DOCSLIB.ORG

Basics of Space Flight ( Pdfdrive.Com ).Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Basics of Space Flight Dave Doody August 11, 2011 ii Cover illustrations: The background is an infrared view, at 3.6 and 4.5 microns wavelength, of a colony of hot, young stars in the Orion nebula, from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope. Arbitrary colors represent the invisible infrared wavelengths. Image (PIA-13005) courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech. The rocket is a Titan IVB/Centaur carrying the Cassini Saturn orbiter and its at- tached Huygens Titan probe. Launch occurred at 4:43 a.m. EDT October 15, 1997, from Cape Canaveral Air Station. Image (PIA-01050) courtesy NASA/JPL/KSC. Inserts to the lower left of rocket: Leftmost is a view of the Sun using data from the Solar & Heliospheric Observatory spacecraft, displayed by the JHelioviewer visu- alization software (www.jhelioviewer.org). Center image combines Magellan radar imaging and altimetry data in a view of volcanoes “Innini” and “Hathor” in the southern hemisphere of Venus. From image (P-42385) courtesy of the Magellan Science Team at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory Multimission Image Processing Laboratory. Rightmost: NASA/JPL 70-meter Deep Space Station at Goldstone, California. View looking toward the northeast. Courtesy NASA/JPL-Caltech. Basics of Space Flight JPL Clearance #11-1594 Prepared with LATEX from public-domain content at www.jpl.nasa.gov/basics. Subject content is in the public domain and may be copied without permission. Please acknowledge source as the above website when copying. Cover design by David Hinkle, JPL, copyright © 2011 California Institute of Technology; all rights reserved. Preface and index copyright © 2011 Dave Doody; all rights reserved. The work was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Adminis- tration. This free-downloadable PDF is available at the above URL. Paperback hardcopy version is available where books are sold: ISBN-13: 978-0615476018 ISBN-10: 0615476015 Contents Preface: About this PDF 1 Acknowledgements 3 Introduction 5 IENVIRONMENT 7 1 The Solar System 9 2 Reference Systems 41 3 Gravitation and Mechanics 57 4 Interplanetary Trajectories 71 5 Planetary Orbits 79 6 Electromagnetic Phenomena 85 II FLIGHT PROJECTS 103 7 Mission Inception Overview 105 8 Experiments 113 9 Spacecraft Classification 123 iii 10 Telecommunications 139 11 Typical Onboard Systems 153 12 Typical Science Instruments 183 13 Spacecraft Navigation 197 III FLIGHT OPERATIONS 205 14 Launch Phase 207 15 Cruise Phase 221 16 Encounter Phase 229 17 Extended Operations Phase 243 18 Deep Space Network 249 IV REFERENCE 263 Units of Measure 265 Glossary 269 Index 287 List of Figures 1.1 GeocentricSystemofTychoBrahe . 9 1.2 Galaxy M100 . 12 1.3 TheSuninEUV......................... 15 1.4 HeliopauseandBowshock. 20 1.5 L.L.OrionisBowshock(HST) . 21 iv LIST OF FIGURES v 1.6 VanAllenBelts ......................... 24 1.7 TerrestrialPlanetDistances. 26 1.8 Jupiter’s Volcanic Moon Io . 28 1.9 Saturn’s Moon Titan . 28 1.10 Geysers on Saturn’s Moon Enceladus . 29 1.11 Saturn’s Rings . 29 1.13 CrescentPhase ......................... 30 1.12 Jovian Planet Distances . 31 1.14 Conjunctions, Elongations, Opposition . 32 1.15 Asteroid 433 Eros . 33 1.16 Main Belt Asteroids . 34 1.17 Comet Capture and Orbit . 37 1.18 Components of a Comet . 38 1.19 1966 Leonid Meteors . 39 2.1 Longitude and Latitude . 41 2.2 TerrestrialCo¨ordinatesGrid. 42 2.3 Precession of Earth’s Axis Over 26,000 Years . 44 2.4 Movement of Earth’s Rotational Poles 2001 to 2006 . 45 2.5 TheCelestialSphere....................... 47 2.6 TheEclipticPlane........................ 47 2.7 DSN Station with HA-DEC Mount . 49 2.8 DSN Station with AZ-EL Mount . 49 2.9 DSN Station with X-Y Mount . 50 2.10 TRM + RTLT = ERT . 52 2.11 SOEExcerpt........................... 55 3.1 EllipseFoci ........................... 57 3.2 WaterBottleRocket ...................... 60 3.3 Schematic of Bipropellant Rocket . 61 3.4 DeLavalNozzle ......................... 62 3.5 AlbertandElsaEinstein..................... 63 3.6 Motion and Acceleration in Orbit . 64 3.7 Kepler’sSecondLaw ...................... 65 3.8 Cannon Atop Mountain . 66 3.9 AddingEnergy.......................... 67 3.10 Orbital Energy . 67 4.1 Earth to Mars via Least Energy Orbit . 72 4.2 EarthtoVenusviaLeastEnergyOrbit . 73 vi LIST OF FIGURES 4.3 Voyager Flight Path . 74 4.4 Voyager2Gravity-AssistVelocity . 75 4.5 Planet-RelativeSpeeds . 76 4.6 Sun-RelativeSpeeds....................... 76 4.7 DeepSpaceOne......................... 77 5.1 Lagrange Points . 83 6.1 The Galaxy M45 . 85 6.2 Radio Image of Jupiter . 88 6.3 DarkAbsorptionLinesintheSun’sSpectrum . 92 6.4 Hydrogen-Alpha Solar Absorption . 94 6.5 Relative Radial Motion & Doppler Shift . 95 6.6 DifferencedDoppler ....................... 95 6.7 Reflectance Angle of RF Waves . 96 6.8 CassegrainReflector....................... 97 6.9 NestedGlancing-IncidenceMirrors . 98 6.10 Refraction . 99 6.11 Refraction in Earth’s Atmosphere . 100 6.12 Wave Phases . 100 7.1 Full Mission Life Cycle . 107 7.2 Galileo in Environmental Test . 109 7.3 Spacecraft Right Ascension . 111 8.1 Steve Squyres Waiting for Rover Egress . 113 8.2 Radio Science Atmospheric Occultation Experiment . 118 8.3 LunarGravityFieldSurvey . 119 9.1 Voyager . 124 9.2 Galileo..............................125 9.3 Huygens . 126 9.4 Pathfinder ............................127 9.5 DeepSpace2 ..........................127 9.6 Sojourner . 128 9.7 Spitzer..............................128 9.8 Tracking&DataRelaySatelliteSystem . 129 10.1 DSN Hydrogen Maser . 142 10.2 1-Way, 2-Way Coherent, 2-Way and 3-Way Coherent. 143 10.3 Deep Space 1 Beacon . 148 LIST OF FIGURES vii 11.3 Stardust Spacecraft Bus . 154 11.1 Cassini Spacecraft –Y side . 155 11.2 Cassini Spacecraft +Y side . 156 11.4 Excerpt from Cassini SOE . 158 11.5 Cassini CDS . 158 11.6 Cassini CDS . 160 11.7 3-Axis Stabilized Cassini . 161 11.8 CassiniStellarReferenceUnit. 163 11.9 Ulysses Prime-focus HGA . 165 11.10 MGS Articulated HGA . 165 11.11 LGA Atop HGA . 166 11.12 Travelling-Wave Tube Amplifier . 167 11.13 Solar Cell . 169 11.14 MGS Solar Arrays . 169 11.15 Cutaway view of Cassini’s RTGs . 171 11.16 Cassini’s RTG Shades . 171 11.17 Messenger’s OSRs . 173 11.18 Thermal Control Louvers . 174 11.19 Stardust with Shields . 175 11.20 Magellan Rocket Engine Module . 175 11.21 Cassini’s Propulsion Module Subsystem . 176 11.22 Magellan Flight System Block Diagram . 178 11.23 Solar Sail . 179 12.1 Galileo Heavy Ion Counter. 184 12.2 APXS on Sojourner Rover. 185 12.3 CRS on Voyager. 185 12.4 CAPS on Cassini. 186 12.5 CDA on Cassini. 186 12.6 Voyager’s MAG Boom . 187 12.7 CCD Imaging System . 188 12.8 Detail of a CCD Detector. 189 12.9 PPR on Galileo. 192 12.10 Synthetic Aperture Radar . 194 12.11 MOLA on Mars Global Surveyor. 195 14.1 Centaur Upper Stage . 208 14.2 Delta II Launch Vehicle . 209 14.3 Titan IV Launch Vehicle . 209 14.4 Atlas V Launch Vehicle . 210 14.5 Ariane V Launch Vehicle . 211 14.6 Proton Launch Vehicle . 211 14.7 Soyuz Launch Vehicle . 211 14.8 Space Shuttle Atlantis . 212 14.9 Pegasus Launch Vehicle . 212 14.10 Launch Complex 41 . 213 14.11 Making use of Earth’s Motion . 214 14.12 Cassini-Huygens to Launch Vehicle Adapter . 216 14.13 MRO Hoisted to Atlas V . 218 15.1 Messenger . 221 15.2 CassiniAcesDuringEarlyCruise . 223 15.3 Creating Products for Use in Flight Ops . 225 15.4 Station 14 Pointing its 70 m Aperture East . 226 16.1 Planetary Flyby . 230 16.2 Orbit Insertion . 232 16.3 Stellar Ring Occultation . 234 16.4 Venus Gravity Field vs. Topography . 236 16.5 Galileo’s Jupiter Atmospheric Probe. 237 16.6 Magellan’s Atmospheric Plunge. 237 16.7 JPL’s Surveyor 3 on the Moon. 238 16.8 Stardust . 240 17.1 Gaps in Magellan’s Venus Data . 243 17.2 Pioneer 10 and 11 . 246 18.1 34 m Deep Space Stations . 249 18.2 70 m Deep Space Station 43 in Canberra . 254 18.3 34 m Deep Space Station 15 in California . 255 18.4 Microwave Mirrors in Beam Waveguide DSS . 256 18.5 Intercontinental DSN Array . 257 18.6 The BWG Microwave System . 258 18.7 The SPC Signal and Data Paths . 260 viii LIST OF TABLES ix List of Tables 1.1 Approximate Typical Conditions Within Our Galaxy . 13 1.2 LighttimeandDistance...................... 14 1.3 SolarSystemTemperatureReference . ..
Recommended publications
  • Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The

    Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander Macdonald, Editor in The

    EARLY DRAFT - NASAWATCH.COM/SPACEREF.COM Preface Patrick Besha, Editor Alexander MacDonald, Editor In the next decade, NASA will seek to expand humanity’s presence in space beyond the International Space Station in low-Earth orbit to a new habitation platform orbiting the moon. By the late 2020’s, astronauts will live and work far deeper in space than ever before. The push to cis-lunar orbit is part of a stepping-stone approach to extend our reach to Mars and beyond. This decision to explore ever farther destinations is a familiar pattern in the history of American space exploration. Another major pattern with historical precedent is the transition from public sector exploration to private sector commercialization. After the government has developed and demonstrated a capability in space, whether it be space-based communications or remote sensing, the private sector has realized its market potential. As new companies establish a presence, the government withdraws from the market. In 2015, we are once again at a critical stage in the development of space. The most successful long-term human habitation in space, orbiting the Earth continuously since 1998, is the International Space Station. Currently at the apex of its capabilities and the pinnacle of state-of-the-art space systems, it was developed through the investments and labors of over a dozen nations and is regularly re-supplied by cargo delivery services. Its occupants include six astronauts and numerous other organisms from Earth’s ecosystems from bacteria to plants to rats. Research is conducted on the spacecraft from hundreds of organizations worldwide ranging from academic institutions to large industrial companies and from high-tech start-ups to high-school science classes.
  • An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destination

    An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destination

    The Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study: An Ongoing Effort to Identify Near-Earth Asteroid Destinations for Human Explorers Presented to the 2013 IAA Planetary Defense Conference Brent W. Barbee∗, Paul A. Abelly, Daniel R. Adamoz, Cassandra M. Alberding∗, Daniel D. Mazanekx, Lindley N. Johnsonk, Donald K. Yeomans#, Paul W. Chodas#, Alan B. Chamberlin#, Victoria P. Friedensenk NASA/GSFC∗ / NASA/JSCy / Aerospace Consultantz NASA/LaRCx / NASA/HQk / NASA/JPL# April 16th, 2013 Introduction I Near-Earth Objects (NEOs) are asteroids and comets with perihelion distance < 1.3 AU I Small, usually rocky bodies (occasionally metallic) I Sizes range from a few meters to ≈ 35 kilometers I Near-Earth Asteroids (NEAs) are currently candidate destinations for human space flight missions in the mid-2020s th I As of April 4 , 2013, a total of 9736 NEAs have been discovered, and more are being discovered on a continual basis 2 Motivations for NEA Exploration I Solar system science I NEAs are largely unchanged in composition since the early days of the solar system I Asteroids and comets may have delivered water and even the seeds of life to the young Earth I Planetary defense I NEA characterization I NEA proximity operations I In-Situ Resource Utilization I Could manufacture radiation shielding, propellant, and more I Human Exploration I The most ambitious journey of human discovery since Apollo I NEAs as stepping stones to Mars 3 NHATS Background I NASA's Near-Earth Object Human Space Flight Accessible Targets Study (NHATS) (pron.: /næts/) began in September of 2010 under the auspices of the NASA Headquarters Planetary Science Mission Directorate in cooperation with the Advanced Exploration Systems Division of the Human Exploration and Operations Mission Directorate.
  • Download This Article in PDF Format

    Download This Article in PDF Format

    A&A 583, A85 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526795 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics Reaching the boundary between stellar kinematic groups and very wide binaries III. Sixteen new stars and eight new wide systems in the β Pictoris moving group F. J. Alonso-Floriano1, J. A. Caballero2, M. Cortés-Contreras1,E.Solano2,3, and D. Montes1 1 Departamento de Astrofísica y Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Facultad de Ciencias Físicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain e-mail: [email protected] 2 Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC PO box 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain 3 Spanish Virtual Observatory, ESAC PO box 78, 28691 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain Received 19 June 2015 / Accepted 8 August 2015 ABSTRACT Aims. We look for common proper motion companions to stars of the nearby young β Pictoris moving group. Methods. First, we compiled a list of 185 β Pictoris members and candidate members from 35 representative works. Next, we used the Aladin and STILTS virtual observatory tools and the PPMXL proper motion and Washington Double Star catalogues to look for companion candidates. The resulting potential companions were subjects of a dedicated astro-photometric follow-up using public data from all-sky surveys. After discarding 67 sources by proper motion and 31 by colour-magnitude diagrams, we obtained a final list of 36 common proper motion systems. The binding energy of two of them is perhaps too small to be considered physically bound. Results. Of the 36 pairs and multiple systems, eight are new, 16 have only one stellar component previously classified as a β Pictoris member, and three have secondaries at or below the hydrogen-burning limit.
  • Photometric Study of Two Near-Earth Asteroids in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog

    Photometric Study of Two Near-Earth Asteroids in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog

    University of North Dakota UND Scholarly Commons Theses and Dissertations Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects January 2020 Photometric Study Of Two Near-Earth Asteroids In The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog Christopher James Miko Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/theses Recommended Citation Miko, Christopher James, "Photometric Study Of Two Near-Earth Asteroids In The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Moving Objects Catalog" (2020). Theses and Dissertations. 3287. https://commons.und.edu/theses/3287 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, and Senior Projects at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PHOTOMETRIC STUDY OF TWO NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS IN THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY MOVING OBJECTS CATALOG by Christopher James Miko Bachelor of Science, Valparaiso University, 2013 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of North Dakota in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Grand Forks, North Dakota August 2020 Copyright 2020 Christopher J. Miko ii Christopher J. Miko Name: Degree: Master of Science This document, submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree from the University of North Dakota, has been read by the Faculty Advisory Committee under whom the work has been done and is hereby approved. ____________________________________ Dr. Ronald Fevig ____________________________________ Dr. Michael Gaffey ____________________________________ Dr. Wayne Barkhouse ____________________________________ Dr. Vishnu Reddy ____________________________________ ____________________________________ This document is being submitted by the appointed advisory committee as having met all the requirements of the School of Graduate Studies at the University of North Dakota and is hereby approved.
  • Physical Properties of Near-Earth Asteroids

    Physical Properties of Near-Earth Asteroids

    Planet. Space Sci., Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 47-74, 1998 Pergamon N~I1998 Elsevier Science Ltd All rights reserved. Printed in Great Britain 00324633/98 $19.00+0.00 PII: SOO32-0633(97)00132-3 Physical properties of near-Earth asteroids D. F. Lupishko’ and M. Di Martino’ ’ Astronomical Observatory of Kharkov State University, Sumskaya str. 35, Kharkov 310022, Ukraine ‘Osservatorio Astronomic0 di Torino, I-10025 Pino Torinese (TO), Italy Received 5 February 1997; accepted 20 June 1997 rather small objects, usually of the order of a few kilo- metres or less. MBAs of such sizes are generally not access- ible to ground-based observations. Therefore, when NEAs approach the Earth (at distances which can be as small as 0.01-0.02 AU and sometimes less) they give a unique chance to study objects of such small sizes. Some of them possibly represent primordial matter, which has preserved a record of the earliest stages of the Solar System evolution, while the majority are fragments coming from catastrophic collisions that occurred in the asteroid main- belt and could provide “a look” at the interior of their much larger parent bodies. Therefore, NEAs are objects of special interest for sev- eral reasons. First, from the point of view of fundamental science, the problems raised by their origin in planet- crossing orbits, their life-time, their possible genetic relations with comets and meteorites, etc. are closely connected with the solution of the major problem of “We are now on the threshold of a new era of asteroid planetary science of the origin and evolution of the Solar studies” System.
  • Statistical Survey and Analysis of Photometric and Spectroscopic Data on Neas

    Statistical Survey and Analysis of Photometric and Spectroscopic Data on Neas

    Global Journal of Environmental Science and Research ISSN: 2349-7335 Volume 3, No. 2 (April – June 2016) STATISTICAL SURVEY AND ANALYSIS OF PHOTOMETRIC AND SPECTROSCOPIC DATA ON NEAS J. Rukmini1, G. Raghavendra2, S.A.Ahmed1, D. Shanti Priya1 and Syeda Azeem Unnisa3 1Department of Astronomy, Osmania University, Hyderabad 2Nizam College, Osmania University, Hyderabad 3Department of Environmental Science, Osmania University, Hyderabad ABSTRACT Studies on Near Earth Asteroids (NEAs) throw light on discoveries, identification, orbit prediction and civil alert capabilities, including potential asteroid impact hazards. Due to various new observational programs, the discovery rate of NEAs has drastically increased over the last few years. In this paper we present the statistical survey and analysis of fundamental parameters (derived from Photometric and Spectroscopic observations) of a large sample of NEAs from various databases like IAU Minor Planet Center, European Asteroid Research Node (E.A.R.N.), Near Earth Objects - Dynamic Site (NEODyS- 2), M4AST and SMASSMTT portals. We also discuss the characterization of NEAs on the basis of the correlations between the parameters studied from different observations and their physical implications in understanding the nature and physical properties of these objects. Keywords: NEOs; Apollo; Amor; Aten; Observations: Photometric, Spectroscopic. INTRODUCTION Johannes Schmidt proposed that asteroids repre- sented an arrested stage of planet formation which Asteroids are rocky and metallic objects which could not coalesce into a single large body. To- are assumed to be left over pieces from the early day around 700,000 asteroids have been discov- solar system, 4.6 billion years ago. Asteroids have ered with known orbits, giving insight into the been discovered within the solar system and are Asteroid Belt’s dynamic past.
  • Spacecraft Solar Cell Arrays

    Spacecraft Solar Cell Arrays

    NASA NASA SP-8074 SPACE VEHICLE DESIGN CRITERIA (GUIDANCE AND CONTROL) SPACECRAFT SOLAR CELL ARRAYS MAY 1971 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION c GUIDE TO THE USE OF THIS MONOGRAPH The purpose of this monograph is to organize and present, for effective use in design, the signifi- cant experience and knowledge accumulated in operational programs to date. It reviews and assesses current state-of-the-art design practices, and from them establishes firm guidance for achieving greater consistency in design, increased reliability in the end product, and greater efficiency in the design effort for conventional missions. The monograph is organized into three major sections that are preceded by a brief introduction and complemented by a set of references. The State of the Art, Section 2, reviews and discusses the total design problem, and identifies which1 design elements are involved in successful design. It describes succinctly the current tech- nology pertaining to these elements. When detailed information is required, the best available references are cited. This section serves as a survey of the subject that provides background material and prepares a proper technological base for the Design Criteria and Recommended Practices. The Design Criteria, shown in Section 3, state clearly and briefly what rule, guide, limitation, or standard must be considered for each essential design element to ensure successful design. The Design Criteria can serve effectively as a checklist of rules for the project manager to use in guiding a design or in assessing its adequacy. The Recommended Practices, as shown in Section 4, state how to satisfy each of the criteria.
  • 2001 Mars Odyssey 1/24 Scale Model Assembly Instructions

    2001 Mars Odyssey 1/24 Scale Model Assembly Instructions

    2001 Mars Odyssey 1/24 Scale Model Assembly Instructions This scale model of the 2001 Mars Odyssey spacecraft is designed for anyone interested, although it might be inappropriate for children younger than about ten years of age. Children should have adult supervision to assemble the model. Copyright (C) 2002 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Permission for commercial reproduction other than for single-school in- classroom use must be obtained from JPL Commercial Programs Office. 1 SETUP 1.1 DOWNLOAD AND PRINT o You'll need Adobe Acrobat Reader software to read the Parts Sheet file. You'll find instructions for downloading the software free of charge from Adobe on the web page where you found this model. o Download the Parts file from the web page to your computer. It contains paper model parts on several pages of annotated graphics. o Print the Parts file with a black & white printer; a laser printer gives best results. It is highly recommended to print onto card stock (such as 110 pound cover paper). If you can't print onto card stock, regular paper will do, but assembly will be more difficult, and the model will be much more fragile. In any case, the card stock or paper should be white. The Parts file is designed for either 8.5x11-inch or A4 sheet sizes. o Check the "PRINTING CALIBRATION" on each Parts Sheet with a ruler, to be sure the cm or inch scale is full size. If it isn't, adjust the printout size in your printing software.
  • Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

    Preparation of Papers for AIAA Technical Conferences

    DUKSUP: A Computer Program for High Thrust Launch Vehicle Trajectory Design & Optimization Spurlock, O.F.I and Williams, C. H.II NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH, 44135 From the late 1960’s through 1997, the leadership of NASA’s Intermediate and Large class unmanned expendable launch vehicle projects resided at the NASA Lewis (now Glenn) Research Center (LeRC). One of LeRC’s primary responsibilities --- trajectory design and performance analysis --- was accomplished by an internally-developed analytic three dimensional computer program called DUKSUP. Because of its Calculus of Variations-based optimization routine, this code was generally more capable of finding optimal solutions than its contemporaries. A derivation of optimal control using the Calculus of Variations is summarized including transversality, intermediate, and final conditions. The two point boundary value problem is explained. A brief summary of the code’s operation is provided, including iteration via the Newton-Raphson scheme and integration of variational and motion equations via a 4th order Runge-Kutta scheme. Main subroutines are discussed. The history of the LeRC trajectory design efforts in the early 1960’s is explained within the context of supporting the Centaur upper stage program. How the code was constructed based on the operation of the Atlas/Centaur launch vehicle, the limits of the computers of that era, the limits of the computer programming languages, and the missions it supported are discussed. The vehicles DUKSUP supported (Atlas/Centaur, Titan/Centaur, and Shuttle/Centaur) are briefly described. The types of missions, including Earth orbital and interplanetary, are described. The roles of flight constraints and their impact on launch operations are detailed (such as jettisoning hardware on heating, Range Safety, ground station tracking, and elliptical parking orbits).
  • So, Has Voyager 1 Left the Solar System? Scientists Face Off Cosmic-Ray Fluctuations Could Mean the Craft Has Exited the Sun's Magnetic Field

    So, Has Voyager 1 Left the Solar System? Scientists Face Off Cosmic-Ray Fluctuations Could Mean the Craft Has Exited the Sun's Magnetic Field

    NATURE | NEWS So, has Voyager 1 left the Solar System? Scientists face off Cosmic-ray fluctuations could mean the craft has exited the Sun's magnetic field. Ron Cowen 21 March 2013 A space physicist this week suggests that NASA’s venerable Voyager 1 spacecraft has become the first vehicle to venture beyond the heliosphere — the magnetic bubble created by the Sun — but other mission scientists disagree. William Webber of New Mexico State University in Las Cruces bases the claim on signals recorded last August by the Voyager 1 cosmic-ray subsystem — a device that he helped to build — along with his late colleague and study co-author Francis McDonald. JPL-Caltech/NASA Voyager 1 recorded a sudden drop in cosmic rays The instrument recorded a dramatic drop in the intensity of the cosmic rays trapped last August, a possible sign that it had left the in the Sun’s magnetic field and a concomitant rise in that of rays generated by more Sun's sphere of influence. distant reaches of the Galaxy. That pattern indicates that Voyager 1 has travelled beyond the Sun’s magnetic influence and is no longer being shielded from galactic cosmic rays, the researchers report in a study published online this week in Geophysical Research Letters1. But if one is to believe a press release issued by NASA on 20 March (the same day the report was published), the two researchers jumped the gun. Other Voyager scientists who analysed the same data last autumn reiterate what they said then: the cosmic-ray data indicate that Voyager 1 is in a transition zone within the outer part of the heliosphere, but until a dramatic change in magnetic-field intensity and direction is detected, the craft remains firmly within the Sun’s magnetic sphere of influence.
  • General Disclaimer One Or More of The

    General Disclaimer One Or More of The

    General Disclaimer One or more of the Following Statements may affect this Document This document has been reproduced from the best copy furnished by the organizational source. It is being released in the interest of making available as much information as possible. This document may contain data, which exceeds the sheet parameters. It was furnished in this condition by the organizational source and is the best copy available. This document may contain tone-on-tone or color graphs, charts and/or pictures, which have been reproduced in black and white. This document is paginated as submitted by the original source. Portions of this document are not fully legible due to the historical nature of some of the material. However, it is the best reproduction available from the original submission. Produced by the NASA Center for Aerospace Information (CASI) (NASA-CR-16S983) RESEARCH 2N PARTICLES AND V83-18777 FIELDS Semiannual Status Report, 1 Apr. - 30 Sep. 1982 (California Inst. of Tech.) 12 p HC A02/MF A01 CSCL 22A Unclas G3/12 02974 SPACE RADIATION LABORATORY CAIZORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 91125 SEMI-ANNUAL STATUS REPORT for f i NA71ONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADIGNMU71ON Grant NGR 05-002-160 • "RESEARCH IN PARTICLES AND FIELDS" for 1 April 1982 - 30 September 1882 R. E. Vogt, Principal Investigator A. BuMogton, Coinvestigator 1^1 F ; ^ R L. Davis, Jr., Coinvestigator E.-C. Stone, Coinvestigator RES I ^ lurr ACM DEPT. *'NASA Technical Officer: Dr. A. G. Opp, Physics and Astronomy Programs _a_ 1 ^ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page t . Cosmic Rays and Astrophysical Plasmas 3 1.1 Activities in Support of or in Preparation for Spacecraft EnwIments 3 1.2 on NASA Spacecraft 4 2.
  • The Isis3 Bundle Adjustment for Extraterrestrial Photogrammetry

    The Isis3 Bundle Adjustment for Extraterrestrial Photogrammetry

    ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume I-4, 2012 XXII ISPRS Congress, 25 August – 01 September 2012, Melbourne, Australia JIGSAW: THE ISIS3 BUNDLE ADJUSTMENT FOR EXTRATERRESTRIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY K. L. Edmundson*, D. A. Cook, O. H. Thomas, B. A. Archinal, R. L. Kirk Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, AZ, USA, 86001 - [email protected] Commission IV, WG IV/7 KEY WORDS: Bundle Adjustment, Estimation, Extraterrestrial, Planetary, Space ABSTRACT: The Integrated Software for Imagers and Spectrometers (ISIS) package was developed by the Astrogeology Science Center of the U.S. Geological Survey in the late 1980s for the cartographic and scientific processing of planetary image data. Initial support was implemented for the Galileo NIMS instrument. Constantly evolving, ISIS has since added support for numerous missions, including most recently the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, MESSENGER, and Dawn missions, plus support for the Metric Cameras flown onboard Apollo 15, 16, and 17. To address the challenges posed by extraterrestrial photogrammetry, the ISIS3 bundle adjustment module, jigsaw, is evolving as well. Here, we report on the current state of jigsaw including improvements such as the implementation of sparse matrix methods, parameter weighting, error propagation, and automated robust outlier detection. Details from the recent processing of Apollo Metric Camera images and from recent missions such as LRO and MESSENGER are given. Finally, we outline future plans for jigsaw, including the implementation of sequential estimation; free network adjustment; augmentation of the functional model of the bundle adjustment to solve for camera interior orientation parameters and target body parameters of shape, spin axis position, and spin rate; the modeling of jitter in line scan sensors; and the combined adjustment of images from a variety of platforms.