DOCSLIB.ORG

Detailed Species Account from Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Detailed Species Account from Birds in Europe: Population Estimates, Trends and Conservation Status Birds in Europe – Thrushes, robins and chats Country Breeding pop. size (pairs) Year(s) Trend Mag.% References Erithacus rubecula Albania 10,000 – 20,000 02 (0) (0–19) EUROPEAN ROBIN Andorra (700 – 1,000) 99–01 (+) (0–19) 1,3 Armenia 3300 – 5,000 99–02 0 0–19 E Austria (700,000 – 1,400,000) 98–02 (0) (0–19) Non-SPEC (1994: 4) Status Secure Azerbaijan (50,000 – 100,000) 96–00 (0) (0–19) Criteria — Belarus 1,200,000 – 1,500,000 97–02 0 0–19 European IUCN Red List Category — Belgium 100,000 – 250,000 01–02 (0) (0–19) 1 Criteria — Bosnia & HG (50,000 – 100,000) 90–00 (0) (0–19) Bulgaria 1,500,000 – 3,500,000 96–02 0 0–9 Global IUCN Red List Category — Croatia (500,000 – 1,000,000) 02 (–) (20–29) 16 Criteria — Czech Rep. 600,000 – 1,200,000 00 0 0–19 Denmark 200,000 – 300,000 00 F 50–79 12 Faroe Is. 0 – 2 92–93 (0) (0–19) Erithacus rubecula is a widespread breeder across most of Europe, which constitutes Estonia 250,000 – 500,000 98 0 0–19 1 >75% of its global breeding range. Its European breeding population is extremely Finland 1,200,000 – 3,300,000 98–02 +65 France (3,000,000 – 15,000,000) 98–02 +684,3 large (>43,000,000 pairs), and was stable between 1970–1990. Although the species Georgia Present 03 ? – declined in Sweden during 1990–2000, these losses were compensated for by increases Germany 2,500,000 – 4,000,000 95–99 0 0–19 Greece (50,000 – 100,000) 95–00 (0) (0–19) in the sizeable populations in France and the United Kingdom, and the species Hungary 255,000 – 400,000 99–02 0 0–19 19 underwent a small increase overall. Consequently, it is evaluated as Secure. Rep. Ireland 1,000,000 – 2,500,000 88–91 0 0–19 Italy (1,000,000 – 3,000,000) 03 (0) (0–19) Latvia 700,000 – 1,000,000 90–00 (0) (0–19) 23,18 Liechtenstein (1,000 – 2,500) 98–00 (0) (0–19) Lithuania (800,000 – 1,500,000) 99–01 (0) (0–19) 20 No. of pairs ≤ Luxembourg 15,000 – 20,000 02 0 0–19 525,000 Macedonia (300,000 – 700,000) 90–00 (0) (0–19) ≤ 1,600,000 Malta 1 – 2 90–02 + 0–19 1 Moldova 32,000 – 38,000 90–00 0 0–19 ≤ 3,600,000 Netherlands 350,000 – 450,000 98–00 +331 Norway (500,000 – 1,500,000) 90–02 (0) (0–19) ≤ Poland 1,000,000 – 1,500,000 00–02 0 0–19 23 13,000,000 Portugal (50,000 – 500,000) 02 (0) (0–19) Azores Present 02 ? – Present Madeira Present 02 ? – Extinct Romania 1,854,000 – 2,670,000 00–02 0 0–19 48 Erithacus Russia 10,000,000 – 15,000,000 90–00 (0) (0–19) 122 rubecula Serbia & MN 600,000 – 800,000 90–02 0 0–19 1,29,155,172a, 67a,78,225,227 Slovakia 500,000 – 1,000,000 90–99 0 0–19 Slovenia 700,000 – 1,000,000 00 (0) (0–19) Spain (1,200,000 – 3,000,000) 92 ? – 10,13 Canary Is. (2,500 – 10,000) 97–03 ? – 28,25 Sweden 2,500,000 – 5,000,000 99–00 –20 Switzerland 450,000 – 600,000 93–96 0 0–19 Turkey (100,000 – 400,000) 01 (0) (0–19) Ukraine 1,650,000 – 2,000,000 90–00 0 0–19 UK 5,895,000 – 5,895,000 00 +315,31 Gibraltar 0–2 00 0 0–19 Total (approx.) 43,000,000 – 83,000,000 Overall trend Small increase Breeding range >8,000,000 km2 Gen. length. <3.3 % Global pop. 75–94 (See p. 200, bottom, for data quality graph) Country Breeding pop. size (pairs) Year(s) Trend Mag.% References Luscinia luscinia Belarus 160,000 – 200,000 97–02 0 0–19 THRUSH NIGHTINGALE Bulgaria (0 – 5) 96–02 ? – Czech Rep. 0–5 00 0 0–19 Non-SPECE (1994: 4) Status Secure Denmark (10,000 – 50,000) 00 – 30–49 Criteria — Estonia 40,000 – 80,000 98 + 20–29 1 Finland 15,000 – 20,000 98–02 –10 European IUCN Red List Category — Georgia Present 03 ? – Criteria — Germany 9,600 – 36,000 95–99 – 20–29 Global IUCN Red List Category — Hungary 0 – 10 95–02 – 20–49 Latvia 50,000 – 150,000 90–00 + 30–49 23,16,2 Criteria — Lithuania (40,000 – 70,000) 99–01 (0) (0–19) 20 Moldova 40,000 – 50,000 90–00 0 0–19 Luscinia luscinia is a widespread summer visitor to north-eastern Europe, which Netherlands 0–2 98–00 ? – 1 Norway 300 – 1,000 90–03 0 0–19 constitutes >50% of its global breeding range. Its European breeding population is Poland 200,000 – 400,000 00–02 0 0–19 23 very large (>3,700,000 pairs), and was stable between 1970–1990. Although there Romania 86,000 – 120,000 00–02 + 0–19 48 Russia 2,500,000 – 5,000,000 90–00 (0) (0–19) 122 were declines in some marginal populations during 1990–2000, key populations in Slovakia 1,000 – 1,500 90–99 0 0–19 the core of the breeding range—notably Russia—were stable, and the species remained Sweden 20,000 – 50,000 99–00 –38 stable overall. Consequently, it is evaluated as Secure. Ukraine 520,000 – 680,000 90–00 0 0–9 Total (approx.) 3,700,000 – 6,900,000 Overall trend Stable Breeding range >4,000,000 km2 Gen. length. <3.3 % Global pop. 50–74 No. of pairs ≤ 110,000 ≤ 290,000 ≤ 600,000 93 6 ≤ 3,600,000 2000 population 36 60 4 Present 1990 population Extinct Data quality (%) – Luscinia luscinia Luscinia unknown poor medium good luscinia 1990–2000 trend 72 27 1970–1990 trend 37 56 7 2000 population 26 60 14 1990 population 52 34 12 Data quality (%) – Erithacus rubecula (see p. 200, top) unknown poor medium good 1990–2000 trend 3 36 29 32 1970–1990 trend 55 25 18 200 http://birdsineurope.birdlife.org Prunella mod-Sylvia sarda.p65 200 19/10/2004, 17:13.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • American Robin
    American Robin DuPage Birding Club, 2020 American Robin Appearance A chunky, heavy-bodied bird with a relatively small dark head. Sexually dimorphic, meaning the male and female look different. American Robins are a uniform dark gray with a brick red breast. Female Male Females are a lighter gray with a lighter breast. Males tend to be darker with a brighter red breast. Males are larger than females. Photos: Elmarie Von Rooyen (left), Jackie Tilles (right) DuPage Birding Club, 2020 2 American Robin Appearance American Robins are a medium-size bird with a length of about ten inches. They are so common that they are a good bird to compare size with when you come across an unknown bird. Is the bird bigger than an American Robin or smaller than an American Robin? Judging the size of a bird is very helpful in identifying an unknown bird. Chart: The Cornell Lab, All About Birds https://www.allaboutbirds.org/guide/American_Robin/id DuPage Birding Club, 2020 3 American Robin Appearance Juvenile American Robins have a speckled breast with a tint of rusty red. Photos: Natalie McFaul DuPage Birding Club, 2020 4 American Robin Sounds From The Cornell Lab of Ornithology: https://www.birds.cornell.edu/home/ SONGS The musical song of the American Robin is a familiar sound of spring. It’s a string of 10 or so clear whistles assembled from a few often- repeated syllables, and often described as cheerily, cheer up, cheer up, cheerily, cheer up. The syllables rise and fall in pitch but are delivered at a steady rhythm, with a pause before the bird begins singing again.
    [Show full text]
  • Luscinia Luscinia)
    Ornis Hungarica 2018. 26(1): 149–170. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2018-0010 Exploratory analyses of migration timing and morphometrics of the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia) Tibor CSÖRGO˝ 1 , Péter FEHÉRVÁRI2, Zsolt KARCZA3, Péter ÓCSAI4 & Andrea HARNOS2* Received: April 20, 2018 – Revised: May 10, 2018 – Accepted: May 20, 2018 Tibor Csörgo,˝ Péter Fehérvári, Zsolt Karcza, Péter Ócsai & Andrea Harnos 2018. Exploratory analyses of migration timing and morphometrics of the Thrush Nightingale (Luscinia luscinia). – Ornis Hungarica 26(1): 149–170. DOI: 10.1515/orhu-2018-0010 Abstract Ornithological studies often rely on long-term bird ringing data sets as sources of information. However, basic descriptive statistics of raw data are rarely provided. In order to fill this gap, here we present the seventh item of a series of exploratory analyses of migration timing and body size measurements of the most frequent Passerine species at a ringing station located in Central Hungary (1984–2017). First, we give a concise description of foreign ring recoveries of the Thrush Nightingale in relation to Hungary. We then shift focus to data of 1138 ringed and 547 recaptured individuals with 1557 recaptures (several years recaptures in 76 individuals) derived from the ringing station, where birds have been trapped, handled and ringed with standardized methodology since 1984. Timing is described through annual and daily capture and recapture frequencies and their descriptive statistics. We show annual mean arrival dates within the study period and present the cumulative distributions of first captures with stopover durations. We present the distributions of wing, third primary, tail length and body mass, and the annual means of these variables.
    [Show full text]
  • Progress in the Development of an Eurasian-African Bird Migration Atlas
    CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/COP13/Inf.20 MIGRATORY 10 February 2020 SPECIES Original: English 13th MEETING OF THE CONFERENCE OF THE PARTIES Gandhinagar, India, 17 - 22 February 2020 Agenda Item 25 PROGRESS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN EURASIAN-AFRICAN BIRD MIGRATION ATLAS (Submitted by the European Union of Bird Ringing (EURING) and the Institute of Avian Research) Summary: The African-Eurasian Bird Migration Atlas is being developed under the auspices of CMS in the framework of a Global Animal Migration Atlas, of which it constitutes a module. The African-Eurasian Bird Migration Atlas is being developed and compiled by the European Union of Bird Ringing (EURING) under a Project Cooperation Agreement (PCA) between the CMS Secretariat and the Institute of Avian Research, acting on behalf of EURING. The development of the African-Eurasian Bird Migration Atlas is funded with the contribution granted by the Government of Italy under the Migratory Species Champion Programme. This information document includes a progress report on the development of the various components of the project. The project is expected to be completed in 2021. UNEP/CMS/COP13/Inf.20 Eurasian-African Bird Migration Atlas progress report February 2020 Stephen Baillie1, Franz Bairlein2, Wolfgang Fiedler3, Fernando Spina4, Kasper Thorup5, Sam Franks1, Dorian Moss1, Justin Walker1, Daniel Higgins1, Roberto Ambrosini6, Niccolò Fattorini6, Juan Arizaga7, Maite Laso7, Frédéric Jiguet8, Boris Nikolov9, Henk van der Jeugd10, Andy Musgrove1, Mark Hammond1 and William Skellorn1. A report to the Convention on Migratory Species from the European Union for Bird Ringing (EURING) and the Institite of Avian Research, Wilhelmshaven, Germany 1. British Trust for Ornithology, Thetford, IP24 2PU, UK 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Territoriality As a Paternity Guard in the European Robin, Erithacus Rubecula
    ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2000, 60, 165–173 doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1442, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on ARTICLES Territoriality as a paternity guard in the European robin, Erithacus rubecula JOE TOBIAS & NAT SEDDON Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge (Received 29 June 1999; initial acceptance 29 July 1999; final acceptance 18 March 2000; MS. number: 6273) To investigate the relative importance of paternity defences in the European robin we used behavioural observations, simulated intrusions and temporary male removal experiments. Given that paired males did not increase their mate attendance, copulation rate or territory size during the female’s fertile period, the most frequently quoted paternity assurance strategies in birds were absent. However, males with fertile females sang and patrolled their territories more regularly, suggesting that territorial motivation and vigilance were elevated when the risk of cuckoldry was greatest. In addition, there was a significant effect of breeding period on response to simulated intrusions: residents approached and attacked freeze-dried mounts more readily in the fertile period. During 90-min removals of the pair male in the fertile period, neighbours trespassed more frequently relative to prefertile and fertile period controls and appeared to seek copulations with unattended females. When replaced on their territories, males immediately increased both song rate and patrolling rate in comparison with controls. We propose that male robins sing to signal their presence, and increase their territorial vigilance and aggression in the fertile period to protect paternity. 2000 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour Despite the apparent social monogamy of the majority of Thryothorus nigricapillus: Levin 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Evolutionary History of the Bluethroat (Luscinia Svecica)
    Molecular Ecology (2003) 12, 3069–3075 doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01981.x RecentBlackwell Publishing Ltd. evolutionary history of the bluethroat (Luscinia svecica) across Eurasia ROBERT M. ZINK,* SERGEI V. DROVETSKI,† SOPHIE QUESTIAU,‡ IGOR V. FADEEV,§ EVGENIY V. NESTEROV,§ MICHAEL C. WESTBERG* and SIEVERT ROHWER¶ *J. F. Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA, †Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior, University of Minnesota, St Paul, MN 55108, USA, ‡Ecologie Animale, Université d’Angers, Belle-Beille, 2, boulevard Lavoisier, F-49045 Angers cedex, France, §State Darwin Museum, 57 Vavilova Street, Moscow 117292, Russia, ¶Burke Museum and Department of Zoology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195–3010, USA Abstract We analysed mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) sequences from 154 bluethroats (Luscinia svecica) sampled at 21 sites throughout much of their Eurasian range. A previously reported, single base-pair mtDNA difference between L. s. svecica and L. s. namnetum was inconsistent upon expanded geographical sampling. A significant FST value (0.29) and an isolation-by-distance effect show the existence of geographical differentiation. Phyloge- netic analysis of haplotypes revealed northern and southern groups, although lineage sort- ing is incomplete. There was no geographical structure to the haplotype tree within groups, and currently recognized subspecies were not supported. A minimum evolution tree based on pairwise mtDNA genetic distances among average samples showed the same two broadly distributed northern and southern groups. These groups abut in the centre of the latitudinal range, and were possibly isolated by forest that developed and spread westward over the last 15 000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Status and Distribution of Thrush Nightingale Luscinia Luscinia and Common Nightingale L
    Sandgrouse31-090402:Sandgrouse 4/2/2009 11:21 AM Page 18 On the status and distribution of Thrush Nightingale Luscinia luscinia and Common Nightingale L. megarhynchos in Armenia VASIL ANANIAN INTRODUCTION In the key references on the avifauna of the Western Palearctic and former Soviet Union, the breeding distributions of Common Luscinia megarhynchos and Thrush Nightingales L. luscinia in the Transcaucasus (Georgia, Armenia and Azerbaijan) are presented inconsistently, especially for the latter species. These sources disagree on the status of Thrush Nightingale in the area, thus Vaurie (1959), Cramp (1988) and Snow & Perrins (1998) considered it breeding in the Transcaucasus, while Dementiev & Gladkov (1954), Sibley & Monroe (1990) and Stepanyan (2003) do not. Its distribu- tion in del Hoyo et al (2005) is mapped according to the latter view, but they note the species’ presence in Armenia during the breeding season. Several other publications Plate 1. Common Nightingale Luscinia megarhynchos performing full territorial song, Vorotan river gorge, c15 consider that the southern limit of Thrush km SSW of Goris town, Syunik province, Armenia, 12 May Nightingale’s Caucasian breeding range is 2005. © Vasil Ananian in the northern foothills of the Greater Caucasus mountains (Russian Federation), while the Transcaucasus is inhabited solely by Common Nightingale (Gladkov et al 1964, Flint et al 1967, Ivanov & Stegmann 1978, Vtorov & Drozdov 1980). Thrush Nightingale in Azerbaijan was classified as ‘accidental’ by Patrikeev (2004). The author accepted that the species had possibly nested in the past and referred to old summer records by GI Radde from the Karayasi forest in the Kura–Aras (Arax) lowlands, but Patrikeev found only Common Nightingale there in the late 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • Siberian Blue Robin Larvivora Cyane from the Barak Valley of Assam with a Status Update for India
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338137338 Siberian Blue Robin Larvivora cyane from the Barak Valley of Assam with a status update for India Article in Indian BIRDS · December 2019 CITATIONS READS 0 7 2 authors: Rejoice Gassah Vijay Anand Ismavel Makunda Christian Hospital 4 PUBLICATIONS 0 CITATIONS 22 PUBLICATIONS 12 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Neglected health problems in rural India View project Biodiversity Documentation View project All content following this page was uploaded by Vijay Anand Ismavel on 24 December 2019. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Correspondence 123 peninsular India (Grimmett et al. 2011; Rasmussen & Anderton minY=11.103753465762485&env.maxX=93.01342361450202&env.maxY=12.31963 2012; eBird 2019). This species is a common winter visitor to 3103994705&zh=true&gp=true&ev=Z&mr=on&bmo=1&emo=1&yr=cur&byr=2019 Myanmar, Thailand, Laos, and Tonkin (Robson 2008). &eyr=2019. [Accessed on: 19 January 2019.] DeCandido, R., Subedi, T., Siponen, M., Sutasha, K., Pierce, A., Nualsri, C., & Round, P. D., 2013. Flight identification of Milvus migrans lineatus ‘Black-eared’ Kite and Milvus migrans govinda ‘Pariah’ Kite in Nepal and Thailand. BirdingASIA 20: 32–36. Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., & Inskipp, T., 2011. Birds of the Indian Subcontinent. 2nd ed. London: Oxford University Press & Christopher Helm. Pp. 1–528. Rasmussen, P. C., & Anderton, J. C., 2012. Birds of South Asia: the Ripley guide: field guide. 2nd ed. Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • First Images in the Wild of Blackthroat Luscinia Obscura, Asia's Most
    BirdingASIA 15 (2011): 17–19 17 LITTLE-KNOWN ASIAN BIRD First images in the wild of Blackthroat Luscinia obscura, Asia’s most enigmatic robin WEI QIAN & HE YI Background probably a female from Baihe Nature Reserve, The Blackthroat Luscinia obscura is known to breed Sichuan, on 3 June 2007 (Anderson 2007). only in the mountains of south-west China, where Additionally, a few captive birds, assumed to have there are a few scattered records from Sichuan, been caught in the vicinity of Chengdu, have Gansu and Shaanxi, together with even fewer appeared in Chengdu bird market (Wang 2004). presumed non-breeding records from Yunnan All other records are from Thailand and presumed (southern China) and northern Thailand. It is an to be either wintering birds or passage migrants extremely poorly known species classified as (BirdLife International 2001). Vulnerable because it is inferred to have a small, declining population as a result of destruction of Observations temperate forest within its breeding area as well On the morning of 2 May 2011, we visited Sichuan as habitat loss in its likely wintering areas (BirdLife University to observe and photograph migrating International 2001, 2011). birds in a small patch of wood and shrubbery in Since its description in 1891, there have only the south-eastern corner of the campus. At about been nine records from China, including some 09h20 a bird abruptly flew into the shrubbery, uncertain ones. These records comprise one each which we quickly located and identified as a male from Ganshu and Shaanxi, two from Yunnan, Blackthroat Luscinia obscura. We continued to presumed to be during migration, and four from observe it until about 17h20 when we left and Sichuan, all detailed in BirdLife International obtained what we believe to be the first images of (2001), and a recent sight record of a male and this species in the wild (Plates 1 & 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Acoustic Pattern Recognition of Nightingale (Luscinia Megarhynchos) Recordings by Citizens
    Research Ideas and Outcomes 6: e50233 doi: 10.3897/rio.6.e50233 Case Study Evaluation of acoustic pattern recognition of nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) recordings by citizens Marcel Stehle‡,§, Mario Lasseck ‡, Omid Khorramshahi‡‡, Ulrike Sturm ‡ Museum für Naturkunde Berlin Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Science, Berlin, Germany § Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development, Eberswalde, Germany Corresponding author: Ulrike Sturm ([email protected]) Reviewed v1 Received: 17 Jan 2020 | Published: 24 Feb 2020 Citation: Stehle M, Lasseck M, Khorramshahi O, Sturm U (2020) Evaluation of acoustic pattern recognition of nightingale (Luscinia megarhynchos) recordings by citizens. Research Ideas and Outcomes 6: e50233. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.6.e50233 Abstract Acoustic pattern recognition methods introduce new perspectives for species identification, biodiversity monitoring and data validation in citizen science but are rarely evaluated in real world scenarios. In this case study we analysed the performance of a machine learning algorithm for automated bird identification to reliably identify common nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) in field recordings taken by users of the smartphone app Naturblick. We found that the performance of the automated identification tool was overall robust in our selected recordings. Although most of the recordings had a relatively low confidence score, a large proportion of the recordings were identified correctly. Keywords pattern recognition, sound recognition, species identification, mobile app, citizen science © Stehle M et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
    [Show full text]
  • The Song Structure of the Siberian Blue Robin Luscinia [Larvivora] Cyane and a Comparison with Related Species
    Ornithol Sci 16: 71 – 77 (2017) ORIGINAL ARTICLE The song structure of the Siberian Blue Robin Luscinia [Larvivora] cyane and a comparison with related species Vladimir IVANITSKII1,#, Alexandra IVLIEVA2, Sergey GASHKOV3 and Irina MAROVA1 1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Biology, 119899 Moscow Leninskie Gory, Moscow, Moscow 119899, Russian Federation 2 M.F. Vladimirskii Moscow Regional Research Clinical Institute, Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation 3 Tomsk State University-Zoology Museum, Tomsk, Tomsk, Russian Federation ORNITHOLOGICAL Abstract We studied the song syntax of the Siberian Blue Robin Luscinia cyane, a small insectivorous passerine of the taiga forests of Siberia and the Far East. Males SCIENCE have repertoires of 7 to 14 (mean 10.9±2.3) song types. A single song typically con- © The Ornithological Society sists of a short trill comprised of from three to six identical syllables, each of two to of Japan 2017 three notes; sometimes the trill is preceded by a short single note. The most complex songs contain as many as five or six different trills and single notes. The song of the Siberian Blue Robin most closely resembles that of the Indian Blue Robin L. brunnea. The individual repertoires of Siberian Blue Robin, Common Nightingale L. megarhynchos and Thrush Nightingale L. luscinia contain groups of mutually associ- ated song types that are sung usually one after another. The Siberian Blue Robin and the Common Nightingale perform them in a varying sequence, while Thrush Nightin- gale predominantly uses a fixed sequence of song types. The distinctions between the song syntax of Larvivora spp. and Luscinia spp. are discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 74/Thursday, April 16, 2020/Notices
    21262 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 74 / Thursday, April 16, 2020 / Notices acquisition were not included in the 5275 Leesburg Pike, Falls Church, VA Comment (1): We received one calculation for TDC, the TDC limit would not 22041–3803; (703) 358–2376. comment from the Western Energy have exceeded amongst other items. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Alliance, which requested that we Contact: Robert E. Mulderig, Deputy include European starling (Sturnus Assistant Secretary, Office of Public Housing What is the purpose of this notice? vulgaris) and house sparrow (Passer Investments, Office of Public and Indian Housing, Department of Housing and Urban The purpose of this notice is to domesticus) on the list of bird species Development, 451 Seventh Street SW, Room provide the public an updated list of not protected by the MBTA. 4130, Washington, DC 20410, telephone (202) ‘‘all nonnative, human-introduced bird Response: The draft list of nonnative, 402–4780. species to which the Migratory Bird human-introduced species was [FR Doc. 2020–08052 Filed 4–15–20; 8:45 am]‘ Treaty Act (16 U.S.C. 703 et seq.) does restricted to species belonging to biological families of migratory birds BILLING CODE 4210–67–P not apply,’’ as described in the MBTRA of 2004 (Division E, Title I, Sec. 143 of covered under any of the migratory bird the Consolidated Appropriations Act, treaties with Great Britain (for Canada), Mexico, Russia, or Japan. We excluded DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR 2005; Pub. L. 108–447). The MBTRA states that ‘‘[a]s necessary, the Secretary species not occurring in biological Fish and Wildlife Service may update and publish the list of families included in the treaties from species exempted from protection of the the draft list.
    [Show full text]
  • Bird Flu Research at the Center for Tropical Research by John Pollinger, CTR Associate Director
    Center for Tropical Research October 2006 Bird Flu Research at the Center for Tropical Research by John Pollinger, CTR Associate Director Avian Influenza Virus – An Overview The UCLA Center for Tropical Research (CTR) is at the forefront of research and surveillance efforts on avian influenza virus (bird flu or avian flu) in wild birds. CTR has led avian influenza survey efforts on migratory landbirds in both North America and Central Africa since spring 2006. We have recently been funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to conduct a large study in North, Central, and South America on the effects of bird migration and human habitat disturbance on the distribution and transmission of bird flu. These studies take advantage of our unique collaboration with the major bird banding station networks in the Americas, our extensive experience in avian field research in Central Africa, and UCLA’s unique resources and expertise in infectious diseases though the UCLA School of Public Health and its Department of Epidemiology. CTR has ongoing collaborations with four landbird monitoring networks: the Monitoring Avian Productivity and Survivorship (MAPS) network, the Monitoring Avian Winter Survival (MAWS) network, and the Monitoreo de Sobrevivencia Invernal - Monitoring Overwintering Survival (MoSI) network, all led by the Institute for Bird Populations (IBP), and the Landbird Migration Monitoring Network of the Americas (LaMMNA), led by the Redwood Sciences Laboratory (U.S. Forest Service). Bird flu has shot to the public’s consciousness with the recent outbreaks of a highly virulent subtype of avian influenza A virus (H5N1) that has recently occurred in Asia, Africa, and Europe.
    [Show full text]