DOCSLIB.ORG

Water System Master Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Water System Master Plan Water System Master Plan Prepared for: Town of Framingham, MA Prepared by: Stantec Consulting Services Inc., Burlington, MA December 2017 WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN Table of Contents 1.0 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................... 1.1 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 1.1 1.2 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................. 1.2 2.0 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ....................................................................................... 2.1 2.1 WATER SYSTEM HISTORY ................................................................................................... 2.3 2.2 DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM........................................................................................................ 2.3 2.3 PRESSURE ZONE ................................................................................................................. 2.7 2.3.1 Town Zone ....................................................................................................... 2.8 2.3.2 Beebe Zone (Northwest High Service) ....................................................... 2.8 2.3.3 Goodnow Zone (Southwest High Service) ................................................ 2.8 2.3.4 Doeskin Hill Service Area............................................................................... 2.8 2.3.5 William J. Heights Boosted Zone .................................................................. 2.8 2.4 WATER SUPPLY SOURCE ................................................................................................... 2.8 2.5 PUMPING STATIONS .......................................................................................................... 2.9 2.5.1 Edgell Road Pump Station ........................................................................... 2.9 2.5.2 Pleasant Street Pump Station ...................................................................... 2.9 2.5.3 Elm Street Pump Station ................................................................................ 2.9 2.5.4 Grove Street Pump Station ......................................................................... 2.11 2.5.5 Goodnow Lane Booster Station ................................................................ 2.11 2.5.6 Doeskin Hill Booster Station ......................................................................... 2.11 2.5.7 William J. Heights Booster Station .............................................................. 2.11 2.6 EMERGENCY CONNECTIONS ........................................................................................ 2.12 2.7 PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE ......................................................................................... 2.14 2.8 STORAGE .......................................................................................................................... 2.14 2.8.1 Beebe Tank (0.3 MG) .................................................................................. 2.15 2.8.2 Beebe Tank (1 MG) ..................................................................................... 2.15 2.8.3 Indian Head Tank ......................................................................................... 2.15 2.8.4 Merriam Hill Tank .......................................................................................... 2.15 2.8.5 Goodnow Elevated Tank ........................................................................... 2.16 2.8.6 Doeskin Hill Tank ........................................................................................... 2.17 3.0 WATER REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................. 3.1 3.1 HISTORICAL POPULATION ................................................................................................ 3.1 3.2 POPULATION PROJECTIONS ............................................................................................ 3.2 3.2.1 Potential Growth Areas ................................................................................. 3.3 3.2.2 Summary .......................................................................................................... 3.2 3.3 WATER CONSUMPTION .................................................................................................... 3.4 3.3.1 Residential Water Consumption .................................................................. 3.4 3.3.2 Non-Residential Water Consumption ......................................................... 3.5 3.3.3 Unaccounted-for-Water ............................................................................... 3.5 3.4 WATER REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................................................... 3.6 3.4.1 Average Day Demand ................................................................................. 3.6 i WATER SYSTEM MASTER PLAN 3.4.2 Maximum Daily Demand.............................................................................. 3.7 3.4.3 Peak Hour Demand ....................................................................................... 3.8 4.0 FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS AND FIELD TESTING ........................................................... 4.1 4.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 4.1 4.2 FIRE FLOW REQUIREMENTS ............................................................................................... 4.1 4.4 FIRE HYDRANT FLOW TESTS .............................................................................................. 4.3 5.0 HYDRAULIC MODEL ...................................................................................................... 5.1 5.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 5.1 5.2 REVIEW OF EXISTING WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL .......................................... 5.1 5.3 WATER SYSTEM PIPE NETWORK UPDATES ....................................................................... 5.1 5.4 WATER SYSTEM HYDRAULIC MODEL UPDATES .............................................................. 5.2 5.4.1 Water Demand Allocation ........................................................................... 5.2 5.4.2 Node Elevations ............................................................................................. 5.2 5.4.3 C-Value Assignment ...................................................................................... 5.2 5.5 CALIBRATION OF THE HYDRAULIC MODEL .................................................................... 5.3 6.0 ADEQUACY OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ........................................................................ 6.1 6.1 GENERAL ............................................................................................................................ 6.1 6.2 PRESSURE REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................ 6.1 6.3 ADEQUACY OF DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM ........................................................................... 6.1 6.3.1 Peak Hour Demand Condition .................................................................... 6.1 6.3.2 Fire Flow Conditions ....................................................................................... 6.3 6.3.3 Growth Areas .................................................................................................. 6.5 7.0 WATER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................... 7.1 7.1 UNLINED WATER MAINS ................................................................................................... 7.1 7.2 TRANSMISSION MAINS ...................................................................................................... 7.2 7.3 PARALLEL MAINS TO BE ABANDONED ........................................................................... 7.2 7.4 AREAS OF FREQUENT WATER MAIN BREAKS ................................................................. 7.3 7.5 WATER MAIN OBSTRUCTIONS .......................................................................................... 7.5 8.0 DISTRIBUTION STORAGE ................................................................................................ 8.1 8.1 ADEQUACY OF DISTRIBUTION STORAGE ....................................................................... 8.2 8.1.1 Equalizing Storage ......................................................................................... 8.2 8.1.2 Fire Flow Storage ............................................................................................ 8.2 8.1.3 Total Storage Requirements ......................................................................... 8.3 8.1.4 Useable Storage ............................................................................................. 8.3 9.0 EVALUATION OF PUMPING FACILITIES ........................................................................ 9.1 9.1 PUMP STATION INSPECTIONS ........................................................................................... 9.1 9.1.1 Edgell Road Pump Station ........................................................................... 9.1 9.1.2 Pleasant Street Pump Station ...................................................................... 9.2 9.1.3 Elm Street
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jolda Joins First BOS Race
    Vote For LORETTA SCOTT WALKER For Selectman Experience Accountability “I would Vision appreciate your 10 Years Community Service vote on May 5th” to greater Webster Paid for by Loretta Scott Walker for selectman Mailed free to requesting homes in Webster, Dudley and the Oxfords 508-764-4325 PROUD MEDIA SPONSOR OF RELAY FOR LIFE OF THE GREATER SOUTHBRIDGE AREA! Complimentary to homes by request ONLINE: WWW.WEBSTERTIMES.NET Friday, May 2, 2014 THIS WEEK’S QUOTE THE GAMES GO ON Jolda joins “Nothing is particularly hard first BOS race if you divide it into small jobs.” WEBSTER LAKE, Henry Ford ZONING BYLAWS ON INSIDE AGENDA IF Seniors ................. A19 ELECTED Learning .............A5-8 Viewpoint ............. A10 BY JOY RICHARD Sports ..................A11-12 TIMES STAFF WRITER Obituaries ............B Sect WEBSTER — With the Andrew M. Jolda Events Calendar ...B Sect Board of Selectmen’s race Real Estate ...........B Sect coming down to the wire at the Webster Town Hall. Legal Notices ..... B Sect and six candidates ready for Longtime selectman and Joy Richard photos residents to hit the polls, one current Chairman Deborah Players on the Twins carried the first sign for the Oxford Little League during their parade. final newcomer, Andrew M. Keefe and Jeffrey Duggan Jolda, is making his case to will be leaving the board this LOCAL Little League players in Webster and Oxford got their respective seasons off to a wet voters. year with almost a decade of start last weekend, as each league held its Opening Day parade on Sunday, April 27. Jolda is vying for one of service between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan
    Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan Adopted: July 24, 2002 Framingham Historical Commission Laurie Evans-Daly, Chair Elizabeth Funk, Vice Chair Mary Murphy, Secretary Gerald Couto Waldo Lyon David Marks Robert Snider Stephen Herring, Town Historian Donna Jacobs, Framingham Department of Planning & Economic Development Table of Contents Page 1. Preamble 1.1 Historic Preservation Goals ........................................................................................5 1.2 History of Growth and Development in Framingham .............................................6 1.3 Profile of Framingham ................................................................................................8 2. Framingham's Preservation Planning Efforts 2.1 Municipal ....................................................................................................................14 2.2 Private Preservation Organizations .........................................................................20 2.3 Private Citizens Efforts .............................................................................................24 2.4 State .............................................................................................................................25 2.5 Federal ........................................................................................................................29 2.6 Action Recommendations ............................................................................. 29 3. The Cultural Resources Inventory 3.1 The Inventory
    [Show full text]
  • Full Case Studies
    Land Use Planning in the Doldrums: Case Studies of Growth Management in the I-495 Region by Christina Rosan and Lawrence Susskind With Ona Ferguson David Fairman Marina Psaros Research Assistance from Ye Ding Pankaj Kumar Jiawen Yang Prepared for the Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston by The MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning and The Consensus Building Institute February 2007 Please submit comments and suggestions to [email protected] Case Studies of Growth Management in the I-495 Region 1 Page intentionally left blank Case Studies of Growth Management in the I-495 Region 2 Executive Summary Between 1990 and 2000, communities along Route 495, greater Boston’s outer belt highway, grew about twice as a fast as the region as a whole. How have communities in this corridor responded to that growth and what role did planning and planners play in that response? To answer these questions, we examined eight representative localities in the region. We found that while all the communities generally face similar pressures and share similar concerns, they have responded to those pressures and concerns in quite different ways. Moreover, master planning turned out to be of limited use and professional planners in those communities generally took their cues from public officials and volunteer boards rather than following “best practices” in the planning field. As a result, local land use planning in Massachusetts is still far behind what occurs in many other parts of the United States. In all the localities, private entities are interested in building new residential and commercial developments, usually on previously undeveloped land.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Preservation Plan 2016
    Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan 2016 Framingham Historical Commission Framingham Historic District Commission Erika Oliver Jerram, Deputy Director, Community & Economic Development Jennifer B. Doherty, Historic Preservation Planner This page intentionally left blank Framingham Historical Commission Frederic A. Wallace, Chair Paul Silva, Vice-Chair Lewis Colten Gerald Couto, AIA Susan Kennedy Thomas Joseph Schuetz Jane B. Whiting Framingham Historic District Commission Gerald Couto, AIA, Chair Steve Greeley, Vice-Chair Susan Bernstein Julie Ferrari, ASLA Henry Field Amy Finstein, Ph.D. Ted Grenham Helen Lemoine James Kubat, AIA Andrew Mackin Ken Nowell Calvin Smith Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan Plan adopted July 12, 2017 This page intentionally left blank To Gerald Couto, AIA 1937—2017 This Historic Preservation Plan is dedicated to Gerald “Jerry” Couto, AIA. Jerry was an ardent supporter of historic preservation in Framingham for decades. He served on the Historical Commission, Historic District Commission, and as a Town Meeting member for many years. His breadth of knowledge in the fields of architectural history and historic preservation were a rich resource to the town. He was passionate about the importance of preserving Framingham’s history, and his voice will be sorely missed. Town of Framingham Historic Preservation Plan This page intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 9 2 A History of Growth and Development in Framingham 11 3 An Overview of Preservation Planning 39 4 Framingham’s
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Framingham Massachusetts
    TTOOWWNN OOFF FFRRAAMMIINNGGHHAAMM MMAASSSSAACCHHUUSSEETTTTSS Annual Report Year Ending December 31, 2007 Framingham’s Town Seal: In the year 1900, the Framingham Town Seal was redesigned for the Town’s bicentennial to recognize our community’s prominence in education and transportation. The Framingham State Normal School, a free public school and the first of its kind in America, is represented by the structure at the top of the design. Governor Danforth, the founder of Framingham and owner of much of its land, is acknowledged by the words “Danforth’s Farms 1662” on the shield at the center. The wheel on the shield with spokes drawn as tracks radiating in six different directions represents the steam and electric railroads and signifies the Town’s position as a transportation hub. Surrounding the words “Town of Framingham Incorporated 1700” is an illustrative border of straw braid, which honors the prominent role Framingham played in the manufacture of hats and bonnets in the 1800s. I TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION IV ORGANIZATIONAL CHART V ELECTED & APPOINTED OFFICIALS VI GENERAL GOVERNMENT 1 BOARD OF SELECTMEN 1 TOWN MANAGER 3 TOWN CLERK 4 ELECTION RESULTS 6 TOWN COUNSEL 8 HUMAN RESOURCES 33 VETERANS’ SERVICES 39 BUILDING SERVICES 41 MEDIA SERVICES 42 FINANCE 43 CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER 43 TOWN ACCOUNTANT 44 TREASURER/COLLECTOR 61 BOARD OF ASSESSORS 66 PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 69 RETIREMENT SYSTEM 70 PUBLIC SAFETY & HEALTH 71 POLICE DEPARTMENT 71 ANIMAL CONTROL 85 FRAMINGHAM AUXILIARY POLICE 87 FIRE DEPARTMENT 90 INSPECTIONAL SERVICES 104
    [Show full text]
  • Nber Working Paper Series Management Practices
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, RELATIONAL CONTRACTS, AND THE DECLINE OF GENERAL MOTORS Susan Helper Rebecca Henderson Working Paper 19867 http://www.nber.org/papers/w19867 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 January 2014 The authors would like to thank the editors of this journal for their comments and suggestions, and would also like to thank Robert Gibbons, Casey Ichniowski, Mari Sako, Jeff Liker, Michael Wasser, Paul Adler, Brad Markell, and Jeffrey Morrow. Susan Helper is Chief Economist at the Department of Commerce and AT&T Professor of Economics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. Rebecca Henderson is the John and Natty McArthur University Professor, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Funding for this paper came from the Harvard Business School Division of Research. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2014 by Susan Helper and Rebecca Henderson. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Management Practices, Relational Contracts, and the Decline of General Motors Susan Helper and Rebecca Henderson NBER Working Paper No. 19867 January 2014 JEL No. J24,L2,L21,L23 ABSTRACT General Motors was once regarded as one of the best managed and most successful firms in the world, but between 1980 and 2009 its share of the US market fell from 62.6 to 19.8 percent, and in 2009 the firm went bankrupt.
    [Show full text]
  • 0 Schedule Cover Page
    Motors Liquidation Company Attachment 17c Case Number: 09-50026 17c. Environmental Information - Administrative proceedings involving the Debtor Site Name & Address Name & Address of Government Unit Environmental Law Referenced 59 LINDEN ROAD LANDFILL, 1200 SOUTH MDEQ WASTE AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AGREEMENT FOR A LIMITED LINDEN ROAD, FLINT, MI DIVISION, 525 WEST ALLEGAN STREET, P.O. BOX RECREATIONAL REMEDY, LANDUSE-ERD- 30473, LANSING, MI 48909-7973 98-011, DATED 6/16/99 ALLISON EAGLE CREEK TECHNOLOGY MR. DANIEL PATULSKI, U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL VOLUNTARY CORRECTIVE ACTION CENTER AKA ROLLS-ROYCE PROTECTION AGENCY, OFFICE OF RCRA – AGREEMENT BETWEEN GM AND U.S. EPA, CORPORATION, 2001 & 2355 SOUTH TIBBS REGION 5, 77 WEST JACKSON BLVD., HRP-8J, EFFECTIVE APRIL 3, 2001 AVENUE, INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46206 CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 AMERICAN AXLE PLANT SITE, 1001 E. NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF NYSDEC , ORDER ON CONSENT, INDEX # DELAVAN AVENUE, BUFFALO, NY 14215, ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, DIVISION B9-0681-04-12, EFFECTIVE 9/10/06 DEC ID #915196 OF ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION, REGION 9, 270 MICHIGAN AVE., BUFFALO, NY 14203 BAY CITY MIDDLEGROUND LANDFILL, 1200 MDEQ, 402 KETCHUM STREET, BAY CITY, MI CONSENT DECREE 98-3513-CE-B, DATED EVERGREEN DRIVE, BAY CITY, MI 10/6/98 BBCC CASE - INITIAL ENFORCEMENT KAREN PEACEMAN, OFFICE OF REGIONAL COMPLAINT AND COMPLIANCE ORDER ACTION WAS BROUGHT AGAINST: PONTIAC COUNSEL (C-14J), U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL RCRA-05-2004 0001 (CASE NAME "IN RE EAST ASSEMBLY PLANT, 2100 SOUTH PROTECTION AGENCY, REGION 5, 77 WEST GENERAL MOTORS AUTOMOTIVE - NORTH OPDYKE ROAD, PONTIAC, MI 48341-3155 -- JACKSON BOULEVARD, CHICAGO, IL 60604-3590 AMERICA - DOCKET NO. RCRA-05-2004- ORION ASSEMBLY PLANT, 4555 GIDDINGS 0001) AND CAFO DOCKET NOS.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inside Look
    HINK PRING T S MSRP $32,730 Buy for $28,258 Stk 589666 AdditionalA Journey Rebates Available. 2015 Dodge Journey you’llCall never for details. forget! Take aNever test a Document drive! Fee • Never A Dealer Prep Fee • Never An Interest Rate Mark Up E. Main St., Rtes. 9 & 32, Ware Just Over the West Brookfield Line 413-967-4210 or 800-793-2078 • www.guzikmotors.com Mailed free to requesting homes in East Brookfield, West Brookfield, North Brookfield, Brookfield, Leicester and Spencer Vol. XXXVI, No. 17 COMPLIMENTARY HOME DELIVERY ONLINE: WWW.SPENCERNEWLEADER.COM Friday, April 24, 2015 THIS WEEK’S QUOTE An inside look “Dive into the sea STUDENTS LEARN ABOUT SEVERAL of thought, and DIFFERENT CAREER PATHS find there pearls beyond price.” BY KEVIN FLANDERS NEWS STAFF WRITER Moses Ibn Ezra SPENCER — Knox Trail Junior High School students got firsthand insights last week into what it’s like EDITOR’S to work in several fields, as the school held its inaugural Career Day. OFFICE HOURS The April 17 event included a hand- Kevin Flanders photo ful of individuals with different back- MONDAYS 12-5 Quaboag Regional Middle High School’s drama department grounds and occupations, each with performed “High School Musical” last weekend. WEDNESDAYS 1-5 intriguing stories to share about their FRIDAYS 1-5 respective industries. For the first ever program, school officials were thrilled by the results and hope to bring Career Day back next year. Song and dance “It couldn’t have gone better. The INSIDE speakers were great with the kids, and everyone learned a lot from having Obituaries .................B2 them come,” said Casey Suter, a guid- Our Towns ................B4 ance counselor intern at Knox Trail QUABOAG GOES ALL OUT FOR Calendar...................B5 who helped organize the event.
    [Show full text]
  • Reports from Town Departments, Committees, Boards & Commissions
    Section I Reports from Town Departments, Committees, Boards, & Commissions General Government Board of Selectmen & Town Administrator The Board of Selectmen saw one change in its membership during calendar 2011; Selectman John Connolly announced that he did not intend to run for reelection at the expiration of his term; Nicholas S. Mabardy was elected to the Board in the spring Town Election. There were several common themes in the initiatives and accomplishments of the Board of Selectmen and Town Administrator this year, notably ensuring continued progress with our many community “greening” programs, advancing the Town’s financial stability, and continued analysis and implementation of efficiency improvements in town operations. In 2010, the Town of Natick was designated as a “Green Community” by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, and in 2011 the Town leveraged the opportunities made available through this designation and associated grant funds to launch several initiatives. These opportunities are very much appreciated and sought out by the Board of Selectmen and Town Administrator, who help to guide the proper stewardship of our resources and community. Specific project examples in 2011 include: • Installation of solar photovoltaic panels at the Wilson and Kennedy Middle Schools and Me- morial and Bennett-Hemenway Elementary Schools for an estimated total first year energy savings of close to $70,000. Further installations have been approved for the new Natick High School and Community/Senior Center for additional estimated first year savings of $20,000. All told, these projects will reduce Natick’s greenhouse gas (carbon dioxide) emissions by an es- timated 1.16 million pounds per year, an amount equivalent to removing 390 cars from Natick roads annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Framingham Cultural Resource Inventory Town of Framingham
    Framingham Cultural Resource Inventory Town of Framingham, Massachusetts Framingham Historical Commission February, 2017 INVENTORY OF CULTURAL RESOURCES TOWN OF FRAMINGHAM, MASSACHUSETTS As of February, 2017 The Framingham Historical Commission is pleased to present this updated version of the town’s Inventory of Cultural Resources. The previous update was March 1, 2001. The inventory now includes 733 buildings, monuments cemeteries, and other sites which contribute to the historical and architectural heritage of the town of Framingham. Of these, 475 are seen to be of special significance as having been listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the Historic Architectural Buildings Survey, and/or one or more local authority of recognition. This includes: National Register: Individual Listings 14 Historic District Listings 200 Register Eligible 6 Total 220 Historic American Buildings Survey 9 Framingham Local Historic District properties 89 Framingham Historical Commission marker eligible 112 Framingham History Center listing 38 Properties with preservation restrictions 7 Other properties and structures, which have been recognized by the Massachusetts Historical Commission independent of this body are included in the inventory. All town-owned buildings and structures are included. In the first twenty years, since the inventory was established, 1980 – 2000, twenty seven (27) properties/structures were lost to demolition, fire, etc. In the current period, 2000- 2016, an additional nineteen (19) properties/structures were lost and twenty (20) were added. EXPLANATION OF CODES I. AREA LETTER Some buildings in the inventory are part of a grouping of structures that gives them extra meaning in terms of their cultural value. These groupings may be neighborhoods, historic districts, or institutional complexes such as the buildings of Framingham State University.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa De Mobilidade Acadêmica (Pma)
    0 PROGRAMA DE MOBILIDADE ACADÊMICA (PMA) 1 SUMÁRIO 1. APRESENTAÇÃO DO PROGRAMA ................................................................. 3 2. APRESENTAÇÃO DAS INSTITUIÇÕES DE ENSINO SUPERIOR DA MANTENEDORA 4 2.1 FACULDADE GALILEU ............................................................................ 4 2.1.1 SOBRE BOTUCATU ................................................................ 6 2.1.2 ASPECTOS GEOGRÁFICOS ...................................................... 8 2.1.3 ASPECTOS HISTÓRICOS ....................................................... 12 2.1.4 ASPECTOS ECONÔMICOS E SOCIAIS ...................................... 14 2.2 FACULDADE GRAN TIETÊ ..................................................................... 23 2.2.1 SOBRE BARRA BONITA ......................................................... 26 2.2.2 ASPECTOS GEOGRÁFICOS .................................................... 31 2.2.3 ASPECTOS HISTÓRICOS ....................................................... 33 2.2.4 ASPECTOS ECONÔMICOS E SOCIAIS ...................................... 34 2.3FACULDADE VAN GOGH ........................................................................................................ 37 2.3.1 SOBRE SÃO PAULO .............................................................. 37 2.3.2 ASPECTOS ECONÔMICOS ..................................................... 45 2.3.3 POPULAÇÃO DO ENSINO MÉDIO REGIONAL ............................. 57 2.4 FATEC-USA ....................................................................................... 63
    [Show full text]
  • August 22, 2008 Reference No. 012618-07 Mr. Stephen M. Johnson
    45 Farmington Valley Drive, Plainville, CT 06062 Telephone: (860) 747-1800 Facsimile: (860) 747-1900 CONESTOGA-ROVERS & ASSOCIATES www.CRAworld.com August 22, 2008 Reference No. 012618-07 Mr. Stephen M. Johnson Deputy Regional Director Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Northeast Regional Office One Winter Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108 Dear Mr. Johnson: Re: Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan Revision 1 RTN: 3-3940 Former Settling Lagoon and Beaverdam Brook 63 Western Avenue, Framingham, Massachusetts Conestoga-Rovers & Associates (CRA) has prepared this letter, on behalf of General Motors Corporation (GM), to provide to the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MADEP) and the Framingham Conservation Commission (FCC), the Phase IV Remedy Implementation Plan (RIP) Revision 1. The Phase IV RIP Revision 1 is being submitted as part of the Comprehensive Response Actions being conducted in accordance with the Massachusetts Contingency Plan (MCP) at the above-referenced Site. The original Phase IV RIP was submitted on December 21 2007 and provided full compliance with Section VII. D 3 of the Administrative Consent Orders With Penalty (ACOPs) NE-05-3A042 and ACOP-NE-05-3A043. This revision incorporates updates to certain remedial action (RA) activities based on discussions with the MADEP and FCC during the permitting process for the 401 Water Quality Certificate W220656 and the Wetlands Order of Conditions (NE 158-1152). The Phase IV RIP Revision 1 includes the following: · Engineering Design; · Storm Water Management Plan; · Construction Quality Assurance Plan; · Health and Safety Plan; · Permitting and Approvals; · Restoration Plan; and · Public Communication Plan. By way of background, GM sold the majority of the former Framingham Assembly Plant Property to ADESA Corporation in 1994 as well as a portion of primarily wetlands to CSX, Inc.
    [Show full text]