DOCSLIB.ORG

Subject Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Subject Index Subject Index Acromioclavicular separation 187 - -, pneumopericardium 166 -- -, - -, laceration 163 Adrenal trauma, calcification 134 - -, radionuclide scanning 111 -- -, - -, pneumatocele 163 - -, computerized tomography 136 Carotid-cavernous fistula 58 -- -, rib fracture 159 - -, hematoma 134-136 Catheters, emboli 171 -- -, - -, first rib 160 - -, intravenous urography 134 -, perforation 171 -- -, - -, lower ribs 160 - -, ultrasound 136 -, septicemia 171 -- -, - -, posterior ribs 160 Aneurysm 167 -, thrombosis 171 -- -, - -, subclavian artery 160 -, dissecting 58 Cephalohematoma, calcification 30 -- -, - -, upper ribs 160 -, intracranial 44 -, hyperostosis 30 -- -, shock lung 163-164 -, post-traumatic 57-58 -, radionuclide scanning 128 -- -, sternal fracture 160 Aorta, aneurysm 167 Cerebral contusion 53 -- -, tracheal injury -, dissection 167 - -, Radionuclide scanning 107 - --, - -, complete 162 -, laceration 167 -, edema 54 -- --, --, partial 162 -, rupture 167 Cervical spine injury, anomaly 64-45, Child abuse see battered child Artery, occlusion 59, 108, 110, 180 69 Clavicular fracture 160, 187-188 -, spasm 58 -- -, arteriography 70 - -, sternoclavicular joint dislo- -, stenosis 59 -- -, atlanto-occipital dislocation 66 cation 160 -, venous fistula 58 -- -, - instability 66 Coccyx injury 82 Aspiration, hydrocarbon 164 -- -, avulsion injury (clay Colon injury, blunt 156-157 -, fluid 163 shovellers) 72 - -, penetrating 156-157 -, foreign body 164 -- -, birth trauma 72 Computerized tomography, adrenal Athletic injury 192 - -, dislocation, atlanto-axial 67 injury 136 Avulsion injury 72, 73, 186, 192 - -, -, atlanto-occipital 66 - -, head injury 20, 34-57 --, -, facet bilateral 71 - -, renal injury 2 Barotrauma, related to respiratory - -, -, facet unilateral 71 - -, splenic injury 145 therapy 172 - -, embryology 64 Coracoclavicular separation 187 Battered child 192-195 - -, lateral meningocele 72 Cribriform plate fracture 93 - -, facial trauma 80 - -, ligaments 65 - -, head trauma 18 - -, flexion injury 70-72 Dental fracture 89 - -, isotopes, role in diagnosis 122 - -, -, lateral flexion injury 72 Diaphragmatic injury, blunt 169-170 - -, pancreas 132 - -, fracture, atlas 67 - -, penetrating 160-170 - -, rib fractures 160 - -, -, bursting 71 Dislocation, atlanto-occipital 66 - -, skeletal 192-195 - -, -, clay shovelers 72 -, cervical spine 67, 68, 71, 73 - -, stomach 148 - -, -, hangmans 78-79 - , clavicle 160 Birth trauma 122-188 - -, -, jefferson 66 -, hip 186 - -, adrenal hematoma 134-136 - -, -, odontoid 67-68 -, ossicles (middle ear) 100-101 - -, cervical spine 72 - -, -, pathological 74 -, sternoclavicular joint 187-188 - -, spleen 145 - -, -, teardrop 71 -, temporomandibular joint 97 Bladder trauma, contusion 12 - -, myelography 70 -, thoracolumbar spine 76-78 - -, cystogram 13-14 - -, pseudo subluxation 66 Diverticulum, post spine injury 72 - -, endoscopy 12 - -, rotary subluxation 65 Duodenum, hematoma 149, 154 - -, pelvic injury 12 Chest trauma, arteriography 160-167 -, perforation 149, 150 - -, rupture, intraperitoneal 12, 13 -- -, bronchial injury 162 - -, -, extraperitoneal 12, 13 -- -, - -, Bayonet deformity 162 Embolism, air 172 Bone injury see skeletal injury -- -, - -, Bronchial stenosis 162 -, fat 111, 163 Bowing (plastic) 180-181 -- -, chylothorax 162 -, pulmonary 111 Bronchial injury 162 -- -, emphysema (interstitial) 159 Emphysema (interstitial) 159, 170, Bronchopulmonary dysplasia 172 -- -, hemothorax 162 172 -- -, pneumothorax 160 Encephalocele (post-traumatic) 103 Caput succedaneum 29 -- -, -, tension 161 Endotracheal intubation 170 Cardiac contusion 166 -- -, pulmonary contusion 163 Esophagus, diverticulum 171 - -, hemopericardium 166 -- -, - -, hematoma 163 -, duplication 171 198 Subject Index Esophagus, foreign body 168-169 Galeazzi fracture 186-187 Intracerebral hematoma 38-39 -, pseudodi verticul urn 171 -, hemorrhage 34, 38 -, rupture 167-168 Head trauma, air studies 21, 33 Intrauterine trauma 188 -, stenosis 168 - -, aneurysm 57-58 Intravenous urogram, adrenal Extradural hematoma, cerebral - -, arterial spasm 58 trauma 134--136 50-53 - -, -, stenosis/occlusion 59 - -, liver trauma 138-139 - -, spinal 74 - -, arteriovenous fistula 58 - -, renal trauma 2 - -, radionuclide scan 105-107 - -, atrophy 32 - -, splenic trauma 145 - -, battered child 18 Intraventricular hemorrhage 39 Facial bone injury, dental fracture 89 - -, caput succedaneum 29 -- -, Le Fort's fracture 89 - -, carotid cavernous fistula 58 Kidney see renal - -- -, nasal fracture 87 - -, cephalohematoma 29 Kinky hair (Menke's syndrome) 195 -- -, - septum abscess 89 - -, cerebral contusion 53-54 Klippel-Feil syndrome 69 -- -, - -, hematoma 87 - -, -, edema 54 -- -, - -, saddle deformity 89 - -, -, infarction 60 Le Fort's fracture 89 -- -, orbital blowout fracture 89-91 - -, -, swelling 54--55 Leptomeningeal cyst 31 -- -, --, emphysema 91 - -, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea 27 Lipohemoarthrosis 181 -- - -, temporomandibular joint in- - -, cervical spine 18 Liver injury 138-143 volvement 89-93 - -, computerized tomography 20 - -, arteriography 139-141 -- -, trimalar (tripod) fracture 89 , contrecoup radionuclide - -, cholangiography 141-142 -, nerve Injury studies 108 - -, computerized tomography 143 -, trauma, battered child 86 - ,diastatic suture 19-23 - -, contusion 128-140 - -, cerebrospinal fluid rhinorrhea 87 - -, Dyke-Davidoff-Masson - -, hematobilia 138-140 - -, complex motion tomography 87 syndrome 19 - -, hematoma 138-140 - -, complications 97 - -, echoencephalography 21 - -, intravenous urography 138-139 --, dashboard injury 87 - -, foreign bodies 19 - -, laceration 138-140 - -, malocclusion 87 - -, - -, intracranial 33 - -, radiation injury, arteriography - -, zygomatic arch fractures 87 - -, - -, complications 33, 56-57 143 Foreign bodies, Bronchial 164 - -, head banging 33 - -, - -, radionuclide scanning 114 - -, esophageal 168-169 - -, hematoma, extradural 50-53 - -, radionuclide scanning 113 - -, intracranial 33, 56--57 - -, -, intracerebral 35, 39 - -, ultrasound 113 - -, tracheal 164 - -, -, subdural 24, 41 Lumbosacral spine injury, anomalies Fractures, cribriform plate 93 - -, hemorrhage, intracerebral 34 80 ~ -, dental 89 - -, -, intraventricular 39 -- -, radiation injury 83 -, elbow, anterior humeral line - -, -, subarachnoid 41 -- -, sclerotic pedicle 81 181-182 - -, herniation 18, 31, 33, 35 -- -, spondylolisthesis 80 -" lipohemoarthrosis 181 - -, hydrocephalus 42 -- -, spondylolysis 80 -, -, nursemaid's elbow 186 - -, hygroma, subdural 43 -- -, stress changes 80-81 -, epiphyseal 183-185 - -, infarct 32, 60 -, facial bones 87-91 - -, intracranial pressure 58 Mandible fracture 96-97 -, fatigue (stress) 80-81,124,191 - -, leptomeningeal cyst 31 - -, condylar neck fracture 96 -, Galeazzi 186-187 - -, lumbar puncture 18 Meningocele, cervical spine injury 72 -, incomplete - -, molding 28 -, temporal bone injury 103 -, -, greenstick 180-181 - -, mucocele 27 Menke's syndrome (kinky hair) 195 -, -, torus 180-181 - -, porencephaly 21, 31, 32 Monteggia fracture 186--187 -, Monteggia fracture 186--187 - -, radionuclide studies 21,105-111 Myelography, cervical spine -, neurotropic 190 - -, - -, intrathecal radiophar- injuries 70 -, pathological 189 maceuticals 22, 33, 93 -, thoracolumbar spine injuries 74 -, pelvis 12, 13, 192 - -, rhinorrhea 27 -, traumatic diverticulum (lateral -, ribs 159-160 - -, sinus air-fluid levels 19 meningocele) 72 -, skull 22 - -, varix subepicranial 60 -, -, depressed 19, 23-27 - -, venous sinus Nasal bone fracture 87 -, spine - -, - -, occlusion 59 -, septum abscess 89 -, -, cervical 66-74 - -, - -, superior sagittal compres- - -, hematoma 87 -, -, coccyx 82 sion 29 - -, saddle deformity 89 -, -, sacral 81--82 Hemopericardium 166 -, spine fracture 87 -,-, thoracolumbar 74--80 Hemothorax 161-162 -, stress (fatigue) 80--81, 124, 191 Odontoid agenesis 65 , tibia 183 Intestinal injury, large 156-157 Orbital emphysema 91 -, toddlers 18-' --, small 154--156 -, fracture, blowout 89-91 Subject Index 199 Os odontoideum 65 Renal injury, abscess 11 - -, isodense 46 Ossiculum terminale 65 - -, arteriography 4, 5-7 Subdural hygroma 43 Otorrhea, post-temporal bone - -, arteriovenous fistula 11 trauma 103 - -, calcification 11 Temporal bone trauma, classification -, radionuclide finding 109 - -, computerized tomography 2 97 - -, congenital abnormalities 2 -- -, conductive hearing loss 100 Palm thorn granuloma 126 - -, contusion 4 -- -, evaluation 97-99 Pancreatic injury 132-134 - -, fracture 6 -- -, facial nerve injury 100 - -, arteriography 134 - -, hypertension 11 -- -, neurosensory hearing loss 99 - -, blunt 132 - -, Iatrogenic 3, 11 -- -, sequelae 103 - -, calcification 132 - -, intravenous urogram 5, 6 Temporomandibular joint injury 89, - -, contusion 132 - -, pedicle 7 93-96 - -, fracture 132 - -, radionuclide scans 2, 5, 6, -- -, condylar neck fracture 96 - -, penetrating 132 117-121 -- -, tomography 96 - -, pseudocyst 132 Thoracolumbar spine injury, - -, radionuclide 117 Sacrum fracture 81-82 anatomy 74 - -, ultrasound 117 Scheuermann's disease 76 -- -, computerized tomography Pericardial effusion, radionuclide Shock lung 163-164 74-75 scan 111 - -, radionuclide scanning 112 -- -, congenital anomalies 78 Plastic bowing 180-181 Small intestine injury, blunt 154-156 -- -, extension injuries 78 Pneumatocele, following hydrocar- -- -, penetrating 154-156 -- -, extra-axial hematomas 74 bon inhalation 164 Skeletal injury, arteriography 180 -- -, flexion injuries 75 -, post-trauma 163 - -, arthrography 180
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Listen to the Associated Podcast Episodes: MSK: Fractures for the ABR Core Exam Parts 1-3, Available at Theradiologyreview.Com O
    MSK: Fractures for Radiology Board Study, Matt Covington, MD Listen to the associated podcast episodes: MSK: Fractures for the ABR Core Exam Parts 1-3, available Listen to associated Podcast episodes: ABR Core Exam, Multisystemic Diseases Parts 1-3, available at at theradiologyreview.com or on your favorite podcast directory. Copyrighted. theradiologyreview.com or on your favorite podcast direcry. Fracture resulting From abnormal stress on normal bone = stress Fracture Fracture From normal stress on abnormal bone = insuFFiciency Fracture Scaphoid Fracture site with highest risk for avascular necrosis (proximal or distal)? Proximal pole scaphoid Fractures are at highest risk For AVN Comminuted Fracture at the base oF the First metacarpal = Rolando Fracture Non-comminuted Fracture at base oF the First metacarpal = Bennett Fracture The pull oF which tendon causes the dorsolateral dislocation in a Bennett fracture? The abductor pollicus longus tendon. Avulsion Fracture at the base oF the proximal phalanx with ulnar collateral ligament disruption = Gamekeeper’s thumb. Same Fracture but adductor tendon becomes caught in torn edge oF the ulnar collateral ligament? Stener’s lesion. IF Stener’s lesion is present this won’t heal on its own so you need surgery. You shouldn’t image a Gamekeeper’s thumb with stress views because you can convert it to a Stener’s lesion. Image with MRI instead. Distal radial Fracture with dorsal angulation = Colle’s Fracture (C to D= Colle’s is Dorsal) Distal radial Fracture with volar angulation = Smith’s Fracture (S
    [Show full text]
  • Distal Humerus Lateral Condyle Fracture and Monteggia Lesion in a 3-Year Old Child : a Case Report
    Acta Orthop. Belg., 2008, 74, 542-545 CASE REPORT Distal humerus lateral condyle fracture and Monteggia lesion in a 3-year old child : A case report Rupen DATTANI, Surendra PATNAIK, Avdhoot KANTAK, Mohan LAL From East Surrey Hospital, Surrey, United Kingdom We describe a case of a Monteggia fracture disloca- DISCUSSION tion and an ipsilateral lateral humeral condyle frac- ture in a 3-year-old child. This is a rare combination Lateral condyle physeal fractures comprise 17% of injuries with no previously reported cases in the of all paediatric distal humerus fractures with a literature. This case emphasises that when a fracture peak incidence at 6 years of age (8). The mechanism is detected around an elbow there should be a high of injury is either an avulsion by the pull of the index of suspicion for other injuries in the region. common extensor origin owing to a varus stress Keywords : Monteggia fracture dislocation ; fracture of exerted on the extended elbow (‘pull off’ theory) or the humeral condyle ; elbow dislocation ; humerus a fall onto an extended upper extremity resulting fracture. in an axial load transmitted through the forearm, causing the radial head to impinge on the lateral head (‘push off’ theory) (2). Milch classified these fractures into two types (12). In type I injuries, the CASE REPORT fracture line courses lateral to the trochlea and into the capitello-trochlear groove representing a Salter- A 3-year-old boy presented to the emergency Harris type IV fracture : the elbow is usually stable department following a fall from a height onto his because the trochlea is intact.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Extremity Fractures
    Department of Rehabilitation Services Physical Therapy Standard of Care: Distal Upper Extremity Fractures Case Type / Diagnosis: This standard applies to patients who have sustained upper extremity fractures that require stabilization either surgically or non-surgically. This includes, but is not limited to: Distal Humeral Fracture 812.4 Supracondylar Humeral Fracture 812.41 Elbow Fracture 813.83 Proximal Radius/Ulna Fracture 813.0 Radial Head Fractures 813.05 Olecranon Fracture 813.01 Radial/Ulnar shaft fractures 813.1 Distal Radius Fracture 813.42 Distal Ulna Fracture 813.82 Carpal Fracture 814.01 Metacarpal Fracture 815.0 Phalanx Fractures 816.0 Forearm/Wrist Fractures Radius fractures: • Radial head (may require a prosthesis) • Midshaft radius • Distal radius (most common) Residual deformities following radius fractures include: • Loss of radial tilt (Normal non fracture average is 22-23 degrees of radial tilt.) • Dorsal angulation (normal non fracture average palmar tilt 11-12 degrees.) • Radial shortening • Distal radioulnar (DRUJ) joint involvement • Intra-articular involvement with step-offs. Step-off of as little as 1-2 mm may increase the risk of post-traumatic arthritis. 1 Standard of Care: Distal Upper Extremity Fractures Copyright © 2007 The Brigham and Women's Hospital, Inc. Department of Rehabilitation Services. All rights reserved. Types of distal radius fracture include: • Colle’s (Dinner Fork Deformity) -- Mechanism: fall on an outstretched hand (FOOSH) with radial shortening, dorsal tilt of the distal fragment. The ulnar styloid may or may not be fractured. • Smith’s (Garden Spade Deformity) -- Mechanism: fall backward on a supinated, dorsiflexed wrist, the distal fragment displaces volarly. • Barton’s -- Mechanism: direct blow to the carpus or wrist.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Presentation of a Type I Monteggia Fracture V K Peter
    88 CASE REPORT Emerg Med J: first published as 10.1136/emj.19.1.88 on 1 January 2002. Downloaded from Rare presentation of a type I Monteggia fracture V K Peter ............................................................................................................................. Emerg Med J 2002;19:88–89 DISCUSSION A rare case is reported of a Monteggia equivalent injury Any dislocation of the radial head with an ulnar fracture con- where a dislocation of the radial head is associated with stitutes a Monteggia lesion. Of the various classifications fracture of the distal third of the radius and ulna. The available, Bado’s is the one that is almost universally in use. mechanism, treatment and outcome are described. Type I: anterior dislocation of the radial head, fracture of the ulnar diaphysis at any level with anterior (volar) angulation. Type II: posterior or posterolateral dislocation of the radial head, fracture of the ulnar diaphysis with posterior (dorsal) CASE REPORT angulation. 12 year old boy fell backwards off a chair onto his Type III: lateral or anterolateral dislocation of the radial outstretched left arm. He described a twisting injury to head with fracture of the ulnar metaphysis or diaphysis. Athe arm at the time. He was seen in the accident and Type IV: anterior dislocation of the radial head, fracture emergency department with an obvious deformity of the dis- proximal third radius and fracture of the ulna at the same tal forearm and tenderness over the ipsilateral elbow. level.1 Movements at the wrist and elbow were painful and Letts classified such fractures in children into five groups. A restricted, and no neurological or vascular deficits were noted.
    [Show full text]
  • Fractures of the Proximal Ulna: Current Concepts in Surgical Management
    3.1800EOR0010.1302/2058-5241.3.180022 research-article2019 EOR | volume 4 | January 2019 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180022 Trauma www.efortopenreviews.org Fractures of the proximal ulna: current concepts in surgical management Sebastian Siebenlist1 Arne Buchholz2 Karl F. Braun2 Fractures of the proximal ulna range from simple olec- or Monteggia-like lesions involving damage to stabilizing ranon fractures to complex Monteggia fractures or key structures of the elbow (i.e. coronoid process, radial Monteggia- like lesions involving damage to stabilizing key head).1,2 While these fractures are common injuries in the structures of the elbow (i.e. coronoid process, radial head, upper extremity at any age, in adults they peak during the collateral ligament complex). seventh decade of life.3 The anatomical restoration of In complex fracture patterns a computerized tomography ulnar alignment (in length, rotation and axis) has to be the scan is essential to properly assess the injury severity. primary goal of surgical treatment to regain an unre- stricted elbow function. Thus, the surgeon carefully needs Exact preoperative planning for the surgical approach is to address all aspects of the injury to allow early (active) vital to adequately address all fracture parts (base coro- rehabilitation and thereby prevent elbow stiffness.4 An noid fragments first). improper osseous reconstruction of the ulna as well as a The management of olecranon fractures primarily comprises failed/missed reattachment of elbow stabilizing structures tension-band wiring in simple fractures as a valid treatment will otherwise result in persistent pain, poor function and option, but modern plate techniques, especially in commi- progressive joint degeneration due to chronic elbow nuted or osteoporotic fracture types, can reduce implant instability.5 Consequently, the appropriate treatment of failure and potential implant-related soft tissue irritation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsilateral Supracondylar Fracture and Forearm Bone Injury in Children: a Retrospective Review of Thirty One Cases
    Original Article VOL.9 | NO. 2 | ISSUE 34 | APR - JUN 2011 Ipsilateral Supracondylar Fracture and Forearm Bone Injury in Children: A Retrospective Review of Thirty one Cases Dhoju D, Shrestha D, Parajuli N, Dhakal G, Shrestha R Department of Orthopaedics and traumatology ABSTRACT Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital Background Dhulikhel, Nepal Supracondylar fracture and forearm bone fracture in isolation is common musculoskeletal injury in pediatric age group But combined supracondylar fracture with ipsilateral forearm bone fracture, also known as floating elbow is not common injury. The incidence of this association varies between 3% and 13%. Since the Corresponding Author injury is rare and only limited literatures are available, choosing best management options for floating elbow is challenging. Method Dr Dipak Shrestha In retrospective review of 759 consecutive supracondylar fracture managed in Department of Orthopaedics and traumatology between July 2005 to June 2011, children with combined supracondylar fracture Dhulikhel Hospital-Kathmandu University Hospital with forearm bone injuries were identified and their demographic profiles, mode of injury, fracture types, treatment procedures, outcome and complications were Dhulikhel, Nepal. analyzed. E-mail: [email protected] Result Thirty one patients (mean age 8.91 yrs, range 2-14 yrs; male 26; left side 18) had Mobile No: 9851073353 combined supracondylar fracture and ipsilateral forearm bone injury including four open fractures. There were 20 (64.51%) Gartland type III (13 type IIIA and 7 type III B), seven (22.58 %) type II, three (9.67 %) type I and one (3.22 %) flexion Citation type supracondylar fracture. Nine patients had distal radius fracture, six had distal third both bone fracture, three had distal ulna fracture, two had mid shaft both Dhoju D, ShresthaD, Parajuli N, Dhakal G, Shrestha R.
    [Show full text]
  • Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures Or ‘Don’T Throw Away the Cast’
    Techniques in Orthopaedics® 20(2):115–141 © 2005 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc., Philadelphia Nonoperative Management of Pediatric Upper Extremity Fractures or ‘Don’t Throw Away the Cast’ Kaye E. Wilkins, D.V.M., M.D. Summary: With the exception of fractures involving the distal humerus, almost all fractures of the upper extremity can be successfully treated by noninvasive methods. The surgeon treating upper extremity fractures in children in areas of developing nations where the medical and surgical resources are limited should have a good knowledge of the nonoperative techniques available. He or she should also be skilled in administering local and regional anesthesia. Fortunately, in the pediatric age group, there is a considerable remodeling potential. This fact determines the adequacy of the best reduction that can be obtained by nonoperative methods. Knowledge of the limits of satisfactory remodeling for the various fracture patterns is also essential. Anyone treating fractures in these areas needs to be flexible with their approach and innovative in their methods. Although these fractures often present challenges for the treating physician, they can provide a great deal of satisfaction when they are conquered and the patient’s fracture treatment has a successful outcome. The specific techniques for the nonoperative management of upper extremity fractures in the pediatric patient are discussed in detail. It must be emphasized, however, that the treating surgeon should both teach and perform procedures to achieve as satisfactory a reduction as possible within the resources of the local area. Key Words: Fractures—Nonoperative— Conservative—Casts. Emphasis on Surgery nations. Likewise, the implants are expensive and thus are In the United States, there has been an increasing rarely available.
    [Show full text]
  • The Results of Treatment in Pediatric Monteggia Equivalent Lesions Çocuklardaki Monteggia Eşdeğer Lezyonlarında Tedavi Sonuçları
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA et Author’s translation TRAUMATOLOGICA Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2008;42(2):90-96 TURCICA The results of treatment in pediatric Monteggia equivalent lesions Çocuklardaki Monteggia eşdeğer lezyonlarında tedavi sonuçları Melih GUVEN,1 Abdullah EREN,2 Baris KADIOGLU,2 Umut YAVUZ,2 Volkan KILINCOGLU,3 Korhan OZKAN2 1The Hospital of University of Abant Izzet Baysal, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology; 2Göztepe Training and Research Hospital, 2nd Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic; 3Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital, Orthopaedics and Traumatology Clinic Amaç: Monteggia eşdeğer lezyonlu çocuklarda konserva- Objectives: We evaluated the results of conservative and sur- tif ve cerrahi tedavi sonuçları değerlendirildi. gical treatment of pediatric Monteggia equivalent lesions. Çalışma planı: Çalışmaya, Monteggia eşdeğer kırıklı- Methods: The study included 13 children (3 females, 10 çıkığı nedeniyle tedavi edilen 13 çocuk hasta (3 kız, 10 er- males; mean age 8 years; range 4 to 13 years) who under- kek; ort. yaş 8; dağılım 4-13) alındı. Yedi hastada (%53.9) went treatment for Monteggia equivalent lesions. Seven pa- Bado tip 1, altı hastada (%46.2) ise tip 3 eşdeğer lezyon tients (53.9%) had Bado type 1 and six patients (46.2%) had vardı. Tip 3 eşdeğer lezyonlu hastaların ikisinde aynı za- type 3 equivalent lesions. Two patients with type 3 equiva- manda humerus lateral kondil kırığı saptandı. Bir hastada lent lesions also had a lateral humeral condyle fracture. On (%7.7) radial sinir felci vardı. Açık kırıklı-çıkık nedeniyle presentation, one patient (7.7%) had radial nerve palsy. Pri- acil debridman ve irigasyon uygulanan bir hasta dışında, marily, closed reduction was attempted in all the patients ex- tüm hastalarda öncelikle kapalı redüksiyon denendi.
    [Show full text]
  • Shoulder Pain and Weakness Due to Rotator Cuff Muscle/Tendon Or Biceps
    Fractures of the Forearm Bones The forearm is the area between the elbow and the wrist. It has two bones. The ulna bone starts at the point of the elbow and is well fixed as a hinge to the humerus (upper arm bone). The ulna bone can be felt beneath the skin as it extends all the way from the tip of the elbow down to the little finger side of the wrist. The radius bone spins around the ulna bone and can be felt at the wrist on the thumb side. It is called the radius because it spins around the ulna bone and allows a twisting motion of the wrist. The most common mechanism of fracture of the forearm bones is a fall onto an outstretched hand, or a direct blow of a hard object against the forearm. After an injury, significant deformity of the forearm reveals that there is a fracture. Significant pain and swelling is usually present. Occasionally nerve and blood vessel injuries can result from such a fracture. Fractures of the radius bone at the wrist are very common, and will be discussed in a different section of this website. The remaining fractures of the forearm include fractures of the radial shaft, fractures of the shaft of both the radius and the ulna, and fractures of the ulna alone. Radial Shaft Fractures Radial shaft fractures, without fracture of the ulna, are not very common. When this happens, sometimes the end of the ulna is dislocated at the level of the wrist. This deformity is known as a Galeazzi fracture.
    [Show full text]
  • Anterior Dislocation of the Radial Head with Fractures of the Olecranon and Radial Neck in a Young Child a Monteggia Equivalent Fracture-Dislocation Variant
    CASE REPORT Anterior Dislocation of the Radial Head With Fractures of the Olecranon and Radial Neck in a Young Child A Monteggia Equivalent Fracture-Dislocation Variant David E. Ruchelsman, MD,* Jeffrey A. Klugman, MD,* Sanjeev S. Madan, MD,† and Gail S. Chorney, MD† lesions, suggesting that equivalent lesions may be more com- Summary: We present a case of a type I Monteggia equivalent mon than previously thought.11–14 Although early diagnosis lesion in a 7-year-old child consisting of anterior dislocation of the and closed reduction of Type I Monteggia lesions usually yield radial head, radial neck fracture, and a fracture of the olecranon good to excellent results,2,4,5,9,10,15,16 Olney and Menelaus8 without an associated fracture of the ulnar diaphysis or metaphysis. suggested that type I equivalent injuries may require open After a review of the literature, we report this fracture pattern as reduction and internal fixation. a rare type I Monteggia equivalent fracture-dislocation variant. This We report a case of a child with a rare type I Monteggia report describes delayed surgical treatment and outcome after close equivalent fracture-dislocation requiring operative manage- follow-up of a rare type I Monteggia equivalent lesion. Diagnostic ment following failure of closed reduction. challenges with and treatment options for pediatric Monteggia equivalent fracture-dislocations are discussed. Key Words: children, Monteggia fracture-dislocation, olecranon CASE REPORT fracture, radial neck fracture, type I Monteggia equivalent lesion A 7-year-old right-hand-dominant male presented to our in- stitution 6.5 weeks after sustaining a hyperextension injury to his (J Orthop Trauma 2005;19:428–428) right elbow after falling on an outstretched forearm.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Extremity Fracture Eponyms
    What's in a name? Upper extremity fracture eponyms (Part 1) Philip Kin-Wai Wong, Emory University Tarek Hanna, Emory University Waqas Shuaib, Emory University Stephen Sanders, Emory University Faisal Khosa, Emory University Journal Title: International Journal of Emergency Medicine Volume: Volume 8, Number 1 Publisher: SpringerOpen | 2015-12-03, Pages 75-75 Type of Work: Article | Final Publisher PDF Publisher DOI: 10.1186/s12245-015-0075-2 Permanent URL: https://pid.emory.edu/ark:/25593/q4b4k Final published version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12245-015-0075-2 Copyright information: © Wong et al. 2015 This is an Open Access work distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Accessed October 1, 2021 8:34 AM EDT Wong et al. International Journal of Emergency Medicine (2015) 8:27 DOI 10.1186/s12245-015-0075-2 REVIEW Open Access What's in a name? Upper extremity fracture eponyms (Part 1) Philip Kin-Wai Wong1, Tarek N. Hanna2*, Waqas Shuaib3, Stephen M. Sanders4 and Faisal Khosa2 Abstract Eponymous extremity fractures are commonly encountered in the emergency setting. Correct eponym usage allows rapid, succinct communication of complex injuries. We will review both common and less frequently encountered extremity fracture eponyms, focusing on imaging features to identify and differentiate these injuries. We focus on plain radiographic findings, with supporting computed tomography (CT) images. For each injury, important radiologic descriptors are discussed which may need to be communicated to consultants. Aspects of management and follow-up imaging recommendations are included. This is a two-part review: Part 1 focuses on fracture eponyms of the upper extremity, while Part 2 covers fracture eponyms of the lower extremity.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Course of Treatment of Proximal One Third Ulna Fracture By
    International Journal of Orthopaedics Sciences 2019; 5(4): 124-129 E-ISSN: 2395-1958 P-ISSN: 2706-6630 IJOS 2019; 5(4): 124-129 Clinical course of treatment of proximal one third ulna © 2019 IJOS www.orthopaper.com fracture by plate osteosynthesis in skeletally mature Received: 09-08-2019 Accepted: 13-09-2019 individuals Dr. Anand Gupta Resident, Orthopaedics Dr. Anand Gupta, Dr. Saurabh Khare, Dr. Arun Gulati, Dr. Shah Meghal Maharaja Agrasen Hospital, New Delhi, India Gautambhai and Dr. Puneet Kamra Dr. Saurabh Khare DOI: https://doi.org/10.22271/ortho.2019.v5.i4c.1659 Resident, Orthopaedics Maharaja Agrasen Hospital, Abstract New Delhi, India Objective: To study the clinical course including radiological union, fracture union time and functional outcome of plate osteosynthesis for proximal one third ulna fracture in skeletally mature individuals. Dr. Arun Gulati Method: 30 patients of proximal ulna fractures who were treated by plate osteosynthesis were included Senior Resident, Orthopaedics Kalpana Chawla Govt. Medical in this study. College, Karnal, Haryana, India Result: 30 patients were followed up for minimum duration of 6 months and the clinical outcomes were assessed according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS). Out of 30, our study included 21 Dr. Shah Meghal Gautambhai olecranon fractures and 9 monteggia fractures. At final follow up of 6 month, our case series of olecranon Senior Resident, Orthopaedics fractures resulted mean MEPS of 89.3with 57.1% excellent results and 42.9 % good results, and all Sanjay Gandhi Memorial, patients returning to pre-injury daily activities. For monteggia fractures, resulted mean MEPS score is New Delhi, India 93.8 with 88.9% excellent result & 11.1 % good results.
    [Show full text]