Exceptional in Vivo Catabolism of Neurodegeneration-Related Aggregates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Rotifers of Spanish Reservoirs: Ecological, Systematical and Zoogeographical Remarks
91 THE ROTIFERS OF SPANISH RESERVOIRS: ECOLOGICAL, SYSTEMATICAL AND ZOOGEOGRAPHICAL REMARKS Jordi de Manuel Barrabin Departament d'Ecologia, Universitat de Barcelona. Avd. Diagonal 645,08028 Barcelona. Spain,[email protected] ABSTRACT This article covers the rotifer data from a 1987/1988 survey of one hundred Spanish reservoirs. From each species brief infor- mation is given, focused mainly on ecology, morphology, zoogeography and distribution both in Spain and within reservoirs. New autoecological information on each species is also established giving conductivity ranges, alkalinity, pH and temperature for each. Original drawings and photographs obtained on both optical and electronic microscopy are shown of the majority of the species found. In total one hundred and ten taxa were identified, belonging to 101 species, representing 20 families: Epiphanidae (1): Brachionidae (23); Euchlanidae (1); Mytilinidae (1 ): Trichotriidae (3): Colurellidae (8); Lecanidae (1 5); Proalidae (2); Lindiidae (1); Notommatidae (5); Trichocercidae (7); Gastropodidae (5); Synchaetidae (1 1); Asplanchnidae (3); Testudinellidae (3); Conochiliidae (5):Hexarthridae (2); Filiniidae (3); Collothecidae (2); Philodinidae (Bdelloidea) (I). Thirteen species were new records for the Iberian rotifer fauna: Kerutella ticinensis (Ehrenberg); Lepadella (X.) ustucico- la Hauer; Lecane (M.) copeis Harring & Myers; Lecane tenuiseta Harring: Lecane (M.) tethis Harring & Myers; Proales fal- laciosa Wulfert; Lindia annecta Harring & Myers; Notommatu cerberus Hudson & Gosse; Notommata copeus Ehrenberg: Resticula nyssu Harring & Myers; Trichocerca vernalis Hauer; Gustropus hyptopus Ehrenberg: Collothecu mutabilis Hudson. Key Words: Rotifera, plankton, heleoplankton, reservoirs RESUMEN Este urticulo proporciona infiirmacicin sobre 10s rotferos hullados en el estudio 1987/88 realizudo sobre cien embalses espafioles. Para cnda especie se da una breve informacicin, ,fundamentalmente sobre aspectos ecoldgicos, morfoldgicos, zoo- geogriificos, asi como de su distribucidn en EspaAa y en los emldses. -
Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: an Updated Checklist
diversity Review Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: An Updated Checklist S. S. S. Sarma 1,* , Marco Antonio Jiménez-Santos 2 and S. Nandini 1 1 Laboratory of Aquatic Zoology, FES Iztacala, National Autonomous University of Mexico, Av. de Los Barrios No. 1, Tlalnepantla 54090, Mexico; [email protected] 2 Posgrado en Ciencias del Mar y Limnología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Mexico City 04510, Mexico; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-55-56231256 Abstract: A review of the Mexican rotifer species diversity is presented here. To date, 402 species of rotifers have been recorded from Mexico, besides a few infraspecific taxa such as subspecies and varieties. The rotifers from Mexico represent 27 families and 75 genera. Molecular analysis showed about 20 cryptic taxa from species complexes. The genera Lecane, Trichocerca, Brachionus, Lepadella, Cephalodella, Keratella, Ptygura, and Notommata accounted for more than 50% of all species recorded from the Mexican territory. The diversity of rotifers from the different states of Mexico was highly heterogeneous. Only five federal entities (the State of Mexico, Michoacán, Veracruz, Mexico City, Aguascalientes, and Quintana Roo) had more than 100 species. Extrapolation of rotifer species recorded from Mexico indicated the possible occurrence of more than 600 species in Mexican water bodies, hence more sampling effort is needed. In the current review, we also comment on the importance of seasonal sampling in enhancing the species richness and detecting exotic rotifer taxa in Mexico. Keywords: rotifera; distribution; checklist; taxonomy Citation: Sarma, S.S.S.; Jiménez-Santos, M.A.; Nandini, S. Rotifer Species Diversity in Mexico: 1. -
Thalassic Rotifers from the United States: Descriptions of Two New Species and Notes on the Effect of Salinity and Ecosystem on Biodiversity
diversity Article Thalassic Rotifers from the United States: Descriptions of Two New Species and Notes on the Effect of Salinity and Ecosystem on Biodiversity Francesca Leasi 1,* and Willem H. De Smet 2 1 Department of Biology, Geology and Environmental Science, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga, 615 McCallie Ave, Chattanooga, TN 37403, USA 2 Department of Biology. ECOBE, University of Antwerp, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] http://zoobank.org:pub:7679CE0E-11E8-4518-B132-7D23F08AC8FA Received: 26 November 2019; Accepted: 7 January 2020; Published: 13 January 2020 Abstract: This study shows the results of a rotifer faunistic survey in thalassic waters from 26 sites located in northeastern U.S. states and one in California. A total of 44 taxa belonging to 21 genera and 14 families were identified, in addition to a group of unidentifiable bdelloids. Of the fully identified species, 17 are the first thalassic records for the U.S., including Encentrum melonei sp. nov. and Synchaeta grossa sp. nov., which are new to science, and Colurella unicauda Eriksen, 1968, which is new to the Nearctic region. Moreover, a refined description of Encentrum rousseleti (Lie-Pettersen, 1905) is presented. During the survey, we characterized samples by different salinity values and ecosystems and compared species composition across communities to test for possible ecological correlations. Results indicate that both salinities and ecosystems are a significant predictor of rotifer diversity, supporting that biodiversity estimates of small species provide fundamental information for biomonitoring. Finally, we provide a comprehensive review of the diversity and distribution of thalassic rotifers in the United States. -
A Modern Approach to Rotiferan Phylogeny: Combining Morphological and Molecular Data
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 40 (2006) 585–608 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev A modern approach to rotiferan phylogeny: Combining morphological and molecular data Martin V. Sørensen ¤, Gonzalo Giribet Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Received 30 November 2005; revised 6 March 2006; accepted 3 April 2006 Available online 6 April 2006 Abstract The phylogeny of selected members of the phylum Rotifera is examined based on analyses under parsimony direct optimization and Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Species of the higher metazoan lineages Acanthocephala, Micrognathozoa, Cycliophora, and potential outgroups are included to test rotiferan monophyly. The data include 74 morphological characters combined with DNA sequence data from four molecular loci, including the nuclear 18S rRNA, 28S rRNA, histone H3, and the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I. The combined molecular and total evidence analyses support the inclusion of Acanthocephala as a rotiferan ingroup, but do not sup- port the inclusion of Micrognathozoa and Cycliophora. Within Rotifera, the monophyletic Monogononta is sister group to a clade con- sisting of Acanthocephala, Seisonidea, and Bdelloidea—for which we propose the name Hemirotifera. We also formally propose the inclusion of Acanthocephala within Rotifera, but maintaining the name Rotifera for the new expanded phylum. Within Monogononta, Gnesiotrocha and Ploima are also supported by the data. The relationships within Ploima remain unstable to parameter variation or to the method of phylogeny reconstruction and poorly supported, and the analyses showed that monophyly was questionable for the fami- lies Dicranophoridae, Notommatidae, and Brachionidae, and for the genus Proales. -
Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with Description of Ten New Species
Zootaxa 4028 (2): 151–196 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4028.2.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D47167E0-5C14-47F9-B4AA-9E906D13DF89 Rotifera from the Mediterranean Sea, with description of ten new species WILLEM H. DE SMET University of Antwerp, Department of Biology, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, B-2610 Wilrijk (Antwerpen), Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract . 152 Introduction . 152 Material and methods . 152 Results . 155 Description of new species . 156 Subclass MONOGONONTA Plate, 1889 . 156 Order PLOIMA Hudson & Gosse, 1886 . 156 Family BRACHIONIDAE Ehrenberg, 1838 . 156 Genus Notholca Gosse, 1886. 156 Notholca bythonoma sp. nov. 156 Family DICRANOPHORIDAE Harring, 1913 . 158 Genus encentrum Ehrenberg, 1838 . 158 Encentrum aluligerum sp. nov. 158 Encentrum foroiuliense sp. nov. 161 Encentrum loefgreni sp. nov. 164 Encentrum pugiodigitatum sp. nov. 166 Subgenus Tricellatum subgen. nov. 168 Encentrum (Tricellatum) uncinatoides sp. nov. et subgen. nov. 168 Paradicranophorus halophilus sp. nov. 170 Family LINDIIDAE Harring & Myers, 1924 . 172 Genus Lindia Dujardin, 1841 . 172 Lindia aequorea sp. nov. 172 Family NOTOMMATIDAE Hudson & Gosse, 1886 . 173 Genus Pleurotrocha Ehrenberg, 1830 . 173 Pleurotrocha fontanetoi sp. nov. 173 Family PROALIDAE Harring & Myers, 1924 . 176 Genus Proales Gosse, 1886 . 176 Proales francescae sp. nov. 177 Notes on selected taxa . 179 Genus Allodicranophorus gen. nov. 179 Genus Halolepadella gen. nov. 181 Rotaria laticeps Wulfert, 1942 . 184 Cephalodella sp. 184 Encentrum astridae Sørensen, 2001 . 184 Encentrum kutikovae De Smet & Chernyshev, 2006 . -
The Freshwater Fauna of the South Polar Region: a 140-Year Review
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Tasmania Open Access Repository Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania, Volume 151, 2017 19 THE FRESHWATER FAUNA OF THE SOUTH POLAR REGION: A 140-YEAR REVIEW. by Herbert J.G. Dartnall (with one text-figure, one table and one appendix) Dartnall, H.J.G. 2017 (6:xii): The freshwater fauna of the South Polar Region: A 140-year review. Papers and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 151: 19–57. https://doi.org/10.26749/rstpp.151.19 ISSN 0080-4703. Department of Biological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109 Australia. E-mail: [email protected] The metazoan fauna of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic freshwaters is reviewed. Almost 400 species, notably rotifers, tardigrades and crustaceans have been identified. Sponges, molluscs, amphibians, reptiles and fishes are absent though salmonid fishes have been successfully introduced on some of the sub-Antarctic islands. Other alien introductions include insects (Chironomidae) and annelid worms (Oligochaeta). The fauna is predominately benthic in habitat and becomes increasingly depauperate at higher latitudes. Endemic species are known but only a few are widely distributed. Planktonic species are rare and only one parasitic species has been noted. Keywords: freshwater, fauna, Antarctica, sub-Antarctic Islands, maritime Antarctic, continental Antarctica. INTRODUCTION included in this definition. While these cool-temperate islands have a similar verdant vegetation and numerous The first collections of Antarctic freshwater invertebrates water bodies they are warmer and some are vegetated with were made during the “Transit of Venus” expeditions woody shrubs and trees.] of 1874 (Brady 1875, 1879, Studer 1878). -
A Metadata Approach to Documenting Sex in Phylum Rotifera: Diapausing Embryos, Males, and Hatchlings from Sediments
A metadata approach to documenting sex in phylum Rotifera: diapausing embryos, males, and hatchlings from sediments Elizabeth J. Walsh, Linda May & Robert L. Wallace Hydrobiologia The International Journal of Aquatic Sciences ISSN 0018-8158 Volume 796 Number 1 Hydrobiologia (2017) 796:265-276 DOI 10.1007/s10750-016-2712-z 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer International Publishing Switzerland. This e- offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self-archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your article, please use the accepted manuscript version for posting on your own website. You may further deposit the accepted manuscript version in any repository, provided it is only made publicly available 12 months after official publication or later and provided acknowledgement is given to the original source of publication and a link is inserted to the published article on Springer's website. The link must be accompanied by the following text: "The final publication is available at link.springer.com”. 1 23 Author's personal copy Hydrobiologia (2017) 796:265–276 DOI 10.1007/s10750-016-2712-z ROTIFERA XIV Review Paper A metadata approach to documenting sex in phylum Rotifera: diapausing embryos, males, and hatchlings from sediments Elizabeth J. Walsh . Linda May . Robert L. Wallace Received: 12 November 2015 / Revised: 17 February 2016 / Accepted: 20 February 2016 / Published online: 9 May 2016 Ó Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016 Abstract We present a survey of the literature volume (*0.11–100 9 105 lm3) and have a varied documenting sexuality in monogonont rotifers, surface morphology (smooth to highly structured and including reports of diapausing embryos (DEs), males, ornamented). -
Phylum Rotifera Cuvier, 1817. In: Zhang, Z.-Q
Phylum Rotifera Cuvier, 1817 (2 classes)1,2, 3 Class Pararotatoria Sudzuki, 1964 (1 order) Order Seisonacea Wesenberg-Lund, 1899 (1 family) Family Seisonidae Wesenberg-Lund, 1899 (2 genera, 3 species) Class Eurotatoria De Ridder, 1957 (2 subclasses) Subclass Bdelloidea Hudson, 1884 (4 families) Family Adinetidae Hudson and Gosse, 1889 (2 genera, 20 species) Family Habrotrochidae Bryce, 1910 (3 genera, 152 species) Family Philodinavidae Harring, 1913 (3 genera, 6 species) Family Philodinidae Ehrenberg, 1838 (12 genera, 283 species) Subclass Monogononta Plate, 1889 (2 superorders) Superorder Pseudotrocha Kutikova, 1970 (1 order) Order Ploima Hudson and Gosse, 1886 (23 families)4 Family Asciaporrectidae De Smet, 2006 (1 genus, 3 species) Family Asplanchnidae Eckstein, 1883 (3 genera, 15 species) Family Birgeidae Harring and Myers, 1924 (1 genus, 1 species) Family Brachionidae Ehrenberg, 1838 (7 genera, 170 species)5 Family Clariaidae Kutikova, Markevich and Spiridonov, 1990 (1 genus, 1 species) Family Cotylegaleatidae De Smet, 2007 (1 genus, 1 species)6 Family Dicranophoridae Harring, 1913 (19 genera, 233 species)7 Family Epiphanidae Harring, 1913 (5 genera, 17 species)8 Family Euchlanidae Ehrenberg, 1838 (5 genera, 27 species) Family Gastropodidae Harring, 1913 (2 genera, 12 species) Family Ituridae Sudzuki, 1964 (1 genus, 6 species) Family Lecanidae Remane, 1933 (1 genus, 201 species)9 Family Lepadellidae Harring, 1913 (5 genera, 163 species) Family Lindiidae Harring and Myers, 1924 (1 genus, 16 species) Family Microcodidae Hudson and Gosse, 1886 (1 genus, 1 species) Family Mytilinidae Harring, 1913 (2 genera, 29 species) Family Notommatidae Hudson and Gosse, 1886 (19 genera, 280 species )10,11 Family Proalidae Harring and Myers, 1924 (4 genera, 55 species)12 Family Scaridiidae Manfredi, 1927 (1 genus, 7 species) Family Synchaetidae Hudson and Gosse, 1886 (3 genera, 56 species)13 1. -
Redescription of Lindia Gravitata with Comments on L. Tecusa (Rotifera: Monogononta: Lindiidae)
J. Mar. Biol. Ass. U.K. (2005), 85,1467^1473 Printed in the United Kingdom Redescription of Lindia gravitata with comments on L. tecusa (Rotifera: Monogononta: Lindiidae) Willem H. De Smet University of Antwerp, Campus Groenenborger, Department of Biology, Section of Polar Ecology, Limnology and Palaeobiology, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerpen, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] Lindia gravitata, previously considered a synonym of L. tecusa by several authors is redescribed. Body shape and trophi structure show that both species are closely related, and unequivocally di¡erentiated by e.g. toe shape, number of sensory papillae, and shape of subunci and epipharynx. Other related, but insu⁄ciently described congeners are listed. The diagnostic features of the subgenus Halolindia are discussed. INTRODUCTION During a study on psammon rotifers from the Eastern Scheldt (The Netherlands), specimens conforming to the Lindiidae is a small family of monogonont rotifers, concise description of L. gravitata were found. In this consisting of 15 valid species, mostly freshwater taxa, paper I redescribe the species, and present additional with only three of them occurring in marine or brackish information on the morphology and the results of the scan- environments (Segers, 2002; De Smet, in press). Besides ning electron microscopy (SEM) of the trophi of L. tecusa. these valid species, some nine taxa are considered species inquirendae in the recent revision by Segers (2002). Amongst them is Lindia gravitata (Lie-Pettersen, 1906), SYSTEMATICS described from two specimens collected in littoral Phylum ROTIFERA Cuvier, 1812 periphyton from a shallow water body on the west coast Class EUROTATORIA De Ridder, 1957 of Norway. -
Phylogeny of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta) – a Maximum Parsimony Analysis Based on Morphological Characters
Ó 2008 The Authors Accepted on 10 March 2008 Journal compilation Ó 2008 Blackwell Verlag, Berlin J Zool Syst Evol Res doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0469.2008.00482.x 1Institute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Department of Systematics and Evolutionary Biology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany; 2German Centre for Marine Biodiversity Research (DZMB), Senckenberg Research Institute, Wilhelmshaven, Germany Phylogeny of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta) – a maximum parsimony analysis based on morphological characters O. Riemann1,A.Kieneke1,2 and W. H. Ahlrichs1 Abstract This study presents the first phylogenetic analysis of Dicranophoridae (Rotifera: Monogononta), a species rich rotifer family of about 230 species currently recognized. It is based on a maximum parsimony analysis including 77 selected ingroup and three outgroup taxa and a total of 59 phylogenetically informative morphological characters. Character coding is based on personal investigation of material collected by the authors and an extensive survey of the literature. Apart from covering general body organization, character coding primarily relies on scanning electron microscopic preparations of the mastax jaw elements. Our study suggests monophyly of Dicranophoridae with a clade of Dicranophorus and Dorria as the sister taxon of all other dicranophorid species. Monophyly of Encentrum, the most species rich genus within Dicranophoridae, cannot be demonstrated. Within Dicranophoridae our study identifies the monophyletic taxa Caudosubbasifenestrata, Intramalleata, Praeuncinata and Proventriculata, each based on unambiguous character transformations evolved in their stem lineages. However, resolution within Praeuncinata and Proventriculata is very limited. Although some terminal clades within Praeuncinata and Proventriculata are recognized, basal splits remain obscure. Probably, other characters such as DNA sequence data are needed to further our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within these poorly resolved taxa. -
Annotated Checklist of the Rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with Notes on Nomenclature, Taxonomy and Distribution
ZOOTAXA 1564 Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution HENDRIK SEGERS Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand HENDRIK SEGERS Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution (Zootaxa 1564) 104 pp.; 30 cm. 31 August 2007 ISBN 978-1-86977-129-4 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-130-0 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2007 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2007 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 1564 © 2007 Magnolia Press SEGERS Zootaxa 1564: 1–104 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Annotated checklist of the rotifers (Phylum Rotifera), with notes on nomenclature, taxonomy and distribution HENDRIK SEGERS Belgian Biodiversity Platform, Freshwater Laboratory, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Vautierstraat 29, B - 1000 Brus- sels Belgium. E-mail: [email protected] Table of contents Abstract . 3 Introduction . 3 Approach . 4 Scope . 4 Future prospects . 9 Acknowledgements . 9 References . 10 Abstract Phylum Rotifera comprises about 2030 known species classified in three main groups, the marine Seisonida (3 species), the Monogononta (1570 species) and the unique, exclusively parthenogenetic Bdelloidea with 461 clonal species. -
SSS Sarma1 & Lakes. Consequentiy, The
Rev. Biol. Trop., 47 (Sup!. 1): 187-196, 1999 www.ucr.ac.cr Www.ots.ac.cr www.ots.duke.edu A survey on the rotifer (Rotifera) fauna of the Yucatan Peninsula (Mexico) S.S.S. Sarma1 & ManUel Elías-Gutiérrez2 I Universidad NacionalAutónoma de México, Campus IztacaIa(Biología) AP 314, CP 54000, Los Reyes, Tlalnepantla, Edo. de Mexico, Mexico. e-mai!: [email protected]. FAX: +52 (5) 623 1149 2 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. AP 424, Chetumal 77000, Quintana Roo, México. e-mail: [email protected] Received 14-1-1999. Corrected 12-I1I-1999. Accepted 12-IV-1999. Abstract. Taxonomic studies on the freshwater rotífers were conducted on samples collected from 12 localities in the south-central par! of Quintana Roo State (Yucatan Península, Mexíco) during 1997. The water bodies sampled ranged from small cenotes (carstic deep circular sinkholes) to temporary and permanent lagoons. Data on selected physical and cheroical variables of tbe waterbodies were also obtained. We recorded 102 rotifer species of which 15 are new to the fauna of Mexico. These are: Eosphora anfhadís, EOfhínia carogaensís, Lecane aeganea, Lecane grandis, Lecane haliclysfa, Lecane !/wlgarethae, Lecane rugosa, Lecane sibínll. Lecane spinulifera, Lecane uenoí, Lepadella donneri, Lepadella heterostyla, Macrochaetus IOllgipes, Proa les daphnicola, and Ptygura tacita. In this study, we present illustrations of all new records and comments on selected taxafrom a zoogeographical point of view. Keywords: Rotifer, Mexico, distribution, new record, taxonomy. Taxonomic studies on Mexican rotifers are of 78 species (Sarmaand Elías-Gutiérrez 1998). not many. Most of the studies are from the On the other hand, Rico-Martínez and Silva limnological point of view (Torres-Orozcoel al.