On Some Properties and Applications of Patterned Ferromagnetic Thin Films
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 204 On Some Properties and Applications of Patterned Ferromagnetic Thin Films PIERRE E. ROY ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 91-554-6624-9 2006 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7091 ! "# "$$% &$'$$ ( ( ( ) * + , * - ) ,* "$$%* . ! ) / ( ) 0 0* / * "$1* 23 * * 4!56 2&78817%%"172* / + ( ( + * , ( * . 7 79 * 0 (: (( ( ( ( (: ( ( ( + ( * + ( + ( * ( +* 0 ( (: ( ( ( 7 * , + * 4 + 9 ( 9 ( * 0 9 ( ( * ( (: ( + + * / ( + ( ( ( ( * ( ( * ; 9 + ( * ( 9 9 ( + ( 9 * <0< + !" # $ ! $ $ % & '()$ $ !*+',-, $ = ) ,* - "$$% 4!!6 &%8&7%"&1 4!56 2&78817%%"172 ' ''' 7>$2& ? '@@ *A*@ B C ' ''' 7>$2&D To my parents List of Papers included in the thesis I Pierre E. Roy and Peter Svedlindh (2004). Deterministic and fi- nite temperature micromagnetics of nanoscale structures: A sim- ulation study. J. Appl. Phys., 96:2901-2908 II S. Felton, K. Gunnarsson , P. E. Roy, P. Svedlindh, and A. Quist (2004). MFM imaging of micron-sized permalloy ellipses. J. Magn. Magn. Mater, 280:202-207 III V. Novosad, F. Y. Fradin, P. E. Roy, K. S. Buchanan, K. Yu. Gus- lienko, and S. D. Bader (2005). Magnetic vortex resonance in patterned ferromagnetic dots. Phys. Rev. B, 72:024455 IV Klas Gunnarsson, Pierre E. Roy, Solveig Felton, Johan Pihl, Peter Svedlindh, Simon Berner, Hans Lidbaum, and Sven Oscarsson (2005). Programmable Motion and Separation of Single Magnetic Particles on Patterned Magnetic Surfaces. Adv. Mat., 17:1730-1734 V Kristen S. Buchanan, Pierre E. Roy, Marcos Grimsditch, Frank Y. Fradin, Konstantin Yu. Guslienko, Sam D. Bader, and Valentyn Novosad (2005). Soliton-pair dynamics in patterned ferromag- netic ellipses. Nature Physics, 1:172-176 VI Kristen S. Buchanan , Pierre E. Roy, Frank Y. Fradin, Konstantin Yu. Guslienko, Marcos Grimsditch, Sam D. Bader, and Val Novosad (2006). Vortex dynamics in patterned ferromagnetic ellipses. J. App. Phys. 99:08C707 VII K. S. Buchanan, P. E. Roy, M. Grimsditch, F. Y. Fradin, K. Yu. Guslienko, S. D. Bader, and V. Novosad (2006). Magnetic field tunability of the vortex translational mode in micron-sized permalloy ellipses. Phys. Rev. B, 74:064404 VIII S. Felton, P. Warnicke, K. Gunnarsson, P. E. Roy, H. Lidbaum, and P. Svedlindh (2006). Domain configuration of permalloy 5 ellipses in a rotating magnetic field. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 39:610-614 List of Papers not included in the thesis IX O. Wessely, P. Roy, D. Åberg, C. Andersson, S. Edvardsson, O. Karis, B. Sanyal, P. Svedlindh, M. I. Katsnelson, R. Gunnarsson, D. Arvanitis, O. Bengone, and O. Eriksson (2003). Initial and final state effects in the x-ray absorption process of La1-xSrxMnO3. Phys. Rev. B, 68:235109 X P. E. Roy, C. Andersson, R. Gunnarsson, O. Karis, Z. Ivanov, and P. Svedlindh (2004). Interface magnetic properties of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 thin films. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 272-276:1207-1209 XI O. Wessely, P. Roy, D. Aberg, C. Andersson, S. Edvardsson, O. Karis, B. Sanyal, P. Svedlindh, M. I. Katsnelson, R. Gunnarsson, O. Bengone and, O. Eriksson (2004). Final state effects in the x-ray absorption spectra of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3. J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 272-276:1780-1781 Contributions to micromagnetic standard problems Pierre E. Roy and Peter Svedlindh (2006). Micromagnetic standard problem no. 4. Issued by the Center for Theoretical and Computational Materials Sci- ence (CTMS), National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Mi- cromagnetic Modeling Activity Group. Results can be viewed at their micro- magnetics website. http://www.ctcms.nist.gov/ rdm/mumag.html. Reprints were made with permission from the publishers. 6 Contents 1 Introduction . 11 2 Micromagnetics . 13 2.1 Energy terms . 14 2.1.1 Exchange energy . 14 2.1.2 Magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy . 15 2.1.3 Magnetostatic energy and domains . 15 2.1.4 Zeeman energy . 18 2.1.5 Thermal energy . 19 2.2 The effective field . 19 2.3 Micromagnetic length scales . 20 2.4 Magnetization dynamics . 21 3 Numerical technique . 23 3.1 Discretization . 23 3.2 The effective field and its discretization . 24 3.3 Codes used in this thesis . 26 4 Illustrative numerical experiments . 29 4.1 Standard µMAG problem no. 3 . 29 4.2 Standard µMAG problem no. 4 . 32 4.3 Thermal fluctuations . 37 5 Experimental techniques . 41 5.1 Sample preparation . 41 5.2 Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) . 41 5.2.1 Principles of MFM imaging . 42 5.2.2 Magnetic interactions between tip and sample . 43 5.3 Microwave reflection method . 44 6 Magnetic vortices; statics and dynamics . 47 6.1 The SV state . 48 6.1.1 SV statics in circular and elliptical cylinders . 48 6.1.2 SV dynamics in circular cylinders . 50 6.1.3 SV dynamics in elliptical cylinders . 55 6.2 Two vortex (2V) state . 61 6.2.1 2V statics in elliptical cylinders . 61 6.2.2 2V dynamics in elliptical cylinders . 62 6.3 Aspect ratio dependence of the resonance frequencies . 69 7 Implementation of possible application of patterned magnetic thin films ............................................... 71 7.1 Principle of operation . 71 8 Conclusions and Outlook . 77 8.1 Conclusions . 77 8.1.1 Numerical experiments . 77 8.1.2 Magnetic vortex dynamics . 77 8.1.3 Application of magnetic thin film elements . 78 8.2 Outlook . 78 9 Sammanfattning på svenska . 81 10 Acknowledgements . 85 Bibliography . 87 8 List of Important Symbols A: Exchange stiffness constant Ed: Demagnetization energy Eex: Exchange energy c Ek : Cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy u Ek : Uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy EZ: Zeeman energy F: Force H : Magnetic field (often used as the applied field in the text) h: Reduced magnetic field HApp: Applied magnetic field He: Effective field he: Reduced effective field Hex: Exchange field Hd: Demagnetizing field Hk: Anisotropy field Hz: Zeeman field kB: Boltzmann constant Kc1: First cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant Kc2: Second cubic magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant Km: Magnetostatic energy density constant Ku1: First uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant Ku2: Second uniaxial magnetocrystalline anisotropy constant 9 L: Dot thickness M : Magnetization Ms: Saturation magnetization m: Reduced magnetization ↔ N: Demagnetizing tensor p1,2: Core polarization (cores 1 and 2) R: Dot radius r: Position t: Time V: Volume X0: Vortex equilibrium position α: Damping parameter ∆t: Discretization time step γ0: Gyromagnetic ratio κx,y: Spring constants µ0: Permeability in vacuum φd: Magnetic scalar potential ξ: Dynamic vortex displacement 10 1. Introduction Ever since the first experiments by Barkhausen in 1919 [1], Sixtus and Tonks in 1931 [2], and later the direct imaging by Bitter [3, 4] (the originator of the Bitter pattern) and the works by Hamos and Thiessen [5], the existence of magnetic domains is an experimental fact, thus proving the domain con- cept that was already conjectured by Weiss as far back as in 1907 [6]. The interpretation of the domain images was, however, not well understood at the early stages mainly due to damaged sample surfaces and the use of compara- bly rough powders for imaging. Originally, domains were merely postulated in order to give a mechanism for demagnetization. A more detailed attempt for a theoretical description came in 1935 by Landau and Lifshitz [7], who used the concept of domain walls that had previously been suggested by Langmuir [2, 8] and put into a quantum mechanical form by Bloch [9]. In their paper they presented a classical calculation of a domain wall in which the sponta- neous magnetization is of constant magnitude but where the direction of the magnetization varies continuously with position (which is really the seed to the field of micromagnetics). Landau and Lifshitz were also able to show that minimization of the total energy gives rise to flux-closure domains and that the stray field energy (a term that previously had been much neglected) plays a decisive role in forming the equilibrium domain structure. The further devel- opment of this continuum approach was mainly performed by William Fuller Brown, who was greatly inspired by the work of Landau and Lifshitz and who coined the name micromagnetics [10, 11, 12, 13]. Experimentally, the work really showing the correspondence between the existing domain theories and experimental observations was presented in 1949 by Williams, Bozorth and Shockley [14] using well oriented and carefully prepared crystals in combi- nation with well dispersed magnetic colloids. The same year, Kittel wrote a review of domain theory and the up-to-date experiments at that time with his own further additions to the theory [15]. It seems that all this really opened up the floodgates to the research in this field, resulting in a vast body of pre- viously unconcieved magnetic microstructures (see the book by Hubert and Schafer¨ [16]). Since these times, a large set of experimental tools have been developed for the imaging of magnetic microstructures, such as for