Update on the Pathomechanism, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Update on the Pathomechanism, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options for Rheumatoid Arthritis cells Review Update on the Pathomechanism, Diagnosis, and Treatment Options for Rheumatoid Arthritis 1 2, 1, , Yen-Ju Lin , Martina Anzaghe y and Stefan Schülke * y 1 Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Vice President’s Research Group 1: Molecular Allergology, 63225 Langen (Hesse), Germany; [email protected] 2 Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Product Testing of Immunological Biomedicines, 63225 Langen (Hesse), Germany; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-6103-775209 These authors have contributed equally to this manuscript. y Received: 23 January 2020; Accepted: 30 March 2020; Published: 3 April 2020 Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease that involves multiple joints bilaterally. It is characterized by an inflammation of the tendon (tenosynovitis) resulting in both cartilage destruction and bone erosion. While until the 1990s RA frequently resulted in disability, inability to work, and increased mortality, newer treatment options have made RA a manageable disease. Here, great progress has been made in the development of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) which target inflammation and thereby prevent further joint damage. The available DMARDs are subdivided into (1) conventional synthetic DMARDs (methotrexate, hydrochloroquine, and sulfadiazine), (2) targeted synthetic DMARDs (pan-JAK- and JAK1/2-inhibitors), and (3) biologic DMARDs (tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors, TNF-receptor (R) inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, IL-6R inhibitors, B cell depleting antibodies, and inhibitors of co-stimulatory molecules). While DMARDs have repeatedly demonstrated the potential to greatly improve disease symptoms and prevent disease progression in RA patients, they are associated with considerable side-effects and high financial costs. This review summarizes our current understanding of the underlying pathomechanism, diagnosis of RA, as well as the mode of action, clinical benefits, and side-effects of the currently available DMARDs. Keywords: rheumatoid arthritis; autoimmunity; TNF; IL-6 1. Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting the joints. It is characterized by a progressive symmetric inflammation of affected joints resulting in cartilage destruction, bone erosion, and disability [1]. While initially only a few joints are affected, in later stages many joints are affected and extraarticular symptoms are common (see below) [2]. With a prevalence ranging from 0.4% to 1.3% of the population depending on both sex (women are affected two to three times more often than men), age (frequency of new RA diagnoses peaks in the sixth decade of life), and studied patient collective (RA frequency increases from south to north and is higher in urban than rural areas) [1–5], RA is one of the most prevalent chronic inflammatory diseases [1]. Clinically, the symptoms of RA significantly differ between early stage RA and insufficiently treated later stages of the disease. Early stage RA is characterized by generalized disease symptoms such as fatigue, flu-like feeling, swollen and tender joints, and morning stiffness; and is paralleled by elevated levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) and an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) [6]. In contrast, insufficiently treated RA displays a complex clinical picture with the occurrence of serious systemic manifestations such as pleural effusions, lung nodules and interstitial lung Cells 2020, 9, 880; doi:10.3390/cells9040880 www.mdpi.com/journal/cells Cells 2020, 9, 880 2 of 43 disease, lymphomas, vasculitis in small or medium-sized arteries, keratoconjunctivitis, atherosclerosis, hematologic abnormalities (e.g., anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, or thrombocytosis), joint malalignment, loss of range of motion, bone erosion, cartilage destruction, and rheumatic nodules (in detail reviewed in [1,2,7]). Taken together, these systemic manifestations caused by the chronic inflammatory state in RA patients result in an increased mortality. 2. Development of Rheumatoid Arthritis While the cause of RA is unknown, both genetic and environmental factors were shown to contribute to RA development [8] (Figure1). As it is hypothesized for other autoimmune diseases, it is likely that the initial establishment of RA requires two separate events: (1) genetic predisposition of the respective patient resulting in the generation of autoreactive T and B cells, and (2) a triggering event, such as viral and bacterial infections or tissue injury, providing the activated Antigen-presenting cells (APCs) to activate the previously generated autoreactive lymphocytes, resulting in disrupted tolerance and subsequent tissue/organ destruction. Therefore, RA likely develops in genetically predisposed individuals due to a combination of genetic variation, epigenetic modification, and environmental factors initiated by a stochastic event (e.g., injury or infection) [1]. Risk factors for the development of RA were reported to include smoking, obesity, exposition to UV-light, sex hormones, drugs, changes in microbiome of the gut, mouth, and lung, periodontal disease (periodontitis), and infections [1,2,5,7,9,10]. Among these factors, the link between periodontal diseases and RA development is especially interesting. While the association between periodontitis and RA development was recognized as early as the 19th century [11], recent studies have demonstrated that infections with the common periodontal bacterium Porphyromonas gingivalis can result in the induction of autoimmune responses via the citrullination of host peptides [2,9]. During this process, which is catalyzed by the enzyme protein arginine deiminase (PAD), positively charged arginine residues of “self” proteins are converted into neutral citrulline residues, resulting in a net loss of surface charge, an increased susceptibility of the citrullinated “self” proteins to protein degradation, and the generation of neoepitopes [2,9]. This breach of local tolerance by P. gingivalis expressing PADi4 (facilitating the conversion of arginine to citrulline) promotes autoimmune responses as well as the downstream generation of anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPAs) [12]. In addition, other viral (Epstein–Barr virus) and bacterial infections (Proteus mirablis, Escherichia coli) were suggested to trigger the development of RA by mechanisms of molecular mimicry caused by similarities between amino acid sequences of “self” antigens and certain bacterial- or viral proteins [1,7,13–15]. Besides citrullination, carbamylation of lysine residues also contributes to the generation of neoepitopes from several “self” proteins (e.g., collagen, fibrinogen, or vimentin) and the subsequent breaking of immunological “self” tolerance [7,16]. Since both a family history of RA increases the risk to develop RA three to five times and concordance risk rates in identical twins are increased compared to both non-related control collectives and non-identical twins, we have to assume that genetic factors also contribute to RA development [1,17]. Genome wide association studies using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have suggested more than 100 loci to be associated with RA development [1,18]. As expected, many of these loci are involved in the induction, regulation, and maintenance of immune responses and are shared with other chronic inflammatory diseases. Some of the RA risk factors are the presence of certain HLA alleles [19], alterations in co-stimulatory pathways (e.g., via changes in CD28 or CD40 expression) [20], as well as changes in innate immune cell activation [21], lymphocyte activation thresholds (e.g., PTPN22) [22], or cytokine signaling [1]. Among the genes contributing to RA development, HLA-DRB1 alleles (DRB1*01 and DRB1*04; DQ8) account for approximately 50% of the observed genetic susceptibility [2,23,24]. Studies have suggested that these HLA alleles, which share amino acid sequences within their peptide binding grooves, are able to preferentially present certain Cells 2020, 9, 880 3 of 43 Cells 2019, 8, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 42 peptideHLA-DRB1 epitopes alleles derived are associated from relevant with RAmore autoantigens aggressive [ 1bone,25]. erosion In addition, and someincreased of these mortality HLA-DRB1 rates alleles[26]. are associated with more aggressive bone erosion and increased mortality rates [26]. TakenTaken together, together, these these findings findings suggest suggest a stronga strong T cell-dependent T cell-dependent component component in RA in andRA and indeed indeed Th1 andTh1 Th17and Th17 T cell T subsets cell subsets are the are predominant the predominant cell types cell types found found in the in inflamed the inflamed synovial synovial tissue tissue (see also(see belowalso below “pathomechanism “pathomechanism of RA”) of RA”) [2,27 ].[2,27]. FigureFigure 1.1.Factors Factors contributing contributing to rheumatoid to rheumato arthritisid arthritis (RA) development. (RA) development. Both environmental Both environmental (smoking, obesity,(smoking, as obesity, well as infectionsas well as infections with certain with pathogens certain pathogens such as Porphyromonas such as Porphyromonas gingivialis gingivialis) and genetic) and factorsgenetic (epigenetic factors (epigenetic modifications, modifi geneticcations, polymorphisms genetic polymorphisms influencing influencing antigen presentation antigen presentation (e.g., the HLA(e.g., genesthe HLA HLA-DRB1*01 genes HLA-DRB1*01/04),/04), T- and B cell T- function, and B ce cytokinell function, production,
Recommended publications
  • Presentation
    Strategies to support the COVID-19 response in LMICs A virtual seminar series Therapeutics Landscape for COVID-19 Natasha Mubeen Chida, MD MSPH Associate Program Director, Infectious Disease Fellowship Program Assistant Professor, Division of Infectious Diseases Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Objectives • Review biological plausibility of Remdesivir for SARS-CoV-2 treatment • Review clinical data on Remdesivir • Review biological plausibility of Hydroxychloroquine for SARS-CoV-2 treatment • Review clinical data on Hydroxychloroquine • Discuss cytokine release syndrome in COVID-19 • Discuss use of anti IL-6 blockade for management of CRS • State ongoing clinical trials for Remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine, IL-6 blockade Sample of COVID-19 Therapeutic Landscape Antivirals Immune Modulators Other Baloxavir Anakinra ACEI/ARB Chloroquine/Hydroxychloroquine Convalescent Plasma Ascorbic Acid DAS-181 Corticosteroids Azithromycin Favipiravir IVIG Epoprostenol Interferon Lenzilumab Indomethacin Lopinavir/Ritonavir Ruxolitinib Ivermectin Neuraminidase inhibitors Sarilumab Niclosamide Remdesivir Sirolimus Nitazoxanide Ribavarin Tocilizumab Statins Umifenovir Acalabrutinib SARS-CoV-2 Liu C, et al. ACS Cent Sci. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.0c00272 (2020). Jiang S, Hillyer C, Du L. Trends Immunol doi: 10.1016/j.it.2020.03.007 (2020). “Antivirals” Remdesivir • 2013 Ebola outbreak • CDC/USAMRIDD/Gilead Sciences identified nucleoside lead à prodrug, RDV • Metabolized to active form, adenosine nucleoside analog • Interferes with RNA polymerase • Evades
    [Show full text]
  • Fig. L COMPOSITIONS and METHODS to INHIBIT STEM CELL and PROGENITOR CELL BINDING to LYMPHOID TISSUE and for REGENERATING GERMINAL CENTERS in LYMPHATIC TISSUES
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date Χ 23 February 2012 (23.02.2012) WO 2U12/U24519ft ft A2 (51) International Patent Classification: AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BR, BW, BY, BZ, A61K 31/00 (2006.01) CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, (21) International Application Number: HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, PCT/US201 1/048297 KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LY, MA, MD, (22) International Filing Date: ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, 18 August 201 1 (18.08.201 1) NO, NZ, OM, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, (25) Filing Language: English TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, (26) Publication Language: English ZW. (30) Priority Data: (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 61/374,943 18 August 2010 (18.08.2010) US kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, 61/441,485 10 February 201 1 (10.02.201 1) US GM, KE, LR, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, 61/449,372 4 March 201 1 (04.03.201 1) US ZM, ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European (AL, AT, BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, (72) Inventor; and EE, ES, FI, FR, GB, GR, HR, HU, IE, IS, ΓΓ, LT, LU, (71) Applicant : DEISHER, Theresa [US/US]; 1420 Fifth LV, MC, MK, MT, NL, NO, PL, PT, RO, RS, SE, SI, SK, Avenue, Seattle, WA 98101 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • A Factor That Should Raise Awareness in the Practice of Pediatric Medicine: West Nile Virus
    Case Report / Olgu Sunumu DOI: 10.5578/ced.201813 • J Pediatr Inf 2018; 12(2): e70-e72 A Factor That Should Raise Awareness in the Practice of Pediatric Medicine: West Nile Virus Çocuk Hekimliği Pratiğinde Farkındalığın Artması Gereken Bir Etken; Batı Nil Virüsü Duygu Uç1, Tamer Çelik1, Derya Gönen1, Asena Sucu1, Can Celiloğlu1, Orkun Tolunay1, Ümit Çelik1 1 Clinics of Pediatrics, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey Abstract Özet West Nile virus is an RNA virus found in Flaviviridae family and its vector Batı Nil virüsü Flaviviridae ailesinde yer alan bir RNA virüsü olup, vektörü is of Culex-type mosquitoes and the population of these flies soar dra- Culex türü sivrisineklerdir. Culex türü sineklerin popülasyonu Ağustos matically in August. Most of the infected people who have mild viremia ayında pik yapmaktadır. Ilımlı viremiye sahip enfekte bireylerin çoğu experience this disease asymptomatically or encounter situations simi- hastalığı asemptomatik geçirmekte ya da diğer viral enfeksiyonlara ben- lar to other viral infections. Patients suffer from fatigue, fever, and head- zeyen tablolarla karşımıza gelmektedir. Hastalarda sıklıkla halsizlik, ateş, ache, pain in the eyes, myalgia, diarrhea, vomiting, arthralgia, rash and baş ağrısı, gözlerde ağrı, miyalji, ishal, kusma, artralji, döküntü ve lenfa- lymphadenopathy. Similar to many diseases transmitted through mos- denopati görülebilmektedir. Sivrisinekler aracılığı ile bulaşan birçok has- quitoes, the West Nile virus should also be considered as a problem of talık
    [Show full text]
  • Predictive QSAR Tools to Aid in Early Process Development of Monoclonal Antibodies
    Predictive QSAR tools to aid in early process development of monoclonal antibodies John Micael Andreas Karlberg Published work submitted to Newcastle University for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Engineering November 2019 Abstract Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) have become one of the fastest growing markets for diagnostic and therapeutic treatments over the last 30 years with a global sales revenue around $89 billion reported in 2017. A popular framework widely used in pharmaceutical industries for designing manufacturing processes for mAbs is Quality by Design (QbD) due to providing a structured and systematic approach in investigation and screening process parameters that might influence the product quality. However, due to the large number of product quality attributes (CQAs) and process parameters that exist in an mAb process platform, extensive investigation is needed to characterise their impact on the product quality which makes the process development costly and time consuming. There is thus an urgent need for methods and tools that can be used for early risk-based selection of critical product properties and process factors to reduce the number of potential factors that have to be investigated, thereby aiding in speeding up the process development and reduce costs. In this study, a framework for predictive model development based on Quantitative Structure- Activity Relationship (QSAR) modelling was developed to link structural features and properties of mAbs to Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography (HIC) retention times and expressed mAb yield from HEK cells. Model development was based on a structured approach for incremental model refinement and evaluation that aided in increasing model performance until becoming acceptable in accordance to the OECD guidelines for QSAR models.
    [Show full text]
  • Therapeutic and Prophylactic Use of Oral, Low-Dose Ifns in Species of Veterinary Interest: Back to the Future
    veterinary sciences Review Therapeutic and Prophylactic Use of Oral, Low-Dose IFNs in Species of Veterinary Interest: Back to the Future Sara Frazzini 1 , Federica Riva 2,* and Massimo Amadori 3 1 Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy; [email protected] 2 Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Università degli Studi di Milano, 26900 Lodi, Italy 3 Rete Nazionale di Immunologia Veterinaria, 25125 Brescia, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-0250334519 Abstract: Cytokines are important molecules that orchestrate the immune response. Given their role, cytokines have been explored as drugs in immunotherapy in the fight against different pathological conditions such as bacterial and viral infections, autoimmune diseases, transplantation and cancer. One of the problems related to their administration consists in the definition of the correct dose to avoid severe side effects. In the 70s and 80s different studies demonstrated the efficacy of cytokines in veterinary medicine, but soon the investigations were abandoned in favor of more profitable drugs such as antibiotics. Recently, the World Health Organization has deeply discouraged the use of antibiotics in order to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant microorganisms. In this respect, the use of cytokines to prevent or ameliorate infectious diseases has been highlighted, and several studies show the potential of their use in therapy and prophylaxis also in the veterinary field. In this review we aim to review the principles of cytokine treatments, mainly IFNs, and to update the experiences encountered in animals. Keywords: veterinary immunotherapy; cytokines; IFN; low dose treatment; oral treatment Citation: Frazzini, S.; Riva, F.; Amadori, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Afelimomab (Rinn) Ic Medicines Under the Following Names: Adonis V
    2248 Supplementary Drugs and Other Substances Adiphenine Hydrochloride (USAN, rINNM) Adrenalone Hydrochloride (pINNM) ⊗ Uses. The use of aesculus has been reviewed;1,2 although there is some evidence suggesting benefit in chronic venous insuffi- Adiphénine, Chlorhydrate d’; Adiphenini Hydrochloridum; Adrénalone, Chlorhydrate d’; Adrenaloni Hydrochloridum; ciency, more rigorous studies are needed.2 Cloridrato de Adifenina; Hidrocloruro de adifenina; NSC- Adrenalonu chlorowodorek; Hidrocloruro de adrenalona. 1. Sirtori CR. Aescin: pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and thera- 129224; Spasmolytine. Адреналона Гидрохлорид peutic profile. Pharmacol Res 2001; 44: 183–93. Адифенина Гидрохлорид C H NO ,HCl = 217.6. 2. Pittler MH, Ernst E. Horse chestnut seed extract for chronic ve- 9 11 3 nous insufficiency. Available in The Cochrane Database of Sys- C20H25NO2,HCl = 347.9. CAS — 62-13-5. tematic Reviews; Issue 1. Chichester: John Wiley; 2006 (ac- CAS — 50-42-0. ATC — A01AD06; B02BC05. cessed 31/03/06). ATC Vet — QA01AD06; QB02BC05. Profile Preparations Adiphenine and adiphenine hydrochloride have been used as Profile Proprietary Preparations (details are given in Part 3) antispasmodics. Adrenalone hydrochloride is used as a local haemostatic and va- Arg.: Grafic Retard; Herbaccion Venotonico; Nadem; Venastat; Venostasin; soconstrictor. It has also been used with adrenaline in eye drops Austria: Aesculaforce; Provenen; Reparil; Venosin; Venostasin; Belg.: Preparations for glaucoma. Reparil; Veinofytol; Venoplant; Braz.: Phytovein; Reparil; Varilise;
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Antibody Properties and Clinically Relevant Immunogenicity
    Drug Safety https://doi.org/10.1007/s40264-018-00788-w ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluation of Antibody Properties and Clinically Relevant Immunogenicity, Anaphylaxis, and Hypersensitivity Reactions in Two Phase III Trials of Tralokinumab in Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma Mats Carlsson1 · Martin Braddock2 · Yuling Li3 · Jihong Wang3 · Weichen Xu3 · Nicholas White4 · Ayman Megally5 · Gillian Hunter6 · Gene Colice5 © The Author(s) 2019 Abstract Introduction Tralokinumab is a monoclonal antibody (mAb) that neutralizes interleukin (IL)-13, a cytokine involved in the pathogenesis of asthma. Objective The objectives of this study were to characterize the potential immunogenic properties of tralokinumab and report data for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) and hypersensitivity reactions from two phase III clinical trials. Methods The oligosaccharide structure of tralokinumab, Fab-arm exchange, and ADAs were characterized by standard techniques. Hypersensitivity adverse events (AEs) were evaluated in two pivotal clinical trials of tralokinumab in severe, uncontrolled asthma: STRATOS 1 and 2 (NCT02161757 and NCT02194699). Results No galactose-α-1,3-galactose (α-Gal) epitopes were found in the Fab region of tralokinumab and only 4.5% of glycoforms contained α-Gal in the Fc region. Under non-reducing conditions, Fab-arm exchange did not take place with another immunoglobulin (Ig) G­ 4 mAb (mavrilimumab). However, following glutathione reduction, a hybrid antibody with monovalent bioactivity was detected. ADA incidences (titers) were as follows: STRATOS 1—every 2 weeks (Q2 W) 0.8% (26.0), every 4 weeks (Q4 W) 0.5% (26.0), placebo 0.8% (52.0); STRATOS 2—Q2 W 1.2% (39.0), placebo 0.8% (13.0). Participant-reported hypersensitivity AE rates were as follows: STRATOS 1—Q2 W 25.9%, Q4 W 25.0%, placebo 25.5%; STRATOS 2—Q2 W 13.2%, placebo 9.0%.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder
    © Copyright 2012 Oregon State University. All Rights Reserved Drug Use Research & Management Program Oregon State University, 500 Summer Street NE, E35 Salem, Oregon 97301-1079 Phone 503-947-5220 | Fax 503-947-2596 Drug Class Review with New Drug Evaluation: Biologics for Autoimmune Disorders-Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Date of Review: April 2021 Date of Last Review: n/a Dates of Literature Search: 1/1/1996 – 1/20/2021 Generic Name: Brand Name (Manufacturer): Eculizumab Soliris® (Alexion Pharmaceuticals) Inebilizumab-cdon Uplizna™ (Viela Bio) Satralizumab-mwge Enspryng™ (Genentech/Roche) Dossiers Received: Yes Current Status of PDL Class: See Appendix 1. Purpose for Class Update: To define place in therapy for 3 immunosuppressive agents, eculizumab, inebilizumab-cdon, and satralizumab-mwge, recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment adults with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Research Questions: 1. What is the effectiveness of eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab in reducing time to relapse in adult patients with NMOSD who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive? 2. What are the harms of eculizumab, inebilizumab-cdon and satralizumab in adults with NMOSD? 3. Is there comparative evidence that eculizumab, inebilizumab, and satralizumab differ in efficacy or harms for management of NMOSD? 4. Are there certain sub-populations (based on age, gender, ethnicity, comorbidities, disease duration or severity) in which eculizumab, inebilizumab, or satralizumab may be beneficial
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromyelitis Optica News
    Neuromyelitis Optica News Gloria von Geldern, MD Assistant Professor of Neurology University of Washington Multiple Sclerosis Center Multiple Sclerosis Regional Summit June 13, 2020 Disclosures ▪ No conflict of interest ▪ Off-label treatments will be mentioned Current research funding Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) What is New in NMO? Natalia Rost, MD Chair scientific committee AAN Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disease (NMOSD) ▪ Inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system ▪ Predominantly involving optic nerves and spinal cord ▪ Severe demyelination and axonal damage ▪ Rare disease: 0.5-10/100,000, ~8,000 patients in the US ▪ Black > Asian > White ▪ Female > Male Flanagan et al., 2016 Bukhari et al. 2017 Hor et al. 2018 (Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation) Multiple Sclerosis vs NMO Pittock and Lucchinetti 2016 History 1894: Clinical case descriptions 2004: AQP4 antibody identified by Devic and Gault by Lennon, Weinshenker et al. Eugene Devic (1858–1930) Lancet2004; 364: 2106–12; Journal of Neuroinflammation 2013, 10:8 Diagnostic Criteria Wingerchuk et al. 2015 Myelin Oligodendrocyte (MOG) Antibody ▪ More common in men and whites ▪ Bilateral optic neuritis, caudal myelitis ▪ Better recovery compared to AQP4-Ab pos NMO ▪ MRI brain without NMO findings ▪ Assay now commercially available at Mayo Sato et al. 2014; van Pelt et al. 2016 Auto-Antibody to Aquaporin 4 Water channel protein in ▪ Astrocytic foot processes at the blood-brain barrier ▪ Spinal cord grey matter ▪ Periaqueductal and periventricular regions ▪ Mueller cells in the retina Amiry-Moghaddam and Otterson 2003 Bystander Oligodendrocyte Injury Tradtrantip et al 2017 Pathology Extensive demyelination Perivascular & parenchymal Complement activation Axonal injury, necrosis eosinophils & granulocytes rosette and rim pattern Jacob et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborations on Imaging – the Medimmune’S Innovative Way
    Collaborations on Imaging – The Medimmune’s Innovative Way Jerry Wu, PhD, Medimmune Developments in Healthcare Imaging – Connecting with Industry 18th October 2017 Contents 1 A brief overview of Medimmune 2 Scientific collaborations 3 Scientific Interest Group for Imaging 2 A brief overview of Medimmune Global Biologics Research and Development Arm of ~2,200 Employees in the US and UK Robust pipeline of 120+ Biologics in Research & Development with 40+ projects in Clinical Stage Development California Gaithersburg Cambridge 3 Medimmune – Biologics arm of AstraZeneca Late-stage Discovery and Early Development Development Innovative Medicines and Early Development Unit (Small Molecules) Global Internal and Collaboration and Medicines external combinations Development Market opportunities MedImmune (Biologics) 4 Current therapeutic areas Respiratory, Inflammation and Cardiovascular and Infectious Disease Oncology Autoimmunity Metabolic Disease Neuroscience Main Therapeutic Areas Opportunity-driven Protein Biologics Small Molecules Immuno-therapies Devices Engineering 5 RESPIRATORY, INFLAMMATION AND AUTOIMMUNITY ONCOLOGY (RIA) Medimmune R&D pipeline INFECTIOUS DISEASE (ID), NEUROSIENCE AND CARDIOVASCULAR AND METABOLIC DISEASE (CVMD) GASTROINTESINAL DISEASE PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 2 PIVOTAL/PHASE 3 Durvalumab + MEDI-573 Durvalumab MEDI-565 MEDI0562 MEDI4276 Durvalumab MEDI0680 Metastatic ≥2nd Line Advanced Solid Tumors Solid Tumors Solid Tumors Stage III NSCLC Solid Tumors Breast Cancer Bladder Cancer Durvalumab/AZD5069/ Durvalmab + MEDI0680
    [Show full text]
  • Study Protocol
    2016N278580_02 CONFIDENTIAL GlaxoSmithKline group of companies 201789 TITLE PAGE Division: Worldwide Development Information Type: Protocol Amendment Title: A Phase 1/2, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Pharmacokinetics, Safety and Tolerability of GSK3196165 in Combination with Methotrexate Therapy, in Japanese Subjects with Active Moderate-Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Despite Treatment with Methotrexate. Compound Number: GSK3196165 Development Phase I/II Effective Date: 19- MAY-2017 Protocol Amendment Number: 02 Author(s): PPD Revision Chronology: GlaxoSmithKline Date Version Document Number 2016N278580_00 17-AUG-2016 Original 2016N278580_01 26-SEP-2016 Amendment Number 01 Revision contents: This amendment addresses PMDA modifications requested during the clinical trial notification process. It includes an additional Inclusion Criterion for FVC in Section 5.1; additional Exclusion Criterion and Stopping Criterion for HBV-DNA for subjects with positive anti-HBs antibody in Section 5.2 and Section 5.4; addition of a preventive dose of co-trimoxazole in Section 4.6.1 and Section 6.10.2.2; addition of HBV-DNA test at Screening and addition of footnote for clarification in Section 7.1; addition of “past week’s pain” in Section 12.6.2.1; correction of analysis populations in Section 9.3.1; and deletion of unapproved contraception methods in Japan in Section 12.2. 2016N278580_02 19-MAY-2017 Amendment Number 02 Revision contents: Change of Inclusion Criterion for CRP in Section 5.1. Copyright 2017 the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying or use of this information is prohibited. 1 2016N278580_02 CONFIDENTIAL 201789 SPONSOR SIGNATORY: Kihito Takahashi Date Vice President, Head of Development and Medical Affairs Division, GlaxoSmithKline K.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification Decisions Taken by the Harmonized System Committee from the 47Th to 60Th Sessions (2011
    CLASSIFICATION DECISIONS TAKEN BY THE HARMONIZED SYSTEM COMMITTEE FROM THE 47TH TO 60TH SESSIONS (2011 - 2018) WORLD CUSTOMS ORGANIZATION Rue du Marché 30 B-1210 Brussels Belgium November 2011 Copyright © 2011 World Customs Organization. All rights reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning translation, reproduction and adaptation rights should be addressed to [email protected]. D/2011/0448/25 The following list contains the classification decisions (other than those subject to a reservation) taken by the Harmonized System Committee ( 47th Session – March 2011) on specific products, together with their related Harmonized System code numbers and, in certain cases, the classification rationale. Advice Parties seeking to import or export merchandise covered by a decision are advised to verify the implementation of the decision by the importing or exporting country, as the case may be. HS codes Classification No Product description Classification considered rationale 1. Preparation, in the form of a powder, consisting of 92 % sugar, 6 % 2106.90 GRIs 1 and 6 black currant powder, anticaking agent, citric acid and black currant flavouring, put up for retail sale in 32-gram sachets, intended to be consumed as a beverage after mixing with hot water. 2. Vanutide cridificar (INN List 100). 3002.20 3. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29 (See “INN List 101” at the end of this publication.) and 30 4. Certain INN products. Chapters 13, 29 (See “INN List 102” at the end of this publication.) and 30 5. Certain INN products. Chapters 28, 29, (See “INN List 103” at the end of this publication.) 30, 35 and 39 6. Re-classification of INN products.
    [Show full text]