Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus V

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus V DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law Volume 1 Issue 1 Spring 1991 Article 6 Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., 917 F.2d 278 (7th Cir. 1990) Juliana Stratton Follow this and additional works at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip Recommended Citation Juliana Stratton, Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., 917 F.2d 278 (7th Cir. 1990), 1 DePaul J. Art, Tech. & Intell. Prop. L. 22 (1991) Available at: https://via.library.depaul.edu/jatip/vol1/iss1/6 This Case Summaries is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Law at Via Sapientiae. It has been accepted for inclusion in DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law by an authorized editor of Via Sapientiae. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Stratton: Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldm CASE SUMMARIES On July 3, 1988, Goldberg negotiated an agreement Autocephalous with the two art dealers and their attorney to Greek-Orthodox Church of purchase the mosaics for $1,080,000 and to split Cyprus v. Goldberg & any future resale profits with the other three par- ties. Goldberg testified that she made several in- Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., quiries into whether the mosaics were reported 917 F2d 278 (7th Cir. 1990) stolen or missing and sought assurance that no existing treaty prevented the importation of the Introduction mosaics into the United States. On July 7, 1988, In Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cy- upon securing financing from an Indianapolis prus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc., the Bank, Goldberg purchased the mosaics in Switzer- Seventh Circuit affirmed an Indiana federal dis- land for $1.08 million. Within months, Goldberg trict court's holding that an art dealer was to relin- began her attempts to market and sell the mosaics. quish possession of stolen cultural property to its that the Church of Cyprus original owners, the Greek-Orthodox church. The It was then, late 1988, Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus discovered Goldberg had possession of the mosaics of Cyprus requested, in ("Church of Cyprus"), along with the Republic of in Indiana. The Church Goldberg return the mosaics, which Cyprus, brought a right of replevin action against writing, that Peg Goldberg ("Goldberg") and Goldberg & Feld- she refused to do. In March of 1989, the Church of man Fine Arts, Inc. Plaintiff-Appellee, the Church Cyprus filed suit in the Southern District of Indiana 2 district of Cyprus, claimed the removal of the mosaics was to recover the mosaics from Goldberg. The unauthorized and that the church maintained the court held that the cause of action was timely; it did right to possession. Defendant-Appellant Goldberg not accrue until appellees, by using due diligence, knowledge of who pos- claimed the mosaics were purchased in good faith knew or had reasonable and without any knowledge that they were stolen. sessed the mosaics. Further, the district court held The court, finding the Church of Cyprus used due that under the applicable substantive law of Indi- diligence in trying to locate the mosaics, held that ana, the Church of Cyprus was entitled to posses- its cause of action did not accrue until the possessor sion of the mosaics. Defendant Goldberg appealed of the mosaics was identified. The Court of Appeals the decision claiming that the court below commit- The Seventh Circuit upheld the lower court's ruling that the mosaics ted several reversible errors. were to be returned to the Church of Cyprus, the disagreed with Goldberg and affirmed the lower rightful owner. court's decision. Facts Legal Analysis The four Byzantine mosaics were first discovered First, Goldberg contended that the Church of Cy- missing by the Church of Cyprus in November of prus failed to file a timely complaint because 1979. The actual theft is presumed to have taken Indiana's statute of limitations for replevin actions place between August 1974 and October 1979, fol- runs for six years from the time the cause of action lowing the Turkish military occupation of northern accrues. The Seventh Circuit gave great deference Cyprds. Upon learning of the theft, the Republic of to the court below concerning the issue of when the Cyprus immediately took measures to inform con- Church of Cyprus' cause of action accrued under cerned organizations of its significant loss of cul- this Indiana statute. The court upheld the district tural property and to seek assistance in recovering court's application of a discovery rule which limits the missing pieces. the accrual of a cause of action to when a plaintiff knew, or should have known through due diligence, While in Amsterdam on July 1, 1988, defendant that a cause of action existed.3 Here, the Church of Goldberg was informed of the four Christian mosa- Cyprus was not aware it had a cause of action ics by an Indianapolis art dealer, a Dutch art dealer, against Goldberg until it learned of her identity and and their "attorney, who informed Goldberg that whereabouts in late 1988. The court found the such works were available for purchase. Goldberg complaint filed in March 1989 to be within the six was told that the seller of the mosaics was a Turkish year statute of limitations and, therefore, timely. antiquities dealer who "'found' the mosaics in the rubble of an 'extinct' church in northern Cyprus."1 22 Journal of Art & Entertainment Law Published by Via Sapientiae, 2016 1 DePaul Journal of Art, Technology & Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 1, Iss. 1 [2016], Art. 6 identified Goldberg as the current possessor of the The district court also held, in the alternative, that 8 the doctrine of fraudulent concealment would apply mosaics that the cause of action accrued. Under this doc- to toll the statute of limitations. The concurrence also considered the use of both a plaintiff trine, the use of deceit or fraud to prevent international law and United States law for pro- a cause of action prohibits a defen- from learning of tecting the cultural property of foreign nations. In the statute of limitations as a dant from raising particular, Cudahy mentioned the 1954 Hague bar.4 Again, the plaintiff is required to have used Convention and the UNESCO Convention as the its property.5 The due diligence in trying to locate most significant multinational treaties, as well as did not pass on the appropriate Seventh Circuit the United States' Cultural Property Implementa- application of fraudulent concealment, and, in- tion Act.9 Under these regulations, Cudahy pre- use of the discov- stead, accepted the lower court's dicted the Cypriotic mosaics would not only be ery rule. returned to the rightful owners, but doing so would Goldberg also attempted to suggest that the send a message that the cultural heritage of foreign Church of Cyprus did not use due diligence in its lands is to be respected. efforts to locate the missing mosaics. The Court of Appeals agreed with the district court that this Conclusion determination was to be made on a case-by-case A similar suit was filed in Federal District Court in basis and that great deference was to be given to Dallas in June 1990 by the Lutheran Church of the court below in its review. The court agreed with Quedlinburg, Germany to recover medieval trea- the conclusion that the Church of Cyprus was, in sures from the heirs of an American army officer fact, duly diligent in its attempts to locate the stolen who stole the artworks at the conclusion of World cultural property and the cause of action could not War II.10 The parties agreed in January of 1991 to reasonably have been discovered prior to late 1988. settle this dispute out of court; the heirs received $1 million for the return of the treasures and relin- Finally, the Seventh Circuit reviewed the merits of quished all claims of ownership." In addition, the the replevin claim to determine whether the heirs received $1.85 million in the spring of 1990 Church of Cyprus established its entitlement to the for two other Quedlinburg manuscripts. 12 mosaics. The court upheld the district court's use of Indiana substantive law to find that the Church of Attorney Thomas R. Kline of Andrews & Kurth in Cyprus had indeed met this burden.6 The Church Washington, D.C. who represented the Church of of Cyprus demonstrated that it did have title to Cyprus and the Lutheran Church of Quedlinburg possession, the mosaics were removed without au- says it is difficult to compare the very different thorization, and that Goldberg wrongfully held pos- results of the two cases because Texas law was not session of the mosaics. Goldberg never had a valid applied in the latter cause of action.1 3 Kline further claim of title to the mosaics because she purchased points out that it is actually irrelevant in the them from a thief who neither had a valid right of Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg case how diligently 7 possession nor could transfer any such right. Goldberg inquired about the mosaics because in the United States, a seller who does not possess good The Seventh Circuit declined to review the district title (e.g., a thief) has no authority to pass claim of substantive law court's alternative use of Swiss title to-a-buyer. Kline predicts that in future cases, not a "good faith which found that Goldberg was and, in the Quedlinburg treasure case had it gone purchaser" because she made only a perfunctory to trial, the courts will emphasize application of the of the sale of the inquiry into the suspicious nature discovery rule and the definition of fraudulent con- mosaics.
Recommended publications
  • Monastery of Kykkos
    Monastery of Kykkos 1 The monastery of the Virgin of Kykkos is located at an altitude of approximately 1,200 meters, about one kilometer from mountain Kykkos, a 1,318 m high peak in the western part of the Troodos range. That peak is also known by the name Throni or Throni of Panagia. The monastery is the most famous and rich among the active Cypriot monasteries of our time. It is also one of the most important in terms of history as well as national and social work. The Holy Monastery of Panagia of Kykkos was founded around the end of the 11th century by Byzantine Emperor Alexios I Komnenos, and since then has housed the icon of the Virgin reputedly painted by Apostle Luke. According to the tradition concerning the establishment of the Monastery, a virtuous hermit called Esaias used to live in a cave on the mountain of Kykkos. One day, Manuel Boutomites, the Byzantine governor of the island, who was spending his summer holidays at a village in the Marathasa valley went hunting and was lost in the forest. He came upon the hermit and asked him how he could go back. Esaias wished to avoid all things of this world and so did not reply. His attitude angered Boutomites, who resorted to verbal and even physical abuse. Shortly afterwards, Boutomites was taken ill with an incurable disease. This led him to recall his inhuman behaviour towards Esaias and asked God to make him well so that he could go to the hermit and ask him for his forgiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sacraments of the Assyrian Church of the East
    1 The Sacraments of the Assyrian Church of the East The Sacraments of the Assyrian Church of the East Most Rev. Mar Awa Royel Bishop of California First and foremost, in the Western theological jargon the word ‘sacrament’ is spoken of. It comes from the Latin sacramentum, which originally denoted a sacred oath; in general, it was the oath that a Roman soldier gave to Caesar upon the soldier’s inscription in the Roman army.1 It had, therefore, a sacred tone to it—one solemnly vowed to uphold and defend Caesar and the Roman Empire. In the Greek-speaking East, the word for sacrament is mysterion, and in its origins, it refers to the sacred, secret Mystery Cults of the Greek religion (the secret rites of ‘Bacchius’ come immediately to mind). Only those inducted into these sacred rites would be able to know the ‘mystery’ and what it entails. The Assyrian Church of the East makes use of the term rāzā to denote ‘sacrament’ or ‘mystery.’ It comes from the Middle Persian (Pahlavi) term ‘raz,’ meaning something concealed; hidden.2 It must have made its way into Assyrian and then Aramaic sometime in the 4th or 5th century B.C.3 A rāzā, or sacrament, is essentially a mystery through which God acts to impart to us his grace, but we don’t know how this happens. However, we do feel the 1 The first Christian writer to use the word ‘sacrament’ was Tertullian (3rd century), who explained that through Baptism we are ‘enlisted’ into the army of Christ.
    [Show full text]
  • “Religious Freedom and Holy Sites in the Republic of Cyprus”
    “Religious Freedom and Holy Sites in the Republic of Cyprus”. “Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief, and freedom either alone or in community with others and in public or private, to manifest his religion or belief in teaching, practice, worship and observance.” (Article 18, UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights) Cyprus possesses a unique history and an ancient civilization that dates back to 9000 BC. Thanks to its geographical location close to the Holy Land, it was one of the earliest countries to embrace Christianity: in 45 AD, when the Apostles Paul, Barnabas and Mark travelled to the island and preached the gospel. It is for this reason that the whole island resembles an open museum of Christian Art, with a huge number of churches and monasteries in urban rural and mountainous areas, frequently decorated with mosaics, murals and icons from every historical period. In Cyprus, the religion of the vast majority of the population – 80% – is Orthodox Christian, while 18% are Muslims and 2% is Maronite Christians, Armenians and Latins. Throughout history, the island’s religious communities coexisted and cooperated together without so much as a single religious conflict! On the contrary, the degree of mutual respect and acceptance was such that, in the towns and villages of Cyprus, Christian churches frequently stood next to Muslim mosques. People lived together, side by side, they took part in one another’s celebrations and they shared one another’s joys and sorrows. This long tradition of peace and friendship among the island’s communities was shattered and mortally wounded by the tragic events of 1974.
    [Show full text]
  • The Great and Holy Synod and Why It Is Important for Orthodoxy
    The Great and Holy Synod And Why It is Important for Orthodoxy Background Information—The Ecumenical Councils In the year 325, the Emperor Constantine convened the First Ecumenical Council in Nicea. Why? To put order where there was chaos. In the first three centuries of Christianity, the church was underground and persecuted. When Christianity became the legal religion of the Roman Empire in the early 4th century, as the churches of the various cities began communicating openly, there was disagreement, even scandal and heresy, because there was not agreement on basic tenets of the faith. The First Ecumenical Council gathered all the bishops of all the churches together, and after deliberation and prayer, the result of this Council was the Nicene Creed (our confession of faith) and the Canon of Scripture. Between 325 and 787, seven such Councils were held, which have given us the backbone of our Orthodox theology and praxis. For a Council to be truly “Ecumenical”, it means that all the churches are involved. Following the Great Schism in 1054, and now the further fracturing of Christianity into thousands of denominations, it is not possible to have a Council that is truly “Ecumenical.” The Autocephalous Churches In the Ancient Church, there were five “Patriarchates”—Rome, Constantinople, Jerusalem, Antioch and Alexandria. It is not the Orthodox “tradition” to have one “pope” who speaks infallibly for the whole church. Rather, our system of governance is “collegial” or “synodical.” There were, in the beginning, five autocephalous, or self- governing churches, each being led by a “Patriarch.” The Patriarch of Constantinople is recognized as the “Ecumenical Patriarch.” While he does not have administrative authority over the “Autocephalous” Churches, when all the churches gather together, he sits as the “first among equals.” The Seven Ecumenical Councils, or Synods, were convened under the “synodical” system that was the “tradition” among the ancient Patriarchates.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greek Church of Cyprus, the Morea and Constantinople During the Frankish Era (1196-1303)
    The Greek Church of Cyprus, the Morea and Constantinople during the Frankish Era (1196-1303) ELENA KAFFA A thesis submitted to the University of Wales In candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of History and Archaeology University of Wales, Cardiff 2008 The Greek Church of Cyprus, the Morea and Constantinople during the Frankish Era (1196-1303) ELENA KAFFA A thesis submitted to the University of Wales In candidature for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of History and Archaeology University of Wales, Cardiff 2008 UMI Number: U585150 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U585150 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 ABSTRACT This thesis provides an analytical presentation of the situation of the Greek Church of Cyprus, the Morea and Constantinople during the earlier part of the Frankish Era (1196 - 1303). It examines the establishment of the Latin Church in Constantinople, Cyprus and Achaea and it attempts to answer questions relating to the reactions of the Greek Church to the Latin conquests.
    [Show full text]
  • Orthodoxy in a New Europe: Problems and Perspectives
    Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 24 Issue 3 Article 3 6-2004 Orthodoxy in a New Europe: Problems and Perspectives Bishop Hilarion Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Eastern European Studies Commons Recommended Citation Hilarion, Bishop (2004) "Orthodoxy in a New Europe: Problems and Perspectives," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 24 : Iss. 3 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol24/iss3/3 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ORTHODOXY IN A NEW EUROPE: PROBLEMS AND PERSPECTIVES by Bishop Hilarion (Alfayev) Bishop Hilarion (Alfayev) of Vienna and Austria has been the representative of the Russian Orthodox Church to the European Institutions (Brussels) for the past two years. He edits the Newsletter, Europaica: Bulletin of the Representation of the Russian Orthodox Church to the European Institutions, which appears periodically in English, French and German. The following paper was delivered at the Lavra of St. Peter in Salzburg on December 11, 2003, and is reprinted here from Europaica No. 35 (3/2/2004). Many people associate Europe mainly with the Catholic and Protestant traditions. Recently Islam, a religion that has attracted much attention in mass media, has been added to this list, and attempts are often made to predict the results of its growth in European countries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Orthodox Veneration of Mary the Birthgiver of God
    Om Den Ortodokse Kirke i Den ortodokse De Kirkeårets Ikoner Litteratur Links Kontakt Artikler Danmark tro hellige gang Vi har fået lov af Saint Mary of Egypt web-site lægge deres elektroniske udgave af nedenstående bog på vores egen side. Vi er dem stor tak skyldig. Archbishop John Maximovitch: The Orthodox Veneration of Mary the Birthgiver of God Saint John of Shanghai & San Francisco Introduction | The Veneration of the Mother of God During Her Earthly Life | The First Enemies of the Veneration of The Mother of God | Attempts of Jews and Heretics to Dishonor The Ever-Virginity of Mary | The Nestorian Heresy and The Third Ecumenical Council | Attempts of Iconoclasts to Lessen The Glory of the Queen of Heaven; They Are Put to Shame | Zeal Not According to Knowledge: The Immaculate Conception | The Orthodox Veneration of The Mother of God INTRODUCTION The Orthodox Theology of Archbishop John Maximovitch Fr. Seraphim Rose NOT TOO MANY years ago the Abbess of a convent of the Russian Orthodox Church, a woman of righteous life, was delivering a sermon in the convent church on the feast of the Dormition of the Most Holy Mother of God. With tears she entreated her nuns and the pilgrims who had come for the feast to accept entirely and wholeheartedly what the Church hands down to us, taking such pains to preserve this tradition sacredly all these centuries-and not to choose for oneself what is "important" and what is "dispensable"; for by thinking oneself wiser than the tradition, one may end by losing the tradition. Thus, when the Church tells us in her hymns and icons that the Apostles were miraculously gathered from the ends of the earth in order to be present at the repose and burial of the Mother of God, we as Orthodox Christians are not free to deny this or reinterpret it, but must believe as the Church hands it down to us, with simplicity of heart.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Orthodox Churches in the European Union Lucian N. Leustean Aston University, Birmingham, UK Abstract This Articl
    The Politics of Orthodox Churches in the European Union Lucian N. Leustean Aston University, Birmingham, UK Abstract This article focuses on the political mobilisation of Orthodox churches in the making of the European Union from the 1950 Schuman Declaration until today. It examines the first contacts between Orthodox churches and European institutions, the structure of religious dialogue, policy areas of Orthodox engagement in the European Union, and competing visions of Europe in the Orthodox commonwealth. It argues that the response of Orthodox churches to the institutionalisation of religious dialogue in the European Union (Article 17 of the Lisbon Treaty) is comparable to that of other religious communities. However, the political mobilisation of Orthodox representations in Brussels advances a geopolitical and civilisational dimension which places the Eastern Orthodox world as a competitor to the secular West. Keywords Orthodox engagement in the EU; Eastern Orthodoxy and secular West; ‘Soul for Europe’; World Council of Churches (WCC); Conference of European Churches (CEC); Charta Oecumenica; Symphonia; Committee of Representatives of Orthodox Churches to the European Union (CROCEU); Commission of the Bishops’ Conferences of the European Union (COMECE) Introduction Opening religious offices in Brussels has been akin to an industrial enterprise. In post- Maastricht Europe, Christian churches, Muslim and Jewish communities, and Humanist bodies have set up offices in Brussels and Strasbourg representing a wide range of religious and convictional values. The number of faith-based representations have gradually increased after Jacques Delors, President of the European Commission, encouraged a more active reflection in political circles of the role of religious communities and philosophical organisations in the making of the European Union (EU).
    [Show full text]
  • The Case of the Kykkos Monastery
    Religions 2010, 1, 54-77; doi:10.3390/rel1010054 OPEN ACCESS religions ISSN 2077-1444 www.mdpi.com/journal/religions Article Economic Functions of Monasticism in Cyprus: The Case of the Kykkos Monastery Victor Roudometof 1,* and Michalis N. Michael 2 1 Department of Social and Political Sciences, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus 2 Department of Turkish and Middle Eastern Studies, University of Cyprus, PO Box 20537, Nicosia 1678, Cyprus; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed: E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 9 October 2010; in revised form: 18 November 2010 / Accepted: 25 November 2010 / Published: 1 December 2010 Abstract: The article presents a comprehensive overview of the various economic activities performed by the Kykkos Monastery in Cyprus in its long history (11th–20th centuries). The article begins with a brief review of the early centuries of Cypriot monasticism and the foundation of the monastery in the 11th century. Then, the analysis focuses on the economic activities performed during the period of the Ottoman rule (1571–1878). Using primary sources from the monastery’s archives, this section offers an overview of the various types of monastic land holdings in the Ottoman era and the strategies used to purchase them. Using 19th century primary sources, it further presents a detailed account of the multifaceted involvement and illustrates the prominent role of the monastery in the island’s economic life (land ownership, stockbreeding activities, lending of money, etc.). Next, it examines the changes in monastic possessions caused by the legislation enacted by the post-1878 British colonial administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Appropriation of Church Buildings in Northern Cyprus
    Online Journal of Art and Design volume 9, issue 4, October 2021 Appropriation of Church Buildings in Northern Cyprus Yasemin İnce Güney* and Hülya Yüceer** *Balıkesir University, [email protected] **İzmir Institute of Technology, [email protected] ABSTRACT The appropriation of places of worship by communities associated with different religions has been a common practice throughout history, although the aims of and processes for such appropriations may vary. In some cases, it can be interpreted as a cultural conquest. Alternatively, it can be a convenient adaptation to provide a place for prayer while maintaining the sanctity of the place. The process of appropriation provides an understanding of cultures and their change over time. Given the changing dynamics of long, on-going conflicts in Cyprus, this article aims to trace the relationship between heritage and contemporary cultural dynamics by examining the process of the appropriation of church buildings in northern Cyprus before and after the conflict that resulted in the division of the island in 1974. Keywords: Cyprus, church, mosque, heritage, conflict INTRODUCTION The Republic of Cyprus, established in 1960, has been a troubled state since the armed conflict in 1963 when the Turkish Cypriot legislators rejected the proposed amendments to the constitution and Turkish representation left the government. The political problems between the two communities eventually led to the permanent division of the island following a military intervention by Turkey in 1974. This dramatic development was accompanied by a massive population movement between the north and the south. The division forced both communities to separate and have no contact for the next thirty years.
    [Show full text]
  • "Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus V. Goldberg
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 43 Issue 6 Issue 6 - Symposium: Law, Literature, Article 11 and Social Change 11-1990 "Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc".: Entrenchment of the Due Diligence Requirement in Replevin Actions for Stolen Art Stephen L. Foutty Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the International Law Commons Recommended Citation Stephen L. Foutty, "Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc".: Entrenchment of the Due Diligence Requirement in Replevin Actions for Stolen Art, 43 Vanderbilt Law Review 1839 (1990) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol43/iss6/11 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RECENT DEVELOPMENT Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc.: Entrenchment of the Due Diligence Requirement in Replevin Actions for Stolen Art I. INTRODUCTION ......................................... 1839 II. STATUTES OF LIMITATIONS IN REPLEVIN ACTIONS ......... 1842 A. Background.............................. 1842 B. Accrual upon Wrongful Possession .............. 1843 C. Demand Requirement .......................... 1844 III. EMERGENCE OF THE DUE DILIGENCE REQUIREMENT ...... 1845 A. N ew York ..................................... 1846 1. Menzel v. List ........................... 1846 2. Kunstsammlungen zu Weimar v. Elicofon.. 1847 3. DeWeerth v. Baldinger ................... 1848 B. Indiana: Autocephalous Greek-Orthodox Church of Cyprus v. Goldberg & Feldman Fine Arts, Inc ... 1851 IV. ANALYSIS OF THE DUE DILIGENCE REQUIREMENT .......
    [Show full text]
  • Download (5MB)
    https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ Theses Digitisation: https://www.gla.ac.uk/myglasgow/research/enlighten/theses/digitisation/ This is a digitised version of the original print thesis. Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] The origins and evolution of Church-State relations in Cyprus with special reference to the modern era. By Georghios Theodoulou, M.A. for the Degree of M. Th. (Research) School of Divinity University of Glasgow April 2004 ProQuest N um ber: 10390654 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10390654 Published by ProQuest LLO (2017). C o pyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code Microform Edition © ProQuest LLO.
    [Show full text]