees within the prairie, resulting in 36 species that likely represent the true prairie fauna. Introduction “In the fi elds the grass is short, no bush; the soil in places is a lead color, yel- low underneath, within the abode of the ants, and very stiff.” - Benjamin Hawkins (1938) on traveling through a Black Belt Prairie in Lowndes County, AL in 1798–99. Prior to European settlement, the southeastern United States had several regions dominated by grasslands or prairie (DeSelm and Murdock 1993, Peacock and Schauwecker 2003). One such region, called the “Black Belt,” extends in an arc from McNairy County, TN to Russell County, AL. Instead of being a continuous swath of open grassland, the historic landscape of the Black Belt was a heterogeneous landscape of prairies and several types of forest (see Barone 2005 for extensive references).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Impacts of Climate Change on Ant Biodiversity in the Temperate Forest Communities of the Northeastern United States
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations Dissertations and Theses Fall November 2014 TURNING UP THE HEAT ON THE LITTLE THINGS THAT RUN THE WORLD: EVALUATING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ANT BIODIVERSITY IN THE TEMPERATE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES Israel Del Toro University of Massachusetts - Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2 Part of the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Del Toro, Israel, "TURNING UP THE HEAT ON THE LITTLE THINGS THAT RUN THE WORLD: EVALUATING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ANT BIODIVERSITY IN THE TEMPERATE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES" (2014). Doctoral Dissertations. 176. https://doi.org/10.7275/vk8p-ae52 https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/176 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TURNING UP THE HEAT ON THE LITTLE THINGS THAT RUN THE WORLD: EVALUATING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ANT BIODIVERSITY IN THE TEMPERATE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented by ISRAEL DEL TORO Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts Amherst in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY SEPTEMBER 2014 Organismic and Evolutionary Biology © Copyright by Israel Del Toro 2014 All Rights Reserved TURNING UP THE HEAT ON THE LITTLE THINGS THAT RUN THE WORLD: EVALUATING THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE ON ANT BIODIVERSITY IN THE TEMPERATE FOREST COMMUNITIES OF THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED STATES A Dissertation Presented by ISRAEL DEL TORO Approved as to style and content by: _______________________________________ Aaron M.
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna of Black Belt Prairie Remnants in Alabama and Mississippi Author(S): Jovonn G
    The Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fauna of Black Belt Prairie Remnants in Alabama and Mississippi Author(s): JoVonn G. Hill and Richard L. Brown Source: Southeastern Naturalist, 9(1):73-84. 2010. Published By: Eagle Hill Institute DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1656/058.009.0106 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1656/058.009.0106 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non- commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. 2010 SOUTHEASTERN NATURALIST 9(1):73–84 The Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Fauna of Black Belt Prairie Remnants in Alabama and Mississippi JoVonn G. Hill1,* and Richard L. Brown1 Abstract - Extensive areas of prairie were once found in the southeastern United States; however, in the last 200 years much of this habitat type has been destroyed. The largest of these prairie regions, the Black Belt Prairie, extends through por- tions of Alabama, Mississippi, and Tennessee.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Ant Micros
    SOME ANT MACROS Anthony Thomas Email: mothman AT nbnet.nb.ca Introduction See the article “Some Fly Macros” in the April 2015 issue of Micscape Magazine for an introduction to my macro photography. Here 12 of the ant genera found locally are imaged to show some of the various forms these tiny insects exhibit. In other parts of the world there are some really bizarre ants; many illustrated in AntWeb. The common names used here are from Ellison et al. 2012. “A Field Guide to the Ants of New England”. Yale University Press. The Ants Ants, of course, are Insects in the Order: Hymenoptera which includes the bees, wasps, and sawflies as well as the ants. The ants are placed in their own Family: Formicidae. The family is further subdivided into Subfamilies, Genera, and finally Species. In North America there are 10 Subfamilies, 73 Genera, and about 1,000 species. Where I live in New Brunswick, Canada, there are perhaps 15 genera and about 60 species. Within genera species identification is often difficult. However, it is relatively easy to place an ant into its correct genus. Most local ants are small, about 5mm or less for the workers and perhaps 13mm for the queens of some of the larger species. At 5mm the workers make interesting subjects for macro-photography; here I will show some of the different genera I have been able to find in the last couple of years. 1] Subfamily Ponerinae, The Wretched, Laboring Ants, Ponera These are regarded as primitive ants more closely related to the wasps than are the other subfamilies.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Report
    Preliminary Survey of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) of the Big Thicket Region of Texas. JoVonn G. Hill The Big Thicket region of Texas is a southerly tilted topographical basin bounded between the Trinity and Sabine rivers in southeast Texas (Watson 2006). The Big Thicket has been called " the biological crossroads of North America", as species from the east and west occur relatively near each other within a mosaic of habitats such as arid sandylands, bottomland hardwood forests and cypress sloughs, palmetto hardwood flats, wetland pine savannah, upland pine forests, and mixed grass prairies (NPS 2010). Over 1,396 species of plants, 185 species of birds, and 60 reptile species have been documented within the Big Thicket (Big Thicket Association 2014). Since the 1930s, the Thicket has had a very active army of citizen scientists who have fought for the conservation of the region’s biota. In 1974, all their efforts paid off when the Big Thicket National Preserve was established (it was also the first National Preserve in U.S. history). The preserve consists of over 100,000 acres in 15 units spread out across seven counties. Additionally, The Nature Conservancy, the state of Texas, and several other entities have preserves established throughout the region. In 2006, an All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI) began in the Big Thicket to document every living species within the region. As part of the ATBI, surveys of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and grasshoppers began in 2011, and should continue for at least another year. Among insects, ants are typically the most dominant and influential force in terrestrial ecosystems, often comprise a large amount of the animal biomass, and are very sensitive to habitat changes making them ideal choices for such baseline inventories such as the ATBI.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science
    Revision of the Checklist of Indiana Ants with the Addition of Five New Species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Jack R. Munsee and Wilmar B. Jansma Department of Life Sciences Indiana State University, Terre Haute, Indiana 47809 and John R. Schrock, Department of Entomology, Kansas University, Lawrence, Kansas 66044 Introduction In 1967, the list of Indiana ants by Morris (4) was revised and expanded to in- clude nine species not previously reported from the State (7). In 1979, an extensive revision of the catalog of the Hymenoptera in America (which includes two supplements) was published by Krombein, Hurd, et al (3). Because of the 1979 revision of the Catalog and the collecting by Schrock of five species of ants new to the State, it was felt that a revision of the checklist of Indiana ants was in order, as well as offering some infor- mation about Schrock's five species of ants. Morris (4) included 92 species in his annotated list of ants. When revised in 1967, the resulting list included 85 species (7). The present list again includes 92 species of ants believed to occur in Indiana. Methods and Materials By comparing the names of ants on the 1967 list (7) with corresponding names in the 1979 Catalog (3), it was possible to make the necessary corrections. Although the 1967 checklist used Morris' order of names, the present paper lists the species of ants according to the 1979 Catalog (3). With each species name, the Catalog page number is given. During the summer of 1981, Schrock collected ants using pitfall traps placed in the same 20 stands of a stripmine study area that was previously used in 1964 to col- lect ants (6).
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Methods of Estimating Biodiversity from Presence-Absence Surveys
    130 Modern Methods of Estimating Biodiversity from Presence-Absence Surveys Robert M. Dorazio1, Nicholas J. Gotelli2 and Aaron M. Ellison3 1U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center, Gainesville, Florida 2University of Vermont, Department of Biology, Burlington, Vermont 3Harvard University, Harvard Forest, Petersham, Massachusetts USA 1. Introduction Communities of species are often sampled using so-called “presence-absence” surveys, wherein the apparent presence or absence of each species is recorded. Whereas counts of individuals can be used to estimate species abundances, apparent presence-absence data are often easier to obtain in surveys of multiple species. Presence-absence surveys also may be more accurate than abundance surveys, particularly in communities that contain highly mobile species. A problem with presence-absence data is that observations are usually contaminated by zeros that stem from errors in detection of a species. That is, true zeros, which are associated with the absence of a species, cannot be distinguished from false zeros, which occur when species are present in the vicinity of sampling but not detected. Therefore, it is more accurate to describe apparent presence-absence data as detections and non-detections, but this terminology is seldom used in ecology. Estimates of biodiversity and other community-level attributes can be dramatically affected by errors in detection of each species, particularly since the magnitude of these detection errors generally varies among species (Boulinier et al. 1998). For example, bias in estimates of biodiversity arising from errors in detection is especially pronounced in communities that contain a preponderance of rare or difficult-to-detect species. To eliminate this source of bias, probabilities of species occurrence and detection must be estimated simultaneously using a statistical model of the presence-absence data.
    [Show full text]
  • The Big Thicket Region of Texas Is a Southerly Tilted Topographical Basin Bounded Between the Trinity and Sabine Rivers in Southeast Texas (Watson 2006)
    Preliminary Survey of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and Grasshoppers (Orthoptera: Acrididae) of the Big Thicket Region of Texas. JoVonn G. Hill The Big Thicket region of Texas is a southerly tilted topographical basin bounded between the Trinity and Sabine rivers in southeast Texas (Watson 2006). (Figure 1). Big Thicket has been called " the biological crossroads of North America" as species from the east and west occur relatively near each other within a mosaic of habitats such as arid sandylands, bottomland hardwood forests and cypress sloughs, palmetto hardwood flats, wetland pine savannah, upland pine forests, and mixed grass prairies (NPS 2010). Over 1,189 species of plants, 185 species of birds, and 50 reptile species have been documented within the Big Thicket. Since the 1930's the Thicket has had a very active army of citizen scientists who have fought for the conservation of the regions biota. In 1974, all their efforts paid off when the Big Thicket National Preserve was established (It was also the first national preserve in U. S. history). The preserve consists of over 100,000 acres in 15 units spread out across seven counties. Additionally, the Nature Conservancy, the state of Texas, and several other entities have preserves established throughout the region. In 2006, an All Taxa Biodiversity Inventory (ATBI) began in the Thicket to document every living species within the region. As part of the ATBI, surveys of ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and grasshoppers began in 2011, and should continue for at least another year. Among insects, ants are typically the most dominant and influential force in terrestrial ecosystems, often comprise a large amount of the animal biomass, are very sensitive to habitat changes making them ideal choices for such baseline inventories such as the ATBI.
    [Show full text]