DOCSLIB.ORG

Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2015-2016)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Table 7: Species Changing IUCN Red List Status (2015-2016) IUCN Red List version 2016-1: Table 7 Last Updated: 30 June 2016 Table 7: Species changing IUCN Red List Status (2015-2016) Published listings of a species' status may change for a variety of reasons (genuine improvement or deterioration in status; new information being available that was not known at the time of the previous assessment; taxonomic changes; corrections to mistakes made in previous assessments, etc. To help Red List users interpret the changes between the Red List updates, a summary of species that have changed category between 2015 (IUCN Red List version 2015.4) and 2016 (IUCN Red List version 2016-1) and the reasons for these changes is provided in the table below. IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered, EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern). Reasons for change: G - Genuine status change (genuine improvement or deterioration in the species' status); N - Non-genuine status change (i.e., status changes due to new information, improved knowledge of the criteria, incorrect data used previously, taxonomic revision, etc.); E - Previous listing was an Error. IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2015) List (2016) change version Category Category MAMMALS Arctonyx collaris Greater Hog Badger NT VU N 2016-1 Cephalophus dorsalis Bay Duiker LC NT G 2016-1 Cephalophus leucogaster White-bellied Duiker LC NT G 2016-1 Cephalophus silvicultor Yellow-backed Duiker LC NT G 2016-1 Cercocebus atys Sooty Mangabey VU NT N 2016-1 Chiroderma improvisum Guadeloupean Big-eared Bat VU EN N 2016-1 Chrotogale owstoni Owston's Civet VU EN N 2016-1 Conilurus penicillatus Brush-tailed Rabbit-rat NT VU G 2016-1 Dasycercus cristicauda Crest-tailed Mulgara LC NT N 2016-1 Dasyurus viverrinus Eastern Quoll NT EN G 2016-1 Dendrolagus lumholtzi Lumholtz's Tree Kangaroo LC NT N 2016-1 Eptesicus guadeloupensis Guadeloupe Big Brown Bat VU EN N 2016-1 Eumops floridanus Florida Bonneted Bat CR VU N 2016-1 Eupleres goudotii Eastern Falanouc EN VU G 2016-1 Galidictis fasciata Broad-striped Vontsira NT VU G 2016-1 Genetta abyssinica Ethiopian Genet LC DD N 2016-1 Genetta johnstoni Johnston's Genet VU NT N 2016-1 Gracilinanus dryas Wood Sprite Gracile Mouse Opossum NT LC N 2016-1 Gymnobelideus leadbeateri Leadbeater's Possum EN CR G 2016-1 Herpestes brachyurus Short-tailed Mongoose LC NT N 2016-1 Histriophoca fasciata Ribbon Seal DD LC N 2016-1 Lagostrophus fasciatus Banded Hare Wallaby EN VU N 2016-1 Lasiorhinus latifrons Southern Hairy-nosed Wombat LC NT N 2016-1 Leopoldamys neilli Neill's Leopoldamys DD LC N 2016-1 Leporillus apicalis Lesser Stick-nest Rat CR EX N 2016-1 Leptonycteris yerbabuenae Lesser Long-nosed Bat VU NT N 2016-1 Lycalopex fulvipes Darwin's Fox CR EN N 2016-1 Lyncodon patagonicus Patagonian Weasel DD LC N 2016-1 Melogale orientalis Javan Ferret Badger DD LC N 2016-1 Melogale personata Large-toothed Ferret Badger DD LC N 2016-1 Micropotamogale lamottei Nimba Otter Shrew EN NT N 2016-1 Micropotamogale ruwenzorii Rwenzori Otter Shrew NT LC N 2016-1 Molossops aequatorianus Equatorial Dog-faced Bat VU EN N 2016-1 Mus fragilicauda Sheath-tailed Mouse DD LC N 2016-1 Mustela itatsi Japanese Weasel LC NT N 2016-1 Mustela lutreolina Indonesian Mountain Weasel DD LC N 2016-1 Myonycteris relicta East African Little Collared fruit Bat VU LC N 2016-1 Myotis atacamensis Atacama Myotis NT EN N 2016-1 Myotis martiniquensis Schwartz's Myotis VU NT N 2016-1 Myotis sodalis Indiana Bat EN NT N 2016-1 Nasuella olivacea Western Mountain Coati DD NT N 2016-1 Natalus primus Cuban Greater Funnel-eared Bat CR VU N 2016-1 Notoryctes caurinus Kakarratul DD LC N 2016-1 Notoryctes typhlops Itjaritjari DD LC N 2016-1 Odobenus rosmarus Walrus DD VU G 2016-1 Onychogalea fraenata Bridled Nailtail Wallaby EN VU G 2016-1 Ornithorhynchus anatinus Platypus LC NT G 2016-1 Panthera pardus Leopard NT VU N 2016-1 Paradoxurus zeylonensis Golden Palm Civet VU LC N 2016-1 Perameles bougainville Western Barred Bandicoot EN VU N 2016-1 Petauroides volans Greater Glider LC VU G 2016-1 Petaurus australis Yellow-bellied Glider LC NT G 2016-1 Petrogale concinna Nabarlek DD EN N 2016-1 IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2015) List (2016) change version Category Category Petrogale godmani Godman's Rock Wallaby LC NT G 2016-1 Petrogale lateralis Black-footed Rock Wallaby NT VU G 2016-1 Petrogale mareeba Mareeba Rock Wallaby LC NT G 2016-1 Petrogale penicillata Brush-tailed Rock Wallaby NT VU N 2016-1 Petrogale purpureicollis Purple-necked Rock Wallaby LC NT G 2016-1 Petrogale sharmani Mount Claro Rock Wallaby NT VU N 2016-1 Phascolarctos cinereus Koala LC VU G 2016-1 Phoca largha Spotted Seal DD LC N 2016-1 Pongo pygmaeus Bornean Orangutan EN CR G 2016-1 Potorous longipes Long-footed Potoroo EN VU N 2016-1 Potorous tridactylus Long-nosed Potoroo LC NT N 2016-1 Prionailurus rubiginosus Rusty-spotted Cat VU NT N 2016-1 Pteronotus paraguanensis CR EN N 2016-1 Pteropus pohlei Geelvink Bay Flying Fox EN VU N 2016-1 Pudu puda Southern Pudu VU NT N 2016-1 Rangifer tarandus Reindeer LC VU N 2016-1 Rhynchocyon petersi Black and Rufous Sengi VU LC N 2016-1 Saccopteryx antioquensis Antioquian Sac-winged Bat DD EN N 2016-1 Sminthopsis bindi Kakadu Dunnart LC NT N 2016-1 Sminthopsis leucopus White-footed Dunnart VU LC N 2016-1 Sminthopsis psammophila Sandhill Dunnart EN VU N 2016-1 Spilogale putorius Eastern Spotted Skunk LC VU N 2016-1 Stenoderma rufum Red Fruit Bat VU NT N 2016-1 Suncus malayanus Malayan Pygmy Shrew DD LC N 2016-1 Tomopeas ravus Blunt-eared Bat VU EN N 2016-1 Uromys hadrourus Pygmy White-tailed Rat VU NT N 2016-1 Viverra megaspila Large-Spotted Civet VU EN N 2016-1 Viverra zibetha Large Indian Civet NT LC N 2016-1 Wyulda squamicaudata Scaly-tailed Possum DD NT N 2016-1 REPTILES Acanthochelys pallidipectoris Chaco Side-necked Turtle VU EN G 2016-1 Amphisbaena gracilis Slender Worm Lizard DD LC N 2016-1 Anadia bitaeniata Two-banded Anadia DD LC N 2016-1 Anadia marmorata Spotted Anadia VU LC N 2016-1 Apostolepis multicincta NT LC N 2016-1 Chelonoidis abingdonii Pinta Giant Tortoise EW EX G 2016-1 Chelonoidis darwini Santiago Giant Tortoise EN CR N 2016-1 Chelonoidis nigra Floreana Giant Tortoise VU EX N 2016-1 Epictia subcrotilla Klauber's Blind Snake DD LC N 2016-1 Geochelone elegans Indian Star Tortoise LR/lc VU G 2016-1 Gonatodes seigliei Estados Sucre Gecko DD EN N 2016-1 Lepidoblepharis montecanoensis Paraguanan Ground Gecko DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus chaltin DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus dicktracyi LC VU G 2016-1 Liolaemus flavipiceus DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus fuscus DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus hellmichi Hellmich's Tree Iguana LC VU N 2016-1 Liolaemus huacahuasicus VU LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus lemniscatus DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus leopardinus DD EN N 2016-1 Liolaemus lorenzmuelleri DD EN N 2016-1 Liolaemus nitidus Shining Tree Iguana DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus pleopholis DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus rabinoi Rabino's Tree Iguana VU CR N 2016-1 Liolaemus somuncurae DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus xanthoviridis DD LC N 2016-1 Liolaemus zapallarensis Zapallaren Tree Iguana DD LC N 2016-1 Mesoclemmys hogei Hoge's Side-necked Turtle EN CR G 2016-1 Microlophus yanezi DD LC N 2016-1 Morunasaurus peruvianus Cenepa Manticores DD LC N 2016-1 Philodryas chamissonis DD LC N 2016-1 Phyllodactylus leei San Cristóbal Island Leaf-toed Gecko VU NT N 2016-1 Phymaturus calcogaster DD LC N 2016-1 Podocnemis lewyana Magdalena River Turtle EN CR G 2016-1 Riama luctuosa Lightbulb Lizard DD LC N 2016-1 Stenocercus crassicaudatus Spiny Whorltail Iguana VU LC N 2016-1 IUCN Red List IUCN Red Reason for Red List Scientific name Common name (2015) List (2016) change version Category Category AMPHIBIANS Afrixalus dorsimaculatus VU EN N 2016-1 Afrixalus sylvaticus EN VU N 2016-1 Afrixalus uluguruensis Uluguru Banana Frog EN VU N 2016-1 Aglyptodactylus laticeps EN VU N 2016-1 Alsodes montanus Mountain Spiny-chest Frog CR VU N 2016-1 Ambystoma flavipiperatum Yellow-peppered Salamander DD EN N 2016-1 Amietophrynus urunguensis DD VU N 2016-1 Anodonthyla boulengeri Boulenger's Climbing Frog LC NT N 2016-1 Anodonthyla moramora DD EN N 2016-1 Anodonthyla nigrigularis Black-throated Climbing Frog DD EN N 2016-1 Anodonthyla theoi DD CR N 2016-1 Arthroleptis pyrrhoscelis NT LC N 2016-1 Atelognathus reverberii Laguna Raimunda Frog EN VU N 2016-1 Blommersia sarotra DD LC N 2016-1 Boehmantis microtympanum Angel's Madagascar Frog EN VU N 2016-1 Boophis andohahela DD VU N 2016-1 Boophis anjanaharibeensis DD EN N 2016-1 Boophis axelmeyeri VU LC N 2016-1 Boophis englaenderi DD VU N 2016-1 Boophis feonnyala DD EN N 2016-1 Boophis haematopus VU EN N 2016-1 Boophis jaegeri Jaeger's Bright-eyed Frog VU EN N 2016-1 Boophis laurenti Andinrgitra Bright-eyed Frog DD EN N 2016-1 Boophis liami DD CR N 2016-1 Boophis majori Ambohimitombo Bright-eyed Frog NT VU N 2016-1 Boophis miniatus Tiny Bright-eyed Frog LC VU N 2016-1 Boophis periegetes DD NT N 2016-1 Boophis sambirano VU EN N 2016-1 Boophis septentrionalis DD LC N 2016-1 Boophis sibilans DD LC N 2016-1 Boophis solomaso DD EN N 2016-1 Boophis vittatus LC VU N 2016-1 Boophis xerophilus DD LC N 2016-1 Boulengerula fischeri DD VU N 2016-1 Cardioglossa cyaneospila Mukuzira Long-fingered Frog DD NT N 2016-1 Chiropterotriton mosaueri Cave Splayfoot Salamander DD CR N 2016-1 Cophyla berara CR EN N 2016-1
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Observations on the Efficiency of the Japanese Weasel, Mustela Sibirica Itatsi Temminck & Schlegel, As a Rat-Control Agent
    980 NOTES 2.5 ppm and an LCr0 value for larvae of0.00053 ppm. mosquito larvae without adversely affecting the The ratios between the feeding activity of the guppies guppies in most bodies of water. and the LC50 for the larvae were: OMS-1211, 261; * * OMS-1210, 182; fenthion, 83; fenitrothion, 46; ronnel, 45; Dursban, 38; dichlorvos, 13; diazinon, 2; The authors wish to acknowledge the valuable sug- lindane, 0.38; dieldrin, 0.085. gestions made by Professor Manabu Sasa, Institute of From these investigations it is concluded that Medical Sciences, University of Tokyo, Japan, and by Professor Chamlong Harinasuta, Faculty of Tropical Abate is the most suitable larvicide for controlling Medicine, University of Medical Sciences, Bangkok, the larvae of C. p. fatigans in bodies of water that Thailand. The authors also wish to thank Mr Sangdow also contain guppies. The insecticides OMS-1210 Umyin and Miss Parichart Kanlayanamitr for their and OMS-1211, as well as fenthion and fenitrothion, assistance. Supplies of insecticides OMS-1210 and were also found to be very effective in controlling OMS-1211 were kindly donated by WHO. Observations on the Efficiency of the Japanese Weasel, Mustela sibirica itatsi Temminck & Schlegel, as a Rat-Control Agent in the Ryukyus * by TERU AKI UCHIDA, Zoological Laboratory, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan Laird a, b, c drew attention to the special public islands off Hokkaido and Kyushu, Japan. e, f Al- health hazards caused by rats on certain Pacific though weasels feed upon birds to some extent, islands, where the gnawing of young growing coco- Inukai's data,9 which give a quantitative analysis nuts by rats leads, not just to serious economic loss, of weasels' stomach contents, clearly indicate that but also to the consequent transformation of the murine animals form the bulk of their food under nuts into larval habitats for mosquitos, including winter conditions and that wild birds are much less vectors of Bancroftian filariasis and dengue.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirofilaria Immitis Infection in a Japanese Weasel, Mustela Itatsi Pi
    [Jpn. J. Parasitol., Vol. 45, No. 3, 230-233, June, 1996] Research Note Dirofilaria immitis Infection in a Japanese Weasel, Mustela itatsi Takashi OYAMADA, Kazumi OUCHI, Jun-ichiro YOKOUCHI, Noboru KUDO and Takashi YOSHIKAWA Department of Veterinary Parasitology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, Kitasato University, Towada, Aomori 034, Japan. (Accepted April 5, 1996) Key words: Dirofilaria immitis; Mustela itatsi; weasel. The canine heartworm, Dirofilaria immitis of the heart, lung, and kidneys were fixed with 10% (Leidy, 1856), is a parasitic nematode with cosmo buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, sectioned, politan distribution. Although the main hosts are and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Morpho carnivores, primarily dogs and wild Canidae, a logical studies were performed using a light micro number of other species of mammals, including scope and a micrometer. man, have been also reported to be infected with this nematode (Bever and Orihel, 1965; Levin, 1968; Ciferri, 1982; Soulusby, 1982; Narushima et al., 1984; Yoshimuraand Akao, 1985). However, sponta neous parasitism with this nematode in Mustelidae is encountered extremely rare in the literatures. In Japan, naturally-infected one mink (Mustela vison) and one ferret (M. putorius fur6) had been noticed (Ohishi, 1986). To date, however, the Japanese weasel, Mustela itatsi, has not been reported to be infected with D. immitis. We reported here the first case of D. immitis infection in a Japanese weasel. A male adult weasel, 295 g in body weight, was captured in Towada-shi, Aomori Prefecture, and necropsied in January, 1995. The animal was one of 45 weasels collected for the parasitological survey in eastern Aomori Prefecture during the shooting seasons from 1982 to 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogeny and Taxonomy of the Genus Mustela
    Mammal Study 33: 25–33 (2008) © the Mammalogical Society of Japan Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Mustela (Mustelidae, Carnivora), inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences: New perspectives on phylogenetic status of the back-striped weasel and American mink Naoko Kurose1, Alexei V. Abramov2 and Ryuichi Masuda3,* 1 Department of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, Kanagawa University, Kanagawa 259-1293, Japan 2 Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Saint-Petersburg 199034, Russia 3 Creative Research Initiative “Sousei”, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0810, Japan Abstract. To further understand the phylogenetic relationships among the mustelid genus Mustela, we newly determined nucleotide sequences of the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene from 11 Eurasian species of Mustela, including the domestic ferret and the American mink. Phylogenetic relationships inferred from the 12S rRNA sequences were similar to those based on previously reported mitochondrial cytochrome b data. Combined analyses of the two genes demonstrated that species of Mustela were divided into two primary clades, named “the small weasel group” and “the large weasel group”, and others. The Japanese weasel (Mustela itatsi) formerly classified as a subspecies of the Siberian weasel (M. sibirica), was genetically well-differentiated from M. sibirica, and the two species clustered with each other. The European mink (M. lutreola) was closely related to “the ferret group” (M. furo, M. putorius, and M. eversmanii). Both the American mink of North America and the back-striped weasel (M. strigidorsa) of Southeast Asia were more closely related to each other than to other species of Mustela, indicating that M. strigidorsa originated from an independent lineage that differs from other Eurasian weasels.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of the Lingual Papillae in the Least Weasel (Mustela Nivalis)
    Int. J. Morphol., 34(1):305-309, 2016. Morphology of the Lingual Papillae in the Least Weasel (Mustela nivalis) Morfología de las Papilas Linguales en la Comadreja Común (Mustela nivalis) Neveen E. R. El Bakary* & Shoichi Emura** EL BAKARY, N. E. R. & EMURA, S. Morphology of the lingual papillae in the least weasel (Mustela nivalis). Int. J. Morphol., 34(1):305-309, 2016. SUMMARY: The dorsal surface structure of the lingual papillae in the least weasel was compared with that of other carnivorous mammalian species. Two types of mechanical papillae (filiform and conical) and two types of gustatory papillae (fungiform and vallate) were observed. The filiform papillae had secondary processes. Rarely conical papillae were observed. A few taste buds were seen on the surfaces of the fungiform papillae. The four vallate papillae were located on both sides of the posterior end of the lingual body. In conclusion, morphological characteristics of the lingual papillae and their distribution in the least weasel were similar to those of the Japanese marten and ferret. The conical papillae in the lingual apex of the Japanese marten and ferret were not observed, but the conical papillae were seen in the lingual apex of the least weasel. KEY WORDS: Lingual papillae; Least weasel; Mustela nivalis; Morphology. INTRODUCTION MATERIAL AND METHOD The definite characters of the dorsal lingual surface Five tongues of healthy young adult Mustela nivalis in mammals were the shape and distribution of the lingual were obtained, immediately after their death, from a local papillae. The papillae on the lingual surface were closely hunter. The tongues were rinsed with 0.1 M cacodylate bu- related to the animal diet and feeding habits (Iwasaki, 2002; ffer (pH 7.4) and specimens bearing lingual papillae were Kumar & Bate, 2004; Erdogan et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Exploiting Interspecific Olfactory Communication to Monitor Predators
    Ecological Applications, 27(2), 2017, pp. 389–402 © 2016 by the Ecological Society of America Exploiting interspecific olfactory communication to monitor predators PATRICK M. GARVEY,1,2 ALISTAIR S. GLEN,2 MICK N. CLOUT,1 SARAH V. WYSE,1,3 MARGARET NICHOLS,4 AND ROGER P. PECH5 1Centre for Biodiversity and Biosecurity, School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand 2Landcare Research, Private Bag 92170, Auckland, 1142 New Zealand 3Royal Botanic Gardens Kew, Wakehurst Place, RH17 6TN United Kingdom 4Centre for Wildlife Management and Conservation, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand 5Landcare Research, PO Box 69040, Lincoln, 7640 New Zealand Abstract. Olfaction is the primary sense of many mammals and subordinate predators use this sense to detect dominant species, thereby reducing the risk of an encounter and facilitating coexistence. Chemical signals can act as repellents or attractants and may therefore have applications for wildlife management. We devised a field experiment to investigate whether dominant predator (ferret Mustela furo) body odor would alter the behavior of three common mesopredators: stoats (Mustela erminea), hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus), and ship rats (Rattus rattus). We predicted that apex predator odor would lead to increased detections, and our results support this hypothesis as predator kairomones (interspecific olfactory messages that benefit the receiver) provoked “eavesdropping” behavior by mesopredators. Stoats exhib- ited the most pronounced responses, with kairomones significantly increasing the number of observations and the time spent at a site, so that their occupancy estimates changed from rare to widespread. Behavioral responses to predator odors can therefore be exploited for conserva- tion and this avenue of research has not yet been extensively explored.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela Fossils Using Linear
    East Tennessee State University Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University Electronic Theses and Dissertations Student Works 5-2014 Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black- footed Ferret Conservation Nathaniel S. Fox III East Tennessee State University Follow this and additional works at: https://dc.etsu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Fox, Nathaniel S. III, "Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation" (2014). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 2339. https://dc.etsu.edu/etd/2339 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Works at Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ East Tennessee State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation _______________________________________ A thesis presented to the faculty of the Department of Geosciences East Tennessee State University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Science in Geosciences _______________________________________ by Nathaniel S. Fox May 2014 _______________________________________ Dr. Steven C. Wallace, Chair Dr. Jim I. Mead Dr. Blaine W. Schubert Keywords: Mustela, weasels, morphometrics, classification, conservation, Pleistocene, Holocene ABSTRACT Analysis of Snake Creek Burial Cave Mustela fossils using Linear & Landmark-based Morphometrics: Implications for Weasel Classification & Black-footed Ferret Conservation by Nathaniel S.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Carnívoros 2019 2ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros 2019 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20192): Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga"/wp#content/up"oads/achave_osnomes!a"egosdos$carnivoros$2019.pd% Fotografía: lince euroasiático (Lynx lynx ). Autor: Jordi Bas. &sta o'ra est( su)eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a'erto* con reco+ecemento da autor,a e sen o'ra derivada nin usos comerciais. -esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/deed.!". Licenza comp"eta: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/"e!a"code0"an!ua!es. 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont n este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións galegas para diferentes especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Primeira edición (2018): En total! ac"éganse nomes para 2#$ especies! %&ue son practicamente todos os carnívoros &ue "ai no mundo! salvante os nomes das focas% e $0 subespecies. Os nomes galegos das focas expóñense noutro recurso léxico da +"ave dedicado só aos nomes das focas! manatís e dugongos. ,egunda edición (201-): +orríxese algunha gralla! reescrí'ense as notas introdutorias e incorpórase o logo da +"ave ao deseño do documento. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase a clasificación taxonómica das familias de mamíferos carnívoros! onde se apunta! de maneira xeral! os nomes dos carnívoros &ue "ai en cada familia. seguir vén o corpo do documento! unha listaxe onde se indica! especie por especie, alén do nome científico! os nomes galegos e ingleses dos diferentes mamíferos carnívoros (nalgún caso! tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles ou o nome particular dalgunhas subespecies).
    [Show full text]
  • Food Habits of the Urban Japanese Weasels Mustela Itatsi Revealed by Faecal DNA Analysis
    Mammal Study 39: 155–161 (2014) © The Mammal Society of Japan Short communication Food habits of the urban Japanese weasels Mustela itatsi revealed by faecal DNA analysis Yoko Okawara1,*, Takeshi Sekiguchi2, Aya Ikeda3, Shingo Miura3, Hiroshi Sasaki4, Takeshi Fujii5 and Yayoi Kaneko6,** 1 Wildlife Conservation Laboratory, Division of Ecosciences, Department of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwaicho 3-5-8, Fuchu city, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan 2 Department of Molecular Biology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan 3 Laboratory of Wildlife Conservation and Management, School of Human Sciences, Waseda University, Migashima 2-579, Tokorozawa city, Saitama 359-1142, Japan 4 Chikushi Jogakuen University Junior College, 2-12-1 Ishizaka, Dazaifu, Fukuoka 818-0192, Japan 5 Natural Environment Conservation Division, Environment and Citizens Affairs Bureau, Hiroshima Prefectural Government, 10-52, Motomachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima city, Hiroshima 730-8511, Japan 6 Carnivore Ecology and Conservation Research Group, Division of Ecosciences, Department of Agriculture, Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Saiwaicho 3-5-8, Fuchu city, Tokyo 183-8509, Japan Urban ecosystems all share the overwhelming character- Past surveys of sympatric carnivores by means of fae- istic that humans “drive the system” (Gehrt et al. 2010). cal analysis have revealed difficulties in species identifi- In some cities, regional endemic species including cation (Birks et al. 2004). For weasels in Japan, experi- medium to large carnivores occur within highly anthropo- enced researchers have been able to identify droppings genic environments, e.g., Northern raccoon (Procyon based on faecal appearance and diameter (Japanese lotor) and coyote (Canis latrans) in California (Gehrt et weasels and Japanese martens M.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary of State's Standards of Modern Zoo Practice (Made Under Section 9 of the Zoo Licensing Act 1981)
    www.defra.gov.uk Secretary of State’s Standards of Modern Zoo Practice Secretary of State’s Standards of Modern Zoo Practice © Crown copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected] This document/publication is also available on our website at: http://www.defra.gov.uk/wildlife-pets/zoos/ Any enquiries regarding this document/publication should be sent to us at: Zoos Branch, Wildlife Species Conservation Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Zone 1/14b Temple Quay House 2 The Square Temple Quay Bristol BS1 6EB Telephone: 0117 372 3606 Email: [email protected] PB Number PB13806 Secretary of State’s Standards of Modern Zoo Practice Contents Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 Interpretation of terms used ................................................................................................. 1 Animal welfare in the zoo environment ................................................................................ 2 Section 1 - Provision of food and water ............................................................................... 4 Section 2 - Provision of a suitable environment ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fifty Years of Research on European Mink Mustela Lutreola L., 1761 Genetics: Where Are We Now in Studies on One of the Most Endangered Mammals?
    G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review Fifty Years of Research on European Mink Mustela lutreola L., 1761 Genetics: Where Are We Now in Studies on One of the Most Endangered Mammals? Jakub Skorupski 1,2 1 Institute of Marine and Environmental Sciences, University of Szczecin, Adama Mickiewicza 16 St., 70-383 Szczecin, Poland; [email protected]; Tel.: +48-914-441-685 2 Polish Society for Conservation Genetics LUTREOLA, Maciejkowa 21 St., 71-784 Szczecin, Poland Received: 2 October 2020; Accepted: 6 November 2020; Published: 11 November 2020 Abstract: The purpose of this review is to present the current state of knowledge about the genetics of European mink Mustela lutreola L., 1761, which is one of the most endangered mammalian species in the world. This article provides a comprehensive description of the studies undertaken over the last 50 years in terms of cytogenetics, molecular genetics, genomics (including mitogenomics), population genetics of wild populations and captive stocks, phylogenetics, phylogeography, and applied genetics (including identification by genetic methods, molecular ecology, and conservation genetics). An extensive and up-to-date review and critical analysis of the available specialist literature on the topic is provided, with special reference to conservation genetics. Unresolved issues are also described, such as the standard karyotype, systematic position, and whole-genome sequencing, and hotly debated issues are addressed, like the origin of the Southwestern population of the European mink and management approaches of the most distinct populations of the species. Finally, the most urgent directions of future research, based on the research questions arising from completed studies and the implementation of conservation measures to save and restore M.
    [Show full text]