ISSUE NO. 6 / FEB / 2021
newsletter Talking SEA USAID SEA PROJECT: IMPACTS & EXPERIENCES
SUSTAINABLY MANAGING MARINE AND COASTAL RESOURCES IN INDONESIA
USAID SUSTAINABLE ECOSYSTEMS ADVANCED (USAID SEA) PROJECT Contents
Implementing an ‘Ecosystem Approach To Fisheries Management’ 2
Promoting Sustainable Fisheries and Securing Marine Biodiversity through Marine Protected Areas 8
Supporting Marine Spatial Planning for a Sustainable Future 12
SPOTLIGHT ON Innovations 14
A Multi-Scaled Approach to Supporting Law Enforcement 16
Impact Stories from the Field: Communication Platforms Support Front-Line Enforcement 19
Incentivizing Change 21
Impact Stories from the Field: Alternative Livelihood Opportunities 22
Impact Story from the Field: Flying Fish in Fakfak 25
Changing Behaviors for a Sustainable Future 26
Building the Skills for Change 32
Supporting a Robust Legal and Regulatory Framework for Sustainable Marine and Coastal Management 34
Editor's Choice Photo 35
Cover photos clockwise from top: Biophysical survey in Lease Island MPA, Maluku, in October 2020 (CTC/ Purwanto); Small-scale fisher in Seram Sea, Maluku (USAID SEA/Ben Khan); Catch Recording with shrimp fishers in South Sorong, West Papua (WWF/Inayah); USAID SEA Project partner Marine Change conducting an underwater survey of critical reef habitat in Morotai, North Maluku (Marine Change/Alex Westover); The community around Seribu Satu Sungai Teo Enebikia MPA contributing to a Public Consultation for the Zoning and Management Plan (RPZ), conducted by USAID SEA in South Sorong, West Papua (USAID SEA/Chris Rotinsulu). i | Talking SEA No. 6 Editorial his final issue of the Talking SEA Newsletter (No. 6) is packed with Tthe tangible results of the USAID Sustainable Ecosystems Advanced (USAID SEA) Project that began in 2016 and ends March 2021. The Project has been supporting the sustainable use and management of fisheries and other marine resources in Indonesia, working closely with our government counterparts in the Ministry of Marine Alan White, Ph.D. Chief of Party Affairs and Fisheries (MMAF) and through the provincial fisheries offices in North Maluku, Maluku and West Papua. Our overall mission is to build the Finally, to ensure that EAFM, MPAs, and MSP capacity of government and non-government entities succeed, people need to understand the value of the that have significant roles supporting and ensuring that work. Without an appreciation of the objectives, Indonesian fisheries and marine areas are under wise people will not change their behaviors to take stewardship and management with benefits accruing to the necessary actions to conserve and manage local stakeholders. resources. Thus, we also put a major focus on behavior change and education. Part of the recipe At first, it might appear easy to support marine for behavior change is having incentives to support conservation and fisheries management in three that change (e.g., income from tourism, stable fish provinces and partially across FMA 715. But, if you ask catch, rights to local fishing grounds, etc.). our core staff and 13 NGO and university partners, they will say otherwise. Rather, the SEA Project has I am amazed at how much we accomplished in the been a complex undertaking that to succeed had to be USAID SEA Project. I thank our core staff and all the fully integrated across a range of sectors and activities, staff of our partner NGOs for their excellent work and coordinated among actors so that synergies from and being part of this complex undertaking. I see the the activities support the long-term outcomes of project whole as an interconnected organism, where enduring capacity, sustainability, and improved marine all parts depend on each other to function properly. ecosystems. The positive results reflect that interconnectedness of the SEA Team and the interface with all the This last issue sums up the results of our work. government agencies and communities with whom Implementing an ‘ecosystem approach to fisheries we have worked. Success depends on collaboration, management’ (EAFM) is already a daunting task and coordination, and being very strategic in the is often considered to be inclusive to all aspects of activities undertaken in consultation with our fisheries and marine resource management. But the counterparts, from the MMAF to the smallest reality of fisheries management means it must be village in the field. Marine and fisheries resources broken into tangible sets of activities. The marine management and conservation cannot succeed biodiversity conservation track established marine without the buy-in and support of all stakeholders. protected areas (MPAs) that contribute to enhancing fisheries, protecting critical habitats, and bringing We hope you found the Talking SEA Newsletters benefits to local communities. Then, the higher-level useful. We appreciate your interest, and your planning task of marine spatial planning (MSP), which feedback is always welcome! All of the USAID SEA requires provincial-wide planning, is essential to secure Publications are available until 2025 on the USAID the most valuable marine sites and fishing areas to be SEA website (www.sea-indonesia.org). We are also free from damaging activities. Ensuring that fisheries launching a new publication of lessons learned from rules are followed and the MPAs are enforced requires the Project: Sustaining Indonesia’s Marine Environment: coordinated and effective law enforcement, and, Lessons Learned from the USAID SEA Project. Please supportive policies must be in place to legally guide avail of these publications and we are happy to have these plans and activities. served you as our audience.
Talking SEA No. 6 | 1 T promoting sustainable fisheries in FMA FMA in 715. fisheries sustainable promoting and EAFM advancing on Project SEA USAID the the we explore pages following the In (3) (2) (1) EAFM: Promoting sustainablefisheries 2 | 2016, the USAID SEA Project committed to to committed Project SEA 2016, USAID the In 2000s. late the in planning fisheries regional and national guide to began EAFM Indonesia, In whole. as a afishery of complexities the considers EAFM Instead, isolation. in fisheries on focus to tended that practices management fishing conventional to alternative an as globally emerged has EAFM decades, recent In approach tofisheriesmanagement (EAFM). APPROACH TO FISHERIESMANAGEMENT’ IMPLEMENTING AN‘ECOSYSTEM supporting three key areas of work: work: of key areas three supporting MPA SocializationinBuano, Maluku.
Talking SEA No. 6
strengthening fisheries governance. fisheries strengthening and monitoring, fisheries for systems establishing FMA in 715, fisheries for strategies harvest assessing of and the status stocks developing focused onimplementinganecosystem Indonesia, theUSAID SEAProject o promote sustainablefisheriesineastern impact of of “[EAFM is] an approach to fisheries tofisheries “[EAFM is]anapproach management anddevelopment that strives to balance diverse societal tobalancediverse strives objectives, by taking intoaccount the knowledge and uncertainties the knowledge anduncertainties about biotic, abiotic, andhuman components ofecosystemsand Responsible Fisheries. Rome. ISBN92-5-104897-5; p.6. their interactions andapplying United Nations](2003). FAO Technical Guidelinesfor UN FAO [Food and Organizationofthe Agriculture fisheries withinecologically fisheries an integrated to approach meaningful boundaries.”
Photo: CTC ANCHOVIES Raja Ampat, West Papua REEF FISH REEF FISH EAFM advances North Maluku Maluku in Eastern Indonesia FLYING FISH Fakfak, he USAID SEA Project focused West Papua SMALL on implementing EAFM in five PELAGIC FISH prioritized fisheries in FMA 715. T across FMA 715 The selected fisheries are vital to fisher and coastal Once completed, these assessments formed the communities’ livelihoods, and face increasing basis of management plans for each target fishery; pressure and risks from overfishing, destructive becoming the first completed harvest strategies in fishing and unsustainable fishing practices. Indonesia! The first step toward securing these fisheries For each fishery, the management plans identify key was to assess the status of the stocks. Data for issues to address (challenges), operational objectives these assessments included primary data (fresh (interventions) and target reference points (targets) from the field) and secondary data (existing in for sustainability, and lay out key measures and various studies and reports). Information was indicators of success (see our map on the next page gathered through collaborations between the for a snapshot of these elements for each fishery). MMAF Center for Fisheries Research (Pusat Riset Perikanan—Pusriskan) and Marine Research The area (in ha) that each harvest strategy covers Agency (Badan Riset Perikanan Laut—BRPL), is tailored to its target species’ ‘stock unit’: the area the provincial fisheries officesDinas ( Kelautan where a specie's reproductive cycle occurs plus dan Perikanan—DKPs), and USAID SEA Project the range of movement of that stock (delineated by partners (WWF, WCS, UKIP, and MDPI). genetics studies, bathymetric analysis and observed distribution/migration patterns). Using this data, stock assessments were undertaken following a three-step process: The small pelagic fish harvest strategy area covers 21,786,624 ha, based on the distribution/migration (1) training BRPL researchers and academic of small pelagic species between the Weber and counterparts from UKIP and UNIPA in new Lydekker lines (natural ecological boundaries). and improved data-limited methodologies for stock assessments1; Two of the other target fisheries also occur within the boundaries of the small pelagic fish (2) analyzing and interpreting the fisheries data management area: through these methodologies to assess the • The fisheries management plan for reef fish in status of the stocks; and North Maluku covers 41,600 ha, based on the (3) reviewing the results with the National coral coverage around Halmahera island. Commission Fisheries Resources Assessment • The area of focus for reef fish management in (Komisi Nasional Pengkajian Sumber Daya Ikan— Maluku covers 33,800 ha, based on the coral Komnas Kajiskan), senior MMAF researchers coverage around Seram Island. and senior scientists from the Indonesian The remaining two fisheries’ areas are in West Papua: Institute of Sciences (Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan • The anchovies fisheries management plan in South Indonesia—LIPI), and through various national Misool covers 75,593 ha and is based on the and international fora. fishing grounds observed during regional studies. 1 Methodologies included: (i) the length-based spawning • The flying fish management plan in Fakfak potential ratio [LBSPR] method, (ii) the length-based covers 638,798 ha, delineated by the species’ Bayesian biomass [LBB] method, and (iii) the non- equilibrium biomass dynamic model (NE-BDM); and fishing grounds. training included risk assessment procedures and projections on biomass, fishing mortality, and yields. continued on page 4
Talking SEA No. 6 | 3 SEA supported harvest strategies for prioritized fisheries in FMA 715 The combined area covered by these harvest strategies is more than 22.5 million ha: an area larger than the entire nation of Cambodia, and more than double the area of South Korea! Not only does this achievement mean there is an enormous area under improved management, it also more than quadrupled the USAID SEA Project’s aim to advance EAFM in at least 5.1 million ha of marine and coastal waters in FMA 715. #
REEF FISH NORTH MALUKU ANCHOVIES, WEST PAPUA q fish biomass q yields by traditional fishers q vessel productivity q stocks juveniles & small sizes caught q local income potential competition with lift-nets prohibition on hook sizes # 13 · Lydekker W E S T · limit on lift-net operators · closed fishing seasons P A P U A (max 10) closed fishing areas (via MPAs) Line · · lift-net zone (3km away from village coastlines) 1 reduction in fishing effort · t · reduced fishing time · 20 SPR (13 days at new moon) · relative biomass =1 · opening markets for · relative fishing mortality =1 local-caught products to · fish length at first capture = access supply chain (for optimum length of indicator species pole and line live-bait) · 10 increase in vessel productivity · 10 reduction in juvenile mortality N O R T H M A L U K U · 20 SPR · 50 communities benefiting SMALL PELAGIC, FMA 715 from home-based processing q fish biomass
q productivity qq fisher income M A L U K U FLYING FISH, WEST PAPUA fishing pressure roe production (# vessels & vessel capacity) q low benefit/participation of local communities juveniles caught 0 km Weber Line Produced by SSIC. lack of robust data in setting allowable catch rates
· reduced # fishing days · limit on # outsider vessels REEF FISH, MALUKU · reduced # fishing days
q fish population/biomass · development of local-based supply chain
opportunities and apprenticeships q vessel productivity · 10 reduction in fishing effort q 30 SPR capture of non-target species · 80 of MSY and FSMY for total allowable catches · relative biomass =1 · · relative fishing mortality =1 · reduced # fishing days · increase local participation and government · fish length at first capture ≥ 20 cm · closed fishing seasons revenue generation from the fishery
· CPUE @ 139 tons/vessel/year · closed fishing areas (via MPAs) q
Challenges Increasing 6 SEA No. Talking MSY = maximum sustainable yield · 30 SPR FMSY = fishing mortality that produces MSY · relative biomass =1 Interventions q Decreasing FMA 715 4 | CPUE = catch per unit effort · relative fishing mortality =1 SPR = spawning potential ratio · fish length at first capture = optimum length of indicator species Targets 0 50 100 200 km EAFM: Promoting sustainable fisheries SEA supports increased fish catches at key sites
ow do you know if the fishery fishers in Bintuni Bay, West Papua, experienced interventions you’ve put in place an average 41 percent increase in catch! These Hare working? One approach used results suggest sustainable fisheries measures by scientists is to assess fishers’ ‘catch per implemented at these sites were effective. unit effort’ (CPUE) by regularly measuring Management measures included the establishment the amount of fish caught by a fisher/vessel of community surveillance teams, awareness (catch) in a fixed block of time (effort). Over and reduction of destructive fishing practices, the long term it is possible to see changes in zonations for MPAs to support stock growth and catch results for fishing effort. managed access regulations in some areas. For example, if fishers at one point in time are Meanwhile, handline fishers in Maluku saw a slight regularly catching 10 kg of fish in one hour, and decline in fish catches in East Seram, Central at a later point in time are routinely catching Maluku and West Seram (-3 percent), while purse only 5 kg of fish in one hour, this indicates that seine fishers North Maluku (Tidore, North and the availability of fish (stock) in the water may be South Halmahera) found their catches remained diminishing and the fishery may be under threat. steady (only a 1 percent increase), suggesting more effort is required to implement, and Conversely, where data show that the amount promote compliance with, sustainable fisheries of catch (kg) per unit of effort (hour) is stable interventions. – or even increasing – it can indicate that the availability of stock is maintained or improving. It is important to note that this data is reliant on a relatively short-term data set, and to truly assess Under the USAID SEA Project, CPUE was change over time longer term data is needed. measured in four key fisheries, revealing increased Provided CPUE data collection is ongoing, it fish yields in North Maluku and West Papua. should be possible to see the long-term impact of Handline fishers in North Maluku (Tidore Islands, these management measures on fisheries in these South Halmahera and Morotai Island) experienced key sites. # an average 20 percent increase in fish catches over the Project period, while folding trap shrimp
Handline fishers Purse seine fishers ORTH MALUKU + 20% ORTH MALUKU + 1% Project start Project end Project start Project end
MALUKU – 3% Folding trap shrimp fishers Project start Project end WEST PAPUA + 41% Project start Project end
Talking SEA No. 6 | 5 More small fishing vessels registered than ever before in Indonesia
onitoring a fishery is essential to Why is vessel registration understand whether interventions important? are working and if the fishery M To maintain stocks in any given fishery it is is being managed sustainably. necessary to know, and ultimately manage, the Under the USAID SEA Project, a range of number and size of fishing boats permitted in the activities were implemented to support area. This is known as managing ‘fishing effort’. fisheries monitoring. By law, fishing vessels over 10 gross tonnage • Small-scale fisher logbooks were designed, (> 10 GT) require licenses and permits to developed, tested, and rolled out in target operate1, while small fishing vessels of less than areas across FMA 715 to capture and or equal to 10 GT (≤ 10 GT) do not require document data on fisheries’ catches (yields licenses but are expected to be ‘registered’. and species). This led to a draft regulation to However, small vessel registration is not the support small-scale fisher logbooks being used ‘norm’ for fishers, or fisheries officers, at any level more widely across the country. of government. Nearly all small-scale fisheries— • Various innovations were tested to track accounting for around 85 percent of Indonesia’s vessel movements and build a better picture of entire fishing sector—are unregistered. Low where fishers fish, how long their fishing trips levels of registration creates a significant challenge take, what times they fish, etc. Innovations to to monitoring fishing pressure. support supply chain traceability were also piloted at several sites with private sector operators (more information on page 14). • And finally, small fishing vessels were registered at an unprecedented level in FMA 715. 1 Indonesian Fishery Law no. 31/2004 jo no. 45/2009
1 # vessels registered 20 2 1 BPKP Pas kecil 137 BPKP 62 16 Pas ecil 531 SIPI 3 4 150 400 72